The role of colonization with resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the treatment of febrile neutropenia after stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common complication of stem cell transplantation.

AIM

To evaluate the frequency of sepsis in patients with FN colonized with resistant Gram-negative bacteria (extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and the choice of primary antibiotic in colonized patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed data from patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2018 to September 2022. Data were extracted from the hospital information system.

FINDINGS

Carbapenem as the primary antibiotic of choice was chosen in 10.9% of non-colonized +/-AmpC patients, 31.5% of ESBL+ patients, and 0% of MDR P. aeruginosa patients. Patients with FN and MDR P. aeruginosa colonization had a high prevalence of sepsis (namely 100%, P = 0.0197). The spectrum of sepsis appeared to be different, with Gram-negative bacilli predominating in the ESBL+ group (OR: 5.39; 95% CI: 1.55-18.76; P = 0.0123). Colonizer sepsis was present in 100% of sepsis with MDR P. aeruginosa colonization (P = 0.002), all in allogeneic transplantation (P = 0.0003), with a mortality rate of 33.3% (P = 0.0384). The incidence of sepsis in patients with ESBL+ colonization was 25.9% (P = 0.0197), with colonizer sepsis in 50% of sepsis cases (P = 0.0002), most in allogeneic transplantation (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

The results show a significant risk of sepsis in FN with MDR P. aeruginosa colonization, a condition almost exclusively caused by the colonizer. At the same time, a higher risk of Gram-negative sepsis has been demonstrated in patients colonized with ESBL+ bacteria.

A prolonged intensive care unit stay defines a worse long-term prognosis - Insights from the critically ill mortality by age (Cimba) study

BACKGROUND

Patients with critical illness often survive the intensive care unit (ICU) at a cost of prolonged length of stay (LOS) and slow recovery. This chronic critically ill disease may lead to long-term poor outcomes, especially in older or frail patients.

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of this study was to address the characteristics and outcomes of patients with prolonged ICU LOS. Mainly, short- and long-term admissions were compared to identify risk factors for persistent critical illness and to characterise the impact on ICU, hospital, and long-term mortality.

METHODS

Subanalysis of a retrospective, multicentric, observational study addressing the 2-year outcome of patients admitted to Portuguese ICUs (the Cimba study). Patients were segregated according to an ICU LOS of ≥14 days.

RESULTS

Data from 37 118 patients were analysed, featuring a median ICU LOS of 4 days (percentile: 25-75 2-9), and a mortality of 16.1% in the ICU, 24.0% in the hospital, and 38.7% after 2 years. A total of 5334 patients (14.4%) had an ICU LOS of ≥14 days (corresponding to 48.9% of all ICU patients/days). Patients with prolonged LOS were more often younger (52.8% vs 46.4%, were ≤65 years of age , p < 0.001), although more severe (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: 49.1 ± 16.9 vs 41.8 ± 19.5, p < 0.001), and had higher ICU and hospital mortality (18.3% vs 15.7%, and 31.2 vs 22.8%, respectively). Prolonged ICU LOS was linked to an increased risk of dying during the 2-year follow-up (adjusted Cox proportional hazard: 1.65, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged LOS is associated with a long-term impact on patient prognosis. More careful planning of care should incorporate these data.

[Relatives after a stay on the intensive care unit: a care gap to be closed]

Structures for the care of relatives after a stay on the intensive care unit are present in principle, but no systematic interfaces between the different types of care and the care sectors exists. Therefore, in a first step, the needs of relatives during intensive care treatment should be continuously assessed and addressed as early as possible. Furthermore, proactive provision of information regarding aftercare services is necessary throughout the entire course of hospitalization and rehabilitation, but also in the phase of general practitioner care. The patient's hospital discharge letter with a detailed social history can serve information transfer at the interfaces.

Perfil Clínico dos Pacientes Críticos Oncológicos com Covid-19

Introdução: A infecção por Sars-CoV-2 possui um amplo espectro clínico, que pode ser categorizado pelo seu nível de severidade. Ser paciente oncológico está descrito na literatura como fator de risco importante em níveis mais severos da doença decorrente do estado de imunossupressão. Objetivo: Comparar as características demográficas e clínicas entre pacientes oncológicos e não oncológicos com covid-19 em um hospital de referência na cidade de Belém, Pará. Método: Estudo retrospectivo e quantitativo de análise de prontuários de pacientes diagnosticados com covid-19 entre abril e julho de 2020. Para a análise dos dados, fez-se o cálculo do risco relativo com intervalo de confiança de 95% e teste t. Resultados: A amostra totalizou 53 pacientes da UTI diagnosticados com covid-19 e foi composta principalmente pelo sexo feminino (31; 58,49%). Houve predominância do desfecho óbito no grupo de pacientes oncológicos (27; 81,8%), assim como maior número de comorbidades não neoplásicas entre os pacientes oncológicos (19; 57,5%). Além disso, os pacientes oncológicos tiveram maior tempo de suporte ventilatório invasivo, com média de dez dias (13; 39,39%). Conclusão: Houve diferença nas características demográficas e nas intervenções realizadas entre os grupos estudados.

Quality of life of patients with solid malignancies at 3 months after unplanned admission in the intensive care unit: A prospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Although short- and long-term survival in critically ill patients with cancer has been described, data on their quality of life (QoL) after an intensive care unit (ICU) stay are scarce. This study aimed to determine the impact of an ICU stay on QoL assessed at 3 months in patients with solid malignancies.

METHODS

A prospective case-control study was conducted in three French ICUs between February 2020 and February 2021. Adult patients with lung, colorectal, or head and neck cancer who were admitted in the ICU were matched in a 1:2 ratio with patients who were not admitted in the ICU regarding their type of cancer, curative or palliative anticancer treatment, and treatment line. The primary endpoint was the QoL assessed at 3 months from inclusion using the mental and physical components of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The use of anticancer therapies at 3 months was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 23 surviving ICU cancer patients were matched with 46 non-ICU cancer patients. Four patients in the ICU group did not respond to the questionnaire. The mental component score of the SF-36 was higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients: median of 54 (interquartile range: 42-57) vs. 47 (37-52), respectively (p = 0.01). The physical component score of the SF-36 did not differ between groups: 35 (31-47) vs. 42 (34-47) (p = 0.24). In multivariate analysis, no association was found between patient QoL and an ICU stay. A good performance status and a non-metastatic cancer at baseline were independently associated with a higher physical component score. The use of anticancer therapies at 3 months was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with solid malignancies, an ICU stay had no negative impact on QoL at 3 months after discharge when compared with matched non-ICU patients.

