Outcomes of kidney transplantation over a 16-year period in Korea: An analysis of the National Health Information Database

Impact of Induction Immunosuppressants on T Lymphocyte Subsets after Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Study with Focus on Anti-Thymocyte Globulin and Basiliximab Induction Therapies

Induction immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) primarily includes interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, such as basiliximab (BXM) or lymphocyte-depleting agents, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). This study aimed to investigate their effects on T cell dynamics during the early post-transplantation period. This prospective observational study included 157 KTRs. Peripheral blood samples were collected from each patient within 5 days before and 4 and 12 weeks after transplantation. Flow cytometric analysis was performed to assess various T cell subsets whose changes were then analyzed. In the ATG group, CD4+ T cell expression decreased significantly compared with that in the BXM group. However, CD4+CD161+ and CD4+CD25+CD127low T cell expression levels increased significantly. In the CD8+ T cell subset, a decrease in CD8+CD28nullCD57+ and CD8+CCR7+ T cell expression was observed in the ATG group. However, among patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven acute rejection, T cell subset expression did not significantly differ relative to non-rejection cases. In conclusion, ATG induction therapy resulted in more pronounced changes in T lymphocyte subsets than BXM induction, with increased CD4+CD161+ and CD4+CD25+CD127low T cells and an early decrease in CD8+CD28nullCD57+ and CD8+CCR7+ T cells, some of which are associated with acute rejection.

Associations of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion With Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Korea Over a 16-Year Period

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the associations between transfusion of different types of red blood cell (RBC) preparations and kidney allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT) over a 16-year period in Korea using a nationwide population-based cohort.

METHODS

We investigated the reported use of RBCs during hospitalization for KT surgery, rejection, and graft failure status using nationwide data from the National Health Information Database (2002-2017). The associations between the type of perioperative RBC product and transplant outcomes were evaluated among four predefined groups: no RBC transfusion, filtered RBCs, washed RBCs, and packed RBCs (pRBCs).

RESULTS

A total of 17,754 KT patients was included, among which 8,530 (48.0%) received some type of RBC transfusion. Of the patients who received RBC transfusion, 74.9%, 19.7%, and 5.4% received filtered RBCs, pRBCs, or washed RBCs, respectively. Regardless of the type of RBC products, the proportions of acute rejection and graft failure was significantly greater in patients receiving transfusion (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that the filtered RBC and pRBC groups were significantly associated with both rejection and graft failure. The washed RBC group also had hazard ratios greater than 1.0 for rejection and graft failure, but the association was not significant. Rejection-free survival of the pRBC group was significantly lower than that of the other groups (P < 0.001, log-rank test), and graft survival for the no RBC transfusion group was significantly greater than in the other groups (P < 0.001, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative RBC transfusion was associated with poor graft outcomes. Notably, transfusion of pRBCs significantly increased transplant rejection. Therefore, careful consideration of indications for RBC transfusion and selection of the appropriate type of RBCs is necessary, especially for patients at high risk of rejection or graft failure.

Predictor factor for worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients infected with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a massive impact on the health sector, especially in patients with pre-existing comorbidities. This study aims to define the predictor factors for worse outcomes in kidney transplant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have analyzed in these patients their prior medical history, their clinical symptoms, and their laboratory results.

METHOD

We assessed outcomes of kidney transplant patients with confirmed COVID-19 until July 2021 from PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Scopus, and EBSCO. We performed meta-analyses of nine published studies to estimate predictor factors. The analysis was analyzed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and then using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULT

Our analysis demonstrated that the most significant risk factors for the worse COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant patients included: age of 60 and older [MD 9.31(95% CI, 6.31-12.30), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], diabetic nephropathy [OR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.49-3.04), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], dyspnea [OR 4.53, (95% CI, 2.22-9.22), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 4.53 (95% CI, 1.10-5.21), p = 0.03, I2 = 58%], and some laboratory markers. Many patients had two or multiple risk factors in combination.

CONCLUSION

Age and several comorbidities were the most significant factors for COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.

Characteristics of stroke after liver and kidney transplantation

Background

The mechanism and characteristics of a post-transplantation stroke may differ between liver (LT) and kidney transplantation (KT), as the associated comorbidities and peri-surgical conditions are different. Herein, we investigated the characteristics and etiologies of stroke occurring after LT and KT.

