Teixeira da Cunha-Filho I, Henson H, Qureshy H, Williams AL, Holmes SA, Protas EJ. Differential responses to measures of gait performance among healthy and neurologically impaired individuals11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;
84:1774-9. [PMID:
14669182 DOI:
10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00373-3]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To compare gait during a 5-minute walk among healthy individuals, persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and stroke survivors and to investigate whether simultaneous measures of oxygen consumption enhance information about performance.
DESIGN
Descriptive study.
SETTING
Veterans Affairs medical center.
PARTICIPANTS
Thirty-nine healthy individuals, 10 persons with SCI, and 20 stroke survivors.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were fitted with a portable gas analyzer and walked on a 5-m walkway for 5 minutes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Measures of walk distance, gait speed, gait energy expenditure (GEE), and gait cost were obtained, along with measures of ventilation (.Ve), ventilation and carbon dioxide production slope (.Ve . .VCo2), oxygen pulse, and heart rate.
RESULTS
The SCI group (127.65+/-81.74m) walked less than the stroke survivors (148.80+/-64.3m) or the healthy group (268.90+/-35.01m) but had higher energy demands, as shown by GEE (SCI group, 13.28+/-3.23mL.kg(-1).min(-1); stroke group, 10.18+/-2.14mL.kg(-1).min(-1); healthy group, 9.61+/-1.90mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and by gait cost (SCI group,.57+/-.40 mL.kg(-1).m(-1); stroke group,.40+/-.52mL.kg(-1).m(-1); healthy group,.18+/-.02mL.kg(-1).m(-1)). Compared with the healthy group, the stroke group had higher .Ve (stroke group, 22.34+/-5.20L/min vs healthy group, 16.11+/-3.22L/min) and .Ve . .VCo2 slope (24.22+/-8.80 vs 18.73+/-5.44, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Use of metabolic assessment during the 5-minute walk was feasible and provided further information for evaluating gait performance with the subjects studied.
Collapse