Optimizing Care Across the Continuum for Older Adults with Lung Cancer: A Review

Older adults with lung cancer experience inferior clinical outcomes compared to their younger counterparts. This review provides the scaffolding to address these disparities by delineating (1) the distinct and varied care needs of older adults with lung malignancies, (2) evidence-based measures for identifying subgroups within this population meriting tailored approaches to care, (3) age-specific considerations for the selection of cancer-directed therapy, and (4) opportunities for future work to enhance clinical outcomes and care delivery.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients aged ≥65 years with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to discern the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in older adults with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and establish a prognostic nomogram for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients (aged ≥65 years) with clinically-confirmed stage I-II NSCLC treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2020 were enrolled in the study. Primary end points included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), cumulative incidences of local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant failure (DF), and toxicity. A nomogram for OS was developed and validated internally using one thousand bootstrap resamplings.

RESULTS

The median times to LF, RF, and DF were 22.1 months, 26.9 months and 24.1 months, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates from the start of SBRT were 79.4 %, 53.1 %, and 38.9 %, respectively. Performance status, pre-SBRT platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and planning tumor volume (PTV) were predictive of PFS. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates from the start of SBRT were 90.8 %, 67.9 % and 47.6 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, good performance status, a low level of pre-SBRT PLR, and small tumor size were associated with better prognosis, all of which were included in the nomogram. The model showed optimal discrimination, with a C-index of 0.651 and good calibration. The most common adverse reactions were grade 1-2, such as anemia, cough, and fatigue.

DISCUSSION

SBRT is a reasonable treatment modality for early-stage NSCLC in older adults. It achieved good survival outcomes and low toxicity. The proposed nomogram may be able to estimate individual outcomes for these patients.

Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a matched-pair study

BACKGROUND

Reports from case series suggest that operative outcomes are comparable amongst different age groups following surgery with curative intent for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to compare morbidity and mortality after NSCLC surgery in older patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) and identify independent predictive risk factors.

METHODS

We identified 2015 patients with postoperative stages IA to IIIA according to AJCC/UICC 7th edition who had undergone NSCLC surgery with curative intent at a single specialized lung cancer center from January 2010 to December 2015. A matched-pair analysis was performed on 227 older patients and corresponding 227 younger patients. Short-term surgical outcomes were postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality. Long-term operative outcomes were disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

454 patients were included in the matched-pair analysis. 36% of younger patients developed postoperative complications versus 42% in older patients (p = 0.163). Age was not significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days in older patients and 13 days in younger patients (p = 0.185). 90-day mortality was 2.2% in younger patients compared to 4% in older patients (p = 0.424). In patients aged 75 and older impaired performance status (ECOG ≥ 1) was associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 2.15, CI 1.34-3.46), as were preoperative serum C-reactive protein / albumin ratio ≥ 0.3 (HR = 1.95, CI 1.23-3.11) and elevated preoperative serum creatinine levels ≥ 1.1 mg/dl (HR = 1.84, CI 1.15-2.95). In the younger cohort male sex (HR = 2.26, CI 1.17-4.36), postoperative stage III disease (HR 4.61, CI 2.23-9.54) and preoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl) (HR 2.09, CI 1.10-3.96) were associated with decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung resection for NSCLC in older patients is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality comparable to those of younger patients. In older patients, physical activity, comorbidities and nutritional status are related to survival and should influence the indication for surgery rather than age alone.

Microwave Ablation for Inoperable Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Aged ≥70 Years: A Prospective, Single-Center Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and survival outcomes of computed tomography-guided microwave ablation (MWA) for medically inoperable Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients aged ≥70 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical trial. The MWA clinical trial enrolled patients aged ≥70 years with medically inoperable Stage I NSCLC from January 2021 to October 2021. All patients received biopsy and MWA synchronously with the coaxial technique. The primary endpoints were 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled. Ninety-seven patients were eligible and analyzed. The median age was 75 years (range, 70-91 years). The median diameter of tumors was 16 mm (range, 6-33 mm). Adenocarcinoma (87.6%) was the most common histologic finding. With a median follow-up of 16.0 months, the 1-year OS and PFS rates were 99.0% and 93.7%, respectively. There were no procedure-related deaths in any patient within 30 days after MWA. Most of the adverse events were minor.

CONCLUSION

MWA is an effective and safe treatment for patients aged ≥70 years with medically inoperable Stage I NSCLC.

Postoperative chemotherapy significantly improves survival of elderly patients with stage IB-II non-small cell lung cancer: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

There is scant evidence-based information about survival benefits of postoperative chemotherapy in elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study is to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of surgery alone versus postoperative chemotherapy in patients aged ≥70 years with stage I-II NSCLC.

METHODS

Elderly patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with stage I-II NSCLC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. OS and CSS were compared between the two groups utilizing overlap weighting analysis, inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Of the 7193 included patients with stage I-II NSCLC who are more than 70 years old, 681 patients (9.5%) received postoperative chemotherapy and 6512 patients (90.5%) received surgery-alone. Median OS was 77 months in postoperative chemotherapy group versus 79 months in surgery-alone group (p = 0.89). The result of IPTW analysis showed the similar results. The probability of patients choosing chemotherapy increased with the AJCC stage and Grade increasing (p < 0.001) and decreased with the growth of age (p < 0.001). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the survival rate of stage IA patients decreased significantly after postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.01) while the survival rate of stage IB-II patients increased significantly (p < 0.01). At the same time, we found that patients in the postoperative chemotherapy group tended to have better OS than those in the surgery-alone group with the grade and tumor size increasing.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that postoperative chemotherapy could significantly improve the survival of stage IB-II NSCLC patients aged ≥70 years, and decrease the survival of stage IA patients.

