Cost-effectiveness of head CT in patients with lung cancer without clinical evidence of metastases

Overuse of Diagnostic Brain Imaging Among Patients With Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Among patients diagnosed with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of occult brain metastasis is low, and several professional societies recommend against brain imaging for staging purposes. The goal of this study was to characterize the use of brain imaging among Medicare patients diagnosed with stage IA NSCLC.

METHODS

Using data from linked SEER-Medicare claims, we identified patients diagnosed with AJCC 8th edition stage IA NSCLC in 2004 through 2013. Patients were classified as having received brain imaging if they underwent head CT or brain MRI from 1 month before to 3 months after diagnosis. We identified factors associated with receipt of brain imaging using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 13,809 patients with stage IA NSCLC, 3,417 (25%) underwent brain imaging at time of diagnosis. The rate of brain imaging increased over time, from 23.5% in 2004 to 28.7% in 2013 (P=.0006). There was significant variation in the use of brain imaging across hospital service areas, with rates ranging from 0% to 64.0%. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of brain imaging included older age (odds ratios [ORs] of 1.16 for 70-74 years, 1.13 for 75-79 years, 1.31 for 80-84 years, and 1.46 for ≥85 years compared with 65-69 years; all P<.05), female sex (OR, 1.09; P<.05), black race (OR 1.23; P<.05), larger tumor size (ORs of 1.23 for 11-20 mm and 1.28 for 21-30 mm tumors vs 1-10 mm tumors; all P<.05), and higher modified Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (OR, 1.28 for score >1 vs score of 0; P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 1 in 4 patients with stage IA NSCLC received brain imaging at the time of diagnosis despite national recommendations against the practice. Although several patient factors are associated with receipt of brain imaging, there is significant geographic variation across the United States. Closer adherence to clinical guidelines is likely to result in more cost-effective care.

CNS Metastases in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Health Resource Utilization

PURPOSE

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer commonly experience disease progression in the CNS. Here, we assess the impact of CNS disease on resource utilization and outcomes in patients who are EGFRm.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective review of all advanced patients who were EGFRm, referred to BC Cancer, and treated with a first- and/or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor from 2010 to 2015. Baseline characteristics, systemic treatment, and CNS management were collected. We compared health resource utilization (HRU) between patients with CNS-negative disease and those with CNS metastases from the median time of CNS metastases diagnosis to death or last follow-up (9.1 months) and at 9 months preceding death or last follow-up for the CNS-negative group.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-nine patients were referred, of which 68% were female; 51% were of Asian ethnicity; and 57%, 37%, and 6% were exon 19, 21, or other, respectively; with a median age of 66 years. Two hundred twenty-nine (46%) of 499 patients developed CNS metastases-39% at diagnosis and 61% over the course of disease. CNS metastases were managed with surgery with or without whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; 13%) WBRT alone (73%), stereotactic radiosurgery with or without WBRT (5%), or no CNS-directed therapy (9%). The median time from the development of CNS metastases diagnosis to death was 9.1 months. CNS-negative patients used less HRU versus patients that were CNS-positive in the 9 months preceding death or last follow-up-in the average number of clinic visits (8.53 v 12.71, respectively; P < .001), hospitalizations (0.43 v 0.76, respectively; P < .001), CNS imaging investigations (0.52 v 2.65, respectively; P < .001), emergency room visits (0.03 v 0.14, respectively; P = .001), palliative care unit admission (8% v 10%, respectively; P = .64), and hospice admission (3% v 19%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CNS metastases in patients with EGFRm is high and associated with increased HRU. Prevention or delay of CNS metastases with newer systemic therapy options may translate into lower resource utilization.