Methods

Consecutive patients who received LT or KT between January 2005 to December 2020 who were diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke after transplantation were enrolled. Ischemic strokes were further classified according to the etiologies. The characteristics of stroke, including in-hospital stroke, perioperative stroke, stroke etiology, and timing of stroke, were compared between the LT and KT groups.

Results

There were 105 (1.8%) and 58 (1.3%) post-transplantation stroke patients in 5,950 LT and 4,475 KT recipients, respectively. Diabetes, hypertension, and coronary arterial disease were less frequent in the LT than the KT group. In-hospital and perioperative strokes were more common in LT than in the KT group (LT, 57.9%; KT, 39.7%; p = 0.03, and LT, 43.9%; KT, 27.6%; p = 0.04, respectively). Hemorrhagic strokes were also more common in the LT group (LT, 25.2%; KT, 8.6%; p = 0.01). Analysis of ischemic stroke etiology did not reveal significant difference between the two groups; undetermined etiology was the most common, followed by small vessel occlusion and cardioembolism. The 3-month mortality was similar between the two groups (both LT and KT, 10.3%) and was independently associated with in-hospital stroke and elevated C-reactive protein.

Conclusions

In-hospital, perioperative, and hemorrhagic strokes were more common in the LT group than in the KT group. Ischemic stroke subtypes did not differ significantly between the two groups and undetermined etiology was the most common cause of ischemic stroke in both groups. High mortality after stroke was noted in transplantation patients and was associated with in-hospital stroke.

Pregnancy outcomes after living kidney donation from a nationwide population-based cohort study from Korea

While most living kidney donors experience good outcomes and high rates of satisfaction, kidney donation can increase the risk of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. However, pregnancy outcomes in non-white donors are limited. We conducted a nationwide cohort study of 112 living kidney donors and 672 matched healthy non-donors using the Korean National Health Insurance Claims Database. Donors and healthy non-donors were matched according to age, year of cohort entry, residency, income, number of pregnancies, and the time to the first pregnancy after cohort entry. We assessed pregnancy outcomes of live kidney donors compared with matched healthy non-donors using the nationwide database. Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia was more common in kidney donors than in non-donors (8.9% vs. 1.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-6.50). However, the incidence of severe gestational hypertension or preeclampsia that required antihypertensive medication was comparable (2.7% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.121). The time from donation to delivery within 5 years and primiparity were risk factors for preeclampsia in donors. Low birth weight, stillbirth, and ectopic pregnancy were not significantly different between the two groups. Maternal death occurred in two non-donor cases, but none occurred in donors compared to non-donors. Our findings indicate that kidney donors are associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia than matched healthy non-donors. However, the probabilities of serious maternal and fetal outcomes remained low and are not increased significantly after kidney donation.

Impact of donor hypertension on graft survival and function in living and deceased donor kidney transplantation: a nationwide prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Hypertensive living donors are potential candidates to expand the kidney donor pool. However, the impact of donor hypertension on graft survival and function remains to be clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed 3907 kidney transplant recipients registered in a nationwide prospective cohort from 2014 to 2018. Patients were divided by donor types and the presence of donor hypertension. The primary and secondary outcome was the occurrence of death-censored graft failure and renal allograft function, respectively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hypertension was 9.4% (258/2740) and 19.9% (232/1167) in living and deceased donors, respectively. During a median follow-up of 21.8 months, death-censored graft survival rate was significantly worse in recipients of hypertensive living donors than in those of normotensive living donors ( P  = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, recipients of hypertensive living donors had a significantly increased risk of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio 2.91; P  = 0.009). The risk of allograft loss was not different between recipients of hypertensive living and normotensive deceased donors. Propensity score-matched analyses had consistent worse graft survival rate in recipients of hypertensive living donors compared to those of normotensive living donors ( P  = 0.027), while it was not different between recipients of hypertensive living and normotensive deceased donors. Hypertension in living donors had a significant negative impact on one-year graft function (adjusted unstandardized β -3.64; P  = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive living donor recipients have significantly higher risks of renal allograft loss than normotensive living donor recipients, and showed similar outcomes compared to recipients of normotensive deceased donors.