Sample Type and Storage Conditions Affect Calprotectin Measurements in Blood

Assessment of the predictive value of plasma calprotectin in the evolution of SARS-Cov-2 primo-infection

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 epidemic still calls for anticipation aimed at preventing the overloading of critical care services. With this in mind, the predictive value of easily accessible biomarkers is to be assessed.

OBJECTIVE

Secretion of calprotectin is stimulated during an inflammatory process, especially in the cytokine storm. We tried to determine whether early plasma concentration of calprotectin in patients with primary SARS-CoV-2 infection could predict an adverse outcome in cases of COVID-19.

METHODS

We included 308 patients with a primary diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by PCR. Heparinized tube samples, collected within the first 24 h of hospitalization, were used for biomarker assays, in which plasma calprotectin was included. Data from the patients' medical records and severity groups established subsequent to diagnosis at the end of hospitalization were collected.

RESULTS

Early plasma calprotectin concentration is significantly associated with progression to a severe form of COVID-19 in patients with primary infection (Relative Risk: 2.2 [1.6-2.7]). In multivariate analysis, however, it does not appear to provide additional information compared to other parameters (age, GFR, CRP…).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that while an early single blood test for calprotectin could help to predict the progression of a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not superior to the other parameters currently used in emergency medicine. However, it paves the way for future considerations, such as the interest of this biomarker for high-risk infected patients (immunocompromised individuals…). Finally, the usefulness of early serial measurements of plasma calprotectin to assess progression towards severity of COVID-19 requires further assessment.

Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

this is an exploratory study to evaluate calprotectin serum levels in patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

METHODS

this is a retrospective observational study including patients with irAEs rheumatic syndromes. We compared the calprotectin levels to those in a control group of patients with RA and with a control group of healthy individuals. Additionally, we included a control group of patients treated with ICI but without irAEs to check calprotectin levels. We also analysed the performance of calprotectin for the identification of active rheumatic disease using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).

RESULTS

18 patients with rheumatic irAEs were compared to a control group of 128 RA patients and another group of 29 healthy donors. The mean calprotectin level in the irAE group was 5.15 μg/mL, which was higher than the levels in both the RA group (3.19 μg/mL) and the healthy group (3.81 μg/mL) (cut-off 2 μg/mL). Additionally, 8 oncology patients without irAEs were included. In this group, calprotectin levels were similar to those of the healthy controls. In patients with active inflammation, the calprotectin levels in the irAE group were significantly higher (8.43 μg/mL) compared to the RA group (3.94 μg/mL). ROC curve analysis showed that calprotectin had a very good discriminatory capacity to identify inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs (AUC of 0.864).

CONCLUSIONS

the results suggest that calprotectin may serve as a marker of inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs induced by treatment with ICIs.

Analytical and clinical evaluation of DiaSorin Liaison® Calprotectin fecal assay adapted for serum samples

Background

Calprotectin is a calcium‐binding protein that can be measured in serum, plasma, and feces. Increased serum and plasma calprotectin concentrations have been found in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders. An analytical and clinical evaluation of the DiaSorin Liaison® fecal Calprotectin assay using LIAISON® XL was performed.

Methods

The protocol included an analytical and clinical evaluation in which imprecision, the linearity of dilution, differences between serum and plasma samples and method comparison with CalproLab™ ELISA kit were assessed. Serum calprotectin concentrations in active (n = 26) and remission (n = 23) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were compared.

Results

The intra‐day and inter‐day analytical imprecision CVs ranged from 2.9% to 4.0% and 2.7% to 10.4%, respectively. Correlation between measured and expected values was high (R > 0.99), indicating good linearity. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test showed that serum and plasma matched samples presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) being the highest concentrations of calprotectin observed in serum samples. Deming regression equation was as follows: Diasorin calprotectin (μg/ml) = −0.32 (95% CI: −0.65 ‐ −0.05) +1.58 (95% CI: 1.42–1.79).* Calprolab calprotectin (μg/ml). Significantly higher serum calprotectin levels were found in RA patients with active disease when compared to patients with low disease activity or in clinical remission (mean ± SD) [(3.35 μg/ml ± 1.55) vs. (1.63 μg/ml ± 0.52), p < 0.001] and these levels correlated well with all disease activity indices.

Conclusions

The DiaSorin Liaison® fecal Calprotectin assay adapted for serum samples showed adequate technical performances and the clinical performances were similar to other assays.

