Estrogen acutely abolishes abnormal cold-induced coronary constriction in men

Estrogen-mediated mechanisms in hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally for men and women. Premenopausal women have a lower incidence of hypertension and other cardiovascular events than men of the same age, but diminished sex differences after menopause implicates 17-beta-estradiol (E2) as a protective agent. The cardioprotective effects of E2 are mediated by nuclear estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) and a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER). This review summarizes both established as well as emerging estrogen-mediated mechanisms that underlie sex differences in the vasculature during hypertension and CVD. In addition, remaining knowledge gaps inherent in the association of sex differences and E2 are identified, which may guide future clinical trials and experimental studies in this field.

Estrogens and Coronary Artery Disease: New Clinical Perspectives

In premenopausal women, endogenous estrogens are associated with reduced prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Clinical trials conducted in the 1990s such as HERS, WHI, and WISDOM have shown that postmenopausal treatment with horse hormone mixtures (so-called conjugated equine estrogens) and synthetic progestins adversely affects female cardiovascular health. Our understanding of rapid (nongenomic) and chronic (genomic) estrogen signaling has since advanced considerably, including identification of a new G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), which like the "classical" receptors ERα and ERβ is highly abundant in the cardiovascular system. Here, we discuss the role of estrogen receptors in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and review natural and synthetic ligands of estrogen receptors as well as their effects in physiology, on cardiovascular risk factors, and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Data from preclinical and clinical studies using nonselective compounds activating GPER, which include selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen or raloxifene, selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as Faslodex™ (fulvestrant/ICI 182,780), vitamin B3 (niacin), green tea catechins, and soy flavonoids such as genistein or resveratrol, strongly suggest that activation of GPER may afford therapeutic benefit for primary and secondary prevention in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Evidence from preclinical studies suggest similar efficacy profiles for selective small molecule GPER agonists such as G-1 which are devoid of uterotrophic activity. Further clinical research in this area is warranted to provide opportunities for future cardiovascular drug development.

Central estrogen inhibition of angiotensin II-induced hypertension in male mice and the role of reactive oxygen species

It has been shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to the central effect of ANG II on blood pressure (BP). Recent studies have implicated an antihypertensive action of estrogen in ANG II-infused female mice. The present study used in vivo telemetry recording and in vitro living mouse brain slices to test the hypothesis that the central activation of estrogen receptors in male mice inhibits ANG II-induced hypertension via the modulation of the central ROS production. In male wild-type mice, the systemic infusion of ANG II induced a significant increase in BP (Delta30.1 +/- 2.5 mmHg). Either central infusion of Tempol or 17beta-estradiol (E2) attenuated the pressor effect of ANG II (Delta10.9 +/- 2.3 and Delta4.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg), and the protective effect of E2 was prevented by the coadministration of an estrogen receptor, antagonist ICI-182780 (Delta23.6 +/- 3.1 mmHg). Moreover, the ganglionic blockade on day 7 after the start of ANG II infusions resulted in a smaller reduction of BP in central Tempol- and in central E2-treated males, suggesting that estrogen inhibits the central ANG II-induced increases in sympathetic outflow. In subfornical organ slices, the application of ANG II resulted in a 21.5 +/- 2.5% increase in ROS production. The coadministration of irbesartan, an ANG II type 1 receptor antagonist, or the preincubation of brain slices with Tempol blocked ANG II-induced increases in ROS production (-1.8 +/- 1.6% and -1.0 +/- 1.8%). The ROS response to ANG II was also blocked by E2 (-3.2 +/- 2.4%). The results suggest that the central actions of E2 are involved in the protection from ANG II-induced hypertension and that estrogen modulation of the ANG II-induced effects may involve interactions with ROS production.

Oestrogen increases myocardial blood flow in men: assessment by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVES

Oestrogen has been shown to increase nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation and modulate sympathetic tone in postmenopausal women. We investigated the acute effects of oestrogen on the coronary microcirculation in men.

