Management of acute exacerbations of COPD: a summary and appraisal of published evidence

[Translated article] Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021 Update. Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD Exacerbation Syndrome

This article details the GesEPOC 2021 recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbation syndrome (CES). The guidelines propose a definition-based syndromic approach, a new classification of severity, and the recognition of different treatable traits (TT), representing a new step toward personalized medicine. The evidence is evaluated using GRADE methodology, with the incorporation of 6 new PICO questions. The diagnostic process comprises four stages: 1) establish a diagnosis of CES, 2) assess the severity of the episode, 3) identify the trigger, and 4) address TTs. This diagnostic process differentiates an outpatient approach, that recommends the inclusion of a basic battery of tests, from a more comprehensive hospital approach, that includes the study of different biomarkers and imaging tests. Bronchodilator treatment for immediate relief of symptoms is considered essential for all patients, while the use of antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, oxygen therapy, and assisted ventilation and the treatment of comorbidities will vary depending on severity and possible TTs. The use of antibiotics will be indicated particularly if sputum color changes, when ventilatory assistance is required, in cases involving pneumonia, and in patients with elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 20 mg/L). Systemic corticosteroids are recommended in CES that requires admission and are suggested in moderate CES. These drugs are more effective in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/mm3. Acute-phase non-invasive mechanical ventilation is specified primarily for patients with CES who develop respiratory acidosis despite initial treatment.

Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021 Update Diagnosis and Treatment af COPD Exacerbation Syndrome

This article details the GesEPOC 2021 recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbation syndrome (CES). The guidelines propose a definition-based syndromic approach, a new classification of severity, and the recognition of different treatable traits (TT), representing a new step toward personalized medicine. The evidence is evaluated using GRADE methodology, with the incorporation of 6 new PICO questions. The diagnostic process comprises four stages: 1) establish a diagnosis of CES, 2) assess the severity of the episode, 3) identify the trigger, and 4) address TTs. This diagnostic process differentiates an outpatient approach, that recommends the inclusion of a basic battery of tests, from a more comprehensive hospital approach, that includes the study of different biomarkers and imaging tests. Bronchodilator treatment for immediate relief of symptoms is considered essential for all patients, while the use of antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, oxygen therapy, and assisted ventilation and the treatment of comorbidities will vary depending on severity and possible TTs. The use of antibiotics will be indicated particularly if sputum color changes, when ventilatory assistance is required, in cases involving pneumonia, and in patients with elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 20 mg/L). Systemic corticosteroids are recommended in CES that requires admission and are suggested in moderate CES. These drugs are more effective in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/mm³. Acute-phase non-invasive mechanical ventilation is specified primarily for patients with CES who develop respiratory acidosis despite initial treatment.

Quality of Care Delivered to Veterans with COPD Exacerbation and the Association with 30-Day Readmission and Death

Quality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care is thought to be an important intermediate process to improve the well-being of patients admitted to hospital for exacerbation. We sought to examine the quality of inpatient COPD care and the associations with readmission and mortality. We performed a cohort study of 2,364 veterans aged over 40 and hospitalized for COPD between 2005 and 2011 at five Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. We examined whether patients received six guideline recommended care items including short-acting bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics, positive-pressure ventilation (in cases of acute hypercarbic respiratory failure), chest imaging, and arterial blood gas measurement. Our primary outcome was all-cause hospital readmission or death within 30 days. Overall quality of care was not significantly associated with readmission or death (acute care aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.87-1.11; ICU aOR 0.89; 95% CI 0.71-1.13). Delivery of corticosteroids and antibiotics was associated with reduced odds of readmission and death (aOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Few patients received all of the recommended care items (18% of acute care, 38% of ICU patients). Quality of care did not vary by race or sex but did vary significantly across sites and did not improve over time. Our composite measure of COPD care quality was not associated with readmission or death. Further efforts are needed to improve care delivery to patients hospitalized with COPD.

Outcome Measures Used in Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results about the effects of community-based pulmonary rehabilitation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) exist, possibly because the variety of outcome measures used and the lack of appropriate measurement properties hinder the development of pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify and review the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinical outcome measures of AECOPD that are used in pulmonary rehabilitation and that can be easily applied in a community setting.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched up to July 1, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Phase 1 identified outcome measures used in pulmonary rehabilitation for AECOPD. Phase 2 reviewed the measurement properties of the identified outcome measures.

DATA EXTRACTION

One reviewer extracted the data and 2 reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and the measurement properties of the outcome measures by using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-three PROMs and 18 clinical outcome measures were found. The outcome measures most used were the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (n = 15/37 studies) and the 6-minute walk test (n = 21/37 studies). Thirty-two studies described the measurement properties of 22 PROMs and 7 clinical outcome measures. The methodological quality of the studies was mostly poor, and the measurement properties were mostly indeterminate. The outcome measure exhibiting more robust properties was the COPD Assessment Test.

LIMITATIONS

A Number of studies were not found with the validated search strategy used and were included a posteriori; the fact that 3 studies presented combined results- for patients who were stable and patients with exacerbation-affected the conclusions that can be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

A Large variety of outcome measures have been used; however, studies on their measurement properties are needed to enhance the understanding of community pulmonary rehabilitation for AECOPD.

Do not do in COPD: consensus statement on overuse

Background

To identify practices that do not add value, cause harm, or subject patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a level of risk that outweighs possible benefits (overuse).

