Sustained symptomatic, functional, and hemodynamic benefit with the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist, sitaxsentan, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a 1-year follow-up study

Sitaxsentan for Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension

Objective:

To review the literature pertinent to the efficacy and safety of sitaxsentan, a selective endothelin (ET)-A receptor antagonist under evaluation for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Data Sources:

Articles were identified through searches of the MEDLINE (1966–November 2006) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–November 2006) databases, using the key words endothelin antagonist, pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, sitaxsentan, and TBC11251. Searches were limited to articles published in English.

Study Selection And Data Extraction:

Due to the limited number of articles on sitaxsentan, all studies captured in the search results were evaluated.

Data Synthesis:

Four studies of sitaxsentan in humans with PAH have been published to date. An uncontrolled open-label study and a randomized placebo-controlled study (STRIDE-1; Sitaxsentan to Relieve Impaired Exercise-1) showed sitaxsentan to improve exercise tolerance in patients with PAH, as evidenced by significant increases in the distance walked in 6 minutes. Significant hepatotoxicity developed in patients receiving sitaxsentan 300 mg. The benefits of sitaxsentan with respect to exercise tolerance and hemodynamics were sustained in a one year extension of the placebo-controlled study. The results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 2 doses of sitaxsentan with an open-label bosentan arm (STRIDE-2) suggested that only the 100 mg dose provided superior benefit in exercise tolerance and improvement in functional class. Treatment-related adverse effects were similar for all groups.

Conclusions:

Sitaxsentan appears to be superior to placebo in improving exercise tolerance in patients with PAH but may produce therapeutic outcomes similar to those of bosentan, a comparator agent. The optimal dose of sitaxsentan appears to be 100 mg once daily. Information about the use of sitaxsentan in a greater number of patients with PAH for longer periods is necessary to further define its place in the treatment of PAH.

Current state of endothelin receptor antagonism in hypertension and pulmonary hypertension

Endothelin 1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictive substance, was discovered in 1988 by Yanagisawa and colleagues, and since then, a quarter of a century has passed. Understanding the biology of ET-1 has rapidly developed by characterizing the components of its receptors and processing enzymes. Numerous studies have revealed not only physiological but also various pathophysiological roles of the ET system. At first, ET-1 was the attractive and promising target for the treatment of hypertension owing to its potent vasoconstrictive nature and a variety of ET receptor antagonists (ERAs) were studied. However, the clinical application to treat hypertension was disappointing because of the side effects, including liver toxicity and fluid retention. On the other hand, ERAs have been established as orphan drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and improved the prognosis of patients. Furthermore, multipotency of the ET system in the pathogenesis of multiple diseases has led to the development of translational research not only in the field of hypertension but in a variety of fields. Furthermore, a range of studies are ongoing to apply ERAs to clinical situations. In this article, we review the pathophysiological roles of the ET system in hypertension and pulmonary hypertension and the potential of ET receptor antagonism for the treatment of these diseases.

Iloprost for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare but serious and life-threatening disease that leads to right heart failure and death within 2.8 years without specific treatment. This review focuses on the stable prostacyclin analog iloprost, its biologic action and pharmacology and, finally, on its clinical development, efficacy and safety in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, which led to its approval for this indication. Furthermore, this review assesses the role of iloprost compared with other newly developed drugs, such as the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan and the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil, as well as other modes of application of prostacyclin and its analogs for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Based on the different modes of action of these substances, a combination of these treatments could be most promising for the future.

WHO Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension: current and investigative therapies

Major advances have been made in the treatment of World Health Organization Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the mid-1990s, nine medications have become available in the United States to target three key pathophysiologic derangements in PAH - the prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide pathways. As a group, these agents have led to improvements in functional capacity, symptoms, hemodynamics, and survival. Most patients with mild to moderate PAH are started on orally active agents such as endothelin receptor antagonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Patients with more severe disease, particularly those with evidence of right heart failure, should be treated with continuous prostacyclin infusion or a combination of a prostacyclin and oral therapy. Each medication has unique properties and clinical considerations, and the selection of an appropriate therapy must be tailored to the individual patient. None of the currently available WHO Group 1 PAH therapies are curative, however, and it is the hope that new therapies in development may halt or reverse disease progression. This review will discuss the major therapeutic classes of presently available medications and their role in managing the patient with PAH. We will also review data supporting the use of combination therapy, adjuvant background therapy, and new agents currently under investigation.

Safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

BACKGROUND

Sitaxsentan is a highly selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that was recently withdrawn by the manufacturer because of a pattern of idiosyncratic liver injury.

METHODS

Before sitaxsentan withdrawal, this 18-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized patients with PAH to receive placebo or sitaxsentan 50 or 100 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 18. Changes in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and time to clinical worsening (TTCW) were secondary endpoints. The primary efficacy analysis was powered for sitaxsentan 100 mg versus placebo.

RESULTS

Of 98 randomized patients, 61% were WHO functional class II at baseline. Improvement from baseline to week 18 in 6MWD occurred with sitaxsentan 100 but not 50 mg; a strong placebo effect was observed. At week 18, WHO functional class was improved or maintained in more patients receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg than placebo (P = 0.038); 0% versus 12% of patients deteriorated, respectively. TTCW was not significantly different for 100-mg sitaxsentan patients than placebo (P = 0.090). Adverse events (AEs) occurring more frequently with sitaxsentan (50 or 100 mg) included headache, peripheral edema, dizziness, nausea, extremity pain, and fatigue; most AEs were of mild or moderate severity.

CONCLUSION

Sitaxsentan 100 mg improved functional class but not 6MWD in PAH patients who were mostly WHO functional class II at baseline. No patient receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg experienced clinical worsening; sitaxsentan was well tolerated.

Long-term pulmonary hemodynamic effects of ambrisentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The long-term effects of endothelin receptor antagonists on pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are not well studied. This post hoc analysis examined changes in pulmonary hemodynamics in a cohort of patients with PAH who underwent follow-up right heart catheterization (RHC) in a long-term ambrisentan study (ARIES-E). A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent RHC after >3 months of ambrisentan therapy. Changes from baseline in mean PAP, mean right atrial pressure, cardiac index, and PVR were assessed and correlations between these hemodynamic changes and exercise capacity were examined. Sixty-eight patients who received ambrisentan in the ARIES studies had ≥1 follow-up RHC while receiving ambrisentan. Fifty-eight patients were on ambrisentan alone at the time of the first RHC. Median time from initiation of ambrisentan therapy to follow-up RHC was 60 weeks (range 14 to 158). Significant improvements compared to baseline were observed for mean PAP (-7.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.0 to -5.1), PVR (-266 dyne × s/cm(5), 95% CI -350 to -180), and cardiac index (0.4 L/min/m(2), 95% CI 0.2 to 0.6 L/min/m(2)); for patients on ambrisentan alone, changes in mean PAP and PVR were inversely correlated with change from baseline 6-minute walking distance (r = -0.41 and -0.43, respectively, p <0.001 for the 2 comparisons) at time of follow-up RHC. In conclusion, ambrisentan may provide sustained improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with PAH who receive long-term treatment and these changes correlate with improvements in exercise capacity.

Inhaled treprostinil and pulmonary arterial hypertension

Multiple conditions result in development of pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the subclassification of pulmonary hypertension, in which known or unknown underlying conditions lead to similar intrinsic alterations in the pulmonary vasculature. PAH is a progressive condition characterized by restricted blood flow through the pulmonary circulation leading to poor survival in the absence of effective therapy. Over the last two decades, new therapeutic agents have substantially improved the course and prognosis for PAH patients. Three available classes of drugs, ie, prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors provide multiple options for treatment of PAH. Endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors are administered orally, whereas prostacyclin therapies are delivered by continuous intravenous or subcutaneous infusion, or as aerosols by nebulization. Because of the risks and inconveniences associated with administration, prostacyclins are typically reserved for patients with more advanced disease or progression despite oral therapy. Inhaled administration may be a safer and easier route for prostacyclin administration. Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analog that has been demonstrated to be effective when administered by continuous subcutaneous or intravenous infusion, and more recently by nebulization.

Sitaxsentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening, progressive condition that eventually leads to right heart failure. Endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRAs) have been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment for PAH. Sitaxsentan is a highly selective oral ETRA that, in clinical trials, has demonstrated significant improvements in exercise capacity, functional class and pulmonary hemodynamics in PAH. Sitaxsentan has been shown to be a well tolerated and effective agent with a durable response for the treatment of PAH, and is associated with a low incidence of liver toxicity.

Hemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): do they explain long-term clinical outcomes with PAH-specific therapy?

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has witnessed dramatic treatment advances over the past decade. However, with the exception of epoprostenol, data from short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not shown a benefit of these drugs on survival. There remains a need to differentiate between available therapies and current endpoint responses which in turn, could be used to guide treatment selection and provide long-term prognostic information for patients.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for RCTs of PAH-specific therapy published between January 1980 and May 2009. Articles were selected if they contained a placebo comparator and described hemodynamic changes from baseline. We applied the weighted mean change in hemodynamic variables to the equation developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Registry to estimate long-term survival with each therapy.

Results

Ten RCTs involving 1,635 patients met the inclusion criteria. Suitable hemodynamic data were identified for bosentan, sitaxentan, sildenafil, epoprostenol, beraprost and treprostinil. 77.6% of patients were female and the mean (SD) age was 46.5 ± 4.9 years. 55.5% of patients had idiopathic PAH (iPAH), 23.9% PAH related to connective tissue disease, and 18.2% PAH related to congenital heart disease. Based on the effects observed in short-term trials and, relative to placebo, all analyzed therapies improved survival. The estimated 1-year survival was 78.4%, 77.8%, 76.1%, 75.8%, 75.2%, and 74.1% for epoprostenol, bosentan, treprostinil, sitaxentan, sildenafil, and beraprost, respectively. These estimates are considerably lower than the 1-year observed survival reported in several open-label and registry studies with PAH-specific therapies: 88% - 97%.

Conclusion

When applied to the NIH Registry equation, hemodynamic changes from baseline appear to underestimate the survival benefits observed with long-term PAH therapy.

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in neonates and children with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

This article aims to review recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in neonates and children with congenital heart disease.

DATA SOURCES

Articles on pulmonary arterial hypertension in congenital heart disease were retrieved from PubMed and MEDLINE published after 1958.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of primary (or idiopathic) pulmonary arterial hypertension is made when no known risk factor is identified. Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease constitutes a heterogenous group of conditions and has been characterized by congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Despite the similarities in histologic appearance of pulmonary vascular disease, there are differences between pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and those with other conditions with respect to pathophysiology, therapeutic strategies, and prognosis. Revision and subclassification within the category of secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension based on pathophysiology were conducted to improve specific treatments. The timing of surgical repair is crucial to prevent and minimize risk of postoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension. Drug therapies including prostacyclin, endothelin-receptor antagonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and nitric oxide have been evolved with promising results in neonates and children.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the different forms of congenital heart diseases, an early correction generally prevents subsequent development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Emerging therapies for treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension also improve quality of life and survival in neonates and children with congenital heart disease associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart and lung transplantation or lung transplantation in combination with repair of the underlying cardiac defect is a therapeutic option in a minority of patients. Partial repair options are also beneficial in some selected cases. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these therapies including survival and long-term outcome.

Optimizing endothelin receptor antagonist use in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Endothelin receptor antagonism has emerged as an important therapeutic approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Bench to bedside scientific research has shown that endothelin-1 (ET-1) is overexpressed in several forms of pulmonary vascular disease and may play an important pathogenetic role in the development and progression of PAH. Oral endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) improved exercise capacity, functional status, pulmonary hemodymanics, and delayed the time to clinical worsening in several randomized placebo-controlled trials. Two ERAs are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: bosentan, a dual ERA for patients with class III and IV PAH, and ambrisentan, a selective ERA for patients with class II and III PAH. Sitaxsentan, another selective ERA, has been approved in Europe, Canada, and Australia. The objective of this review is to evaluate the available evidence describing the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability, and patient-focused perspectives regarding the different types of endothelin receptor antagonists. Ongoing and forthcoming randomized trials are also highlighted including the approach of combining this class of drugs with other drugs that target different cellular pathways believed to be etiologically important in PAH.

Review: Therapeutic advances in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by vasoconstriction, in situ thrombosis, and vascular remodeling of small pulmonary arteries inducing increased pulmonary arterial resistance. Conventional treatment is based on life style modification and nonspecific treatment (warfarine, diuretics, oxygen). Calcium channel blockers are vasodilatators that have been shown to be of great efficacy in a very specific subpopulation of patients with PAH. For the majority of patients, specific PAH therapies are still lacking. Numerous studies evaluating prostacyclin agonists, endothelin-receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are now available to guide therapeutic choices. Despite those important advances there is still no cure for PAH. Fortunately, research is ongoing and many drugs show promises.