A case-matched study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: comparing treatment results for those with versus without neurological symptoms

We aimed to reappraise whether post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results for brain metastases differ between patients with and without neurological symptoms. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our prospectively accumulated database including 2825 consecutive BM patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone during the 15-year period since July 1998. The 2825 patients were divided into two groups; neurologically asymptomatic [group A, 1374 patients (48.6 %)] and neurologically symptomatic [group B, 1451 (51.4 %)]. Because there was considerable bias in pre-SRS clinical factors between groups A and B, a case-matched study was conducted. Ultimately, 1644 patients (822 in each group) were selected. The standard Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine post-SRS survival. Competing risk analysis was applied to estimate cumulative incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, re-SRS for new lesions and SRS-induced complications. Post-SRS median survival times (MSTs) did not differ between the two groups; 7.8 months in group A versus 7.4 months in group B patients (HR 1.064, 95 % CI 0.963–1.177, p = 0.22). However, cumulative incidences of neurological death (HR 1.637, 95 % CI 1.174–2.281, p = 0.0036) and neurological deterioration (HR 1.425, 95 % CI 1.073–1.894, p = 0.014) were significantly lower in the group A than in the group B patients. Neurologically asymptomatic patients undergoing SRS for BM had better results than symptomatic patients in terms of both maintenance of good neurological state and prolonged neurological survival. Thus, we conclude that screening computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is highly beneficial for managing cancer patients.

Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort

PURPOSE

Optimizing evidence-based care to improve quality is a critical priority in the United States. We sought to examine adherence to imaging guideline recommendations for staging in patients with locally advanced lung cancer in a national cohort.

METHODS

We identified 3,808 patients with stage IIB, IIIA, or IIIB lung cancer by using the national Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Central Cancer Registry (2004-2007) and linked these patients to VA and Medicare databases to examine receipt of guideline-recommended imaging based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. Our primary outcomes were receipt of guideline-recommended brain imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We also examined rates of overuse defined as combined use of bone scintigraphy (BS) and PET, which current guidelines recommend against. All imaging was assessed during the period 180 days before and 180 days after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Nearly 75% of patients received recommended brain imaging, and 60% received recommended PET imaging. Overuse of BS and PET occurred in 25% of patients. More advanced clinical stage and later year of diagnosis were the only clinical or demographic factors associated with higher rates of guideline-recommended imaging after adjusting for covariates. We observed considerable regional variation in recommended PET imaging and overuse of combined BS and PET.

CONCLUSION

Receipt of guideline-recommended imaging is not universal. PET appears to be underused overall, whereas BS demonstrates continued overuse. Wide regional variation suggests that these findings could be the result of local practice patterns, which may be amenable to provider education efforts such as Choosing Wisely.

Clinical and economic outcomes of patients with brain metastases based on symptoms: an argument for routine brain screening of those treated with upfront radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Insurers have started to deny reimbursement for routine brain surveillance with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases in favor of symptom-prompted imaging. The authors investigated the clinical and economic impact of symptomatic versus asymptomatic metastases and related these findings to the use of routine brain surveillance.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2010, 442 patients underwent upfront SRS for brain metastases. In total, 127 asymptomatic patients and 315 symptomatic patients were included. Medical records were used to determine the presenting symptoms, distant and local brain failure, retreatment, and need for hospital and rehabilitative care. Cost-of-care estimates were based on Medicare payment rates as of January 2013.

RESULTS

Symptomatic patients had an increased hazard for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.448) and were more likely to experience neurologic death (42% vs 20%; P < .0001). Relative to asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients required more craniotomies (43% vs 5%; P < .0001), had more prolonged hospitalization (2 vs 0 days; P < .0001), were more likely to have Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 and 4 post-treatment symptoms (24% vs 5%; P < .0001), and required $11,957 more on average to manage per patient. Accounting for all-cause mortality rates and the probability of diagnosis at each follow-up period, the authors estimated that insurers would save an average $1326 per patient by covering routine surveillance MRI after SRS to detect asymptomatic metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented with symptomatic brain metastases had worse clinical outcomes and cost more to manage than asymptomatic patients. The current findings argue that routine brain surveillance after radiosurgery has clinical benefits and reduces the cost of care.

Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies and invasive tests are available. Understanding the accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of the available methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer is critical to decision-making.

METHODS

Test accuracies for the available staging studies were updated from the second iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE database were performed up to June 2012 with the inclusion of selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were approximately 55% and 81%, respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were approximately 77% and 86%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning, but tissue biopsy is still required to confirm PET scan findings. The needle techniques endobronchial ultrasound-needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration, and combined endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration have sensitivities of approximately 89%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. In direct comparison with surgical staging, needle techniques have emerged as the best first diagnostic tools to obtain tissue. Based on randomized controlled trials, PET or PET-CT scanning is recommended for staging and to detect unsuspected metastatic disease and avoid noncurative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the last iteration of the staging guidelines, PET scanning has assumed a more prominent role both in its use prior to surgery and when evaluating for metastatic disease. Minimally invasive needle techniques to stage the mediastinum have become increasingly accepted and are the tests of first choice to confirm mediastinal disease in accessible lymph node stations. If negative, these needle techniques should be followed by surgical biopsy. All abnormal scans should be confirmed by tissue biopsy (by whatever method is available) to ensure accurate staging. Evidence suggests that more complete staging improves patient outcomes.

Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to the initial evaluation of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. It also includes an assessment of the impact of timeliness of care and multidisciplinary teams on outcome.

METHODS

The applicable current medical literature was identified by a computerized search and evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Data sources included MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS

Initial evaluation should include a thorough history and physical examination; CT imaging; pulmonary function tests; and hemoglobin, electrolyte, liver function, and calcium levels. Additional testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes should be determined on the basis of these results. Paraneoplastic syndromes may have an adverse impact on cancer treatment, so they should be controlled rapidly with the goal of proceeding with definitive cancer treatment in a timely manner. Although the relationship between timeliness of care and survival is difficult to quantify, efforts to deliver timely care are reasonable and should be balanced with the need to attend to other dimensions of health-care quality (eg, safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equality, consistency with patient values and preferences). Quality care will require multiple disciplines. Although it is difficult to assess the impact, we suggest that a multidisciplinary team approach to care be used, particularly for patients requiring multimodality therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer should include a thorough history and physical examination, pulmonary function tests, CT imaging, basic laboratory tests, and selective testing for distant metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes.

A diagnostic model to detect silent brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We aimed to discriminate subgroups according to the risk of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking neurological symptoms. We performed a retrospective review of 433 patients with NSCLC who underwent chest computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scans at an initial staging work-up between April 2003 and April 2007. Brain metastases were determined by MRI. Patients were stratified into groups according to the number of risk factors (0-3) identified by multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, histopathology with non-squamous cell carcinoma, nodal stage 2 on CT and presence of bone metastases were three risk factors for brain metastases. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number (0-3) of these predictive factors. The proportions of patients with brain metastases in the four groups were 2%, 3%, 17% and 35%, respectively, and these differences were significant (P<0.001). When analysis was performed in patients with localised disease, the number of risk factors was correlated with the prevalence of brain metastases (P=0.013) but stage was not (P=0.153). Although this diagnostic model should be validated through further studies, our data suggest that the number of risk factors might be a useful tool to identify silent brain metastases in patients with NSCLC.

CT, positron emission tomography, and MRI in staging lung cancer

Lung cancer is a common malignancy and remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States. Imaging plays an important role in the detection, diagnosis, and staging of the disease as well as in assessing response to therapy and monitoring for tumor recurrence after treatment. This article reviews the staging of the two major histologic categories of lung cancer-non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and small-cell lung carcinoma-and emphasizes the appropriate use of CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography imaging in patient management. Also discussed are proposed revisions of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer's terms used to describe the extent of NSCLC in terms of the primary tumor, lymph nodes, and metastases descriptors.

Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies including chest CT scanning and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning are available. Understanding the test characteristics of these noninvasive staging studies is critical to decision making.

METHODS

Test characteristics for the noninvasive staging studies were updated from the first iteration of the lung cancer guidelines using systematic searches of the MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2006, including selected metaanalyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 54%) and 85% (95% CI, 84 to 88%), respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were 74% (95% CI, 69 to 79%) and 85% (95% CI, 82 to 88%), respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning. If the clinical evaluation in search of metastatic disease is negative, the likelihood of finding metastasis is low.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scanning of the chest is useful in providing anatomic detail, but the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is poor. PET scanning has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum, and distant metastatic disease can be detected by PET scanning. With either test, abnormal findings must be confirmed by tissue biopsy to ensure accurate staging.

Detecting extrathoracic metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Is routine scanning necessary?

There is controversy over whether to scan extrathoracic sites for metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We tested the efficiency of clinical factors to determine whether metastasis has occurred, and whether routine scanning for NSCLC is required. Nine hundred and forty five patients scanned for extrathoracic metasates were included. Clinical factors indicating metastasis were determined using multivariate analysis. Of the 945 cases, 377 (39.9%) had metastasis. Bone metastases were determined by focal skeleton pains, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels, adenocarcinoma, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 90.6, specificity of 12.7, PPV of 16.3, NPV of 87.8, and silent metastases rate (SMR) of 9.4%. Brain metastases were determined by neurological symptoms, adenocarcinoma, hematocrite <40 for men and <35 for women, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 89.9, specificity of 7.9, PPV of 9.2, NPV of 88.3, and SMR of 10.1%. Abdominal metastases were determined by abdominal pain/tension, hepatomegaly, elevated GGT levels, serum LDH levels >500 IU, a N2 or N3 case, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 95.9, specificity of 7.1, PPV of 13.3, NPV of 92.1 and SMR of 4.1%. Of the 224 patients with stage I and II disease, 73 had metastasis with a rate of 10.9% silent metastasis. We concluded that routine scanning of NSCLC for staging is necessary.

Imaging to optimally stage lung cancer: conventional modalities and PET/CT

Accurately staging patients with lung cancer is important in determining treatment options and prognoses. Staging allows the distinction of patients who are candidates for surgical resection from those with inoperable disease who may be treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Conventional imaging plays an essential role in the noninvasive and invasive methods of the evaluation and staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Imaging modalities used for staging include chest radiography, chest computed tomography (CT), abdominal CT, brain CT or magnetic resonance imaging, bone scans, and (18)F-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET). Recently, PET/CT, the integration of the functional data of PET with the anatomic data of CT, has emerged as a modality to potentially change the way patients are evaluated. This article reviews current recommendations regarding the staging of patients with NSCLC and addresses the role of PET/CT.

Does initial staging or tumor histology better identify asymptomatic brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the distribution, staging features, or tumor histology of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) distinguishes neurologically symptomatic from asymptomatic patients initially diagnosed with lung cancer, and to determine whether these factors may predict the presence of brain metastasis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 809 patients with NSCLC and brain metastases who were treated in our institution between January 1996 and March 2003. Patients who had brain metastasis on initial staging were included. Thoracic computed tomographic scans were reviewed for lung tumor features and staging. Neurological computed tomographic or magnetic resonance image scans were assessed for distribution of brain metastases. Medical records were reviewed for comprehensive staging, tumor histology, and neurological symptoms. Fisher's exact test was used to determine any differences among tumor histology, staging, and imaging features among patients with or without neurological symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 809 patients, 181 had brain metastasis at initial staging. Among these 181 patients, 120 (66%) presented with neurological symptoms (group 1); 61 (34%) patients were asymptomatic (group 2). Patients with adenocarcinoma and large-cell carcinoma had greater odds of brain metastases than patients with squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.001). There were 106 (58.6%) patients with adenocarcinoma, 32 (17.7%) with large cell carcinoma, and 18 (9.9%) with squamous cell carcinoma. In both groups, most lung cancers were in the right lung with upper lobe dominance. No significant difference in tumor histology or T stage was found between groups, although group 2 was more likely to have a higher N stage. Of the 181 patients with brain metastasis, 60 (33.1%) had N0 disease, 51 (28.2%) had T1 disease, and 23 (19.2%) had no other metastasis. There was no correlation between number/distribution of brain metastases and tumor histology, although patients with disease in the cerebellum or temporal lobes had a greater likelihood of neurological symptoms (odds ratio 3.7).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in tumor histology, staging, or distribution between symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with NSCLC with brain metastases. The odds of brain metastases were greater in those with adenocarcinoma or large-cell carcinoma.

Comparative study of vascular enhancement on post-contrast CT using three dosages of iodinated contrast media for the aim of detecting brain metastasis in patients with lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

A prospective double-blind randomized study was performed to compare the contrast of vascular enhancement using three dosages of iodinated contrast media for a possible metastatic lesion in the brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients with lung cancer received brain computed tomography (CT) with intravenous administration of iodinated contrast medium (CM). The patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the three types of CM: 30 g iodine, 24 g iodine, and 15 g iodine. Three radiologists judged the degree of vascular contrast enhancement and diagnosed the presence of brain metastasis. The CT numbers in major arteries were also measured.

RESULTS

The subjective average scores with standard deviation were 2.06+/-0.48, 1.97+/-048, and 1.44+/-0.43, and the measured average CT numbers with standard deviation (SD) were 168.5+/-39.6, 166.1+/-28.6, and 146.1+/-27.0 HU with 30 g, 24 g, and 15 g iodine, respectively. The scores and the CT numbers in 15 g iodine were less than those with 30 g and 24 g iodine. Brain metastasis was detected in one patient each in groups A and C, and one false-positive case was found in group B.

CONCLUSION

CT study with a dose of 24 g iodine showed equivalent quality on vascular enhancement in comparison with a 30 g iodine dose.

Imaging of the Patient with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States for both men and women. Even though the 5-year survival rate of patients with lung cancer remains dismal at 14% for all cancer stages, treatments are improving and newer agents for lung cancer appear promising. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the extent of disease is critical to determine whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the staging evaluation of the patient; however, radiologists need to be aware that there are also important differences in what each specialist needs from imaging to provide appropriate treatment. This article reviews the role of imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an emphasis on the radiologic imaging findings relevant for each specialty.

Imaging of non-small cell lung cancer

Radiologic evaluation is an important component of the clinical staging evaluation of lung cancer and can greatly influence whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. In addition to staging, the radiologic evaluation of the patient undergoing treatment and subsequent follow-up is important to the clinician for assessing treatment effects and complications. This article discusses the imaging of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and its use in management of these patients.

The value of performing head CT in screening for cerebral metastases in patients with potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer: experience from a UK cardiothoracic centre

AIM

To evaluate the whether screening for cerebral metastases in neurologically intact patients with potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients is both worthwhile and cost-effective.

METHODS

We prospectively performed computed tomography (CT) of the head in 105 consecutive patients with potentially resectable lung cancer over an 18-month period. None of these patients had neurological symptoms or signs.

RESULTS

Five patients (4.8%) with cerebral metastases were identified using CT. At our institution the financial saving of avoiding five thoracotomies was pound sterling 45,000, whilst the cost of performing 105 head CTs was pound sterling 16,000. This represented a substantial saving for the healthcare provider and preserved the quality of life in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that screening for cerebral metastases in neurologically intact patients with potentially resectable non small cell lung cancer patients is both worthwhile and cost effective.

Brain neoplasms: epidemiology, diagnosis, and prospects for cost-effective imaging

Currently, the literature lacks a solid body of research on decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of imaging strategies for adults and children suspected of having a brain neoplasm. This article describes the epidemiology and clinical presentation of brain neoplasms, reviews current diagnostic strategies, highlights gaps in the literature on decision and cost-effectiveness analysis, and suggests directions for future research.

The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines

Correctly staging lung cancer is extremely important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies are available to aid in identifying disease both within and outside of the chest. Chest CT scanning is useful in providing anatomic detail that better identifies the location of the tumor, its proximity to local structures, and whether or not lymph nodes in the mediastinum are enlarged. Unfortunately, the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is unacceptably low. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scanning provides functional information on tissue activity and has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum. In addition, metastatic disease can be detected by PET scan. Still, positive findings of PET scans can occur from nonmalignant etiologies (eg, infections), so that tissue sampling to confirm the suspected malignancy must be performed. The clinical evaluation tool, which is composed of a thorough history and physical examination, remains the best predictor of metastatic disease. If the findings from the clinical evaluation are negative, then imaging studies such as a CT scan of the head, a bone scan, or an abdominal CT scan are unnecessary, and the search for metastatic disease is complete. If signs, symptoms, or findings from the physical examination suggest the presence of malignancy, then sequential imaging, starting with the most appropriate study based on the clues obtained by the clinical evaluation, should be performed. Abnormalities detected by all of the aforementioned imaging studies are not always cancer. Unless overwhelming evidence of metastatic disease is present on an imaging study, in situations in which it will make a difference in treatment, all abnormal scan findings require tissue confirmation of malignancy so that patients are not precluded from having potentially curative surgery.

