Risk factors for emerging intraocular inflammation after intravitreal brolucizumab injection for age-related macular degeneration

Flare levels after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate anterior flare intensity (AFI) after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVBr) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to identify the factors associated with the change of AFI after IVBr.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study was conducted at five sites in Japan for patients with DME who underwent a single IVBr. AFI and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured using a laser flare meter and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, respectively, at weeks 0 and 6.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (phakia, 37 eyes; pseudophakia, 28 eyes) were enrolled. Six weeks after IVBr, CRT and best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved (p < 0.0001). AFI (p = 0.0003) and age (p = 0.0054) were significantly higher in patients with pseudophakic eyes than those with phakic eyes. The AFI of the phakic eyes decreased after IVBr (p = 0.043). As the AFI before injection is higher (p = 0.0363) and the age is lower (p = 0.0016), the AFI decreases after IVBr. There was a significant positive correlation between the rates of change in CRT and AFI (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

After IVBr, AFI decreases in phakic eyes but not in pseudophakic eyes. The age, AFI and CRT before injection and changes of CRT are involved in the change in AFI after IVBr.

Long-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A multicentre retrospective real-world study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups.

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes) and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management.

INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF INTRAOCULAR INFLAMMATION AFTER BROLUCIZUMAB TREATMENT IN JAPAN: A Multicenter Age-Related Macular Degeneration Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and its risk factors following intravitreal injections of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Japan.

METHODS

A total of 1,351 Japanese consecutive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were treated with brolucizumab from May 2020 to May 2022 at 14 institutions were examined. The variables analyzed were the number of brolucizumab injections, time to onset of IOI, and risk factors.

RESULTS

Intraocular inflammation developed in 152 eyes (11.3%). Retinal vasculitis and/or retinal occlusion occurred in 53 eyes (3.9%). Ninety-four patients received bilaterally, bilateral IOI occurred in five patients (5.3%). Sixteen eyes (1.2%) had irreversible visual acuity loss and nine eyes (0.67%) had visual loss of three lines or more due to retinal vasculitis and/or retinal occlusion. The cumulative IOI incidence was 4.5%, 10.3%, and 12.2% at 30, 180, and 365 days (1-year), respectively. History of IOI (including retinal vasculitis) and/or retinal occlusion (odds ratio [OR], 5.41; P = 0.0075) and female sex (OR, 1.99; P = 0.0004) were significantly associated with IOI onset.

CONCLUSION

The 1-year cumulative incidence of IOI in Japanese neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients treated with brolucizumab was 12.2%. History of IOI (including retinal vasculitis) and/or retinal occlusion and female sex were significant risk factors.

Laser flare photometry in eyes receiving brolucizumab intravitreal injections for age related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To measure aqueous flare levels in treatment naïve eyes suffering from wet age- related macular degeneration (wAMD) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab.

METHODS

Patients with treatment naïve wAMD in one eye were prospectively enrolled. Flare levels were measured with laser flare photometry at baseline, 1 day and 1 month after each of the 3 monthly injections during the loading phase.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients aged 76.7 ± 6.0 years were enrolled. Flare values were 10.6 ± 3.7 photons/msec at baseline and 12.6 ± 5.8 photons/msec at the last follow up visit, 1 month after the third injection (p = 0.289, repeated measures ANOVA). The mean change in flare after the first injection was 4.2 ± 3.6. photons/msec, 6.6 ± 8.9 photons/msec after the 2nd and 8.6 ± 20.8 photons/msec after the 3rd injection (p = 0.640, repeated measures ANOVA). No patient had clinical signs of intraocular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes receiving brolucizumab injections for wAMD showed similar flare at baseline, during and 1 month after completion of three-monthly intravitreal injections. There was no evidence of subclinical inflammation during the loading phase of brolucizumab based on laser flare photometry measurements.

Adverse events associated with brolucizumab: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

The safety information of brolucizumab primarily comes from clinical trials experience. This study aimed to explore the ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs) associated with brolucizumab among real-world patients through data mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

AE reports submitted to the FAERS database between October 2019 and March 2023 were extracted. The reporting odds ratio was used to evaluate AE signals associated with brolucizumab.