Impact of segmentectomy and lobectomy on non-lung cancer death in early-stage lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse the risk of death from non-lung cancer after segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1385 patients underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for clinical stage 0-I primary lung cancer, with no evidence of recurrence after surgery, between January 2008 and December 2018. Risk factors for non-lung cancer deaths (NLCD) were analysed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The overall survival (OS) of patients with low and high comorbidities who underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy was compared using a log-rank test.

RESULTS

Patients with NLCD (n = 126) were more likely to have undergone lobectomy than patients with non-recurrence survival (n = 1259). Multivariable analysis revealed that age (≥65 years), smoking index (≥600), body mass index (≤18.5 kg/m2), interstitial pneumonia, values for percentage of predicted vital capacity (≤9.4%) and lobectomy were risk factors for NLCD. Patients who underwent segmentectomy had significantly better 5-year OS than those who underwent lobectomy, after propensity score matching (94.6% vs 90.4%, P = 0.027). Patients with high comorbidities (patients with ≥2 of the following risks: age ≥65 years, smoking index ≥600, body mass index ≤18.5 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1, values for percentage of predicted vital capacity ≤96.4%) who underwent segmentectomy had a better 5-year OS than those who underwent lobectomy (92.8% vs 87.8%, P = 0.016). However, there was no difference in 5-year OS between segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with low comorbidities (98.5% vs 97.4%, P = 0.867).

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of lobectomy and segmentectomy on NLCD depends on the extent of the patients' comorbidities.

Medical management of older patients with lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death globally. In addition, its incidence increases with age, with approximately half of all cases diagnosed in patients aged ≥70. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have markedly improved outcomes over the past two decades. Despite the high incidence of lung cancer in older people, most trials excluded such patients from enrollment. Therefore, the optimal treatment strategies for older patients remain unclear. The present review summarizes the published literature and provides guidance on the treatment of older patients with lung cancer within three broad stages: (i) early-stage lung cancer, (ii) locally advanced lung cancer and (iii) metastatic lung cancer. We also discuss the use of the latest evidence for older patients.

Functional status in older patients with lung cancer: an observational cohort study

PURPOSE

An assessment of the impact of functional status (FS) evaluated using a combination of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and the short version of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), on 3- and 6- month mortality and on 3-month unplanned hospitalizations in older patients treated for lung cancers.

METHOD AND OBJECTIVES

This observational retrospective study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2019 at Marseille University Hospital (AP-HM). During this period, all consecutive outpatients aged 70 years or older referred for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) before the initiation of lung cancer treatment were enrolled.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven patients were analyzed: the median age was 78.7 years and 74.0% were male. Almost half of the patients were metastatic (45.4%). Concerning FS, 41.9% of patients had no ADL-IADL impairment, 30.0% had either IADL or ADL impairment, and both ADL-IADL were impaired for 28.1%. Impaired ADL-IADL was associated with poor nutritional status, depression, mobility, and cognitive disorders. In a logistic regression model, ADL or IADL impairment (aOR = 2.1; 95% CI [1.0-4.2]; p = 0.037) and impaired ADL-IADL (aOR = 2.6; 95% CI [1.2-5.3]; p = 0.012) were independently associated with a higher risk of unplanned hospitalizations within 3 months. In the multivariate Cox model, 6-month mortality risk was independently associated with impaired ADL-IADL (aHR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.3-4.4]; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ADL and IADL scales to assess FS is a prognostic marker of the mortality risk at 6 months in older patients with lung cancer and should be more largely used by oncologists in treatment decision making.

Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an established therapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many elderly patients are medically inoperable owing to comorbidities. Therefore, SBRT may be a useful therapy for elderly patients. However, the application of SBRT for patients aged ≥ 80 years has not been completely elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical utility of SBRT for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven primary NSCLC who underwent SBRT at our institution between January 2009 and March 2020. Treatment outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate survival curves and the log-rank test to compare the survival curves. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. p-values < 0.05 were regarded significant.

Results

Sixty-four patients (65 lesions) were included, and the median follow-up period was 38.7 (range 3.5–95.7) months. The median age was 82.9 (range 80.0–94.8) years. Sixteen patients were medically operable, and 48 patients were medically inoperable. The prescribed dose of SBRT was either 48 Gy in four fractions or 60 Gy in 10 fractions. The median survival time was 60.0 months (95% confidence interval, 43.5–71.1). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 98.4%, 98.4%, 81.0%, and 88.9%; 90.1%, 93.7%, 58.9%, and 68.3%; and 87.4%, 83.5%, 38.2%, and 47.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that inoperability and solid nodules were the predictors of poor overall survival after SBRT in elderly patients. Two patients (3.1%) had grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, and one patient (1.6%) had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions

SBRT was feasible in patients aged ≥ 80 years with NSCLC. It achieved good local control with minimal toxicity. SBRT may be beneficial in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Octogenarians treated for thoracic and lung cancers: Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer affects older and older old adults and is the leading cause of death by cancer. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is recommended before and during cancer treatment to guide therapy management in this population.

METHODS

This study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2019 at Marseille University Hospital (AP-HM). During this period, all consecutive outpatients 70 years or older referred for a CGA before initiation of lung cancer treatment were enrolled. The objective of this study was to compare lung and thoracic cancer management of octogenarians (≥80 years) and their geriatric profile versus patients aged 70 to 79 years (<80 years).

FINDINGS

In our study, 228 patients were recruited. The median age was 78.7 ± 5 years. There were 94 octogenarians (41.2%), 36.2% of them were diagnosed with stage IV neoplasm and the most common treatment was chemotherapy (43.6%). The logistic regression analysis highlights that handgrip strength was the most commonly impaired domain (OR 2.3; 95% CI [1.3-4.3]) in octogenarians and that they are more likely than their younger counterparts to be treated by targeted therapy (OR 9.8; 95% CI [1.0-92.9]). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both age groups (log rank = 0,95).

INTERPRETATION

In our study, octogenarians and patients <80 years had equivalent survival, across the different thoracic cancer treatments and tumor stages. Measure of muscle strength in CGA could be very useful in a clinical setting to help improve the management of older old patients treated for lung or thoracic cancer.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Comparison of Epithor clinical national database and medico-administrative database to identify the influence of case-mix on the estimation of hospital outliers

Background

The national Epithor database was initiated in 2003 in France. Fifteen years on, a quality assessment of the recorded data seemed necessary. This study examines the completeness of the data recorded in Epithor through a comparison with the French PMSI database, which is the national medico-administrative reference database. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the influence of data quality with respect to identifying 30-day mortality hospital outliers.

Methods

We used each hospital’s individual FINESS code to compare the number of pulmonary resections and deaths recorded in Epithor to the figures found in the PMSI. Centers were classified into either the good-quality data (GQD) group or the low-quality data (LQD) group. To demonstrate the influence of case-mix quality on the ranking of centers with low-quality data, we used 2 methods to estimate the standardized mortality rate (SMR). For the first (SMR1), the expected number of deaths per hospital was estimated with risk-adjustment models fitted with low-quality data. For the second (SMR2), the expected number of deaths per hospital was estimated with a linear predictor for the LQD group using the coefficients of a logistic regression model developed from the GQD group.

Results

Of the hospitals that use Epithor, 25 were classified in the GQD group and 75 in the LQD group. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.8% (n = 300) in the GQD group vs. 1.9% (n = 181) in the LQD group (P <0.0001). The between-hospital differences in SMR1 appeared substantial (interquartile range (IQR) 0–1.036), and they were even higher in SMR2 (IQR 0–1.19). SMR1 identified 7 hospitals as high-mortality outliers. SMR2 identified 4 hospitals as high-mortality outliers. Some hospitals went from non-outlier to high mortality and vice-versa. Kappa values were roughly 0.46 and indicated moderate agreement.

Conclusion

We found that most hospitals provided Epithor with high-quality data, but other hospitals needed to improve the quality of the information provided. Quality control is essential for this type of database and necessary for the unbiased adjustment of regression models.

Delineating the pattern of treatment for elderly locally advanced NSCLC and predicting outcomes by a validated model: A SEER based analysis

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) represented a highly heterogeneous group, with more than half of the patients aged ≥65 years at the time of diagnosis. However, the optimal treatment for elderly LA-NSCLC patients was still not defined.

METHODS

A total of 33530 elderly patients (≥65 years) diagnosed with LA-NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

Locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients aged 65-74 years were more frequently treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (40%), while patients aged ≥75 years received more best supportive care (BSC) (36%). For age group of 65-74 years, patients who had surgery with or without (neo)adjuvant therapy had a median survival of 28 months, CRT 15 months, radiotherapy (RT) alone 6 months, chemotherapy alone 11 months, and BSC 3 months; while for patients aged ≥ 75 years, the median OS was 20, 13, 7, 9, and 2, respectively. Besides, independent clinicopathological factors were integrated into nomograms for OS and CSS prediction, C-indexes achieved 0.692 and 0.698, respectively. Importantly, the discrimination of nomogram was superior to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification (0.742 vs 0.572 for training set and 0.731 vs 0.565 for validation set).

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients with LA-NSCLC, the curative-intent treatment (surgery or CRT) conferred better survival compared to chemotherapy alone, RT alone and BSC. The proposed nomograms based on independent clinicopathological variables may be practical and helpful for precise evaluation of patient prognosis, and guiding the individualized treatment for elderly LA-NSCLC.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on outcomes of elderly patients undergoing open thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE

An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program might be effective for postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery. This study aimed to clarify the impact of ERAS on the post-operative recovery of elderly patients, with regard to shortening hospital stay and reducing complications after open thoracic surgery.

METHODS

We used a prospectively collected database and retrospectively accessed the data of patients who underwent lobectomies or segmentectomies for pulmonary malignancies from April 2013 to March 2018 and evaluated outcomes after implementation of ERAS. ERAS patients were those who completed an ERAS program. The control patients were those who underwent surgery before June 2015 and later operated patients who did not receive ERAS. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the characteristics of patients in both groups. Patients were also divided into the following three groups for evaluating the efficacy of ERAS: patients aged < 65 years, 65-74 years of age, and ≥ 75 years of age.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, the ERAS patients had shorter postoperative stay, shorter duration of chest tube drainage, and lower rate of postoperative complications than the patients without ERAS. The difference between readmission rates was not significant. After matching, the ERAS patients had shorter postoperative stay. The difference between readmission rates was not significant. After matching, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the patients aged ≥ 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS shortened the length of postoperative hospital stay in patients aged ≥ 65 years and did not increase readmission rates.

Prognostic impact of preoperative comorbidities in geriatric patients with early-stage lung cancer: Significance of sublobar resection as a compromise procedure

OBJECTIVES

In high-risk operable geriatric patients undergoing palliative sublobar resection (SR), noncancerous comorbidities may contribute to unfavorable outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and long-term survival of palliative SR in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 232 patients (141 male, 91 female) aged ≥75 years who underwent surgical resection of clinical stage I lung cancer from 2006 to 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, lobectomy and SR, and preoperative comprehensive comorbidities were assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) and compared between the two groups. The operative safety was compared using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival rates were calculated with a Kaplan-Meier model under propensity score matching, and prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Lobectomy was performed in 156 patients and SR in 76 (segmentectomy, n = 50; wedge resection, n = 26). Age (p = 0.0137), tumor size on computed tomography (p < 0.0001), central tumor location (p = 0.0008), and high ACE-27 scores (p = 0.0202) were significantly associated with selection of SR. No mortality occurred, and the incidence of Grade 3b or greater postoperative complications in lobectomy and SR was 5.1% and 5.3%, respectively. According to the analysis of propensity score-matched patients (n = 57, tumor size = 23 mm, and consolidation/tumor ratio = 83%), the 5-year survival rate in lobectomy and SR was 81.1% and 73.5%, respectively (p = 0.4374). The ACE-27 score was a more significant prognostic factor than the type of surgical procedure, as well as consolidation/tumor ratio and nodal metastatic status.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of preoperative comorbidities is a significant prognostic factor, and SR as a compromise surgical procedure may provide promising short- and long-term outcomes in selected geriatric patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.