C-reactive protein as a non-linear predictor of prolonged length of intensive care unit stay after gastrointestinal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

The relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LoS) has not been well defined.

AIM

To explore the association between CRP levels at ICU admission and prolonged ICU LoS in gastrointestinal cancer (GC) patients after major surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to quantify serum CRP levels and to establish their association with prolonged ICU LoS (≥ 72 h) in GC patients admitted to the ICU. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted, and restricted cubic spline curves with four knots (5%, 35%, 65%, 95%) were used to explore non-linearity assumptions.

RESULTS

A total of 408 patients were enrolled. Among them, 83 (20.3%) patients had an ICU LoS longer than 72 h. CRP levels were independently associated with the risk of prolonged ICU LoS [odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–2.17]. Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between CRP levels and OR for the prolonged ICU LoS (P = 0.035 for non-linearity). After the cut-off of 2.6 (log transformed mg/L), the OR for prolonged ICU LoS significantly increased with CRP levels. The adjusted regression coefficient was 0.70 (95%CI 0.31–1.57, P = 0.384) for CRP levels less than 2.6, whereas it was 2.43 (95%CI 1.39–4.24, P = 0.002) for CRP levels higher than 2.6.

CONCLUSION

Among the GC patients, CRP levels at ICU admission were non-linearly associated with prolonged ICU LoS in survivors. An admission CRP level > 2.6 (log transformed mg/L) was associated with increased risk of prolonged ICU LoS.

Prognostic Impact of Neutropenia in Cancer Patients with Septic Shock: A 2009–2017 Nationwide Cohort Study

Simple Summary

The prognostic impact of neutropenia on mortality in cancer patients with septic shock remains controversial despite recent advances in cancer and sepsis management. This study aimed to determine whether neutropenia could be related to an increase in short-term and long-term mortality. This population-based, case–control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Adult cancer patients who presented to the emergency department with septic shock from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated as short-term and long-term outcomes. After adjustment for confounders, neutropenia was independently associated with decreased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. Neutropenia did not increase mortality in cancer patients with septic shock, suggesting that neutropenia may not be used as a single triage criterion for withholding intensive care in cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock.

Abstract

(1) Background: Neutropenia’s prognostic impact on mortality in cancer patients with septic shock remains controversial despite recent advances in cancer and sepsis management. This population-based, case–control study aimed to determine whether neutropenia could be related to an increase in short-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: This population-based, case–control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Adult cancer patients who presented to the emergency department with septic shock from 2009 to 2017 were included. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated as short-term and long-term outcomes. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and neutropenia. (3) Results: In 43,466 adult cancer patients with septic shock, the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 52.1% and 81.3%, respectively. In total, 6391 patients had neutropenic septic shock, and the prevalent cancer type was lung cancer, followed by leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, stomach cancer, and colon cancer. Furthermore, 30-day and 1-year mortality was lower in patients with neutropenia than in those without neutropenia. After adjustment for confounders, neutropenia was independently associated with decreased 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. (4) Conclusions: In cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock, the presence of neutropenia did not increase mortality. This suggests that neutropenia may not be used as a single triage criterion for withholding intensive care in cancer patients presenting to the emergency department with septic shock.

Prediction and Analysis of Length of Stay Based on Nonlinear Weighted XGBoost Algorithm in Hospital

An improved nonlinear weighted extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) technique is developed to forecast length of stay for patients with imbalance data. The algorithm first chooses an effective technique for fitting the duration of stay and determining the distribution law and then optimizes the negative log likelihood loss function using a heuristic nonlinear weighting method based on sample percentage. Theoretical and practical results reveal that, when compared to existing algorithms, the XGBoost method based on nonlinear weighting may achieve higher classification accuracy and better prediction performance, which is beneficial in treating more patients with fewer hospital beds.

Effect of the underlying malignancy on critically ill septic patient's outcome

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is an important cause of mortality and morbidity among critically ill patients with underlying malignancy.

METHODS

Patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital from January 1, 2010 to April 30, 2019 were recruited. Demographics, laboratory parameter, and outcome were analyzed. Those with underlying malignancy were matched with those without malignancy based on their severity of organ failure (defined by the sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score) and septic source.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-three patients with underlying active malignancy were matched with 259 patients without malignancy. Those with malignancy had higher APACHE IV score (89 vs. 83), lower albumin (22.1 vs. 24.4), neutrophil count (6.0 vs. 9.3), hemoglobin (8.0 vs. 9.8), platelet count (113 vs. 133), less use of mechanical ventilation (35.7% vs. 45.9%), renal replacement therapy (22.1% vs. 28.2%) and vasopressor (66.2% vs. 74.9%), higher 30-day (34.2% vs. 24.3%) ICU (22.4% vs. 18.9%), and 1-year (62.4% vs. 36.7%) mortality compared with those without malignancy. A higher APACHE IV score and pulmonary sepsis were predictors of 30-day mortality by Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Disease severity and pulmonary sepsis, but not underlying malignancy, predicted short-term mortality among critically ill septic patients.

Critically ill cancer patient's resuscitation: a Belgian/French societies' consensus conference

To respond to the legitimate questions raised by the application of invasive methods of monitoring and life-support techniques in cancer patients admitted in the ICU, the European Lung Cancer Working Party and the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique, set up a consensus conference. The methodology involved a systematic literature review, experts' opinion and a final consensus conference about nine predefined questions1. Which triage criteria, in terms of complications and considering the underlying neoplastic disease and possible therapeutic limitations, should be used to guide admission of cancer patient to intensive care units?2. Which ventilatory support [High Flow Oxygenation, Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV), Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV), Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)] should be used, for which complications and in which environment?3. Which support should be used for extra-renal purification, in which conditions and environment?4. Which haemodynamic support should be used, for which complications, and in which environment?5. Which benefit of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cancer patients and for which complications?6. Which intensive monitoring in the context of oncologic treatment (surgery, anti-cancer treatment …)?7. What specific considerations should be taken into account in the intensive care unit?8. Based on which criteria, in terms of benefit and complications and taking into account the neoplastic disease, patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (or equivalent) should receive cellular elements derived from the blood (red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets)?9. Which training is required for critical care doctors in charge of cancer patients?

