Levalbuterol compared to racemic albuterol: efficacy and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COPD or asthma

Quantifying the Length of Stay and Economic Impact of Albuterol and Levalbuterol in Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions in China and imposes a considerable economic burden on hospitalized patients who experience exacerbations. Nebulized short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) are recommended as initial therapy for exacerbation patients, but the optimal SABA remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different SABAs, such as albuterol and levalbuterol, on the length of stay (LOS) and direct medical costs among hospitalized patients diagnosed with COPD. Methods This retrospective cohort study uses linked hospital administrative data from three hospitals in Chongqing. Patients with COPD, aged 40 years and older, who had been continuously treated with nebulized albuterol or levalbuterol during hospitalization, were eligible for the study. Patients were matched 1:1 by sex, age, and severity according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1-4. Patients were grouped according to the different SABA treatments they received. Demographic, economic, and clinical data were retrieved. LOS and direct healthcare costs were assessed. Results A total of 158 COPD patients were included, with 79 in each treatment group. Patients treated with levalbuterol had a significantly shorter median LOS (7.0 days vs. 8.0 days, P=0.003) and fewer direct healthcare median costs (total cost: ¥8,868.3 vs. ¥10,290.7, P=0.014; COPD-related western medicine fees: ¥383.8 vs. ¥505.3). Patients aged 60 or older were more likely to experience longer LOS and higher direct costs. Conclusion This retrospective cohort analysis supports that albuterol was associated with longer LOS and higher costs than levalbuterol.

Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy

Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.

Levalbuterol vs. albuterol for hospitalized patients with COPD in China: cost-utility and budget impact analysis

OBJECTIVES

For hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), albuterol and levalbuterol can both be used as relievers to alleviate bronchoconstriction. This study aimed to evaluate levalbuterol and albuterol's cost-utility and budget impact in hospitalized patients with COPD.

INTERVENTIONS

A cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the impact on the costs of nebulized levalbuterol verse albuterol in hospitalized patients with COPD. The decision tree model was employed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year in the admission setting. A budget impact model was used to examine the impact of budget on levalbuterol's entry into the Chinese market from the healthcare system's perspective. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the uncertainty of the parameters.

RESULTS

The cost-utility results showed that levalbuterol saved ¥495.7 ($105.1) per hospitalization, while the budget impact analysis revealed a potential saving of ¥22.3 ($6.8) million in 3 years. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust to the changes in input parameter values.

CONCLUSION

Levalbuterol is a cost-saving option for treating hospitalized patients with COPD in China.

A review of nebulized drug delivery in COPD

Current guidelines recommend inhaled pharmacologic therapy as the preferred route of administration for treating COPD. Bronchodilators (β₂-agonists and antimuscarinics) are the mainstay of pharmacologic therapy in patients with COPD, with long-acting agents recommended for patients with moderate to severe symptoms or those who are at a higher risk for COPD exacerbations. Dry powder inhalers and pressurized metered dose inhalers are the most commonly used drug delivery devices, but they may be inadequate in various clinical scenarios (eg, the elderly, the cognitively impaired, and hospitalized patients). As more drugs become available in solution formulations, patients with COPD and their caregivers are becoming increasingly satisfied with nebulized drug delivery, which provides benefits similar to drugs delivered by handheld inhalers in both symptom relief and improved quality of life. This article reviews recent innovations in nebulized drug delivery and the important role of nebulized therapy in the treatment of COPD.

Clinical outcomes and treatment cost comparison of levalbuterol versus albuterol in hospitalized adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma

PURPOSE

Results of a prospective study comparing clinical outcomes and costs of levalbuterol versus albuterol therapy for exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are presented.

METHODS

In a single-center open-label study, selected adults hospitalized for asthma or COPD exacerbations over a 21-month period were randomly assigned to receive levalbuterol 1.25 mg three times daily (n = 55) or albuterol 2.5 mg four times daily (n = 57); dosage reductions and other respiratory therapies were permitted. Study outcomes included scheduled and rescue nebulizations, total treatment costs, hospital length of stay, and change in heart rate from baseline.

