Prehabilitation-Driven Changes in Frailty Metrics Predict Mortality in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease

Clinically relevant cut-points for changes in the Liver Frailty Index are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis

Physical frailty is a critical determinant of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and can be objectively measured using the Liver Frailty Index (LFI), which is potentially modifiable. We aimed to identify LFI cut-points associated with waitlist mortality. Ambulatory adults with cirrhosis without HCC awaiting liver transplantation from 9 centers from 2012 to 2021 for ≥3 months with ≥2 pre-liver transplantation LFI assessments were included. The primary explanatory variable was the change in LFI from first to second assessments per 3 months (∆LFI); we evaluated clinically relevant ∆LFI cut-points at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5. The primary outcome was waitlist mortality (death or delisting for being too sick), with transplant considered as a competing event. Among 1029 patients, the median (IQR) age was 58 (51-63) years; 42% were female; and the median lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium at first assessment was 18 (15-22). For each 0.1 improvement in ∆LFI, the risk of overall mortality decreased by 6% (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001). ∆LFI was associated with waitlist mortality at cut-points as low as 0.1 (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87) and 0.2 (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). An improvement in LFI per 3 months as small as 0.1 in the pre-liver transplantation period is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in waitlist mortality. These data provide estimates of the reduction in mortality risk associated with improvements in LFI that can be used to assess the effectiveness of interventions targeting physical frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

The use of digital health interventions to deliver prehabilitation in solid organ transplant recipients: are we there yet?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prehabilitation, defined as preparing the body physically and psychologically for upcoming surgery is of increasing prominence in presurgical care. The aim of this review is to discuss the evidence base around prehabilitation in solid organ transplantation, the use of digital health as a tool to deliver these interventions, and consider future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prehabilitation is of increasing interest as an adjunct to pretransplant care for individuals working up for solid organ transplantation. To date, research has shown that prehabilitation is acceptable and feasible; however, the literature base remains small. The majority of research has been delivered using in-person rehabilitation programmes, and the evidence base utilizing digital health as a means to deliver prehabilitation is limited.

SUMMARY

To date, the research evidence base in prehabilitation for solid organ transplantation is limited. Evidence in other surgical populations has demonstrated promising results, particularly in aerobic capacity, physical function and postoperative complications. Further high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials are required to strengthen the evidence base, understand how digital health can be harnessed and utilized to deliver multimodal prehabilitation with an aim to see how this may form part of routine care in the solid organ transplantation pathway.

Association of Frailty With Clinical and Financial Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Frailty, a measure of physiological aging and reserve, has been validated as a prognostic indicator of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. However, large-scale analyses of the independent association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) are lacking.

METHODS

Adults (≥18 years) undergoing LT were identified in the 2016-2020 National Readmissions Database. Frailty was defined using the binary Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the independent association of frailty with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and costs.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 34 442 patients undergoing LT, 8265 (24%) were frail. After adjustment, frailty was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.80; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.49-1.18), postoperative length of stay (β + 11 days; 95% CI: +10, +12), and hospitalization costs (+$86 880; 95% CI: +75 660, +98 100), as well as a two-fold increase in relative risk of nonhome discharge (AOR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.90-2.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, complications, and resource utilization among LT recipients. As the proportion of frail LT patients continues to rise, our findings underscore the need for novel risk-stratification and individualized care protocols for such vulnerable patients.

Frailty in liver transplantation: Exploring prescribing exercise as medicine to improve patient outcomes

Liver transplantation (LT) represents a curative avenue for individuals with advanced chronic liver disease. Given the inherent illness severity of LT candidates, identifying patients at greater risk for adverse outcomes before and after transplantation is paramount. Approximately 50% of cirrhotic patients are frail and have considerable functional impairment. Various measures have been used to assess frailty, including performance-based tests and functional status evaluations. Frailty carries significant prognostic implications and predicts both mortality and pre- and post-LT complications. Contributing factors to frailty in this population include sarcopenia, malnutrition, inflammation, and psychosocial factors. Recognizing the prevalence of frailty among LT candidates, exercise interventions have been developed to improve physical frailty and offer potential to improve patient outcomes. While many interventions have demonstrated efficacy without notable adverse events, the absence of a universally accepted standard for exercise prescription underscores the variability in intervention elements and patient adherence. Given the safety profile of exercise interventions, there remains a critical need for standardized protocols and guidelines to optimize exercise regimens for LT candidates. This review delves into the landscape of frailty among LT candidates, elucidating its etiological underpinnings, impact on outcomes, utilization of exercise interventions, and the efficacy of exercise programs in reducing the burden frailty in those awaiting LT.

The Liver Frailty Index: a model for establishing organ-specific frailty metrics across all solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss the development of the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) and how it may serve as a model for developing other organ-specific frailty indices.

RECENT FINDINGS

As the demand for solid organ transplants continues to increase, the transplantation community is enhancing its strategies for organ allocation to gain deeper insights into patient risk profiles and anticipated outcomes. Frailty has emerged as a critical concept in transplant care, offering valuable insights into adverse health outcomes. Standardizing frailty assessment across transplant programs could enhance prognostic accuracy and inform pretransplant interventions.The LFI comprises of three performance-based tests that each represents essential components of the multidimensional frailty construct. This composite metric provides insights beyond liver function and considers nonhepatic comorbid factors. Identifying common frailty principles among all transplant candidates and adopting the LFI methodology, which assesses fundamental frailty principles using liver-specific tools, could establish a foundational pool of shared core frailty principles. From this pool, organ-specific frailty indices could be derived, each equipped with the clinically relevant organ-specific tools to evaluate common core principles.