Lung cancer--where are we today? Current advances in staging and nonsurgical treatment

Lung cancer remains the commonest cause of cancer death in both men and women in the developed world, although mortality rates for men are dropping. Spiral computed tomography (CT) of the chest in middle-aged, smoking subjects may identify two to four times more lung cancers than a chest X-ray, with more than 70% of tumors being Stage I. The incidence of benign nodules is high, making interpretation difficult. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine whether spiral CT detects lung cancer early enough to improve mortality. Preoperative staging has relied on CT scans, but positron emission tomography scanning has greater sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than CT and is recommended as the final confirmatory investigation when the CT shows resectable disease. In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, there is a small advantage for the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, but no advantage for postoperative radiotherapy. Chemotherapy gives no benefit when given as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment around surgery. In advanced disease, newer cytotoxic agents confer a small survival advantage over older combinations, but the advantage in median survival over best supportive care remains a few months with modest improvements in quality of life. Survival with small cell lung cancer has shown little increase over the last 15 years despite multiple attempts to manipulate the timing, dose intensity of chemotherapy, and the potential of radiotherapy. Novel therapies are urgently needed for all cell types of lung cancer.

Effect of emergency department CT on neuroimaging case volume and positive scan rates

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this study to determine the effect a computed tomographic (CT) scanner in the emergency department (ED) has on neuroimaging case volume and positive scan rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The total numbers of ED visits and neuroradiology CT scans requested from the ED were recorded for 1998 and 2000, the years before and after the installation of a CT unit in the ED. For each examination type (brain, face, cervical spine), studies were graded for major findings (those that affected patient care), minor findings, and normal findings. The CT utilization rates and positive study rates were compared for each type of study performed for both years.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in the utilization rate after installation of the CT unit (P < .001). The fractions of studies with major findings, minor findings, and normal findings changed significantly after installation of the CT unit for facial examinations (P = .002) but not for brain (P = .12) or cervical spine (P = .24) examinations. In all types of studies, the percentage of normal examinations increased. In toto, there was a significant decrease in the positive scan rate after installation of the CT scanner (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

After installation of a CT scanner in the ED, there was increased utilization and a decreased rate of positive neuroradiologic examinations, the latter primarily due to lower positive rates for facial CT scans.

Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology

PURPOSE

Cost-utility analyses (CUAs) present the value of an intervention as the ratio of its incremental cost divided by its incremental survival benefit, with survival weighted by utilities to produce quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We critically reviewed the CUA literature and its role in informing clinical oncology practice, research priorities, and policy.

METHODS

The English-language literature was searched between 1975 and1997 for CUAs. Two readers abstracted from each article descriptions of the clinical situation and patients, the methods used, study perspective, the measures of effectiveness, costs included, discounting, and whether sensitivity analyses were performed. The readers then made subjective quality assessments. We also extracted utility values from the reviewed papers, along with information on how and from whom utilities were measured.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 40 studies, which described 263 health states and presented 89 cost-utility ratios. Both the number and quality of studies increased over time. However, many studies are at variance with current standards. Only 20% of studies took a societal perspective, more than a third failed to discount both the costs and QALYs, and utilities were often simply estimates from the investigators or other physicians.

CONCLUSION

The cost-utility literature in oncology is not large but is rapidly expanding. There remains much room for improvement in the methodological rigor with which utilities are measured. Considering quality-of-life effects by incorporating utilities into economic studies is particularly important in oncology, where many therapies obtain modest improvements in response or survival at the expense of nontrivial toxicity.

Diagnosis and staging of lung cancer

Lung cancer is the biggest cancer killer among men and women in the United States. Lung cancer can present in a myriad of ways and the goal of prompt diagnosis and staging requires that the clinician be able to knowledgeably choose from a variety of tools available for such purpose. Review of some of these tools and general strategies with regard to staging is provided. Many new technologies are becoming available and much evaluation needs to be done before their proper roles become well defined. Little has changed with regard to staging of small cell lung cancer in recent years. The International System for Staging Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer was revised for a second time in 1997. Although the revisions have largely corrected the shortcomings of the 1985 version, some controversies persist. Whenever possible, a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis, staging, and therapy should be utilized. This should include incorporating the services of the pulmonologist, the thoracic surgeon, the medical oncologist, the radiologist, the radiation therapist, the pathologist, the respiratory therapist, and the social worker.

