Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease is Associated with Greater Impairment of Lung Function than Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Multiple genetic polymorphisms are associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome, fatty liver, and airflow limitation: A Taiwan Biobank study

BACKGROUND

Links have been reported between the airflow limitation and both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and fatty liver (FL). Additionally, associations between genetic factors and risks of MetS, FL, and airflow limitation have been identified separately in different studies. Our study aims to simultaneously explore the association between specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of certain genes and the risk of the three associated diseases.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional nationwide study, 150,709 participants from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) were enrolled. We conducted a genotype-phenotype association analysis of nine SNPs on seven genes (ApoE-rs429358, MBOAT7-rs641738, LEPR-rs1805096, APOC3-rs2854116, APOC3-rs2854117, PPP1R3B-rs4240624, PPP1R3B-rs4841132, TM6SF2-rs58542926, and IFNL4-rs368234815) using data from the TWB1.0 and TWB2.0 genotype dataset. Participants underwent a series of assessments including questionnaires, blood examinations, abdominal ultrasounds, and spirometry examinations.

RESULTS

MetS was associated with FL and airflow limitation. ApoE-rs429358, LEPR-rs1805096, APOC3-rs2854116, APOC3-rs2854117, PPP1R3B-rs4240624, PPP1R3B-rs4841132, and TM6SF2-rs58542926 were significantly associated with the risk of MetS. The cumulative impact of T alleles of ApoE-rs429358 and TM6SF2-rs58542926 on the risk of FL was observed (p-value for trend < 0.001). Individuals without MetS and airflow limitation carrying LEPR-rs1805096 G_G genotype exhibited a reduction in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage prediction (Coefficient -35, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -69.7- -0.4), low forced vital capacity percentage prediction (Coefficient -41.6, 95 % CI -82.6- -0.6), and low vital capacity percentage prediction (Coefficient -42.2, 95 % CI -84.2- -0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

MetS significantly correlated with FL and airflow limitation. Multiple SNPs were notably associated with MetS. Specifically, T alleles of ApoE-rs429358 and TM6SF2-rs58542926 cumulatively increased the risk of FL. LEPR-rs1805096 shows a trend-wise association with pulmonary function, which is significant in patients without MetS or airflow limitation.

Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio combined with decreased lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is associated with increased peripheral airway resistance in patients with hepatic steatosis

Although the link between hepatic steatosis and lung function has been confirmed, the focus has largely been on central airways. The association between hepatic steatosis and increased peripheral airway resistance has not yet been explored. Hepatic steatosis and increased peripheral resistance are connected with immunity dysregulation. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been recognized as indicators of immunity dysregulation. In this study, the association between hepatic steatosis and increased peripheral airway resistance was evaluated, and the effect of immunity dysregulation (high NLR/low LMR) on the increased peripheral airway resistance among patients with hepatic steatosis was explored. In this retrospective study, chest or abdomen CT scans and spirometry/impulse oscillometry (IOS) from 2018 to 2019 were used to identify hepatic steatosis and increased central/peripheral airway resistance in patients. Among 1391 enrolled patients, 169 (12.1%) had hepatic steatosis. After 1:1 age and abnormal ALT matching was conducted, clinical data were compared between patients with and without hepatic steatosis. A higher proportion of patients with hepatic steatosis had increased peripheral airway resistance than those without hepatic steatosis (52.7% vs 40.2%, P = .025). Old age, high body mass index, history of diabetes, and high NLR/low LMR were significantly correlated with increased peripheral airway resistance. The presence of hepatic steatosis is associated with increased peripheral airway. High NLR/low LMR is an independent associated factor of increased peripheral airway resistance in patients with hepatic steatosis. It is advisable for patients with hepatic steatosis to regularly monitor their complete blood count/differential count and undergo pulmonary function tests including IOS.