RESULTS

The numbers of scheduled nebulizations were similar in the levalbuterol and albuterol groups (mean ± S.D., 19.6 ± 13.4 versus 20.7 ± 14.4; p = 0.692), as were the numbers of rescue nebulizations (mean ± S.D., 0.7 ± 1.4 versus 0.8 ± 2.0; p = 0.849). The mean change from baseline in heart rate did not differ significantly between groups. Mean total treatment costs per patient were significantly greater with the use of levalbuterol ($8003, bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI], $6628-$9379) versus albuterol ($5772, bootstrap 95% CI, $5051-$6494; p = 0.006). Hospital length of stay was significantly greater in the levalbuterol group (mean ± S.D., 8.5 ± 5.2 days versus 6.8 ± 3.6 days with albuterol use; p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes were similar with the use of levalbuterol versus albuterol for exacerbations of COPD or asthma. On average, patients receiving levalbuterol had longer and more costly hospital stays.

Postoperative pulmonary complications: reducing risks for noncardiac surgery

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a major contributor to the overall risk of noncardiac surgery that may lead to serious postoperative morbidity and long-term mortality. Nurse practitioners should be familiar with risk indices for PPCs, clinical guidelines, and risk reduction strategies to prevent PPCs and improve PPC outcomes.

Levosalbutamol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a treatment evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory disorder associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. β2-adrenoceptor agonists (β2-agonists) act by stimulating the β2-adrenoceptor present on smooth muscle and other cells in the airways, resulting in bronchodilatation. β2-agonists play a central role in the treatment of breathlessness in patients with COPD. Salbutamol is a chiral drug with (R)- and (S)- isomers. Almost all β2-agonists that are currently used are racemic mixtures of (R)- and (S)-salbutamol.

AREAS COVERED

(R)-salbutamol alone (Xenopex®, generically known as levosalbutamol) is now indicated for the treatment or prevention of bronchospasm with reversible obstructive airway disease. This evaluation demonstrates that (R)-salbutamol provides a beneficial β2-agonist effect at a cellular level and in experimental models of airways disease. Furthermore, we demonstrate that (S)-salbutamol opposes the desirable effects of (R)-salbutamol and can actually cause features of asthma and COPD in vitro and in experimental asthma.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite this strong body of preclinical experimental evidence, (R)-salbutamol has not shown consistent superiority over (S)- or racemic salbutamol in the treatment of patients with COPD.

Albuterol and levalbuterol use and spending in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The evidence for the benefits of branded levalbuterol over generic albuterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is inconclusive. However, there are significant cost differences between these products.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined use and spending on albuterol and levalbuterol in a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD enrolled in Part D in 2006. It also examined differences in patient characteristics and use of other COPD drugs among recipients of these 2 short-acting β-agonists.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the 5% Medicare files for 2005-2006 linked to the 2006 Medicare Part D files. The sample consisted of all fee-for-service beneficiaries with COPD enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2006. Patient characteristics and other COPD medication use were compared across albuterol-only users, levalbuterol-only users, and users of both albuterol and levalbuterol. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to identify factors independently associated with levalbuterol use.

RESULTS

There were 5.5 times more albuterol users than levalbuterol users in 2006; however, mean annual spending on levalbuterol was 18.6 times higher per user in 2006 than spending on albuterol ($1876 vs $101 per user, respectively). Levalbuterol-only users were more likely to be older than albuterol-only users (mean age: 71.5 vs 68.7 years; P < 0.05), as well as sicker (mean prescription drug hierarchical condition category score: 1.72 vs 1.55; P < 0.05) and residing in the South (67.9% vs 41.6%; P < 0.05). Levalbuterol-only users were more likely to use nebulizer forms covered under Part B than inhaler forms covered under Part D (78.6% vs 26.8%, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas albuterol-only users were more likely to use inhaler forms covered under Part D than nebulizer forms covered under Part B (82.2% vs 33.0%, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD enrolled in Part D, mean annual spending in 2006 was significantly higher for levalbuterol than for albuterol. The differences between levalbuterol and albuterol users in terms of patient characteristics, geographic region, and drug formulation/device type, coupled with the inconclusive evidence for efficacy differences in the literature, highlight the need for further comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of these agents.

Albuterol enantiomer levels, lung function and QTc interval in patients with acute severe asthma and COPD in the emergency department

Background

This observational study was designed to investigate plasma levels of albuterol enantiomers among patients with acute severe asthma or COPD presenting to the emergency department, and the relationship with extra-pulmonary cardiac effects (QTc interval) and lung function. Recent reviews have raised concerns about the safety of using large doses of β₂-agonists, especially in patients with underlying cardiovascular comorbidity. It has been demonstrated that significant extrapulmonary effects can be observed in subjects given nebulised (R/S)-albuterol at a dose of as little as 6.5 mg.

