A one-year trial of triamcinolone acetonide aerosol in severe steroid-dependent asthma

Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the recommended mainstay of treatment in children and adults with persistent asthma. However, often, ICS are used intermittently by patients or recommended by physicians to be used only at the onset of exacerbations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of intermittent versus daily ICS in the management of children and adults with persistent asthma and preschool-aged children suspected of persistent asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR) and the ClinicalTrials.gov web site up to October 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intermittent ICS versus daily ICS in children and adults with persistent asthma. No co-interventions were permitted other than rescue relievers and oral corticosteroids used during exacerbations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, methodological quality and extracted data. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of patients with one or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids and the primary safety outcome was the number of patients with serious adverse health events. Secondary outcomes included exacerbations, lung function tests, asthma control, adverse effects, withdrawal rates and inflammatory markers. Equivalence was assumed if the risk ratio (RR) estimate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were between 0.9 and 1.1. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials (including one trial testing two relevant protocols) met the inclusion criteria for a total of seven group comparisons. The four paediatric trials (two involving preschool children and two school-aged children) and two adult parallel-group trials, lasting 12 to 52 weeks, were of high methodological quality. A total of 1211 patients with confirmed, or suspected, persistent asthma contributed to the meta-analyses. There was no statistically significant group difference in the risk of patients experiencing one or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (1204 patients; RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.32; the large confidence interval translates into a risk of exacerbations in the intermittent ICS group varying between 17% and 25%, assuming a 19% risk with daily ICS). Age, severity of airway obstruction, step-up protocol used during exacerbations and trial duration did not significantly influence the primary efficacy outcome. No group difference was observed in the risk of patients with serious adverse health events (1055 patients; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.33 to 2.03). Compared to the daily ICS group, the intermittent ICS group displayed a smaller improvement in change from baseline peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 2.56% (95% CI -4.49% to -0.63%), fewer symptom-free days (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.15 (95% CI -0.28 to -0.03), fewer asthma control days -9% (95% CI -14% to -4%), more use of rescue β2-agonists by 0.12 puffs/day (95% CI 0 to 0.23) and a greater increase from baseline in exhaled nitric oxide of 16.80 parts per billion (95% CI 11.95 to 21.64). There was no significant group difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), quality of life, airway hyper-reactivity, adverse effects, hospitalisations, emergency department visits or withdrawals. In paediatric trials, intermittent ICS (budesonide and beclomethasone) were associated with greater growth by 0.41 cm change from baseline (532 children; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.69) compared to daily treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In children and adults with persistent asthma and in preschool children suspected of persistent asthma, there was low quality evidence that intermittent and daily ICS strategies were similarly effective in the use of rescue oral corticosteroids and the rate of severe adverse health events. The strength of the evidence means that we cannot currently assume equivalence between the two options.. Daily ICS was superior to intermittent ICS in several indicators of lung function, airway inflammation, asthma control and reliever use. Both treatments appeared safe, but a modest growth suppression was associated with daily, compared to intermittent, inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone. Clinicians should carefully weigh the potential benefits and harm of each treatment option, taking into account the unknown long-term (> one year) impact of intermittent therapy on lung growth and lung function decline.