SUMMARY

Creating a standardized framework across all solid-organ transplants, with common principles and organ-specific measurements, would facilitate consistent frailty assessment, standardize the integration of the frailty construct into transplant decision-making, and enable center-level interventions to improve outcomes for patients with end-stage organ disease.

Comparing Functional Frailty and Radiographic Sarcopenia as Predictors of Outcomes After Liver Transplant

INTRODUCTION

Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. The ability to identify frail patients at risk of adverse outcomes could help optimize liver transplant (LT) evaluations and pre-transplant care. This study compared sarcopenia, via L3-psoas muscle index (L3-PMI), to frailty, via liver frailty index (LFI) and analyzed associated outcomes after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive LT-recipients with cross-sectional abdominal/pelvic imaging were reviewed over 5 years at a single transplant center.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-six patients underwent transplant during this study interval; 31% of patients were sarcopenic. Two hundred eight patients underwent LFI evaluation: 25% were frail, 59% were prefrail, and 16% were robust. Sarcopenic patients had higher LFI scores indicating greater frailty (p = 0.02). Both sarcopenia and LFI-frailty were associated with significantly higher MELD-Na scores. Length of post-LT hospital stay was increased in sarcopenic (mean 14 vs. nonsarcopenic 11 days, p = 0.02) and LFI-frail patients (mean 13 vs. 10 prefrail, 8 robust, p = 0.04). As a categorical variable, neither LFI-frailty nor sarcopenia were significantly associated with reduced survival at 1-year (robust 100%, prefrail 93.5%, frail 91.1%, p = 0.31) (nonsarcopenic 94.4%, sarcopenic 91.4%, p = 0.30). However, LFI score was significantly associated with mortality at 1-year (OR 2.133, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic sarcopenia is a suitable proxy for in-person frailty assessment as both L3-PMI and LFI capture frail patients' pre-LT. However, physical assessment with frailty better predicts 1-year mortality post-LT than the measurement of muscle mass.

Frailty and transplant-free survival of patients with liver cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a common condition among patients with liver cirrhosis. Nonetheless, its role in predicting liver transplant-free survival (TFS) remains unclear.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to elucidate the relationship between frailty and TFS in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Cohort studies addressing the objective of this meta-analysis were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test, and the I^2 statistic was estimated. Random-effect models, considering potential heterogeneity, were employed to combine the results.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis encompassed 17 cohort studies involving 6273 patients with cirrhosis, of whom 1983 (31.6%) were classified as frail at baseline. The follow-up periods in the included studies ranged from 3 to 29 months, with an average duration of 11.5 months. The analysis revealed that frailty was significantly associated with a poor TFS (risk ratio [RR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.72 to 2.50, p<0.001; I2 = 51%). Sensitivity analyses that sequentially omitted one dataset consistently supported these findings (RR: 1.95 to 2.17, p<0.05 in all cases). Subgroup analyses based on variables such as study design, mean age of patients, baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tool used for frailty evaluation, follow-up duration, and study quality score also yielded congruent results.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that frailty may be an independent risk factor for poor TFS in patients with liver cirrhosis, thus emphasizing the importance of early identification and management of frailty in this population.

Home exercise, branched-chain amino acids, and probiotics improve frailty in cirrhosis: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a predictive factor of hospitalization, falls, and mortality in patients with cirrhosis, regardless of the degree of liver failure. The aim was to analyze whether a multifactorial intervention consisting of home-based exercise, branched-chain amino acids, and a multistrain probiotic can improve frailty in these patients.

METHODS

Outpatients with cirrhosis were classified according to the Liver Frailty Index (LFI). Prefrail and frail patients were randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group was assigned to a multifactorial intervention consisting of exercise at home, branched-chain amino acid supplements, and a multistrain probiotic for 12 months. The control group received standard care. All patients were prospectively followed up every 3 months for 1 year to determine LFI, incidence of falls, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included: 17 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. In the intervention group, the baseline LFI decreased at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (p = 0.019 for overall change with respect to the control group). The change in LFI (ΔLFI) at 12 months was -0.71 ± 0.24 in the intervention group and -0.09 ± 0.32 in the control group (p<0.001). During follow-up, patients in the intervention group had a lower 1-year probability of falls (6% vs. 47%, p = 0.03) and emergency room visits (10% vs. 44%, p = 0.04) than patients in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A long-term multifactorial intervention that included exercise at home, branched-chain amino acids, and a multistrain probiotic improved frailty in outpatients with cirrhosis and was associated with a decrease in the incidence of clinical events such as falls and emergency room visits.

Editorial: Enhancing frailty assessment in liver transplantation candidates-The role of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in predicting mortality and guiding prehabilitation. Authors' reply

This article is linked to Williams et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17834 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17860

Multimodal prehabilitation program in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: keypoints for an implementation protocol and literature review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgical procedure are still very high. The implementation of a multimodal prehabilitation program could improve these outcomes. Based on our experience and that of the literature in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, we propose a protocol to promote its implementation.

