Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Indicates Risk for 4 Distinct Forms of Vascular Disease

Relationship between lipoprotein(a) and colorectal cancer among inpatients: a retrospective study

The present study was to explore the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and colorectal cancer (CRC) among inpatients. This study included 2822 participants (393 cases vs. 2429 controls) between April 2015 and June 2022. Logistic regression models, smooth curve fitting, and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between Lp(a) and CRC. Compared with the lower Lp(a) quantile 1 (<79.6 mg/L), the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) in quantile 2 (79.6-145.0 mg/L), quantile 3 (146.0-299.0 mg/L), and quantile 4 (≥300.0 mg/L) were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-2.09), 1.54 (95% CI: 1.04-2.27), 1.84 (95% CI: 1.25-2.7), respectively. A linear relationship between lipoprotein(a) and CRC was observed. The finding that Lp(a) has a positive association with CRC supports the "common soil" hypothesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CRC.

Lipoprotein (a) Levels and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have linked high Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) concentrations to cardiovascular events, including the formation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA). We review and meta-analyze existing evidence on the association of Lp(a) levels with AAA.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the link of Lp(a) with AAA, up to December 27th 2021, were identified by a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. The results were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized according to PRISMA guidelines. Results are presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 5,078 subjects (1,637 patients with AAA vs. 3,441 controls) from 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a mean age of 69.9 years and a male sex prevalence of 85.8%. Based on the qualitative synthesis, high Lp(a) concentrations are linked to abdominal aortic wall degradation and extracellular matrix disarrangement. Moreover, despite the considerable variability among races, high Lp(a) levels are related to increased AAA risk, independently of race differences. Accordingly, patients with AAA displayed significantly higher Lp(a) levels compared to controls (SMD: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.55-1.17, p < 0.001). The outcome was not affected in a sensitivity analysis excluding three outlying studies (SMD: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.58, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates the association between high Lp(a) levels and the presence of AAA, although existing literature presents high heterogeneity. Further studies are needed to standardize Lp(a) measurements and to conclude whether Lp(a) can be used as a sensitive biomarker of early presymptomatic AAA diagnosis.

The known unknowns of apolipoprotein glycosylation in health and disease

Apolipoproteins, the protein component of lipoproteins, play an important role in lipid transport, lipoprotein assembly, and receptor recognition. Apolipoproteins are glycosylated and the glycan moieties play an integral role in apolipoprotein function. Changes in apolipoprotein glycosylation correlate with several diseases manifesting in dyslipidemias. Despite their relevance in apolipoprotein function and diseases, the total glycan repertoire of most apolipoproteins remains undefined. This review summarizes the current knowledge and knowledge gaps regarding human apolipoprotein glycan composition, structure, glycosylation site, and functions. Given the relevance of glycosylation to apolipoprotein function, we expect that future studies of apolipoprotein glycosylation will contribute new understanding of disease processes and uncover relevant biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Considering these future efforts, we also provide a brief overview of current mass spectrometry based technologies that can be applied to define detailed glycan structures, site-specific compositions, and the role of emerging approaches for clinical applications in biomarker discovery and personalized medicine.

Lipoprotein (a) level as a risk factor for stroke and its subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of lipoprotein-A [Lp (a)] as a risk factor for stroke is less well documented than for coronary heart disease. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the published observational studies in order to investigate the association of Lp (a) levels with the risk of stroke and its subtypes. In our meta-analysis, 41 studies involving 7874 ischemic stroke (IS) patients and 32,138 controls; 13 studies for the IS subtypes based on TOAST classification and 7 studies with 871 Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cases and 2865 control subjects were included. A significant association between increased levels of Lp (a) and risk of IS as compared to control subjects was observed (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CIs) 0.53-0.99). Lp (a) levels were also found to be significantly associated with the risk of large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype of IS (SMD 0.68; 95% CI 0.01-1.34) as well as significantly associated with the risk of ICH (SMD 0.65; 95% CI 0.13-1.17) as compared to controls. Increased Lp (a) levels could be considered as a predictive marker for identifying individuals who are at risk of developing IS, LAA and ICH.

Lipoprotein(a) levels and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have prospectively examined the associations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels with the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), especially in women. Accounting for commonly recognized risk factors, we investigated the baseline Lp(a) levels and the risk of AAA among postmenopausal women participating in the ongoing national Women's Health Initiative.

METHODS

Women's Health Initiative participants with baseline Lp(a) levels available who were beneficiaries of Medicare parts A and B fee-for-service at study enrollment or who had aged into Medicare at any point were included. Participants with missing covariate data or known AAA at baseline were excluded. Thoracic aneurysms were excluded owing to the different pathophysiology. The AAA cases and interventions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision, codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes from claims data. Hazard ratios were computed using Cox proportional hazard models according to the quintiles of Lp(a).

RESULTS

The mean age of the 6615 participants included in the analysis was 65.3 years. Of the 6615 participants, 66.6% were non-Hispanic white, 18.9% were black, 7% were Hispanic and 4.7% were Asian/Pacific Islander. Compared with the participants in the lowest Lp(a) quintile, those in higher quintiles were more likely to be overweight, black, and former or current smokers, to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cardiovascular disease, and to use menopausal hormone therapy and statins. During 65,476 person-years of follow-up, with a median of 10.4 years, 415 women had been diagnosed with an AAA and 36 had required intervention. More than one half had required intervention for a ruptured AAA. We failed to find a statistically significant association between Lp(a) levels and incident AAA. Additional sensitivity analyses stratified by race, with exclusion of statin users and alternative categorizations of Lp(a) using log-transformed levels, tertiles, and a cutoff of >50 mg/dL, were conducted, which did not reveal any significant associations.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no statistically significant association between Lp(a) levels and the risk of AAA in a large and well-phenotyped sample of postmenopausal women. Women with high Lp(a) levels were more likely to be overweight, black, and former or current smokers, and to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cardiovascular disease, or to use hormone therapy and statins compared with those with lower Lp(a) levels. These findings differ from previous prospective, case-control, and meta-analysis studies that had supported a significant relationship between higher Lp(a) levels and an increased risk of AAA. Differences in the association could have resulted from study limitations or sex differences.

