The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Optimizing ctDNA: An Updated Review of a Promising Clinical Tool for the Management of Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Distant metastasis is common, affecting around 50% of patients. Prognostic accuracy relies on molecular characterization of tumor tissue. In these patients, however, conventional biopsy can be challenging due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient tissue for the analysis due to the small tumor size and/or post-brachytherapy shrinkage. An alternative approach is liquid biopsy, a non-invasive technique that allows for real-time monitoring of tumor dynamics. Liquid biopsy plays an increasingly prominent role in precision medicine, providing valuable information on the molecular profile of the tumor and treatment response. Liquid biopsy can facilitate early detection and can be used to monitor progression and recurrence. ctDNA-based tests are particularly promising due to their ease of integration into clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the application of ctDNA in liquid biopsies for UM. More specifically, we explore the emerging technologies in this field and the advantages and disadvantages of using different bodily fluids for liquid biopsy. Finally, we discuss the current barriers to routine clinical use of this technique.

Technical Advances in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Detection and Analysis for Personalized Medicine in Patients' Care

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to small fragments of DNA molecules released after programmed cell death and necrosis in several body fluids such as blood, saliva, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. The discovery of cfDNA has revolutionized the field of non-invasive diagnostics in the oncologic field, in prenatal testing, and in organ transplantation. Despite the potential of cfDNA and the solid results published in the recent literature, several challenges remain, represented by a low abundance, a need for highly sensitive assays, and analytical issues. In this review, the main technical advances in cfDNA analysis are presented and discussed, with a comprehensive examination of the current available methodologies applied in each field. Considering the potential advantages of cfDNA, this biomarker is increasing its consensus among clinicians, as it allows us to monitor patients' conditions in an easy and non-invasive way, offering a more personalized care. Nevertheless, cfDNA analysis is still considered a diagnostic marker to be further validated, and very few centers are implementing its analysis in routine diagnostics. As technical improvements are enhancing the performances of cfDNA analysis, its application will transversally improve patients' quality of life.

Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: Onward and upward

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, liquid biopsy has emerged as one of the most interesting areas of research in oncology, leading to innovative trials and practical changes in all aspects of CRC management. RNAs and cell free DNA (cfDNA) methylation are emerging as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis. Post-surgical circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can aid in evaluating minimal residual disease and personalising adjuvant treatment. In rectal cancer, ctDNA could improve response assessment to neoadjuvant therapy and risk stratification, especially in the era of organ-preservation trials. In the advanced setting, ctDNA analysis offers the opportunity to monitor treatment response and identify driver and resistance mutations more comprehensively than traditional tissue analysis, providing prognostic and predictive information. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the clinical applications and future perspectives of liquid biopsy in CRC.

Current advances in detecting genetic and epigenetic biomarkers of colorectal cancer

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of diagnosis and the second in terms of mortality. Recent studies have shown that various proteins, extracellular vesicles (i.e., exosomes), specific genetic variants, gene transcripts, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and altered epigenetic patterns, can be used to detect, and assess the prognosis of CRC. Over the last decade, a plethora of conventional methodologies (e.g., polymerase chain reaction [PCR], direct sequencing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], microarray, in situ hybridization) as well as advanced analytical methodologies (e.g., microfluidics, electrochemical biosensors, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [SERS]) have been developed for analyzing genetic and epigenetic biomarkers using both optical and non-optical tools. Despite these methodologies, no gold standard detection method has yet been implemented that can analyze CRC with high specificity and sensitivity in an inexpensive, simple, and time-efficient manner. Moreover, until now, no study has critically reviewed the advantages and limitations of these methodologies. Here, an overview of the most used genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for CRC and their detection methods are discussed. Furthermore, a summary of the major biological, technical, and clinical challenges and advantages/limitations of existing techniques is also presented.

Neo-Antigen-Reactive T Cells Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A More Personalized Cancer Therapy Approach

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common malignancy in women and the third most frequent cancer in men. Evidence has revealed that the survival of patients with metastatic CRC is very low, between one and three years. Neoantigens are known proteins encoded by mutations in tumor cells. It is theorized that recognizing neoantigens by T cells leads to T cell activation and further antitumor responses. Neoantigen-reactive T cells (NRTs) are designed against the mentioned neoantigens expressed by tumor cells. NRTs selectively kill tumor cells without damage to non-cancerous cells. Identifying patient-specific and high immunogen neoantigens is important in NRT immunotherapy of patients with CRC. However, the main challenges are the side effects and preparation of NRTs, as well as the effectiveness of these cells in vivo. This review summarized the properties of neoantigens as well as the preparation and therapeutic outcomes of NRTs for the treatment of CRC.