METHODS

First, we performed a retrospective analysis of the implementation feasibility of a multimodal prehabilitation program in patients' candidates for elective perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery in our center. Second, we conducted a literature search of publications in PubMed until December 2022. Relevant data about hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery and prehabilitation programs in features and postoperative outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Since October 2020, 11 patients were evaluated for prehabilitation in our hospital. Two of them could not be resected intraoperatively due to disease extension. The median hospital stay was 10 days (iqr, 7-11). There were no major complications and 1 patient died. Of a total of 17 articles related to prehabilitation in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, no reports focusing exclusively on perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were found. Six of the studies had nutritional therapies in addition to physical interventions, and 12 studies used home-based exercise therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience and the data obtained from other studies, a prehabilitation program could be useful to improve perioperative physical and mental fitness in patients' candidates for elective perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery. However, more well-designed studies are needed to allow us to obtain more evidence.

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients into routine health care: a realist review

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of prehabilitation as a new preoperative care pathway to optimise perioperative outcomes, its implementation into routine health care is widely pending. Frail patients might particularly benefit from prehabilitation interventions, but facilitating and hindering factors need to be considered in the implementation process. Thus, our aim was to derive a programme theory on what prehabilitation programmes work for frail patients in what circumstances and why.

METHODS

Following Pawson's realist review approach, preliminary programme theories on facilitators and barriers were established. General and topic-specific databases were searched systematically for facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients. Articles were included if they dealt with multimodal prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery in a frail population and if they contained information on facilitators and barriers during the implementation process in the full text. Based on these articles, refined programme theories were generated.

RESULTS

From 2,609 unique titles, 34 were retained for the realist synthesis. Facilitating factors included the individualisation of prehabilitation programmes to meet the patients' needs and abilities, multimodality, adaption to the local setting and health care system, endorsement by an ambassador and sharing of responsibilities among a multidisciplinary team. Central barriers for frail patients were transportation, lack of social support, and inadequate, overwhelming information provision.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing prehabilitation as a new care pathway for frail patients requires organisational readiness and adaptability to the local setting. On an individual level, a clear understanding of responsibilities and of the intervention's goal among patients and providers are necessary. Added attention must be paid to the individualisation to fit the needs and restrictions of frail patients. This makes prehabilitation a resource-intense, but promising intervention for frail surgery patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022335282).

A randomized, controlled, prehabilitation intervention to maximize early recovery (PRIMER) in liver transplantation

Frailty and impaired functional status are associated with adverse outcomes on the liver transplant (LT) waitlist and after transplantation. Prehabilitation prior to LT has rarely been tested. We conducted a 2-arm patient-randomized pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a 14-week behavioral intervention to promote physical activity prior to LT. Thirty patients were randomized 2:1 to intervention (n = 20) versus control (n = 10). The intervention arm received financial incentives and text-based reminders linked to wearable fitness trackers. Daily step goals were increased by 15% in 2-week intervals. Weekly check-ins with study staff assessed barriers to physical activity. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included mean end-of-study step counts, short physical performance battery, grip strength, and body composition by phase angle. We fit regression models for secondary outcomes with the arm as the exposure adjusting for baseline performance. The mean age was 61, 47% were female, and the median Model for End-stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) was 13. One-third were frail or prefrail by the liver frailty index, 40% had impaired mobility by short physical performance battery, nearly 40% had sarcopenia by bioimpedance phase angle, 23% had prior falls, and 53% had diabetes. Study retention was 27/30 (90%; 2 unenrolled from intervention, 1 lost to follow-up in control arm). Self-reported adherence to exercise during weekly check-ins was about 50%; the most common barriers were fatigue, weather, and liver-related symptoms. End-of-study step counts were nearly 1000 steps higher for intervention versus control: adjusted difference 997, 95% CI, 147-1847; p = 0.02. On average, the intervention group achieved daily step targets 51% of the time. A home-based intervention with financial incentives and text-based nudges was feasible, highly accepted, and increased daily steps in LT candidates with functional impairment and malnutrition.

Getting your transplant center ready for prime time: Health care system obstacles to prehabilitation

1_i4s1nhjfKaltura.

Use of a Mobile-Assisted Telehealth Regimen to Increase Exercise in Transplant Candidates: A Home-Based Prehabilitation Pilot and Feasibility Trial

INTRODUCTION

Physical fitness assessed by the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) informs the prognosis of liver transplant candidates, although there are limited data on its reversibility after prehabilitation. On a home-based exercise trial, we aimed to improve LFI and 6MWT and to investigate trial feasibility and intervention adherence.

METHODS

Liver transplant candidates with cirrhosis wore a personal activity tracker and used Exercise and Liver FITness app for 14 weeks, including a 2-week technology acclimation run-in. The 12-week intervention consisted of Exercise and Liver FITness app plus personal activity tracker and 15-/30-minute weekly calls with a physical activity coach aiming to complete ≥2 video-training sessions/week, or ≥500 step/d baseline increase for ≥8 weeks. We defined feasibility as ≥66% of subjects engaging in the intervention phase and adherence as ≥50% subjects meeting training end point.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (61 ± 7 years, 71% female, model for end-stage liver disease 17 ± 5, ∼33% frail) consented and 21 (68%) started the intervention. In the 15 subjects who completed the study, LFI improved from 3.84 ± 0.71 to 3.47 ± 0.90 ( P = 0.03) and 6MWT from 318 ± 73 to 358 ± 64 m ( P = 0.005). Attrition reasons included death (n = 4) and surgery (n = 2). There was 57% adherence, better for videos than for walking, although daily steps significantly increased (3,508 vs baseline: 1,260) during best performance week. One adverse event was attributed to the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Our clinical trial meaningfully improved LFI by 0.4 and 6MWT by 41 m and met feasibility/adherence goals. In-training daily step increase supported physical self-efficacy and intervention uptake, but maintenance remained a challenge despite counseling.

