Efficacy of atropine methylnitrate alone and in combination with albuterol in children with asthma

Combined inhaled anticholinergics and short-acting beta2-agonists for initial treatment of acute asthma in children

BACKGROUND

There are several treatment options for managing acute asthma exacerbations (sustained worsening of symptoms that do not subside with regular treatment and require a change in management). Guidelines advocate the use of inhaled short acting beta2-agonists (SABAs) in children experiencing an asthma exacerbation. Anticholinergic agents, such as ipratropium bromide and atropine sulfate, have a slower onset of action and weaker bronchodilating effect, but may specifically relieve cholinergic bronchomotor tone and decrease mucosal edema and secretions. Therefore, the combination of inhaled anticholinergics with SABAs may yield enhanced and prolonged bronchodilation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the addition of inhaled anticholinergics to SABAs provides clinical improvement and affects the incidence of adverse effects in children with acute asthma exacerbations.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to April 2000), EMBASE (1980 to April 2000), CINAHL (1982 to April 2000) and reference lists of studies of previous versions of this review. We also contacted drug manufacturers and trialists. For the 2012 review update, we undertook an 'all years' search of the Cochrane Airways Group's register on the 18 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized parallel trials comparing the combination of inhaled anticholinergics and SABAs with SABAs alone in children (aged 18 months to 18 years) with an acute asthma exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used the GRADE rating system to assess the quality of evidence for our primary outcome (hospital admission).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty trials met the review eligibility criteria, generated 24 study comparisons and comprised 2697 randomised children aged one to 18 years, presenting predominantly with moderate or severe exacerbations. Most studies involved both preschool-aged children and school-aged children; three studies also included a small proportion of infants less than 18 months of age. Nine trials (45%) were at a low risk of bias. Most trials used a fixed-dose protocol of three doses of 250 mcg or two doses of 500 mcg of nebulized ipratropium bromide in combination with a SABA over 30 to 90 minutes while three trials used a single dose and two used a flexible-dose protocol according to the need for SABA.The addition of an anticholinergic to a SABA significantly reduced the risk of hospital admission (risk ratio (RR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.85; 15 studies, 2497 children, high-quality evidence). In the group receiving only SABAs, 23 out of 100 children with acute asthma were admitted to hospital compared with 17 (95% CI 15 to 20) out of 100 children treated with SABAs plus anticholinergics. This represents an overall number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 16 (95% CI 12 to 29).Trends towards a greater effect with increased treatment intensity and with increased asthma severity were observed, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no effect modification due to concomitant use of oral corticosteroids and the effect of age could not be explored. However, exclusion of the one trial that included infants (< 18 months) and contributed data to the main outcome, did not affect the results. Statistically significant group differences favoring anticholinergic use were observed for lung function, clinical score at 120 minutes, oxygen saturation at 60 minutes, and the need for repeat use of bronchodilators prior to discharge from the emergency department. No significant group difference was seen in relapse rates.Fewer children treated with anticholinergics plus SABA reported nausea and tremor compared with SABA alone; no significant group difference was observed for vomiting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Children with an asthma exacerbation experience a lower risk of admission to hospital if they are treated with the combination of inhaled SABAs plus anticholinergic versus SABA alone. They also experience a greater improvement in lung function and less risk of nausea and tremor. Within this group, the findings suggested, but did not prove, the possibility of an effect modification, where intensity of anticholinergic treatment and asthma severity, could be associated with greater benefit.Further research is required to identify the characteristics of children that may benefit from anticholinergic use (e.g. age and asthma severity including mild exacerbation and impending respiratory failure) and the treatment modalities (dose, intensity, and duration) associated with most benefit from anticholinergic use better.

Comparison of nebulized ipratropium bromide with salbutamol vs salbutamol alone in acute asthma exacerbation in children

BACKGROUND

Despite multiple doses of beta2-agonists in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation, significant residual airways obstruction often remains.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the addition of inhaled ipratropium bromide to salbutamol provides improvement in lung function and clinical asthma symptoms in young children with acute asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, double-blind randomized control trial of children aged 3 to 15 years who presented with an acute asthma exacerbation at the emergency department or outpatient clinic of Thammasat University Hospital, Pathumthani, Thailand, between September 2001 and February 2003. Subjects were randomized to receive 3 doses of nebulized salbutamol mixed with isotonic sodium chloride solution (control) or ipratropium bromide (treatment) every 20 minutes. Additional doses of salbutamol were given every 30 minutes as needed. Asthma outcome measures were evaluated 40, 70, 100, and 120 minutes after baseline. Primary outcomes were the differences in percent change in asthma clinical score and percent change in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included change in percent predicted PEFR.