Intermittent versus daily inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the recommended mainstay of treatment in children and adults with persistent asthma. Yet often, ICS are used intermittently by patients or recommended by physicians to be used only at the onset of exacerbations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of intermittent versus daily ICS in the management of children and adults with persistent asthma and preschool-aged children suspected of persistent asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website up to December 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intermittent ICS versus daily ICS in children and adults with persistent asthma. No co-interventions were permitted other than rescue relievers and oral corticosteroids used during exacerbations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, methodological quality and extracted data. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of patients with one or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids and the primary safety outcome was the number of patients with serious adverse health events. Secondary outcomes included exacerbations, lung function tests, asthma control, adverse effects, withdrawal rates and inflammatory markers. Equivalence was assumed if the risk ratio (RR) estimate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were between 0.9 and 1.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials (including one trial testing two relevant protocols) met the inclusion criteria for a total of seven group comparisons. The four paediatric trials (two involving preschool children and two school-aged children) and two adult parallel-group trials, lasting 12 to 52 weeks, were of high methodological quality. A total of 1211 patients with confirmed, or suspected, persistent asthma contributed to the meta-analyses. There was no statistically significant group difference in the risk of patients experiencing one or more exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (1204 patients; RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.32). The patients' age, severity of airway obstruction, step-up protocol used during exacerbations and trial duration did not significantly influence the primary efficacy outcome. No group difference was observed in the risk of patients with serious adverse health events (1055 patients; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.33 to 2.03). Compared to the daily ICS group, the intermittent ICS group displayed a smaller improvement in change from baseline peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 2.56% (95% CI -4.49% to -0.63%), fewer symptom-free days (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.15 (95% CI -0.28 to -0.03), fewer asthma control days -9% (95% CI -14% to -4%), more use of rescue β(2)-agonists by 0.12 puffs/day (95% CI 0 to 0.23) and a greater increase from baseline in exhaled nitric oxide of 16.80 parts per billion (95% CI 11.95 to 21.64). There was no significant group difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), quality of life, airway hyper-reactivity, adverse effects, hospitalisations, emergency department visits or withdrawals. In paediatric trials, intermittent ICS (budesonide and beclomethasone) were associated with greater growth by 0.41 cm change from baseline (532 children; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.69) compared to daily treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In children and adults with persistent asthma and in preschool children suspected of persistent asthma, intermittent and daily ICS strategies did not significantly differ in the use of rescue oral corticosteroids and the rate of severe adverse health events, neither did they reach equivalence. Daily ICS was superior to intermittent ICS in several indicators of lung function, airway inflammation, asthma control and reliever use. Both treatments appeared safe, but a modest growth suppression was associated with daily, compared to intermittent, inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone. The clinician should carefully weigh the potential benefits and harm of each treatment option, taking into account the unknown long-term (> one year) impact of intermittent therapy on lung growth and lung function decline.

Inhaled Corticosteroids: Hazardous Effects on Voice—An Update

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have become the prevalent treatment in asthmatics. Hazards to voice are under-recognized. A total of 38 patients with voice complaints associated with the use of ICS were assessed by 79 strobovideolaryngoscopy (SVL) examinations, 24 single and 14 multiple SVL. Hoarseness and dysphonia were the primary reasons for referral. The ICS initially used most frequently was Advair Diskus (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol-inhalation powder-[IP]) in 22 patients, followed by Flovent (fluticasone propionate inhalation aerosol-pressurized metered-dose inhaler-[PMDI]) in 11. Duration of ICS usage varied from 2 weeks to 4-5 years. Higher dosage and frequency of use exacerbated problems. Hazards to voice previously unrecognized by real-time indirect mirror or fiberoptic laryngoscopy were identified by meticulous attention to SVL abnormalities. There was essentially no difference in occurrence of abnormalities whether analyzed from the perspective of the initial 38 or all 79 examinations. These included abnormal mucosal wave symmetry/periodicity (76-63%), phase closure (74-63%), glottic closure (63-59%), mucosal wave amplitude/magnitude (50-35%), supraglottic hyperactivity (39-25%), mucosal quality (34-34%), and glottic plane (10-5%). Candidiasis of the larynx was infrequently observed. Fluticasone ICS were a cause of steroid inhaler laryngitis, and the best treatment was their avoidance or cessation. Further prospective studies ideally might include SVL documented as a pretherapy baseline and then repeated in each ICS patient who developed hoarseness/dysphonia.

Subjective and objective evaluation of voice quality in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the voice quality in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma by subjective and objective methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative, controlled, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n=40) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n=40) were included. Acoustic analyses were performed by the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP; Kay Elemetrics Corporation, Lincoln Park, NJ) and the movements of the vocal cords were examined by videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS). In addition, the duration of illness, maximum phonation time, "s/z" values, and vital capacity were evaluated. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and GRB scales were used for subjective evaluations.

RESULTS

Maximum phonation time values were significantly shorter both in male and female asthma patients compared with controls (P<0.0001). Also, average shimmer values in MDVP were higher for both sexes in the patient group compared with controls (P=0.002 and P=0.04, respectively). There was a significant difference between female patients and sex-matched controls with regard to mean noise-to-harmonic ratio values (P=0.006). Female patients with asthma had higher average jitter values compared with sex-matched controls (P<0.0001). A significant difference was noted between asthma and control groups with regard to GRB scale (P<0.0001, P<0.001, and P<0.0001, respectively). The VHI score was above the normal limit in 16 (40%), and VLS findings were abnormal in 39 (97.5%) asthmatics.

CONCLUSION

In asthmatic patients, maximum phonation time, frequency, and amplitude perturbation parameters were impaired, but the vital capacity and the duration of illness did not correlate with these findings.

Voice problems as side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma patients--a prevalence study

Voice disturbances in asthma patients may be caused by inhaled corticosteroids. In order to study the prevalence of such voice disturbances, a questionnaire was delivered to asthma patients at three asthma and allergy departments in Stockholm. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions concerning the asthma disease symptoms, medication, voice function, and voice disturbances. A total of 350 questionnaires were delivered. Response frequency was 80%. There was a significant positive correlation between inhalation of cortison and voice disturbances. Most of the patients complained about hoarseness, followed by throat clearing, a lump in the throat, loss of voice, and less frequently, throat pain. There were no significantly differences between men and women. Elderly had more voice problems than young persons. Patients with voice-demanding professions had more problems than patients who used their voice to a lesser extent during the working day. There was a significant positive correlation between high cortison doses and voice problems as well as between voice problems and acid regurgitation.

The local side effects of inhaled corticosteroids: current understanding and review of the literature

The frequent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), especially at higher doses, has been accompanied by concern about both systemic and local side effects. The systemic complications of ICSs have been extensively studied and are well-documented in the literature. There are comparatively few studies reporting on the local complications of ICSs. Compared with systemic side effects, the local side effects of ICSs are considered to constitute infrequent and minor problems. However, while not usually serious, these local side effects are of clinical importance. They may hamper compliance with therapy and the symptoms produced may mimic more sinister pathology. This review considers the prevalence of local side effects, their clinical features, the potential causes, the role of inhaler devices, and current measures that have been suggested to avoid the problem.

Allergy and the contemporary laryngologist

The author believes that allergy plays an important role in the field of laryngology. Not every patient has significant allergic problems, but the allergic factor in laryngeal problems should not be underestimated. The insights and technology for research have never been better. Many cause-and-effect relationships have been suggested and often provide the working basis for current therapeutics. Many current models of operation need to be verified, explored further, and modified through research. It is hoped that new technologies will achieve a higher degree of sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. Better specificity is particularly needed in allergy testing and in testing thyroid and pulmonary function. The author hopes that the contemporary laryngologist/otolaryngologist will use this overview to formulate a complete and orderly approach to laryngeal problems. Because of the complexity of laryngeal problems, referral to other specialists may be necessary. The laryngologist, however, should be able to orchestrate the appropriate use of technologies and health care specialists to address these problems.

Dysphonia associated with inhaled steroids

The use of inhaled steroids in the treatment of asthma is not without its complications. In some studies up to 50% of such patients complain of oropharyngeal and voice problems. We present the findings in 22 patients complaining of dysphonia who underwent videostrobolaryngoscopy (VSL) and computerized speech analysis. A number of abnormalities were identified. On VSL, these included mucosal changes (noted in 58%), apposition abnormalities (noted in 43%), and supraglottic hyperfunction (noted in 40%). On speech analysis, cycle-to-cycle irregularity was frequently noted (mean of 39%). Maximum phonation time was reduced in 73%. Our findings did not confirm the widely held views that steroid dysphonia is due primarily to a fungal infection or a steroid-induced adductor myasthenia of the larynx. A larger-scale prospective study is indicated.

Dose-ranging study of the clinical efficacy of twice-daily triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol in moderately severe asthma

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the dose response to 6 weeks of triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol (TAA, 100 microg per puff) in patients with moderately severe asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 285 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 1, 2, 4, or 8 puffs TAA (total daily doses of 200, 400, 800, and 1,600 microg, respectively), administered twice daily, or matching placebos. Efficacy was assessed by changes in FEV1, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, and peak flow rates.

RESULTS

Linear trend analyses showed a dose response for all efficacy variables across the dose range of 200 to 1,600 microg daily. Therapeutic activity was evident at a dose of 200 microg daily for all variables, with significant clinical efficacy (p<0.05) demonstrated for all doses except for reduction in inhaled albuterol use which achieved statistical significance at 400 microg/d. Daily doses of 400 microg and higher showed response plateaus at 3 weeks of treatment that were maintained for the remainder of the trial. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups, although more patients treated with TAA reported pharyngitis in a dose-related manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that most patients with chronic, moderately severe asthma can be treated adequately with doses of TAA between 200 microg (1 puff bid) and 800 microg (4 puffs bid) daily. At this dose range, clinically significant improvements are evident in symptoms, pulmonary function, and rescue medication use.

Inhaled steroids and severe viral infections

In summary, the blanket inclusion of inhaled corticosteroids in the recent FDA label warning of an association between severe varicella infection and corticosteroid therapy without reference to dosage, and proof of immunosuppression and subsequent increased risk, dose not appear warranted. To date, no link has been established between inhaled steroids and pulmonary or systemic infections. Certainly, with the recent trend of use of higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids, a potential association is possible, but so far, this is only theoretical. Since inhaled corticosteroids have become the recommended drug of choice for many patients with asthma of varying disease severity, according to new recommendations from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (38), it is imperative that a sound basis of proof be provided to support this labeling change. It must be realized that this new warning may lead to adverse consequences resulting from the withholding by the patient or physician of a valuable mode of therapy for fear of adverse effects to the patient. Avoidance of inhaled steroid usage, in turn, could result in overuse of other medication that has more definite and frequent deleterious effects than the theoretical risks associated with inhaled steroids. Given the above information and arguments, a number of constructive recommendations about how to proceed at this time can be proposed.

Adrenal function in adult asthmatics during long-term daily treatment with 800, 1,200, and 1,600 micrograms triamcinolone acetonide. Multicenter study

A study to assess the effect of the long-term use of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on adrenal function was conducted with 143 male and female patients with asthma who were randomly assigned to receive 800, 1200, or 1,600 micrograms of TA daily for six months. Adrenal function was assessed prior to treatment and after two weeks and one, three, and six months of TA use. The effect of TA was evaluated by measuring plasma cortisol levels just prior to and 30 min after a bolus IV injection of 0.25 mg cosyntropin. Adrenal suppression was assumed if the plasma concentration of cortisol did not increase by at least 7 micrograms/dl from the prestimulation value, and remained below 18 micrograms/dl 30 min after the cosyntropin injection. Urine collected for 24 h prior to each cosyntropin stimulation was assayed for free cortisol and related metabolites to confirm suppression. Although all treatment regimens caused some reduction in the 24-h excretion of corticosteroid products, none of the mean values was below the normal ranges. The mean data indicate that TA had no significant effect on adrenal function at any dose or at any time for the patients overall. Individually, three patients exhibited some reduction in adrenal function.