Critical illness in patients with metastatic cancer: a population-based cohort study of epidemiology and outcomes

The appropriateness of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of patients with metastatic cancer remains debated. We aimed to examine the short-term outcomes and their temporal pattern in critically ill patients with metastatic disease. We used state-wide data to identify hospitalizations aged ≥18 years with metastatic cancer admitted to ICU in Texas during 2010-2014. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the factors associated with short-term mortality and its temporal trends among all ICU admissions and those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Among 136,644 ICU admissions with metastatic cancer, 50.8% were aged ≥65 years, with one or more organ failures present in 53.3% and mechanical ventilation was used in 11.1%. The crude short-term mortality among all ICU admissions and those mechanically ventilated was 28.1% and 62.0%, respectively. Discharge to home occurred in 57.1% of all ICU admissions. On adjusted analyses, short-term mortality increased with rising number of organ failures (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.399, 95% CI 1.374 to 1.425), while being lower with chemotherapy (aOR 0.467, 95% CI 0.432 to 0.506) and radiation therapy (aOR 0.832, 95% CI 0.749 to 0.924), and decreased over time (aOR 0.934 per year, 95% CI 0.924 to 0.945). Predictors of short-term mortality were largely similar among those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Most ICU admissions with metastatic cancer survived hospitalization, although short-term mortality was very high among those undergoing mechanical ventilation. Short-term mortality decreased over time and was lower among those receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These findings support consideration of critical care in patients with metastatic cancer, but underscore the need to address patient-centered goals of care ahead of ICU admission.

Extended intensive care correlates with worsening of surgical outcome after elective abdominal aortic reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of extended postoperative intensive care on short- and long-term patient outcome after elective abdominal aortic surgery and to assess the risk factors for patient survival after extended intensive care unit (ICU) treatment.

METHODS

The data of 231 patients that underwent open or endovascular abdominal aortic surgery were retrospectively analysed with regard to extended postoperative intensive care, defined as ICU treatment for more than 24 consecutive hours. Pre- and intraoperative factors were evaluated. The endpoints of the study were postoperative complications, mortality, and long-term follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of worse overall survival.

RESULTS

Extended postoperative intensive care was needed in 84 patients (63 after open and 21 after endovascular surgery). The period of ICU treatment was similar in both groups. Only the wound complications (31.8% vs. 9.5%, p=.0498; OR 4.42 (0.94-20.84)) and the rate of acute kidney injury (82.5% vs. 57.1%, p=.0352; OR 3.55 (1.20-0.46)) were more frequent after open surgery, whereas brief reactive psychosis (38.1% vs. 14.3%, p=.0281; OR 0.27 (0.09- 0.84)) was more frequent after endovascular surgery. ICU stay of ≥8 days correlated with significantly lower survival rates compared to a shorter ICU stay (p=.0034), independent of open or endovascular techniques. Other multivariate risk factors for worse survival were the absence of preoperative aspirin medication, a body mass index (BMI) of <25, chronic renal insufficiency (CRI), and coronary artery disease (CAD). Endovascular therapy was a positive predictive factor of short ICU stay of ≤3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome after extended intensive care following elective aortic surgery is strongly dependent on the length of ICU stay.

Outcomes after long-term mechanical ventilation of cancer patients

Background

The probability of weaning and of long-term survival of chronically mechanically ventilated cancer patients is unknown, with incomplete information available to guide therapeutic decisions. We sought to determine the probability of weaning and overall survival of cancer patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation in a specialized weaning unit.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review of patients requiring mechanical ventilation outside of a critical care setting from 2008 to 2012 and from January 1 to December 31, 2018, was performed. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, including cancer specifics, comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes. Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Time to weaning was analyzed using the cumulative incidence function, with death considered a competing risk. Prognostic factors were evaluated for use in prospective evaluations of weaning protocols.

Results

Between 2008 and 2012, 122 patients required mechanical ventilation outside of a critical care setting with weaning as a goal of care. The cumulative incidence of weaning after discharge from the intensive care unit was 42% at 21 days, 49% at 30 days, 58% at 60 days, 61% at 90 days, and 61% at 120 days. The median survival was 0.16 years (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.33) for those not weaned and 1.05 years (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.34) for those weaned. Overall survival at 1 year and 2 years was 52 and 32% among those weaned and 16 and 9% among those not weaned. During 2018, 36 patients at our institution required mechanical ventilation outside of a critical care setting, with weaning as a goal of care. Overall, with a median follow-up of 140 days (range, 0–425 days; average, 141 days), 25% of patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation (9 of 36) are alive.

Conclusions

Cancer patients can be weaned from long-term mechanical ventilation, even after prolonged periods of support. Implementation of a resource-intensive weaning program did not improve rates of successful weaning. No clear time on mechanical ventilation could be identified beyond which weaning was unprecedented. Short-term overall survival for these patients is poor.

[Cancer patients in operative intensive care medicine]

Die Prävalenz onkologischer Erkrankungen ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten stetig angestiegen. Durch neue Therapieoptionen können immer mehr Patienten mit einem kurativen Therapieansatz behandelt werden. Diese individualisierten und teilweise sehr aggressiven Therapien können jedoch auch zu schweren Nebenwirkungen führen. Diese sollten als wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen zu anderen vitalbedrohlichen Krankheitsbildern auch dem im OP und als Intensivmediziner tätigen Anästhesisten bekannt sein. Krebspatienten werden häufig auf operativen Intensivstationen aufgenommen, um Komplikationen der malignen Grunderkrankung oder auch Nebenwirkungen einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie zu behandeln. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die maligne Grunderkrankung entgegen bisheriger Annahme keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Intensivüberleben hat. Bei der Aufnahme eines onkologischen Patienten sollte daher die akut vorliegende Organdysfunktion zunächst im Vordergrund stehen. Bei der Therapiezielplanung gilt es, nicht zu übersehen, wann ein kuratives in ein palliatives Konzept übergehen muss. Hierfür müssen neue Aufnahmestrategien und -kriterien entwickelt und evaluiert werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden Diagnosen und Therapien häufiger intensivmedizinischer Krankheitsbilder von onkologischen Patienten sowie Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapien dargelegt und Aufnahmestrategien für Patienten mit malignen Erkrankungen vorgestellt.

Would you like to be admitted to the ICU? The preferences of intensivists and general public according to different outcomes

BACKGROUND

Discussions about invasiveness of care (advanced directives) and end-of-life issues have become frequent among intensivists and patients. Nevertheless, there are considerable divergences in the attitudes between intensivists and patients toward end-of-life care in the intensive care units (ICU).