RESULTS

Of 74 children randomized and enrolled in the trial, 71 had complete data for analysis. Thirty-three children were in the control group and 38 were in the treatment group. Both the percent change in PEFR and the change in percent predicted PEFR at any time were higher in the treatment group, but these findings were not statistically significantly different. The number of subjects with at least a 100% percent predicted PEFR at any time point was greater in the treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Although this study did not demonstrate a significant advantage in clinical score and PEFR, the trend toward additional effect of ipratropium bromide was consistent with previous studies.

Anticholinergic agents in asthma and COPD

Anticholinergic agents have important uses as bronchodilators for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases, both asthma and, more particularly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Those in approved clinical use are synthetic quaternary ammonium congeners of atropine, and include ipratropium bromide, oxitropium bromide, and tiotropium bromide, each of which is very poorly absorbed when given by inhalation. Ipratropium and oxitropium have relatively short durations of action (4-8 h). They have been widely used for many years, either alone or in combination with short-acting beta-adrenergic agents such as albuterol and fenoterol, for both maintenance treatment of stable disease and for acute exacerbations of airway obstruction. Tiotropium, which was introduced in the early 2000s, has a duration of action of at least 1-2 days making it suitable for once-daily maintenance treatment of COPD. All of the above agents have a wide therapeutic margin and are safe and well tolerated by patients.

Anticholinergic therapy for chronic asthma in children over two years of age

BACKGROUND

In the intrinsic system of controlling airway calibre, the cholinergic (muscarinic) sympathetic nervous system has an important role. Anticholinergic, anti muscarinic bronchodilators such as ipratropium bromide are frequently used in the management of childhood airway disease. In asthma, ipratropium is a less potent bronchodilator than beta-2 adrenergic agents but it is known to be a useful adjunct to other therapies, particularly in status asthmaticus. What remains unclear is the role of anticholinergic drugs in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs in chronic asthma in children over the age of 2 years.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles were searched in January 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which anticholinergic drugs were given for chronic asthma in children over 2 years of age were included. Studies including comparison of: anticholinergics with placebo, and anticholinergics with any other drug were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligibility for inclusion and quality of trials were assessed independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.Three papers compared the effects of anticholinergic drugs with placebo, and a meta-analysis of these results demonstrated no statistically significant benefit of the use of anticholinergic drugs over placebo in any of the outcome measures used. The results of one of these trials could not be included in the meta-analysis but the authors did report significantly lower symptom scores with inhaled anticholinergics compared with placebo. However, there was no significant difference between ipratropium bromide and placebo in the percentage of symptom-free nights or days. Two trials studied the effects of anticholinergics on bronchial hyper responsiveness to histamine, by measuring the provocation dose of histamine needed to cause a fall of 20 % in FEV1 (PD 20). One study (comparing anticholinergics with placebo) reported a statistically significant increase in PD 20 but this was not found in another study (comparing anticholinergics with a beta-2 agonist). Both trials also examined the effect of anticholinergic drugs on diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and reported no significant effect. Two studies compared the addition of an anticholinergic drug to a beta-2 agonist with the beta-2 agonist alone. Both trials failed to show any significant benefit from the long term use of combined anticholinergics with beta-2 agonists compared with beta-2 agonists alone. One trial compared the effects of oral and inhaled anticholinergic drugs with placebo. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the outcome measures except for a higher FEV1 / VC ratio and RV / TLC ratio with oral anticholinergic therapy when compared with placebo.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The present review summarises the best evidence available to date. Although there were some small beneficial findings in favour of anticholinergic therapy, there is insufficient data to support the use of anticholinergic drugs in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma in children.

Combined inhaled anticholinergic agents and beta-2-agonists for initial treatment of acute asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Anti-cholinergic agents and beta2-agonist drugs are both bronchodilators used to reverse acute bronchospasm in children with asthma. These drugs have different modes of action, so may have complementary or additive effects.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of adding inhaled anti-cholinergics to beta2-agonists in acute paediatric asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline (1966 to 1996), Embase (1980 to 1995), Cinahl (1982 to 1995) and reference lists of studies. We also contacted drug manufacturers and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing the combination of inhaled anti-cholinergics and beta2-agonists with beta2-agonists alone in children aged 18 months to 17 years with acute asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessments of trial quality and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials involving a total of 836 children were included. Most trials were of high quality. When only one dose of anti-cholinergic inhalation was added to beta2-agonist therapy, there was an improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second after 60 minutes with combination therapy (weighted mean difference 16.1%, 95% confidence interval 5.5 to 26. 7% reduction). There was no reduction in hospital admission (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.82, using a random effects model). For multiple doses in children with severe asthma, there was a reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (weighted mean difference 9.8% predicted, 95% confidence interval 6. 5 to 13.1% predicted). There may also be a reduction in hospital admission (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.99). Eleven children would need to be given multiple doses of anti-cholinergics in combination with beta2-agonists to avoid one hospital admission compared to children given beta2-agonists alone.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In children with acute asthma, the addition of multiple doses of anti-cholinergics to inhaled beta2-agonists appears to improve lung function modestly and may decrease hospital admission. There is no associated increase in adverse effects. Single doses of anti-cholinergics may improve lung function in children with severe asthma, but do not appear to reduce hospital admissions.

