Managing asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

[Surgery of aortic regurgitation with reduced left ventricular function]

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement improves clinical symptoms and left ventricular systolic function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation despite a higher surgical risk. The objective of this study is to determine if left ventricular function will be normalized after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This retrospective study included 40 patients (nine females and 31 males) with chronic aortic regurgitation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who were evaluated by echocardiography Doppler. Were included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less or equal to 45%. Ages ranged from 18 to 77 years (mean = 46.4 ± 12.6 years). Preoperatively, six patients (15%) were asymptomatic, ten (25%) were in NYHA II, half (50%) in NYHA III and four (10%) in NYHA IV. The mean preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was 36.2 ± 2%. The mean end systolic and diastolic dimensions were 61.7 ± 8.5 mm and 78.9 ± 9.7 mm respectively. Aortic regurgitation was quantified grade III in sixteen patients (40%) and grade IV in twenty-four (60%).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement and three Bentall operations. Hospital mortality was 7.5% (3/40). The mean follow-up period was 69.7 months. All survivor patients were investigated. Out of these, five were lost and 32 were controlled. Symptomatic improvement was noted in most of the survivors. Sixty percent (24/40) were severely symptomatic before and only 6.25% (2/32) during follow-up. The ejection fraction increased significantly after surgery (36.2 ± 2% in preoperative period vs. 55.2 ± 10% in postoperative period, P < 0.02). Left ventricular diameters decreased significantly also. Survival rates were 3-year 94%, 5-year 91% and 7-year 89%.

CONCLUSION

Despite reduced left ventricular systolic function, aortic valve replacement in chronic aortic regurgitation was associated with acceptable operative risk. Surgery improves functional status, symptoms and ejection fraction in most patients.

Quality of life after aortic valve replacement

Understanding the quality of life after aortic valve replacement has become increasingly important. As aortic valve replacement numbers increase, more patients, physicians and families are affected by the subsequent quality of life. Quality of life information can inform the decision to perform aortic valve replacement and the selection of replacement valve. When reviewing quality of life results, it is important to realize that the findings are affected by the selection and quality of instruments, as many studies have not used valid or reliable instruments. Studies have shown that aortic valve replacement appears to significantly improve the quality of life of survivors, including those older than 70 years of age and even decades after the procedure, quality of life remains high. Studies have suggested that the elderly may gain as much quality of life benefit as younger patients. No consistent differences in resulting total quality of life have been observed between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Only one study showed some quality of life benefits of pulmonary autograft over mechanical valves. It is unclear whether minimally invasive aortic valve replacements confer better quality of life than standard aortic valve replacements. While existing quality of life studies have provided important information, more studies are needed especially as valve technology and operative techniques continue to improve. Future studies should endeavor to use validated general and disease-specific instruments and quantify the effects of demographics, preoperative clinical conditions and intraoperative variables on quality of life outcomes.

Prognostic value of preoperative indexed end-systolic left ventricle diameter in the outcome after surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

End-systolic diameter (ESD) is an important parameter in the prognosis and indication for surgery in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). It has been suggested that ESD values noncorrected for body surface area (BSA) could be inappropriate in the management of patients with extreme BSA. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of indexed ESD (IESD) of the left ventricle in the management of patients with severe isolated chronic AR.

METHODS

One hundred forty-seven patients underwent surgery for chronic AR and were followed up for a mean of 8 +/- 6 years (1-22 years). A post hoc assessment was made of the prognostic value of preoperative ESD and IESD in different BSA percentiles: group 1, <or= 25th percentile (BSA 1.43-1.68 m(2), n = 40); group 2, >25th percentile and <or=75th percentile (BSA 1.69-1.91 m(2), n = 68); and group 3, >75th percentile (BSA 1.92-2.24 m(2), n = 39).

RESULTS

Age-adjusted preoperative ESD and IESD were independent predictors of mortality or heart failure in the entire population. Magnitude of the relative risk was slightly greater using preoperative IESD than ESD (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.29, P = .017; HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P = .016). In group 1, the age-adjusted expected mortality rate would drop if IESD of 25 mm/m(2) was used as a surgical criterion instead of ESD 50 mm, from 37.94% to 24.27% at 10 years (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IESD improves the prediction of unfavorable outcomes after surgery in patients with low BSA but not in those with high BSA. In patients with low BSA, IESD >or=25 mm/m(2) should be used as a cutoff point for surgery rather than ESD >50 mm.

