Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulant and proton pump inhibitor co-therapy

Long-Term Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3% of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (CAT) prior to operation. The management of these patients is complex, as it involves balancing the potential risk of thrombosis against that of bleeding. Our primary objective is to assess the long-term bleeding risk in patients undergoing MBS. We also aim to observe the trends in anticoagulant dosing after MBS.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent either primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with preoperative CAT between 2008 and 2022 was performed. Data on baseline demographics, indication for anticoagulation, type of CAT, and dosing were collected. Events of bleeding and the CAT at event were subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (82 RYGB and 50 SG) initially on CAT were identified, with atrial fibrillation being the most common indication. Incidence of long-term bleeding was significantly higher in the RYGB group (18.3%) compared to the SG group (4%) (p = 0.017) over a total of 5.2 ± 3.8 years. Bleeding marginal ulcer (MU) was the most common cause of bleeding in the RYGB group (13.4%). 84.2% of all bleeding events occurred in patients on chronic Warfarin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term CAT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding in RYGB patients, particularly MU bleeds. Patients on CAT seeking MBS should be counseled regarding this risk and potential implications. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants offer promise as an alternative to Warfarin in these patients; further research is necessary to better understand their safety.

Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Studies

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), "real-world" studies have investigated their safety profile on gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) when used by patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and summarize this data after Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

STUDY

Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies that met predefined inclusion criteria were included and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, prior exposure to VKA (vitamin K antagonist), age, gender, geographic location of population samples, as well as Leave-One-Out and Low/Moderate Risk of Bias sensitivity analyses were performed. A random effects model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies were included. Apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of GIH compared with Dabigatran (HR: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81, I2 : 53.28%), Rivaroxaban (HR: 0.56, 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70, I2 : 79.17%), and VKA (HR: 0.68, 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.78, I2 : 71.93%). Rivaroxaban was associated with increased GIH risk compared with Dabigatran (HR: 1.19, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.40, I2 : 72.96%) and VKA (HR: 1.16, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.27, I2 : 81.95%). Dabigatran was associated with similar GIH risk compared with VKA (HR: 1.11, 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.26, I2 : 87.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that Apixaban was associated with a reduction in GIH risk compared with Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and VKA, whereas Rivaroxaban was associated with an increase in GIH risk compared with both Dabigatran and VKA.

Incidence of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Related Risk Factors among Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Major Limb Fractures: An Analytical Cohort Study

(1) Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), a major postoperative complication after surgical fixation of major limb fractures, can be fatal but is often neglected. This study determined the incidence rates of and related risk factors for perioperative UGIB among older patients with major upper limb fractures but without a history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). (2) Methods: We collected the data of patients aged more than 65 years who underwent surgery for major limb fracture between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2017, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and excluded those with a history of UGIB and PUD before the date of surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of UGIB requiring panendoscopy during hospitalization. A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of UGIB, with adjustment for confounding factors. The final model included variables that were either statistically significant in univariate analyses or deemed clinically important. (3) Results: The incidence of UGIB was 2.8% among patients with major limb fractures. Male sex, older age, major lower limb fracture, and a history of chronic renal disease were significant risk factors for the increased incidence of perioperative UGIB. (4) Conclusions: Patients with major limb fractures who underwent surgery exhibited a higher rate of stress ulceration with UGIB, even when they had no history of PUD. Perioperative preventive protocols (e.g., protocols for the administration of proton-pump inhibitors) may be necessary for patients with these major risk factors.

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain as a prognosticator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a low-normal left ventricular ejection fraction

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic utility of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50-60%.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 349 patients with HCM and an LVEF of 50-60%. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, including sudden cardiac death (SCD) and SCD-equivalent events. The secondary outcomes were SCD/SCD-equivalent events, cardiovascular death (including SCD), and all-cause death. The final analysis included 349 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 14.2 years, men 75.6%). During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in 26 (7.4%), while the secondary outcomes of SCD/SCD-equivalent events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death occurred in 15 (4.2%), 20 (5.7%), and 34 (9.7%), respectively. After adjusting for age, atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke, LVEF, and left atrial volume index, absolute LV-GLS (%) was independently associated with the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.788-0.988, P = 0.029]. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, 10.5% is an optimal cut-off value for absolute LV-GLS in predicting the primary outcome. Patients with an absolute LV-GLS ≤ 10.5% had a higher risk of the primary outcome than those with an absolute LV-GLS > 10.5% (adjusted HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.117-5.787, P = 0.026). Absolute LV-GLS ≤ 10.5% was an independent predictor for each secondary outcome (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LV-GLS was an independent predictor of a composite of cardiovascular death, including SCD/SCD-equivalent events, in patients with HCM and an LVEF of 50-60%. Therefore, LV-GLS can help in risk stratification in these patients.