Association of hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults

With high prevalence and substantial mortality, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are significant public health concerns. Utilizing a large, population-based dataset from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, our study probes the relationship between COPD prevalence and hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, as measured by Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography. We analyzed data from 693 individuals with COPD and 7229 without. Through weighted multivariate logistic regression analysis, a restricted cubic spline curve, and threshold effect analysis, we investigated the correlation between the severity of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and the presence of COPD. Our findings revealed a positive correlation between the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and COPD prevalence [OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.01, 1.05)], even after multivariate adjustment. Furthermore, we observed a U-shaped association between CAP and COPD, where the inflection point, CAP value of 264.85 dB/m, corresponded to the lowest COPD prevalence. Our study emphasizes a substantial and complex link between hepatic steatosis and COPD. These findings urge healthcare professionals to factor liver health into COPD management and prompt further exploration into the underlying mechanisms. This could pave the way for the development of improved prevention and treatment strategies.

MAFLD as part of systemic metabolic dysregulation

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases worldwide. In recent years, a new terminology and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. Compared to the NAFLD definition, MAFLD better emphasizes the pathogenic role of metabolic dysfunction in the development and progression of this highly prevalent condition. Metabolic disorders, including overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertension, are often associated with systemic organ dysfunctions, thereby suggesting that multiple organ damage can occur in MAFLD. Substantial epidemiological evidence indicates that MAFLD is not only associated with an increased risk of liver-related complications, but also increases the risk of developing several extra-hepatic diseases, including new-onset T2DM, adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes, and some common endocrine diseases. We have summarized the current literature on the adverse effect of MAFLD on the development of multiple extrahepatic (cardiometabolic and endocrine) complications and examined the role of different metabolic pathways and organ systems in the progression of MAFLD, thus providing new insights into the role of MAFLD as a multisystem metabolic disorder. Our narrative review aimed to provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying the known associations between MAFLD and extrahepatic diseases, as part of MAFLD as a multisystem disease, in order to help focus areas for future drug development targeting not only liver disease but also the risk of extrahepatic complications.

Comparative associations of MASLD and MAFLD with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcification

We aimed to compare the associations of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with coronary artery calcification (CAC). Patients who simultaneously underwent ultrasonography to diagnose hepatic steatosis and cardiac computed tomography to detect CAC were included. The presence and severity of CAC were defined with CAC-score thresholds of >0 and > 300, respectively, and patients were divided into the following groups: no MASLD or MAFLD (reference), MASLD-only, MAFLD-only, and overlapping groups. Overall, 1,060/2,773 (38.2%) patients had CAC, of which 196 (18.5%) had severe CAC. The MASLD and MAFLD prevalence rates were 32.6% and 45.2%, respectively, with an overlap of 30.7%. In an ASCVD risk score-adjusted model, both MASLD (adjusted odd ratios [aOR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.44; p = 0.033) and MAFLD (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.42, p = 0.034) were associated with CAC, whereas only MASLD (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89, p = 0.041) was associated with severe CAC. Compared to the reference group, the overlapping group showed an association with CAC (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.47; p = 0.038); however, the MASLD and MAFLD subgroups did not differ in their association with CAC. MASLD may predict a higher risk of ASCVD more effectively than MAFLD.

Exposure to ambient air pollution and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: Findings from over 2.7 million adults in Northwestern China

Ambient air pollutants exposures may lead to aggravated Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD). However, there is still a scarcity of empirical studies that have rigorously estimated this association, especially in regions where air pollution is severe. To fill in the literature gap, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving 2711,207 adults living in five regions of southern Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in 2021. Using a Space-Time Extra-Trees model, we assessed the four-year (2017-2020) average concentrations of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤1 µm (PM1), particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5), particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤10 µm (PM10), ozone (O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and carbon monoxide (CO), and then assigned these values to the participants. Generalized linear mixed models were employed to examine the relationships between air pollutants and the prevalence of MAFLD, with adjustment for multiple confounding factors. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of MAFLD were 2.002 (1.826-2.195), 1.133 (1.108-1.157), 1.034 (1.027-1.040), 1.077 (1.023-1.134), 2.703 (2.322-3.146) and 1.033 (1.029-1.036) per 10 µg/m3 increase in the 4-year average PM1, PM2.5, PM10, O3, SO2 and CO exposures, respectively. The robustness of the findings was confirmed by a series of sensitivities. In summary, long-term exposure to ambient air pollutants was associated with increased odds of MAFLD, particularly in males and individuals with unhealthy lifestyles.

Current understanding and future perspectives on the impact of changing NAFLD to MAFLD on global epidemiology and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

For the first time in nearly half a century, fatty liver disease has undergone a change in name and definition, from the exclusive term, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), to the inclusion-based, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This has led investigators across the globe to evaluate the impact the nomenclature change has had on the epidemiology and natural history of the disease.