Methods

A qualitative approach was applied. First, a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals used the Metaplan technique to draft and rank a list of overused procedures as well as self-care practices in patients with stable and exacerbated COPD. Second, in successive consensus-building rounds, description files were created for each "do not do" (DND) recommendation, consisting of a definition, description, quality of supporting evidence for the recommendation, and the indicator used to measure the degree of overuse. The consensus group comprised 6 pulmonologists, 2 general practitioners, 1 nurse, and 1 physiotherapist.

Results

In total, 16 DND recommendations were made for patients with COPD: 6 for stable COPD, 6 for exacerbated COPD, and 4 concerning self-care.

Conclusion

Overuse poses a risk for patients and jeopardizes care quality. These 16 DND recommendations for COPD will lower care risks and improve disease management, facilitate communication between physicians and patients, and bolster patient ability to provide self-care.

Comparison of Pathogen Eradication Rate and Safety of Anti-Bacterial Agents for Bronchitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

A large number of population in both developing and developed countries are affected by bronchitis, among all the factors, bacterial infection was considered as a critical cause of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Although several anti-bacterial agents were proved to have the effect of alleviating bronchitis, their relative efficacies and potential side effects remained not clear. We are keen to compare the pathogen eradication rate and safety of anti-bacterial agents for bronchitis. Relevant studies were searched in multiple sources and data were extracted from eligible studies. Then conventional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to determine the relative efficacy and safety of bronchitis medications. The efficacy of bronchitis medications was determined by using the outcome of pathogen eradication, including total pathogen eradication, pathogen eradication of Haemophilus influenzae, pathogen eradication of Moraxella catarrhalis, and pathogen eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae. In addition, safety was assessed by using the outcome of adverse effects and diarrhoea. A 27 RCTs with 9,414 participants were included in the study. Among the medications, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin exhibited better performance than clarithromycin with respect to pathogen eradication of H. influenzae (OR = 21.37, CI: 1.22-541.28; OR = 7.43, CI: 1.79-30.50). Clarithromycin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and telithromycin appeared to be more preferable than amoxicillin + clavulanate and azithromycin with respect to diarrhoea (all OR <1). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) results suggested that gemifloxacin and levofloxacin had a relatively high ranking in total pathogen eradication, whereas amoxicillin + clavulanate and azithromycin exhibited relatively lower ranking with respect to adverse effects and diarrhoea. Gemifloxacin and levofloxacin are more preferable than others for lowering respiratory tract inflammation and infections considering their balanced performance between pathogen eradication and adverse effects. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 3171-3183, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients requiring hospital admission to treat eosinophilic and neutrophilic exacerbations of COPD

PURPOSE

We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with eosinophilic and neutrophilic COPD exacerbations requiring hospital admission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study performed between January 2010 and December 2014. In all, 1,688 COPD patients admitted via the outpatient clinics or emergency departments of six university hospitals were enrolled. The patients were grouped by complete blood counts: eosinophilic group, >2% peripheral blood eosinophils, and neutrophilic group, >65% peripheral blood neutrophils or >11,000 leukocytes/mL. The patients with radiographic evidence of pneumonia at the time of admission, those with lung cancer, those admitted for treatment of other medical problems, and those who chronically used steroids were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 605 patients hospitalized with COPD exacerbations (177 eosinophilic and 380 neutrophilic) were included. Pulmonary functions, including the forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity, were better in patients with eosinophilic exacerbations. Treatment outcomes, including the rate of admission to the intensive care unit and mortality, were poorer in patients with neutrophilic exacerbations (4.5% vs 12.4%, P=0.004; 1.1% vs 4.5%, P=0.043, respectively). Congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] =3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-9.01) and neutrophilic exacerbation (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.21-6.52) were independent risk factors for intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSION

COPD patients with neutrophilic exacerbations experienced worse clinical outcomes than did those with eosinophilic exacerbations. The peripheral blood eosinophil count may be a useful predictor of clinical progress during hospitalization of COPD patients with acute exacerbations.

Is there a role for airway clearance techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Chronic cough and sputum production are common featuresof chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and havea significant impact on exacerbation frequency and qualityof life. Despite this, techniques to assist with removal of sputum from the airway do not have a well-defined role in COPD management. Clinical trials of airway clearance techniques (ACTs) in COPD have shown mixed results with little evidence of long-term benefit. However many studies havefailed to account for the heterogeneity of COPD lung disease, particularly with regard to the presence of bronchiectasis. Analysis of short-term studies suggests that there may be a cohort of patients who will benefit from prescription of a sputum clearance regimen. This review proposes a physiological rationale for the use of ACTs in COPD, taking into consideration the presence of bronchiectasis, the amount of sputum produced, the degree of airflow obstruction and the presence of decreased lung elastic recoil. The selection of an optimal ACT for individuals with COPD should take into account its effects on lung vloumes, expiratory flow and dynamic airway compression. Care should be taken to avoid airway collapse during forced expirations in patients with reduced lung recoil pressure; positive expiratory pressure therapy or autogenic drainage may prove effective in this patient group. The acceptability of ACTs to patients should also be considered, especially where long-term adherence is required. Future research should focus on more appropriate matching of the physiological effects of individual ACTs to the pathophysiology of lung disease in COPD.