Proton pump inhibitors and gastroprotection in patients treated with antithrombotic drugs: A cardiologic point of view

Aspirin, other antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulant drugs are used across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. A concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed in these patients, as gastrointestinal complications are relatively frequent. On the other hand, a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested in patients treated with PPIs; in particular, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection of clopidogrel, due to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions through hepatic metabolism. Previously, the concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole or esomeprazole has been discouraged. In contrast, it remains less known whether PPI use may affect the clinical efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel, new P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Current guidelines recommend PPI use in combination with antiplatelet treatment in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, PPIs could be recommended, even if their usefulness deserves further data. H. pylori infection should always be investigated and treated in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication) treated with antithrombotic drugs. The present review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread combined use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs, discussing consequent clinical implications.

Antithrombotics and Gastrointestinal Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

Antithrombotic medications include both antiplatelet and anticoagulants and are used for a wide variety of cardiovascular conditions. A common complication of antithrombotic use is gastrointestinal bleeding. As a result, gastrointestinal prophylaxis is a common consideration for patients on a single or combination antithrombotic regimen. Prophylaxis is typically achieved through use of either proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists. Current recommendations for use of gastrointestinal prophylaxis with concomitant use of antithrombotic medications are scarce. In this systematic review, we explore the current evidence and recommendations regarding gastrointestinal prophylaxis for patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy as well as combination regimens.

Safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients on tuberculosis treatment

Anti-tuberculosis treatment can cause significant drug-drug interaction and interfere with effective anticoagulation. However, there is a lack of evidence and conflicting data on the optimal oral anticoagulation in patients treated for tuberculosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients on anti-tuberculosis treatment. Patients on concomitant oral anticoagulation and anti-tuberculosis treatment including rifampin were identified from the Korean nationwide healthcare database. Subjects were censored at discontinuation of either anticoagulation or rifampin. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, death, and ischemic stroke. A total 2090 patients (1153 on warfarin, 937 on NOAC) were included. NOAC users, compared to warfarin users, were older, had a lower prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and aspirin use and a higher prevalence of cancer, with no significant differences in CHA₂DS₂-VASc or HAS-BLED scores. There were 18 major bleeding events, 106 deaths, and 50 stroke events during a mean follow-up of 2.9 months. After multivariable adjustment, the use of NOAC was associated with a lower risk of incident ischemic stroke (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.94), while there was no significant difference in risk for major bleeding or death compared with warfarin. These results suggest that NOACs have better effectiveness for stroke prevention and similar safety compared with warfarin in patients on concomitant anti-tuberculosis treatment. This is the first study assessing the safety and effectiveness of NOACs compared to warfarin in this clinical scenario.

Re-bleeding and all-cause mortality risk in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: focusing on patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy

OBJECTIVE

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) may be fatal; however, little is known about re-bleeding and all-cause mortality after successful hemostasis. We investigated the clinical characteristics and risk factors for re-bleeding and death after successful hemostasis.

METHODS

Patients receiving OACs and diagnosed with NVUGIB between 2007 and 2021 were enrolled. All NVUGIB incidents were confirmed if definite bleeding in the upper gastrointestinal tract was detected via esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients receiving OACs were diagnosed with NVUGIB. Males were the majority (72, 54.5%), and bleeding was detected mostly in the stomach (99, 75%) and was most often due to peptic ulcers (PU) (88, 66.7%). After successful hemostasis of index NVUGIB, 40 patients (30.3%) experienced re-bleeding. Among them, 15 (37.5%) died, and among those, 3 (2.3%) were related to re-bleeding. Multivariate analysis revealed that duodenal bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 3.305; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.152-9.479, p = 0.026) and Charlson comorbidity index score (CCI) (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.052-1.419, p = 0.009) were significant risk factors for re-bleeding. Index albumin levels (OR: 0.134; 95% CI: 0.035-0.506, p = 0.003), previous PU or upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) history (OR: 4.626; 95% CI: 1.375-15.567, p = 0.013), and CCI (OR: 1.293; 95% CI: 1.058-1.581, p = 0.012) were related all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

CCI and duodenal bleeding are risk factors for re-bleeding in patients with NVUGIB who were receiving OACs, while low index albumin levels and previous PU and UGIB history are associated with all-cause mortality.

Risk factors of active upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with COVID-19 infection and the effectiveness of PPI prophylaxis

Background

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the most impactful complications in patients hospitalized from COVID-19 infection. Limited study has focused on patients with upper GI bleeding (UGIB). This study aimed to identify the risk factors of patients who were hospitalized from COVID-19 infection and developed UGIB as well as the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prophylaxis in those patients.

Methods

This study was comprised of two phases. The first phase was the retrospective enrollment of patients who were admitted due to COVID-19 infection and developed UGIB between April and August 2021 to evaluate the associated factors of active UGIB. The second phase was a retrospective analysis after PPI prophylaxis protocol from September – October 2021 to assess the benefit of PPI use in those patients.