METHODS

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview on how the shift in name and diagnostic criteria has influenced point prevalence in different geographic regions, as well as morbidity and mortality risk, whilst highlighting gaps in the literature that need to be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD prevalence is higher than NAFLD prevalence, carries a higher risk of overall mortality, with greater granularity in risk-stratification amongst MAFLD subtypes.

AutoFibroNet: A deep learning and multi-photon microscopy-derived automated network for liver fibrosis quantification in MAFLD

BACKGROUND

Liver fibrosis is the strongest histological risk factor for liver-related complications and mortality in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) is a powerful tool for label-free two-dimensional and three-dimensional tissue visualisation that shows promise in liver fibrosis assessment.

AIM

To investigate combining multi-photon microscopy (MPM) and deep learning techniques to develop and validate a new automated quantitative histological classification tool, named AutoFibroNet (Automated Liver Fibrosis Grading Network), for accurately staging liver fibrosis in MAFLD.

METHODS

AutoFibroNet was developed in a training cohort that consisted of 203 Chinese adults with biopsy-confirmed MAFLD. Three deep learning models (VGG16, ResNet34, and MobileNet V3) were used to train pre-processed images and test data sets. Multi-layer perceptrons were used to fuse data (deep learning features, clinical features, and manual features) to build a joint model. This model was then validated in two further independent cohorts.

RESULTS

AutoFibroNet showed good discrimination in the training set. For F0, F1, F2 and F3-4 fibrosis stages, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of AutoFibroNet were 1.00, 0.99, 0.98 and 0.98. The AUROCs of F0, F1, F2 and F3-4 fibrosis stages for AutoFibroNet in the two validation cohorts were 0.99, 0.83, 0.80 and 0.90 and 1.00, 0.83, 0.80 and 0.94, respectively, showing a good discriminatory ability in different cohorts.

CONCLUSION

AutoFibroNet is an automated quantitative tool that accurately identifies histological stages of liver fibrosis in Chinese individuals with MAFLD.

Lean Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Since the nomenclature change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), much work has been undertaken to establish the clinical characteristics as well as the hepatic and extrahepatic complications of the different MAFLD subtypes. Currently, there has been significant work performed to evaluate previously acknowledged evidence in the lean NAFLD population to determine its applicability to the new entity. This article examines recently published data on lean MAFLD cohorts to highlight the prevalence, pathophysiological characteristics, associated liver fibrosis, genetics, hepatic and extrahepatic complications, prognosis, treatment, and research into this unique subtype of MAFLD.

Comparative Associations of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease With Coronary Artery Calcification: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In cross-sectional and retrospective cohort studies, we examined comparative associations between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and risk of having or developing coronary artery calcification (CAC).

METHODS

Participants who had health examinations between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Liver ultrasonography and coronary artery computed tomography were used to diagnose fatty liver and CAC. Participants were divided into a MAFLD and no-MAFLD group and then NAFLD and no-NAFLD groups. Participants were further divided into no fatty liver disease (reference), NAFLD-only, MAFLD-only, and both NAFLD and MAFLD groups. Logistic regression modeling was performed. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the risk of incident CAC in participants without CAC at baseline and who had at least two CAC measurements.

RESULTS

In cross-sectional analyses, 162 180 participants were included. Compared with either the no-NAFLD or no-MAFLD groups, the NAFLD and MAFLD groups were associated with a higher risk of prevalent CAC (NAFLD: adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.34 [95% CI, 1.29-1.39]; MAFLD: adjusted OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.39-1.48]). Among the 4 groups, the MAFLD-only group had the strongest association with risk of prevalent CAC (adjusted OR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.52-1.69]). Conversely, the NAFLD-only group was associated with a lower risk of prevalent CAC (adjusted OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.87]). In longitudinal analyses, 34 233 participants were included. Compared with either the no-NAFLD or no-MAFLD groups, the NAFLD and MAFLD groups were associated with a higher risk of incident CAC (NAFLD: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.99]; MAFLD: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.56-2.13]). Among these 4 groups, the MAFLD-only group had the strongest associations with risk of incident CAC (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.03,[95% CI, 1.62-2.55]). The NAFLD-only group was not independently associated with risk of incident CAC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.44-1.78]) Conclusions: Both NAFLD and MAFLD are significantly associated with an increased prevalence and incidence of CAC. These associations tended to be stronger for MAFLD.