Both Small and Large Infrarenal Aortic Size is Associated with an Increased Prevalence of Ischaemic Heart Disease

OBJECTIVE

Past studies have suggested a potential "J shaped" relationship between infrarenal aortic diameter and both cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence and all cause mortality. However, screening programmes have focused primarily on large (aneurysmal) aortas. In addition, aortic diameter is rarely adjusted for body size, which is particularly important for women. This study aimed to investigate specifically the relationship between body size adjusted infrarenal aortic diameter and baseline prevalence of CVD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 4882 elderly (>50 years) participants (mean age 69.4 ± 8.9 years) for whom duplex ultrasound to assess infrarenal abdominal aortic diameters had been performed. History of CVDs, including ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and associated risk factors were collected at the time of assessment. A derivation cohort of 1668 participants was used to select cut offs at the lower and upper 12.5% tails of the aortic size distributions (aortic size index of <0.84 and >1.2, respectively), which was then tested in a separate cohort.

RESULTS

A significantly elevated prevalence of CVD, and specifically IHD, was observed in participants with both small and large aortas. These associations remained significant following adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity (body mass index), and smoking.

CONCLUSION

The largest and smallest infrarenal aortic sizes were both associated with prevalence of IHD. In addition to identifying those with aneurysmal disease, it is hypothesised that screening programmes examining infrarenal aortic size may also have the potential to improve global CVD risk prediction by identifying those with small aortas.

Apolipoprotein(a), an enigmatic anti-angiogenic glycoprotein in human plasma: A curse or cure?

Angiogenesis is a finely co-ordinated, multi-step developmental process of the new vascular structure. Even though angiogenesis is regularly occurring in physiological events such as embryogenesis, in adults, it is restricted to specific tissue sites where rapid cell-turnover and membrane synthesis occurs. Both excessive and insufficient angiogenesis lead to vascular disorders such as cancer, ocular diseases, diabetic retinopathy, atherosclerosis, intra-uterine growth restriction, ischemic heart disease, stroke etc. Occurrence of altered lipid profile and vascular lipid deposition along with vascular disorders is a hallmark of impaired angiogenesis. Among lipoproteins, lipoprotein(a) needs special attention due to the presence of a multi-kringle protein subunit, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], which is structurally homologous to many naturally occurring anti-angiogenic proteins such as plasminogen and angiostatin. Researchers have constructed different recombinant forms of apo(a) (rhLK68, rhLK8, RHACK2, KV-11, and AU-6) and successfully exploited its potential to inhibit unwanted angiogenesis during tumor metastasis and retinal neovascularization. Similar to naturally occurring anti-angiogenic proteins, apo(a) can directly interfere with angiogenic signaling pathways. Besides this, apo(a) can also exert its anti-angiogenic effect indirectly by inducing endothelial cell apoptosis, by inhibiting endothelial progenitor cell functions or by upregulating nuclear factors in endothelial cells via apo(a)-bound oxPLs. However, the impact of the anti-angiogenic potential of native apo(a) during physiological angiogenesis in embryos and wounded tissues is not yet explored. In this context, we review the studies so far done to demonstrate the anti-angiogenic activity of apo(a) and the recent developments in using apo(a) as a therapeutic agent to treat impaired angiogenesis during vascular disorders, with emphasis on the gaps in the literature.

DNA methylation profiling identifies a high effect genetic variant for lipoprotein(a) levels

Changes in whole blood DNA methylation levels at several CpG sites have been associated with circulating blood lipids, specifically high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides. This study performs a discovery and validation epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) for circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Whole-blood DNA methylation profiles were assessed in a cohort of 1020 elderly individuals using the Illumina EPIC array and independent validation in 359 elderly males using the Illumina 450 k array. Plasma Lp(a) was measured using an apolipoprotein(a)-size-independent ELISA. Epigenome-wide rank regression analysis identified and validated a single CpG site, cg17028067 located in intron 1 of the LPA gene, that was significantly associated with plasma Lp(a) levels after correction for multiple testing. Genotyping of the site identified a relatively uncommon SNP (rs76735376, MAF <0.02) at the CpG site that largely explained the observed methylation effect. Rs76735376 is an expression quantitative trait loci for the LPA gene and could affect expression by altering enhancer activity. This EWAS for plasma Lp(a) identified a single CpG site within LPA. This association is due to an uncommon, but highly effective genetic variant, which was not in significant linkage disequilibrium with other variants known to influence Lp(a) levels or apo(a) isoform size. This study highlights the utility of CpG site methylation to identify potentially important genetic associations that would not be readily apparent in a comparable size genetic association study.

Association of Serum Lipoprotein (a) With the Requirement for a Peripheral Artery Operation and the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in People With Peripheral Artery Disease

Background The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) concentration and the requirement for peripheral artery disease (PAD) operations or incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. Methods and Results A total of 1472 people with PAD presenting with intermittent claudication (n=355), abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=989) or critical limb ischemia (n=128) were prospectively recruited from 4 outpatient clinics in Australia. Lp(a) was measured in serum samples collected at recruitment using an immunoassay. Participants were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 2.4 (0.1-6.1) years to record requirement for any PAD operation, defined to include any open or endovascular PAD intervention (lower limb peripheral revascularization, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, other aneurysm repair, or carotid artery revascularization). Myocardial infarctions, strokes, and deaths were also recorded. The association of Lp(a) with events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for traditional risk factors. Participants with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL had a greater requirement for any PAD operation (hazard ratio, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.02-1.41) and lower limb peripheral revascularization alone (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI, 1.06-1.66) but no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and a 40 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) were also associated with an increased risk of lower limb peripheral revascularization alone but not with other outcomes. Conclusions In participants with PAD referred for hospital management those with high Lp(a) had greater requirement for lower limb peripheral revascularization but Lp(a) was not consistently associated with other clinical events.

Genetics of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Diseases

Dissections or ruptures of aortic aneurysms remain a leading cause of death in the developed world, with the majority of deaths being preventable if individuals at risk are identified and properly managed. Genetic variants predispose individuals to these aortic diseases. In the case of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissections (thoracic aortic disease), genetic data can be used to identify some at-risk individuals and dictate management of the associated vascular disease. For abdominal aortic aneurysms, genetic associations have been identified, which provide insight on the molecular pathogenesis but cannot be used clinically yet to identify individuals at risk for abdominal aortic aneurysms. This compendium will discuss our current understanding of the genetic basis of thoracic aortic disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm disease. Although both diseases share several pathogenic similarities, including proteolytic elastic tissue degeneration and smooth muscle dysfunction, they also have several distinct differences, including population prevalence and modes of inheritance.