Methods

Blood samples were collected and plasma/serum levels of (R)- and (S)-albuterol enantiomers were determined by LC-MS and LC-MS/MS assay. Extra-pulmonary effects measured at presentation included ECG measurements, serum potassium level and blood sugar level, which were collected from the hospital medical records.

Results

High plasma levels of both enantiomers were observed in some individuals, with median (range) concentrations of 8.2 (0.6-24.8) and 20.6 (0.5-57.3) ng/mL for (R)- and (S)- albuterol respectively among acute asthma subjects, and 2.1 (0.0-16.7) to 4.1 (0.0-36.1) ng/mL for (R)- and (S)- albuterol respectively among COPD subjects. Levels were not associated with an improvement in lung function or adverse cardiac effects (prolonged QTc interval).

Conclusions

High plasma concentrations of albuterol were observed in both asthma and COPD patients presenting to the emergency department. Extra-pulmonary cardiac adverse effects (prolonged QTC interval) were not associated with the plasma level of (R)- or (S)-albuterol when administered by inhaler in the emergency department setting. Long-term effect(s) of continuous high circulating albuterol enantiomer concentrations remain unknown, and further investigations are required.

(R)-salbutamol in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease

INTRODUCTION

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are inflammatory disorders that have an increasing prevalence and associated morbidity and mortality. β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (β(2)-agonists) act by stimulating the β(2)-adrenoceptor present on airway smooth muscle and other cells in the airway, resulting in bronchodilatation. β(2)-agonists are among the most commonly used drugs in the world and remain pivotal in the treatment of symptoms in patients with asthma and COPD. Salbutamol is a chiral drug with (R)- and (S)- isomers. Almost all β(2)-agonists that are used at present are racemic mixtures of (R)- and (S)-salbutamol.

AREAS COVERED

In this review the authors show that (R)-salbutamol alone (generically known as levosalbutamol) provides beneficial β(2)-agonist effects at a cellular level and in experimental models of airways disease. In addition the authors demonstrate that (S)-salbutamol opposes the desirable effects of (R)-salbutamol and can actually cause features of asthma and COPD in vitro and in experimental asthma.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite this strong body of experimental evidence, (R)-salbutamol has not shown consistent superiority over (S)- or racemic salbutamol in human asthma or COPD.

Inhaled albuterol/salbutamol and ipratropium bromide and their combination in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Combination therapy with albuterol and ipratropium bromide was approved > 15 years ago for the treatment of COPD. We review the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and safety of albuterol, ipratropium and combined albuterol-ipratropium therapy.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We conducted a PubMed literature search using the keywords COPD, albuterol, ipratropium bromide and Combivent (Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Ridgefield, CT, USA); pertinent references within the identified citations are included in the review. Data from the manufacturers are also evaluated.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

At the time of its approval, albuterol/ipratropium bromide was an innovative combination of existing medications for the treatment of COPD. The combined formulation provides better improvement in airflow than either component alone and, by reducing the number of separate inhalers, simplifies therapy and improves compliance compared with the individual components.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The recent development and approval of longer acting and more potent beta agonists, anticholinergics and newer combination treatments have surpassed many of the advantages of combined albuterol-ipratropium for the treatment of patients with stable COPD.

Emergency hospital admissions after income-based deductibles and prescription copayments in older users of inhaled medications

BACKGROUND

Rapid growth in prescription drug costs has compelled insurers to require increased patient cost-sharing.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 recent cost-sharing policies on emergency hospitalizations due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or emphysema (CAE), and on physician visits.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a large-scale natural experiment in British Columbia (BC), Canada. The cost-sharing policies were a fixed copayment policy (fixed copay policy) and an income-based deductible (IBD) policy with 25% coinsurance (IBD policy). Prescription, physician billing, and hospitalization records were obtained from the BC Ministry of Health. From the total population of BC residents > or = 65 years of age, we extracted data from all patients dispensed an inhaled corticosteroid, beta(2)-agonist, or anticholinergic from June 30, 1997, to April 30, 2004. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the impact of the policies in a cohort of patients receiving long-term inhaler treatment. An identically defined historical control group unaffected by the policy changes was used for comparison.