Extrathoracic staging is not necessary for non-small-cell lung cancer with clinical stage T1-2 N0

BACKGROUND

In the official guidelines published recently, radiographic staging procedures were not recommended for patients who have non-small-cell lung cancer with negative clinical evaluation.

METHODS

We did a retrospective analysis of 755 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in clinical stage T1-2 N0 between 1982 and 1996. The patients all had a full series of imaging procedures, based on the staging protocol. Their medical records were reviewed with respect to how often distant metastasis was detected by these procedures and whether the patients showed any symptoms and laboratory abnormalities indicating extrathoracic metastasis.

RESULTS

The incidence of distant metastasis detected by the imaging procedures was 2.1% (nine of 419) in T1 N0 cases and 5.4% (18 of 335) in T2 N0 cases. Silent metastasis was found only in 0.5% (2 of 419) of the T1 N0 cases and 0.9% (3 of 335) of the T2 N0 cases. The cost of these staging procedures was approximately one million dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the cost and time savings, staging procedures are not warranted for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage T1-2 N0 with negative clinical evaluations.

Lung cancer staging and management: comparison of contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced helical CT of the thorax

PURPOSE

To determine whether contrast material-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and upper abdomen changes the tumor stage and management compared with nonenhanced helical CT in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 15 months, any patient in whom lung cancer was strongly suspected or newly diagnosed and who was scheduled for thoracic CT was considered eligible for the study. All patients underwent nonenhanced thoracic helical CT from the lung apices through the adrenal glands and then contrast-enhanced thoracic helical CT from the lung apices through the entire liver. Each study was read independently, and the thoracic radiologic stage was determined. Tissue sampling was performed and the final pathologic stage assigned.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients had a final pathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. There was agreement in stage between the nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced examinations in 92 of the 96 patients. In three patients, the tumor stage at nonehanced CT increased at contrast-enhanced CT, from IA to IIA (n = 1), IIB to IV (n = 1), and IIIB to IV (n = 1). In one patient, the tumor stage decreased from IIIB to IIB. There was no substantial change in management of any patient.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that contrast-enhanced thoracic CT through the liver for staging lung cancer rarely changes the tumor stage determined with nonenhanced CT through the adrenal glands and does not substantially influence management decisions.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: practice patterns of extrathoracic imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify practice patterns of extrathoracic imaging in patients newly diagnosed with non-small-cell lung, cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 125 patients (71 men, 54 women; mean age, 67 years) from five hospitals (25 patients each) with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer. Charts were reviewed for cancer cell type, evidence of metastatic disease, and performance and results of extrathoracic imaging, including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain, bone scanning, and abdominal CT.

RESULTS

Of 125 patients, 77 (62%) underwent extrathoracic imaging. These patients included 64 (64%) of 100 patients with clinical symptoms or laboratory signs of metastatic disease and 13 (52%) of 25 patients with no such indications. Extrathoracic imaging did not differ according to cancer cell type: It was performed for 30 (60%) of 50 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 26 (60%) of 43 patients with adenocarcinoma, and 16 (73%) of 22 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer that was not further characterized. Brain CT or MR imaging bone scanning, or abdominal CT were performed in only 48%, 39%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Brain CT or MR images or bone scans revealed metastatic disease in seven of 20 and nine of 22 patients with clinical symptoms or laboratory signs of disease, respectively. These examinations revealed disease in four of 40 and two of 27 patients without such symptoms or signs, respectively (P < .05). No significant differences emerged among the practice patterns at the five participating hospitals.

CONCLUSION

No consensus was found on performance of extrathoracic imaging in patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer.

Detection of brain metastasis in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of CT and MRI

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the usefulness of MRI and CT in the detection of brain metastases during preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up.