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] in coronary artery diseases (CAD) with special clinical background such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has not been fully determined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of Lp(a) to type 2 diabetic patients with or without CAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 2040 consecutive patients with T2DM who received selective coronary angiography (CAG) due to angina-like chest pain were enrolled. The patients were subsequently divided into CAD and non-CAD groups according to the results of CAG. The severity of CAD was evaluated by the Gensini Score (GS), number of stenotic vessels, and history of myocardial infarction (MI). Data showed that Lp(a) levels were higher in the CAD group than in the non-CAD group (median: 15.00 mg/dL vs. 11.88 mg/dL, P = 0.025). The results from CAD subgroup analysis indicated that the patients with MI, multiple-vessel disease and high GS had higher Lp(a) levels compared with those in their matched subgroups (P < 0.05, respectively). After adjustment for confounders, Lp(a) levels were independently related to the presence and severity of CAD (CAD:OR = 1.564; MI:OR = 1.523; high GS:OR = 1.388; multiple-vessel disease:OR = 1.455; P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) levels were independently associated with the presence and severity of CAD in patients with T2DM. More studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

The Combination Therapy of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe Improved Lipid Profile and Vascular Function Compared with Statins in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

AIM

Elevated level of serum triglyceride (TG) is a characteristic of type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the clinical significance of intervention for the serum TG levels in the fasting and postprandial states in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with statins, were selected and divided into two groups. One group was treated with a combination of fenofibrate and ezetimibe (F/E group) and the other group with statins (statin group) for 12 weeks. The lipoprotein profile of both groups was compared using high-performance liquid chromatography, and the vascular function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at the forearm.

RESULTS

The levels of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, malondialdehyde low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL), total TG, chylomicron-TG, VLDL-TG, and HDL-TG decreased in the F/E group, whereas those of HDL cholesterol increased. Furthermore, the peak particle size of LDL increased, but that of HDL decreased in the F/E group. The combination treatment significantly improved the FMD. The change in the cholesterol level in a very small fraction of HDL was a significant independent predictor for determining the improvement of FMD (p＜0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the treatment with statins, the treatment with the combination of fenofibrate and ezetimibe effectively controlled the LDL cholesterol and TG levels, increased the HDL cholesterol level, especially in its small fraction, and improved vascular function of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of three targeted approaches to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to be a significant health burden yet few countries have implemented a comprehensive screening programme. Screening typically places emphasis on men aged over 65 years; however, there is concern that other at-risk groups may be underidentified. The present study examined three potential screening strategies based on cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

The prevalence of AAA was determined by abdominal ultrasound imaging in over 50-year-olds of either sex undergoing coronary angiography, vascular laboratory assessment of peripheral arterial disease, or community-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) event risk assessment. A fourth group, consisting of volunteers aged over 60 years who had no symptoms or signs of cardiovascular disease, was used as a comparator group.

RESULTS

A total AAA prevalence of 4·4 per cent was detected across all three strategies (137 of 3142 individuals), compared with 1·0 per cent in the CVD-free group. Male sex, age and smoking were all associated with greater AAA prevalence. Although AAA prevalence was lowest using the community-based strategy, those with an AAA detected were on average 7 years younger than those with AAAs detected with the other two strategies (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Different strategies, based on CVD risk, resulted in AAA prevalence rates that were significantly greater than that in CVD-free individuals. This may provide opportunities for a targeted approach to community AAA screening in parts of the world where more sophisticated national screening programmes do not exist.

Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Circulating markers relevant to the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are currently required. Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is considered a candidate marker associated with the presence of AAA. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between circulating Lp(a) levels and the presence of AAA. The PubMed-based search was conducted up to April 30, 2015, to identify the studies focusing on Lp(a) levels in patients with AAA and controls. Quantitative data synthesis was performed using a random effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as summary statistics. Overall, 9 studies were identified. After a combined analysis, patients with AAA were found to have a significantly higher level of Lp(a) compared to the controls (SMD: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.41-1.33, P < .001). This result remained robust in the sensitivity analysis, and its significance was not influenced after omitting each of the included studies from the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis confirmed a higher level of circulating Lp(a) in patients with AAA compared to controls. High Lp(a) levels can be associated with the presence of AAA, and Lp(a) may be a marker in screening for AAA. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical utility of measuring Lp(a) in the prevention and management of AAA.

Lipoprotein apheresis results in plaque stabilization and prevention of cardiovascular events: comments on the prospective Pro(a)LiFe study

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as an important independent cardiovascular risk factor, and causal association has been accepted with adverse outcome in atherosclerotic disease. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) can lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and Lp(a) by 60–70 % and is the final escalating therapeutic option in patients with hyperlipoproteinemias (HLP) involving LDL or Lp(a) particles. Major therapeutic effect of LA is preventing cardiovascular events. Stabilizing plaque morphology might be an important underlying mechanism of action. In Germany, since 2008, a reimbursement guideline has been implemented to establish the indication for LA not only for familial or severe forms of hypercholesterolemia but also for Lp(a)-HLP associated with a progressive course of cardiovascular disease, that persists despite effective treatment of other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors, i.e. isolated Lp(a)-HLP. The Pro(a)LiFe-study confirmed with a prospective multicenter design that LA can effectively reduce Lp(a) plasma levels and prevent cardiovascular events.

[Lipoprotein(a): influence on cardiovascular manifestation]

The clinical relevance of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a cardiovascular risk factor is currently underestimated. The aim of our study was to assess the influence of increased Lp(a) values on the development and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).In our retrospective analysis of 31,274 patients, who were hospitalized for the first time, we compared patients with isolated increased Lp(a) (> 110 mg/dl) and normal Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl), with increased Lp(a) concentrations (30-60 mg/dl, 61-90 mg/dl, 91-110 mg/dl), and in a third analysis with additionally increased LDL cholesterol and HbA1c values.Patients with high Lp(a) levels showed a significantly higher incidence of advanced CAD with a three-vessel disease being present in 50.2 vs. 25.1 %. Patients with high Lp(a) levels had a significantly more frequent history of myocardial infarction (34.6 vs. 16.6 %, p < 0.001), surgical myocardial revascularization (40.8 vs. 20.8 %, p < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (55.3 vs. 33.6 %, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a marked difference in gender to the disadvantage of male patients regarding development and severity of CAD. CAD risk (Odds ratio) was increased 5.5-fold in patients with Lp(a) ≥ 110 mg/dl. Additionally elevated LDL and HbA1c levels were not associated with increased manifestation and severity of CAD.High Lp(a) concentration leads to an increased manifestation and severity of coronary artery disease. Additional risk factors do not aggravate manifestation of CAD.

Lipoprotein (a) as a risk factor for ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] harbors atherogenic potential but its role as a risk factor for ischemic stroke remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the relative strength of the association between Lp(a) and ischemic stroke and identify potential subgroup-specific risk differences.