RESULTS

There were 4,380,839 AE reports extracted from the FAERS database, and 3,313 of which were with brolucizumab as primary suspected. A total of 150 ocular AE signals were identified. Ninety-nine were known ocular AEs listed in brolucizumab' label, primarily including vision-related AEs, intraocular infections, and retinal disorders. Fifty-one were unexpected ocular AE signals, including keratic precipitates, retinal perivascular sheathing, dry eye, glaucoma, etc. Meanwhile, several serious systemic AE signals, including arterial thromboembolic events and rhinorrhea, were also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Several unexpected ocular and systemic AE signals associated with brolucizumab were identified through data mining of the FAERS database.

Comparison of functional and morphologic changes between brolucizumab and faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare functional and morphologic changes in the loading phase between patients with treatment-naïve macular neovascularization (MNV) due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with either intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) or intravitreal faricimab (IVF) injections in a clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 92 consecutive eyes of 90 patients with neovascular nAMD who were scheduled to receive IVBr (42 eyes of 41 patients) or IVF (50 eyes of 49 patients) injections between October 2021 and December 2022. All patients received three consecutive monthly injections of 6.0 mg/0.05 mL brolucizumab or 6.0 mg/0.05 mL faricimab. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) at baseline and 1, 2, and 4 months after the initial treatment were measured and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eyes in IVBr group and forty-seven eyes in IVF group who finished treatments in the loading phase were assessed at the follow-up examination. The BCVA, CFT, and CCT changed significantly after loading phase in both groups (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). The IVBr group had more rapid improvement of the BCVA (P = 0.037) at 1 month than the IVF group, but there was no difference at 4 months (P = 0.367). The CFT and CCT decreases tended to be greater in the IVBr group than in the IVF group throughout the follow-up period. Of the five eyes excluded from the IVBr group, one eye (2.4%) each had intraocular inflammation (IOI) and was a non-responder, and two eyes (4.8%) had retinal pigment epithelial tears after treatment. Of the three eyes excluded from the IVF group, two eyes (4.0%) did not respond to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IVBr and IVF injections were well-tolerated and improved the VA in treatment-naïve patients with MNV due to nAMD after a loading phase, although IVBr caused a trend toward faster visual improvements in the BCVA. The IVBr group also had greater reductions of the CFT and CCT than the IVF group. However, the potential for adverse events and no response to treatment with each drug are considerations.

Factors Associated With Intraocular Inflammation in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients Treated With Brolucizumab

Purpose

To identify factors associated with intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with brolucizumab.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we collected aqueous humor samples from 96 eyes of 96 patients receiving treatment with brolucizumab; IOI subsequently developed in 19 eyes of 19 patients. To identify cytokines upregulated in eyes with subsequent development of IOI, we compared the aqueous humor cytokine levels between the IOI and non-IOI groups. We also collected plasma from 20 patients who developed IOI and 20 age- and sex-matched controls to identify differences in plasma biomarkers and the subfraction of CD4+ cells. Using stepwise variable selection and multivariate binary regression analysis, we developed an algorithm that accurately assessed the likelihood of IOI occurrence.

Results

The IOI group showed elevated aqueous humor levels of P-selectin (584 vs. 324 pg/mL, P = 0.013), TNF-α (0.89 vs. 0.60 pg/mL, P = 0.018), and IL-1α (2.0 vs. 1.4 pg/mL, P = 0.035) compared with the non-IOI group. Serum MMP-9 concentrations were higher in the IOI group than the non-IOI group (18,310 vs. 13,450 pg/mL, P = 0.029). Furthermore, the percentage of Th2 cells was significantly decreased in the IOI compared with the non-IOI group (3.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.013). The receiver operating characteristic curves for the optimal models showed an area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.89, indicating good performance.

Conclusions

The combination of elevated concentrations of multiple aqueous humor cytokines and of serum MMP-9 and a lower number of plasma Th2 cells is associated with brolucizumab-related IOI in patients with nAMD.

Baseline characteristics associated with the incidence of intraocular inflammation after the intravitreous injection of brolucizumab

PURPOSE

To investigate baseline characteristics associated with the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after the intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVBr) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 66 eyes of 62 consecutive patients with nAMD who received IVBr (18 eyes were treatment naïve and 48 eyes had switched from other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] therapy). Baseline clinical characteristics were compared in non-IOI and IOI groups.

RESULTS

Although a dry macula was achieved at a high rate even 6 months after IVBr, IOI occurred in 8 of 66 eyes (12.1%; all had switched therapy) during the study period. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, nAMD type, lens status, visual acuity, central macular thickness, and a history of diabetes did not differ between the groups. The number of previous anti-VEGF injections before IVBr was greater in the IOI group (P = 0.004), and the ratio of patients with a laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP) value over 15 photon count per millisecond (pc/ms) was higher in the IOI group (P = 0.017). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a greater number of previous anti-VEGF injections (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12, P = 0.006; area under the curve: 0.82, cut-off score: 14.0) and an LFCP value over 15 pc/ms (OR: 81.6, P = 0.031) were significantly associated with the incidence of IOI after IVBr.