METHODS

The goal was to compare the preferences between intensivists and general public regarding ICU admission of a hypothetical patient with six different clinical outcomes. For that, intensivists and the general public (university graduate professionals outside the area of health) were invited to participate in this study. A survey was conducted with a hypothetical patient with six different clinical outcomes ranging from ICU discharge without any neurological sequelae, nor dependence for daily activities, to death. The WHOQOL-BREF was applied. Comparisons were made between the answers provided by intensivists regarding what they would choose for themselves and their patients, and the preferences of general public.

RESULTS

Between July 2013 and July 2016, 300 participants in 5 hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil were invited to participate in this study, of whom 257 (85.7%) responded the survey. Eighty-two intensivists responded what they would choose for themselves, 81 intensivists responded what they would choose for their patients, and 94 people from general public responded what they would choose for themselves. Quality of life did not differ among the groups. In all scenarios, except when the outcome was severe disability or death, intensivists were more likely to choose ICU admission for their patients than for themselves (p < .05 for all). Compared with general public, intensivists were more likely to choose ICU admission for themselves only when the best clinical scenario outcome is considered (p < .001). General public was significantly less prone to choosing ICU admission than intensivists when choosing for their patients, in three out of six scenarios (p < .001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable divergences exist between intensivists' and patients' preferences toward end-of-life care. Advanced care planning and effective ongoing communication among intensivists, patients and relatives are essential to improve end-of-life decisions and the quality of care.

Changes in critically ill cancer patients' short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data

PURPOSE

The number of averted deaths due to therapeutic advances in oncology and hematology is substantial and increasing. Survival of critically ill cancer patients has also improved during the last 2 decades. However, these data stem predominantly from unadjusted analyses. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ICU admission year on short-term survival of critically ill cancer patients, with special attention on those with neutropenia.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual data according to the guidelines of meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology.

DATASOURCE

Pubmed and Cochrane databases.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Adult studies published in English between May 2005 and May 2015.

RESULTS

Overall, 7354 patients were included among whom 1666 presented with neutropenia at ICU admission. Median ICU admission year was 2007 (IQR 2004-2010; range 1994-2012) and median number of admissions per year was 693 (IQR 450-1007). Overall mortality was 47.7%. ICU admission year was associated with a progressive decrease in hospital mortality (OR per year 0.94; 95% CI 0.93-0.95). After adjustment for confounders, year of ICU admission was independently associated with hospital mortality (OR for hospital mortality per year: 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.97). The association was also seen in patients with neutropenia but not in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for patient characteristics, severity of illness and clustering, hospital mortality decreased steadily over time in critically ill oncology and hematology patients except for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

Management of sepsis in neutropenic cancer patients: 2018 guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) and Intensive Care Working Party (iCHOP) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Sepsis and septic shock are major causes of mortality during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia for malignancies requiring urgent treatment. Thus, awareness of the presenting characteristics and prompt management is most important. Improved management of sepsis during neutropenia may reduce the mortality of cancer therapies. However, optimal management may differ between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. The aim of the current guideline is to give evidence-based recommendations for hematologists, oncologists, and intensive care physicians on how to manage adult patients with neutropenia and sepsis.

Influence of neutropenia on mortality of critically ill cancer patients: results of a meta-analysis on individual data

Background

The study objective was to assess the influence of neutropenia on outcome of critically ill cancer patients by meta-analysis of individual data. Secondary objectives were to assess the influence of neutropenia on outcome of critically ill patients in prespecified subgroups (according to underlying tumor, period of admission, need for mechanical ventilation and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)).

Methods

Data sources were PubMed and the Cochrane database. Study selection included articles focusing on critically ill cancer patients published in English and studies in humans from May 2005 to May 2015. For study selection, the study eligibility was assessed by two investigators. Individual data from selected studies were obtained from corresponding authors.

Results

Overall, 114 studies were identified and authors of 30 studies (26.3% of selected studies) agreed to participate in this study. Of the 7515 included patients, three were excluded due to a missing major variable (neutropenia or mortality) leading to analysis of 7512 patients, including 1702 neutropenic patients (22.6%). After adjustment for confounders, and taking study effect into account, neutropenia was independently associated with mortality (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.23–1.62; P = 0.03). When analyzed separately, neither admission period, underlying malignancy nor need for mechanical ventilation modified the prognostic influence of neutropenia on outcome. However, among patients for whom data on G-CSF administration were available (n = 1949; 25.9%), neutropenia was no longer associated with outcome in patients receiving G-CSF (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.70–1.51; P = 0.90).

Conclusion

Among 7512 critically ill cancer patients included in this systematic review, neutropenia was independently associated with poor outcome despite a meaningful survival. Neutropenia was no longer significantly associated with outcome in patients treated by G-CSF, which may suggest a beneficial effect of G-CSF in neutropenic critically ill cancer patients.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42015026347. Date of registration: Sept 18 2015

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2076-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Factors Associated with Mortality in Patients with a Solid Malignancy Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit - A Prospective Observational Study

Purpose

Several studies show conflicting results regarding the prognosis and predictors of the outcome of critically ill patients with a solid malignancy. This study aims to determine the outcome of critically ill patients, admitted to a hospital, with a solid malignancy and the factors associated with the outcomes.

Methods and Materials

All patients with a solid malignancy admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic medical center were enrolled. Clinical data upon admission and during ICU stay were collected. Hospital, ICU, and six months outcomes were documented.

Results

There were 252 patients with a solid malignancy during the study period. Urogenital malignancies were the most common (26.3%) followed by lung cancer (23.5%). Acute respiratory failure was the most common ICU diagnosis (51.6%) followed by sepsis in 46%. ICU mortality and hospital mortality were 21.8% and 34.3%. Six months mortality was 38.4%. Using multivariate analysis, acute kidney injury, OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.50-5.32 and P=0.001, use of mechanical ventilation, OR 2.67 95% CI 1.37 - 5.19 and P=0.004 and performance status of ≥2 with OR of 3.05, 95% CI of 1.5-6.2 and P= 0.002 were associated with hospital mortality. There were no differences in outcome between African American patients (53% of all patients) and other races.

Conclusion

This study reports encouraging survival rates in patients with a solid malignancy who are admitted to ICU. Patients with a poor baseline performance status require mechanical ventilation or develop acute renal failure have worse outcomes.