Role of vasodilators in regurgitant valve disease

Vasodilator therapy is designed to reduce regurgitant volume and improve left ventricular function. Acute administration reduces vascular resistance and decreases regurgitant volume and left ventricular filling pressure. These effects may be clinically useful in acute regurgitations, but less consistent results have been reported in long-term therapy. In chronic mitral functional regurgitation, vasodilator therapy has proved to have clinical or prognostic benefit only when heart failure or poor ventricular function is present. The indication of vasodilator treatment in aortic regurgitation has raised significant controversy. Several studies with small series have shown beneficial effects on regurgitant volume, ejection fraction, and mass of the left ventricle. Nevertheless, in the only two randomized long-term follow-up studies, results differed completely. In our experience, both nifedipine and enalapril failed to reduce the need for valvular surgery or show benefits in echocardiographic parameters. Vasodilator therapy would be indicated only in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and systemic hypertension, or when surgery is contraindicated.

Left Ventricular Wall Stress in Patients With Severe Aortic Insufficiency With Finite Element Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) with preserved left ventricular (LV) function may be associated with a long asymptomatic period and unpredictable course on medical therapy. Since myocardial wall stress is closely related to both pathologic cardiac remodeling and ultimately to LV decompensation, a more accurate description of regional wall stress may improve our ability to appropriately manage these patients. The objective of this study was to define differences in instantaneous global and regional three-dimensional end-systolic maximum principal stress (ESS) between normal patients and patients with AI, both before and after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 20 normal volunteers and 14 patients with moderate to severe AI with normal systolic function (ejection fraction: 57 +/- 0.6) before and after AVR. Finite element analysis was utilized to estimate global and regional ESS.

RESULTS

Both global (p < 0.001) and regional (p < 0.001 in all segments) ESS were significantly higher in the preoperative AI patients when compared with their postoperative values and normal controls. Postoperative ESS was significantly lower than the normal controls (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional regional and global end-systolic LV wall stress can be determined by MRI and finite element analysis. Values of ESS in patients with chronic AI were elevated prior to AVR and normalized after AVR. This method may have considerable potential as a noninvasive, clinically applicable index of regional LV geometry and function that may help with the serial evaluation of patients with AI.

Long-Term Outcome of Surgically Treated Aortic Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcome in two groups of patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation (AR): those operated on early and those operated on late according to the guidelines.

BACKGROUND

The impact of earlier surgery for chronic severe AR as defined in guidelines has not been evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 170 patients with chronic severe AR submitted to aortic valve replacement were prospectively followed up. Patients were divided in two groups depending on the clinical situation at the time of surgery. Group A were 60 patients who were operated on following guidelines advice of earlier surgery, and group B were 110 patients who were operated on late with regard to guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

Follow-up was 10 +/- 6 years (1 to 22 years). During follow-up 44 patients died, 7 patients (12%) from group A and 37 (37%) from group B (p = 0.001). The cause of death was non-cardiac in 11 patients, 2 (3%) in group A and 9 (8%) in group B. Cardiac deaths occurred in 33 patients, 5 (9%) from group A and 28 (28%) from group B (p = 0.002). Causes of death differed between groups A and B: heart failure or sudden death were significantly more frequent in group B (20 patients vs. 1 patient, p = 0.001). Overall survival in groups A and B was 90 +/- 4% vs. 75 +/- 8% at 5 years, 86 +/- 5% vs. 64 +/- 5% at 10 years, and 78 +/- 7% vs. 53 +/- 6% at 15 years, respectively (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Early operation as defined in the guidelines improves long-term survival in patients with chronic AR.

Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy can reduce the left ventricular volume and mass and improve left ventricular performance in patients with aortic regurgitation. Accordingly, it has been suggested that such therapy may reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 95 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function to receive open-label nifedipine (20 mg every 12 hours), open-label enalapril (20 mg per day), or no treatment (control group) to identify the possible beneficial effects of vasodilator therapy on left ventricular function and the need for aortic-valve replacement.