Results

Of 6,373 patients hospitalized, 43 patients (0.7%) had evidence of UGIB. The majority were male 28 (65.1%) with a mean age of 69.1 ± 11.8 years. Twenty-four of 43 patients (55.8%) needed mechanical ventilation, 35 patients (81.4%) received systemic corticosteroids, and 10 patients (23.3%) were taking anticoagulants for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis. Seven of 43 patients (16%) had active UGIB. There was no significant difference in the number of patients taking antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or steroids and the severity of COVID-19 infection between the two groups. An emergency endoscopy or endoscopic hemostasis were performed in 6/7 (85.7%) patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed two significant factors associated with active UGIB including higher of Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) per point (OR = 7.89; 95%CI 1.03–72.87; p = 0.04) and an absence of PPI use (OR 4.29; 95%CI 1.04–19.51; p = 0.04). After prescribing PPI as a prophylaxis, there was a slightly lower incidence of UGIB (0.6% vs 0.7%) in addition to an absence of active UGIB (0% vs 16%).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that the absence of PPI and higher GBS were significant risk factors for active UGIB which required therapeutic endoscopy in patients with COVID-19 infection. We suggest that short-term PPI prophylaxis should be prescribed in those patients once they need hospitalization regardless of the severity of COVID-19 infection to minimize the severity of UGIB.

Association between Acid-Suppressive Drugs and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Purpose

Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are often prescribed for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, the risk-benefit balance of ASDs prescription for patients with NVAF taking OACs is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between ASDs and clinical outcomes in patients taking OACs for NVAF.

Methods

This study is a subanalysis of an historical registry study from 71 centers in Japan. We included patients taking vitamin K antagonists for NVAF and excluded those with mechanical heart valves or a history of pulmonary thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis. We registered consecutive patients in February 2013 and followed them up until February 2017. The primary outcomes were ischemic events, major bleedings, and all-cause mortality. Ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic stroke comprised the secondary outcomes.

Results

We included 7826 patients with a mean age of 73 years, 5274 (67%) of whom were males. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for ischemic events, major bleedings, and all-cause mortality in the ASD group compared with the no-ASD group were 0.998 (0.78–1.27), 0.98 (0.81–1.18), and 1.22 (1.02–1.47), respectively, while those for ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and hemorrhagic stroke were 0.96 (0.74–1.24), 0.82 (0.36–1.88), and 1.17 (0.69–1.99), respectively.

Conclusions

ASDs were significantly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with NVAF taking OACs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40268-022-00392-5.

Association of direct oral anticoagulant-proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with adverse outcomes: protocol for a population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for primary and secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, there remains controversy about the overall net clinical benefit of PPIs (omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole) when coprescribed with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). Our objective is to explore the risk of clinically relevant events, including bleeding, thromboembolic events and death, in patients prescribed DOACs while taking PPIs versus no PPI.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The protocol describes a retrospective cohort study of all Ontario residents aged 66 years or older with atrial fibrillation and at least one pharmacy dispensation for a DOAC identified using linked administrative healthcare databases covering 2009-2020. Ontario drug benefit dispensation records will be used to ascertain PPI exposure during DOAC therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of clinically relevant bleeding, thrombotic events or all-cause death. A minimum of 520 patients in total with at least one of the components of the composite outcome are needed. Poisson regression with a generalised estimating equation model will be used to calculate the adjusted incidence rate difference, incidence rate ratios 95% CI, adjusting for propensity for PPI use using inverse probability of treatment weights.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research is exempt from REB review under section 45 of Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act. We will report our findings in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal and present them at conferences. The study will provide useful evidence to optimise the coprescription of DOACs and PPIs in practice.

Prevention of nNon-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Acid Suppressants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Whether the use of acid suppressants can reduce non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-related gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains unclear. To systemically evaluate the effect of acid suppressants on the risk of GIB in patients treated with NOACs. All related studies were searched in four databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their establishment to August 10, 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used to identify studies and Stata 16.0 software was used for meta-analysis, including sensitivity and subgroup analysis. Six retrospective cohort studies were included in this study. The use of acid suppressants significantly reduced the GIB risk in patients taking NOACs, with an overall relative risk (RR) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.82; P < 0.001; I² = 56.3%). This trend of reduced risk for GIB in NOACs was more significant in upper GIB (UGIB; RR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.22-0.90; P = 0.025; I² = 71.1%). The reduction was stronger for dabigatran than for rivaroxaban and apixaban. The least reduction in the risk of GIB with acid suppressant co-therapy was rivaroxaban (dabigatran: RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.62; P = <0.001; I² = 39.8%; apixaban: RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84; P = <0.001; I² = 0; rivaroxaban: RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.66-0.81; P = <0.001; I² = 37.6%). The included studies revealed the protective effect of acid suppressants against NOACs-related GIB, especially in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The protective effect was even stronger in patients using dabigatran than in those using Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban).