Transition to an oral anticoagulant in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Use of Edoxaban for the Treatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse drug reaction of heparin therapy, which increases a patient's risk of developing venous and/or arterial thromboembolism. HIT should be treated through discontinuation of heparin and administration of nonheparin anticoagulants such as argatroban. For long-term anticoagulation, parenteral nonheparin anticoagulants are generally converted to oral treatment with a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin. Although administration of warfarin is recommended to overlap with a nonheparin anticoagulant for a minimum of 5 days, overlapping with argatroban and warfarin presents high risks of bleeding. We describe a case of HIT treated with edoxaban. A 78-year-old man underwent surgery for esophageal cancer and was administered heparin perioperatively. After surgery, he was diagnosed with HIT and venous thromboembolism. We immediately stopped heparin and initiated parenteral argatroban. The patient was subsequently started on edoxaban without any overlap between the two drugs. The treatment was successful. The treatment of edoxaban following argatroban for HIT could reduce bleeding complications and shorten the length of hospital stay. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of edoxaban for HIT treatment.

Antithrombotic medications in dialysis patients: a double-edged sword

In the clinical context of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), thrombosis and bleeding risks are simultaneously increased and may have devastating consequences. While anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are indispensable for the prevention of thromboembolic events, the significantly higher bleeding risk makes their handling extremely complicated. In ESRD, they are frequently administered for a wide array of conditions. For example, atrial fibrillation is quite common in ESRD and warrants the use of anticoagulants like warfarin. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins are typically used for clotting prevention in the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit. The antithrombotics use dilemma has worsened because ESRD patients have been excluded from major clinical trials that defined standard indications, contraindications and optimal management of these medications. That limits our knowledge and results in that the process of decision-making depends on weaker data. Besides the substantial bleeding risk, warfarin may also increase cardiovascular risk because it is implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular calcifications in ESRD. The present article attempts to offer a comprehensive overview of practical considerations for the use of the most common antithrombotic medications in ESRD linking them, at the same time, to the best available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients with systemic vasculitis and pulmonary haemorrhage

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively uncommon but potentially fatal complication of the use of heparin in haemodialysis. It is associated with a risk of venous and arterial thrombosis due to the formation of a heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody. Early recognition and immediate treatment of HIT are crucial to reduce the morbidity and mortality rate. Here, we report two patients with acute kidney injury due to anti-glomerular membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis respectively who developed haemoptysis and pulmonary haemorrhage complicated by HIT. We discuss the diagnostic and management challenges of such patients.

A review of current agents for anticoagulation for the critical care practitioner

There has been a tremendous boom in the arena of anticoagulant therapy recently. Although the indications for these agents reside in the noncritical care environment, over time, the impact of these agents have infiltrated the critical care environment particularly due to devastating complications with associated use. With so many newer agents on the market or coming down the pipeline, it is easy to become overwhelmed. It is important that the critical care practitioner does not ignore these agents but becomes familiar with them to better prepare for the management of patients on one or more anticoagulant agents in the intensive care unit. To equip the critical care practitioners with the knowledge about commonly used anticoagulants, we provide an extensive review of the pharmacology, indications, and adverse effects related to these agents as well as suggestions on preventing or managing complications.

Successful management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using argatroban in a very old woman: a case report

Thrombosis due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rare but has a severe prognosis. Its management is not always easy, particularly in old patients with renal insufficiency. A 95-year-old woman was hospitalized for dyspnea. Curative treatment with unfractionated heparin was started because pulmonary embolism was suspected. Disseminated intravascular coagulation was then suspected because of thrombocytopenia, hypoprothrombinemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and a positive ethanol gelation test. The first immunoassay for HIT was negative. On the 12th day of hospitalization, bilateral cyanosis of the toes occurred associated with recent deep bilateral venous and arterial thrombosis at duplex ultrasound. New biological tests confirmed HIT and led us to stop heparin and to start argatroban with a positive clinical and biological evolution. Venous and arterial thrombosis associated with thrombocytopenia during heparin treatment must be considered HIT whatever the biological test results are. Argatroban is a good alternative treatment in the elderly.

Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

This article describes the pharmacology of approved parenteral anticoagulants. These include the indirect anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid, as well as the direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a unique pentasaccharide sequence and catalyze the inactivation of thrombin, factor Xa, and other clotting enzymes. Heparin also binds to cells and plasma proteins other than antithrombin causing unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and triggering nonhemorrhagic side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. LMWHs have greater inhibitory activity against factor Xa than thrombin and exhibit less binding to cells and plasma proteins than heparin. Consequently, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, have a longer half-life than heparin, and are associated with a lower risk of nonhemorrhagic side effects. LMWHs can be administered once daily or bid by subcutaneous injection, without coagulation monitoring. Based on their greater convenience, LMWHs have replaced UFH for many clinical indications. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, catalyzes the inhibition of factor Xa, but not thrombin, in an antithrombin-dependent fashion. Fondaparinux binds only to antithrombin. Therefore, fondaparinux-associated HIT or osteoporosis is unlikely to occur. Fondaparinux exhibits complete bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, has a longer half-life than LMWHs, and is given once daily by subcutaneous injection in fixed doses, without coagulation monitoring. Three additional parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and danaparoid are approved as alternatives to heparin in patients with HIT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

In the last 7 decades heparin has remained the most commonly used anticoagulant. Its use is increasing, mainly due to the increase in the number of vascular interventions and aging population. The most feared complication of heparin use is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is a clinicopathologic hypercoagulable, procoagulant prothrombotic condition in patients on heparin therapy, and decrease in platelet count by 50% or to less than 100,000, from 5 to 14 days of therapy. This prothrombotic hypercoagulable state in HIT patient is due to the combined effect of various factors, such as platelet activation, mainly the formation of PF4/heparin/IgG complex, stimulation of the intrinsic factor, and loss of anticoagulant effect of heparin. Diagnosis of HIT is done by clinical condition, heparin use, and timing of thrombocytopenia, and it is confirmed by either serotonin release assay or ELISA assay. Complications of HIT are venous/arterial thrombosis, skin gangrene, and acute platelet activation syndrome. Stopping heparin is the basic initial treatment, and Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) are medication of choice in these patients. A few routine but essential procedures performed by using heparin are hemodialysis, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, and Cardiopulmonary Bypass; but it cannot be used if a patient develops HIT. HIT patients with unstable angina, thromboembolism, or indwelling devices, such as valve replacement or intraaortic balloon pump, will require alternative anticoagulation therapy. HIT can be prevented significantly by keeping heparin therapy shorter, avoiding bovine heparin, using low-molecular weight heparin, and stopping heparin use for flush and heparin lock.

Pharmacist-Managed Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Protocol Improves Care of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Use of direct-thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) for the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging. A pharmacist-managed DTI protocol was implemented to standardize and improve the care of patients with HIT. A background study that compared DTI protocol–treated patients to those who did not receive treatment with the DTI protocol found that significantly more of the DTI protocol–treated patients received care that was consistent with level 1 guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (41% vs 0%). Because outcomes were poor regardless of whether the DTI protocol was used, the protocol was revised to require pharmacist implementation and oversight. A follow-up study compared DTI protocol patients from the background study (non-pharmacist-managed) to the pharmacist-managed DTI protocol group. There were significantly fewer dosing errors, improved nursing documentation, and less reexposure to heparin when the pharmacist was responsible for managing the DTI protocol. A trend toward reduced bleeding was noted. The management of patients with HIT is complex, and there are a number of pitfalls that may lead to poor outcomes. DTIs are high-risk medications that require careful dosing and monitoring to minimize risk for adverse drug events. A DTI protocol may improve care of patients with HIT, and pharmacist oversight of DTI use can help to reduce risk for errors and adverse medication events.

Therapeutic approaches to secondary immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Secondary thrombocytopenia is similar to primary or idiopathic thrombocytopenia (ITP) in that it is characterized by reduced platelet production or increased platelet destruction resulting in platelet levels<60,000/microL. Thrombocytopenia can occur from secondary causes associated with chronic disorders or with disturbed immune function due to chronic infections, lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders, pregnancy, or autoimmune disorders. Diagnosis of secondary ITP in some cases is complex, and the thrombocytopenia can often be resolved by treating the underlying disorder to the extent this is possible. In most cases, treatment is focused on reducing platelet destruction, but, in some cases, treatment may also be directed at stimulating platelet production. The most problematic cases of thrombocytopenia may be seen in pregnant women. This review will address various agents and their utility in treating ITP from secondary causes; in addition, thrombocytopenia in pregnancy, ITP in immunodeficiency conditions, and drug-induced thrombocytopenia will be discussed. Unlike primary ITP, treatment often must be tailored to the specific circumstance underlying the secondary ITP, even if the condition itself is incurable.

Review: Recent Advances in Argatroban-Warfarin Transition in Patients With Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a devastating, life-threatening, immune-mediated complication of therapy with unfractionated heparin, and less frequently, with low molecular weight heparin. Direct thrombin inhibitors are now standard therapy for the prevention of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Argatroban, a small synthetic molecule that inhibits thrombin at its active site, is increasingly used as the direct thrombin inhibitors of choice. Transition to longer term oral anticoagulation needs to be instituted after the platelet count has risen, because of the persistent risk of thrombosis. Although guidelines available in the literature outline the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, they are not presented in a concise and comprehensive manner easily followed by physicians. This article reviews current recommendations, relevant studies, and clinical management trials carried out on patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and provides updated, detailed guidelines for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with emphasis on a key part of the management, the argatroban—warfarin transition.