Outcomes in adult critically ill cancer patients with and without neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Groupe de Recherche en Réanimation Respiratoire du patient d'Onco-Hématologie (GRRR-OH)

PURPOSE

Whether neutropenia has an impact on the mortality of critically ill cancer patients remains controversial, yet it is widely used as an admission criterion and prognostic factor.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies on adult cancer patients and intensive care units were searched on PubMed and Cochrane databases (2005-2015). Summary estimates of mortality risk differences were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among the 1,528 citations identified, 38 studies reporting on 6,054 patients (2,097 neutropenic patients) were included. Median mortality across the studies was 54% [45–64], with unadjusted mortality in neutropenic and non-neutropenic critically ill patients of 60% [53–74] and 47% [41–68], respectively. Overall, neutropenia was associated with a 10% increased mortality risk (6%-14%; I² = 50%). The admission period was not associated with how neutropenia affected mortality. Mortality significantly dropped throughout the study decade [−11% (−13.5 to −8.4)]. This mortality drop was observed in non-neutropenic patients [−12.1% (−15.2 to −9.0)] but not in neutropenic patients [−3.8% (−8.1 to +5.6)].

Sensitivity analyses disclosed no differences in underlying malignancy, mechanical ventilation use, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use. Seven studies allowed the adjustment of severity results (1,350 patients). Although pooled risk difference estimates were similar to non-adjusted results, there was no significant impact of neutropenia on mortality (risk difference of mortality, 9%; 95% CI, −15 to +33)

CONCLUSION

Although the unadjusted mortality of neutropenic patients was 11% higher, this effect disappeared when adjusted for severity. Therefore, when cancer patients become critically ill, neutropenia cannot be considered as a decision-making criterion.

[Cancer patients in operative intensive care medicine]

Die Prävalenz onkologischer Erkrankungen ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten stetig angestiegen. Durch neue Therapieoptionen können immer mehr Patienten mit einem kurativen Therapieansatz behandelt werden. Diese individualisierten und teilweise sehr aggressiven Therapien können jedoch auch zu schweren Nebenwirkungen führen. Diese sollten als wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen zu anderen vitalbedrohlichen Krankheitsbildern auch dem im OP und als Intensivmediziner tätigen Anästhesisten bekannt sein. Krebspatienten werden häufig auf operativen Intensivstationen aufgenommen, um Komplikationen der malignen Grunderkrankung oder auch Nebenwirkungen einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie zu behandeln. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die maligne Grunderkrankung entgegen bisheriger Annahme keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Intensivüberleben hat. Bei der Aufnahme eines onkologischen Patienten sollte daher die akut vorliegende Organdysfunktion zunächst im Vordergrund stehen. Bei der Therapiezielplanung gilt es, nicht zu übersehen, wann ein kuratives in ein palliatives Konzept übergehen muss. Hierfür müssen neue Aufnahmestrategien und -kriterien entwickelt und evaluiert werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden Diagnosen und Therapien häufiger intensivmedizinischer Krankheitsbilder von onkologischen Patienten sowie Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapien dargelegt und Aufnahmestrategien für Patienten mit malignen Erkrankungen vorgestellt.

A systematic review of prognostic factors at the end of life for people with a hematological malignancy

Background

Accurate prognosticating is needed when patients are nearing the end of life to ensure appropriate treatment decisions, and facilitate palliative care provision and transitioning to terminal care. People with a hematological malignancy characteristically experience a fluctuating illness trajectory leading to difficulties with prognosticating. The aim of this review was to identify current knowledge regarding ‘bedside’ prognostic factors in the final 3 months of life for people with a hematological malignancy associated with increased risk of mortality.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed across: PubMed; CINAHL; PsycINFO; and Cochrane with set inclusion criteria: 1) prognostic cohort studies; 2) published 2004–2014; 3) sample ≥ 18 years; 4) >50% sample had a hematological malignancy; 5) reported ‘bedside’ prognostic factors; 6) median survival of <3 months; and 7) English language. Quality appraisal was performed using the Quality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. Results are reported in line with PRISMA guidelines.

Results

The search returned 4860 studies of which 28 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four studies were rated moderate quality, three were high quality and one study was deemed to be of low quality. Most studies were set in the ICU (n = 24/28) and were retrospective (n = 25/28). Forty ‘bedside’ prognostic factors were identified as associated with increased risk of mortality encompassing the following broad categories: 1) demographics; 2) physiological complications or conditions; 3) disease characteristics; 4) laboratory blood values; and 5) interventions.

Conclusions

The literature on prognosticating in the final months of life was predominantly focused on people who had experienced acute physiological deterioration and were being treated aggressively in the in-patient setting. A significant gap in the literature exists for people who are treated less aggressively or are on a palliative trajectory. Findings did not report on, or confirm the significance of, many of the key prognostic factors associated with increased risk of mortality at the end of life in the solid tumour population, demonstrating key differences in the two populations.

Trial registration

This systematic review was not registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3207-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Critical care of patients with cancer

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The increasing prevalence of patients living with cancer in conjunction with the rapid progress in cancer therapy will lead to a growing number of patients with cancer who will require intensive care treatment. Fortunately, the development of more effective oncologic therapies, advances in critical care, and improvements in patient selection have led to an increased survival of critically ill patients with cancer. As a consequence, critical care has become an important cornerstone in the continuum of modern cancer care. Although, in many aspects, critical care for patients with cancer does not differ from intensive care for other seriously ill patients, there are several challenging issues that are unique to this patient population and require special knowledge and skills. The optimal management of critically ill patients with cancer necessitates expertise in oncology, critical care, and palliative medicine. Cancer specialists therefore have to be familiar with key principles of intensive care for critically ill patients with cancer. This review provides an overview of the state-of-the-art in the individualized management of critically ill patients with cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:496-517. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Respiratory Failure in Children With Hemato-oncological Diseases Admitted to the PICU: A Single-center Experience

Respiratory failure (RF) is a main cause of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission in children with hemato-oncological diseases. We present a retrospective chart review of children admitted to our PICU because of RF (January 2006 to December 2010). The aims of this study are the following: (1) to describe the demographical and clinical characteristics and respiratory management of these children; and (2) to identify the factors associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and mortality. A total of 69 patients, encompassing 88 episodes, were included (55/88 cases were hypoxemic RF). The first respiratory support at PICU admission was, in decreasing order of frequency, high-flow oxygen nasal cannula (HFNC; 50/88), noninvasive ventilation (NIV; 13/88), and oxygen nasal cannula (16/88). MV was necessary in 47/88 episodes, 38/47 after another respiratory support. In 18/28 children with initial NIV, MV was required later. MV was associated with O-PRISM score, NIV requirement, suspected respiratory infection, and days of PICU treatment. Patients without MV showed an increased survival rate (P=0.001). In summary, the hypoxemic RF was the main cause of PICU admission, and HFNC or NIV was almost always the first respiratory support. The use of MV was associated with a higher mortality rate. The utility of precocious HFNC or NIV should be investigated in larger clinical studies.