Comparison of KRAS gene in circulating tumor DNA levels vs histological grading of colorectal cancer patients through liquid biopsy

Background

To determine KRAS gene in circulating tumor DNA in comparison with histological grading through liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

This dual-centered cross-sectional study included 73 diagnosed patients of colorectal cancer at different grading levels [Grade I, well differentiated (n = 7, 9.5%); Grade II, moderately differentiated (n = 14,18.9%); and Grade III, poorly differentiated (n = 52, 70%)]. Blood was collected, and plasma was separated. ctDNA was extracted, using magnetic bead-based technique (MagMAX Cell-Free DNA kit). KRAS gene was quantified through qPCR. STRING database was used to find KRAS interactomes.

Results

Mean threshold cycle (CT value) of KRAS gene in Grade III samples showed significantly higher (P = 0.001) levels of ctDNA (2.7 ± 1.14) compared with Grade II and Grade I (3.1 ± 0.68, 2.3 ± 0.60), respectively. Grading characterization showed that rectal cancer (n = 22, 42.3%) with Grade III (68.8%) was more prevalent than colon and sigmoid cancer (n = 19, 36.5%, n = 11, 21%, respectively). STRING database showed 10 functional genes interacting with KRAS expressed as gene/proteins.

Conclusion

Liquid biopsy can be used to detect ctDNA in plasma of CRC patients and enabled to detect the KRAS gene by qPCR. The technique being less invasive and cost-effective is convenient for multiple biopsies in different cancers.

Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

Nucleotide-selective amplification and array-based detection for identifying multiple somatic mutations

In the context of personalized and cost-effective treatment, knowledge of the mutational status of specific genes is advantageous to predict which patients are responsive to therapies. As an alternative to one-by-one detection or massive sequencing, the presented genotyping tool determines multiple polymorphic sequences that vary a single nucleotide. The biosensing method includes an effective enrichment of mutant variants and selective recognition by colorimetric DNA arrays. The proposed approach is the hybridization between sequence-tailored probes and products from PCR with SuperSelective primers to discriminate specific variants in a single locus. A fluorescence scanner, a documental scanner, or a smartphone captured the chip images to obtain spot intensities. Hence, specific recognition patterns identified any single-nucleotide change in the wild-type sequence overcoming qPCR methods and other array-based approaches. Studied mutational analyses applied to human cell lines provided high discrimination factors, the precision was 95%, and the sensitivity was 1% mutant of total DNA. Also, the methods showed a selective genotyping of the KRAS gene from tumorous samples (tissue and liquid biopsy), corroborating results by NGS. The developed technology supported on low-cost robust chips and optical reading provides an attractive pathway toward implementing fast, cheap, reproducible discrimination of oncological patients.

A three-in-one microfluidic droplet digital PCR platform for absolute quantitative analysis of DNA

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technology has found widespread applications in the ultrasensitive analysis of nucleic acids, where integrated ddPCR platforms with the capability of sample dispersion, followed by in situ amplification and data analysis, are highly expected. However, current integrated ddPCR platforms are usually limited by either difficultly mass-produced materials or lack of integrated control instruments, restricting their practical application. This paper proposes an integrated three-in-one ddPCR platform with high user-friendliness and practicability, which is composed of an easy-to-use chip and a matching control instrument. The chip was made of thermally resistant and easily mass-produced polycarbonate (PC) material, and the benchtop control instrument was designed to perform droplet generation, in situ amplification, and fluorescence reading. The droplet generation and in situ heating on the chip were well characterized. Finally, the performance of the platform was validated through the analysis of the EGFR L858R mutation in lung cancer. The proposed three-in-one ddPCR platform shows great practicability in ultrasensitive nucleic acid testing. By virtue of its sensitivity, practicability, and cost-effectiveness, the ddPCR can serve as a universal detection platform for monitoring nucleic acid in the fields of tumor diagnosis, pathogen detection, and prenatal diagnosis.

Diagnostic value of liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine: 10 years of clinical evidence in cancer

Liquid biopsy is a diagnostic repeatable test, which in last years has emerged as a powerful tool for profiling cancer genomes in real-time with minimal invasiveness and tailoring oncological decision-making. It analyzes different blood-circulating biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the preferred one. Nevertheless, tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for molecular evaluation of solid tumors whereas liquid biopsy is a complementary tool in many different clinical settings, such as treatment selection, monitoring treatment response, cancer clonal evolution, prognostic evaluation, as well as the detection of early disease and minimal residual disease (MRD). A wide number of technologies have been developed with the aim of increasing their sensitivity and specificity with acceptable costs. Moreover, several preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted to better understand liquid biopsy clinical utility. Anyway, several issues are still a limitation of its use such as false positive and negative results, results interpretation, and standardization of the panel tests. Although there has been rapid development of the research in these fields and recent advances in the clinical setting, many clinical trials and studies are still needed to make liquid biopsy an instrument of clinical routine. This review provides an overview of the current and future clinical applications and opening questions of liquid biopsy in different oncological settings, with particular attention to ctDNA liquid biopsy.