METHODS

A systematic search using the MeSH terms "lipoproteins" OR "lipoprotein a" AND "stroke" was performed in PubMed and ScienceDirect for case-control studies from June 2006 and prospective cohort studies from April 2009 until December 20th 2014. Data from eligible papers published before these dates were reviewed and extracted from previous meta-analyses. Studies that assessed the relationship between Lp(a) levels and ischemic stroke and reported generic data-i.e. odds ratio [OR], hazard ratio, or risk ratio [RR]-were eligible for inclusion. Studies that not distinguish between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack were excluded. Random effects meta-analyses with mixed-effects meta-regression were performed by pooling adjusted OR or RR.

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles comprising 90,904 subjects and 5029 stroke events were eligible for the meta-analysis. Comparing high with low Lp(a) levels, the pooled estimated OR was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.26-1.57) for case-control studies (n = 11) and the pooled estimated RR was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.06-1.58) for prospective studies (n = 9). Sex-specific differences in RR were inconsistent between case-control and prospective studies. Study populations with a mean age of ≤55 years had an increased RR compared to older study populations. Reported Lp(a) contrast levels and ischemic stroke subtype significantly contributed to the heterogeneity observed in the analyses.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke and may be especially relevant for young stroke patients. Sex-specific risk differences remain conflicting. Further studies in these subgroups may be warranted.

Immunopathology of desialylation: human plasma lipoprotein(a) and circulating anti-carbohydrate antibodies form immune complexes that recognize host cells

Human plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], the dominant lipoprotein in atherosclerotic plaques, contains an apo(a) subunit of variable size linked to the apoB subunit of a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) molecule. Circulating lipoprotein immune complexes (ICs) assayed by ELISA using microplate-coated anti-apo(a) or anti-apoB antibody for capture and peroxidase-labelled anti-human immunoglobulins as probe consisted mostly of Lp(a) despite several-fold excess of LDL over Lp(a) in plasma. Microplate coating of plasma lipoprotein IC and probing with antibodies to apo(a) and apoB also revealed negligible presence of LDL compared to Lp(a). Peanut agglutinin specific to desialylated O-glycans bound significantly more to Lp(a) recovered after urea dissociation of IC than to free Lp(a). Plasma lipoproteins separated by ultracentrifugation and desialylated by neuraminidase formed IC with naturally occurring antibodies in normal plasma. These de novo ICs agglutinated desialylated but not normal human RBC in proportion to the polyagglutinin antibody titre of plasma used, suggesting availability of multiple unoccupied binding sites on the participating antibodies even after IC formation. Agglutination was inhibitable by galactosides and decreased 4-8 fold if precursor lipoprotein was selectively depleted of Lp(a), showing agglutinating ICs were contributed mainly by desialylated Lp(a) and galactose-specific antibodies. IC was 2 fold more agglutinating if lipoproteins used contained smaller rather than larger Lp(a) molecules of the same number. Small size/high plasma concentration Lp(a) phenotype and neuraminidase-releasing diseases including diabetes are risk factors for vascular disorders. Results suggest a possible route of Lp(a) attachment to vascular cells that offer terminal galactose on surface glycans following desialylation.

Plasma heat shock protein 27 is associated with coronary artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease

Low protein levels of Hsp27 have been reported in atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, human studies have indicated that circulating Hsp27 levels are lower in coronary artery disease patients compared with controls. It remains, however, unclear whether this applies to other forms of atherosclerotic disease.

Plasma Hsp27 from 280 subjects was examined by ELISA. The cohort included 80 coronary artery disease (CAD), 40 peripheral artery disease (PAD) and 80 abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients. Eighty elderly subjects, without any clinical history of vascular diseases, were used as a control group. Receiver operating curve (ROC) and logistic regression model analysis were performed to evaluate the potential value of Hsp27 as a circulating biomarker.

Patients with atherosclerotic vascular diseases had significantly lower levels of Hsp27 than control subjects (p < 0.001). Moreover, Hsp27 was significantly lower in CAD patients than other atherosclerotic vascular disease groups (p < 0.001). There was no difference in Hsp27 levels between the AAA and PAD groups. Using the ROC-generated optimal cut-off values for Hsp27, logistic regression modeling indicated that low plasma Hsp27 was independently associated with the presence of multiple forms of atherosclerotic disease.

In conclusion, circulating Hsp27 is significantly lower in patients with multiple forms of atherosclerotic arterial disease.

Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of biomarkers for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Many studies have investigated the systemic and local expression of biomarkers in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The natural history of AAA varies between patients, and predictors of the presence and diameter of AAA have not been determined consistently. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of studies comparing biomarkers in patients with and without AAA, with the aim of summarizing the association of identified markers with both AAA presence and size.

Methods and results

Literature review identified 106 studies suitable for inclusion. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference between matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 9, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1, interleukin (IL) 6, C-reactive protein (CRP), α1-antitrypsin, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A and high-density lipoprotein in patients with and without AAA. Although meta-analysis was not possible for MMP-2 in aortic tissue, tumour necrosis factor α, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, interferon γ, intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, systematic review suggested an increase in these biomarkers in patients with AAA. Meta-regression analysis identified a significant positive linear correlation between aortic diameter and CRP level.

Conclusion

A wide variety of biomarkers are dysregulated in patients with AAA, but their clinical value is yet to be established. Future research should focus on the most relevant biomarkers of AAA, and how they could be used clinically.

Plasma anti-α-galactoside antibody binds to serine- and threonine-rich peptide sequence of apo(a) subunit in Lp(a)

Lipoprotein(a) immune complexes [Lp(a) IC] of varying particle density obtained by ultracentrifugation of plasma from normal healthy donors were markedly dominated by IgG. Lp(a) and immunoglobulins were liberated from plasma Lp(a) IC by treatment with melibiose, a sugar specific for circulating anti-α-galactoside antibody (anti-Gal). Upon incubation with plasma lipoprotein fraction anti-Gal but not the α-glucoside-specific antibody from human plasma formed de novo IC with Lp(a). Binding of Lp(a) sugar-reversibly enhanced the fluorescence of FITC-labeled anti-Gal as did binding of α-galactoside-containing glycoproteins. This effect apparently due to conformational shift in the Fc region of the antibody was also produced by apo(a) subunit separated from Lp(a) and de-O-glycosylated apo(a) but not by any other plasma lipoproteins or by Lp(a) pre-incubated with the O-glycan-specific lectin jacalin. O-Glycans and their terminal sialic acid moieties in apo(a) of circulating Lp(a)-anti-Gal IC, in contrast to those in pure Lp(a), were inaccessible to jacalin and anion exchange resin, respectively. Unlike other plasma lipoproteins, Lp(a) inhibited Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4 which also accommodates serine- and threonine-rich peptide sequence (STPS) as surrogate ligand to α-galactosides at its binding site. Results suggest that anti-Gal recognizes STPS in the O-glycan-rich regions of apo(a) subunit in Lp(a) which contains no α-linked galactose.