METHODS

Myocardial blood flow was quantified using N-ammonia positron emission tomography before and 20 min after an intravenous administration of conjugated oestrogen (10 mg) in nine healthy men.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in either systemic blood pressure or heart rate before and after oestrogen infusion. However, myocardial blood flow was increased by oestrogen from 0.88 +/-0.06 to 1.05+/-0.09 ml x g x min (P<0.05). Although serum levels of nitrite/nitrate (end products of nitric oxide) were not increased, circulating norepinephrine (noradrenaline) levels were decreased after the administration of oestrogen from 401+/-114 to 346+/-112 pg x ml (P<0.01). A significant negative correlation was found between myocardial blood flow and plasma norepinephrine levels (r=-0.67, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A single administration of oestrogen enhanced myocardial circulation in healthy men. The oestrogen-induced increase in myocardial blood flow may be due to direct effects on the coronary circulation or through the modulation of norepinephrine levels, rather than the production of nitric oxide.

Estrogen modulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Over the past decade, clinical and basic research has demonstrated that estrogen has a dramatic impact on the response to vascular injury and the development of atherosclerosis. Further work has indicated that this is at least partially mediated by an enhancement in nitric oxide (NO) production by the endothelial isoform of NO synthase (eNOS) due to increases in both eNOS expression and level of activation. The effects on eNOS abundance are primarily mediated at the level of gene transcription, and they are dependent on estrogen receptors (ERs), which classically serve as transcription factors, but they are independent of estrogen response element action. Estrogen also has potent nongenomic effects on eNOS activity mediated by a subpopulation of ERalpha localized to caveolae in endothelial cells, where they are coupled to eNOS in a functional signaling module. These observations, which emphasize dependence on cell surface-associated receptors, provide evidence for the existence of a steroid receptor fast-action complex, or SRFC, in caveolae. Estrogen binding to ERalpha on the SRFC in caveolae leads to G(alphai) activation, which mediates downstream events. The downstream signaling includes activation of tyrosine kinase-MAPK and Akt/protein kinase B signaling, stimulation of heat shock protein 90 binding to eNOS, and perturbation of the local calcium environment, leading to eNOS phosphorylation and calmodulin-mediated eNOS stimulation. These unique genomic and nongenomic processes are critical to the vasoprotective and atheroprotective characteristics of estrogen. In addition, they serve as excellent paradigms for further elucidation of novel mechanisms of steroid hormone action.

Regional differences in the effect of oestrogen on vascular tone in isolated rabbit arteries

The aim of the study was to assess how oestrogen acutely affects the tone of isolated artery segments from different vascular beds in rabbit. Cumulative concentrations of 17beta-oestradiol were added to ring segments of thoracic aorta, pulmonary artery, ear artery and coronary arteries from adult male rabbits. Coronary arteries precontracted with potassium or the thromboxane agonist, U46619, relaxed to oestrogen (10(-7) to 10(-4) M), whereas oestrogen (10(-8) to 10(-4) M) only caused additional contraction in segments of thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery precontracted with phenylephrine. In the thoracic aorta both the phospholipase C inhibitor NCDC (10(-4) M) and the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10(-5) M) almost completely blocked the contractile effect of oestrogen. In segments of the ear artery, oestrogen caused relaxation only at higher concentrations of oestrogen (10(-5) to 10(-4) M). In conclusion, oestrogen may cause both relaxation and vasoconstriction in different vascular beds, and in the thoracic aorta the contractile effects of oestrogen may be mediated via inositol phosphate-dependent pathways and release of prostaglandins.

Effects of acute hormone therapy on recurrent ischemia in postmenopausal women with unstable angina

OBJECTIVES

We tested whether acute hormone therapy reduces ambulatory electrocardiographic ischemia in postmenopausal (PMP) women with unstable angina (UA).

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of UA. Acute estrogen administration improves endothelial function in PMP women with coronary artery disease and increases coronary artery blood flow.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-three PMP women with UA (mean age 69.7 years), treated with standard anti-ischemic therapy, were enrolled within 24 h of symptom onset. In a double-blind fashion, subjects were randomized to receive intravenous followed by oral conjugated estrogen for 21 days, intravenous estrogen followed by oral conjugated estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone for 21 days or placebo. The primary end point was the number of ambulatory electrocardiographic ischemic events over the first 48 h. Clinical events were also determined over six months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Electrocardiographic ischemia did not differ among the three randomized groups. The mean number of ischemic events per patient over 48 h was 0.74 for estrogen, 0.86 for estrogen plus progesterone and 0.74 for the placebo groups (p = 0.87). The percentage of patients with ischemic events and the mean duration of ischemia did not differ between hormone- and placebo-treated patients. In-hospital and six-month rates of adverse clinical events were also similar among the three randomized groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute hormone therapy does not reduce ischemia in PMP women with UA when added to standard anti-ischemic therapy.