CONCLUSION

A number of previous anti-VEGF injections greater than 14 and an LFCP value more than 15 pc/ms might be useful predictors of the incidence of IOI after IVBr in eyes with nAMD.

Short-term Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection for Treatment-Naive Exudate Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To compare short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab injection with aflibercept in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 59 eyes from 59 treatment-naive nAMD patients in three hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Of which, 27 patients underwent intravitreal brolucizumab injections and 32 received aflibercept. After monthly consecutive three injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]), central macular thickness (CMT), dry macula achievement rate, and intraocular inflammation (IOI) incidence were compared.

RESULTS

After loading-phase treatment, BCVA was significantly increased from 0.48 ± 0.30 logMAR at baseline to 0.33 ± 0.21 logMAR at 3 months in the brolucizumab group (p = 0.002) and 0.40 ± 0.39 logMAR at baseline to 0.33 ± 0.36 logMAR at 3 months in the aflibercept group (p = 0.007). But there was no significant difference in BCVA improvement at 3 months between the two groups. CMT significantly decreased from 429.67 ± 250.59 μm at baseline to 210.67 ± 93.53 μm at 3 months in the brolucizumab group and from 346.69 ± 159.09 μm to 234.52 ± 83.42 μm in the aflibercept group (both p < 0.001). The amount of CMT reduction was significantly greater in the brolucizumab group after 3 months (p = 0.036). In typical AMD eyes, brolucizumab showed similar BCVA improvement but better CMT reduction at 3 months (p = 0.018). Dry macula achievement rate was not significantly different between the two groups. One IOI was observed in the brolucizumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injections of brolucizumab and aflibercept showed similar anatomical and functional outcomes. But CMT reduction was greater in the brolucizumab group. One IOI was identified, which was tolerable for topical agents. These results suggest that brolucizumab could be a novel first line treatment option for treating naive nAMD patients.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Brolucizumab: An 8-Month Post-Marketing Surveillance Analysis

Importance

Brolucizumab (Beovu®) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Brolucizumab was marketed for its noninferiority to aflibercept and its potential for greater durability. However, post-marketing utilization has been tempered by safety concerns.

Objective

We evaluate the visual and anatomic efficacy of brolucizumab, examine changes in treatment intervals after switching to brolucizumab, and estimate the incidence of drug-related adverse events in the real world.

Design Setting and Participants

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 626 eyes (543 patients) with nvAMD treated with 1438 brolucizumab injections at a single retina practice between 10/1/2019 and 5/15/2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Changes in visual acuity (VA); anatomic outcomes assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) including central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and serous pigment epithelial detachment (sPED) on foveal line scans; treatment intervals before and after receiving brolucizumab; and the incidence of brolucizumab-related adverse events.

Results

The majority of eyes (N = 531, 89.7%) had received prior anti-VEGF therapy with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab. VA improved in treatment-naïve eyes (+3.7 letters, p = 0.04), and was maintained in previously treated eyes. There were significant improvements in all anatomic outcomes in both groups (p < 0.001). We observed a 4.8% incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) and a 0.6% incidence of retinal vasculitis. The average treatment interval increased from 6.3 to 6.8 weeks (p = 0.001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Brolucizumab treatment was associated with VA improvement in naïve eyes and maintenance of VA in previously treated eyes. Switching to brolucizumab was associated with improved anatomic outcomes and extended treatment intervals in most eyes. We observed a similar incidence of IOI and a lower incidence of retinal vasculitis compared to the Safety Review Committee's analysis of HAWK and HARRIER.

Clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation following intravitreal brolucizumab as switching therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to explore the clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) administration for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 eyes from 87 Japanese patients with nAMD who were followed up for 5 months after the initial administration of IVBr as switching therapy. Clinical pictures of IOI post-IVBr and changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 5 months were evaluated between eyes with and without IOI (non-IOI). The association between IOI and baseline factors (age, sex, BCVA, hypertension, and/or arteriosclerotic changes in the fundus, subretinal hyperreflective material [SHRM], and macular atrophy) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 87 eyes, 18 (20.6%) developed IOI and 2 (2.3%) developed retinal artery occlusion. There were 9 (50%) cases of posterior or pan-uveitis among eyes with IOI. The mean interval from initial IVBr administration to IOI was 2 months. The mean changes in logMAR BCVA at 5 months were significantly worse in IOI eyes than in non-IOI eyes (0.09 ± 0.22 vs. - 0.01 ± 0.15, P = 0.03). There were 8 (44.4%) and 7 (10.1%) cases of macular atrophy and 11 (61.1%) and 13 (18.8%) cases of SHRM in the IOI and non-IOI groups, respectively. SHRM and macular atrophy were significantly associated with IOI (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In IVBr therapy for nAMD, eyes with SHRM and/or macular atrophy should be observed more meticulously, given the increased risk of developing IOI, which is associated with insufficient BCVA gain.

Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD (nAMD), if these were reported in detail. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, and CENTRAL using the following search terms: <Brolucizumab> AND <AMD> AND <intraocular inflammation>. The risk of bias was rated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. We included 31 reports (41 patients and 46 eyes). Patients were 75.9 ± 8.5 years, and 58.5% were female. IOI occurred 41.7 ± 37.5 (median 37.0) days after treatment initiation with 2.0 ± 1.3 (1-6) IVB injections. A mean change in visual acuity of -14.6 ± 21.0 (median -6.5) letters was reported. The mean time from first IOI signs to the initiation of any anti-inflammatory treatment was 3.3 ± 6.2 days, with 63% of the patients receiving systemic corticosteroids as standard treatment. Finally, a period effect was observed, with a change in visual acuity of -25.3 ± 27.1 and -2.6 ± 7.3 letters in the chronologically first and last third, respectively, of treated eyes (effect size: r = 0.71; p = 0.006). Functional outcomes markedly improved with increasing experience in managing IOI.

RETINAL VASCULITIS OR VASCULAR OCCLUSION AFTER BROLUCIZUMAB FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence

PURPOSE

Retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion (RV/RO) have been reported after brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This systematic literature review evaluated RV/RO events after brolucizumab in real-world practice.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches identified 89 publications; 19 were included.

RESULTS

Publications described 63 patients (70 eyes) with an RV/RO event following brolucizumab. Mean age was 77.6 years and 77.8% of patients were women; 32 eyes (45.7%) received one brolucizumab injection before RV/RO. Mean (range) time to event from last brolucizumab injection was 19.4 (0-63) days, with 87.5% of events occurring within 30 days. Among eyes with preevent and postevent visual acuity (VA) assessments, 22/42 eyes (52.4%) showed unchanged (±0.08 logMAR) or improved vision from last recorded preevent assessment at latest follow-up, whereas 15/42 eyes (35.7%) showed ≥0.30 logMAR (≥15 letters) VA reduction. Patients with no VA loss were on average slightly younger and had a higher proportion of nonocclusive events.

CONCLUSION

Most RV/RO events reported after brolucizumab in early real-world practice occurred in women. Among eyes with VA measurements, approximately half experienced VA loss; overall, about one-third had VA reduction of ≥0.30 logMAR at latest follow-up, with indications of regional variations.

Comparison of one-year outcomes between as-needed brolucizumab and aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

PURPOSE

To compare the one-year visual and anatomic outcomes of an as-needed regimen of brolucizumab and aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review was performed for consecutive 56 eyes from 56 patients with PCV initially treated with thee monthly intravitreal aflibercept (n = 33, 2.0 mg/0.05 ml) or brolucizumab (n = 23, 6.0 mg/0.05 ml) followed by as-needed administration, followed up for at least 12 months. All patients were followed up monthly, and fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were performed at baseline, 3-month, and 12-month visits.

RESULTS

At the 12-month visit, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.30 ± 0.31 to 0.21 ± 0.29 (p = 0.042) in the brolucizumab-treated group and from 0.24 ± 0.25 to 0.14 ± 0.25 (p = 7.7×10^-3) in the aflibercept-treated group, suggesting comparable visual improvement in both groups. Central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased by 38.4% and 14.2%, respectively, in the brolucizumab-treated group and by 34.8% and 13.9%, respectively, in the aflibercept-treated group at the 12-month visit. The mean number of additional injections was significantly higher in the aflibercept-treated group (2.9 ± 2.7) than in the brolucizumab-treated group (1.3 ± 1.2, p = 0.045). The complete resolution of polypoidal lesions on ICGA was higher in the brolucizumab-treated group than in the aflibercept-treated group (3-month visit: 56.5% vs 30.3%, 12-month visit: 56.5% vs 30.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment-naïve eyes with PCV, the as-needed administration regimen of brolucizumab was comparable to aflibercept in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes, with fewer additional injections during the 12-month follow-up.