Exercise training as an intervention for frailty in cirrhotic patients on the liver transplant waiting list: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The existing literature suggests that exercise for cirrhotic patients is safe and favours significant improvement to their physical capacity. However, exercise training for this population and how to deliver activities, especially in severe stages of the disease and while waiting for a liver transplant (LT), remain undefined.

AIM

To review the existing exercise prescriptions for cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for LT, their results for frailty evolution and their effect on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and searching the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. The keyword "liver transplant" was used in combination with the free terms "frailty" and "exercise" for the literature review. Clinical studies that evaluated the effect of a regular training program, independent of supervision or the duration or intensity of physical exercise, in cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for LT were reviewed. The data on safe physical activity prescriptions following Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type recommendations were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

Nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Various instruments for frailty assessment were used, frequently in combination. Five studies prescribed physical activity for patients, one in-person and four to be performed remotely and unsupervised. The remaining four studies only used a self-report instrument to assess the level of physical activity. None reported adverse events related to exercise training. The exercise frequency mainly varied from daily to a minimum of twice per week. The intensity depended on frailty and included increasing levels of activity. The type of exercise was predominantly a combination of aerobic and resistance training. The duration of exercise varied from 4 to 12 wk. Three articles evaluated the effect of the exercise program on clinical outcomes, reporting a reduction in 90-d readmission rates post-transplant and improved frailty scores, as well as improved survival of cirrhotic patients waiting for LT.

CONCLUSION

Routine frailty assessment is essential for this population. Although more robust evidence is required, the prescription of exercise is safe and can improve patients' functional capacity, improving pre- and post-LT outcomes.

Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis poses a significant challenge due to the associated peri-operative morbidity and mortality risks. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes in this cohort of patients following colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases and references were searched up to October 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. The data collated included: patient demographics, pathology or type of colorectal operation performed, severity of liver cirrhosis, post-operative complication rates, mortality rates and prognostic factors. A quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies reporting the outcomes of colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis were identified, including the results of 8646 patients. The indications, pathologies and/or type of operations varied. The overall complication rate ranged from 29 to 75%, minor complication ranged 14.5-37% and major complication ranged 6.7-59.3%. The mortality rates ranged from 0 to 37%.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis still carries considerable morbidity and mortality rates. This group of patients needs to be managed in a multidisciplinary setting to achieve excellent outcomes. Future research should focus on uniform definitions to enable interpretable outcomes.

Concepts for exercise therapy in prehabilitation for elderly people with frailty or pre-frailty prior to elective surgery. A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a state of reduced functional capacities in older people that can be reversed through multimodal therapy concepts. The effect of preoperative prehabilitation on frailty has been examined, but the heterogeneity of exercise regimens has prevented conclusive evidence. This scoping review analyses prehabilitation interventions, particularly exercise methods, published in trials for prefrail and frail elderly patients.

METHOD

We identified studies evaluating prehabilitation for frail elderly using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Five scientific databases were searched until March 2022. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction included, but was not limited to, study design, intervention protocol of the prehabilitation including exercise therapy and additional interventions, and safety of the reported exercise concepts.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included, offering an insight into the utilized prehabilitation concepts for exercise. All study interventions were based around exercise programs, potentially with complementary interventions. Twelve studies based their exercise programs on a combination of endurance and strength training. Breathing exercises were prescribed in five studies, flexibility routines in five, and one study included balance training. Further interventions included nutritional counselling/supplementation in nine studies, smoking/alcohol cessation in five, in addition to two physiological and three medical/pharmaceutical interventions.

DISCUSSION

Prehabilitation for the frail elderly is safe and feasible. The general concept of prehabiliation for frail patients is promising. An exercise program should focus on improving the patient's endurance and strength, considering the positive effects that can be provided by breathing exercises and other additional interventions, such as nutritional support or lifestyle counselling.

Pulmonary Assessment of the Liver Transplant Recipient

Respiratory symptoms and hypoxemia can complicate chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. Various pulmonary disorders affecting the pleura, lung parenchyma, and pulmonary vasculature are seen in end-stage liver disease, complicating liver transplantation (LT). Approximately 8% of cirrhotic patients in an intensive care unit develop severe pulmonary problems. These disorders affect waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes. A thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests help diagnose and assess the severity to risk stratify pulmonary diseases before LT. Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) are respiratory consequences specific to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. HPS is seen in 5-30% of cirrhosis cases and is characterized by impaired oxygenation due to intrapulmonary vascular dilatations and arteriovenous shunts. Severe HPS is an indication of LT. The majority of patients with HPS resolve their hypoxemia after LT. When pulmonary arterial hypertension occurs in patients with portal hypertension, it is called POPH. All other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension should be ruled out before labeling as POPH. Since severe POPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] >50 mm Hg) is a relative contraindication for LT, it is crucial to screen for POPH before LT. Those with moderate POPH (mPAP >35 mm Hg), who improve with medical therapy, will benefit from LT. A transudative pleural effusion called hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is seen in 5-10% of people with cirrhosis. Refractory cases of HH benefit from LT. In recent years, increasing clinical expertise and advances in the medical field have resulted in better outcomes in patients with moderate to severe pulmonary disorders, who undergo LT.