Preventing Hospitalizations From Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive lung disease is among the leading causes of adult hospital admissions and readmissions in the United States. Preventing acute exacerbations is the primary approach in therapy. Combinations of smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, vaccinations and inhaled and oral medications may all reduce the overall risk of acute exacerbations. When prevention is unsuccessful, treatment of exacerbations often does not require hospitalization but can be safely executed in the outpatient setting. In the patient who does not require mechanical ventilation or who manifests respiratory acidosis, oxygen supplementation, frequent short-acting inhaled bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids and often antibiotics can abort the decompensation and sometimes return the patient to his or her pre-attack baseline lung function. Several models exist for delivering this care in the ambulatory setting. Follow-up care after an exacerbation has resolved is important, though there are few hard data suggesting which approach is best in this setting.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of herbal medicine on chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases

Herbal medicine (HM) as an adjunct therapy has been shown to be promising for the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the role of herbs in COPD remains largely unexplored. In this present study, we conducted the systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of herbs in COPD. 176 clinical studies with reporting pulmonary function were retrieved from English and Chinese database. Commonly used herbs for acute exacerbations stage (AECOPD) and stable COPD stage (SCOPD) were identified. A meta-analysis conducted from 15 high quality studies (18 publications) showed that HM as an adjunct therapy had no significant improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1, FEV%, FVC, and FEV1/FVC) compared to conventional medicine. The efficacy of the adjunct HM on improving the arterial blood gas (PaCO2 and PaO2) for AECOPD and SCOPD remains inconclusive due to the heterogeneity among the studies. However, HM as an adjunct therapy improved clinical symptoms and quality of life (total score, activity score, and impact score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire). Studies with large-scale and double-blind randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the role of the adjunct HM in the management of COPD.

Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic treatment is one of the major pharmacologic treatments for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the choice of antibiotic depends on the local resistance pattern. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was done in patients with AECOPD to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin with that of cefuroxime axetil.

METHODS

Patients with AECOPD and without radiographic evidence of pneumonia were enrolled and randomized to either levofloxacin 500 mg daily or cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily in the mildmoderate exacerbation group, or 500 mg twice daily in the severe exacerbation group, for seven days. Clinical efficacy and microbiologic response were evaluated 5-7 days after the last dose.

RESULTS

Treatment was clinically successful in 90.4% of patients in the levofloxacin group, and in 90.6% of patients in the cefuroxime group (95% confidence interval -9.40 to 10.91), within a noninferiority margin of 10%. The microbiologic response appeared to be higher in the levofloxacin group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The safety profile was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin is not inferior to cefuroxime with regard to clinical efficacy in treating AECOPD.

Pancreatic stone protein predicts positive sputum bacteriology in exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein (PSP/reg) serum levels are supposed to be increased in bacterial inflammation. PSP/reg levels also might be useful, therefore, as a predictor of bacterial infection in COPD.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients presenting to the ED due to acute exacerbation of COPD were prospectively assessed. Patients were evaluated based on clinical, laboratory, and lung functional parameters at admission (exacerbation) and after short-term follow-up (14-21 days). PSP/reg serum values were measured by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

PSP/reg levels were elevated in subjects with COPD exacerbation (23.8 ng/mL; 95% CI, 17.1-32.7) when compared with those with stable disease (19.1 ng/mL; 95% CI, 14.1-30.4; P 5 .03) and healthy control subjects (14.0 ng/mL; 95% CI , 12.0-19.0; P , .01). Higher PSP/reg values were observed in exacerbations with positive sputum bacteriology compared with those with negative sputum bacteriology (26.1 ng/mL [95% CI, 19.2-38.1] vs 20.8 ng/mL [95% CI , 15.6-27.2]; P , .01). Multivariate regression analysis revealed PSP/reg level as an independent predictor of positive sputum bacteriology. A combination of a PSP/reg cutoff value of . 33.9 ng/mL and presence of discolored sputum had a specificity of 97% to identify patients with pathogenic bacteria on sputum culture. In contrast, PSP/reg levels , 18.4 ng/mL and nonpurulent sputum ruled out positive bacterial sputum culture (sensitivity, 92%). In survival analysis, high PSP/reg levels at hospital admission were associated with increased 2-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum PSP/reg level might represent a promising new biomarker to identify bacterial etiology of COPD exacerbation.

[Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis]

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix and an imbalance between profibrotic and antifibrotic mediators. In the last few years, understanding of the mechanisms of the biology of IPF has increased. One of the most significant discoveries is the finding that alveolar epithelial cell injury plays an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. In this review, we describe some of the mechanisms involved in alveolar cell injury and their contribution to the development of IPF.

Acid-base disorders in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pathophysiological review

The authors describe the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to development of acidosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its deleterious effects on outcome and mortality rate. Renal compensatory adjustments consequent to acidosis are also described in detail with emphasis on differences between acute and chronic respiratory acidosis. Mixed acid-base disturbances due to comorbidity and side effects of some drugs in these patients are also examined, and practical considerations for a correct diagnosis are provided.

COPD exacerbations in general practice: variability in oral prednisolone courses

BACKGROUND

The use of oral corticosteroids as treatment of COPD exacerbations in primary care is well established and evidence-based. However, the most appropriate dosage regimen has not been determined and remains controversial. Corticosteroid therapy is associated with a number of undesirable side effects, including hyperglycaemias, so differences in prescribing might be relevant. This study examines the differences between GPs in dosage and duration of prednisolone treatment in patients with a COPD exacerbation. It also investigates the number of general practitioners (GPs) who adjust their treatment according to the presence of diabetic co-morbidity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study among 219 GPs and 25 GPs in training, located in the Northern part of the Netherlands.