The Inter-Organ Crosstalk Reveals an Inevitable Link between MAFLD and Extrahepatic Diseases

Fatty liver is known to be associated with extra-hepatic diseases including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and extra-hepatic cancers, which affect the prognosis and quality of life of the patients. The inter-organ crosstalk is mediated by metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance and visceral adiposity. Recently, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a new definition for fatty liver. MAFLD is characterized by the inclusion criteria of metabolic abnormality. Therefore, MAFLD is expected to identify patients at high risk of extra-hepatic complications. In this review, we focus on the relationships between MAFLD and multi-organ diseases. We also describe the pathogenic mechanisms of the inter-organ crosstalk.

MAFLD: How is it different from NAFLD?

"Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)" is the term suggested in 2020 to refer to fatty liver disease related to systemic metabolic dysregulation. The name change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to MAFLD comes with a simple set of criteria to enable easy diagnosis at the bedside for the general medical community, including primary care physicians. Since the introduction of the term, there have been key areas in which the superiority of MAFLD over the traditional NAFLD terminology has been demonstrated, including for the risk of liver and extrahepatic mortality, disease associations, and for identifying high-risk individuals. Additionally, MAFLD has been adopted by a number of leading pan-national and national societies due to its concise diagnostic criterion, removal of the requirement to exclude concomitant liver diseases, and reduction in the stigma associated with this condition. The current article explores the differences between MAFLD and NAFLD diagnosis, areas of benefit, some potential limitations, and how the MAFLD terminology has opened up new fields of research.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in metabolic-associated fatty liver disease vs. type 2 diabetes mellitus non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is comorbidity commonly presenting with fatty liver. A recently proposed definition of "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) is thought to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Yet, despite the significant prevalence of T2DM among fatty liver, there remains limited evidence on the impact of the change in the definition of T2DM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study uses data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. Survival analysis was conducted with a cox regression and sub-distribution hazard ratio for competing risk events.

RESULTS

6727 patients had a diagnosis of T2DM. 4982 individuals with T2DM had MAFLD and 2032 were MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-), while 2950 patients were MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+). The new definition increased fatty liver diagnosis by 68.89%. Patients who were classified as MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-) were at a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, advanced fibrosis, all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality compared to MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+). In MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-), viral hepatitis significantly increases the odds of advanced fibrosis (OR: 6.77, CI: 3.92 to 11.7, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.75, CI: 1.29 to 2.40, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The identification and treatment of NAFLD in patients with T2DM is a major concern and the premature change to MAFLD results in an over-diagnosis of fatty liver, exaggerated mortality, and morbidity in patients with T2DM. The definition of MAFLD causes further heterogeneity in fatty liver disease/NAFLD.

Old and new classes of glucose-lowering agents as treatments for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A narrative review

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease with a global prevalence of about 55% in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM, obesity and NAFLD are three closely inter-related pathological conditions. In addition, T2DM is one of the strongest clinical risk factors for the faster progression of NAFLD to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Increasing evidence suggests that newer classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, could reduce the rates of NAFLD progression. This narrative review aims to briefly summarize the recent results from randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy and safety of old and new glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of NAFLD or NASH in adults both with and without coexisting T2DM.

Epidemiology, natural history, and diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a comparative review with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide - with an estimated global prevalence of 37%. Different from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is an exclusion diagnosis, MAFLD is defined by a set of positive criteria. This recent change in terminology is challenging because MAFLD and NAFLD denote two similar, albeit not identical, clinical populations. When the diagnostic criteria for MAFLD are applied, liver histology appears more severe and clinical outcomes are less favorable. However, the clinical management of MAFLD and NAFLD remains similar. While liver biopsy is still the reference standard for achieving a final diagnosis, noninvasive imaging- or biomarker-based diagnostic modalities are currently gaining momentum. However, liver biopsy should be recommended when diagnostic challenges exist. In this review, we compared the epidemiology, natural history, and diagnosis of MAFLD with respect to the traditional NAFLD definition.