Optimal Detection of Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities by Massively Parallel DNA Sequencing of Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Blood

Cell-free DNA test for fetal chromosomal abnormalities in multiple pregnancies

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to report the screening performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing for chromosomal abnormalities in twins, triplets, and vanishing twin pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were obtained from pregnant women with a multiple pregnancy or a vanishing twin pregnancy at ≥10 weeks' gestation who requested self-financed cfDNA testing between May 2015 and December 2021. Those that had positive screening results had diagnostic confirmatory procedures after counseling and consent. The performance of screening of the cfDNA test was determined by calculating confirmation rate and combined false-positive rate (cFPR).

RESULTS

Data from 292 women were included after exclusion of those lost to follow-up, with no-result on cfDNA testing, or had reductions. Of the 292 pregnancies, 10 (3.4%) were triplets, including no cases of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18; 249 (85.3%) were twins, including 3 cases of trisomy 21 and no cases of trisomy 18 and 13; and 33 (11.3%) were vanishing twins, including 3 cases of trisomy 21 and 1 case of trisomy 18. The median (IQR) maternal age was 34 years (31-37). For triplet pregnancies, the initial no-result rate was 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-26.4), all with results after redraw. For twin pregnancies, the initial no-result rate was 12.9% (95% CI 9.6-17.0), and the no-result rate after redraw was 1.6% (95% CI 0.7-3.6). For vanishing twins, there were no cases with no-result. All triplets had low-risk cfDNA results. The confirmation rate for trisomy 21 was 100% with a FPR at 0% due to the small number of positive cases for twins. For vanishing twins, one high-risk case for trisomy 21 and the only high-risk case for trisomy 18 were confirmed with a cFPR of 8.3% (n = 2/24; 95% CI 2.3-25.9).

CONCLUSIONS

cfDNA testing in twin pregnancies has sufficient screening performance for trisomy 21 but the number of affected cases for other conditions is limited to draw any meaningful conclusion. The use of cfDNA testing in triplet pregnancies and vanishing twins remains an area for further research.

Artificial intelligence for prenatal chromosome analysis

This review article delves into the rapidly advancing domain of prenatal diagnostics, with a primary focus on the detection and management of chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 13 ("Patau syndrome)", "trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome)", and "trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)". The objective of the study is to examine the utilization and effectiveness of novel computational methodologies, such as "machine learning (ML)", "deep learning (DL)", and data analysis, in enhancing the detection rates and accuracy of these prenatal conditions. The contribution of the article lies in its comprehensive examination of advancements in "Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)", prenatal screening, genomics, and medical imaging. It highlights the potential of these techniques for prenatal diagnosis and the contributions of ML and DL to these advancements. It highlights the application of ensemble models and transfer learning to improving model performance, especially with limited datasets. This also delves into optimal feature selection and fusion of high-dimensional features, underscoring the need for future research in these areas. The review finds that ML and DL have substantially improved the detection and management of prenatal conditions, despite limitations such as small sample sizes and issues related to model generalizability. It recognizes the promising results achieved through the use of ensemble models and transfer learning in prenatal diagnostics. The review also notes the increased importance of feature selection and high-dimensional feature fusion in the development and training of predictive models. The findings underline the crucial role of AI and machine learning techniques in early detection and improved therapeutic strategies in prenatal diagnostics, highlighting a pressing need for further research in this area.

Performance of noninvasive prenatal testing for twin pregnancies in South China

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs) in twin pregnancies.

METHOD

A cohort of 2010 women with twin pregnancies was recruited. 1331 patients opted for NIPT, and 679 patients opted for expanded NIPT (NIPT-plus). All high-risk patients were advised to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis. All participants were followed up until 6 months after birth.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases were predicted to have a high risk of chromosome abnormalities by NIPT, of which 14 pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis. The 14 cases included 3 cases of trisomy 21, 1 case of trisomy 18, 1 case of trisomy 7, 2 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and 7 cases of CNVs, of which the confirmed cases numbered 2, 1, 0, 1, and 0, respectively. Twenty cases were predicted to have a high risk of chromosome abnormalities by NIPT-plus, of which 16 pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis. The 16 cases included 1 case of trisomy 21, 1 case of trisomy 7, 7 cases of SCAs, and 7 cases of CNVs, of which were confirmed in 1, 0, 3, and 2, respectively. No false-negative result was reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The NIPT/NIPT-plus has excellent performance in the detection of chromosome aneuploidies in twin pregnancies. But for CNVs, the effectiveness of NIPT is poor, and the NIPT-plus have a certain detection efficiency. It is worth noting that pre- and post-genetic counseling is especially important, and the chorionicity, mode of conception, clinical indications, and fetal fraction should be considered as influencing factors.

A Rapid, Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing Workflow Applicable to Limiting Amounts of Cell-Free DNA

BACKGROUND

Somatic copy number alterations (sCNAs) acquired during the evolution of breast cancer provide valuable prognostic and therapeutic information. Here we present a workflow for screening sCNAs using picogram amounts of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and single circulating tumor cells (CTCs).

METHODS

We repurposed the Ion ReproSeq PGS™ preimplantation genetic testing kit to perform shallow whole genome sequencing on 178 cfDNA samples (300 pg) and individual CTCs from 10 MBC patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) recovered by CellSearch®/DEPArray™. Results were analyzed using a tailored ichorCNA workflow.

RESULTS

sCNAs were detected in cfDNA of 41/105 (39%) patients with MBC and 3/23 (13%) primary breast cancers on follow-up (PBC FU), all of whom subsequently relapsed. In 8 of 10 MBCs, individual CTCs had a higher copy number count than matched cfDNA. The median tumor fraction detected by ichorCNA was 0.34 (range 0.17-0.58) for MBC and 0.36 (range 0.31-0.37) for PBC FU. Patients with detectable tumor fraction (≥ 0.1) and TFx and OncomineTM variants had significantly lower overall survival rates (P values P = 0.002 and P < 0.0001 for the log-rank test, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The ReproSeq PGS assay is rapid, at approximately $120 per sample, providing both a sCNA profile and estimation of the tumor DNA fraction from limiting cfDNA template (300pg) and individual CTCs. The approach could be used to examine the copy number landscape over time to guide treatment decisions, support future trial designs, and be applied to low volume blood spot samples enabling remote monitoring.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cell-free DNA testing for detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the accuracy of cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA) for detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess cfDNA accuracy for prenatal detection of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX and 47,XYY. Inclusion was restricted to studies published between January 2010 and December 2021 reporting both cfDNA and confirmatory diagnostic test results.

RESULTS

For 45,X, the sensitivity was 98.8% (95%CI 94.6%-100%), specificity 99.4% (95%CI 98.7%-99.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) 14.5% (95%CI 7.0%-43.8%). For 47,XXY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 99.6%-100%), specificity 100% (95%CI 99.9%-100%) and PPV 97.7% (95%CI 78.6%-100%). For 47,XXX, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 96.9%-100%), specificity 99.9% (95%CI 99.7%-100%) and PPV 61.6% (95%CI 37.6%-95.4%). For 47,XYY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 91.3%-100%), specificity 100% (95% CI 100%-100%) and PPV 100% (95%CI 76.5%-100%). All four SCAs had estimated negative predictive values (NPV) exceeding 99.99%, though false negatives were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that cfDNA is a reliable screening test for SCA, though both false negatives and false positives were reported. These estimates of test performance are derived from pregnancies at high pretest risk for aneuploidy, limiting the generalisability to average risk pregnancies.

Combined Model-Based Prediction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening

The risk of chromosomal abnormalities in the child increases with increasing maternal age. Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a safe and effective prenatal screening method, the accuracy of the test results needs to be improved owing to various testing conditions. We attempted to achieve a more accurate and robust prediction of chromosomal abnormalities by combining multiple methods. Here, three different methods, namely standard Z-score, normalized chromosome value, and within-sample reference bin, were used for 1698 reference and 109 test samples of whole-genome sequencing. The logistic regression model combining the three methods achieved a higher accuracy than any single method. In conclusion, the proposed method offers a promising approach for increasing the reliability of NIPT.