Comparison of digital PCR systems for the analysis of liquid biopsy samples of patients affected by lung and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Highly sensitive technologies are available for the molecular characterization of solid tumors, including digital PCR (dPCR). Liquid biopsy, based on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is often used to assess EGFR or RAS alterations in lung and colorectal cancers. Our study aimed to compare the results of two different dPCR platforms for the detection of mutations in cfDNA.

METHODS

Plasma samples from lung and colorectal cancer patients collected as per routine procedures have been tested. cfDNA Was extracted from plasma, and samples were screened on the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, BioRad) and solid dPCR QIAcuity (Qiagen).

RESULTS

A total of 42 samples were analyzed, obtained from 20 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying an EGFR or a KRAS mutation on tissue at diagnosis, and from 22 samples of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, 10 of which presenting a KRAS mutation. EGFR mutation detection was 58.8% for ddPCR and 100% for dPCR (κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71), compared to tissue results. The detection rate for RAS mutations was 72.7% for ddPCR and 86.4% for dPCR (κ = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68), compared to tissue results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed moderate agreement between dPCR and ddPCR. Sampling effect or threshold settings may potentially explain the differences in the cfDNA data between the two different platforms.

Detection of driver mutations in plasma cell-free nucleic acids in differentiated thyroid neoplasm

IMPORTANCE

This proof-of-concept paper demonstrates that driver mutations can be detected in plasma in differentiated thyroid tumors, and we were able to detect mutations in upto 80% malignant thyroid nodules. Additionally, cancer subtypes could also be predicted using a 8-gene panel. In almost 90% follicular adenoma, rat sarcoma virus (RAS) mutations were detectable. There was a strong agreement between driver mutations found in plasma samples, FNAC materials, and histopathology samples. This has potential as a noninvasive, preoperative diagnostic tool (particularly of clinical importance in indeterminate nodules) and may help in detection of residual tumor after surgery. Future research is warranted to test the role of this tool to detect tumor recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonographic (USG) evaluation and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are cornerstone for evaluation of thyroid neoplasm. Molecular technique including detection of driver mutation from FNA cytology (FNAC) material is an established modality. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using plasma cell-free nucleic acids to identify known driver mutations in differentiated thyroid neoplasm.

DESIGN

Patients presenting with thyroid nodules underwent USG with Thyroid Image Reporting and Data Systems scoring and FNAC (Bethesda classification). All patients in Bethesda 3, 4, 5, 6 underwent surgery and histopathological confirmation. Patients in Bethesda 2 (cosmetic concerns, compressive symptoms) underwent surgery, and rest were presumed benign on the basis of USG, FNAC features, and clinical followup.).

SETTING

Endocrinology clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects with thyroid nodule.

INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPOSURE(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S)

Plasma sample, FNA, and histopathology material were evaluated for driver mutations (8-gene panel comprising BRAF-V600E, RET/PTC3, RET/PTC1, TERT promoter, HRAS, NRAS, KRAS, and PAX8-PPARG).

RESULTS

A total of 223 subjects were recruited; of these 154 were benign and 69 had differentiated thyroid cancer. We were able to detect driver mutation from plasma in 55 subjects (79.71%) of all malignant patients, and 11 patients in benign category had RAS mutation (follicular adenoma). Rest of the benign nodules did not have any detectable driver mutations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Plasma might be a viable noninvasive alternative source for detection of driver mutations (8-gene panel) in subjects with differentiated thyroid tumors and may have significant clinical utility.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Circulating-Free DNA and Cell-Free RNA in Cancer Management

Over time, molecular biology and genomics techniques have been developed to speed up the early diagnosis and clinical management of cancer. These therapies are often most effective when administered to the subset of malignancies harboring the target identified by molecular testing. Important advances in applying molecular testing involve circulating-free DNA (cfDNA)- and cell-free RNA (cfRNA)-based liquid biopsies for the diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and treatment of cancer. Both cfDNA and cfRNA are sensitive and specific biomarkers for cancer detection, which have been clinically proven through multiple randomized and prospective trials. These help in cancer management based on the noninvasive evaluation of size, quantity, and point mutations, as well as copy number alterations at the tumor site. Moreover, personalized detection of ctDNA helps in adjuvant therapeutics and predicts the chances of recurrence of cancer and resistance to cancer therapy. Despite the controversial diagnostic values of cfDNA and cfRNA, many clinical trials have been completed, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved many multigene assays to detect genetic alterations in the cfDNA of cancer patients. In this review, we underpin the recent advances in the physiological roles of cfDNA and cfRNA, as well as their roles in cancer detection by highlighting recent clinical trials and their roles as prognostic and predictive markers in cancer management.