RESULTS

The study population included 37,320 users of long-term inhaled medications from the BC population of 576,000 persons > or = 65 years of age. During the IBD period but not the fixed copay period, emergency hospitalizations for CAE increased 41% (95% CI for adjusted rate ratio [RR], 1.24-1.60) in patients > or = 65 years of age. There was also a significant increase in physician visits of 3% (95% CI for adjusted RR, 1.01-1.05). No significant increases were observed during the fixed copay period. In a secondary analysis using a concurrent control group, we estimated a smaller but significant increase in emergency CAE hospitalizations of 29% (95% CI for adjusted RR, 1.09-1.52). This analysis also showed increases in physician visits (fixed copay period RR, 1.03 [95% CI for adjusted RR, 1.01-1.05]; IBD period RR, 1.07 [95% CI for adjusted RR, 1.05-1.08]).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the IBD policy was likely associated with an increased risk for emergency hospitalization and physician visits in these users of inhaled medications who were aged > or = 65 years.

Update on the pharmacologic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a treatable disease characterized by progressive airflow limitation. Prevention of disease progression; improvement of symptoms, exercise tolerance, and health status; and decrease in exacerbations and mortality are the goals of management. Inhaled short-acting bronchodilators are recommended for symptoms in mild disease, whereas inhaled long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for maintenance therapy of daily symptoms. When symptoms are not controlled using one bronchodilator, combining bronchodilators may be more effective. Combining a long-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid is more effective than either agent alone. Several novel therapies are in different stages of development.

Evidence based review on levosalbutamol

Salbutamol, the most commonly used bronchodilator, is a chiral drug with R (levosalbutamol) and S-isomers (also known as enantiomer). The commonly used formulation is a racemic mixture that contains equal amounts of both R and S isomers. Levosalbutamol is the therapeutically active isomer and has all the beta 2 agonist activity. Until recently S-salbutamol was considered inert filler in the racemic mixture but animal as well as human studies have shown that S-salbutamol is not inert rather it may have some deleterious effects. Enantioselective metabolism of salbutamol leads to higher and sustained plasma levels of S-salbutamol with repeated dosing. There has been concern that chronic use of racemic salbutamol may lead to loss of effectiveness and clinical deterioration. Formulation of salbutamol containing only R- isomer (levosalbutamol) has been available in international market since last few years. Clinical trials in acute as well as chronic asthma in adults as well as children have shown that it has therapeutic advantage over racemic salbutamol and also is more cost effective. But, large multicenter trials are needed to prove its therapeutic superiority and cost-effectiveness in long term.

Review of guidelines and the literature in the treatment of acute bronchospasm in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In 2002, an estimated 11.2 million adults in the United States had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Guidelines for the management of the disease have been published by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society. Several other organizations are in the process of preparing guidelines for COPD, most based on the GOLD report. The most important pharmacologic intervention in COPD is treatment with bronchodilator drugs. This intervention applies not only to stable COPD, but also to exacerbations (flares) of the disease. Prevention strategies have been developed for acute exacerbations, and management strategies include using short-acting beta(2)-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and antibiotics, in both at home and hospital settings.

Management of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Elderly

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating disease with rising worldwide prevalence. Exacerbations of COPD cause significant morbidity and become more common with advancing age. Healthcare providers caring for elderly patients should therefore be familiar with effective treatments for exacerbations of COPD. An extensive body of literature has identified several effective drug therapies for exacerbations. These drugs include inhaled bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids and antibacterials. The two main classes of inhaled bronchodilators are beta-adrenoceptor agonists and anticholinergics. These drugs optimise lung function during exacerbations, with neither class demonstrating clear superiority over the other. Systemic corticosteroids are effective when used either for inpatient or outpatient treatment of exacerbations. They hasten recovery from exacerbations and reduce relapse rates. Antibacterials decrease morbidity from exacerbations and may decrease mortality in the more severe exacerbations. Other effective therapies for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD include oxygen and non-invasive ventilation. Oxygen can be safely administered in acute exacerbations associated with hypoxaemia, with titration of oxygen delivery to a goal oxygen saturation of 90%. Non-invasive ventilation reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with acute exacerbations complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure. Strategies to prevent COPD exacerbations include smoking cessation, long-acting inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists, inhaled long-acting anticholinergics, inhaled corticosteroids and vaccination. Mucolytic agents, pulmonary rehabilitation, and case management programmes may also reduce exacerbation risk, but the current evidence supporting these interventions is weaker.