Development and performance evaluation of an artificial intelligence algorithm using cell-free DNA fragment distance for non-invasive prenatal testing (aiD-NIPT)

With advances in next-generation sequencing technology, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely implemented to detect fetal aneuploidies, including trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, and T13). Most NIPT methods use cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragment count (FC) in maternal blood. In this study, we developed a novel NIPT method using cfDNA fragment distance (FD) and convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence algorithm (aiD-NIPT). Four types of aiD-NIPT algorithm (mean, median, interquartile range, and its ensemble) were developed using 2,215 samples. In an analysis of 17,678 clinical samples, all algorithms showed &gt;99.40% accuracy for T21/T18/T13, and the ensemble algorithm showed the best performance (sensitivity: 99.07%, positive predictive value (PPV): 88.43%); the FC-based conventional Z-score and normalized chromosomal value showed 98.15% sensitivity, with 40.77% and 36.81% PPV, respectively. In conclusion, FD-based aiD-NIPT was successfully developed, and it showed better performance than FC-based NIPT methods.

A Critical Evaluation of Validation and Clinical Experience Studies in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Monosomy X

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X is widely utilized with massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS), digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses being the most widely reported methods. We searched the literature to find all NIPT clinical validation and clinical experience studies between January 2011 and January 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects and univariate regression models for estimating summary performance measures across studies. Bivariate meta-regression was performed to explore the influence of testing method and study design. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses evaluated factors that may have led to heterogeneity. Based on 55 validation studies, the detection rate (DR) was significantly higher for retrospective studies, while the false positive rate (FPR) was significantly lower for prospective studies. Comparing the performance of NIPT methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 combined, the SNP method had a higher DR and lower FPR than other methods, significantly so for MPSS, though not for DANSR. The performance of the different methods in the 84 clinical experience studies was consistent with validation studies. Clinical positive predictive values of all NIPT methods improved over the last decade. We conclude that all NIPT methods are highly effective for fetal aneuploidy screening, with performance differences across methodologies.

The performance of grey zone in common foetal aneuploidy screening by semiconductor sequencing

A total of 15,267 pregnancies were tested by NIPT in this study. Grey zone (z score: 2.58 ∼ 4 and -4∼-2.58) was set for screening out aneuploidy 21, 18 and 13. Cases with z score located in the grey zone were retested starting from DNA extraction. The chi-squared test and/or the Fisher's exact test were used to compare variables. One hundred and eight screening-positive samples in the first run of NIPT were common trisomies 21 (N = 83), trisomies18 (N = 13) or trisomies 13 (N = 12), with PPVs of 87.18%, 76.92%, and 30% respectively. For the cases in the grey zone, most of them (67.15%, 184/274) were reported with Z score of Chromosome 21 in the grey zone and 176 were reclassified as negative by the second run of NIPT; while 3 cases reclassified as trisomy 21 and 1 case reclassified as trisomy 13 were finally confirmed by karyotyping analysis, with PPV 25% and 20% respectively. The grey zone and the second run of NIPT in this study showed that the grey zone and second run NIPT approach was able to accurately help categorise cases as negative and positive. Invasive diagnosis is recommended to prevent false negative aneuploidies for samples located in the special z score scope of 2.58-3 for two runs of NIPT. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Grey zone was widely used in NIPT. The performance of grey zone of clinical samples on Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument has been reported, and the performance of grey zone on some mainstream sequencers with simulated samples has also been summarised. Reported treatments for samples located in the grey zone in NIPT usually included being classified into 'unclassified' or 'no call' followed by following up and/or karyotyping analysis.What do the results of this study add? This study investigated the performance of the grey zone on Ion Proton DA8600 with clinical samples; and it present an alternative treatment for samples in grey zone that reclassified them as negative or positive by the second run of sequencing.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our own data for the performance of the grey zone in the cfDNA assay on the semiconductor sequencing platform might provide raw materials for other researchers' meta-analysis, cohort study, or other studies. Details of Z score distributions of chromosomes in grey zone, results of the second run of NIPT for samples in the grey zone, and false negative samples in the grey zone would help lab technicians better analyse the NIPT results and help doctors to improve genetic counselling.

A microfluidic platform for high-purity cell free DNA extraction from plasma for non-invasive prenatal testing

OBJECTIVES

Increase the yield and purity of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from plasma for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as inefficiencies in this extraction and purification can dramatically affect the sensitivity and specificity of the test.

METHODS

This work integrates cfDNA extraction from plasma with a microfluidic chip platform by combining magnetic bead-based extraction and electroosmotic flow on the microfluidic chip. Various wash buffers and voltage conditions were simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics Modeling and tested experimentally.

RESULTS

When performing the first wash step of this assay on the microfluidic chip with 300 V applied across the channel there was a six-fold increase in the A₂₆₀ /A₂₃₀ ratio showing a significant improvement (p value 0.0005) in the purity of the extracted sample all while maintaining a yield of 68.19%. These values are critical as a high yield results in more sample to analyze and an increase in A₂₆₀ /A₂₃₀ ratio corresponds to a decrease in salt contaminants such as guanidinium thiocyanate which can interfere with downstream processes during DNA library preparation and potentially hinder the NIPT screening results.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique has the potential to improve NIPT outcomes and other clinically relevant workflows that use cfDNA as an analyte such as cancer detection.

WisecondorFF: Improved Fetal Aneuploidy Detection from Shallow WGS through Fragment Length Analysis

In prenatal diagnostics, NIPT screening utilizing read coverage-based profiles obtained from shallow WGS data is routinely used to detect fetal CNVs. From this same data, fragment size distributions of fetal and maternal DNA fragments can be derived, which are known to be different, and often used to infer fetal fractions. We argue that the fragment size has the potential to aid in the detection of CNVs. By integrating, in parallel, fragment size and read coverage in a within-sample normalization approach, it is possible to construct a reference set encompassing both data types. This reference then allows the detection of CNVs within queried samples, utilizing both data sources. We present a new methodology, WisecondorFF, which improves sensitivity, while maintaining specificity, relative to existing approaches. WisecondorFF increases robustness of detected CNVs, and can reliably detect even at lower fetal fractions (<2%).

Systematic evaluation of NIPT aneuploidy detection software tools with clinically validated NIPT samples

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a powerful screening method for fetal aneuploidy detection, relying on laboratory and computational analysis of cell-free DNA. Although several published computational NIPT analysis tools are available, no prior comprehensive, head-to-head accuracy comparison of the various tools has been published. Here, we compared the outcome accuracies obtained for clinically validated samples with five commonly used computational NIPT aneuploidy analysis tools (WisecondorX, NIPTeR, NIPTmer, RAPIDR, and GIPseq) across various sequencing depths (coverage) and fetal DNA fractions. The sample set included cases of fetal trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome). We determined that all of the compared tools were considerably affected by lower sequencing depths, such that increasing proportions of undetected trisomy cases (false negatives) were observed as the sequencing depth decreased. We summarised our benchmarking results and highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of each computational NIPT software. To conclude, trisomy detection for lower coverage NIPT samples (e.g. 2.5M reads per sample) is technically possible but can, with some NIPT tools, produce troubling rates of inaccurate trisomy detection, especially in low-FF samples.

Non-invasive prenatal testing analysis relies on computational algorithms that are used for inferring chromosomal aneuploidies, such as chromosome 21 triploidy in the case of Down syndrome. However, the performance of these algorithms has not been compared on the same clinically validated data. Here we conducted a head-to-head comparison of WGS-based NIPT aneuploidy detection tools. Our findings indicate that at and below 2.5M reads per sample, the least accurate algorithm would miss detection of almost a third of trisomy cases. Furthermore, we describe and quantify a previously undocumented aneuploidy risk uncertainty that is mainly relevant in cases of very low sequencing coverage (at and below 1.25M reads per sample) and could, in the worst-case scenario, lead to a false negative rate of 245 undetected trisomies per 1,000 trisomy cases. Our findings underscore the importance of the informed selection of NIPT software tools in combination with sequencing coverage, which directly impacts NIPT sequencing cost and accuracy.