Multivariate Risk Analysis of RAS, BRAF and EGFR Mutations Allelic Frequency and Coexistence as Colorectal Cancer Predictive Biomarkers

Simple Summary

The colorectal cancer (CRC) stage and evolution should be described by biomarker profiles. In 60 CRC cases, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutations were analyzed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). KRAS G12/G13 mutation was present in all patients with variable allelic frequencies. KRAS Q61 mutation was correlated with tumor invasion beyond the subserosa and poor differentiation, both associated with worst prognosis. Tumors with NRAS and BRAF mutations were prevalently localized on the right segment colon. The discovery of the KRAS Q61 role in tumor phenotypes provides the foundation for new therapeutic strategies and perspectives on molecular subtypes classification of CRC.

Abstract

Background: Biomarker profiles should represent a coherent description of the colorectal cancer (CRC) stage and its predicted evolution. Methods: Using droplet digital PCR, we detected the allelic frequencies (AF) of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutations from 60 tumors. We employed a pair-wise association approach to estimate the risk involving AF mutations as outcome variables for clinical data and as predicting variables for tumor-staging. We evaluated correlations between mutations of AFs and also between the mutations and histopathology features (tumor staging, inflammation, differentiation, and invasiveness). Results: KRAS G12/G13 mutations were present in all patients. KRAS Q61 was significantly associated with poor differentiation, high desmoplastic reaction, invasiveness (ypT4), and metastasis (ypM1). NRAS and BRAF were associated with the right-side localization of tumors. Diabetic patients had a higher risk to exhibit NRAS G12/G13 mutations. BRAF and NRAS G12/G13 mutations co-existed in tumors with invasiveness limited to the submucosa. Conclusions: The associations we found and the mutational AF we reported may help to understand disease processes and may be considered as potential CCR biomarker candidates. In addition, we propose representative mutation panels associated with specific clinical and histopathological features of CRC, as a unique opportunity to refine the degree of personalization of CRC treatment.

The Effectiveness of ddPCR for Detection of Point Mutations in Poor-Quality Saliva Samples

Background: The noninvasive collection of saliva samples for DNA analyses is simple, and its potential for research and diagnostic purposes is great. However, DNA isolates from such samples are often of inferior quality to those from blood. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the robustness and sensitivity of the ddPCR instrument for genetic analyses from saliva samples of poor quality by comparing their results to those obtained using an established method from blood samples. Methods: Blood and saliva were collected from 47 university students, which was followed by manual isolation of DNA and analysis on droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Results of analyses were supplemented with values of fractional abundances. Results: ddPCR proved to be highly suitable for analysis of even low-quality saliva samples (concentrations as low as 0.79 ng/µL), especially when augmented by fractional abundance data. This combination yielded 100% agreement with results obtained from blood samples. Conclusion: This study verified the applicability of ddPCR as a sensitive and robust method of genetic diagnostic testing even from low-quality saliva isolates. This makes it potentially suitable for a wide range of applications and facilitates the performance of large epidemiological studies, even if sampling or sample processing is suboptimal.

Liquid biopsy at the frontier of detection, prognosis and progression monitoring in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and a leading cause of carcinogenic death. To date, surgical resection is regarded as the gold standard by the operator for clinical decisions. Because conventional tissue biopsy is invasive and only a small sample can sometimes be obtained, it is unable to represent the heterogeneity of tumor or dynamically monitor tumor progression. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find a new minimally invasive or noninvasive diagnostic strategy to detect CRC at an early stage and monitor CRC recurrence. Over the past years, a new diagnostic concept called “liquid biopsy” has gained much attention. Liquid biopsy is noninvasive, allowing repeated analysis and real-time monitoring of tumor recurrence, metastasis or therapeutic responses. With the advanced development of new molecular techniques in CRC, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), exosomes, and tumor-educated platelet (TEP) detection have achieved interesting and inspiring results as the most prominent liquid biopsy markers. In this review, we focused on some clinical applications of CTCs, ctDNA, exosomes and TEPs and discuss promising future applications to solve unmet clinical needs in CRC patients.