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab, Aflibercept, and Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Patients with Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Key clinical guidelines recommend anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy as first-line treatment for visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO). A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted comparing the relative efficacy of the anti-VEGF brolucizumab with a focused network of the most relevant comparator dosing regimens approved in countries other than the USA (aflibercept, ranibizumab). The safety and tolerability of brolucizumab were also assessed.

METHODS

A broad SLR was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials to ensure all relevant potential comparators were captured. Identified studies were refined to those appropriate for inclusion in the NMA. A Bayesian NMA was conducted comparing brolucizumab 6 mg (every 12 [Q12W]/every 8 weeks [Q8W]) with relevant aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg regimens.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in the NMA. At 1-year follow-up, the various aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg regimens were mostly comparable with brolucizumab 6 mg Q12W/Q8W across key visual and anatomical outcomes, except brolucizumab 6 mg was favoured over ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) for the change from baseline (CFB) in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and BCVA loss/gain of pre-specified numbers of letters, and over ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata for CFB in diabetic retinopathy severity scale, and retinal thickness. At year 2, where data were available, brolucizumab 6 mg showed similar results across efficacy outcomes versus all other anti-VEGFs. In most cases, discontinuation rates (all cause, and due to adverse events [AE]) and serious and overall rates of AEs excluding ocular inflammatory events were similar (in unpooled and pooled-treatment analyses) versus comparators.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab 6 mg Q12W/Q8W was comparable or superior to aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg regimens for various visual and anatomical efficacy outcomes and discontinuation rates.

Incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of Intraocular inflammation following Brolucizumab in Indian eyes - A multicentric study

Purpose

To report the incidence, clinical features, potential risk factors, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following brolucizumab in Indian eyes.

Methods

All consecutive patients diagnosed with brolucizumab-induced IOI from 10 centers in eastern India between October 2020 and April 2022 were included.

Results

Of 758 injections given during the study period across centers, 13 IOI events (1.7%) were recorded attributable to brolucizumab. The IOI occurred after the first dose in two eyes (15%) (median 45 days after brolucizumab), second dose in six eyes (46%) (median = 8.5 days), and third dose (39%) in the remaining five eyes (median 7 days). Reinjections of brolucizumab were administered at a median interval of 6 weeks (interquartile range = 4-10 weeks) in the 11 eyes, where IOI occurred after the second or third dose. Eyes that experienced IOI after the third dose had received a significantly greater number of previous antivascular endothelial growth factor injections (median = 8) compared to those who developed it after the first or second dose (median = 4) (P = 0.001). Anterior chamber cells were seen in almost all eyes (n = 11, 85%), while peripheral retinal hemorrhages were seen in two eyes, and one eye showed branch artery occlusion. Two-thirds of patients (n = 8, 62%) recovered with a combination of topical and oral steroids, while remaining recovered with topical steroids alone. Irreversible visual loss was not seen in any eye, and median vision recovered to pre-IOI levels by 3 months' time point.

Conclusion

Brolucizumab-induced IOI was relatively rare, occurring in 1.7% of eyes, was more common after the second or third injection, especially in those who required frequent reinjections every 6 weeks, and occurred earlier with increasing number of previous brolucizumab injections. Continued surveillance is necessary even after repeated doses of brolucizumab.

A Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Aflibercept: A 12-Month Result

We aimed to investigate whether a treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal brolucizumab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL) is effective for eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) refractory to aflibercept for 12 months. Sixty eyes from 56 patients receiving brolucizumab for exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept were included. Patients received a mean of 30.1 aflibercept administrations for a mean 67.9-month follow-up. All patients exhibited exudation on optical coherence tomography (OCT) despite regular 4-8 weeks of aflibercept administration. Visit 1 was scheduled at the same interval from the last aflibercept injection to the baseline. The treatment interval was extended or shortened by 1-2 weeks depending on the presence or absence of exudation on OCT. After switching to brolucizumab, the follow-up interval significantly extended at 12 months (before switching: 7.6 ± 3.8 weeks vs. at 12 months: 12.1 ± 6.2 weeks, p = 1.3 × 10^-7). Forty-three percent of the eyes achieved a dry macula at 12 months after switching. However, the best-corrected visual acuity did not improve at any visit. Morphologically, the central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased from baseline at 12 months (p = 3.6 × 10^-3 and 1.0 × 10^-3, respectively). Switching to brolucizumab can be considered to extend the treatment interval in eyes with exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept.

Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Major Studies and Real-World Data

Frequent antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often lead to poor compliance and suboptimal outcomes. A longer-acting agent has been a pressing unmet need until recently. Brolucizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor agent, is a single-chain antibody fragment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 8, 2019, for treating nAMD. It delivers more molecules at equivalent volumes of aflibercept, thus achieving a longer-lasting effect. We reviewed literature published in English between January 2016 and October 2022 from MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, and Google scholar using the keywords: "Brolucizumab, real-world data, intraocular inflammation (IOI), safety, and efficacy". Brolucizumab showed reduced injection frequency, better anatomic outcomes, and noninferior vision gains compared with aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER studies. However, post hoc studies on brolucizumab revealed a higher-than-expected incidence of IOI, leading to the early termination of 3 studies: MERLIN, RAPTOR, and RAVEN for nAMD, branch retinal vein occlusion, and central retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Contrastingly real-world data showed encouraging outcomes in terms of fewer IOI cases. The subsequent amendment of the treatment protocol resulted in reduced IOI. Thereafter US FDA approved its use in diabetic macular edema on June 1, 2022. Based on major studies and real-world data, this review shows that brolucizumab is effective for treating naive and refractory nAMD. The risk of IOI is acceptable and manageable, but proper preinjection screening and high-vigilance care of IOI are needed. More studies are warranted to evaluate further the incidence, best prevention, and treatment measures for IOI.

Marked Choroidal Thinning Observed after Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection

Introduction

Here, we report a case of severe intraocular inflammation (IOI) and prominent choroidal thinning following the initial intravitreal brolucizumab injection (IVBr).

Case Presentation

The patient was a 75-year-old Japanese man with type 2 age-related macular degeneration of both eyes. Until 2015, he had undergone two intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections and two photodynamic therapies in his right eye. His decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.1 in the right eye and 0.1 in the left eye. Central choroidal thickness (CCT) measured 240 μm in his right eye. IVBr was administered to the right eye. The patient reported pain in the right eye 23 days after the injection. On day 26, panuveitis and retinal vasculitis were observed in the right eye. CCT measured 436 μm. On the same day, a sub-tenon triamcinolone injection was administered. On day 42, retinal inflammation remained at a similar level. The CCT decreased to 164 μm. On day 68, the intraocular pressure (IOP) in the right eye increased to 39 mm Hg, and IOI persisted. On day 89, the patient's eye pain disappeared, and the IOP decreased to 13 mm Hg. On day 225, the IOI and symptoms were completely resolved. The decimal BCVA was 0.04 in the right eye, and CCT measured 84 μm.

Conclusion

Brolucizumab is a highly effective anti-VEGF drug; however, it has the potential to induce inflammation in tissues adjacent to the retina and may occasionally cause irreversible sequelae.

Retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis after multiple intravitreal brolucizumab injections for diabetic macular edema

Purpose

To describe a case of unilateral retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis after multiple intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) treatments for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Observations

A 68-year-old Japanese woman who had a 3-year history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus presented with decreased vision in the right eye (oculus dexter, OD). After two consecutive IVBr (3 mg) treatments for DME, spaced 6 weeks apart, her best corrected visual acuity improved from 20/32 to 20/28 OD, as central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 368 μm to 253 μm on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Immediately after the 3rd IVBr, the right intraocular pressure (IOP) increased. One week later, iritis (aqueous flares: 65.0 photon count [PC]/ms) was observed, followed by localized vasculitis 2 weeks later. One month after the 3rd IVBr, extensive vasculitis and vasculitis occluding retinal arterioles were identified. Based on the history of IVBr use and clinical findings, intraocular inflammation (IOI) and subsequent retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis due to IVBr was diagnosed. Topical steroid administration (i.e., eye drops and subtenon injection) resulted in improvement of IOI after 3 months. She subsequently underwent two intravitreal aflibercept injections for DME and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) to prevent the development of proliferative changes due to diabetic retinopathy. One year after the diagnosis of retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis, the patient had slight loss of vision (20/50) compared to baseline, due to the progression of cataracts, and OCT angiography (OCTA) showed extensive non-perfusion area on the temporal side. However, other examination findings (IOP: 16 mmHg, aqueous flares: 30.5 PC/ms, CMT: 283 μm) were stable.