Accumulating awareness on the clinical significance and relevance of frailty in cirrhosis: Time to dig deeper into mechanistic basis!

Frailty corresponds to an emerging construct in the hepatology which is originally introduced as a validated geriatric syndrome regarding increased vulnerability to pathophysiological stressors. As for patients with cirrhosis, the presence of frailty is indicative of debilitating conditions that subjects are prone to deleterious acute insults and have difficulties to restore even if the underlying liver function partially returned to normal levels. Since this conceptual development, a variety of tools assessing frailty have been proposed and evaluated in the context of cirrhosis. A recent performance-based metric for frailty, designated as Liver Frailty Index, has broadly been applied in patients with cirrhosis and exhibited acceptable predictive ability in relation to disease progression, mortality and hospitalization. However, those functional tests measuring frailty may be impossible to perform in circumstance that patients are critically ill or undergoing detrimental events. An interesting modality indicates the use of alternative tests to evaluate frailty, which may be more adaptable and of choice for specific subgroups. The interrelation between frailty and various cirrhosis-associated pathological entities is of clinical importance and implication. Noticeably, it is imperative to clarify these complex linkages to highlight novel therapeutic targets or interventional endpoints. The efficient and effective management of frailty is still challenging, but many attempts have been made to overcome barriers of affordability and availability. Some clinical trials on small scale revealed that home-based exercise and individualized nutrition therapy show benefits in patients with cirrhosis, and high adherence to the treatment regimen may direct better efficacy and performance.

Reduced 3-year risk of hospital admission and mortality after 12-week resistance training of cirrhosis patients: A follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Physical activity confers health benefits in many diseases but remains almost unstudied for cirrhosis. We investigated whether a period of resistance training affects the subsequent long-term risk of hospitalization or mortality among patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

The study includes 39 participants with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class A/B who participated in a prior clinical trial randomized to either resistance training three times per week for 12 weeks or a control group. We gathered data through medical records from trial entry and the following 3 years. The outcomes were time to first hospitalization and all-cause mortality. We used regression models to examine the associations between trial groups and outcomes, adjusting for Child-Pugh class, age, gender, and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Nine patients who trained and 15 controls were hospitalized, resulting in a lower risk of first hospitalization in the training group (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.17, 0.92]; P = 0.03). One patient who trained and six controls died, resulting in a lower all-cause mortality in the training group (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.66]; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Twelve weeks of resistance training was associated with a reduced risk of first hospitalization and mortality among patients with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class A/B 3 years after trial entry. The mechanisms of this effect are not identified, and larger studies are warranted.

European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Prehabilitation for Solid Organ Transplantation Candidates

There is increasingly growing evidence and awareness that prehabilitation in waitlisted solid organ transplant candidates may benefit clinical transplant outcomes and improve the patient's overall health and quality of life. Lifestyle changes, consisting of physical training, dietary management, and psychosocial interventions, aim to optimize the patient's physical and mental health before undergoing surgery, so as to enhance their ability to overcome procedure-associated stress, reduce complications, and accelerate post-operative recovery. Clinical data are promising but few, and evidence-based recommendations are scarce. To address the need for clinical guidelines, The European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated Working Group "Prehabilitation in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates," comprising experts in physical exercise, nutrition and psychosocial interventions, to review the literature on prehabilitation in this population, and develop recommendations. These were discussed and voted upon during the Consensus Conference in Prague, 13-15 November 2022. A high degree of consensus existed amongst all stakeholders including transplant recipients and their representatives. Ten recommendations were formulated that are a balanced representation of current published evidence and real-world practice. The findings and recommendations of the Working Group on Prehabilitation for solid organ transplant candidates are presented in this article.

CT-quantified sarcopenic visceral obesity is associated with poor transplant waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than seen with either sarcopenia or obesity alone. We aimed to define sarcopenic visceral obesity (SVO) using CT-quantified skeletal muscle index and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio and to examine its association with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Included were 326 adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation in the ambulatory setting with available abdominal CT within 6 months from enrollment between February 2015 and January 2018. SVO was defined as patients with sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index <50 cm 2 /m 2 in men and <39 cm 2 /m 2 in women) and visceral obesity (visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio ≥1.21 in men and ≥0.48 in women). The percentage who met criteria for sarcopenia, visceral obesity, and SVO were 44%, 29%, and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality was higher in patients with SVO compared to patients with sarcopenia without visceral obesity or visceral obesity without sarcopenia at 12 months (40% vs. 21% vs. 12%) (overall logrank p =0.003). In univariable Cox regression, SVO was associated with waitlist mortality (HR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.58-7.39), which remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, ascites, encephalopathy, MELDNa, liver frailty index, and different body compositions (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.11-6.30). SVO was associated with increase waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis in the ambulatory setting awaiting liver transplantation. Concurrent loss of skeletal muscle and gain of adipose tissue seen in SVO quantified by CT may be a useful and objective measurement to identify patients at risk for suboptimal pretransplant outcomes.