Enhanced recovery for thoracic surgery in the elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both surgical workload and the age of those patients being considered for radial pulmonary resection are increasing. Enhanced recovery programmes are now well established in most surgical disciplines and are increasingly reported in thoracic procedures. This review will discuss the relevant principles of these programmes as applied to an increasing elderly population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elderly patients undergoing less radial surgical resections without lymphadenectomy have comparable outcomes to those undergoing classical curative treatment. Patients require careful assessment and self-reported quality of life metrics or function may be a better marker of outcome than static measures such as lung function. Hypotension, low values for bispectral index and low anaesthetic gas mean alveolar concentration values are common and independent predictors of mortality in the elderly. Paravertebral blockade is preferred to epidural anaesthesia because of a more favourable side-effect profile and comparable efficacy. As yet no robust work has examined the efficacy of an integrated enhanced recovery programme in thoracic surgery.

SUMMARY

Elderly patients are suitable for enhanced recovery programmes but these must be tailored to individual circumstance. Further work is required to comprehensively assess their value in a modern healthcare setting.

Definitive treatment patterns and survival in stage II non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study delineated definitive treatment patterns for Stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States and evaluated survival by treatment approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically-staged Stage II NSCLC treated with surgery-based therapy, chemoradiation, conventionally-fractionated radiation (CFR), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Median survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were computed using Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Between 2004-2012, 19,749 patients met study criteria: 13,382 (67.8%) underwent surgery-based treatment, 4,310 (21.8%) received chemoradiation, 1,606 (8.1%) received CFR, and 451 (2.3%) received SBRT. Surgery and SBRT utilization increased over time while CFR and chemoradiation decreased (all p ≤ 0.002). Patients receiving radiation-based treatments were older, with more comorbidities, and higher T/N stage (all p < 0.0001). With median follow-up of 25.2 months, median survival was 51.6, 23.3, 15.4, and 23.7 months for surgery-based treatment, chemoradiation, CFR, and SBRT, respectively (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, chemoradiation (HR 1.67 [1.59-1.75], p < 0.0001), CFR (HR 2.38 [2.22-2.55], p < 0.0001), and SBRT (HR 1.76 [1.53-2.01], p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased survival versus surgery-based treatment. CFR was associated with decreased survival versus chemoradiation (HR 1.52 [1.41-1.63], p < 0.0001) and SBRT (HR 1.39 [1.19-1.61], p < 0.0001). SBRT was associated with similar survival versus chemoradiation (HR 1.10 [0.95-1.27], p = 0.212).

CONCLUSION

NCDB data demonstrate increasing use of surgery-based treatments and SBRT for Stage II NSCLC over time. Radiation-based therapies were associated with decreased survival compared to surgery. CFR was associated with decreased survival compared to chemoradiation and SBRT.

Post-Treatment Mortality After Surgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose In early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), post-treatment mortality may influence the comparative effectiveness of surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), with implications for shared decision making among high-risk surgical candidates. We analyzed early mortality after these interventions using the National Cancer Database. Patients and Methods We abstracted patients with cT1-T2a, N0, M0 NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 undergoing either surgery or SBRT. Thirty-day and 90-day post-treatment mortality rates were calculated and compared using Cox regression and propensity score-matched analyses. Results We identified 76,623 patients who underwent surgery (78% lobectomy, 20% sublobar resection, 2% pneumonectomy) and 8,216 patients who received SBRT. In the unmatched cohort, mortality rates were moderately increased with surgery versus SBRT (30 days, 2.07% v 0.73% [absolute difference (Δ), 1.34%]; P < .001; 90 days, 3.59% v 2.93% [Δ, 0.66%]; P < .001). Among the 27,200 propensity score-matched patients, these differences increased (30 days, 2.41% v 0.79% [Δ, 1.62%]; P < .001; 90 days, 4.23% v 2.82% [Δ, 1.41%]; P < .001). Differences in mortality between surgery and SBRT increased with age, with interaction P < .001 at both 30 days and 90 days (71 to 75 years old: 30-day Δ, 1.87%; 90-day Δ, 2.02%; 76 to 80 years old: 30-day Δ, 2.80%; 90-day Δ, 2.59%; > 80 years old: 30-day Δ, 3.03%; 90-day Δ, 3.67%; all P ≤ .001). Compared with SBRT, surgical mortality rates were higher with increased extent of resection (30-day and 90-day multivariate hazard ratio for mortality: sublobar resection, 2.85 and 1.37; lobectomy, 3.65 and 1.60; pneumonectomy, 14.5 and 5.66; all P < 0.001). Conclusion Differences in 30- and 90-day post-treatment mortality between surgery and SBRT increased as a function of age, with the largest differences in favor of SBRT observed among patients older than 70 years. These representative mortality data may inform shared decision making among patients with early-stage NSCLC who are eligible for both interventions.

Resection rate and operability of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Nationwide study from 1991 to 2014

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of elderly patients are diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the surgical resection rate, operability and survival in this age group (≥75 years) to younger patients using centralized databases in Iceland.