Aerosol corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma

In an effort to maximize the efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in asthma and minimize the adverse reactions, steroid therapy has evolved to the inhalation route of administration with aerosol compounds having potent topical antiinflammatory activity and minimal systemic effects. Corticosteroids exhibiting these properties that are available in the U.S. include beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide. The success or failure of patient response to orally inhaled corticosteroids is often a function of adequate drug delivery rather than the efficacy of the drug itself. Patients who cannot use the inhaler accurately may benefit from the use of a spacer or reservoir device. The three aerosolized corticosteroids have specific pharmacologic differences; however, none of these differences has translated into a clinically significant advantage or disadvantage of one product over the others. These agents should be considered for adjunctive therapy in patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled by beta-agonist bronchodilators, theophylline, or cromolyn sodium.

Corticosteroid aerosols in the treatment of asthma

Since the 1950s, corticosteroid aerosols have proved useful in the treatment of asthma. Although their precise mechanism of action is not known, these topical agents have beneficial antiinflammatory and decongestive effects on the bronchial tree in both the allergic and nonallergic forms of this disease. Four of the newer aerosolized steroids--beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, flunisolide and budesonide--have been evaluated in clinical trials. The last drug is still investigational. Their side effects are minimal, the major ones being oral candidiasis and dysphonia. They are most effective when used prophylactically and should not be administered during acute asthmatic attacks, as insufficient amounts of drug are inhaled when the airways are obstructed. Patients must be instructed in the correct techniques of administering steroid aerosols to ensure optimal therapy.

Dysphonia caused by inhaled steroids: recognition of a characteristic laryngeal abnormality

Nine of 14 asthmatic patients who presented with persistent dysphonia while taking inhaled corticosteroids had a bilateral adductor vocal cord deformity with bowing of the cords on phonation. This causes the dysphonia and usually occurs without candidiasis. It was seen with beclomethasone dipropionate (in both pressurised aerosol and dry powder preparations), betamethasone valerate, and budesonide. It was related to the dose and potency of inhaled steroid and may represent a local steroid myopathy. It was reversed when the inhaled steroid was stopped, although resolution sometimes took weeks. Laryngeal candidiasis may have contributed to the vocal cord abnormality in two of these nine patients. Of the five patients without vocal cord deformity, laryngeal candidiasis was the sole cause of dysphonia in three. In the remaining two dysphonia was thought to be psychogenic. The vocal cord deformity may exist subclinically. Of nine patients who started to take aerosol steroid and who were examined monthly for one year, three developed vocal cord deformity but only one had persistent dysphonia. Vocal abuse did not appear to contribute to dysphonia.

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide aerosol in chronic asthma. Results of a multicenter, short-term controlled and long-term open study

Triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (TAA) and a placebo aerosol were compared in a six-week, double-blind multicenter study. Ninety-six steroid-independent asthmatic patients were randomized into two parallel groups. Each patient was evaluated weekly. After four weeks of treatment, those patients treated with TAA showed highly significant (P less than 0.001) improvement from baseline in pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, and FEF25-75%) and in asthmatic symptoms, whereas no significant improvement was observed in those patients who received placebo aerosol. In the TAA-treated patients, 78 percent were rated wtih an excellent or good response, compared with 24 percent in the placebo patients. During the subsequent one-week washout period, mean pulmonary function test values of the TAA-treated group were significantly reduced (P less than 0.0001). Eighty-eight patients continued into the one-year, open-label phase of the study. Highly significant (P less than 0.001) improvement from baseline was observed in pulmonary function tests and in asthmatic symptoms at each bimonthly evaluation during the 12-month segment. Mean plasma-cortisol level changes were not statistically significant. At the end of the long-term study, the performance of TAA was subjectively rated by the investigators (excellent or good in 92 percent of the patients) and by the patients (excellent or good in 89 percent). Mild-to-moderate adverse reactions (sore throat, hoarseness) were reported by six patients during the six-week phase and by ten patients during the 12-month phase. Thus, TAA was a safe and effective treatment in this series of bronchial asthma patients.