Six-Minute walk distance predicts outcomes in liver transplant candidates

A 6-minute walk test is a simple tool for assessing submaximal exercise capacity. We sought to determine whether a 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) predicts outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. The Pulmonary Vascular Complications of Liver Disease 2 study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study that enrolled adults with portal hypertension during liver transplantation evaluation. We excluded subjects with an incident or prevalent portopulmonary hypertension. The 6-minute walk test was performed using standardized methods. Cox proportional hazards modeling and multivariable linear regression analysis were performed to determine the relationship between baseline 6MWD and outcomes. The study sample included 352 subjects. The mean 6MWD was 391±101 m. For each 50-meter decrease in 6MWD, there was a 25% increase in the risk of death (HR 1.25, 95% CI [1.11, 1.41], p < 0.001) after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, MELD-Na, and liver transplant as a time-varying covariate. In a multistate model, each 50-meter decrease in 6MWD was associated with an increased risk of death before the liver transplant ( p < 0.001) but not after the transplant. 6MWD was similar to MELD-Na in discriminating mortality. Each 50-meter decrease in 6MWD was associated with an increase in all-cause ( p < 0.001) and transplant-free hospitalizations ( p < 0.001) in multivariable models for time-to-recurrent events. Shorter 6MWD was associated with worse Short Form-36 physical ( p < 0.001) and mental component scores ( p = 0.05). In conclusion, shorter 6MWD is associated with an increased risk of death, hospitalizations, and worse quality of life in patients evaluated for liver transplantation. The 6-minute walk distance may be a useful adjunct for risk assessment in patients undergoing liver transplant evaluation.

Systematic review: the role of frailty in advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a known predictor of outcome and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, most patients remain unsuitable transplant candidates. It is not yet known if the assessment of frailty in non-transplant candidates can aid prognostication.

AIM

To collate and interrogate the various frailty tools presently used to predict mortality in the non-transplant cirrhosis setting.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published from inception to March 2022 was undertaken, excluding those where patients underwent transplantation or had hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

We identified 12 observational cohort studies, featuring 9 frailty indices. These were from various global healthcare settings and of fair or good quality. Most were objective tools utilising clinician-based assessments. All frailty scores predicted prognosis, with variability in the method of application, and utilisation in long- or short-term mortality. Three studies directly compared different indices in the same population. There was some evidence that simple tools could perform as well, if not better, than more complex, time-consuming scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Various frailty tools can reproducibly evaluate mortality in patients with cirrhosis who are ineligible for transplant. However, further prospective head-to-head comparative studies are needed. In addition to determining model utility, studies should focus on important relative considerations which may limit widespread implementation including, ease of use and limited resources, given the global disparity of liver care provision. These tools may positively identify specific patient cohorts at risk of impending deterioration, thereby stratifying those patients likely to benefit from early integration with palliative care.

Prehabilitation in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Candidates

Purpose of Review

To highlight the importance of biological age in the context of prehabilitation and to present relevant research regarding prehabilitation prior to solid organ transplantation.

Recent Findings

Studies on the effect of prehabilitation have been performed in kidney-, lung-, liver-, and heart transplant patient populations. Prior to kidney transplantation, exercise interventions have been shown to improve cardiopulmonary- and physical fitness and result in a decreased length of hospital stay postoperatively. Among lung transplant candidates, various methods of prehabilitation have been studied including home-based, outpatient and in-patient programs, consisting of physical training, psychological support, education, and nutritional interventions. Overall, prehabilitation seems to improve or maintain quality of life and exercise capacity in this patient population. Patients undergoing liver transplantation seem to benefit from prehabilitation as well. Not only does it seem safe and feasible, but significant improvements in aerobic and functional capacity have also been found. Regarding heart transplant candidates, both inpatient and outpatient, supervised prehabilitation programs show promising results with improvements in exercise capacities and quality of life.

Summary

Prehabilitation is an effective and safe intervention for improving functional outcomes of solid organ transplant patients. Future studies should evaluate whether prehabilitation translates into improved pre- and post-transplant clinical outcomes.

Does Exercise Training Improve Physical Fitness and Health in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impaired physical fitness of end-stage liver disease patients often persists after liver transplantation (LT) and compromises posttransplant recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated evidence supporting the potential of exercise training to improve physical fitness and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after LT.

METHODS

Bibliographic searches identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing aerobic and strength training versus usual care after LT. Risk of bias was assessed, and study outcomes measuring physical fitness and HRQOL were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed if at least 3 studies reported on an outcome.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs (n = 334) were identified. Methodological study quality varied and was poorly reported. Meta-analyses showed a trend for favorable effects of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen uptake or 6-min walking distance; 6 studies, n = 275; standardized mean difference: 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.48) and of strength training either or not combined with aerobic training on muscular fitness (dynamometry-assessed muscle strength or 30-s sit-to-stand test; 3 studies, n = 114; standardized mean difference: 0.34, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.72). A favorable effect was found for exercise on the Short-Form Health Survey-36 HRQOL physical function subcomponent (3 studies, n = 194; mean difference: 9.1, 95% CI, 0.3-17.8). No exercise-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs indicate that exercise training in LT recipients is safe, improves physical function aspects of HRQOL, and may benefit cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness. The strength of evidence is, however, limited by the low number of patients and study quality. More adequately powered, high-quality RCTs are warranted.