Lp(a)/apo(a) modulate MMP-9 activation and neutrophil cytokines in vivo in inflammation to regulate leukocyte recruitment

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but the mechanism is unclear. The pathogenic risk of Lp(a) is associated with elevated plasma concentration, small isoforms of apolipoprotein [apo(a)], the unique apolipoprotein of Lp(a), and a mimic of plasminogen. Inflammation is associated with both the initiation and recovery of cardiovascular diseases, and plasminogen plays an important role in leukocyte recruitment. Because Lp(a)/apo(a) is expressed only in primates, transgenic mice were generated, apo(a)tg and Lp(a)tg mice, to determine whether Lp(a)/apo(a) modifies plasminogen-dependent leukocyte recruitment or whether apo(a) has an independent role in vivo. Plasminogen activation was markedly reduced in apo(a)tg and Lp(a)tg mice in both peritonitis and vascular injury inflammatory models, and was sufficient to reduce matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation and macrophage recruitment. Furthermore, neutrophil recruitment and the neutrophil cytokines, CXCL1/CXCL2, were suppressed in apo(a)tg mice in the abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Reconstitution of CXCL1 or CXCL2 restored neutrophil recruitment in apo(a)tg mice. Apo(a) in the plasminogen-deficient background and Lp(a)tg mice were resistant to inhibition of macrophage recruitment that was associated with an increased accumulation of apo(a) in the intimal layer of the vessel wall. These data indicate that, in inflammation, Lp(a)/apo(a) suppresses neutrophil recruitment by plasminogen-independent cytokine inhibition, and Lp(a)/apo(a) inhibits plasminogen activation and regulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation and macrophage recruitment.

Dual specificity of human plasma lactose-binding immunoglobulin to anomers of terminal galactose enables recognition of desialylated lipoprotein(a) and xenoantigens

Human plasma lactose-binding immunoglobulin (LIg) isolated by affinity chromatography on lactose-Sepharose was largely IgG with significant IgA and IgM contents. LIg-mediated agglutination of desialylated human RBC was inhibited equally by the α- and β-anomers of methyl galactoside. Recognition of either the terminal α-galactose (TAG)-containing glycans of bovine thyroglobulin or the N-acetyl lactosamine (LacNAc)-terminating glycans of asialofetuin by LIg was inhibitable nearly as much by the α-galactoside melibiose as by the β-galactoside lactose. Melibiose covalently conjugated to protein and coated on polystyrene wells captured several times more LIg molecules than its lactose analogue. LIg binding to bovine thyroglobulin or rabbit RBC membrane proteins, both bearing TAG was substantially reduced by prior treatment of the proteins with α-galactosidase to remove TAG though enzyme-treated glycans contained newly exposed LacNAc moieties. Desialylated O-linked oligosaccharides, however, were no ligand for LIg. Unlike LDL, plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] coated on polystyrene well and desialylated by neuraminidase was recognized by LIg through terminal LacNAc moieties exposed by the enzyme on its apo(a) subunit. Further, same amount of added fluorescence-labelled LIg formed significantly more immune complex with Lp(a) in high Lp(a) plasma than in low Lp(a) plasma. Results suggest (1) possibility of a role for LIg in combating non-primate molecules and cells bearing TAG moiety and (2) a mechanism for Lp(a)-mediated vascular injury as diabetes, infections and inflammations induce greater release of neuraminidase into circulation.

Human plasma anti-α-galactoside antibody forms immune complex with autologous lipoprotein(a)

Anti-α-galactoside antibody (anti-Gal) from human plasma that bound to α-galactoside-bearing guar galactomannan gel and was eluted with specific sugar (affinity-purified anti-Gal ; APAG) invariably contained apo(a) and apo B subunits in a proportion close to that in plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Since LDL does not contain apo(a), result suggested Lp(a) as a component of APAG. Lp(a) in APAG was complexed with anti-Gal since plate-coated anti-apo(a) captured Lp(a) along with the antibody. Association of Lp(a) with anti-Gal in APAG was considerably lower in presence of anti-Gal-specific sugar, suggesting that Lp(a) occupied the sugar-binding site of anti-Gal. Content of Lp(a)-bound anti-Gal in APAG, though a minor fraction of total antibody, increased steadily with total Lp(a) content of plasma. Further, Lp(a) released from immune complex-rich fraction of plasma by anti-Gal- specific sugar was proportional to total plasma Lp(a). Anti-Gal titre decreased with increasing Lp(a) concentration among 114 plasma samples. Results indicate the potential of anti-Gal molecules with its binding site partially occupied by Lp(a) molecule(s) to a) use the remaining binding site(s) to recognize other macromolecules or cells and b) transport Lp(a) across Fc receptor-bearing cells.

apoB-independent enzyme immunoassay for lipoprotein(a) by capture on immobilized lectin (jacalin)

Enzyme immunoassay for lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] using antibodies to both apoB and apo(a) subunits (a-B assay) is shown to be affected by differential masking of apoB by apo(a) and the presence of LDL-Lp(a) adducts. An apoB-independent immunoassay by capturing Lp(a) through its O-glycans on microplate-coated lectin jacalin and quantitation using peroxidase-labeled anti-apo(a) (J-a assay) is described. J-a assay response is linear, more than twice as sensitive as a-B assay, and is suppressed only 18 ± 5% by non-Lp(a) O-glycan-containing proteins of serum. Wide variations in IgA did not significantly affect Lp(a) binding to jacalin (CV = 6.4%).

Oxidation-specific biomarkers and risk of peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine the prospective association between oxidation-specific biomarkers, primarily oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) on apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins (OxPL/apoB) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). We examined, as secondary analyses, indirect measures of oxidized lipoproteins, including autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) and apolipoprotein B-100 immune complexes (ApoB-IC).

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers to predict the development of PAD are lacking. OxPL circulate in plasma, are transported by Lp(a), and deposit in the vascular wall and induce local inflammation.

METHODS

The study population included 2 parallel nested case-control studies of 143 men within the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1994 to 2008) and 144 women within the Nurses' Health Study (1990 to 2010) with incident confirmed cases of clinically significant PAD, matched 1:3 to control subjects.