Conclusions and importance

Diagnosis and treatment at a relatively early stage after the onset of IOI prevented severe visual impairment in this case. Topical betamethasone eye drops reduced anterior chamber inflammation associated with IVBr; however, vascular sheathing worsened when topical drops alone was used. Occlusive retinal vasculitis, diagnosed with fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCTA, appeared to stabilize when subtenon triamcinolone injection was added to topical steroid administration. Because the central macula was not involved, severe vision loss was prevented. It is unknown if topical steroid administration would be adequate to prevent worsening of occlusive vasculitis in other cases. Although not used in this case, oral prednisone is one treatment option that may prevent severe vision loss. However, it requires monitoring of side effects, such as elevated blood glucose levels. PRP is also an option in cases where progression of proliferative changes is a concern, as was done in this case. With these considerations in mind, it is important to diagnose brolucizumab-associated IOI and subsequent retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis in DME patients early and initiate treatment to prevent severe visual impairment. Diagnosing new IOI and subsequent retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis is more difficult in DME than in neovascular age-related macular degeneration because of the inflammatory component often associated vascular occlusions. Therefore, early IOI diagnosis and follow-up using various instruments such as laser flare cell meter, wide-field color imaging, OCT/OCTA, and FA, in addition to usual comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations, is crucial.

A case of intraocular inflammation after intravitreal brolucizumab injection monitored by laser flare-cell photometer

Purpose

To report the efficacy of combination therapy using intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVbr) and sub-Tenon's injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) and of monitoring with a laser flare-cell photometer (LFP) in a case of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with intraocular inflammation (IOI).

Observations

A 72-year-old Japanese woman with PCV had her treatment switched to IVbr due to being refractory to aflibercept. Two weeks after starting IVbr, her visual acuity (VA) declined to 0.40 from 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA at baseline. In addition, the LFP flare increased to 51.2 photon count/ms (pc/ms) compared with the baseline of 16.1 pc/ms. We diagnosed her with the onset of IOI and immediately started treatment with sub-Tenon's injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide (STTA). Two weeks after receiving STTA, her VA had recovered to 0.15 logMAR, and the LFP flare had decreased to 17.9 pc/ms with dry macula. Eight weeks after the first IVbr treatment, the logMAR VA had improved to −0.18 with achievement of dry macula and stabilization of the LFP flare at 12.2 pc/ms. We administered combined therapy using IVbr and STTA to our patient, and 12 weeks later, the logMAR VA remained at 0.00 with dry macula and 18.1 pc/ms for LFP flare. We continued combination therapy, and after 8 months, her logMAR VA remained at −0.08, and optical coherence tomography showed dry macula, while the LFP flare had stabilized at 16.6 pc/ms.

Conclusions and Importance

Combination therapy of IVbr and STTA stabilized IOI and achieved dry macula. The LFP flare score clearly showed the degree of and changes in inflammation.

Comparison of the regressive effects of aflibercept and brolucizumab on pigment epithelial detachment

Background

To compare the regressive effects of aflibercept and brolucizumab on pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in age-related macular degeneration.

Methods

Eighty-three eyes of 83 patients diagnosed with type 1 macular neovascularization were included and retrospectively analysed using multimodal imaging. Forty-nine eyes were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IVA group), and 34 eyes were treated with brolucizumab (IVBr group), with three consecutive injections administered as induction therapy. Before treatment and 1, 2, and 3 months after the first treatment, the maximum height (MH) and maximum diameter (MD) of the PED were measured using optical coherence tomography in each treatment group.

Results

In the IVA group, MH at baseline (228 ± 169 μm) diminished to 180 ± 150 (P = 0.2558), 165 ± 140 (P = 0.0962), and 150 ± 129 µm (P = 0.0284) at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively; the reduction at 3 months was significant. In contrast, in the IVBr group, the MH was 307 ± 254 µm before treatment, and it decreased to 183 ± 156 µm (P = 0.0113), 139 ± 114 µm (P = 0.0003), and 125 ± 126 µm (P < 0.0001) at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, respectively, and the reduction at 1 month was significant. In both groups, the MD did not regress significantly.

Conclusions

The results suggested that the MH of PED after IVBr treatment regressed faster than that after IVA treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02617-2.

Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion represent some of the commonest degenerative conditions that lead to severe vision impairment in the developed countries. The gold standard treatment of complications associated with these conditions is the intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Brolucizumab is a newly developed, humanised, single-chain fragment of a monoclonal antibody binding all VEGF-A isoforms, which was recently approved for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal brolucizumab promises to reduce treatment burden for nAMD patients by achieving comparable therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. Promising also appears its use for the treatment of more challenging maculopathies like diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of brolucizumab and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of degenerative macular disorders.