Prognostic value of circulating calprotectin levels on the clinical course of COVID-19 differs between serum, heparin, EDTA and citrate sample types

INTRODUCTION

During the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, circulating calprotectin (cCLP) gained interest as biomarker to predict the severity of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cCLP measured in serum, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

COVID-19 patients were prospectively included, in parallel with two SARS-CoV-2 negative control populations. The prognostic value of cCLP was compared with IL-6, CRP, LDH, procalcitonin, and the 4C-mortality score by AUROC analysis.

RESULTS

For the 136 COVID-19 patients, cCLP levels were higher compared to the respective control populations, with significantly higher cCLP levels in serum and heparin than in EDTA or citrate. Higher cCLP levels were obtained for COVID-19 patients with i) severe/critical illness (n = 70), ii) ICU admission (n = 66) and iii) need for mechanical ventilation/ECMO (n = 25), but iv) not in patients who deceased within 30 days (n = 41). The highest discriminatory power (AUC [95% CI]) for each defined outcome was i) CRP (0.835 [0.755-0.914]); ii) EDTA cCLP (0.780 [0.688-0.873]); iii) EDTA cCLP (0.842 [0.758-0.925]) and iv) the 4C-mortality score (0.713 [0.608-0.818]).

CONCLUSION

Measuring cCLP in COVID-19 patients helps the clinician to predict the clinical course of COVID-19. The discriminatory power of EDTA and citrate plasma cCLP levels often outperforms heparin plasma cCLP levels.

Inflammation-Related Marker Profiling of Dietary Patterns and All-cause Mortality in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Nutritional epidemiology research using self-reported dietary intake is prone to measurement error. Objective methods are being explored to overcome this limitation.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine 1) the association between plasma markers related to inflammation and derive marker scores for dietary patterns [Mediterranean dietary score (MDS), energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DIITM), Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 (AHEI)] and 2) the associations of these marker scores with mortality.

METHODS

Weighted marker scores were derived from the cross-sectional association between 30 plasma markers and each dietary score (assessed using food-frequency questionnaires) using linear regression for 770 participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (aged 50-82 y). Prospective associations between marker scores and mortality (n = 249 deaths) were assessed using Cox regression (median follow-up: 14.4 y).

RESULTS

The MDS, E-DII, and AHEI were associated (P < 0.05) with 9, 14, and 11 plasma markers, respectively. Healthier diets (higher MDS and AHEI, and lower anti-inflammatory, E-DII) were associated with lower concentrations of kynurenines, neopterin, IFN-γ, cytokines, and C-reactive protein. Five of 6 markers common to the 3 dietary scores were components of the kynurenine pathway. The 3 dietary-based marker scores were highly correlated (Spearman ρ: -0.74, -0.82, and 0.93). Inverse associations (for 1-SD increment) were observed with all-cause mortality for the MDS marker score (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98) and the AHEI marker score (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.89), whereas a positive association was observed with the E-DII marker score (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.39). The same magnitude of effect was not observed for the respective dietary patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers involved in inflammation-related processes are associated with dietary quality, including a substantial overlap between markers associated with the MDS, the E-DII, and the AHEI, especially kynurenines. Unfavorable marker scores, reflecting poorer-quality diets, were associated with increased mortality.

Correlation of calprotectin serum levels with degrees of endometriosis: A cross-sectional study

Background

Endometriosis is closely associated with delayed diagnosis due to the lack of a definitive and sensitive noninvasive approach. The use of calprotectin in inflammatory process has been demonstrated in various inflammatory diseases. Calprotectin has a significant correlation with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and could be used as an inflammatory marker. No study thus far has evaluated the correlation between calprotectin and endometriosis.

Objective

To determine the correlation of calprotectin with the degree of endometriosis in order to help clinicians in establishing better early detection and management.

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 46 women referred to the Cipto Mangunkusumo, Fatmawati, and Persahabatan Hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia between July 2017 and April 2018 were enrolled, and their blood serum were taken a day before surgery. Calprotectin serum level was treated using the PhicalⓇ ELISA method. After the diagnosis of endometriosis was confirmed through pathological examination, the final diagnosis of endometriosis could be established. The degree of endometriosis was classified according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification.

Results

The prevalence of minimal, mild, moderate, and severe degrees of endometriosis were 15.2, 39.1, 34.8, and 10.9%, respectively. The median serum calprotectin levels for minimal, mild, moderate, and severe endometriosis were 138.98, 121.49, 124.16, and 122.82 mg/mL, respectively. No correlation was observed between calprotectin and the degrees of endometriosis (r = –0.16, p = 0.278).