Prolonged anticoagulation after discontinuation of argatroban and warfarin therapy in an obese patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A 32-year-old, morbidly obese African-American woman developed bilateral pulmonary emboli 12 days after undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Three days later, after receiving heparin and warfarin, she developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT-II). An argatroban 1.5-microg/kg/minute infusion was administered for approximately 2.5 days. The patient also received four doses of warfarin, totaling 37.5 mg. The argatroban infusion was discontinued early on hospital day 6, at which time the patient's international normalized ratio (INR) was 4.36 and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 85.9 seconds. Her INR and aPTT values continued to rise after the argatroban was discontinued and peaked 3 days later at 5.28 and 123.6 seconds, respectively. At this time her platelet count had improved from 139 x 10(3)/mm(3) to 543 x 10(3)/mm(3). No additional warfarin was administered before discharge. On hospital day 11, the patient was discharged home with an INR of 4.12 and an aPTT of 67.1 seconds. Her aPTT and INR values remained elevated for 19 days after receiving her last dose of warfarin and for 20 days after argatroban discontinuation. She experienced no bleeding complications from these supratherapeutic coagulation parameters. She resumed treatment with warfarin as an outpatient and completed a 6-month course of anticoagulation without further incident. Clinicians should be aware that coagulation parameters may remain elevated longer than expected after argatroban discontinuation in certain patients taking concomitant warfarin. Patients with liver dysfunction and obesity appear most likely to be affected.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critical care setting: Diagnosis and management^

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a common occurrence in critical illness, reported in up to 41% of patients. Systematic evaluation of thrombocytopenia in critical care is essential to accurate identification and management of the cause. Although sepsis and hemodilution are more common etiologies of thrombocytopenia in critical illness, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one potential etiology that warrants consideration.

OBJECTIVE

This review will summarize the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of HIT, describe the diagnostic process, and review currently available treatment options.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE/PubMed search of all relevant primary and review articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a clinicopathologic syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia (>/=50% from baseline) that typically occurs between days 5 and 14 after initiation of heparin. This temporal profile suggests a possible diagnosis of HIT, which can be supported (or refuted) with a strong positive (or negative) laboratory test for HIT antibodies. When considering the diagnosis of HIT, critical care professionals should monitor platelet counts in patients who are at risk for HIT and carefully evaluate for, a) temporal features of the thrombocytopenia in relation to heparin exposure; b) severity of thrombocytopenia; c) clinical evidence for thrombosis; and d) alternative etiologies of thrombocytopenia. Due to its prothrombotic nature, early recognition of HIT and prompt substitution of heparin with a direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g., argatroban or lepirudin) or the heparinoid danaparoid (where available) reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, some of which may be life-threatening.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: When Heparin Causes Thrombosis: Significance, Recognition, and Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Dialysis Patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and paradoxical hypercoagulability. HIT occurs when an antibody ("HIT antibody") produced against the complex of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) causes systemic platelet consumption and activation. Nephrologists encounter HIT in the care of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients because heparin is a routine anticoagulant in hemodialysis. The incidence of HIT in ESRD appears to be lower than in other clinical settings. However, HIT is equally life threatening in ESRD patients and therefore demands the same prompt recognition and aggressive treatment. Diagnosing HIT requires the detection of HIT antibodies. A functional assay (e.g., [(14)C] serotonin release assay) relies on the patient's HIT antibodies to activate donor platelets at pharmacologic heparin concentrations. The more common antigen assay (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) detects the binding of the patient's HIT antibodies to antigens (e.g., heparin-PF4 complex) in a microtiter well and does not involve platelets. The moment HIT is suspected, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant initiated immediately, even before the result of a serologic test becomes available. The advent of several new anticoagulants in the last decade, especially argatroban and bivalirudin, has expanded treatment options for HIT in dialysis patients. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT, with special emphasis on concepts relevant to the care of dialysis patients.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated syndrome associated with heparin exposure, a falling platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. Cardiovascular patients are at increased risk of HIT due to wide use of heparin in this population. Should HIT be suspected, heparin must be avoided in most situations, and anticoagulation with an alternative anticoagulant should be instituted. Preferred agents include the direct thrombin inhibitors argatroban and lepirudin, whilst bivalirudin or desirudin (other direct thrombin inhibitors) can be used in some situations. The indirect thrombin inhibitors, danaparoid and fondaparinux, can also be considered at times. These agents and their use in cardiac patients, including patients with acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary interventions, acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery, will be reviewed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II: A rare but significant complication of plasma exchange

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but well-recognised and potentially life-threatening complication of unfractionated heparin therapy, and has been reported in association with heparin locks for central venous lines. We report a case of type II HIT complicated by iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in a 43-year-old woman in the course of plasma exchange for myasthenia gravis. A Gamcath central venous line had been inserted femorally due to poor peripheral venous access, and this was locked with heparin 5000 U/ml between procedures. Twelve days after initial heparin exposure, she presented with new-onset thrombocytopenia, a painfully swollen right leg, and pleuritic pain. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were confirmed radiologically, and serology for heparin/PF4 antibodies was unequivocally positive. The line was removed, and she was successfully managed with intravenous lepirudin, switching to warfarin on platelet recovery. This case demonstrates that Type II HIT can occur in association with heparin line locks in the course of plasmapheresis, despite previous reports of successful use of plasma exchange to treat Type II HIT.

The paradox of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: future anticoagulation

Heparin and low molecular weight heparin agents are frequently administered to postoperative orthopedic patients. In patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, alternative anticoagulant agents to heparin for prophylaxis and treatment must be considered. Unfortunately, the data is limited in this patient population. Upon transitioning from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors, argatroban, or lepirudin, careful consideration must be taken to avoid further thrombotic complications.