Inhibition of endothelin receptors in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: does selectivity matter?

Treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have considerably improved in the past few years. Endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonism has been established as a first-line option for the majority of PAH patients. Endothelin-receptor antagonists (ETRAs) comprise sulfonamide and non-sulfonamide agents with different affinities for ET-receptor subtypes (ET_A and ET_B), and the focus of development has shifted from drugs with less selectivity to those with high selectivity. There is ongoing debate as to whether selective or non-selective ET-receptor antagonism is more beneficial in the treatment of PAH. This paper reviews the current evidence from experimental and clinical studies obtained from a thorough literature search focusing on the three marketed drugs bosentan, sitaxentan, and ambrisentan. A clinically meaningful difference among the three approved ETRAs with respect to their ET-receptor selectivity could not be demonstrated to date. Therefore, in clinical practice, other features are likely to be of greater relevance when considering treatment, such as the potential for serious drug–drug interactions, convenience of dosing schedule, or rates of limiting side effects. These characteristics bear more relation to the chemical or pharmacological properties of the drugs than to receptor selectivity itself.

Effects of the selective endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist Clazosentan on cerebral perfusion and cerebral oxygenation following severe subarachnoid hemorrhage - preliminary results from a randomized clinical series

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of clazosentan, a new selective endothelin receptor subtype A antagonist, on cerebral perfusion and cerebral oxygenation following severe aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH).

METHODS

All 12 patients treated at our institution in the context of a phase IIa, multicenter, randomized trial on clazosentan's safety and efficacy in reducing the incidence of angiographic cerebral vasospasm were included in this substudy. The phase IIa study (n = 34) consisted of two parts: a double-blind, randomized Part A (clazosentan 0.2 mg/kg/h versus placebo) and an open-label Part B (clazosentan 0.4 mg/kg/h for 12 h followed by 0.2 mg/kg/h) for patients with established vasospasm. In parallel to the phase IIa study protocol, which included assessment of vasospasm by angiography and transcranial Doppler sonography, we determined regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), cerebrovascular resistance, and regional tissue oxygenation.

RESULTS

Cerebral perfusion was comparable between treatment groups during the early post-bleeding period (rCBF placebo, 22.6 +/- 3.5 ml/100 g/min versus rCBF clazosentan, 23.9 +/- 1.1 ml/100 g/min). By the time of control angiography (day 8 after aSAH), rCBF decreased by 50% in the placebo group (11.3 +/- 6.7 ml/ 100 g/min) while it remained stable in the clazosentan group (23.5 +/- 12.9 ml/100 g/min). During Part B of the study, all 3 patients who developed haemodynamically relevant vasospasm during placebo treatment, showed a sustained improvement in rCBF upon conversion to clazosentan.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest that clazosentan reduces the extent of vasospasm-associated impairment of cerebral perfusion following aSAH. Furthermore, clazosentan may exert beneficial actions on overt vasospasm-associated hypoperfusion.

Current therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature, characterized by relentless deterioration and death. Patients with PAH are known to be at increased risk for anesthetic complications and surgical morbidity and mortality. However, outcomes in patients have improved with the recent development of new drug therapies. The 3 major drug classes for treatment of PAH are prostanoids, endothelin-receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. In this review, the authors provide an overview of each drug class, its mechanism of action, indications, and current supportive literature. Surgical and interventional treatments of PAH, including atrial septostomy, pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, and transplantation, are briefly reviewed, and the rationale, indications, and selection criteria for each are discussed. Although available medical and surgical therapies for PAH have improved patient outcomes, acute decompensated right heart failure (RHF) remains a common and challenging complication of PAH. The authors review this topic and provide an outline of the general pathophysiology of RHF and an approach to its management.

Endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The recognition that endothelin-1 contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension has led to the development of clinically useful endothelin receptor antagonists that improve symptoms and functional capacity and alter the natural history of the disease in a beneficial way. The antagonists have varying degrees of selectivity for the two classes of endothelin receptor, termed ETA and ETB, and the varying degrees may translate into clinical differences. Endothelin receptor antagonists have become an integral part of therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension, and the indications for their use are expanding.

Analyzing the short-term effect of placebo therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: potential implications for the design of future clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Placebo is commonly used in short-term randomized trials for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Currently, outcome data regarding placebo are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and performed a metaanalysis to assess its effect.

METHODS

Articles were identified via a query of MEDLINE and EMBASE using the following terms: "pulmonary hypertension"; "clinical trial"; "six minute walk"; "pulmonary hemodynamic"; and "survival." A manual bibliography search of selected trials, reviews, and guidelines was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized, placebo-controlled with data reported at baseline and at 12 to 18 weeks. Two reviewers independently abstracted: 6-min walk distance, pulmonary hemodynamic measures and frequency of death, clinical worsening, and change in New York Heart Association/World Health Organization functional class. The data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 688 articles identified met the inclusion criteria (a total of 868 placebo-treated patients). After 12 to 18 weeks, the 6-min walk distance decreased by 8.4 m (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.6 to -2.2) and pulmonary vascular resistance increased by 58.9 dyne (.) s (.) cm(-5) (95% CI, 27.6 to 90.1). Placebo-treated patients were 1.81 times more likely to experience a clinical worsening (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.53). Placebo treatment was not associated with a difference in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PAH who receive placebo are more likely to experience clinical deteriorations. Further debate is needed regarding the design of future clinical trials. Research efforts should focus on evaluating existing medications against one another and comparing novel therapies with currently accepted ones.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Sitaxsentan in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosing and administration of the endothelin receptor antagonist, sitaxsentan, and its role in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are reviewed.

SUMMARY

PAH is a serious and potentially devastating chronic disorder of the pulmonary circulation. Bosentan is the first and only approved endothelin receptor antagonist for the treatment of PAH. Endothelin-1, a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor and smooth-muscle mitogen, has been shown to be overexpressed in the plasma and lung tissue of patients with PAH; the reduction or blockade of entothelin-1 may aid in disease symptomatology and progression. Activation of ET(A) leads to vasoconstriction and vascular smooth-muscle-cell proliferation. Sitaxsentan is an orally active, organic nonpeptide that binds competitively to the ET(A) receptor. Sitaxsentan, unlike bosentan, has a high affinity for the ET(A) receptor. In one trial, sitaxsentan was compared with placebo, and the results suggested that sitaxsentan was more effective than placebo. A 12-week, open-label trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan in 20 patients. The Sitaxsentan to Relieve Impaired Exercise (STRIDE-1) trial randomized patients to receive placebo, sitaxsentan 100 mg orally once daily, or sitaxsentan 300 mg orally once daily. Significant improvements in exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics were demonstrated. The results of STRIDE-2, the second randomized sitaxsentan trial, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 100 mg sitaxsentan and the unacceptable safety profile of 300 mg sitaxsentan.

CONCLUSION

Sitaxsentan is an orally administered endothelin receptor blocker that offers the effective and safe treatment of patients with mild to moderate PAH.

Sitaxentan

Sitaxentan is a highly selective endothelin (ET)(A) receptor antagonist, with an approximately 6500 higher affinity for ET(A) than ET(B) receptors. In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), elevated ET-1 levels are strongly correlated with disease severity and prognosis. Sitaxentan 100 mg once daily was efficacious in the management of moderate to severe PAH in the pivotal, 12-18 week, large (n > or = 98), well designed, placebo-controlled STRIDE-1, -2 and -4 trials. In the STRIDE-1 and -2 trials (the majority of patients had New York Heart Association [NYHA]/WHO functional class III PAH), sitaxentan-treated patients experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline in distance walked over 6 minutes (6MWD; primary endpoint in STRIDE-2) and in NYHA/WHO functional class than placebo recipients. In STRIDE-4, although there was no between-group difference in terms of improvements in 6MWD in the primary analysis of patients across all WHO functional classes (61% were functional class II) [primary endpoint], improvements in 6MWD significantly favoured sitaxentan versus placebo-treated patients in a post hoc subgroup analysis of those with WHO functional class III or IV disease. The beneficial effects of sitaxentan therapy on exercise capacity and NYHA/WHO functional class were maintained after up to 2 years' treatment. Treatment with sitaxentan for up to 2 years was generally well tolerated in clinical trials.

Dual ET(A)/ET(B) vs. selective ET(A) endothelin receptor antagonism in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Since the identification of endothelin as a key mediator in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the pharmacologic control of the activated endothelin system with endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) has been a major therapeutic achievement for the treatment of patients with PAH. To date, dual ET(A)/ET(B) and selective ET(A) receptor antagonists have clinically been evaluated. To answer the question of whether selective or dual ETRA is preferable in patients with PAH, experimental and clinical data with relevance to the pulmonary circulation are reviewed in this article. Whereas experimental and clinical data provide unambiguous evidence that ET(A) receptors mediate the detrimental effects of ET-1, such as vasoconstriction and cell proliferation, the elucidation of the role of ET(B) receptors has been more complex. It has been shown that there is a subpopulation of ET(B) receptors on smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts mediating vasoconstriction and proliferation. On the contrary, there is clear evidence that endothelial ET(B) receptors continue to mediate vasodilation, vasoprotection and ET-1 clearance despite the pathology associated with pulmonary hypertension. More difficult to assess is the net effect of these mechanisms in patients to be treated with ETRA. When considering the available data from controlled clinical trials, nonselectivity does not appear to carry a relevant clinical benefit for the treatment of patients with PAH when compared with selective ET(A) receptor antagonism.

Sitaxsentan: a novel endothelin-A receptor antagonist for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Sitaxsentan is an orally active, selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that may benefit patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension by blocking the vasoconstrictive effects of endothelin-A receptors, while maintaining the vasodilator and endothelin-1 clearance functions of the endothelin-B receptors. In its first randomized, placebo-controlled study, sitaxsentan improved exercise capacity assessed by the 6-min walk test, New York Heart Association functional class, cardiac index and pulmonary vascular resistance in New York Heart Association Class II, III and IV patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension related to connective tissue disease or congenital heart disease. Although doses of 100 and 300 mg once daily demonstrated equivalent efficacy, the lower dose had a better safety profile. Additional studies are ongoing to assess the relative safety and efficacy of 50 and 100 mg once-daily dosing. The most common side effects include rhinitis, headache, peripheral edema, chest pain, nausea, constipation, increased prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (in patients on warfarin), flushing and insomnia. As with other endothelin receptor antagonists, increases in hepatic transaminases have been observed with sitaxsentan. Initial studies using the selective oral endothelin-A receptor antagonist sitaxsentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients have revealed a favorable risk-benefit therapeutic profile with the 100 mg once-daily dose.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Pulmonary arterial hypertension can be classified into five categories according to Venice classification: (1) Idiopathic PAH; (2) Familial PAH; (3) PAH associated with collagen vascular disease, congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, portal hypertension, HIV infection, drugs and toxins or other (thyroid disorders, glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, hemoglobinopathies, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy); (4) PAH associated with significant venous or capillary involvement, which includes pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH); (5) Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. PAH can also be secondary to chronic hypoxic lung disease as part of the "cor-pulmonale" syndrome, and also secondary to left sided heart disease, but these conditions are usually distinguished from those listed here.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out using the CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) were selected by two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected studies; assessed study quality; and extracted data. We analysed outcomes as continuous and dichotomous data.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated version of the review, we added two RCTs. Altogether, five RCTs met the entry criteria of the review (reporting eight group comparisons). The studies were of short duration (12-16 weeks), recruiting a total of 482 participants. Three studies compared a non-selective ERA (bosentan) with placebo, one compared bosentan with sildenafil (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) , and one compared a selective ERA (sitaxsentan) with placebo. Over a 12-16 week period ERAs improved exercise capacity, improve Borg dyspnoea score, some measures of cardiopulmonary haemodynamics (pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index) in symptomatic patients with mainly idiopathic PAH. The effect of ERAs on mortality was not significant. The most severe side effect, hepatic toxicity, was not common.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ERAs in conjunction with conventional therapy over 12 to 16 weeks can improve exercise capacity, Borg dyspnoea scores and several cardiopulmonary haemodynamics variables in patients mainly with idiopathic PAH. The data on mortality do not currently show a benefit of this class of drugs on this endpoint. Additional assessment of this outcome is important in order to establish whether there is evidence that ERAs have an impact on the risk of death. Longer studies are required.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is the most severe of all connective tissue diseases. The distinctive pathogenic process involves sequential or concomitant abnormalities in blood vessel function, immunity and, ultimately, fibroblast function. These specific characteristics may explain the results of treatment evaluations. The decrease in excess mortality shown in recent studies seems chiefly ascribable to the use of cardiovascular drugs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are effective in resolving renal crisis, prostacyclins and endothelin antagonists improve pulmonary hypertension, and calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors benefit patients with myocardial involvement. On the other hand, immunomodulatory drugs and other agents investigated for their disease-modifying potential failed to influence skin fibrosis in controlled trials. Trials of immunosuppressants are ongoing. Available results indicate that emphasis should be put on cardiovascular drugs. The development of criteria for disease activity and severity would facilitate future research on the treatment of systemic sclerosis.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Sitaxsentan: an endothelin-A receptor antagonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Endothelin (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor and smooth muscle mitogen that mediates its effects through activation of ET-A and ET-B receptors. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by inappropriate overactivation of the ET system. There is clear evidence that strategies that block both ET receptors are associated with clinical improvement in PAH. However, there are theoretical physiological advantages to treatments that specifically inhibit only the ET-A receptor. Sitaxsentan is an orally active selective ET-A receptor antagonist that in recent clinical trials has demonstrated improvements in exercise capacity, functional class and haemodynamics in PAH patients with modified New York Heart Association class II, III and IV symptoms.