Efficacy of atropine sulfate in combination with albuterol in the treatment for acute asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of combination therapy using atropine sulfate and albuterol in the treatment for an acute exacerbation of asthma.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in the ED of a large, inner-city, university-affiliated teaching hospital. Participants were a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED between September 1993 and March 1994 with acute exacerbations of their asthma. Patients judged to be in extremis were excluded. All patients received 3 nebulized treatments with 2.5 mg of albuterol at 0, 30, and 60 minutes. Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 groups with the following added to their nebulizer solutions: 1) saline placebo during all 3 treatments; 2) 2.0 mg atropine sulfate added to the first nebulizer and saline in the second and third; or 3) 2.0 mg atropine to the first and third treatments (with saline in the second). No other medication was administered during the study period. At 90 minutes, the patients were evaluated for admission or release from the ED according to predetermined criteria, and additional medications were given as necessary. Vital signs, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), degree of wheezing, level of distress, and side effects were measured before and after each nebulizer treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 153 patients eligible for the study, 126 completed the entire study protocol. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups on any parameter studied, including improvement of PEFR, vital signs, or level of distress. There was no difference in the admission rate between the 3 groups, nor was there a difference in the incidence of side effects among the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study population, combination therapy with atropine sulfate and albuterol offered no significant benefit over the use of albuterol alone in the treatment for acute exacerbation of asthma.

Treatment of critical status asthmaticus in children

Status asthmaticus is complex in its etiology and pathophysiology and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although there are many therapeutic options, specific inhaled beta 2-agonists, corticosteroids, and oxygen remain the mainstay of therapy. Several new drugs and some older drugs are being used in management; their exact role in treatment at present, however, relies largely on personal preferences. Innovative methods of providing ventilatory support are also emerging. What is quite clear is the fact that involvement of specialists (pulmonologists and intensivists) early in the course of severe status asthmaticus is needed to ensure optimal management and possibly favorable outcomes.

Management of chronic asthma

The treatment of asthma is changing to reflect the importance of inflammation in the disease pathogenesis. Medicines that alter the inflammatory response are the cornerstone of therapy for patients with persistent symptoms. Bronchodilators are important in acute care, but in chronic illness they are adjuvant therapy. Patient education is essential for successful outcome.

Asthma pathogenesis and the implications for therapy in children

Gaining greater insight into the pathogenesis of asthma has redefined the approach to treatment of children with asthma. Clearly, the Expert Panel of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Education Program has played a major role in taking the message to a wide audience of health care providers. Although only early trends are evident at this point in time, within several years therapeutic trends underway currently will be more commonplace, and we may observe how asthma continues to impact society and our health care system. The approach to therapy will continue to evolve and most likely be controversial for years to come.

Anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of allergic disease

The treatment of asthma is undergoing significant change with an emphasis on anti-inflammatory therapy. While glucocorticoids are the most potent anti-inflammatory agent, certain patients fail to respond. These patients may be candidates for alternative anti-inflammatory therapy, such as troleandomycin, methotrexate, gold, hydroxychloroquine, or dapsone. In addition, the application of immunomodulator therapy, such as intravenous gamma globulin or cyclosporine, may be useful.

Alternative treatments for asthma: assessing the need

Alternative treatments such as troleandomycin methotrexate, gold, and intravenous gamma globulin are sometimes considered for severe asthmatics to minimize the need for systemic corticosteroids and reduce adverse effects. These alternative therapies may also be associated with significant toxicity and expense. The ability to reduce corticosteroid use and the need for alternative treatment interventions in 125 pediatric patients at our institution were reviewed. Because corticosteroid requirements were reduced significantly, only 23 of 125 children evaluated were considered for treatment alternatives with only 10 receiving such therapy. This study emphasizes the importance of a thorough and comprehensive review of corticosteroid requirements and usage prior to initiating alternative approaches to treatment in moderate to severe asthmatics as well as in patients thought to be "steroid-dependent."

Brief report: therapeutic manipulations in severe nocturnal asthma. A nonconventional approach in a severe high-risk asthmatic

A patient with severe nocturnal asthma of multifactorial pathogenesis with high-risk features leading to several episodes of nocturnal respiratory arrests is described. Despite aggressive conventional therapy with bronchodilators and glucocorticoid agents, the patient had progressive worsening within the year prior to admission. After a nonconventional approach consisting of: high-dose inhaled steroids, afternoon dose of prednisone, addition of troleandomycin therapy, high-dose inhaled ipratropium at bedtime, maximizing serum theophylline concentrations in the early morning, and nasal CPAP through the night; the patient's pulmonary functions were optimized with minimal or no reduction in morning FEV1, and decreased airways hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.