(R)-albuterol for asthma: pro [a.k.a. (S)-albuterol for asthma: con]

Is there scientific evidence to support the replacement of the beta-agonist racemic albuterol with levalbuterol--that is, (R)-albuterol? The argument presented further refines the question as "Do we wish to continue to treat asthma with a mixture of albuterol, of which half is an agent with no known benefit--that is, (S)-albuterol--and which may exacerbate the disease?"

Impact of two sequential drug cost-sharing policies on the use of inhaled medications in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma

BACKGROUND

Evaluations of drug cost-sharing policies within the same population are needed for a fair comparison of different options.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to analyze the impact of 2 changes in a public drug insurance plan on the use of inhaled medications in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

METHODS

Data for the period from 1997 to 2004 were used to assess whether changes in the use of steroid, beta2-agonist, and anticholinergic inhalers were associated with insurance-plan changes in a large, natural experiment involving all BC residents aged>or=65 years. The 3 sequential policies included full coverage, fixed copayments at the beginning of 2002, and 25% coinsurance with an income-based deductible beginning May 1, 2003. Linkable prescription, physician billing, hospitalization, and mortality records were obtained from the BC Ministry of Health Services. From the total population of residents aged>or=65 years, we extracted data for all patients to whom inhaled steroids, beta2-agonists, or anticholinergics were dispensed on or after January 1, 1997. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate inhaler use during a 60-month baseline period and during implementation of the subsequent copayment and coinsurance plus deductible policies. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of initiation and cessation use of inhaled medications among older patients.

RESULTS

Use declined for inhaled steroids (-12.3%; P<0.001), inhaled anticholinergics (-12.2%; P<0.001), and inhaled beta2-agonists (-5.8%; P<0.001). Patients with new diagnoses of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were 25% (95% CI, 14%-31%) less likely to initiate treatment with inhaled steroids when covered by the copayment or coinsurance plus deductible policies than when they had full coverage. Chronic users of inhaled steroids were 47% (95% CI, 40%-55%) more likely to cease treatment when they were covered by the copayment policy and 22% (95% CI, 15%-29%) more likely to cease when covered by the coinsurance plus deductible policy than when they had full coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

The copayment and coinsurance plus deductible policies were associated with significant reductions in use of inhaled medications, mostly due to decreased initiation and increased cessation rates. However, the consequences of these policies on health outcomes have not yet been determined.

Levosalbutamol in the treatment of asthma

With the exception of levosalbutamol, all of the beta2-agonists that are currently in use are racemic mixtures that are composed in equal amounts of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers. Clinical and mechanistic studies have demonstrated that (R)-salbutamol alone provides the beta2-agonist activity that is needed for the relief of bronchoconstriction, as well as the beta2-adrenergically mediated side effects. (S)-Salbutamol, on the other hand, has minimal binding affinity for the beta2-receptor, indicating that its effects are likely to be mediated through another site. Furthermore, there is evidence that (S)-salbutamol opposes the desirable effects of (R)-salbutamol in the racemic mixture and contributes to the development of characteristic features of asthma, such as airway obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Evidence from clinical studies shows delayed recovery from exacerbation of asthma by patients who are exposed to high concentrations of (S)-salbutamol.

A comparison of levalbuterol with racemic albuterol in the treatment of acute severe asthma exacerbations in adults

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial compared nebulized levalbuterol (Lev) and racemic albuterol (Rac) in the treatment of acute asthma.

METHODS

Adults with acute asthma exacerbations (FEV(1) 20%-55% predicted) received prednisone and either Lev (1.25 mg, n = 315) or Rac (2.5 mg, n = 312). Nebulized treatments were administered every 20 minutes in the first hour, then every 40 minutes for 3 additional doses, then as necessary for up to 24 hours. The primary end point was time to meet discharge criteria. Secondary end points included changes in lung function and hospitalization rates. A subset of 160 patients had plasma (S)-albuterol concentrations determined at study entry.