METHODS

The study population comprised all patients diagnosed with NSCLC in Iceland from 1991 to 2014. A total of 140 elderly patients (≥75 years) with NSCLC underwent pulmonary resection and were compared with 550 surgically resected patients less than 75 years, with respect to resection rate, short and long-term survival and complications of surgery. Reasons for exclusion from surgery were registered for elderly surgical candidates (stages IA-IIB).

RESULTS

Surgical resection rate in the elderly group was 18% compared to 32% in the younger age group ( P <  0.001). The most frequent reasons for not operating on elderly patients in stages IA-IIB were poor pulmonary function (58%), heart disease (17%) or multiple comorbidities (17%). The rate of major complications following surgery was comparable in the elderly versus the younger age group, 13 vs 11%, respectively ( P =  0.578). The same was true for 30 day mortality (2 vs 1%, P =  0.397). Five-year overall survival was 40% vs 44% ( P =  0.019) and cancer-specific survival 51% vs 50% ( P =  0.802).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with resectable NSCLC according to stage are frequently excluded from surgery due to comorbid conditions. Although the operated patients may represent a selected group, their favourable 30-day and long-term survival indicate that more elderly patients with NSCLC could be operated on.

Impact of Increasing Age on Cause-Specific Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Competing Risks Analysis

Purpose To perform competing risks analysis and determine short- and long-term cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality and morbidity in patients who had undergone resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Of 5,371 consecutive patients who had undergone curative-intent resection of primary lung cancer at our institution (2000 to 2011), 2,186 with pathologic stage I NSCLC were included in the analysis. All preoperative clinical variables known to affect outcomes were included in the analysis, specifically, Charlson comorbidity index, predicted postoperative (ppo) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and ppo forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Cause-specific mortality analysis was performed with competing risks analysis. Results Of 2,186 patients, 1,532 (70.1%) were ≥ 65 years of age, including 638 (29.2%) ≥ 75 years of age. In patients < 65, 65 to 74, and ≥ 75 years of age, 5-year lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (CID) was 7.5%, 10.7%, and 13.2%, respectively (overall, 10.4%); noncancer-specific CID was 1.8%, 4.9%, and 9.0%, respectively (overall, 5.3%). In patients ≥ 65 years of age, for up to 2.5 years after resection, noncancer-specific CID was higher than lung cancer-specific CID; the higher noncancer-specific, early-phase mortality was enhanced in patients ≥ 75 years of age than in those 65 to 74 years of age. Multivariable analysis showed that low ppo diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide was an independent predictor of severe morbidity ( P < .001), 1-year mortality ( P < .001), and noncancer-specific mortality ( P < .001), whereas low ppo forced expiratory volume in 1 second was an independent predictor of lung cancer-specific mortality ( P = .002). Conclusion In patients who undergo curative-intent resection of stage I NSCLC, noncancer-specific mortality is a significant competing event, with an increasing impact as patient age increases.

Temporal patterns of care and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients in the United States diagnosed in 1996, 2005, and 2010

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer remains a common and deadly cancer in the United States. This study evaluated factors associated with stage-specific cancer therapy and survival focusing on temporal trends and sociodemographic disparities.

METHODS

A random sample (n=3,318) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients diagnosed in 1996, 2005 and 2010, and reported to the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program was analyzed. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with receipt of surgery among stage I/II patients and chemotherapy among stage IIIB/IV patients. Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to assess factors associated with all-cause mortality, stratified by stage.

RESULTS

Surgery among stage I/II patients decreased non-significantly overtime (1996: 78.8%; 2010: 68.5%; p=0.18), whereas receipt of chemotherapy among stage IIIB/IV patients increased significantly overtime (1996: 36.1%; 2010: 51.2%; p<0.01). Receipt of surgery (70-79 and ≥80 vs. <70: Odds Ratio(OR):0.31; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.16-0.63 and OR:0.04; 95% CI: 0.02-0.10, respectively) and chemotherapy (≥80 vs. <70: OR: 0.26; 95% CI:0.15-0.45) was less likely among older patients. Median survival improved non-significantly among stage I/II patients from 51 to 64 months (p=0.75) and significantly among IIIB/IV patients from 4 to 5 months (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Treatment disparities were observed in both stage groups, notably among older patients. Among stage I/II patients, survival did not change significantly possibly due to stable surgery utilization. Among stage IIIB/IV patients, although the use of chemotherapy increased and survival improved, the one-month increase in median survival highlights the need for addition research.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy is Highly Safe and Effective for Elderly Patients With Early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To discern the effectiveness and toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in the elderly population (aged ≥75 years) and to consider how SABR outcomes compare with surgical outcomes historically reported in the elderly.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 772 patients with clinical early-stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; stage T1-T3N0M0) underwent SABR (50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions) from 2004 to 2014 at our center (n=442, aged <75 years; n=330, aged ≥75 years). The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time-to-progression, and grade ≥3 toxicity. The median follow-up time was approximately 55 months.

RESULTS

Compared with patients aged <75 years, those aged ≥75 years had no difference in the time-to-progression (P=.419), lung cancer-specific survival (P=.275), or toxicity (P=.536). OS was the same between both age groups at 2 years of follow-up but diverged thereafter, with patients aged <75 years when treatment began having greater OS rates at 5 years. The median OS rates for patients aged ≥75 years were 86% at 1 year, 57.5% at 3 years, and 39.5% at 5 years. The median OS rates for patients aged <75 years were 87.3% at 1 year, 67.6% at 3 years, and 51.5% at 5 years. No patient aged ≥75 years experienced any grade 4 or 5 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of SABR was the same for the elderly as for the average-age population according to lung cancer-specific survival and time-to-progression. It also poses no increased toxicity. Compared with the historical outcomes with surgery in the elderly, SABR outcomes can be considered comparable for stage I-II disease but with less morbidity.