RESULTS

Levels of OxPL/apoB were positively associated with risk of PAD in men and women: pooled relative risk: 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.19 to 1.58 for each 1-SD increase after adjusting age, smoking, fasting status, month of blood draw, lipids, body mass index, and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. Lp(a) was similarly associated with risk of PAD (pooled adjusted relative risk: 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.57 for each 1-SD increase). Autoantibodies to MDA-LDL and ApoB-IC were not consistently associated with risk of PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

OxPL/apoB were positively associated with risk of PAD in men and women. The major lipoprotein carrier of OxPL, Lp(a), was also associated with risk of PAD, reinforcing the key role of OxPL in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis mediated by Lp(a).

Inverse association between serum lipoprotein(a) and cerebral hemorrhage in the Japanese population

INTRODUCTION

Although lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is involved in cardiometabolic disease processes, the association between serum Lp(a) and stroke and/or its subtypes has not yet been elucidated among Japanese people. This study investigated the association between Lp(a) and the incidence of stroke and/or its subtypes in the general Japanese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This population-based prospective cohort study included 10,494 community-dwelling participants (4,030 males/6,464 females). The incidence of stroke and its subtypes was the primary outcome. The subjects were divided into tertiles based on their Lp(a) levels, and the risk of all stroke and stroke subtypes was examined using Cox's proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 393 subjects (199 males and 194 females) with stroke were identified during a follow-up duration of 10.7years. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for all stroke events were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.69 (0.49-0.99) in the 2nd (9-19mg/dl) and 3rd tertiles (≥20mg/dl) of Lp(a) in reference to the 1st tertile (<9mg/dl) in males, and 0.85 (0.59-1.24) and 0.76 (0.52-1.11) in 2nd (10-22mg/dl) and 3rd tertiles (≥23mg/dl) of Lp(a) in reference to the 1st tertile (<10mg/dl) in females. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for cerebral hemorrhage were 0.26 (0.10-0.67) and 0.34 (0.15-0.76) in the 2nd and 3rd tertiles of Lp(a) in reference to the 1st tertile in males, and were 0.48 (0.23-1.04) and 0.44 (0.21-0.96) in the 2nd and 3rd tertiles of Lp(a) in females.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) was associated with the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage in the general Japanese population, particularly among males, while a similar trend was seen among females. A low Lp(a) level may be a marker of the risk of cerebral hemorrhage in this population.

Lipoprotein(a), interleukin-10, C-reactive protein, and 8-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

This prospective study investigated the association between preprocedural biomarker levels and incident major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in complex patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stenting.

HYPOTHESIS

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) have long-term prognostic value in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and February 2003, 161 patients were included in the study. Blood was drawn before the procedure, and biomarkers were measured. Patients were followed-up for MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization). Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk of MACE for tertiles of biomarkers. Both 1-year and long-term follow-up (median, 6 years; maximum, 8 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59 years, and 68% were men. During long-term follow-up, 72 MACE occurred (overall crude cumulative incidence: 45% [95% confidence interval (CI): 37%-52%]). Lp(a) was associated with a higher 1-year risk of MACE, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.1 (95% CI: 1.1-8.6) for the highest vs the lowest tertile. This association weakened and lost significance with long-term follow-up. IL-10 showed a tendency toward an association with MACE. The 1-year HR was 2.1 (95% CI: 0.92-5.0). Long-term follow-up rendered a similar result. The association of CRP with MACE did not reach statistical significance at 1-year follow-up. However, CRP was associated with long-term risk of MACE, with an HR of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.0-3.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, preprocedural Lp(a) level was associated with short-term prognosis after PCI. The preprocedural CRP level was associated with long-term prognosis after PCI.

Lipoprotein(a) and family history of cardiovascular disease in children with familial dyslipidemias

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in children and adolescents with familial dyslipidemias the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level and family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and whether this association is independent of the disturbed lipid profile.

STUDY DESIGN

Lp(a) level, lipid profile, and a 2-generation genealogic tree to detect cardiovascular events were evaluated in 231 patients with familial dyslipidemias. Lp(a) levels were stratified according to presence, age of occurrence, and number and type of cardiovascular events in the patient's kindreds.

RESULTS

Lp(a) and other plasma lipid fractions did not differ between patients with and those without a family history of cardiovascular events. However, the percentage of patients with elevated Lp(a) level (≥85th percentile) was higher in those with a positive family history for early cardiovascular events (P = .01). Lp(a) level was a significant independent predictor of the number of premature cardiovascular events (β = 0.17; P = .01) and of cerebrovascular events in kindreds (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.05-6.03; P = .039), independent of plasma lipid fractions and other cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In children and adolescents with familial dyslipidemias, the overall association between Lp(a) level and family history of early CVD may be due to a threshold effect in those with the highest Lp(a) levels. However, multiple cardiovascular events and cerebrovascular events are predicted by any increase in plasma Lp(a) level, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors.

Interaction of the inflammasome genes CARD8 and NLRP3 in abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Cholesterol crystals have been shown to cause inflammation, and ultimately atherosclerotic lesions through the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. As cholesterol crystals have also been found in the walls of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), it is possible that the NLRP3 inflammasome is involved in AAA and genetic variability within this protein complex could alter disease risk. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether there is genetic evidence for a role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in AAA by testing for association of AAA with functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CARD8 and NLRP3 genes.

METHODS

AAA patients (n=1151) and controls (n=727) were genotyped for CARD8 SNP rs2043211 and NLRP3 SNP rs35829419 using TaqMan SNP assays. IL1-β, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] were measured in the plasma of a subset of study participants. The Kruskal-Wallis Rank test was conducted to test for differences in mean concentration of IL1-β, CRP and Lp(a). Logistic regression was used to test for interaction between CARD8 and NLRP3.

RESULTS

Significantly higher mean concentration of plasma IL1-β was observed in study participants who were homozygous for the common C allele of NLRP3 rs35829419 (p=0.010). Interaction between rs2043211 and rs35829419 was observed in this dataset (χ(2)=6.22; p=0.044), which strengthened when adjusted for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (χ(2)=14.75; p=0.012); and separately for NOD2 genotype (χ(2)=14.06; p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggests genetic variability within the NLRP3 inflammasome may be important in the pathophysiology of AAA.

Lipoprotein a: where are we now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the literature describing the link between lipoprotein a and vascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence that elevated plasma lipoprotein a levels are associated with coronary heart disease, stroke and other manifestations of atherosclerosis. Several mechanisms may be implicated, including proinflammatory actions and impaired fibrinolysis.