RESULTS

Time to meet discharge criteria did not differ between the 2 treatments. FEV(1) improvement was greater following Lev compared with Rac, both after dose 1 and cumulatively over the entire treatment period (dose 1 in intent to treat [ITT] group: Lev 0.50 +/- 0.43 L, Rac 0.43 +/- 0.37 L; P = .02), particularly among the 60% of patients not on recent steroid therapy (dose 1: Lev 0.58 +/- 0.47 L, Rac 0.44 +/- 0.37 L; P < .01), and patients whose entry (S)-albuterol concentrations were in the highest quartile of those measured. A small and similar proportion of Lev-treated (7.0%) and Rac-treated (9.3%) patients required hospitalization (P = .28). Among patients not on steroids, fewer Lev- than Rac-treated patients required admission (3.8% vs 9.3%, P = .03), as was also the case for patients with high plasma (S)-albuterol concentrations. Asthma relapses (5% in 30 days) were lower than in previous reports and did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that early, regular nebulized beta(2)-agonist and systemic corticosteroid therapy may reduce hospitalization and relapse rates in patients with acute severe asthma. Lev was well tolerated and compared favorably with Rac in improving airway function, particularly in those who were not on inhaled or oral corticosteroids and in those who had high plasma (S)-albuterol concentrations at presentation.

Paradoxical Bronchospasm: A Potentially Life Threatening Adverse Effect of Albuterol

We report a case of paradoxical bronchospasm to both levalbuterol and albuterol. While the exact mechanism for this known adverse effect of albuterol is not known, awareness of this adverse effect can be life saving to the patient. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of paradoxical bronchospasm to levalbuterol inhalation solution.

Effects of (R)- and (S)-isomers of beta-adrenergic agonists on eosinophil response to interleukin-5

BACKGROUND

Racemic beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2-agonists) are used frequently to treat patients with asthma. Potential differences in the biological activities and clinical efficacies among racemic beta2-agonists and their isomers are controversial, and research into these possible differences is limited.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the (S)- and the (R)-isomers of beta2-agonists have opposing effects on the activation of inflammatory cells.

METHODS

Isolated human eosinophils were pretreated with 1:1 racemic (R,S)-, (R)- or (S)-albuterol, isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX), and stimulated with IL-5. The kinetics of superoxide production were examined by reduction of cytochrome c, and the effects of pharmacological agents on superoxide production were monitored for 180 min.

RESULTS

(R,S)-albuterol inhibited IL-5-induced superoxide production. This inhibition was enhanced by a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) phosphodiesterase inhibitor, IBMX, and was reversed by the selective beta2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, ICI 118, 551, verifying the involvement of both cAMP and the beta2-adrenergic receptor. In addition, (R)-albuterol alone, similarly to (R,S)-albuterol, significantly inhibited IL-5-induced superoxide production up to 60 min (P<0.05, n=4), but the inhibition was lost with longer incubation. In contrast, (S)-albuterol with IBMX did not inhibit IL-5-induced superoxide production before 60 min, but it significantly enhanced IL-5-mediated superoxide production after 60 min (P<0.05, n=4). When both were present as racemic (R,S)-albuterol, the inhibitory effect of (R)-albuterol was not affected by (S)-albuterol.

CONCLUSION

When incubated with IL-5-activated eosinophils, (R)-albuterol shows anti-inflammatory effects and (S)-albuterol shows pro-inflammatory effects in the presence of IBMX. The kinetics of these effects are different, and when used simultaneously, (R)-albuterol predominates. When marked usage of the (S)-isomer is anticipated, racemic (R,S)-albuterol should be used clinically with caution.

Comparison of racemic albuterol and levalbuterol in the treatment of acute asthma in the ED

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma is often treated with racemic albuterol, a 1:1 mixture of (R)-albuterol and (S)-albuterol. Levalbuterol is the single-isomer agent comprised (R)-albuterol, an active bronchodilator, without any effects of (S)-albuterol.

OBJECTIVE

To compare emergency department (ED) admission rates of patients presenting with acute asthma who were treated with either racemic albuterol or levalbuterol.

SETTING

Suburban community teaching hospital.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case review.

METHODS

Emergency department patients presenting with acute asthma at 2 different sites were reviewed over 9- and 3-month consecutive periods. Outcome measures included ED hospital admission rate, length of stay, arrival acuity, and treatment costs. Patients were excluded if younger than 1 year or if no treatment of acute asthma was rendered.

RESULTS

Of the initial 736 consecutive cases, significantly fewer admissions (4.7% vs 15.1%, respectively; P = .0016) were observed in the levalbuterol vs racemic albuterol group. Of the subsequent 186 consecutive cases, significantly fewer admissions were also observed (13.8% vs 28.9%, respectively; P = .021) in the levalbuterol vs racemic albuterol group. Treatment costs were lower with levalbuterol mainly because of a decrease in hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

Levalbuterol treatment in the ED for patients with acute asthma resulted in higher patient discharge rates and may be a cost-effective alternative to racemic albuterol.