Frailty and solid-organ transplant candidates: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus as to a standardized tool for frailty measurement in any patient population. In the solid-organ transplantation population, routinely identifying and quantifying frailty in potential transplant candidates would support patients and the multidisciplinary team to make well-informed, individualized, management decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise the literature regarding frailty measurement in solid-organ transplant (SOT) candidates.

METHODS

A search of four databases (Cochrane, Pubmed, EMBASE and CINAHL) yielded 3124 studies. 101 studies (including heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant candidate populations) met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We found that studies used a wide range of frailty tools (N = 22), including four 'established' frailty tools. The most commonly used tools were the Fried Frailty Phenotype and the Liver Frailty Index. Frailty prevalence estimates for this middle-aged, predominantly male, population varied between 2.7% and 100%. In the SOT candidate population, frailty was found to be associated with a range of adverse outcomes, with most evidence for increased mortality (including post-transplant and wait-list mortality), post-operative complications and prolonged hospitalisation. There is currently insufficient data to compare the predictive validity of frailty tools in the SOT population.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is great variability in the approach to frailty measurement in this population. Preferably, a validated frailty measurement tool would be incorporated into SOT eligibility assessments internationally with a view to facilitating comparisons between patient sub-groups and national and international transplant services with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.

Physical prehabilitation improves the postoperative outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in experimental model

Aiming to improve the postoperative outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), the effect of physical prehabilitation (PP) was investigated in experimental model. Male Wistar rats (n = 106) divided to PP and sedentary (S) groups underwent ALPPS. Changes in liver weight, Ki67 index and liver volume by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated. Liver function was assessed by laboratory parameters and ^99mTc-mebrofenin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS). Utilizing endotoxemia model mortality and septic parameters were investigated. Liver mass (p < 0.001), Ki67 index (p < 0.001) and MRI liver volume (p < 0.05) increased in the PP group compared to the S group. Both standard laboratory parameters (p < 0.001) and HBS (p < 0.05) showed enhanced liver function in the PP group compared to the S group. The vulnerability of animals improved in the PP group, as mortality decreased (p < 0.001), while septic laboratory parameters improved (p < 0.05) compared to the S group in the endotoxemia model. Our study demonstrated for the first time the beneficial role of PP on not only volumetric but also functional liver regeneration and postoperative vulnerability after ALLPS.

Digital interventions in the management of advanced liver disease: Prescription and monitoring of healthy living in homes

Content available: Audio Recording.

The role of prehabilitation on short-term outcomes after liver transplantation: A review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation programs as part of ERAS protocols are being increasingly used in multiple surgeries, improving postoperative outcomes. Data regarding prehabilitation programs in patients awaiting liver transplantation and their outcomes is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether prehabilitation programs based on exercise training conducted prior to liver transplantation improve short-term postoperative outcomes, and to provide expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Studies included those evaluating postoperative outcomes, as well as those evaluating functional outcomes.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021236305.

RESULTS

Of the 170 studies screened, only one assessed the primary objective. Most studies focus on the preoperative impact of exercise training on aerobic capacity, muscle mass and/or strength, showing positive effects and no significant adverse events, but are underpowered and with heterogenous designs and interventions. The non-randomized observational study which assessed relevant postoperative outcomes, showed a non-significant trend towards reduced 90-day readmission rate and shorter length of stay in the prehabilitation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation prior to liver transplantation is unlikely to be harmful, and likely to have short term benefits on functional status. We cautiously recommend prehabilitation on the basis of absence of harm and possibility of benefit (Quality of Evidence; Very Low | Grade of Recommendation; Low).

Physical Effects, Safety and Feasibility of Prehabilitation in Patients Awaiting Orthotopic Liver Transplantation, a Systematic Review

Prehabilitation improves surgical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. However, patients preparing for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are physically “frail” and suffer from comorbidities that generally hamper physical activity. This systematic review aims to evaluate the physical effects, safety and feasibility of prehabilitation in OLT candidates. Relevant articles were searched, in Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Medline and Google Scholar, to December 2021. Studies reporting on specified preoperative exercise programs, including adult OLT candidates with end-stage liver disease, with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥12 or Child-Pugh classification B/C, were included. This resulted in 563 potentially eligible studies, out of which eight were selected for inclusion, consisting of 1,094 patients (male sex 68%; mean age 51–61 years; mean MELD score 12-21). Six of the included studies were classified as low-quality by the GRADE system, and three studies had high risk for ineffectiveness of the training program according to the i-CONTENT tool. Significant improvement was observed in VO2 peak, 6-minute walking distance, hand grip strength, liver frailty index and quality of life. Feasibility ranged from an adherence of 38%–90% in unsupervised-to &gt;94% in supervised programs. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, prehabilitation in patients awaiting OLT appears to improve aerobic capacity, and seems feasible and safe. However, larger clinical trials are required to accurately examine the preoperative and postoperative effects of prehabilitation in this specific patient population.