Prognosis-related factors in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hematological malignancies: A retrospective cohort analysis in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the link between patient characteristics and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) in three university-affiliated hospitals in Hunan, China.

METHODS

We conducted a detailed retrospective chart review of 121 sequential intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with HM over a 5-year period. Outcome measures were short- and long-term mortality rates and were correlated with physiologic and therapeutic factors. We also evaluate the performance of two severity-of-illness scoring systems in this population, particularly the value and trend of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA).

RESULTS

The rates for ICU, 1-month and 6-month mortalities were 60.3, 85.9, and 90.9%, respectively. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) was associated with worse outcomes at all time points. Both acute physiology and chronic health evaluation and SOFA scores had positive correlation with ICU mortality. An increase or no change in SOFA over the course of the admission or during the first 48 hours after admission was the most powerful adverse predictor. IMV use and renal dysfunction had a negative effect on the 1-month survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HM have less access to intensive care resources in Hunan, China. The use of IMV, APACHII at admission, and SOFA trend have a strong predictive value in this population. Based on our results, we propose a panel of parameters for use when considering ICU transfer to guide patient management.

Survival in solid cancer patients following intensive care unit admission

PURPOSE

One in seven patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) has a cancer diagnosis but evidence on their expected outcomes after admission has not been synthesised.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of solid cancer adult patients admitted to ICU from 2000 onwards using EMBASE and MEDLINE electronic databases.

RESULTS

There were 48 papers identified that reported survival in ICU patients with solid cancers. ICU mortality was reported in 35 studies comprising a total sample of 25,339 patients and ranging from 4.5 to 85 %. The average mortality of the distribution of reported mortality rates within ICU was 31.2 % (95 % CI 24.0-39.0 %). Hospital mortality was reported in 31 studies across a total sample of 74,061 patients. The average hospital mortality was 38.2 % (33.8-42.7 %) and ranged from 4.6 to 76.8 %. Poorer physiological score, invasive mechanical ventilation and poor functional status were associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors have been associated with poor survival in ICU cancer patients; however, primary research is still needed to describe outcomes in cancer patients with sufficient case mix and treatment details to be of prognostic value to clinicians.

Survival of hematological patients after discharge from the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study

Introduction

Although the survival rates of hematological patients admitted to the ICU are improving, little is known about the long-term outcome. Our objective was to identify factors related to long-term outcome in hematological patients after ICU discharge.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was carried out in seven centers in Spain. From an initial sample of 161 hematological patients admitted to one of the participating ICUs during the study period, 62 were discharged alive and followed for a median time of 23 (1 to 54) months. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the factors related to long term-survival. Finally, variables that influence the continuation of the scheduled therapy for the hematological disease were studied.

Results

Mortality after ICU discharge was 61%, with a median survival of 18 (1 to 54) months. In the multivariate analysis, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (ECOG) >2 at ICU discharge (Hazard ratio 11.15 (4.626 to 26.872)), relapse of the hematological disease (Hazard ratio 9.738 (3.804 to 24.93)) and discontinuation of the planned treatment for the hematological disease (Hazard ratio 4.349 (1.286 to 14.705)) were independently related to mortality. Absence of stem cell transplantation, high ECOG and high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores decreased the probability of receiving the planned therapy for the hematological malignancy.

Conclusions

Both ICU care and post-ICU management determine the long-term outcome of hematological patients who are discharged alive from the ICU.

The prognosis of patients with lung cancer admitted to the medical intensive care unit

AIMS

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Despite their poor prognosis, patients with lung cancer are increasingly being admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) for treatment of critical illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with lung cancer who are admitted to an MICU and to identify the measurable predictors of their MICU outcome.

METHODS

We conducted retrospective analysis on 97 patients with lung cancer admitted to the MICU between 2007 and 2011.

RESULTS

The mean age ± standard deviation was 71.8 ± 6.8 years. Of the 97 patients (82 male), 73 patients (75%) had non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIB, IV and 24 patients (25%) had small cell lung cancer. The intensive care unit mortality and in-hospital mortality rates were 53.6 and 61.8%. The main reasons for MICU admission were pneumonia (n = 51) and complication of cancer management (n = 45). The predictors of poor MICU outcome were history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.028), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P = 0.018), need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.014), use of vasoactive agents (P < 0.0001), the presence of acute renal failure (P < 0.0001) and presence of multiorgan failure (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that in-hospital mortality was not influenced by age, sex or performance status score of patients with lung cancer but increased with the severity of organ failure at MICU admission.

Is prolonged mechanical ventilation of cancer patients futile?

The issue of limiting life-sustaining treatments for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is complex. The ethical principles applied by ICU staff when making treatment-limitation decisions must comply with the law of their country. Until 2011, the law in Taiwan prohibited the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Consequently, patients with severe underlying diseases could receive prolonged mechanical ventilation. In a study conducted by Shih and colleagues in patients with cancer in Taiwan, continuous mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days was associated with poor outcomes, particularly in the subgroups of patients with metastases, lung cancer, or liver cancer. These results highlight the need for appropriate legislation regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in patients, especially those for whom no effective cancer treatments are available.

Incidence, life expectancy and prognostic factors in cancer patients under prolonged mechanical ventilation: a nationwide analysis of 5,138 cases during 1998-2007

INTRODUCTION

This study is aimed at determining the incidence, survival rate, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) and prognostic factors in patients with cancer in different organ systems undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV).

METHODS

We used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 1998 to 2007 and linked it with the National Mortality Registry to ascertain mortality. Subjects who received PMV, defined as having undergone mechanical ventilation continuously for longer than 21 days, were enrolled. The incidence of cancer patients requiring PMV was calculated, with the exception of patients with multiple cancers. The life expectancies and QALE of patients with different types of cancer were estimated. Quality-of-life data were taken from a sample of 142 patients who received PMV. A multivariable proportional hazards model was constructed to assess the effect of different prognostic factors, including age, gender, type of cancer, metastasis, comorbidities and hospital levels.