Assessment and Clinical Utility of a Non-Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Technology

Background: Rolling-circle replication (RCR) is a novel technology that has not been applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing until recently. Given the cost and simplicity advantages of this technology compared to other platforms currently used in cfDNA analysis, an assessment of RCR in clinical laboratories was performed. Here, we present the first validation study from clinical laboratories utilizing RCR technology. Methods: 831 samples from spontaneously pregnant women carrying a singleton fetus, and 25 synthetic samples, were analyzed for the fetal risk of trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13), by three laboratories on three continents. All the screen-positive pregnancies were provided post-test genetic counseling and confirmatory diagnostic invasive testing (e.g., amniocentesis). The screen-negative pregnancies were routinely evaluated at birth for fetal aneuploidies, using newborn examinations, and any suspected aneuploidies would have been offered diagnostic testing or confirmed with karyotyping. Results: The study found rolling-circle replication to be a highly viable technology for the clinical assessment of fetal aneuploidies, with 100% sensitivity for T21 (95% CI: 82.35-100.00%); 100.00% sensitivity for T18 (71.51-100.00%); and 100.00% sensitivity for T13 analyses (66.37-100.00%). The specificities were >99% for each trisomy (99.7% (99.01-99.97%) for T21; 99.5% (98.62-99.85%) for T18; 99.7% (99.03-99.97%) for T13), along with a first-pass no-call rate of 0.93%. Conclusions: The study showed that using a rolling-circle replication-based cfDNA system for the evaluation of the common aneuploidies would provide greater accuracy and clinical utility compared to conventional biochemical screening, and it would provide comparable results to other reported cfDNA methodologies.

Adaptive parameter of standard deviation enhances the power of noninvasive prenatal screens

PURPOSE

Traditional Z-test methods during noninvasive prenatal screens (NIPS) use the fixed parameter of standard deviation (SD), which ignores the influence of actual sequencing read counts of a sample on the results. The aim of this study is to eliminate the influence of the sequencing depth of individual samples on the results and enhance the power of NIPS.

METHODS

In this study, we propose an improved NIPS method, which calculates the SD in the Z-score process adaptively according to the actual read count of the test sample. Our approach obtained the SD linear fitting function along with the read count with a large number of reference samples, in which SD and read count fit well. The effectiveness of our enhanced NIPS method was evaluated on three common trisomy syndromes and five recurrent CNV syndromes with 3219 and 6592 samples based on whole genome sequencing of maternal peripheral blood.

RESULTS

A total of 3,219 pregnant samples have been used for validating the proposed method on detecting fetal trisomy syndromes (T13, T18, and T21), in which eight false negative (FN) samples have been corrected as true positive (TP) and eight false positive (FP) samples have been fixed as true negative (TN) with our proposed adaptive-SD method. Another 6592 samples were used to compare the two methods on detecting five recurrent fetal copy number variation (CNV) syndromes, in which the FP samples have decreased from 99 to 39.

CONCLUSIONS

Our adaptive-SD NIPS method shows more power on detecting both trisomy syndromes and five recurrent CNVs in the pregnant samples with diverse read counts. Besides, our proposed method contributes to lower FP and FN samples than the traditional Z-test method in NIPS. Our results show that our enhanced NIPS methods are effective in detecting both abnormal fetal trisomy syndromes and recurrent CNV syndromes in pregnant women.

Non-invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Background

There is little evidence on the performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal sex chromosomal imbalances. In this review, we aimed to appraise and synthesize the literature on the performance of NIPT for the prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Methods

We performed our literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CADTH. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. There were no restrictions on the study population. Meta‐analyses were performed with “R” software. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with their 95% CI were estimated using a random‐effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by a Q test.

Results

Based on 11 studies in high prior risk pregnancies, including 116 affected fetuses in aggregate, Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing (MPSS) had a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI 84.1%, 97.8%) and a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI 98.7%, 99.9%) for the detection of 45,X. Based on four studies in high‐risk pregnancies, with 83 affected fetuses in aggregate, Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing (TMPS) had a sensitivity of 83.2% (95% CI 49.6%, 96.2%) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 98.3%, 100%) for the detection of 45,X. In mixed‐risk pregnancies, the sensitivity of TMPS for the detection of 45,X was 90.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 70%, 97.7%) and specificity 99.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 99.4%, 100%); MPSS data were not available in such pregnancies. Based on smaller numbers of studies, and small numbers of affected fetuses in either high‐risk or mixed‐risk pregnancies (using either MPSS or TMPS), the sensitivities and specificities were equal to or greater than 76.2% for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47, XYY. The test failures for SCAs were 0.2% (95% CI 0%, 13.6%) for MPSS and 5.6% (95% CI 3.7%, 8.4%) for TMPS.

Conclusion

High‐quality studies are still desirable in order to estimate the performance of NIPT for the detection of sex chromosome imbalances.

Next Generation Sequencing Based Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): First Report From Saudi Arabia

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in pregnant women screening has been recently established in Saudi Arabia. We aim from this study to report our experience in the implementation of this new technology in clinical practice and to assess factors influencing cell-free fetal (cffDNA) fraction and successful NIPT reporting.

Methods: In total, 200 pregnant women were subjected to the NIPT test using standard methods. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to analyze cffDNA in maternal plasma.

Results: Out of the 200 NIPT cases, the average age of pregnant women was 35 ± 6 years (range: 21–48 years). The average cffDNA fraction of reported cases was 13.72% (range: 3–31%). Out of these 200 cases, 187 (93.5%) were at low risk, while 13 (6.5%) cases revealed high risk for aneuploidy. Among these chromosomal abnormalities, 7 (3.5%) cases of Down’s syndrome, 5 (2.5%) Edwards’ Syndrome, and only 1 case of (0.5%) Patau’s syndrome was observed. Out of the 13 high-risk cases, 2 (15.3%) were found in women below the age of 30.

Conclusion: This is the first study reporting the successful implementation of an in-house NIPT screening service in Saudi Arabia. Our data showed high accuracy and sensitivity to detect high-risk cases indicating the usefulness of such a technique as an alternative to invasive testing and (hopefully) will change the common screening practice for pregnant women in Saudi Arabia.

Industry, experts and the role of the 'invisible college' in the dissemination of non-invasive prenatal testing in the US

Enthusiasm for so-called 'personalized' or 'precision' medicine has encouraged the growth of the molecular diagnostics industry and the proliferation of high-priced proprietary tests that can predict, diagnose or inform the treatment of diverse clinical conditions. Through a case study of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), we explore how the mechanisms governing the development and dissemination of this novel prenatal screening test are most aptly understood as a 'regulatory regime.' We describe how private actors tied to the manufacturers of this test form a network of "experts" that contribute to the coordination of this regime by virtue of their efforts to navigate the governance of test adoption and also form spaces in which the standards governing test adoption are developed. We draw attention to private actors in this regime to demonstrate that they are a constitutive element of the public policy system governing biomedical innovation and adoption. Through this case study of NIPT we deepen our previous analysis of the role of consultants in navigating and shaping a regulatory regime (Holloway and Miller, 2020) and offer new insight about how scientists work with consultants to shape a regulatory regime that serves industry interests. Our work indicates that the private actors tied to the manufacturers of NIPT (experts employed by industry to court scientists and lobby payers, scientists collaborating with industry, key opinion leaders involved with clinical practice guidelines, lobbyists and consultants), constitute an 'invisible college' that navigates the governance of test adoption. The formations and negotiations over standards for NIPT identified in this paper comprise a new institutional norm: a polycentric regulatory regime permeated by commercial interests. The institutionalization of this regime has implications for accountability, transparency and test quality amidst a proliferation of new proprietary molecular tests.'