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal medication injections represent the gold standard treatment for a variety of potentially blinding chorioretinal vascular diseases. Despite their excellent safety profile, they are associated with the feared complication of injection-related endophthalmitis (IRE). Though the overall incidence of IRE is low, due to the ever-increasing number of injections being performed, it is a complication that all retina specialists are likely to encounter. This article reviews various factors that could potentially influence the risk of IRE and discusses evidence-based strategies for management.

METHOD

PubMed was searched for keywords "intravitreal injection" and "endophthalmitis" from the period of 1995-2021. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected articles were analyzed with respect to the incidence, potential preventive factors, clinical presentation, microbial profile, management, and outcomes for IRE.

RESULTS

There is strong consensus supporting the use of povidone iodine topical antiseptic, eyelid retraction away from the injection site, and avoiding treatment of eyes with active surface or eyelid disease, but there is less agreement on the use of face masks versus "no-talking" policies and optimal anesthetic technique. Current evidence comparing tap and inject or early vitrectomy for treatment of IRE is inadequate to determine an optimal treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injections are sight saving, but even using established prophylactic measures there remains a small but real risk of infectious injection-related complications. Further investigations comparing tap and inject versus vitrectomy may help to establish optimal treatment, although the rarity of IRE makes designing adequately powered prospective trials a difficult task.

One-year results of treat-and-extend regimen with intravitreal brolucizumab for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration with type 1 macular neovascularization

We evaluated 1-year outcomes of loading phase treatment followed by maintenance treatment using a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with intravitreal brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) associated with type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV). We analyzed 68 eyes of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-naïve nAMD associated with type 1 MNV. Forty-five eyes (66.2%) completed the 1-year treatment with intravitreal brolucizumab. In those cases, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) showed significant improvement, while there were significant reductions in foveal thickness and central choroidal thickness, after the initial brolucizumab injection, which were maintained until the last visit. The average total number of injections over 1 year was 6.4 ± 0.6. The average intended injection interval at the last visit was 14.0 ± 2.9 weeks. Moreover, 17of 23 eyes (73.9%) with polypoidal lesions showed complete regression of these lesions after the loading phase treatment. Although intraocular inflammation (IOI) was observed in 15 of 68 eyes (22.1%) within 1 year, amelioration in response to combination therapy with topical and subtenon injection of steroids, without visual decline, was obtained. These results indicate that loading phase treatment followed by the TAE regimen with intravitreal brolucizumab might improve BCVA and ameliorate exudative changes in eyes with treatment-naïve nAMD associated with type 1 MNV. Moreover, intravitreal brolucizumab can potentially reduce the treatment burden of nAMD. Prompt steroid therapy might be efficacious for ameliorating brolucizumab-related IOI without visual decline.

Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD): A Review of Emerging Treatment Options

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a common world-wide cause of visual loss. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are an effective means to treat nAMD and reduce its impact on vision compared to either sham treatment or photodynamic therapy. Currently, the approved anti-VEGF drugs include ranibizumab, aflibercept and brolucizumab. In addition, bevacizumab, used as an off-label drug, and has been shown to be effective in treating nAMD. While anti-VEGF agents are effective, its limitations include the requirement for frequent, often monthly injections, and the need for long-term treatment of nAMD. These present significant burdens on the healthcare system and on the patients. In addition, reviews of patients with nAMD treated with anti-VEGF have reported deterioration of vision over time with progression of geographic atrophy. These limitations are partly addressed by exploring different treatment regimens that reduce the frequency of treatments. Newer anti-VEGF drugs have been shown in Phase III clinical trials to have injection intervals as long as 12 or even 16 weeks for a proportion of patients. There is research on newer drugs that affect other pathways, such as the angiopoietin pathway, which may impact nAMD by extending the treatment interval and reducing the burden of treatment. Other measures include the use of sustained-release implants that release the drug regularly over a period of time, and can be refilled periodically, as well as hydrogel platforms that serve to release the drug. The use of biosimilars will also serve to reduce the cost of treatment for nAMD. A new frontier of gene therapy, primarily targeting genes involved in the transduction of retinal cells to produce anti-VEGF proteins intraocularly, also opens a new avenue of therapeutic approaches that can be used for treatment. This review paper will discuss both current treatment options and the newer treatments under development.