RESULTS

The response rate was 69%. Nearly every GP prescribed a continuous dose of prednisolone 30 mg per day. Among GPs there were substantial differences in treatment duration. GPs prescribed courses of five, seven, ten, or fourteen days. A course of seven days was most common. The duration of treatment depended on exacerbation and disease severity. A course of five days was especially prescribed in case of a less severe exacerbation. In a more severe exacerbation duration of seven to fourteen days was more common. Hardly any GP adjusted treatment to the presence of diabetic co-morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Under normal conditions GPs prescribe prednisolone quite uniformly, within the range of the current Dutch guidelines. There is insufficient guidance regarding how to adjust corticosteroid treatment to exacerbation severity, disease severity and the presence of diabetic co-morbidity. Under these circumstances, there is a substantial variation in treatment duration.

Il percorso diagnostico-assistenziale della broncopneumopatia cronica ostruttiva riacutizzata in Medicina Interna

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the second leading cause of hospitalization in Internal Medicine departments in Italy and the fourth leading cause of death all over the word. By 2020, COPD will be the third leading cause of death and the fifth leading cause of disability. It is – along with chronic congestive heart failure – one of the most common causes of unscheduled hospital readmissions, and as such it represents a significant economic burden for the health-care system. Exacerbations of COPD are important events in the natural history of this prevalent condition.

Discussion

This review provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art look at prevention and management of COPD exacerbations. Treatment of these episodes has to be tailored to the severity of the clinical presentation. We now have a wide range of therapeutic available options, based on the results of clinical trials. Management of the acute event should include the necessary measures (mainly the administration of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators, inhaled or oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics), with or without oxygen and ventilator support.

Conclusions

To improve the management of COPD exacerbations, the focus of care must be shifted from the episodic acute complications to their systematic prevention. The management of COPD, which is often associated with multiple co-morbidities, is complex and requires a tailored, multifaceted and multidisciplinary approach. Integrated care for COPD also requires that patients be informed about their condition, that they participate actively in their care, and that they have easy access to the necessary health-care services.

Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care

The decision to admit a patient to the hospital after an emergency department (ED) visit is expensive, frequently not evidence-based, and variable. Outpatient critical pathways are a promising approach to reduce hospital admission after emergency care. Critical pathways exist to risk stratify patients for potentially serious diagnoses (e.g., acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) or evaluate response to therapy (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia) within a short time period (i.e., less than 36 hours), to determine if further hospital-based acute care is needed. Yet, such pathways are variably used while many patients are admitted for conditions for which they could be treated as outpatients. In this article, the authors propose a model of post-ED critical pathways, describe their role in emergency care, list common diagnoses that are amenable to critical pathways in the outpatient setting, and propose a research agenda to address barriers and solutions to increase the use of outpatient critical pathways. If emergency providers are to routinely conduct rapid evaluations in outpatient or observation settings, they must have several conditions at their disposal: 1) evidence-based tools to accurately risk stratify patients for protocolized care, 2) systems of care that reliably facilitate workup in the outpatient setting, and 3) a medical environment conducive to noninpatient pathways, with aligned risks and incentives among patients, providers, and payers. Increased use of critical pathways after emergency care is a potential way to improve the value of emergency care.

The economic impact of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbation definition: a review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a significant economic burden on society, and a substantial portion is related to exacerbations of COPD. A literature review of the direct and indirect costs of COPD exacerbations was performed. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database from 1998-2008 was conducted and supplemented with searches of conference abstracts and article bibliographies. Articles that contained cost data related to COPD exacerbations were selected for in-depth review. Eleven studies examining healthcare costs associated with COPD exacerbations were identified. The estimated costs of exacerbations vary widely across studies: $88 to $7,757 per exacerbation (2007 US dollars). The largest component of the total costs of COPD exacerbations was typically hospitalization. Costs were highly correlated with exacerbation severity. Indirect costs have rarely been measured. The wide variability in the cost estimates reflected cross-study differences in geographic locations, treatment patterns, and patient populations. Important methodological differences also existed across studies. Researchers have used different definitions of exacerbation (e.g., symptom- versus event-based definitions), different tools to identify and measure exacerbations, and different classification systems to define exacerbation severity. Unreported exacerbations are common and may influence the long-term costs of exacerbations. Measurement of indirect costs will provide a more comprehensive picture of the burden of exacerbations. Evaluation of pharmacoeconomic analyses would be aided by the use of more consistent and comprehensive approaches to defining and measuring COPD exacerbations.

Procalcitonin vs C-reactive protein as predictive markers of response to antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND

Rational prescription of antibiotics in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) requires predictive markers. We aimed to analyze whether markers of systemic inflammation can predict response to antibiotics in AECOPD.

METHODS

We used data from 243 exacerbations out of 205 patients from a placebo-controlled trial on doxycycline in addition to systemic corticosteroids for AECOPD. Clinical and microbiologic response, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level (cutoffs 5 and 50 mg/L), and serum procalcitonin level (PCT) (cutoffs 0.1 and 0.25 μg) were assessed.