Prediction of Surgical Outcome by Modeling Based on Risk Factors of Morbidity After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for older patients with lung cancer presents more challenges compared with general population. The aim of the study was to predict surgical outcome after pulmonary resection in older patients with lung cancer by developing a clinical model.

METHODS

Clinical records of 525 patients who were older than 70 years of age and who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer in a single center were reviewed. Patients were divided into three ordered categories of surgical outcome according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. By using a development cohort of 401 patients, an ordinal logistic regression was performed to develop a prediction model for surgical outcome. The model was internally validated by the bootstrap method and was externally validated by another cohort of 124 patients. Two previous models were tested as benchmarks of our model.

RESULTS

The model was developed based on five risk factors of morbidity: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p < 0.001), pulmonary disease (p = 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.011), tumor location (p = 0.015), and surgical approach (p = 0.036). The c-statistic of the model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.80), which was similar to the bootstrapping one (0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.80). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a strong goodness of fit of the model (p = 0.674). In external validation, the performance of our model was superior to that of the two previous models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model displayed an acceptable ability to predict surgical outcome in older patients undergoing pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Use of the model can be helpful in decision making about surgical treatment in this special population.

Outcomes of Major Lung Resection After Induction Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the impact of age on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery after induction chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Short- and long-term outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were at least 70 years and received induction chemotherapy followed by major lung resection (lobectomy or pneumonectomy) from 1996 to 2012 were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazard analysis. The outcomes of these elderly patients were compared with those of patients younger than 70 years who underwent the same treatment from 1996 to 2012.

RESULTS

Of the 317 patients who met the study criteria, 53 patients were at least 70 years. The median age was 74 years (range, 70 to 82 years) in the elderly group, and induction chemoradiation was used in 24 (45%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the younger (n = 12) and elderly (n = 3) patients (5% versus 6%; p = 0.52). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between younger and elderly patients (49% versus 57%; p = 0.30). Patients younger than 70 years had a median overall survival (30 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24 to 43) and a 5-year survival (39%; 95% CI, 33 to 45) that was not significantly different from patients at least 70 years (median overall survival, 30 months; 95% CI, 18 to 68; and 5-year overall survival, 36%; 95% CI, 21 to 51). However, there was a trend toward worse survival in the elderly group after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.97 to 2.12; p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Major lung resection after induction chemotherapy can be performed with acceptable short- and long-term results in appropriately selected patients at least 70 years, with outcomes that are comparable to those of younger patients.

[Long-term results of lung cancer surgery in octogenarians]

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate late results of lung cancer surgery in octogenerians.

METHODS

All patients 80years old or more who underwent a lung resection for cancer from 2000 to 2010 at Lyon University Hospital were included. No patients were treated with video-assisted surgery. Wedge resections were excluded.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (42 men, 21 women) were operated. The median age was 82years. Operative mortality was 4.7%. The rate of perioperative complications was 49%. The late survival was 34% at 5years. Five-year survival by nodal involvement was N0, 36%; N1, 29%; N2 20%, P<0.05. Patients with a squamous cell carcinoma (24) had a better long-term survival than patients with an adenocarcinoma (30), 33% and 25% respectively at 5years, P<0.05. The rate of recurrence was 33.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of lung cancer in selected population of octogenerians is associated with satisfactory early and long-term results. Survival is influenced by nodal involvement and by the pathologic type of the cancer.

A retrospective comparative analysis of elderly and younger patients undergoing pulmonary resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Age has been a critical predictor for immediate postoperative and long-term results after the pulmonary resection for lung cancer. In this study, we evaluated and compared surgical outcome of stage I non-small cell lung cancer and associated predictive factors between elderly and younger groups.

Methods

Short- and long-term outcomes of elderly group (≥70 years) who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed as stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2004 to 2010 were compared to the results of younger group (<70 years).

Results

Total of 1340 patients were included in this study, and the patients were divided into the elderly group (n = 285) and the younger group (n = 1055). The proportions of squamous cell carcinoma (36.8 vs. 20.0 %, p < 0.001) and stage IB cancer (58.3 vs. 40.6 %, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the elderly group than the younger group. The 30-day and 90-day mortalities were significantly higher in the elderly group (1.8 vs. 0%; p = 0.014, 3.9 vs. 0.5 %; p < 0.001, respectively). The elderly patients also had significantly worse long-term outcomes than the younger group (5-year overall survival rate, 69.0 vs. 91.1 %; p < 0.001, 5-year disease-free survival rate, 53.3 vs. 80.2 %; p < 0.001). Decreased diffusion capacity less than 70 % was an important predictive factor for short- and long-term outcomes in both the younger and the elderly group.

Conclusions

Elderly patients with low diffusion capacity are at risk for significantly worse outcome, indicating that patient selection should include assessment of pulmonary function, including diffusion capacity.

Management of Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in the USA. The median age at diagnosis of lung cancer is 70 years, and thus, about one-half of patients with lung cancer fall into the elderly subgroup. There is dearth of high level of evidence regarding the management of lung cancer in the elderly in the three broad stages of the disease including early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic disease. A major reason for the lack of evidence is the underrepresentation of elderly in prospective randomized clinical trials. Due to the typical decline in physical and physiologic function associated with aging, most elderly do not meet the stringent eligibility criteria set forth in age-unselected clinical trials. In addition to performance status, ideally, comorbidity, cognitive, and psychological function, polypharmacy, social support, and patient preferences should be taken into account before applying prevailing treatment paradigms often derived in younger, healthier patients to the care of the elderly patient with lung cancer. The purpose of this chapter was to review the existing evidence of management of early-stage, locally advanced disease, and metastatic lung cancer in the elderly.