RESULTS

After a mean of seven years of follow-up, the rate of aortic-valve replacement was similar among the groups: 39 percent in the control group, 50 percent in the enalapril group, and 41 percent in the nifedipine group (P=0.62). In addition, there were no significant differences among the groups in aortic regurgitant volume, left ventricular size, left ventricular mass, mean wall stress, or ejection fraction. One year after valve replacement, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter had decreased to a similar degree among the patients who underwent surgery in each of the three groups, and all the patients had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine or enalapril did not reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, such therapy did not reduce the aortic regurgitant volume, decrease the size of the left ventricle, or improve left ventricular function.

Severe aortic insufficiency and normal systolic function: determining regional left ventricular wall stress by finite-element analysis

BACKGROUND

Because severe aortic insufficiency in the setting of preserved left ventricular function is often associated with a long asymptomatic period and unpredictable course on medical therapy, sensitive indices of left ventricular systolic performance are necessary for the optimal direction of therapeutic intervention. Because myocardial wall stress is closely related to both pathologic cardiac remodeling and ultimately to left ventricular decompensation, an accurate description of regional wall stress distribution may improve our ability to clinically manage these patients appropriately. The objectives of this study were (1) to define sensitive, noninvasive indices of left ventricular systolic performance to assist the clinician in the serial evaluation and early detection of increased left ventricular wall stress and, therefore, inadequate left ventricular remodeling and subsequent myocardial decompensation of patients with aortic insufficiency, and (2) to quantify differences in instantaneous global and regional end-systolic wall stress between normal subjects and patients.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 23 normal volunteers and 19 patients with aortic insufficiency and normal systolic function (ejection fraction, 57% +/- 6%). Finite-element analysis was used to estimate global and regional end-systolic stress.

RESULTS

End-systolic stress was significantly higher in the patient group globally (154,700 +/- 31,711 versus 96,781 +/- 23,185 dyne/cm(2); p < 0.001) and regionally (p < 0.001 in all segments) despite normal systolic function and similar end-systolic pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

End-systolic stress as determined by magnetic resonance imaging and finite-element analysis may have considerable potential as a noninvasive, clinically applicable index of regional left ventricular function that may help in the serial evaluation, optimal management, and early identification of left ventricular decompensation in patients with aortic insufficiency.

Afterload reduction in severe aortic regurgitation

This study was designed to assess the effects of afterload reduction in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and maintained LV function by cine-MRI. We studied 13 patients at baseline and after 0.2 mg/kg Hydralazine (I.V.). Patients were stratified according to the volumetric LV response to acute afterload reduction: Group I comprised patients with improved LV response; Group II comprised patients with unchanged or deteriorated LV response. Baseline LV function and severity of AR were not significantly different between groups. However, regurgitant fraction decreased (50 +/- 12 vs. 36 +/- 9%; P < 0.03) and cardiac output increased (4.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.6l/minute; P < 0,001) in Group I and remained unchanged in Group II (54 +/- 10 vs. 55 +/- 10%, P = n.s. and 5.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.9l/minute; P = n.s.) during maximal vasodilation. Beat-to-beat analysis revealed a decrease of left ventricular endsystolic volume index in group I (48 +/- 13 vs. 37 +/- 9 ml/beat; P < 0.05) and no change in group II (61 +/- 20 vs. 62 +/- 20 ml/beat; P = n.s.). In the natural history of chronic AR, the absence of improved LV performance during acute vasodilation using beat-to-beat analysis by MRI may identify patients with more advanced cardiac adaptation to chronic volume overload.

Chronic aortic regurgitation. Role of medical therapy and optimal timing for surgery

Aortic valve replacement should be performed once significant symptoms develop. Lacking important symptoms, operation should also be performed in patients with aortic regurgitation who manifest consistent and reproducible evidence of either LV contractile dysfunction at rest or extreme LV dilation. Noninvasive imaging techniques should play a major role in this evaluation. An important clinical decision, such as recommending aortic valve replacement in the asymptomatic patient, should not be based on a single echocardiographic or radionuclide angiographic measurement alone. When these data consistently indicate impaired contractile function at rest or extreme LV dilation on repeat measurements, however, operation is indicated in the asymptomatic patient. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of irreversible LV dysfunction in these patients and enhance long-term postoperative survival.