DESIGN

A prospective and sequential comparison.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 332 patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer who were free of neurologic signs and symptoms, brain CT was performed preoperatively on 155 patients (CT group) and brain MRI on 177 patients (MRI group). Patient characteristics in both groups were comparable. In 279 patients with complete resection of the primary lung tumor, intensive follow-up with CT and MRI was performed in the respective groups. The preoperative detection of brain metastases, postoperative intracranial recurrence rates, and characteristics of detected brain tumors were compared between the two groups. The survival of patients with brain metastases was also compared.

RESULTS

From the first evaluation to 12 months after surgery for primary lung cancer, brain metastases were observed in 11 patients (7.1%) from the CT group and 12 patients (6.8%) from the MRI group. MRI detected brain metastases preoperatively in 6 of the 12 patients (3.4% of the total MRI group), whereas CT detected brain metastases preoperatively in 1 of the 11 patients (0.6% of the total CT group). MRI showed a tendency toward a higher preoperative detection rate of brain metastases than CT (p = 0.069). Furthermore, the mean (+/- SD) maximal diameter of the brain metastases was significantly smaller in the MRI group (12.8+/-9.1 mm) than in the CT group (20.3+/-7.0 mm) (p = 0.041). However, the median survival time and 2-year survival rate after treatment of detected brain metastases, respectively, were 10 months and 27% in the CT group and 17 months and 28% in the MRI group. There was no significant difference between the groups in survival time.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative evaluation and intensive follow-up with MRI could facilitate early detection of brain metastases in patients with potentially operable lung cancer. However, further studies on detection and treatment of the metastatic tumors are considered necessary.

Economic analyses of radiological procedures: a methodological evaluation of the medical literature

OBJECTIVE

Increasing pressure to curb health care costs has led to considerable interest in economic analyses, including both cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. Numerous economic analyses of radiological procedures have appeared in both the radiology and non-radiology literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of economic analyses of radiological procedures published in the non-radiology medical literature during the years 1990 1995.

METHODS

Original investigations from the medical (non-radiological) literature that include economic analyses of radiological interventions were identified from a computerized literature search. Each economic analysis article was evaluated by two independent reviewers for adherence to ten methodological criteria. The criteria were derived from review of the medical and radiological economic analysis methodology literature and consisted of the following: (1) Comparative options stated; (2) perspective of analysis defined; (3) outcome measure identified; (4) cost data included; (5) source of cost data stated; (6) long term costs included; (7) discounting employed; (8) summary measure provided; (9) incremental computation method used; and (10) sensitivity analysis performed. The results were compared to a previous study that evaluated the radiological literature.

RESULTS

Of the 56 articles in the medical literature that included economic analyses of radiological procedures, only eight (14%) conformed to all ten methodological criteria. The cost data (98%) and comparative options (89%) criteria exhibited high compliance, while the perspective of analysis (25%) and discounting (32%) criteria had relatively low compliance. Agreement between the reviewers was excellent (kappa = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Published economic analyses of radiology procedures usually do not meet accepted methodological standards.

Life-long screening of patients with intermediate-thickness cutaneous melanoma for asymptomatic pulmonary recurrences: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Costs and potential benefits of an intensive chest X-ray (CXR) screening program to detect asymptomatic pulmonary metastases in patients with intermediate-thickness, local, cutaneous melanoma were assessed.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was performed using data on recurrence detection from an historic cohort at Roswell Park Cancer Institute and other published studies, estimates of new cases of melanoma in 1996 from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, and estimates of cost and treatment benefits from published articles retrieved through MEDLINE. Net costs were calculated as the added cost of CXR screening to regular follow-up and the costs incurred in the surgical treatment of lung recurrences. Net benefits were calculated as potential savings in nonquality-adjusted life years (NQALY) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) resulting from surgical treatment. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the present value of net costs divided by net benefits, with benefits presented in discounted and undiscounted forms.

RESULTS

For the base case, cost of screening per NQALY was $150,000 and was $165,000 for QALY in 1996 dollars using undiscounted health benefits. Screening accounted for approximately 80% of program costs and treatment accounted for 20%. Annual cost-effectiveness ratios were lowest in Years 3-10 of screening. The total cost of a 20-year screening program for patients diagnosed in 1996 was estimated to be between $27-$32 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of certain benefits, the model demonstrates that significant cost savings may be possible by decreasing screening frequency in the first 2 years and limiting screening to the first 5-10 years after diagnosis.