Analysis of cell-free DNA in a consecutive series of 13,607 routine cases for the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in a single center in Germany

Purpose

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a highly sensitive and specific method for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies from maternal plasma. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of a new paired-end sequencing-based NIPT assay in 13,607 pregnancies from a single center in Germany.

Methods

Samples from 13,607 pregnant women who previously underwent NIPT were analyzed using VeriSeq NIPT Solution v2 assay for presence of common fetal trisomies and monosomy X. Follow-up to determine clinical truth was carried out.

Results

Of the 13,607 cases, 13,509 received a NIPT call resulting in a low study failure rate of 0.72%. There were 188 (1.4%) high-risk calls: 117 trisomy 21, 34 trisomy 18, 23 trisomy 13, one trisomy 21 + 13, and 13 monosomy X. High sensitivities and specificities of ≥ 98.89% were reported for all four aneuploidy conditions. Of the high-risk cases, clinical follow-up data were available for 77.1% (145/188). Clinical follow-up of high-risk calls revealed an overall positive predictive value of 84.8% (potential range 65.4–88.3%). NIPT results were provided for samples across a range of fetal fractions, down to 2% fetal fraction.

Conclusion

The VeriSeq NIPT Solution v2 assay detected fetal chromosomal aneuploidies across a range of fetal fractions with high sensitivities and specificities observed based on known clinical outcomes, a high overall PPV, and a low failure rate.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05856-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Identification of fetal unmodified and 5-hydroxymethylated CG sites in maternal cell-free DNA for non-invasive prenatal testing

BACKGROUND

Massively parallel sequencing of maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is widely used to test fetal genetic abnormalities in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). However, sequencing-based approaches are still of high cost. Building upon previous knowledge that placenta, the main source of fetal circulating DNA, is hypomethylated in comparison to maternal tissue counterparts of cfDNA, we propose that targeting either unmodified or 5-hydroxymethylated CG sites specifically enriches fetal genetic material and reduces numbers of required analytical sequencing reads thereby decreasing cost of a test.

METHODS

We employed uTOPseq and hmTOP-seq approaches which combine covalent derivatization of unmodified or hydroxymethylated CG sites, respectively, with next generation sequencing, or quantitative real-time PCR.

RESULTS

We detected increased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) levels in fetal chorionic villi (CV) tissue samples as compared with peripheral blood. Using our previously developed uTOP-seq and hmTOP-seq approaches we obtained whole-genome uCG and 5hmCG maps of 10 CV tissue and 38 cfDNA samples in total. Our results indicated that, in contrast to conventional whole genome sequencing, such epigenomic analysis highly specifically enriches fetal DNA fragments from maternal cfDNA. While both our approaches yielded 100% accuracy in detecting Down syndrome in fetuses, hmTOP-seq maintained such accuracy at ultra-low sequencing depths using only one million reads. We identified 2164 and 1589 placenta-specific differentially modified and 5-hydroxymethylated regions, respectively, in chromosome 21, as well as 3490 and 2002 Down syndrome-specific differentially modified and 5-hydroxymethylated regions, respectively, that can be used as biomarkers for identification of Down syndrome or other epigenetic diseases of a fetus.

CONCLUSIONS

uTOP-seq and hmTOP-seq approaches provide a cost-efficient and sensitive epigenetic analysis of fetal abnormalities in maternal cfDNA. The results demonstrated that T21 fetuses contain a perturbed epigenome and also indicated that fetal cfDNA might originate from fetal tissues other than placental chorionic villi. Robust covalent derivatization followed by targeted analysis of fetal DNA by sequencing or qPCR presents an attractive strategy that could help achieve superior sensitivity and specificity in prenatal diagnostics.

Clinical experience across the fetal-fraction spectrum of a non-invasive prenatal screening approach with low test-failure rate

OBJECTIVE

To describe our clinical experience across the entire range of fetal-fraction (FF) measurements of a non-invasive prenatal screen (NIPS) that uses whole- genome sequencing (WGS).

METHODS

We analyzed retrospectively results from 58 105 singleton pregnancies that underwent NIPS on a customized WGS platform during an 8-month period and assessed clinical test performance for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. Pregnancy outcomes were sought for all screen-positive patients and for 18% of screen-negative patients. As differences in outcome-collection response rates could artificially impact test-performance calculations, we computed inferred sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values adjusted for ascertainment bias.

RESULTS

The screening test yielded a result for 99.9% (n = 58 048) of patients, meaning that approximately 1 in 1000 patients received a test failure (i.e. test failure rate = 0.1%). Of pregnancies with a test result, 572 (1%) screened positive for one of the common aneuploidies (362 for trisomy 21, 142 for trisomy 18 and 68 for trisomy 13). Informative outcomes were received for 237 (41.4%) patients with a screen-positive result and 3258 (5.7%) of those with a screen-negative result. In the full cohort, inferred sensitivities for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 were 99.7%, 96.8% and 94.3%, respectively, and PPVs were 93.1%, 85.2% and 48.4%, respectively. If a FF threshold of 4% had been employed to guard against false negatives, calculated sensitivities for the three aneuploidies would not have changed significantly, yet, importantly, the overall test-failure rate would have increased to 6.6% (n = 3829), impacting 1 in 15 women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical experience demonstrates that a customized WGS-based NIPS without a FF threshold achieves high accuracy while maintaining a low test-failure rate of 0.1%. As such, alternative strategies to ensure high accuracy of detection of common aneuploidies in samples with low FF (such as redraw after test failure, redrawing at a later gestational age, risk scoring based on FF) are not necessary for this screening approach. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Strategy for Use of Genome-Wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies and Unbalanced Structural Chromosomal Anomalies

Atypical fetal chromosomal anomalies are more frequent than previously recognized and can affect fetal development. We propose a screening strategy for a genome-wide non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) to detect these atypical chromosomal anomalies (ACAs). Two sample cohorts were tested. Assay performances were determined using Cohort A, which consisted of 192 biobanked plasma samples—42 with ACAs, and 150 without. The rate of additional invasive diagnostic procedures was determined using Cohort B, which consisted of 3097 pregnant women referred for routine NIPT. Of the 192 samples in Cohort A, there were four initial test failures and six discordant calls; overall sensitivity was 88.1% (37/42; CI 75.00–94.81) and specificity was 99.3% (145/146; CI 96.22–99.88). In Cohort B, there were 90 first-pass failures (2.9%). The rate of positive results indicating an anomaly was 1.2% (36/3007) and 0.57% (17/3007) when limited to significant unbalanced chromosomal anomalies and trisomies 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 22. These results show that genome-wide NIPT can screen for ACAs with an acceptable sensitivity and a small increase in invasive testing, particularly for women with increased risk following maternal serum screening and by limiting screening to structural anomalies and the most clinically meaningful trisomies.

Cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 7113 pregnancies: single Italian centre study

Introduction

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free foetal DNA has been widely accepted in recent years for detecting common foetal chromosome aneuploidies, such as trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and sex chromosome aneuploidies. In this study, the practical clinical performance of our foetal DNA testing was evaluated for analysing all chromosome aberrations among 7113 pregnancies in Italy.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of collected NIPT data from the Ion S5 next-generation sequencing platform obtained from Altamedica Medical Centre in Rome, Italy.

Results

In this study, NIPT showed 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomies 13, 18 and 21. Out of the 7113 samples analysed, 74 cases (1%) were positive by NIPT testing; foetal karyotyping and follow-up results validated 2 trisomy 13 cases, 5 trisomy 18 cases, 58 trisomy 21 cases and 10 sex chromosome aneuploidy cases. There were no false-negative results.

Conclusion

In our hands, NIPT had high sensitivity and specificity for common chromosomal aneuploidies such as trisomies 13, 18 and 21.