Treatment Approaches in 102 Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

The life expectancy and presence of co-morbidities cause reservations in treatment decisions for elderly patients with cancer. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 102 patients who are considered as middle-old aged (aged 75 - 84) by gerontologists.

Methods

Medical records of patients were reviewed. One hundred and two patients with a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose follow-up ended with death between March 2006 and May 2013 were examined.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 77 (75 - 85) years. Thirty-three patients (67.6%) were over 80 years old. The number of patients with metastasis was 57 (55.8%). Forty-two (41.2%) patients had stage IIIA and IIIB disease. Fifteen of the metastatic patients (26.3%) were given chemotherapy, while 12 of the non-metastatic patients (26.6%) were given chemotherapy. Of the non-metastatic patients, 25 (55.6%) were treated with radiotherapy, and five (11.1%) were treated with chemotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 4 (1-55) months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months in non-metastatic patients, and 3 months in metastatic patients. Overall survival (OS) was 4 months. OS rates for 1 and 2 years were 10% and 2%.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be administered even to patients of this age group. The beneficial effect of chemotherapy in patients with metastasis on OS is an important finding of our study.

Risk factors of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia in stage I-IIIa lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the related risk factors of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia (POP) in patients with I-IIIa lung cancer.

METHODS

Medical records of 511 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer between January 2012 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors of postoperative pneumonia were identified and evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative pneumonia in these lung cancer patients was 2.9% (15 cases). Compared with 496 patients who had no pneumonia infection after operation, older age (>60), histopathological type of squamous cell carcinoma and longer surgery time (>3h) were significant risk factors by univariate analysis. Other potential risk factors such as alcohol consumption, history of smoking, hypersensitivity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and so on were not showed such significance in this study. Further, the multivariate analysis revealed that old age (>60 years) (OR 5.813, p=0.018) and histopathological type of squamous cell carcinoma (OR 5.831, p<0.001) were also statistically significant independent risk factors for postoperative pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that being old aged (>60 years) and having squamous cell carcinoma histopathological type might be important factors in determining the risk of postoperative pneumonia in lung cancer patients after surgery.

[Value of modified POSSUM scoring system on predicting operation risk in elderly NSCLC patients]

BACKGROUND

For the assessment of elderly patients can tolerate lung cancer operation, there is no clear standard. To evaluate the clinical validity of POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Umeration of Mortality and Morbidity) in elderly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery patients, we want to provide an important basis for operation treatment decisions.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients, with 88 males and 50 females, with elderly NSCLC surgery between December 2007 and December 2013, are included in PLA general hospital. Using the multivariate Logistic regression analysis, we evaluate the value of each factor on the actual postoperative complications mortality and morbidity. The scorings on standard POSSUM and modified POSSUM in the complication group are compared with the non-complication group using the group t test. Drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in standard POSSUM group and modified POSSUM group, calculating the area under the curve (AUC), AUC in standard group is compared with modified group using t test. Judge if the modified POSSUM prediction is consistent with the actual mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

Among 138 patients, there were 77 postoperative complications in 59 patients, 2 cases of death. According to the Logistic regression analysis, 17 of 18 factors in standard POSSUM, pulmonary function, different TNM stage are predictors for postoperative complications (P<0.05). Age is a predictor for postoperative death (P<0.05). In the standard POSSUM scoring, actual complication group compared with non-complication group, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.01). In the modified POSSUM scoring, complication group is compared with non-complication group, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.01). Compared with the standard POSSUM, the modified POSSUM has better predictive value on postoperative morbidity, and the comparison of AUC between the two groups is statistically significant. But the latter shows the overpredicted mortality (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified POSSUM has a good predictive value on postoperative complications in elderly NSCLC surgery patients, so it can provide the basis for decision-making operation treatment.

A review of the management of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are elderly but evidence to guide appropriate treatment decisions for this age group is generally scant. Careful evaluation of the elderly should be undertaken to ensure that treatment appropriate for the stage of the tumour is guided by patient characteristics and not by age. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) remains the preferred option, but briefer tools may be appropriate to select patients for further evaluation. The predicted outcome should be used to guide management decisions together with a reappraisal of polypharmacy. Patient expectations should also be taken into account. Management recommendations are generally similar to those of general guidelines for the NSCLC population, although the risks of surgery and toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are often increased in the elderly compared with younger patients; therefore, patients should be closely scrutinised and subjected to a CGA to ensure suitability of the planned treatment. If surgery is indicated, then lobectomy is generally the preferred option, although limited resection may be more feasible for some. Radiotherapy with curative intent is an alternative, with stereotactic body radiotherapy the most likely preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is also an appropriate approach, whereas adjuvant radiotherapy is generally not recommended. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy should be considered for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced disease and chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Efforts should also be made to increase participation of elderly patients with NSCLC in clinical trials, thereby enhancing evidence-based treatment decisions for this majority group. This will require overcoming barriers relating to trial design and to physician and patient awareness and attitudes.

Management of elderly patients with NSCLC; updated expert's opinion paper: EORTC Elderly Task Force, Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very common disease in the elderly population and its incidence in this particular population is expected to increase further, because of the ageing of the Western population. Despite this, limited data are available for the treatment of these patients and, therefore, the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations is challenging. In 2010, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) took an initiative in collaboration with International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and created an experts panel that provided an experts' opinion consensus paper for the management of elderly NSCLC patients. Since this publication, important new data are available and EORTC and SIOG recommended to update the 2010 recommendations. Besides recommendations for surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease, recommendations were expanded, to include data on patient preferences and geriatric assessment.

[Lung cancer in the elderly: what about surgery?]