Randomized placebo controlled assessment of airway inflammation due to racemic albuterol and levalbuterol via exhaled nitric oxide testing

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The S-stereoisomer found in racemic albuterol may have associated proinflammatory properties. We tested the hypothesis that airway inflammation as assessed by exhaled nitric oxide is no different in patients with COPD when using racemic albuterol relative to levalbuterol or placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Twelve mild to moderate COPD patients were assigned to five days each of nebulized racemic albuterol, levalbuterol, and saline placebo. Before and after each course of treatment, airway inflammation was assessed via exhaled nitric oxide breath testing. Secondary functional outcomes that were measured included spirometry, a functional assessment utilizing a six-minute walk, and symptoms score using the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in pre and post FeNO levels within and between treatment groups (p = 0.121). There were also no significant differences within or between treatment groups for the secondary outcome measurements of FEV1 (p = 0.913), functional assessment utilizing a six-minute walk (p = 0.838) and the symptom scores using Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (p = 0.500).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in mild to moderate COPD patients treated with racemic albuterol, levalbuterol or placebo for measurement of exhaled nitric oxide or the secondary outcomes that were measured.

Therapeutic responses in asthma and COPD. Bronchodilators

The presence of acute reversibility to bronchodilators does not distinguish asthma from COPD. Patients with either condition can benefit from bronchodilators, and should be given a trial to assess their response. Some respond with a change in lung volume with less hyperinflation; others improve their forced inspiratory flow and become much more comfortable. The combination of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled steroids is useful in both conditions. While anticholinergics seem to yield the best results in COPD, some patients with asthma benefit from their use. Tiotropium may be the most effective agent as monotherapy in COPD, but the combination of an inhaled steroid and a LABA may produce similar results in improving lung function. Long-acting bronchodilators are effective agents as monotherapy in COPD, but in asthma should be combined with a controller medication. Short-acting beta-agonists should be used intermittently in asthma, but may be used regularly or combined with an anticholinergic in COPD. The roles of stereoisomers, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors in asthma and COPD remain uncertain at this time.

A preliminary comparison of levalbuterol and albuterol in prehospital care

Nebulized levalbuterol has been documented as more efficacious than albuterol in enhancing airflow in Emergency Department (ED) patients with bronchospasm. This work attempts to determine if nebulized levalbuterol yields similar improvements in peak flow measurements as those produced by albuterol in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arena. All adult EMS patients given a nebulized beta-agonist from January to June 2000 were included in this prospective, before-and-after, open-label study. Data collected included demographics, initial peak expiratory flow (PF), and use of home inhaled or nebulized bronchodilators before EMS arrival (PRE-TX). Outcome variable was the change in PF after a single EMS treatment with one of the study agents. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test and chi-square techniques; p was defined as 0.05. There were 298 patients enrolled; complete data for analysis were available for 196. Mean age was 68.0 years; 44.4% were male. Overall, albuterol produced a PF change of 19.7%; levalbuterol yielded a change of 20.4% (p = 0.9). In contrast to ED data, levalbuterol and albuterol produces similar changes in PF in the prehospital setting. Explanations for this finding may be linked to the pharmacokinetics of single vs. dual isomer preparations, and to the time frames of EMS care. Further efforts correlating EMS and ED data may better define the use of levalbuterol in prehospital care.

(S)-Albuterol activates pro-constrictory and pro-inflammatory pathways in human bronchial smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

Pro-constrictory and proinflammatory properties of (S)-albuterol have been widely reported both under in vivo and in vitro conditions. However, underlying mechanisms are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We examined and compared the cellular effects of albuterol enantiomers on key intracellular molecules involved in constrictory and inflammatory pathways in human bronchial smooth muscle cells (hBSMCs).

METHODS

Primary hBSMCs were grown in culture and treated with various concentrations of albuterol enantiomers for various periods. Methacholine was used to stimulate cells. The expression and activity of Gs and Gi proteins, the intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i), the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3'-OH-kinase (PI3) kinase, and the transcriptional nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) level were examined.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the expression and activity of Gialpha-1 protein and a decrease in the expression of Gs protein in hBSMCs after 8 hours of treatment with (S)-albuterol. These effects of (S)-albuterol were observed in a dose-dependent manner. Nonreceptor-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase by forskolin was attenuated with (S)-albuterol. Treatment of the cells for 24 hours with (S)-albuterol significantly increased [Ca2+]i on stimulation with methacholine. Interestingly, the effect of (R)-albuterol was opposite to that of (S)-albuterol. The effect of the racemic albuterol in some cases was similar to that of (S)-albuterol. (S)-Albuterol significantly activated both PI3 kinase and NF-kappaB in hBSMCs.