Treatment of pulmonary hypertension with selective pulmonary vasodilators

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vasodilators are important in the management of pulmonary hypertension. Although systemic vasodilators may be effective in lowering pulmonary artery pressure, systemic vasodilation is the main limitation to dose titration. This review summarizes the latest research and developments in pulmonary vasodilators in the management of acute and chronic pulmonary hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nitric oxide, the prototype of selective pulmonary vasodilators, remains an effective option in the management of pulmonary hypertension; however, cost and complexity of administration have led to consideration of other pulmonary vasodilators. Animal research suggests that nitric oxide may have an important role in the prevention of pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass. Experience with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy, suggests that these agents improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and can be considered as alternatives and/or adjuncts to nitric oxide. Prostacyclins are a versatile class of pulmonary vasodilator as they have been shown to improve pulmonary hemodynamics administered intravenously or via inhalation. Endothelin receptor antagonists have been shown to be effective for long-term management of pulmonary hypertension. Several gene therapy strategies are currently undergoing evaluation.

SUMMARY

Selective pulmonary vasodilation can be achieved through delivery of vasodilators directly to the lungs or targeting pulmonary specific processes. Several therapeutic options are available that demonstrate selectivity for the pulmonary vasculature. These agents can facilitate optimization of cardiopulmonary hemodynamics.

Drug Insight: endothelin-receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic rheumatic diseases

Rapid advances in the understanding of endothelin as a naturally occurring peptide with developmental and regulatory roles in normal physiology, along with a number of deleterious effects under pathologic conditions (including vasoconstriction, fibrosis, vascular hypertrophy, and inflammation) have led to the development of endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs). Bosentan, an antagonist with dual specificity for the endothelin-receptor subtypes A and B, has been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in placebo-controlled clinical trials and is now approved in many countries, including the US, Canada, and Europe, for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), including PAH associated with rheumatic diseases. ERAs with specificity for the endothelin-receptor subtype A, including sitaxsentan and ambrisentan, are currently undergoing investigation. This article reviews PAH associated with systemic rheumatic diseases and describes the role of ERAs in this setting.

Current treatment strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease characterized by an elevation in pulmonary artery pressure that can lead to right ventricular failure and death. Although there is no cure for PAH, newer medical therapies have been shown to improve a variety of clinically relevant end-points including survival, exercise tolerance, functional class, haemodynamics, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life measures. Since the introduction of continuous intravenous prostacyclin, the treatment armamentarium of approved drugs for PAH has expanded to include prostacyclin analogues with differing routes of administration, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor. Selective endothelin-A receptor antagonists have shown promise in clinical trials and are likely to be added to the list of options. As the number of medications available for PAH continues to increase, treatment decisions regarding first-line therapy, combination treatments, and add-on strategies are becoming more complex. This article reviews the current treatments strategies for PAH and provides guidelines for its management.