Geriatric oncology is a rapidly expanding domain because of the deep epidemiological changes of the last decades related to the ageing of the population. Lung cancer treatment in patients 75 years and over is a major issue of thoracic oncology. Curative surgery remains the treatment offering the best survival rates to the patient whatever his age. The important variability observed within the elderly forces us to take into account their specificities, in particular for ageing physiology and associated comorbidities. Thus, preoperative workup permitting to assess the resectability of the tumor but also the operability of the patient is all the more essential in the advanced age that it must be adapted to the particular characteristics of the elderly. Thanks to recent data of the literature, morbidity and mortality associated to surgical treatment are now better characterized and considered as acceptable in accordance with long-term survival. Clinical investigation remains essential to acquire a better knowledge of potential benefit of multimodal treatments in the elderly, for which very few data are available.

The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on the 30-day mortality of lung cancer surgery: A nation-based reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the time trend variation of 30-day mortality after lung cancer surgery, and to quantify the impact of surgeon and hospital volumes over a 5-year period in France.

METHODS

We used Epithor, the French national thoracic database and benchmark tool, which catalogues more than 180,000 procedures of 89 private and public hospitals in France. From January 2005 to December 2010, 19,556 patients who underwent major lung resection (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy) were included in our study. Multilevel logistic models were designed to investigate the relationship between 30-day mortality and surgeon (model 1) or hospital (model 2) volumes. The 3 levels considered were the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2007, the 30-day mortality of patients who underwent major lung resection averaged 10%, and then decreased until it reached 3.8% in 2010 (P < .0001). A significant decrease in 30-day mortality was observed over time (P = .0046). During the study period, the mean annual number of procedures per surgeon was 46.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 23.6) and per hospital was 97.9 (SD = 50.8). Model 1 showed that surgeon volume had a significant impact on 30-day mortality (P = .03), whereas model 2 failed to show that hospital volume influenced 30-day mortality (P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2007, when France's first National Cancer Plan became effective, 30-day mortality of primary lung cancer surgery has decreased and currently measures 3.8%. Low mortality was correlated with higher surgeon volume but was not influenced by hospital volume, which cannot be considered a proxy measure for determining the safety of lung cancer surgery.

A very elderly lung cancer patient: case report of a long disease free survival

Despite the fact that non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in the older population, these patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical and surgical trials and thus it is difficult to reach evidence-based recommendations for this special population. We present a case of a surgical treatment of asymptomatic lung cancer in a very elderly patient. The patient had no recurrence for 4 years after a complete resection.

Evaluation and management of elderly patients with lung cancer

Most patients diagnosed with lung cancer are older than 65 years. Advancing age is associated with increased medical and psychosocial issues that increase the complexity of care. This article provides a summary and update of work-up and management of elderly patients with lung cancer. Patient-related prognostic factors with attention to assessment of comorbidity in lung cancer patients are reviewed. Recent literature regarding toxicity and advances in locoregional and systemic therapies are reviewed, with recommendations for management.

Postoperative complications in elderly patients after lung cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. These complications remain higher in elderly patients than in young patients, and decreasing their incidence is an important goal. We investigated surgical factors in particular, including surgical time, blood loss and thoracotomy length.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and September 2009, 567 patients underwent lung cancer surgery at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 119 patients who underwent lobectomy, aged 75 years or older, for possible postoperative complication risk factors.

RESULTS

The patients' median age was 77 years (range, 75-88 years); there were 79 men and 40 women. There were no perioperative or postoperative deaths. Postoperative complications developed in 41 (34.5%) patients, including 17 (14.3%) with arrhythmia, 10 (8.4%) with prolonged air leak, 10 (8.4%) with delirium, 8 (6.7%) with pneumonia, 4 (3.4%) with hypoxia, 2 (1.7%) with cerebrovascular disease and 1 (0.8%) with postoperative haemorrhage. Univariate analysis showed that the risk factors for postoperative complications consisted of longer surgery time (P = 0.002), blood loss (P = 0.021) and undergoing surgery prior to May 2004 (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that surgery time (P = 0.041) and surgery prior to May 2004 (P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the quality of surgery is an important factor in determining the risk of postoperative complications. Severe adhesions and lung inflammation are conditions that make lung cancer surgery difficult; a skillful and meticulous surgical technique is required in elderly patients.

Mediastinal lymphadenectomy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The progressive ageing of the population is accompanied by an increasing incidence of cancer. Our objective was to compare mediastinal lymphadenectomy performed in the surgical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients between ≥ 70 and <70.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-centre case-control study, including 80 patients ≥ 70 years of age, surgically treated for NSCLC between January 2008 and December 2010, matched 1:1 to 80 younger controls on gender, American Society of Anesthesia score, performance status and histological subtype of the tumour. The number and type of dissected hilar/intrapulmonary and mediastinal lymph node stations as well as the number of resected lymph nodes were compared between the two age groups.

RESULTS

The type of pulmonary resection was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.03): pneumonectomy 6% (n = 5) for patients ≥ 70 vs 12% (n = 10) for patients <70, lobectomy 85 (n = 68) vs 65% (n = 52), bilobectomy 1 (n = 1) vs 2% (n = 2) and sub-lobar resection 7 (n = 6) vs 20% (n = 16). There was no significant difference in type of mediastinal lymphadenectomy (radical vs sampling; P = 0.6). Elderly patients presented a more advanced N status of lymph node invasion than younger controls (P = 0.02). The number and type of dissected lymph node stations and the number of lymph nodes were not significantly different between the two age groups (P = 0.66 and 0.25, respectively). The mean number of metastatic lymph nodes was higher in patients ≥ 70 (2.3 vs 1.3 in patients <70; P = 0.002). Lymph node ratio between metastatic and resected lymph nodes was higher in elderly patients (0.11 vs 0.07 in younger controls; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node involvement in surgically treated NSCLC was more significant in elderly patients ≥ 70 than in younger patients presenting comparable clinical and histopathological characteristics, and undergoing a similar lymphadenectomy.