RESULTS

Potential bacterial pathogens were identified in the majority of exacerbations (58%). We found a modest positive correlation between PCT and CRP (r = 0.46, P < .001). The majority of patients (75%) had low PCT levels, with mostly elevated CRP levels. Although CRP levels were higher in the presence of bacteria (median, 33.0 mg/L [interquartile range, 9.75-88.25] vs 17 mg/L [interquartile range, 5.0-61.0] [P = .004]), PCT levels were similar. PCT and CRP performed similarly as markers of clinical success, and we found a clinical success rate of 90% in patients with CRP ≤ 5 mg/L. A significant effect of doxycycline was observed in patients with a PCT level < .1 μg/L (treatment effect, 18.4%; P = .003). A gradually increasing treatment effect of antibiotics (6%, 10%, and 18%), although not significant, was found for patients with CRP values of ≤ 5, 6-50, and > 50 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the current literature, this study suggests that patients with low PCT values do benefit from antibiotics. CRP might be a more valuable marker in these patients.

The effects of ‘on-call/out of hours’ physical therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of an on-call physical therapy programme in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Secondary care level, rural hospital.

Subjects: Thirty-eight patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Interventions: Regular physical therapy and on-call physical therapy was given to two groups of patients with 19 in each arm. On-call physical therapy included providing respiratory physical therapy as required by the patient out of business hours.

Main measures: Peak expiratory flow rate, sustained maximal inspiration, six-minute walk distance and rating of perceived exertion post six-minute walk test.

Results: In the group receiving on-call physical therapy, peak expiratory flow rate and six-minute walk test showed a significant difference (52.1 L/min and 98.16 m, respectively) when compared with the control group (211.57 ± 51.12 L/min and 159.47 ± 67.78 L/min; P =0.01 and 387.89 ± 110.1 m and 289.73 ± 103.2 m; P=0.004 respectively). The difference in peak expiratory flow rate (Δ peak expiratory flow rate) was seen to be more in the on-call group (120 L/min) when compared to the control group (50 L/min), P =0.002. Improvements in sustained maximal inspiration and Borg’s rating of perceived exertion after the six-minute walk test were also observed (P>0.05).

Conclusion: On-call physical therapy brings about a significant increase in peak expiratory flow rates, six-minute walk distance and sustained maximal inspiration.

Antibiotics in addition to systemic corticosteroids for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE

The role of antibiotics in acute exacerbations is controversial and their efficacy when added to systemic corticosteroids is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects of doxycycline in addition to corticosteroids on clinical outcome, microbiological outcome, lung function, and systemic inflammation in patients hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

Of 223 patients, we enrolled 265 exacerbations defined on the basis of increased dyspnea and increased sputum volume with or without increased sputum purulence. Patients received 200 mg of oral doxycycline or matching placebo for 7 days in addition to systemic corticosteroids. Clinical and microbiological response, time to treatment failure, lung function, symptom scores, and serum C-reactive protein were assessed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

On Day 30, clinical success was similar in intention-to-treat patients (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 2.0) and per-protocol patients. Doxycycline showed superiority over placebo in terms of clinical success on Day 10 in intention-to-treat patients (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.2), but not in per-protocol patients. Doxycycline was also superior in terms of clinical cure on Day 10, microbiological outcome, use of open label antibiotics, and symptoms. There was no interaction between the treatment effect and any of the subgroup variables (lung function, type of exacerbation, serum C-reactive protein, and bacterial presence).

CONCLUSIONS

Although equivalent to placebo in terms of clinical success on Day 30, doxycycline showed superiority in terms of clinical success and clinical cure on Day 10, microbiological success, the use of open label antibiotics, and symptoms. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00170222).

Challenges Associated with Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences in COPD—The NHLBI Perspective

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common lung disease that exemplifies the value, as well as the difficulties and challenges, of using minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in clinical research. Development and validation of better endpoints for clinical studies is critical to research progress in COPD. However, the clinical, genetic, and pharmacological heterogeneity of the COPD patient population complicates attempts to define and validate MCIDs for COPD. It is difficult to identify a single measurable outcome that reflects the many components of the COPD patient's health state. Acute exacerbations of symptoms, which COPD patients often experience, present another challenge in the development of MCIDs for this disease. Consequently, the NHLBI does not require the use of MCIDs in clinical research. This allows research on the causes, prevention and diagnosis of COPD and use of endpoints for which an MCID is not yet known. It is important for the scientific community to reach agreement on what is a meaningful MCID in therapeutic trials for COPD. Further research into the concept of the MCID and its application should enable therapeutic trials in COPD to yield knowledge that is more effectively translated into improved public health.

Treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

BACKGROUND

Controversies persist regarding the optimal management of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the available evidence on relevant issues, namely the need for administering antimicrobials in patients with AECB, the identification of the subgroup of patients with AECB needing antibiotics, the antimicrobial regimen of choice and its optimal duration, the existence of new agents, and the value of non-antimicrobial regimens for AECB.

METHODS

Data from various sources of evidence, including recent relevant meta-analyses, were appraised.

CONCLUSION

Administration of antimicrobial agents, combined with bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids, is warranted in approximately half of AECBs (i.e., in bacterial exacerbations) to achieve a survival benefit. Simple clinical parameters, mainly sputum purulence, and biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, are useful in identifying patients requiring antibiotics. Advanced antibiotics (quinolones, macrolides, or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) are more effective than 'old' antibiotics in AECB; regimens of short duration (for 5 days) are preferred. There is no difference between several classes of advanced antibiotics regarding their short-term effectiveness; however, quinolones are associated with better long-term outcomes than macrolides. Newer quinolones and new formulations of macrolides enrich clinicians' armamentarium against AECB.