Combining count- and length-based z-scores leads to improved predictions in non-invasive prenatal testing

MOTIVATION

Non-invasive prenatal testing or NIPT is currently among the top researched topic in obstetric care. While the performance of the current state-of-the-art NIPT solutions achieve high sensitivity and specificity, they still struggle with a considerable number of samples that cannot be concluded with certainty. Such uninformative results are often subject to repeated blood sampling and re-analysis, usually after two weeks, and this period may cause a stress to the future mothers as well as increase the overall cost of the test.

RESULTS

We propose a supplementary method to traditional z-scores to reduce the number of such uninformative calls. The method is based on a novel analysis of the length profile of circulating cell free DNA which compares the change in such profiles when random-based and length-based elimination of some fragments is performed. The proposed method is not as accurate as the standard z-score; however, our results suggest that combination of these two independent methods correctly resolves a substantial portion of healthy samples with an uninformative result. Additionally, we discuss how the proposed method can be used to identify maternal aberrations, thus reducing the risk of false positive and false negative calls.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The open-source code of the proposed methods, together with test data, is freely available for non-commercial users at github web page https://github.com/jbudis/lambda.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary materials are available at Bioinformatics online.

Implementation of cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in a National Health Service Regional Genetics Laboratory

Background

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of foetal aneuploidy through analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood is offered routinely by many healthcare providers across the developed world. This testing has recently been recommended for evaluative implementation in the UK National Health Service (NHS) foetal anomaly screening pathway as a contingent screen following an increased risk of trisomy 21, 18 or 13. In preparation for delivering a national service, we have implemented cfDNA-based NIPT in our Regional Genetics Laboratory. Here, we describe our validation and verification processes and initial experiences of the technology prior to rollout of a national screening service.

Methods

Data are presented from more than 1000 patients (215 retrospective and 840 prospective) from ‘high- and low-risk pregnancies’ with outcome data following birth or confirmatory invasive prenatal sampling. NIPT was by the Illumina Verifi® test.

Results

Our data confirm a high-fidelity service with a failure rate of ~0.24% and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of foetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21. Secondly, the data show that a significant proportion of patients continue their pregnancies without prenatal invasive testing or intervention after receiving a high-risk cfDNA-based result. A total of 46.5% of patients referred to date were referred for reasons other than high screen risk. Ten percent (76/840 clinical service referrals) of patients were referred with ultrasonographic finding of a foetal structural anomaly, and data analysis indicates high- and low-risk scan indications for NIPT.

Conclusions

NIPT can be successfully implemented into NHS regional genetics laboratories to provide high-quality services. NHS provision of NIPT in patients with high-risk screen results will allow for a reduction of invasive testing and partially improve equality of access to cfDNA-based NIPT in the pregnant population. Patients at low risk for a classic trisomy or with other clinical indications are likely to continue to access cfDNA-based NIPT as a private test.

[Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing in 6804 pregnant women aged less than 35 years with positive results in serum screening]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing for detecting chromosome aneuploid in pregnant women aged less than 35 years with positive results in serum screening.

METHODS

We analyzed the plasma cellfree fetal DNA in a total of 6804 pregnant women aged less than 35 years with singleton pregnancy from Foshan maternal and child health care hospital, whose weeks of gestation ranged from 12 to 24 weeks with ages on the expected date of confinement of 21-34 years. According to the results of serum screening, the women were divided to high-risk group and critical-risk group. Amniocentesis or cordocentesis was carried out if the results of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing were positive, and karyotyping or/and high-throughput sequencing was performed as the golden standard. All the women were followed up by telephone calls to assess the accuracy of the prenatal testing.

RESULTS

Noninvasive prenatal testing was successfully completed in all the 6081 cases. In the high-risk group, 70 women with positive results were tested by noninvasive prenatal testing, among whom 53 were confirmed by karyotyping or high-throughput sequencing. In this group, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of trisomy 21 syndrome detection was 95.65%, 99.91% and 88.0%, respectively, with a false positive rate of 0.09% and a false negative rate of 4.35%; the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for trisomy 18 syndrome was 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, with false positive and false negative rates of 0; the false positive rate and false negative rate for trisomy 13 syndrome was 0.09% and 0, respectively; the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for sex chromosome aneuploid as 100%, 99.80% and 30.0%, respectively, with a false positive rate of 0.2% and a false negative rate of 0; the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for other chromosome aneuploid was 100%, 99.88% and 16.60%, respectively, with a false positive rate of 0.18% and a false negative rate of 0. In the critical risk group, 54 women with positive results received noninvasive prenatal genetic testing, among whom 36 were confirmed by karyotyping or high-throughput sequencing. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for trisomy 21 syndrome were all 100% and the false positive rate and false negative rate were both 0; the false positive rate was 0.11% and the false negative rate was 0 for trisomy 18 syndrome; the false positive rate and false negative rate for trisomy 13 syndrome was 0.04% and 0, respectively; the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for sex chromosome aneuploid was 100%, 99.79% and 50.0%, respectively, with a false positive rate of 0.21% and a false negative rate of 0; the false positive rate for other chromosome aneuploid was 0.18% and the false negative rate was 0. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and false positive rate for detection of trisomy 21 syndrome and sex chromosome aneuploid (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing is necessary for high-risk pregnant women with critical-risk in serum screening who refuse invasive prenatal diagnosis, and it is highly sensitive and specific fir detecting chromosome aneuploid with low false positive and false negative rates.

Circulating DNA, a Potentially Sensitive and Specific Diagnostic Tool for Future Medicine

Liquid biopsy has the great potential of detecting early diseases before deterioration and is valued for screening abnormalities at early stage. In oncology, circulating DNA derived from shed cancer cells reflects the tissue of origin, so it could be used to locate tissue sites during early screening. However, the heterogenous parameters of different types limit the clinical application, making it inaccessible to encompass all the cancer types. Instead, for reproducible scenario as pregnancy, fetal cell-free DNA has been well utilized for screening aneuploidies. Noninvasive and convenient as is, it would be of great value in the next decades far more than early diagnosis. This review recapitulates the discovery and development of tumor and fetal cell-free DNA. The common factors are also present that could be taken into consideration when collecting, transporting, and preserving samples. Meanwhile, several protocols used for purifying cell-free DNA, either classic ones or through commercial kits, are compared carefully. In addition, the development of technologies for analyzing cell-free DNA have been summarized and discussed in detail, especially some up-to-date approaches. At the end, the potential prospect of circulating DNA is bravely depicted. In summary, although there would be a lot of efforts before it’s prevalent, cell-free DNA remains a promising tool in point-of-care diagnostic medicine.

Targeted capture enrichment followed by NGS: development and validation of a single comprehensive NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies, microdeletion syndromes and monogenic diseases

Background

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted for the detection of fetal aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes, nevertheless, limited clinical utilization has been reported for the non-invasive prenatal screening of monogenic diseases. In this study, we present the development and validation of a single comprehensive NIPT for prenatal screening of chromosomal aneuploidies, microdeletions and 50 autosomal recessive disorders associated with severe or moderate clinical phenotype.

Results

We employed a targeted capture enrichment technology powered by custom TArget Capture Sequences (TACS) and multi-engine bioinformatics analysis pipeline to develop and validate a novel NIPT test. This test was validated using 2033 cell-fee DNA (cfDNA) samples from maternal plasma of pregnant women referred for NIPT and paternal genomic DNA. Additionally, 200 amniotic fluid and CVS samples were used for validation purposes. All NIPT samples were correctly classified exhibiting 100% sensitivity (CI 89.7–100%) and 100% specificity (CI 99.8–100%) for chromosomal aneuploidies and microdeletions. Furthermore, 613 targeted causative mutations, of which 87 were unique, corresponding to 21 monogenic diseases, were identified. For the validation of the assay for prenatal diagnosis purposes, all aneuploidies, microdeletions and point mutations were correctly detected in all 200 amniotic fluid and CVS samples.

Conclusions

We present a NIPT for aneuploidies, microdeletions, and monogenic disorders. To our knowledge this is the first time that such a comprehensive NIPT is available for clinical implementation.