CONCLUSION

These studies demonstrated an (S)-albuterol-induced increase in the expression and activity of pro-constrictory pathways involving Gialpha-1 protein and [Ca2+]i and a decrease in the activity of the bronchodilatory pathway involving Gs proteins in hBSNMCs. Additionally, (S)-albuterol activated proinflammatory pathways involving PI3 kinase and NF-kappaB. Because (S)-albuterol metabolizes at least 10-fold slower than (R)-albuterol and has a longer elimination half-life, these cellular effects of (S)-albuterol might explain the detrimental effect seen with chronic administration of racemic albuterol in the treatment of airway diseases, such as bronchial asthma.

Targeting the issues in chronic obstructive lung disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease of unclear aetiology and variable pathology among patients. Little is known about the cellular mechanisms which cause this condition and, although the incidence of COPD has been rising worldwide for some time, research efforts have only very recently increased. Medication thus far has focused on symptom treatment rather than targeting identifiable disease mechanisms. Such treatment has consisted primarily of bronchodilators, both beta-agonists and anticholinergic in action. Treatment with steroids has been disappointing, except in the case of acute exacerbation, and this has shifted the research focus to characterising the inflammatory process in COPD as distinct from that in asthma. New targets for pharmacotherapy are coming to light as information is gained about specific inflammatory mediators active in COPD and the role of oxidative stress in this disease. In addition, new approaches include describing the role of exogenous antiproteases in restoring the balance between protease-antiprotease mechanisms that may be defective in this disease. Ultimately, exploration of the molecular genetics of COPD will provide new targets for future pharmacological agents.

Levalbuterol: pharmacologic properties and use in the treatment of pediatric and adult asthma

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

To review the rationale supporting the use of levalbuterol [(R)-albuterol] for the treatment of pediatric and adult asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed articles, selected abstracts from studies presented at recent professional meetings, and the Xopenex [levalbuterol, (R)-albuterol; Sepracor, Marlborough, MA] Summary Basis of Approval and package insert.

STUDY SELECTION

Institutional review board-approved clinical study protocols.

RESULTS

Levalbuterol is a single isomer beta2-agonist that differs from racemic albuterol by elimination of (S)-albuterol. Levalbuterol is an effective bronchodilator whose primary mechanism of action is unimpeded by (S)-albuterol. Thus, when compared with racemic albuterol, clinically comparable bronchodilation can be achieved with doses that substantially lessen beta-mediated side effects. In chronic or acute treatment of asthma, this favorable therapeutic profile cannot apparently be duplicated by increasing or decreasing the dose of racemic albuterol or by the addition of anticholinergic agents such as ipratropium bromide.

CONCLUSIONS

Levalbuterol seems to provide efficacy and safety advantages in pediatric and adult patients suffering from asthma. Its use may afford a cost benefit as well. More clinical studies are required to extend these observations for use in the treatment of other pulmonary diseases in both adults and children and to determine levalbuterol's impact on long-term therapy of respiratory diseases.

Single-isomer levalbuterol: a review of the acute data

Levalbuterol, the pure (R)-isomer of racemic albuterol, is a new therapeutic option for patients with asthma. Racemic albuterol comprises a 50:50 mixture of (R)- and (S)-albuterol, with (R)-albuterol conferring all of the bronchodilator effects of the racemate. Numerous preclinical and in vitro studies have indicated that (S)-albuterol is not an inert isomer, but may have proinflammatory effects. Results from clinical trials in adults and children with asthma have demonstrated that 0.63 mg levalbuterol provides effective bronchodilation with lower b-mediated side effects compared with 2.5 mg racemic albuterol. In the emergency department, levalbuterol provided greater bronchodilation and significantly reduced hospital admissions compared with racemic albuterol. Recent studies have supported that levalbuterol use in acute settings may reduce the cost of asthma treatment by decreasing the total treatments and subsequent respiratory therapy resources. Levalbuterol provides heath care professionals with a safe, effective, and potentially cost-saving alternative to racemic albuterol for the treatment of patients with asthma.