Comment on Immunoassays Developed for Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) in Pregnancy May Not Recognize PAPP-A in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Physiological parameters regulating circulating levels of the IGFBP-4/Stanniocalcin-2/PAPP-A axis

BACKGROUND

Insulin Growth Factor Binding Protein 4 (IGFBP-4), Stanniocalcin-2 (STC-2) and Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) have a well-documented involvement in several physiological functions in humans but predictors of their circulating levels remain largely unknown. We aimed to identify anthropometric and biochemical parameters associated with circulating levels of IGFBP-4/STC-2/PAPP-A axis (ISPa) cross-sectionally and to study their day-night variation and their regulation in response to mixed meal and exercise.

METHODS

One hundred twenty two healthy individuals were evaluated cross-sectionally. Subgroups were subjected to standardized mixed meal ingestion in increasing quantities of 125mL or 250mL, or aerobic exercise for 30min, or day-night rhythm study. Main outcome measurements were circulating IGFBP-4 (total and intact), STC-2 and PAPP-A levels.

RESULTS

In multivariate models, the main predictors of serum total IGFBP-4 were PAPP-A and female gender. Intact IGFBP-4 was positively associated with serum creatinine. Height was inversely and female gender and % of total body fat were positively correlated with STC-2. PAPP-A decreased after ingesting both the 125mL (p=0.03) and 250mL quantities (p=0.001), while total IGFBP-4 was reduced after the 250mL quantity (p=0.001). Exercise increased STC-2 and PAPP-A levels (p<0.001 for both). Intact, and to a lesser extent total, IGFBP-4 displayed a cortisol-like day/night variation.

CONCLUSIONS

We report for the first time anthropometric and physiological modulators of ISPa serum levels in healthy humans.

A Plaque Disruption Index Identifies Patients with Non-STE-Type 1 Myocardial Infarction within 24 Hours of Troponin Positivity

Background

Markers of plaque destabilization and disruption may have a role in identifying non-STE- type 1 Myocardial Infarction in patients presenting with troponin elevation. We hypothesized that a plaque disruption index (PDI) derived from multiple biomarkers and measured within 24 hours from the first detectable troponin in patients with acute non-STE- type 1 MI (NSTEMI-A) will confirm the diagnosis and identify these patients with higher specificity when compared to individual markers and coronary angiography.

Methods

We examined 4 biomarkers of plaque destabilization and disruption: myeloperoxidase (MPO), high-sensitivity interleukin-6, myeloid-related protein 8/14 (MRP8/14) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in 83 consecutive patients in 4 groups: stable non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), stable obstructive CAD, NSTEMI-A (enrolled within 24 hours of troponin positivity), and NSTEMI-L (Late presentation NSTEMI, enrolled beyond the 24 hour limit). The PDI was calculated and the patients’ coronary angiograms were reviewed for evidence of plaque disruption. The diagnostic performance of the PDI and angiography were compared.

Results

Compared to other biomarkers, MPO had the highest specificity (83%) for NSTEMI-A diagnosis (P<0.05). The PDI computed from PAPP-A, MRP8/14 and MPO was higher in NSTEMI-A patients compared to the other three groups (p<0.001) and had the highest diagnostic specificity (87%) with 79% sensitivity and 86% accuracy, which were higher compared to those obtained with MPO, but did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05 for all comparisons). The PDI had higher specificity and accuracy for NSTEMI-A diagnosis compared to coronary angiography (P<0.05).

Conclusions

A PDI measured within 24 hour of troponin positivity has potential to identify subjects with acute Non-ST-elevation type 1 MI. Additional evidence using other marker combinations and investigation in a sufficiently large non-selected cohort is warranted to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the PDI and its potential role in differentiating type 1 and type 2 MI in patients presenting with troponin elevation of uncertain etiology.

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and cardiovascular risk

The search for markers to improve risk prediction for individuals at risk of developing serious cardiovascular events is ongoing. New markers of coronary artery disease progression have been identified in recent years, among which, circulating levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) offer an interesting profile. PAPP-A may play a role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions and represent also a marker of atheromatous plaque instability and extent of cardiovascular disease. PAPP-A has been shown to be a marker of adverse outcome in both acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary disease patients. The present article reviews currently available evidence supporting a role for PAPP-A as a marker of cardiovascular risk and discusses some of the pitfalls that may limit its use in clinical practice.

Measurement and clinical significance of circulating PAPP-A in ACS patients

BACKGROUND

The rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and subsequent thrombus formation are major events underlying acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), a biomarker of plaque rupture, has been studied in patients with ACS. This review aimed to provide an overview of clinical utility of PAPP-A in ACS patients and analytical issues adhering to immunological PAPP-A measurement.

METHODS

The literature relating to PAPP-A in ACS, the molecular structure and immunodetection of PAPP-A was reviewed. PubMed was used to search the relevant articles published from 1974 to 2006.

RESULTS

Higher PAPP-A concentrations have been found in patients with ACS than in patients with stable angina and subjects without coronary artery disease. Elevated PAPP-A concentrations have also been shown to associate with adverse cardiac events in ACS patients. The prognostic value of PAPP-A appears to be independent of cardiac troponins. Noteworthy, the PAPP-A form that accounts for increase in ACS is uncomplexed with the proform of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP). However, PAPP-A assays applied in clinical studies published thus far detect total PAPP-A. Consequently, the clinical value may be non-optimal when total PAPP-A is measured in ACS patients. In addition, the clinical value can also be affected by the analytical factors that exert an effect on the performance of PAPP-A assays.

CONCLUSIONS

PAPP-A appears to be a very promising biomarker useful in the clinical management of ACS patients. However, more prospective and interventional studies with carefully established immunoassays are required to validate its clinical utility.