Adaptable Model Parameters in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Lead to More Stable Predictions

Recent advances in massively parallel shotgun sequencing opened up new options for affordable non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetus aneuploidy from DNA material extracted from maternal plasma. Tests typically compare chromosomal distributions of a tested sample with a control set of healthy samples with unaffected fetuses. Deviations above certain threshold levels are concluded as positive findings. The main problem with this approach is that the variance of the control set is dependent on the number of sequenced fragments. The higher the amount, the more precise the estimation of actual chromosomal proportions is. Testing a sample with a highly different number of sequenced reads as used in training may thus lead to over- or under-estimation of their variance, and so lead to false predictions. We propose the calculation of a variance for each tested sample adaptively, based on the actual number of its sequenced fragments. We demonstrate how it leads to more stable predictions, mainly in real-world diagnostics with the highly divergent inter-sample coverage.

Clinical Validation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Common Aneuploidies in 1,055 Korean Pregnant Women: a Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma for fetal aneuploidy identification is expanding worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of NIPT for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 of high-risk fetus in a large Korean population.

METHODS

This study was performed retrospectively, using stored maternal plasma from 1,055 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis because of a high-risk indication for chromosomal abnormalities. The NIPT results were confirmed by karyotype analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1,055 cases, 108 cases of fetal aneuploidy, including trisomy 21 (n = 57), trisomy 18 (n = 42), and trisomy 13 (n = 9), were identified by NIPT. In this study, NIPT showed 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomy 21, and 92.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity for trisomy 18, and 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomy 13. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 98.1%. PPVs for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 ranged from 90.0% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that our NIPT technology is reliable and accurate when applied to maternal DNA samples collected from pregnant women. Further large prospective studies are needed to adequately assess the performance of NIPT.

A simple method to allow for guanine-cytosine amplification error in prenatal DNA screening for trisomy 18

BACKGROUND

A source of error in prenatal screening for trisomies is PCR amplification error associated with guanine-cytosine (GC) content of DNA fragments in maternal plasma. We describe a simple method of allowing for this.

METHODS

Data from a Reflex DNA screening programme (67 trisomy 18 and 83 unaffected pregnancies) were used to compare the ratio of chromosome 18 DNA fragment counts to chromosome 8 DNA fragment counts (because chromosome 8 has a similar GC content to chromosome 18) with the percentage of chromosome 18 DNA counts using counts from all autosomes in the denominator, with and without an all autosome correction for the GC content of the DNA fragments.

RESULTS

A chromosome 18 to 8 ratio of DNA fragment counts was more discriminatory than the percentage of all autosome counts arising from chromosome 18 without, or with an all autosome correction for GC content bias. It achieves a high screening performance, eg. for a 0.25% false-positive rate, a 97% detection rate instead of 49% without a correction for GC content, and 91% with an all autosome correction for GC content.

CONCLUSION

Consideration can be given to using the ratio of chromosome 18 DNA fragment counts to chromosome 8 DNA fragment counts in cell-free DNA prenatal screening for trisomy 18, avoiding the need for more complex methods of making a correction for the GC content currently used.

Recent trends in prenatal genetic screening and testing

Prenatal testing in recent years has been moving toward non-invasive methods to determine the fetal risk for genetic disorders without incurring the risk of miscarriage. Rapid progress of modern high-throughput molecular technologies along with the discovery of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma led to novel screening methods for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. Such tests are referred to as non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPTs), non-invasive prenatal screening, or prenatal cell-free DNA screening. Owing to many advantages, the adoption of NIPT in routine clinical practice was very rapid and global. As an example, NIPT has recently become a standard screening procedure for all pregnant women in the Netherlands. On the other hand, invasive sampling procedures remain important, especially for their diagnostic value in the confirmation of NIPT-positive findings and the detection of Mendelian disorders. In this review, we focus on current trends in the field of NIPT and discuss their benefits, drawbacks, and consequences in regard to routine diagnostics.

A gradual change of chromosome mosaicism from placenta to fetus leading to T18 false negative result by NIPS

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) has higher sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional prenatal screening. Nevertheless, the discordant results between the NIPS and prenatal diagnosis were occasionally reported. In current study, we investigated the genetic basis of a T18 fetus with a discordant trisomy 5 (T5) positive and trisomy 18 (T18) negative NIPS result.

METHODS

NIPS was used to detect fetal DNA in maternal circulating plasma based on semiconductor sequencing platform. The aneuploidies of the fetus and different part of placental tissues were investigated by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA).

RESULTS

The positive result of T5 was detected for the pregnant woman in NIPS, while T18 was found in the fetal karyotyping analysis after amniocentesis. Furthermore, placental mosaicism of T5 and T18 was found by CNV-seq and CMA, which revealed the mosaic ratio of T5 was gradually increased from umbilical cord to the placenta center, while that of T18 was gradually decreased.

CONCLUSION

For the reason of cell-free fetal DNA (cff DNA) in the maternal circulation originates from trophoblast cells of placenta, the level of placental mosaicism could cause false negative NIPS result in multiple aneuploidies. The present study proved that a discordant T5 positive and T18 negative NIPS result was caused by placental mosaicism. This study highlights placental mosaicism as a significant risk factor for discordant NIPS results. The result will be helpful for genetic counseling and clinical management of such pregnant woman.

Profile of women choosing the Harmony® Prenatal Test

INTRODUCTION

The Harmony® Prenatal Test, a noninvasive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) method for major trisomies has been available since January 2013 at our unit, and tests were sent to the Ariosa Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) laboratory in California. From July 2017 onward, prenatal cfDNA has been reimbursed in Belgium for all pregnancies; however, since then samples are sent to a local laboratory. Little data are available on patient's profile and choices toward cfDNA and on the performance of local technology transfer centers. Areas covered: The profiles and choices of women regarding this test were evaluated. Further, the performance of cfDNA at the local laboratory was compared to the one in California. Our results showed that women from the Netherlands, as compared to Belgium, were more likely to undergo cfDNA testing for maternal request and would be less likely to undergo karyotyping if cfDNA were unavailable, therefore are better candidates for cfDNA testing, when this is used as first-line screening. Expert commentary: Our findings highlight the importance of conducting these types of studies, before decisions about clinical implementation are made by national governments and ministries of health.

Biological explanations for discordant noninvasive prenatal test results: Preliminary data and lessons learned

OBJECTIVE

Maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis is a powerful screening tool for Down syndrome. In a pilot series, we examined biologic causes of discordance between the cfDNA test results and the fetal karyotype. We also explored the feasibility of obtaining trio biospecimens by using parental engagement.

METHODS

A convenience sample of women with discordant cfDNA results were recruited by their care providers. We provided shipping materials and instructions for biospecimen collection. Maternal, newborn, and placental samples were examined with droplet digital PCR.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 15 women successfully had biospecimens obtained remotely. High-quality DNA was extracted in 12 of 13 women. Presumed biologic etiologies for discordance were identified in 7 of 12 women: 3 cases from additional clinical review (male renal transplant, vanishing twin, and colon cancer) and 4 cases from additional laboratory investigation using droplet digital PCR (3 with confined placental mosaicism and 1 with true fetal mosaicism).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the biology behind cfDNA-fetal karyotype discordancy is useful for follow-up clinical care. Our study suggests that most cases could be resolved by using a trio biospecimen protocol and parental involvement. To improve accuracy, additional sequencing of biospecimens will be required.

Screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy diseases using noninvasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed to report the clinical characteristics of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy diseases using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in twin pregnancies and analyze the results in terms of chorionicity, conception, and fetal fraction.

METHODS

A total of 1160 women with twin pregnancies were recruited from 1 October 2015, to 1 August 2017. Next-generation sequencing technology was used to detect fetal aneuploidies, such as trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13 and trisomy X.