C-reactive protein and other predictors of poor outcome in patients hospitalized with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

CRP is elevated in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), but there is little information on whether this biomarker can help to identify adverse short-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A 6-month prospective study of all patients with AECOPD requiring hospital admission. Clinical, laboratory (including plasma CRP levels at admission) and functional data were recorded. The outcome variable (the adverse outcome) consisted of: (i) death in hospital or within 15 days of discharge, (ii) transfer to the intensive care unit, or (iii) development of acute heart failure during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Data from 147 patients with a total of 160 admissions were recorded. During follow up, 38 (23.7%) adverse outcomes were observed, including 13 (8.8%) and 8 (5.4%) patients who died during hospitalization or within 15 days of discharge, respectively. CRP at a level of 50 mg/L was related to an adverse outcome (OR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.92-12.6, P < 0.01), although by itself it was neither sensitive nor specific (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.77). However, a risk score derived from the combination of CRP with other variables, such as 'current smoker', 'at least two comorbidities' and 'confusion,' at admission showed good predictive ability to identify an adverse outcome (AUC of 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma CRP in combination with other variables obtained at admission may assist identification of high-risk patients with AECOPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnosis and management

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current modalities employed in diagnosing and treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Special emphasis is placed on current guidelines, as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.

DATA SOURCE

A comprehensive literature review for COPD serves as the basis for this article.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the National COPD Coalition (2004), there are nearly 24 million Americans who suffer from COPD. The incidence of COPD is rising globally and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. COPD is characterized by progressive decline in function, resulting in concomitant diseases, which increase healthcare dollar expenditures, thus making COPD a concern for healthcare providers in the United States and abroad.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Once a diagnosis of COPD is made, healthcare providers should explore multiple treatment options in an effort to find the most beneficial regimen. It is only when the treatments are individualized, including physiological therapies and cognitive approaches to lessen risks as well as to reduce exacerbations, that the patient with COPD is able to potentially experience a reasonable quality of life.

Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and COPD in UK primary care

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms may be more common in patients with COPD than in control subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between diagnoses of COPD and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in primary care.

METHODS

We used the UK General Practice Research Database to identify a cohort of patients with a first diagnosis of GERD (n = 4,391) and another cohort of patients with a first diagnosis of COPD (n = 1,628) during 1996, which we compared with age-matched and sex-matched comparison cohorts without either diagnosis. We calculated the incidence of a GERD diagnosis among the patients with COPD and control subjects, and of a COPD diagnosis among the patients with GERD and control subjects. We also calculated the relative risk (RR) estimates of these diagnoses using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Risks associated with medication use, comorbidities, and demographic and lifestyle factors were examined using a nested case-control analysis.

RESULTS

During the 5-year follow-up, the RR of an incident COPD diagnosis in patients with a diagnosis of GERD was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.49), while the RR of an incident GERD diagnosis among patients with a diagnosis of COPD was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.78). A COPD diagnosis was associated with current or former smoking, prior diagnosis of asthma, or the use of asthma medication. A GERD diagnosis was associated with a prior diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a diagnosis of COPD are at a significantly increased risk of a diagnosis of GERD compared with individuals with no COPD diagnosis.

Optimizing economic outcomes in the management of COPD

Attention to COPD is increasing worldwide because its high prevalence, morbidity, and mortality present a challenging problem for all healthcare systems. The burden of COPD, which is usually measured in terms of progressive lung function decline, impact on patients' symptoms, patient's disability, and quality of life, together with the corresponding use of health care resources, is still a major aspect of the disease. Recommendations to treat COPD according to the most accepted guidelines have expanded in recent years even though COPD still remains unacceptably under-diagnosed and under-treated worldwide. Obviously, more severe degrees of COPD receive major attention both in terms of monitoring of clinical outcomes and of assessing the economic value of therapeutic interventions. The role of different strategies against COPD should be valued on the basis of their effectiveness in outcome optimization, which primarily depends on the efficacy of prevention activities and of early diagnosis programs. It is generally agreed that the main proportion of COPD burden still depends on the clinically uncontrolled disease and on its high exacerbation rate, which frequently leads to the patient hospitalization. In COPD, the effects of guideline recommendations have been only sporadically investigated in pharmaoeconomic terms, even though symptoms and disability have declined substantially; the corresponding improvement in quality of life, and a significant decrease in both direct and indirect costs have been proved to depend on appropriate rehabilitative and pharmacological long-term treatment of the disease. At present, more precise indices and more fitting outcomes are continuously sought and found in order to assess more effective strategies for controlling COPD.

Bronchodilators in COPD: impact of beta-agonists and anticholinergics on severe exacerbations and mortality

This review summarizes the long-term clinical outcomes associated with β-agonist and anticholinergic bronchodilator use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pooled data from randomized placebo-controlled trials of at least three months duration were used to evaluate the risk for COPD hospitalizations, respiratory mortality, and total mortality. The results show that anticholinergic use is associated with a 30% reduction in COPD hospitalizations, a 70% reduction in respiratory mortality, and without a significant effect on total mortality. In contrast, β-agonist use had no effect on COPD hospitalizations and was associated with a two-fold increased risk for respiratory death compared with placebo. When the two bronchodilators were directly compared with each other, β-agonists were associated with a two-fold increased risk for COPD hospitalization and a five-fold increased risk for total mortality compared with anticholinergics. When β-agonists were added to either anticholinergic use or inhaled corticosteroid use alone, there was no significant improvement in any long-term clinical outcome. These results indicate that anticholinergics should be the bronchodilator of choice in COPD, while β-agonists may be associated with poorer disease control.

Noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive airway disease

Recent years have seen the emergence of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as an important tool for management of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Several well conducted studies in the recent years have established its role in the initial, as well as later management of these patients. However, some grey areas remain. Moreover, data is emerging on the role of long term nocturnal NIV use in patients with very severe stable COPD. This review summarizes the evidence supporting the use of NIV in various stages of COPD, discuss the merits as well as demerits of this novel ventilatory strategy and highlight the grey areas in the current body of knowledge.

Role of macrolide therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The Global Burden of Disease study has concluded that COPD will become the third leading cause of death worldwide by 2020, and will increase its ranking of disability-adjusted life years lost from 12th to 5th. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are associated with impaired quality of life and pulmonary function. More frequent or severe AECOPDs have been associated with especially markedly impaired quality of life and a greater longitudinal loss of pulmonary function. COPD and AECOPDs are characterized by an augmented inflammatory response. Macrolide antibiotics are macrocyclical lactones that provide adequate coverage for the most frequently identified pathogens in AECOPD and have been generally included in published guidelines for AECOPD management. In addition, they exert broad-ranging, immunomodulatory effects both in vitro and in vivo, as well as diverse actions that suppress microbial virulence factors. Macrolide antibiotics have been used to successfully treat a number of chronic, inflammatory lung disorders including diffuse panbronchiolitis, asthma, noncystic fibrosis associated bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis. Data in COPD patients have been limited and contradictory but the majority hint to a potential clinical and biological effect. Additional, prospective, controlled data are required to define any potential treatment effect, the nature of this effect, and the role of bronchiectasis, baseline colonization, and other cormorbidities.

Non-invasive ventilation in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients with exacerbation and a pH of 7.35 or higher

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines suggest the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations in patients presenting with a pH of 7.25-7.35. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of NIV in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted to the hospital with acute exacerbations and an arterial pH of 7.35 or higher.

METHODS

Forty-seven COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted for exacerbations and with a pH of 7.35 or higher were randomized to receive standard medical therapy (control group) or medical therapy plus NIV (NIV group). Arterial blood gases were measured at baseline, after 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and at discharge. Need for admission to intensive care unit (ICU), death, and duration of hospitalization were recorded. The final analysis included 42 patients (21 controls and 21 NIV patients).

RESULTS

NIV resulted in a shorter hospital stay (5.5+/-2.6 vs 10.1+/-4.4 days for controls, p=0.0004). Two patients from the control group were admitted to the ICU and one eventually died, whereas all NIV patients were successfully discharged. The NIV group showed a faster improvement in PaCO(2) and pH. At discharge, the NIV group had a lower PaCO(2) (6.5+/-0.6 kPa vs 7.5+/-1.1 kPa, p=0.01) but a comparable pH (7.43+/-0.03 vs 7.43+/-0.04, p=0.93). PaO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2) levels showed similar improvement in both groups at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Early administration of NIV in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted for acute exacerbations with a pH of 7.35 or higher results in a reduced hospital stay and faster improvement of arterial blood gases.

Models of infection and exacerbations in COPD

Despite optimal use of currently available therapy for stable COPD, acute exacerbations are common events that constitute a major health burden. The development of highly sensitive diagnostic tools highlighted the role of viral infections in inducing COPD exacerbations, with rhinoviruses being the most frequently identified virus type. So far, little is known about the mechanisms of virus-induced exacerbations. The recent development of the first human rhinovirus-induced COPD exacerbation model represents an invaluable tool towards increasing our knowledge of immunological and inflammatory mechanisms of COPD exacerbation. The model will give us the opportunity to highlight key inflammatory mediators representing possible therapeutic targets for the development of novel drugs able to treat and prevent acute episodes in COPD.

Open-label, randomized comparison trial of long-term outcomes of levofloxacin versus standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether treating acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) with levofloxacin modifies the long-term outcome of COPD patients in comparison with standard antibiotic regimens.

METHODS

A 6-month open-label clinical trial of AE-COPD patients compared the outcomes of treating with levofloxacin versus standard therapy (clarithromycin, cefuroxime, or amoxicillin/clavulanate) at recommended doses for 10 days. Several variables were analysed: pulse oximetry, FEV1, health-related quality of life, infection-free interval, number of exacerbations, hospitalizations due to an exacerbation and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 116 patients initially enrolled, completion or withdrawal information was available for 50 patients in the levofloxacin arm and 52 in the standard therapy arm. At the end of the study, there were no differences in mortality (17.8% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.53), number of exacerbations (33 vs. 41, P = 0.40), pulse oximetry (median 91.71% vs. 92.46%, P = 0.18), FEV1 (median 51.31% vs. 47.14%, P = 0.30), health-related quality of life (median 8.63 vs. 10.75, P = 0.94) and infection-free interval (median 112 vs. 101 days, P = 0.72), for the levofloxacin and standard therapy, respectively. However, 12 out of 33 (33.6%) exacerbations treated with levofloxacin required in-hospital management versus 27 out of 41 (65.8%) treated with standard therapy (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that 10-day treatment of AE-COPD with levofloxacin is associated with a reduction in hospitalizations compared with standard antibiotics despite there being no significant benefit in other outcome variables.