Low-dose estrogen supplementation improves vascular function in hypogonadal men

It is widely accepted that in women, estrogens provide protection against the development of cardiovascular disease. However, the cardiovascular role of estrogens in men remains uncertain, despite preliminary evidence that endogenous estrogens produced by aromatization of androgenic precursors are of physiological importance. Hypogonadal men have very low levels of circulating estrogen. We studied the responsiveness of forearm resistance arteries to vasoconstrictor and vasodilator agents in 12 men (mean+/-SEM age, 68.7+/-2.6 years) rendered hypogonadal as a result of treatment for prostatic cancer, before and after 8 weeks of estrogen supplementation (estradiol valerate 1 mg daily; n=7) or placebo (n=5). Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, and vasoactive agents were infused through a brachial artery cannula in doses that did not affect blood pressure or heart rate. Estrogen supplementation was well tolerated, with no adverse effects. After estrogen treatment, mean estradiol levels increased from <30 to 308+/-65 pmol/L, and both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced. HDL cholesterol levels increased significantly, and vasoconstrictor responses to the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (1, 2, 4 micromol/min) were enhanced. Vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II (8, 16, 32 ng/min) were markedly attenuated by estrogen treatment, as were vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine (25, 50, 100 ng/min). Estrogen did not alter the vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (9.25, 18.5, 37 microgram/min) or to the endothelium-independent agent sodium nitroprusside (1.6 microgram/min). Responses to all vasoactive agents were unchanged after administration of placebo. We conclude that low-dose estrogen supplementation in hypogonadal men is well tolerated, lowers blood pressure, and may affect vascular reactivity in a manner that is potentially beneficial, through several mechanisms, including enhancement of basal NO release and attenuation of vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine. These findings suggest the need to consider a possible clinical role for estrogenic compounds in cardiovascular risk reduction in some groups of men.

Postmenopausal oestrogen replacement therapy and atherosclerosis: can current compounds provide cardiovascular protection?

The natural oestrogen, 17 beta-oestradiol, has been implicated in protection from atherosclerosis, a chronic systemic vascular disease with an inflammatory component accounting for the majority of morbidity and mortality in Western countries. Despite the protective effects of 17 beta-oestradiol in premenopausal women and experimental evidence demonstrating inhibitory effects of oestrogen on atherosclerosis progression, it is currently unclear whether hormone replacement therapy can affect cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women. The recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of oestrogen action demonstrated roles for different oestrogen receptors and oestrogen metabolites in the pathogenesis of vascular injury and endothelial cell dysfunction. However, their respective role in the process of atherogenesis remains yet to be elucidated. Moreover, the availability of novel drugs with tissue- and/or receptor-specific actions will help to understand the role of oestrogen in cardiovascular diseases. Several ongoing large-scale clinical trials using opposed or unopposed replacement therapy with natural or synthetic oestrogens, or selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) will resolve the question whether the drugs currently available have therapeutic potential to interfere with the progression of atherosclerosis and its complications.

Oestradiol improves arterial endothelial function in healthy men receiving testosterone

OBJECTIVE

To assess prospectively the effects of low dose oestradiol on arterial endothelial and smooth muscle function in healthy men. Oestrogen use is associated with reduced cardiovascular disease in oestrogen-deficient women, however, the vascular effects of low-dose oestradiol in healthy men have not been investigated previously.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Twenty-three men (aged 32 +/- 8 years) were randomized to receive depot implants of testosterone (T) alone (group 1, n = 10), or T with either 10 mg (group 2, n = 7) or 20 mg (group 3, n = 6) of oestradiol (E).

MEASUREMENTS

Hormone levels, lipids and vascular reactivity were measured before, 1 month and 6 months after hormone implantation. Using high-resolution ultrasound, brachial artery diameter was measured at rest, during reactive hyperaemia (leading to flow-mediated dilatation, FMD, which is endothelium-dependent) and after sublingual nitroglycerin (GTN, an endothelium-independent dilator).