RESULTS

Aneuploidy was detected using NIPT in 26 fetuses, among which 18 fetal aneuploidies occurred in only one fetus of the twins. The rate of aneuploidy was 1.3% for dichorionic diamniotic twins and 0.5% for monochorionic diamniotic twins, respectively. The rate of aneuploidy was 1.2% for spontaneous pregnancy group and 1.1% for assisted reproductive technologies group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, detection of trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and X abnormality in twin pregnancies was confirmed to be accurate. The aneuploidies mostly occurred in only one fetus of the twins, and trisomy 21 was the most common type. The prenatal diagnostic standard for NIPT in singleton pregnancies could perform well in twin pregnancies, which means NIPT can be popularized as routine prenatal screening in twin pregnancies.

NIPTeR: an R package for fast and accurate trisomy prediction in non-invasive prenatal testing

Background

Various algorithms have been developed to predict fetal trisomies using cell-free DNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). As basis for prediction, a control group of non-trisomy samples is needed. Prediction accuracy is dependent on the characteristics of this group and can be improved by reducing variability between samples and by ensuring the control group is representative for the sample analyzed.

Results

NIPTeR is an open-source R Package that enables fast NIPT analysis and simple but flexible workflow creation, including variation reduction, trisomy prediction algorithms and quality control. This broad range of functions allows users to account for variability in NIPT data, calculate control group statistics and predict the presence of trisomies.

Conclusion

NIPTeR supports laboratories processing next-generation sequencing data for NIPT in assessing data quality and determining whether a fetal trisomy is present. NIPTeR is available under the GNU LGPL v3 license and can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/molgenis/NIPTeR or CRAN.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2557-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Enrichment of the fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal screening reduces maternal background interference

Measurement of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is an indispensable process for non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). According to recent studies, cffDNA in maternal plasma can be enriched for various lengths of fragments, and a sufficient amount of cffDNA can effectively eliminate background interference on the part of maternal DNA. Therefore, we developed a simple and effective separation method, improved NIPS (iNIPS), that enriches the fetal fraction and improves the accuracy of NIPS for fetal aneuploid detection. We adopted a novel strategy to achieve enrichment of 125–135 bp cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by e-gel electrophoresis. To evaluate clinical performance, we compared NIPS and iNIPS results from 2153 retrospective clinical samples. Of the 22 samples with NIPS results of “no call”, 17 samples were reclassified as “unaffected” (9 cases of chr13, 5 cases of chr18, and 3 cases of chr21); 2 samples remained classified as “no call” (1 case of chr18 and 1 case of chr21); and 3 samples were identified as T21 by iNIPS. The average increase in abundance of cfDNA fragments of 125–135 bp was 2.5 times, and the average decrease in maternal background interference was 1.3 times. On this basis, the detection of fetal aneuploidy was highly improved with the fetal fraction as low as 2%; iNIPS achieved 100% sensitivity and 99.90% specificity in retrospective samples.

Non-invasive prenatal aneuploidy testing: Critical diagnostic performance parameters predict sample z-score values

OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive prenatal aneuploidy testing (NIPT) by next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA in maternal plasma relies on chromosomal ratio (chr_ratio) measurements to detect aneuploid values that depart from euploid ratios. Diagnostic performances are known to depend on the fraction of fetal DNA (FF) present in maternal plasma, although how this translates into specific quantitative changes in specificity/positive predictive values and which other variables might also be important is not well understood.

DESIGN & METHODS

To explore this issue, theoretical relationships between FF and various measures of diagnostic performances were assessed for a range of parameter values. Empirical data from three NIPT assays were then used to validate theoretical calculations.

RESULTS

For a given positivity threshold, dramatic changes in specificity and positive predictive values (PPV) as a function of both FF and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the chr_ratio measurement were observed. Theoretically predicted and observed chr_ratio z-scores agreed closely, confirming the determinant impact of small changes in both FF and chr_ratio CV.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of NIPT assay performances therefore requires knowledge of the FF distribution in the population in which the test is intended to be used and, in particular, of the precise value of the assay chr_ratio CV for each chromosome or genomic region of interest. Laboratories offering NIPT testing should carefully measure these parameters to ensure test reliability and clinical usefulness in interpreting individual patients' results.

Prenatal cell-free DNA screening test failures: a systematic review of failure rates, risks of Down syndrome, and impact of repeat testing

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the published literature on test failure rates for the sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma to identify Down syndrome.

METHODS

We searched peer-reviewed English publications with diagnostic results on all pregnancies that provided test failure rates. Data on the odds of failure in Down syndrome and euploid pregnancies and the impact of repeat testing were extracted. Random-effects modeling was then used to identify moderators that could explain variability.

RESULTS

Thirty articles satisfied the inclusion criteria for overall failure rates. Study location (Western and Asian with initial testing, and Western with repeat testing) were significant moderators with failure rates of 3.3, 0.6, and 1.2%, respectively (P = 0.001). The odds ratio for Down syndrome in successful versus failed tests was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.55, I² = 0%). Repeat testing from 14 large clinical cohort studies found that 83% (range: 52-100%) of failures were repeated, with 79% (range: 46-97%) being successful.

CONCLUSION

Lower failure rates in Asian studies may be related to not routinely measuring the fetal fraction and to fewer obese women. Repeat cfDNA testing is effective in providing reliable results after initial failures. Protocols for primary cfDNA screening should focus on Down syndrome, with less common and more structurally abnormal trisomy 18 and 13 pregnancies treated as adjuncts.

Sex chromosome aneuploidy detection by noninvasive prenatal testing: helpful or hazardous?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) predicted by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), assess test performance, and compare it with nuchal translucency (NT) screening among patients seen in our prenatal diagnosis center.

METHODS

We identified suspected cases of SCA by reviewing results from all NIPT samples sent from our center to commercial laboratories offering analysis by cell-free DNA between 1 December 2012 and 31 July 2015. Records of pregnancies positive for SCA were reviewed for ultrasound findings, NIPT indications, and karyotype results on maternal, fetal, and postnatal samples. Other SCA cases presenting during this period regardless of NIPT status were identified from genetic counseling and cytogenetics laboratory logbooks.

RESULTS

Noninvasive prenatal testing predicted SCA in 18/2851 patients (0.63%). All had diagnostic testing of fetal or newborn samples. No patients terminated pregnancies on the basis of NIPT. NIPT suggested triple X in five cases, two with elevated NT: all were confirmed on karyotype. Two Klinefelter syndrome cases were also accurately predicted by NIPT. NIPT indicated monosomy X in 11 cases. Only one was a true positive. Ten were false positives, with 46, XX found on fetal or newborn karyotype. Maternal karyotype was mosaic (45, X[4], 46, XX[26]) in one case. Over the same time period, four additional cases of 45, X were confirmed on fetal samples, all with cystic hygromas. One of these had had a false negative NIPT result. The remaining patients pursued only direct testing via CVS or amniocentesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex chromosome aneuploidy was frequently suspected on NIPT. False positive rate for monosomy X was surprisingly high (91%). Prediction of other SCA was more accurate. Diagnostic fetal chromosome analysis should be offered after abnormal NIPT or in the presence of cystic hygromas despite normal NIPT. NIPT limitations should be explained in pretest counseling. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The value of cell-free DNA for molecular pathology

Over the past decade, advances in molecular biology and genomics techniques have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The technological advances in tissue profiling have also been applied to the study of cell-free nucleic acids, an area of increasing interest for molecular pathology. Cell-free nucleic acids are released from tumour cells into the surrounding body fluids and can be assayed non-invasively. The repertoire of genomic alterations in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is reflective of both primary tumours and distant metastatic sites, and ctDNA can be sampled multiple times, thereby overcoming the limitations of the analysis of single biopsies. Furthermore, ctDNA can be sampled regularly to monitor response to treatment, to define the evolution of the tumour genome, and to assess the acquisition of resistance and minimal residual disease. Recently, clinical ctDNA assays have been approved for guidance of therapy, which is an exciting first step in translating cell-free nucleic acid research tests into clinical use for oncology. In this review, we discuss the advantages of cell-free nucleic acids as analytes in different body fluids, including blood plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, and their clinical applications in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. We will also discuss practical considerations for clinical deployment, such as preanalytical factors and regulatory requirements. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Conflict of interest related to clinical practice is underreported: The case of noninvasive prenatal testing

Authors of policy statements from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine do not acknowledge the potential for their clinical income to influence their opinions, or the positions of the societies they represent. These policy statements were published in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, again, without acknowledgment of the potential for conflict of interest. The case of noninvasive prenatal testing, which has threatened the role of maternal-fetal medicine in the practice of prenatal screening and diagnosis, and has significantly reduced the demand for invasive prenatal diagnosis, illustrates the importance of identifying this potential conflict.

Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women

BACKGROUND

Common fetal aneuploidies include Down syndrome (trisomy 21 or T21), Edward syndrome (trisomy 18 or T18), Patau syndrome (trisomy 13 or T13), Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Triple X syndrome (47,XXX) and 47,XYY syndrome (47,XYY). Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies is standard care in many countries, but current biochemical and ultrasound tests have high false negative and false positive rates. The discovery of fetal circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) in maternal blood offers the potential for genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing (gNIPT) as a more accurate screening method. Two approaches used for gNIPT are massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS) and targeted massively parallel sequencing (TMPS).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MPSS and TMPS for gNIPT as a first-tier test in unselected populations of pregnant women undergoing aneuploidy screening or as a second-tier test in pregnant women considered to be high risk after first-tier screening for common fetal aneuploidies. The gNIPT results were confirmed by a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or neonatal clinical examination.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched 13 databases (including MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) from 1 January 2007 to 12 July 2016 without any language, search filter or publication type restrictions. We also screened reference lists of relevant full-text articles, websites of private prenatal diagnosis companies and conference abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies could include pregnant women of any age, ethnicity and gestational age with singleton or multifetal pregnancy. The women must have had a screening test for fetal aneuploidy by MPSS or TMPS and a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or medical records from birth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently carried out study selection, data extraction and quality assessment (using the QUADAS-2 tool). Where possible, hierarchical models or simpler alternatives were used for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five studies of 86,139 pregnant women (3141 aneuploids and 82,998 euploids) were included. No study was judged to be at low risk of bias across the four domains of the QUADAS-2 tool but applicability concerns were generally low. Of the 65 studies, 42 enrolled pregnant women at high risk, five recruited an unselected population and 18 recruited cohorts with a mix of prior risk of fetal aneuploidy. Among the 65 studies, 44 evaluated MPSS and 21 evaluated TMPS; of these, five studies also compared gNIPT with a traditional screening test (biochemical, ultrasound or both). Forty-six out of 65 studies (71%) reported gNIPT assay failure rate, which ranged between 0% and 25% for MPSS, and between 0.8% and 7.5% for TMPS.In the population of unselected pregnant women, MPSS was evaluated by only one study; the study assessed T21, T18 and T13. TMPS was assessed for T21 in four studies involving unselected cohorts; three of the studies also assessed T18 and 13. In pooled analyses (88 T21 cases, 22 T18 cases, eight T13 cases and 20,649 unaffected pregnancies (non T21, T18 and T13)), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of TMPS was 99.2% (78.2% to 100%), 90.9% (70.0% to 97.7%) and 65.1% (9.16% to 97.2%) for T21, T18 and T13, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificity was above 99.9% for T21, T18 and T13.In high-risk populations, MPSS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in 30, 28, 20 and 12 studies, respectively. In pooled analyses (1048 T21 cases, 332 T18 cases, 128 T13 cases and 15,797 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of MPSS was 99.7% (98.0% to 100%), 97.8% (92.5% to 99.4%), 95.8% (86.1% to 98.9%) and 91.7% (78.3% to 97.1%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificities (95% CI) were 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.8% (99.8% to 99.9%) and 99.6% (98.9% to 99.8%). In this risk group, TMPS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in six, five, two and four studies. In pooled analyses (246 T21 cases, 112 T18 cases, 20 T13 cases and 4282 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% CI) of TMPS was 99.2% (96.8% to 99.8%), 98.2% (93.1% to 99.6%), 100% (83.9% to 100%) and 92.4% (84.1% to 96.5%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X respectively. The clinical specificities were above 100% for T21, T18 and T13 and 99.8% (98.3% to 100%) for 45,X. Indirect comparisons of MPSS and TMPS for T21, T18 and 45,X showed no statistical difference in clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity or both. Due to limited data, comparative meta-analysis of MPSS and TMPS was not possible for T13.We were unable to perform meta-analyses of gNIPT for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47,XYY because there were very few or no studies in one or more risk groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These results show that MPSS and TMPS perform similarly in terms of clinical sensitivity and specificity for the detection of fetal T31, T18, T13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). However, no study compared the two approaches head-to-head in the same cohort of patients. The accuracy of gNIPT as a prenatal screening test has been mainly evaluated as a second-tier screening test to identify pregnancies at very low risk of fetal aneuploidies (T21, T18 and T13), thus avoiding invasive procedures. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing methods appear to be sensitive and highly specific for detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in high-risk populations. There is paucity of data on the accuracy of gNIPT as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test in a population of unselected pregnant women. With respect to the replacement of invasive tests, the performance of gNIPT observed in this review is not sufficient to replace current invasive diagnostic tests.We conclude that given the current data on the performance of gNIPT, invasive fetal karyotyping is still the required diagnostic approach to confirm the presence of a chromosomal abnormality prior to making irreversible decisions relative to the pregnancy outcome. However, most of the gNIPT studies were prone to bias, especially in terms of the selection of participants.

Detection of fetal duplication 16p11.2q12.1 by next-generation sequencing of maternal plasma and invasive diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of study is to report the feasibility of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) combined with invasive detection by chromosomal analysis in identifying fetal duplication, providing clinical performance of NIPS on copy number variations (CNVs) detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

NIPS was offered to a 35-year-old pregnant woman. Amniocentesis was performed to confirm the positive screening result. Fetal sample was detected by karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromosomal microarray (CMA). Parental karyotyping was also conducted.

RESULTS

NIPS result was positive for chromosome 16, indicating an extra copy of chromosome 16. FISH and chromosomal karyotyping revealed that the fetus had a marker chromosome derived from chromosome 16. CMA further demonstrated an approximately 19-Mb duplication in chromosome 16. The final fetal karyotype was 47,XY,+mar. ish der (16)(D16Z3+).arr 16p11.2q12.1 (30 624 186-49 696 337 × 3). Ultrasound scan and MRI showed some structure malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol for CNVs detection by combining a series of genetic methods was presented in this study and a novel marker duplication 16p11.2q12.1 was reported. With the ability to identify subchromosomal deletions and duplications in fetus, NIPS could reduce the possibility of invasive diagnosis. The followed confirmation test for positive sample is necessary and ensures the accuracy of the diagnosis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal DNA testing for trisomy 21: implications for implementation in China

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review clinical validation studies of massive parallel sequencing (MPS) technology in prenatal screening for trisomy 21 and to explore the potential implementation strategies in China compared with those in developing countries.

METHODS

Searches of the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Biosis Previews, and three major Chinese databases were performed to identify all the peer-reviewed articles published between 1 January 2011 and 15 October 2016. We also reviewed and discussed the potential challenges and risks in the future promotion of MPS technology in China compared with those in developing countries.

RESULTS

The weighted pooled sensitivity and specificity of MPS technology for the prenatal detection of trisomy 21 were 99.7% (95% CI 98.3-99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI 99.9-100.0%), respectively, based on a meta-analysis of 44 included studies. An additional meta-analysis was conducted based on the 25 included studies that were performed in medical/genetic sequencing institutions in mainland China, showing a weighted pooled sensitivity and specificity of MPS technology as 99.5% (95% CI 98.7-99.8%) and 100% (95% CI 99.9-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

MPS technology offers effective screening performance for trisomy 21 but should be cautiously promoted due to its clinical limitations and challenges that stem from the ethics and business aspects. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.