Conclusion

There is no correlation between calprotectin serum levels and the degrees of endometriosis.

Clinical Laboratory Biosafety Gaps: Lessons Learned from Past Outbreaks Reveal a Path to a Safer Future

Patient care and public health require timely, reliable laboratory testing. However, clinical laboratory professionals rarely know whether patient specimens contain infectious agents, making ensuring biosafety while performing testing procedures challenging. The importance of biosafety in clinical laboratories was highlighted during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, where concerns about biosafety resulted in delayed diagnoses and contributed to patient deaths. This review is a collaboration between subject matter experts from large and small laboratories and the federal government to evaluate the capability of clinical laboratories to manage biosafety risks and safely test patient specimens. We discuss the complexity of clinical laboratories, including anatomic pathology, and describe how applying current biosafety guidance may be difficult as these guidelines, largely based on practices in research laboratories, do not always correspond to the unique clinical laboratory environments and their specialized equipment and processes. We retrospectively describe the biosafety gaps and opportunities for improvement in the areas of risk assessment and management; automated and manual laboratory disciplines; specimen collection, processing, and storage; test utilization; equipment and instrumentation safety; disinfection practices; personal protective equipment; waste management; laboratory personnel training and competency assessment; accreditation processes; and ethical guidance. Also addressed are the unique biosafety challenges successfully handled by a Texas community hospital clinical laboratory that performed testing for patients with Ebola without a formal biocontainment unit. The gaps in knowledge and practices identified in previous and ongoing outbreaks demonstrate the need for collaborative, comprehensive solutions to improve clinical laboratory biosafety and to better combat future emerging infectious disease outbreaks.

Circulating Calprotectin as a Biomarker of COVID-19 Severity

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although demographic and clinical parameters such as sex, age, comorbidities, genetic background and various biomarkers have been identified as risk factors, there is an unmet need to predict the risk and onset of severe inflammatory disease leading to poor clinical outcomes. In addition, very few mechanistic biomarkers are available to inform targeted treatment of severe (auto)-inflammatory conditions associated with COVID-19. Calprotectin, also known as S100A8/S100A9, MRP8/14 (Myeloid-Related Protein) or L1, is a heterodimer involved in neutrophil-related inflammatory processes. In COVID-19 patients, calprotectin levels were reported to be associated with poor clinical outcomes such as significantly reduced survival time, especially in patients with severe pulmonary disease.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed was searched using the following keywords: Calprotectin + COVID19, S100A8/A9 + COVID19, S100A8 + COVID-19, S100A9 + COVID-19, MRP8/14 + COVID19; L1 + COVID-19 between May 2020 and 8 March 2021. The results summarized in this review provide supporting evidence and propose future directions that define calprotectin as an important biomarker in COVID-19.

EXPERT OPINION

Calprotectin represents a promising serological biomarker for the risk assessment of COVID-19 patients.

Circulating calprotectin as biomarker in neutrophil-related inflammation: Pre-analytical recommendations and reference values according to sample type

BACKGROUND

Calprotectin (CLP) is a promising biomarker for the evaluation of neutrophil-related inflammation. Our aim was to establish reference values for circulating CLP in different sample types and to study the effect of pre-analytical variables.

METHODS

Reference values were determined in 100 healthy individuals. Pre-analytical variables were evaluated in 10 healthy controls and four rheumatoid arthritis patients with active disease and covered sample type (serum with/without gel separator, heparin, EDTA and citrate plasma), pre-centrifugation time (<2 h, 6 h, 24 h), storage condition (2-8 °C, 18-25 °C, 30 °C) and storage time (24 h, 72 h, 7 days). CLP measurements were performed with the EliA™Calprotectin 2 assay on Phadia™200 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RESULTS

In healthy controls, baseline CLP concentrations in serum were more than double the concentration in EDTA and citrate plasma (0.909 µg/mL versus 0.259 µg/mL and 0.261 µg/mL respectively). Heparin, EDTA and citrate stabilized CLP concentrations for up to 6 h before centrifugation, whereas significant increases in CLP levels were observed when serum was left untreated during that time period.

CONCLUSION

Clinical studies on circulating CLP need to apply sample type-specific reference values and decision limits. To obtain reproducible CLP results in serum, more stringent pre-analytical sample handling instructions are needed.