RESULTS

Among 9,011 cancer patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days, 5,138 undergoing PMV had a median survival of 1.37 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0.50 to 4.57) and a 1-yr survival rate of 14.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3% to 15.3%). The incidence of PMV was 10.4 per 100 ICU admissions. Head and neck cancer patients seemed to survive the longest. The overall life expectancy was 1.21 years, with estimated QALE ranging from 0.17 to 0.37 quality-adjusted life years for patients with poor and partial cognition, respectively. Cancer of liver (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.78), lung (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.41) and metastasis (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.65) were found to predict shorter survival independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients requiring PMV had poor long-term outcomes. Palliative care should be considered early in these patients, especially when metastasis has occurred.

Retrospective analysis of outcome of women with breast or gynaecological cancer in the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

Advances in oncological care have led to improved short and long-term outcomes of female patients with breast and gynecological cancer but little is known about their prognosis when admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to describe the epidemiology of patients with women's cancer in ICU.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data of patients with breast and gynecological cancer in ICU between February 2004 and July 2008.

SETTING

ICU in a tertiary referral centre in London.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen critically ill women with breast or gynaecological cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ICU and six-month outcome.

RESULTS

Eleven women had breast cancer and eight patients had gynaecological cancer. Twelve patients were known to have metastatic disease. The main reasons for admission to ICU were sepsis (94.7%), respiratory failure (36.8%) and need for vasoactive support (26.3%). ICU mortality was 31.6%. There was no difference in age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on admission to ICU between ICU survivors and non-survivors. During their stay in ICU, non-survivors had significantly more organ failure. Six-month mortality was 68.4%. Four patients had >1 admission to ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU outcome of critically ill women with breast or gynaecological cancer was similar to that of other non-cancer patient cohorts but six-month mortality was significantly higher. The decision to admit patients with women's cancer to the ICU should depend on the severity of the acute illness rather than factors related to the underlying malignancy. More research is needed to explore the outcome of patients with women's cancer after discharge from ICU.

Long-term outcomes and quality of life in critically ill patients with hematological or solid malignancies: a single center study

PURPOSE

Data concerning long-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in critically ill cancer patients are scarce. The aims of this study were to assess long-term outcomes and QOL in critically ill patients with hematological (HM) or solid malignancies (SM) 3 months and 1 year after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, to compare these with QOL before ICU admission, and to identify prognostic indicators of long-term QOL.

METHODS

During a 1 year prospective observational cohort analysis, consecutive patients with HM or SM admitted to the medical or surgical ICU of a university hospital were screened for inclusion. Cancer data, demographics, co-morbidity, severity of illness, organ failures, and outcomes were collected. The QOL before ICU admission, 3 months, and 1 year after ICU discharge was assessed using standardized questionnaires (EuroQoL-5D, Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey). Statistical significance was attained at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 483 patients (85 HM, 398 SM) (64% men) with a median age of 62 years included. Mortality rates of HM compared to SM were, respectively: hospital (34 vs. 13%), 3 months (42 vs. 17%), and 1 year (66 vs. 36%) (P < 0.001). QOL declined at 3 months, but improved at 1 year although it remained under baseline QOL, particularly in HM. Older age (P = 0.007), severe comorbidity (P = 0.035), and HM (P = 0.041) were independently associated with poorer QOL at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes and QOL were poor, particularly in HM. Long-term expectations should play a larger role during multidisciplinary triage decisions upon referral to the ICU.

Palliative care and hematologic oncology: the promise of collaboration

Palliative medicine provides active evaluation and treatment of the physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs of patients and families with serious illnesses, regardless of curability or stage of illness. The hematologic malignancies comprise diverse clinical presentations, evolutions, treatment strategies and clinical and quality of life outcomes with dual potential for rapid clinical decline and ultimate improvement. While recent medical advances have led to cure, remission or long-term disease control for patients with hematologic malignancy, many still portend poor prognoses and all are associated with significant symptom and quality of life burden for patients and families. The gravity of a diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy also weighs heavily on the medical team, who typically develop close and long-term relationships with their patients. Palliative care teams provide an additional layer of support to patients, family caregivers, and the primary medical team through close attention to symptoms and emotional, practical, and spiritual needs. Barriers to routine palliative care co-management in hematologic malignancies include persistent health professional confusion about the role of palliative care and its distinction from hospice; inadequate availability of palliative care provider capacity; and widespread lack of physician training in communicating about achievable goals of care with patients, family caregivers, and colleagues. We herein review the evidence of need for palliative care services in hematologic malignancy patients in the context of a growing body of evidence demonstrating the beneficial outcomes of such care when provided simultaneously with curative or life-prolonging treatment.

Outcome in patients with long-term treatment in a surgical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with abdominal, thoracic or vascular operations and long-term intensive care unit (ICU) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present retrospective observational cohort study was performed at the authors' surgical ICU at the Marburg University Medical Centre. All patients who stayed at the ICU longer than 48 h and underwent visceral, thoracic or vascular surgery between January 2005 and December 2006 were retrospectively analysed. Patients with an ICU stay of 20 or more days were defined as the long-term study group. Clinical variables were tested for prognostic value.

RESULTS

In 2 years, 852 patients were treated at the intensive care unit. Follow-up was available in 502 patients, with 219 patients treated for two and more days and a median of 16.4 days. Sixty-seven long-term patients were compared to 152 (69.4 %) patients treated between 2 and 20 days. Overall survival after 12 months was 50.2 % (110/219), while 65.8 % (144/219) were discharged from ICU. Older age, longer treatment at the ICU and increased simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) at admission were associated with decreased 12-month survival, while no statistical differences were observed for the underlying and malignant disease by univariate analysis. The risk of death was 29, 56 and 61 % for patients treated 2-4, 5-19 and ≥20 days at the ICU. Decreased survival of patients treated for 5-19 and ≥20 days were confirmed by logrank test (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with long-term ICU stay showed decreased survival than patients who are treated less than 5 days but similar survival as patients which stayed between 5 and 19 days. Malignant disease is not associated with an unfavourable 12-month survival while older age, higher SAPS index at discharge and longer stay at ICU are. Long-term ICU survivors have no increased risk to succumb after discharge from ICU.

The impact of comorbid [corrected] conditions on critical illness

OBJECTIVE

To review the current knowledge of common comorbidities in the intensive care unit, including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, HIV infection, and obesity, with specific attention to epidemiology, contribution to diseases and outcomes, and the impact on treatments in these patients.

DATA SOURCE

Review of the relevant medical literature for specific common comorbidities in the critically ill.