RESULTS

Oestradiol produced a dose-dependent increase in plasma oestradiol (at 1 month 96 +/- 7, 149 +/- 6, 192 +/- 23 pmol/l in the 3 groups, respectively, P < 0.001 by ANOVA for trend). Minor side-effects (gynaecomastia, nipple tenderness) indicated that 20 mg oestradiol was the maximum tolerated dose. There was also a dose-dependent increase in FMD with oestradiol dose: at 1 month, - 0.2, + 0.2 and + 1.8% for groups 1-3, respectively (P = 0.31 by ANOVA for trend); and at 6 months, - 0.8, + 0.4 and + 2.2% (P = 0.02). The rise in oestradiol levels following treatment correlated with the improvement in FMD (P = 0.01). GTN responses were similar in the 3 groups throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

In healthy young men, oestradiol supplementation is associated with enhanced arterial endothelial function, a key marker of vascular health.

Delayed graft function influences renal function, but not survival

BACKGROUND

In renal transplantation, the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on prognosis is controversial. We analyzed the risk factors of DGF and its impact on graft function and prognosis.

METHODS

Seven hundred thirty-four cadaveric renal transplants performed between 1983 and 1997 were analyzed. DGF was diagnosed when serum creatinine levels increased, remained unchanged, or decreased less than 10% per day in three consecutive days in the first week after transplantation. Creatinine clearances of more or less than 50 or 30 mL/min at one year were used as cut-off points for optimal and suboptimal graft function, respectively. The logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factor related to DGF and renal function one year after transplantation. The Cox regression model was used to examine the influence of DGF on long-term graft survival.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for DGF: recipient pretransplantation mean arterial blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg (OR = 2.08, 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.03), female donor to male recipient combination (OR = 1.55, 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.35), donor age of more than 50 years (OR = 2.21, 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.26), cold ischemia time of more than 28 hours (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.63), and peak panel reactive antibodies of more than 50% (OR = 1.7, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.55). The incidence of DGF was one of the independent risk factors for suboptimal graft function at one year (OR = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.48), together with donor age of more than 50 years (OR = 2.39, 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.57), female donor gender (OR = 1.99, 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.78), the occurrence of acute rejection episodes (OR = 2.66, 95% CI, 1.87 to 3.78), peak panel-reactive antibodies of more than 50% (OR = 1.67, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.47), and sharing of 1 to 3 versus 4 to 8 cross-reactive antigens groups (OR = 1.65, 95% CI, 1.09 to 2. 49). Moreover, DGF was one of the two independent risk factors for acute rejection episodes, but it had no independent effect on graft survival.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors for DGF were identified, of which a low recipient pretransplant mean arterial blood pressure, the transplantation of kidneys from female donors to male recipients, and a prolonged cold ischemia time are potentially avoidable. Although DGF is one of the several risk factors of acute rejection and suboptimal function at one year, it is not independently associated with an increased rate of graft loss.

Ovarian hormones in man: their effects on resting vascular tone, angiotensin converting enzyme activity and angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction

AIMS

Oestrogens in women have been shown to cause vasodilation which may reflect alterations in the activity of vascular angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and/or sensitivity to angiotensin II. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ovarian hormones on vascular tone, vascular ACE activity and vasoconstriction to angiotensin II in males.

METHODS

Eight volunteers were randomised in a crossover design to oestradiol, medroxy-progesterone, and placebo. Vasoconstriction to angiotensin I and angiotensin II was assessed by forearm plethysmography.

RESULTS

Although baseline forearm flow was increased with oestradiol, suggesting generalized vasodilation, there were no changes in the vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin I or angiotensin II. Medroxy-progesterone affected neither baseline flow nor vasoconstrictor responses. The results expressed as percentage reduction in flow (mean +/- s.d.) were: angiotensin I 48 pmol ml-1: placebo -48 +/- 14%; oestradiol -42 +/- 16%; medroxyprogesterone -43 +/- 8% and for angiotensin II 16 pmol ml-1: placebo -42 +/- 10%; oestradiol -39 +/- 11%; medroxyprogesterone -46 +/- 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute administration of oestradiol caused vasodilation in males, the effect was not due to alterations in vascular ACE activity or to altered sensitivity to angiotensin II.