Clinical and economic analysis of antimicrobial therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

The aim of the study was to analyse the clinical and economic indicators of the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study focused specifically on antimicrobial therapy and the use of fluoroquinolones in the management of exacerbations. Data on the consumption of antibiotics to treat exacerbations in ambulatory care were derived from IMS Health. Also, an observational, retrospective analysis was carried out of patients who entered the clinical pathway for COPD exacerbations in University Hospitals Leuven. IMS Health data showed that there is a trend towards the increasing use of broad-spectrum penicillins and fluoroquinolones, and decreasing use of tetracyclines in the treatment of COPD exacerbations in ambulatory care in Belgium in the first half of the 2000s. The observational analysis enrolled 267 patients who were hospitalised between October 2000 and October 2005 to manage 359 exacerbations according to the clinical pathway. Median length of stay per exacerbation amounted to 10 days. Mean quality of life associated with an exacerbation was 74 using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Median costs of hospital treatment amounted to euro5514 (third-party payer reimbursement and patient co-payment) per exacerbation. Treatment costs were driven by hospital stay (75% of total costs), diagnostic and laboratory tests (20%) and medication (5%). Antibiotics played a role in the hospital management of 75% of exacerbations. Fluoroquinolones were used to treat more severe exacerbations. Treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD imposes a significant clinical and economic burden on patients, the healthcare system and the society.

Review of guidelines and the literature in the treatment of acute bronchospasm in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In 2002, an estimated 11.2 million adults in the United States had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Guidelines for the management of the disease have been published by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society. Several other organizations are in the process of preparing guidelines for COPD, most based on the GOLD report. The most important pharmacologic intervention in COPD is treatment with bronchodilator drugs. This intervention applies not only to stable COPD, but also to exacerbations (flares) of the disease. Prevention strategies have been developed for acute exacerbations, and management strategies include using short-acting beta(2)-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and antibiotics, in both at home and hospital settings.

Economic aspects of antimicrobial therapy of acute exacerbations of COPD

This article synthesizes and appraises the methodological quality of the international literature on costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, economic value of antimicrobial therapy of exacerbations, and factors affecting the economic value of antibiotics. Included studies had carried out a cost-of-illness, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit analysis. Exacerbation costs varied between countries and increased with the severity of the exacerbation. Hospitalization costs accounted for more than 45% of healthcare costs of exacerbations. Drug costs made up 6-21% of healthcare costs in the majority of studies. Cost estimates were biased due to difficulties involved in diagnosing and treating exacerbations, and because the patient sample studied may not be representative of the population of patients suffering from exacerbations. Although this needs to be corroborated by future research, evidence is emerging that second-generation antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones may have a favourable economic profile as compared with first-generation antibiotics. The higher acquisition costs of fluoroquinolones appear to be balanced by less treatment failure, more time between exacerbation episodes, and lower hospitalization costs. There is a need for prospective economic evaluations alongside clinical trials with a sufficient number of patients and length of follow-up period. The economic value of antibiotics is influenced by difficulties involved in diagnosing the condition, effectiveness, resistance, patient compliance with treatment, and treatment failure associated with antibiotics. The small number of economic evaluations and their methodological limitations precludes the recommendation of a specific antibiotic for use in the management of COPD exacerbations on economic grounds.

Bronchitis

Bronchitis is characterized by bronchial inflammation that results in …

Antibiotic Treatment of Exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND

Therapy with antibiotics influences recovery only in selected cases of COPD exacerbations. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance compared to standard therapy with antibiotic prescriptions in patients experiencing exacerbations of COPD.

METHODS

A total of 208 consecutive patients requiring hospitalization for COPD exacerbation were randomized at the index exacerbation to procalcitonin-guided or standard antibiotic therapy. Patients receiving procalcitonin-guided therapy were treated with antibiotics according to serum procalcitonin levels; standard-therapy patients received antibiotics according to the attending physician. The primary outcome was the antibiotic exposure at the index exacerbation and the subsequent antibiotic requirement for COPD exacerbation within 6 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical recovery, symptom scores, length of hospitalization, ICU stay, death, lung function, exacerbation rate, and time to next exacerbation.

RESULTS

At the index exacerbation, procalcitonin guidance reduced antibiotic prescription (40% vs 72%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and antibiotic exposure (relative risk [RR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.73; p < 0.0001) compared to standard therapy. Moreover, procalcitonin guidance at the index exacerbation allowed a significant sustained reduction in total antibiotic exposure for up to 6 months (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.92; p = 0.004). Clinical outcome and improvement in FEV(1) at 14 days and 6 months did not differ between groups. Within 6 months, the exacerbation rate (0.62 vs 0.64, respectively), the rehospitalization rate (0.21 vs 0.24, respectively), and mean (+/- SD) time to the next exacerbation (70.0 +/- 46.1 vs 70.4 +/- 51.9 days, respectively; p = 0.523) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Procalcitonin guidance for exacerbations of COPD offers a sustained advantage over standard therapy in reducing antibiotic use for up to 6 months with a number-needed-to-treat of 3.