SUMMARY

Lipoprotein a potentially represents a useful tool for risk stratification in the primary and secondary prevention setting. However, there are still unresolved methodological issues regarding the measurement of lipoprotein a levels. Targeting lipoprotein a in order to reduce vascular risk is hampered by the lack of well tolerated and effective pharmacological interventions. Moreover, it has not yet been established whether such a reduction will result in fewer vascular events. The risk attributed to lipoprotein a may be reduced by aggressively tackling other vascular risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic heart disease--a causal association? A review

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Evidence for causality includes reproducible associations of a proposed risk factor with risk of disease in epidemiological studies, evidence from in vitro and animal studies in support of pathophysiological effects of the risk factor, and preferably evidence from randomized clinical trials documenting reduced morbidity in response to interventions targeting the risk factor. Elevated and in particular extreme lipoprotein(a) levels have in prospective studies repeatedly been associated with increased risk of IHD, although results from early studies are inconsistent. Data from in vitro and animal studies implicate lipoprotein(a), consisting of a low density lipoprotein particle covalently bound to the plasminogen-like glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), in both atherosclerosis and thrombosis, including accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic plaques and attenuation of t-PA mediated plasminogen activation. No randomized clinical trial of the effect of lowering lipoprotein(a) levels on IHD prevention has ever been conducted. Lacking evidence from randomized clinical trials, genetic studies, such as Mendelian randomization studies, can also support claims of causality. Levels of lipoprotein(a) are primarily determined by variation in the LPA gene coding for the apolipoprotein(a) moiety of lipoprotein(a), and genetic epidemiologic studies have documented association of LPA copy number variants, influencing levels of lipoprotein(a), with risk of IHD. In conclusion, results from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and genetic epidemiologic studies support a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of IHD, while results from randomized clinical trials are presently lacking.

An elevated level of physical activity is associated with normal lipoprotein(a) levels in individuals from Maracaibo, Venezuela

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death worldwide. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in which concentrations are genetically regulated. Contradictory results have been published about physical activity influence on Lp(a) concentration. This research aimed to determine associations between different physical activity levels and Lp(a) concentration. A descriptive and cross-sectional study was made in 1340 randomly selected subjects (males = 598; females = 712) to whom a complete clinical history, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and Lp(a) level determination were made. Statistical analysis was carried out to assess qualitative variables relationship by chi2 and differences between means by one-way analysis of variance considering a P value <0.05 as statistically significant. Results are shown as absolute frequencies, percentages, and mean +/- standard deviation according to case. Physical activity levels were ordinal classified as follows: low activity with 24.3% (n = 318), moderate activity with 35.0% (n = 458), and high physical activity with 40.8% (n = 534). Lp(a) concentration in the studied sample was 26.28 +/- 12.64 (IC: 25.59-26.96) mg/dL. Lp(a) concentration according to low, moderate, and high physical activity levels were 29.22 +/- 13.74, 26.27 +/- 12.91, and 24.53 +/- 11.35 mg/dL, respectively, observing statistically significant differences between low and moderate level (P = 0.004) and low and high level (P < 0.001). A strong association (chi2 = 9.771; P = 0.002) was observed among a high physical activity level and a normal concentration of Lp(a) (less than 30 mg/dL). A lifestyle characterized by high physical activity is associated with normal Lp(a) levels.

Lipoprotein(a) and other serum lipid subfractions influencing primary patency after infrainguinal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of serum lipid subfraction concentrations on arterial patency after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with infrainguinal peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD).

METHODS

From January 2007 to June 2008, a prospective study was conducted involving 39 patients (29 men; mean age 68.6+/-10.0 years) with infrainguinal PAOD in 41 limbs who had preprocedural lipid assessment and underwent successful PTA (<30% residual stenosis). Patient demographics, Fontaine clinical stage classification, Texas University Classification of ulcers, coexisting medical conditions, endovascular procedures, and lipid profiles were collected in a database. Follow-up included clinical and duplex ultrasound evaluation at discharge and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. To analyze any correlation between various lipid subfractions and the loss of primary patency (Cox proportional hazards modeling), the patients were dichotomized into high and low groups according to these thresholds: LDL-C >100 mg/dL, HDL-C <40 mg/dL, Lp(a) >30 mg/dL, and an Apo(B)/Apo(A) ratio >0.8 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 7.5 months (range 3-12). After 1, 3, and 6 months, the primary patency rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 94.9%, 73.7%, and 64.1%, respectively. Restenosis at 6 months was significantly related to female gender (HR 95.9, 95% CI 6.8 to 1352.5, p = 0.001), HDL-C <40 mg/dL (HR 86.9, 95% CI 6.4 to 1183.1, p = 0.001), LDL-C >100 mg/dL (HR 9.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 57.4, p = 0.013), and Lp(a) >30 mg/dL (HR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 26.3, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that Lp(a), LDL-C, and HDL-C are independent risk factors for restenosis after infrainguinal PTA.

Analysis of cholesterol levels in lipoprotein(a) with anion-exchange chromatography

We previously established an analysis method for determining the cholesterol levels of five major lipoprotein classes [HDL, LDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), VLDL, and chylomicrons] in serum by an anion-exchange (AEX)-HPLC method, but lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a well-known risk factor for atherosclerotic diseases, was not determinable. Therefore, we established new AEX-HPLC separation conditions for analyzing the cholesterol levels of six lipoprotein classes, including Lp(a). Serum lipoproteins were separated by HPLC with a diethylaminoethyl-ligand nonporous polymer-based column by elution with a stepwise gradient of the sodium perchlorate concentration. In this improved method, HDL, LDL, IDL, VLDL, chylomicrons, and Lp(a) were each eluted from the column. The cholesterol levels of the eluted lipoproteins were measured enzymatically by a postcolumn reaction. The within-day assay and between-day assay coefficients of variation for the lipoprotein cholesterol levels were in the ranges of 0.29-11.86% and 0.57-11.99%, respectively. The Lp(a) cholesterol levels determined by AEX-HPLC were significantly correlated with the amounts of Lp(a) protein measured by an immunoturbidimetry method available commercially (r = 0.9503, P < 0.0001). Taken together, this AEX-HPLC method may be effectively applied to the analysis of serum lipoproteins with high levels of Lp(a).

Relationship of heavy drinking, lipoprotein (a) and lipid profile to infrarenal aortic diameter

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the association of alcohol drinking and lipid profile with infrarenal aortic dimension. The diameter of the infrarenal aorta was measured using ultrasound in 395 individuals (mean 66.6 ± 10.3 years) with atherosclerotic diseases or risk factors. The associations between heavy drinking, serum lipoprotein (a) levels, lipid profile and infrarenal aorta diameters were examined. Heavy drinking and lipoprotein (a) were positively related with infrarenal aortic dimension, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C were negatively associated with infrarenal aortic diameter ( p < 0.05). In addition, there were negative associations of LDL-C/HDL-C, TC/HDL-C and positive associations of HDL-C and apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) with heavy drinking ( p < 0.05). In conclusion, there was a positive association between infrarenal aortic diameters and heavy drinking, as well as lipoprotein (a) levels. Furthermore, the novel and unexpected inverse association between LDL-C/HDL-C, LDL-C, TC/HDL-C and abdominal aortic diameter may suggest a possible role for anti-atherogenic lipid profile (characterized by a higher level of HDL-C and lower level of LDL-C) in aortic dilatation processes, which need to be clarified by further studies.