RESULTS

Critically ill patients are admitted to the intensive care unit for various reasons, and often the admission diagnosis is accompanied by a chronic comorbidity. Chronic comorbid conditions commonly seen in critically ill patients may influence the decision to provide intensive care unit care, decisions regarding types and intensity of intensive care unit treatment options, and outcomes. The presence of comorbid conditions may predispose patients to specific complications or forms of organ dysfunction. The impact of specific comorbidities varies among critically ill medical, surgical, and other populations, and outcomes associated with certain comorbidities have changed over time. Specifically, outcomes for patients with cancer and HIV have improved, likely related to advances in therapy. Overall, the negative impact of chronic comorbidity on survival in critical illness may be primarily influenced by the degree of organ dysfunction or the cumulative severity of multiple comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Chronic comorbid conditions are common in critically ill patients. Both the acute illness and the chronic conditions influence prognosis and optimal care delivery for these patients, particularly for adverse outcomes and complications influenced by comorbidities. Further work is needed to fully determine the individual and combined impact of chronic comorbidities on intensive care unit outcomes.

Survival of patients with hematological malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit: prognostic factors and outcome compared to unselected medical intensive care unit admissions, a parallel group study

Improved survival in patients with hematological malignancy (HM) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) has largely been reported in uncontrolled cohorts from single academic institutions. We compared hospital mortality between 147 patients with HM and 147 general medical admissions to five non-specialist ICUs. The proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge was significantly worse in patients with HM (27% vs. 56%; p < 0.001). Six-month and 1-year survival in patients with HM was 21% and 18%, respectively. HM, greater age, mechanical ventilation (MV) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score were independent predictors of poor outcome. For patients with HM, culture proven infection, age, MV and inotropes were negative predictors. Disease-specific factors including hematological diagnosis, neutropenia, remission status, prior stem cell transplant, time from diagnosis to admission and degree of prior treatment were not predictive. Overall survival of patients with HM was worse than that recently reported from specialist units.

C-reactive protein in critically ill cancer patients with sepsis: influence of neutropenia

INTRODUCTION

Several biomarkers have been studied in febrile neutropenia. Our aim was to assess C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration in septic critically ill cancer patients and to compare those with and without neutropenia.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a matched case-control study conducted at an oncologic medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) was performed, segregating patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. The impact of neutropenia on CRP concentrations at admission and during the first week of ICU stay was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 154 critically ill septic cancer patients, 86 with neutropenia and 68 without, were included in the present study. At ICU admission, the CRP concentration of neutropenic patients was significantly higher than in non-neutropenic patients, 25.9 ± 11.2 mg/dL vs. 19.7 ± 11.4 mg/dL (P = 0.009). Among neutropenic patients, CRP concentrations at ICU admission were not influenced by the severity of neutropenia (< 100/mm3 vs. ≥ 100/mm3 neutrophils), 25.1 ± 11.6 mg/dL vs. 26.9 ± 10.9 mg/dL (P = 0.527). Time dependent analysis of CRP from Day 1 to Day 7 of antibiotic therapy showed an almost parallel decrease in both groups (P = 0.335), though CRP of neutropenic patients was, on average, always higher in comparison to that of non-neutropenic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In septic critically ill cancer patients CRP concentrations are more elevated in those with neutropenia. However, the CRP course seems to be independent from the presence or absence of neutropenia.

Admission of advanced lung cancer patients to intensive care unit: a retrospective study of 76 patients

BACKGROUND

Criteria for admitting patients with incurable diseases to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) remain unclear and have ethical implications.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated MICU outcomes and identified risk factors for MICU mortality in consecutive patients with advanced lung cancer admitted to two university-hospital MICUs in France between 1996 and 2006.

RESULTS

Of 76 included patients, 49 had non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB n = 20; stage IV n = 29). In 60 patients, MICU admission was directly related to the lung cancer (complication of cancer management, n = 30; cancer progression, n = 14; and lung-cancer-induced diseases, n = 17). Mechanical ventilation was required during the MICU stay in 57 patients. Thirty-six (47.4%) patients died in the MICU. Three factors were independently associated with MICU mortality: use of vasoactive agents (odds ratio [OR] 6.81 95% confidence interval [95%CI] [1.77-26.26], p = 0.005), mechanical ventilation (OR 6.61 95%CI [1.44-30.5], p = 0.015) and thrombocytopenia (OR 5.13; 95%CI [1.17-22.5], p = 0.030). In contrast, mortality was lower in patients admitted for a complication of cancer management (OR 0.206; 95%CI [0.058-0.738], p = 0.015). Of the 27 patients who returned home, four received specific lung cancer treatment after the MICU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute complications of treatment for advanced lung cancer may benefit from MCIU admission. Further studies are necessary to assess outcomes such as quality of life after MICU discharge.

The Outcomes of Adult Patients with Haematological Malignancy Requiring Admission to the Intensive Care Unit

A literature review was conducted to ascertain the prognosis of patients with haematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify any factors that could be shown to influence outcome. Studies that examined outcomes among patients with haematological malignancy admitted to ICU were evaluated. Pooled outcome data relating to ICU, hospital and six-month mortality were compiled. A qualitative assessment of the evidence relating to putative determinants of prognosis was made. Observational studies examining outcomes among over 10,000 haematological malignancy patients admitted to the ICU were identified. Approximately 40% of such patients survived until hospital discharge. The principle determinants of short-term survival would appear to be related to the severity of the acute illness and the consequent physiological derangement or organ system dysfunction. In the longer term, factors relating to the prognosis of the underlying malignancy appear to be important.

ICU and 6-month outcome of oncology patients in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Advances in oncological care have led to improved short- and long-term prognosis of cancer patients but admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial.

AIM

The objective was to assess the outcome of patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours admitted to the ICU as emergencies, and to identify risk factors for mortality.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective and prospective analysis of 185 cancer patients admitted to the ICU at Guy's Hospital (259 admissions), a large tertiary referral oncology centre between February 2004 and July 2008.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen patients had haematological malignancies of whom 30.4% died in ICU. Seventy patients had solid tumours. ICU mortality was 27.1%. Fifty-four patients had >1 admission to ICU. ICU survivors had significantly lower acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and less failed organ systems on admission to ICU and less organ failure during stay in the ICU. Neutropenia, sepsis and re-admission were not associated with an increased mortality. Six-month mortality rates for patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours were 73 and 78.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Short-term outcome of critically ill cancer patients in ICU is better than previously reported. The decision to admit cancer patients to ICU should depend on the severity of the acute illness rather than factors related to the malignancy. In appropriate patients, invasive organ support and re-admission should not be withheld.