Smartphone-Based Pure DNAzyme Hydrogel Platform for Visible and Portable Colorimetric Detection of Cell-Free DNA

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), as a tumor marker, is of great importance for the diagnosis of cancer and targeted therapy. However, the need for huge analytical instruments for cfDNA analysis has restricted its practical applications, especially in rural areas and third-world countries. Herein, a portable and visual smartphone-based DNAzyme hydrogel platform is developed for cfDNA detection. The target cfDNA triggers rolling circle amplification to produce a G-quadruplex-comprised DNA hydrogel with an horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-like catalytic function, which further catalyzes the chromogenic substrate to generate a visible output signal. Notably, the naked-eye detection of cfDNA can be realized by the macroscale visibility and catalytic ability of the DNA hydrogel. The linear range of the DNAzyme hydrogel platform for cfDNA detection is 0.1 pM-1500 nM with a detection limit of 0.042 pM. Moreover, this platform is exploited for the detection of cfDNA in spiked human serum with favorable sensitivity and recovery. Therefore, the DNAzyme hydrogel platform provides highly promising potential for testing other nucleic acid biomarkers.

Diving into the Pleural Fluid: Liquid Biopsy for Metastatic Malignant Pleural Effusions

Simple Summary

Malignant pleural effusion is a common complication arising as the natural progression of many tumors, such as lung cancer. When this occurs, the common protocol consists of analyzing the pleural fluid for the presence of malignant cells. However, on many occasions no malignant cells are found despite a clear suspicion of cancer. Thus, the current diagnostic methodology is imperfect and more precise methods for the identification of malignancy are needed. Nonetheless, these methods are often invasive, which may be counterproductive, especially for patients with poor health condition. These concerns have made clinicians consider alternative non-invasive strategies to diagnose cancer using the generally abundant pleural fluid (e.g., liquid biopsy). Thus, a liquid sample can be analyzed for the presence of cancer footprints, such as circulating malignant cells and tumor nucleic acids. Herein, we review the literature for studies considering pleural fluid as a successful source of liquid biopsy.

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is emerging as a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool for malignant pleural effusions (MPE) due to the low sensitivity of conventional pleural fluid (PF) cytological examination and the difficulty to obtain tissue biopsies, which are invasive and require procedural skills. Currently, liquid biopsy is increasingly being used for the detection of driver mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma specimens to guide therapeutic interventions. Notably, malignant PF are richer than plasma in tumor-derived products with potential clinical usefulness, such as ctDNA, micro RNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circulating tumor cells (CTC). Tumor-educated cell types, such as platelets and macrophages, have also been added to this diagnostic armamentarium. Herein, we will present an overview of the role of the preceding biomarkers, collectively known as liquid biopsy, in PF samples, as well as the main technical approaches used for their detection and quantitation, including a proper sample processing. Technical limitations of current platforms and future perspectives in the field will also be addressed. Using PF as liquid biopsy shows promise for use in current practice to facilitate the diagnosis and management of metastatic MPE.

The molecular profiling of solid tumors by liquid biopsy: a position paper of the AIOM-SIAPEC-IAP-SIBioC-SIC-SIF Italian Scientific Societies

The term liquid biopsy (LB) refers to the use of various biological fluids as a surrogate for neoplastic tissue to achieve information for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. In the current clinical practice, LB is used for the identification of driver mutations in circulating tumor DNA derived from both tumor tissue and circulating neoplastic cells. As suggested by a growing body of evidence, however, there are several clinical settings where biological samples other than tissue could be used in the routine practice to identify potentially predictive biomarkers of either response or resistance to targeted treatments. New applications are emerging as useful clinical tools, and other blood derivatives, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor RNA, microRNAs, platelets, extracellular vesicles, as well as other biofluids such as urine and cerebrospinal fluid, may be adopted in the near future. Despite the evident advantages compared with tissue biopsy, LB still presents some limitations due to both biological and technological issues. In this context, the absence of harmonized procedures corresponds to an unmet clinical need, ultimately affecting the rapid implementation of LB in clinical practice. In this position paper, based on experts’ opinions, the AIOM–SIAPEC-IAP–SIBIOC–SIF Italian Scientific Societies critically discuss the most relevant technical issues of LB, the current and emerging evidences, with the aim to optimizing the applications of LB in the clinical setting.

•

In the current clinical practice LB is used for the identification of driver mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

•

New applications in tumors other than non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are emerging as useful clinical tools.

•

Other blood derivatives, together with other biofluids, are an active field of research and may be adopted in the near future.

•

Despite the evident advantages, liquid biopsy still presents limitations due to both biological and technological issues.

•

Standardization of the procedures needs to be addressed to ensure widespread implementation in clinical practice.