Lipoprotein(a) level and its association with tumor stage in male patients with primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, attention has been focused on the effect of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on tumors because of its possible role in development of tumor angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate Lp(a) serum levels in patients with lung cancer and its association with the stages of disease.

METHODS

Fasting venous blood samples were collected from 418 untreated male patients with stages I-IV lung carcinoma and were analyzed for Lp(a). The results were compared with the data from 65 healthy male controls.

RESULTS

Lp(a) levels were elevated (median 157 mg/L, range 16-1497 mg/L) in patients with lung carcinoma compared to control subjects (median 110 mg/L, range 35-706 mg/L) (p=0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with stages II-IV disease had significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations than did healthy controls (p-0.05). There was an independently positive correlation between tumor stage and Lp(a) levels among patients with stages I-III (r=0.162, p=0.006). However, there was a decrease in Lp(a) in stage IV compared to stage III patients (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant association between Lp(a) and the presence and stage of lung cancer. Additional investigations with a larger number of lung cancer patients are needed to confirm these findings.

Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECT

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) pathogenesis remains poorly understood. This study investigated the gene expression profile of peripheral blood from patients with AAA using microarray technology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined gene expression profiles in pooled RNA from 10 AAA patients and 10 matched controls with arrays representing 14,000 transcripts. Microarray data for selected genes were confirmed by real-time PCR in two different AAA (n=36) and control (n=36) populations and integrated with biochemical data. We identified 91 genes which were differentially expressed in AAA patients. Gene Ontology analysis indicated a significant alteration of oxygen transport (increased hemoglobin gene expression) and lipid metabolism [including monoglyceride lipase and low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene]. LRP5 expression was associated inversely with serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased expression of hemoglobin chain genes as well as of genes involved in erythrocyte mechanical stability were observed in the AAA RNA pools. The association between low levels of LRP5 gene expression and increased levels of Lp(a) in AAA patients suggests a potential role of LRP5 in Lp(a) catabolism. Our data underline the power of microarrays in identifying further molecular perturbations associated with AAA.

Increased levels of lipoprotein(a) in non-smoking aortic dissection patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum levels in patients with aortic dissection and the influence of smoking on the level of Lp(a) in aortic dissection patients.

METHODS

An age-and sex-matched case-control study was conducted. Lp(a) levels in patients with aortic dissection (n = 52) and healthy subjects (n = 104) were studied. The strength of associations between Lp(a) serum levels and aortic dissection was assessed by means of multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with aortic dissection had significantly higher Lp(a) serum levels (median, 17.6 mg/dl; range, 6.4-88.7 mg/dl) compared to healthy individuals (median, 12.4 mg/dl; range, 4.9-26.4 mg/dl) (p = 0.005). The Lp(a) concentration in non-smoking patients with aortic dissection (median, 19.1 mg/dl, range, 10.5-88.7 mg/dl) significantly surpassed that of the smoking patients with aortic dissection of comparable age (median, 10.7 mg/dl; range, 6.4-22.1 mg/dl) (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association between Lp(a) and aortic dissection in the non-smoking population (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum Lp(a) level is significantly elevated in non-smoking patients with aortic dissection independently of other cardiovascular risk factors. Therefore, determination of Lp(a) levels may be important in identifying subjects at risk of aortic dissection among nonsmokers.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166C polymorphism is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm in three independent cohorts

OBJECTIVE

Although polymorphic variations in genes of the RAS system have previously been associated with susceptibility to AAA, such studies have been significantly limited by small sample sizes. This study was undertaken, using the largest case series yet reported, to determine whether common genetic variants of the RAS are associated with either susceptibility or severity of AAA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The frequencies of 4 common genetic variants of genes related to the renin-angiotensin system were investigated in 3 geographically distinct, but ethnically similar, case-control cohorts, resulting in comparison of 1226 AAA cases with 1723 controls. In all 3 the AGTR1 1166C allele was significantly more common in AAA patients than controls (overall adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.93, P=1.1x10(-6)). Overall, the ACE ID genotype was associated with AAA (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.67, P<0.02). The AGT 268T allele appeared to have an epistatic effect on large aneurysm size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified a strong and repeated association between the AGTR1 1166C allele and susceptibility to AAA, and a weaker effect associated with the ACE deletion allele, in 3 geographically distinct, but ethnically similar, case-control cohorts. This study highlights the key role of the RAS in AAA and emphasizes the need for replication and validation of results in suitable independent cohorts.

Novel rare mutations and promoter haplotypes in ABCA1 contribute to low-HDL-C levels

The ATP-binding cassette A1 (ABCA1) protein regulates plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Mutations in ABCA1 can cause HDL deficiency and increase the risk of premature coronary artery disease. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ABCA1 are associated with variation in plasma HDL levels. We investigated the prevalence of mutations and common SNPs in ABCA1 in 154 low-HDL individuals and 102 high-HDL individuals. Mutations were identified in five of the low-HDL subjects, three having novel variants (I659V, R2004K, and A2028V) and two with a previously identified variant (R1068H). Analysis of four SNPs in the ABCA1 gene promoter (C-564T, G-407C, G-278C, and C-14T) identified the C-14T SNP and the TCCT haplotype to be over-represented in low-HDL individuals. The R1587K SNP was over-represented in low-HDL individuals, and the V825I and I883M SNPs over-represented in high-HDL individuals. We conclude that sequence variation in ABCA1 contributes significantly to variation in HDL levels.

The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm

Recently, two common sequence variants on 9p21, tagged by rs10757278-G and rs10811661-T, were reported to be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), respectively. We proceeded to further investigate the contributions of these variants to arterial diseases and T2D. Here we report that rs10757278-G is associated with, in addition to CAD, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; odds ratio (OR) = 1.31, P = 1.2 x 10(-12)) and intracranial aneurysm (OR = 1.29, P = 2.5 x 10(-6)), but not with T2D. This variant is the first to be described that affects the risk of AAA and intracranial aneurysm in many populations. The association of rs10811661-T to T2D replicates in our samples, but the variant does not associate with any of the five arterial diseases examined. These findings extend our insight into the role of the sequence variant tagged by rs10757278-G and show that it is not confined to atherosclerotic diseases.