Microheterogeneity and preanalytical stability of protein biomarkers of inflammation and renal function

Protein biomarker microheterogeneity has attracted increasing attention in epidemiological and clinical research studies. Knowledge concerning the preanalytical stability of proteins is paramount to assess the biological significance of their proteoforms. We investigated the stability of the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and calprotectin (S100A8/9), and the renal function marker, cystatin C (CnC). In total 16 proteoforms were quantified by immuno-MALDI-TOF MS in EDTA plasma and serum samples from 15 healthy volunteers. Prior to analysis blood samples were stored at either room temperature from 1 h up to 8 days, or underwent up to 9 consecutive freeze/thaw cycles. Pearson's correlation coefficient and t-test, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Autoregressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA) models were used to investigate the stability of proteoform concentrations and distributions in blood. Plasma and serum concentrations of CRP and SAA proteoforms were highly stable during room temperature exposure and repeated freeze/thaw cycles, demonstrating excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.75), no serial dependency in ARIMA models, and stable distribution of proteoforms. Stability analyses for proteoforms of S100A8/9 and CnC identified only minor preanalytical changes in concentrations and distributions, and none of the proteoforms were produced during prolonged exposure to room temperature or repeated freezing/thawing. The four proteins and their proteoforms are stable during sub-optimal sample handling, and represent robust biomarker candidates for future biobank studies aimed at investigating the microheterogeneity of SAA, S100A8/9, and CnC in relation to inflammation, renal dysfunction and various clinical outcomes.

Pre-analytical and analytical confounders of serum calprotectin as a biomarker in rheumatoid arthritis

Background There is a need for additional biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of our study was to evaluate the (pre-analytical, analytical and clinical) performance of serum calprotectin as a marker of inflammation in RA. Methods The study population included 463 rheumatologic patients (including 111 RA patients and 352 controls) who for the first time consulted a rheumatologist, 20 healthy controls and 27 patients with an infectious disease. Calprotectin was measured (using four different assays) in serum or in serum and EDTA plasma (healthy controls and infectious disease group). For rheumatologic patients, results for C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) were available. Results Results for blood calprotectin were assay- and matrix-dependent, with higher values found in serum than in plasma. Serum calprotectin was higher in RA patients than in rheumatologic diseased controls and in healthy controls. Serum calprotectin was lower in RA patients than in patients with an infectious disease. Serum calprotectin was associated with disease activity (DAS score). The area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate RA from controls was 0.756 for CRP, 0.714 for ESR and 0.726-0.783 for calprotectin. Conclusions Our data document that calprotectin measurement is assay- and matrix-dependent. Serum calprotectin is associated with disease activity. Additional (prospective) studies are warranted to further evaluate the prognostic and diagnostic value of blood calprotectin measurements.

Measuring calprotectin in plasma and blood with a fully automated turbidimetric assay

Calprotectin in plasma and blood might prove to be a useful biomarker of inflammation and infection; however, automated methods for analysing the concentration of calprotectin in those materials are lacking. We have validated a fully automated turbidimetric method and present health-related reference limits. Calprotectin was measured by Siemens Advia XPT with the Bühlmann fCAL® turbo test (Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland), a particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of calprotectin in fecal extracts. Plasma and serum samples were analysed directly, while whole blood was first extracted with M-PER® Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (ThermoFisher) and diluted with B-CAL-EX (Bühlmann). We studied analytical imprecision, estimated health-related reference limits and examined the correlation between neutrophil-calprotectin (blood-calprotectin adjusted for plasma-calprotectin) and the neutrophil count. The intermediate ('day-to-day') coefficient of variation was 3.5 and 1.0% for heparin-plasma-calprotectin at 0.52 mg/L and 3.53 mg/L, respectively, and 4.9% for heparin-blood-calprotectin at 50.2 mg/L. Health-related reference limits were 0.470-3.02 mg/L for calprotectin in heparin-plasma, 50.8-182 mg/L for calprotectin in heparin-blood, 0.534-2.41% for the ratio between them and 24.7-33.3 pg for the mean amount of calprotectin per neutrophil. Compared to heparin-plasma, calprotectin concentrations were significantly lower in EDTA-plasma and higher in serum (p < .05). Correlation between neutrophil-calprotectin and the neutrophil count was excellent. We have shown that the Bühlmann fCAL® turbo test can be used to measure calprotectin in plasma and blood.