Mastering Core Recommendations during HEPAtology ROUNDS in Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Efficient and thorough care of hospitalized patients with advanced chronic liver disease is of utter importance to improve outcomes and optimize quality of life. This requires understanding current evidence and best practices. To facilitate focus on up-to-date knowledge and a practical approach, we have created the HEPA-ROUNDS mnemonic while outlining a practical review of the literature with critical appraisal for the busy clinician. The HEPA-ROUNDS mnemonic provides a structured approach that incorporates critical concepts in terms of prevention, management, and prognostication of the most common complications frequently encountered in patients with advanced chronic liver disease. In addition, implementing the HEPA-ROUNDS mnemonic can facilitate education for trainees and staff caring for patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

Low Daily Step Count Is Associated With a High Risk of Hospital Admission and Death in Community-Dwelling Patients With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Daily step count measures cardiorespiratory fitness and has been associated with clinical outcomes. However, its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains largely unexplored. We aimed to investigate the association between step count, frailty metrics, and clinical outcomes in cirrhosis.

METHODS

All participants underwent frailty evaluation with the liver frailty index, 6-minute walk test, and gait speed test. To monitor step count, participants were given a personal activity tracker (PAT). A subset also was invited to use Exercise and Liver FITness (EL-FIT). Daily step counts from the first week of PAT use and frailty metrics were investigated as predictors of hospital admission and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 116 patients included (age, 56 ± 11 y; male, 55%; body mass index, 31 ± 7; model for end-stage liver disease-sodium, 15 ± 7). The main etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol-related (33%) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (30%). Monitoring for the week was accomplished in 80% of participants given both PAT+EL-FIT vs 62% in those with PAT only (P = .04). During follow-up evaluation, hospital admission was observed in 55% and death in 15%. Kaplan-Meir curves showed increased readmission and deaths among patients performing in the lowest quartile (ie, <1200 steps/d). When adjusted by model for end-stage liver disease-sodium and EL-FIT use, the lowest quartile was associated with hospital admission and death (hazard ratio, HR [95% confidence interval], 1.90 [1.09-3.30] and 3.46 [1.23-9.68], respectively), along with the 6-minute walk test (HR, 0.63 [0.47-0.83] and 0.66 [0.44-0.99] per 100 m, respectively) and gait speed test (HR, 0.29 [0.11-0.72] and 0.21 [0.05-0.84], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily step count predicted hospital admission and mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis, similar to the current standard frailty metrics. Incorporation of a physical training-dedicated smartphone application was associated with increased PAT use and step reporting.

A Telemedicine Alternative to the 6-Minute Walk Test Using Personal Activity Trackers in Liver Transplant Candidates

The COVID-19 pandemic has limited liver transplant (LT) candidates access to clinics. Telehealth methods to assess frailty are needed. We developed a method to estimate the step length of LT candidates, which would permit remotely obtaining the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance with a personal activity tracker (PAT).

Methods

6MWT was performed while candidates wore a PAT. On first 21 subjects (stride cohort), the step length was measured and compared with calculated one (6MWT-distance/6MWT steps). On a second cohort (PAT-6MWT; n = 116), we collected the 6MWT step count and used multivariable models to generate formulas estimating step length. We multiplied the estimated step length times 6MWT steps to estimate the distance and compared it to the measured distance. The liver frailty index (LFI) and 6MWT were used as frailty metrics.

Results

Measured/calculated step length were highly correlated (ρ = 0.85; P < 0.001) in the stride cohort. In the PAT-6MWT cohort, LFI was the strongest variable associated with step length, along with height, albumin, and large-volume paracentesis (R ² = 0.58). On a second model without LFI, age, height, albumin, hemoglobin, and large-volume paracentesis were strongly associated with step length (R ² = 0.45). There was a robust correlation between observed 6MWT and PAT-6MWT utilizing step length equations with (ρ = 0.80; P < 0.001) or without LFI (ρ = 0.75; P < 0.001). Frailty by 6MWT <250 m did not change significantly using the observed (16%) or the with/without LFI-estimated (14%/12%) methods.

Conclusions

We created a method to obtain 6MWT distance remotely with the use of a PAT. This novel approach opens the possibility of performing telemedicine PAT-6MWT to monitor LT candidates' frailty status.

CONUT Score Predicts Early Morbidity After Liver Transplantation: A Collaborative Study

Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) is burdened by the risk of post-operative morbidity. Identifying patients at higher risk of developing complications can help allocate resources in the perioperative phase. Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, based on lymphocyte count, serum albumin, and cholesterol levels, has been applied to various surgical specialties, proving reliable in predicting complications and prognosis. Our study aims to investigate the role of the CONUT score in predicting the development of early complications (within 90 days) after LT.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 209 patients with a calculable CONUT score within 2 months before LT. The ability of the CONUT score to predict severe complications, defined as a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) ≥42.1, was examined. Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting was used to balance the study population against potential confounders.

Results: Patients with a CCI ≥42.1 had higher CONUT score values (median: 7 vs. 5, P-value < 0.0001). The CONUT score showed a good diagnostic ability regarding post-LT morbidity, with an AUC = 0.72 (95.0%CI = 0.64–0.79; P-value < 0.0001). The CONUT score was the only independent risk factor identified for a complicated post-LT course, with an odds ratio = 1.39 (P-value < 0.0001). The 90-day survival rate was 98.8% and 87.5% for patients with a CONUT score <8 and ≥8, respectively.

Conclusions: Pre-operative CONUT score is a helpful tool to identify patients at increased post-LT morbidity risk. Further refinements in the score composition, specific to the LT population, could be obtained with prospective studies.