Tofacitinib in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (TACOS): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Predicting Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) (ASUC) requiring hospitalization affects up to 1 in 4 patients with UC. There is a paucity of prospective and multicenter clinical cohorts to study treatment trends and predictors of disease outcomes. Here, we conduct a US-based multicenter prospective clinical cohort of ASUC to study predictors of the need for medical rescue therapy and colectomy.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients hospitalized for ASUC were included across 5 academic centers from December 2018 to December 2021. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected throughout the hospitalization. Patients were followed up to 1-year post-hospitalization to identify predictors of the need for rescue therapy and colectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 21 (22.3%) patients required colectomy within 1 year of admission with 11 (12%) requiring colectomy during the index admission. On multivariate analyses, a BMI < 21.5 kg/m2 (OR = 6.16, P = .02), a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) greater than 8 (OR = 14.44, P = .01) and an albumin level at admission lower than 2.4 g/dL (OR = 10.61, P = .04) were significant predictors of inpatient colectomy after adjusting for sex, age, and duration of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized with ASUC, BMI, SCCAI, and albumin at admission were important determinants of colectomy risk during the index hospitalization and within 1 year of admission. Colectomy rates remain high-22.3% in this cohort across 5 academic, tertiary care centers-underscoring the need to identify the highest-risk patients, establish novel treatment and care paradigms, and examine opportunities to standardize care.

Postoperative Outcomes in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Colectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Up to 30% of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) will require urgent colectomy despite initiation of intravenous corticosteroids and rescue therapies. Janus kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, have emerged as an effective agent for ASUC; however, there are currently limited data evaluating the risk of postoperative complications among patients who received tofacitinib treatment for an episode of ASUC compared with infliximab.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of patients hospitalized with ASUC who underwent colectomy, comparing patients treated with tofacitinib prior to colectomy with infliximab-treated controls. The primary outcome was rate of serious postoperative complications within 30 days of colectomy. Outcomes were compared between the tofacitinib-treated cases and infliximab-treated controls using multivariable regression adjusted for open surgery and cumulative corticosteroid exposure.

RESULTS

Forty-one tofacitinib-treated patients were compared with 68 infliximab-treated patients with ASUC. Compared with tofacitinib-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had higher overall rates of overall (44 [64.7%] vs 13 [31.7%]; P = .002) and serious (19 [27.9%] vs 3 [12%]; P = .019) postoperative complications. No significant different risk for developing serious postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.96; P = .061) was observed in multivariable analysis; however, a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.87; P = .023) was observed in tofacitinib-treated patients compared with infliximab-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative complications in ASUC patients treated with tofacitinib compared with infliximab; however, no difference was observed in the risk for serious postoperative complications. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Medical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis in the hospitalized patient

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one in every four patients with ulcerative colitis will develop acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Historically, this was managed with intravenous steroids and surgery when steroids failed. The use of rescue therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the latest research in the management of hospitalized patients with ASUC. Covering the historical data and success of rescue therapy with cyclosporine and then with infliximab changed outcomes and reduced the risk of colectomy during the hospitalization and at 1 year. More recently, more biologics and small molecules have been approved and more patients present to the hospital with ASUC already failing anti-tumor necrosis factor antagonists. More recent studies have shown some efficacy of rescue therapy with other classes of biologics (e.g. interleukins and anti-integrins). The more recently approved small molecules (i.e. tofacitinib and Upadacitinib) have shown a rapid onset in therapeutic efficacy in as little as 1 day with sustained response at 1 year in reducing the risk of colectomy following ASUC.

EXPERT OPINION

In the expert opinion, we discuss the challenges in the treatment of patients with ASUC. We summarize the data of current biologics and new small molecules and their emerging roles in the management of ASUC.

[Update on drug therapy for ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is classified as a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and can present in various degrees of severity. In addition to mild courses of the disease, such as uncomplicated proctitis, which can often be successfully treated with topical 5-ASA formulations, complicated courses can be observed, which can sometimes be life-threatening. Affected patients are often considerably burdened and often severely restricted in their quality of life, as they suffer from numerous, often bloody bowel movements, which are accompanied by abdominal cramps, urgency and sometimes even incontinence. In addition, many UC patients suffer from concomitant extraintestinal inflammatory manifestations including skin manifestations like psoriasis, erythema nodosum or joint involvement such as spondylarthritis. For many years, steroids and conventional immunosuppressants such as azathioprine were the only treatment options available. Twenty years ago, the approval of the first anti-TNF antibody, Infliximab, marked a significant turning point in IBD therapy. Despite the continuous progress in drug therapy, the rates of primary and/or secondary treatment failure are still considerable. With this in mind, a large number of additional substances have been developed and approved for the treatment of UC in the recent years. In addition to TNF antibodies and their biosimilars, the anti-integrin vedolizumab, various Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, an interleukin (IL)-12/-23p40 antibody, various IL-23p19 antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators have broadened the therapeutic landscape and found their way into the clinical treatment of UC patients. In this article we will discuss case-based decision paths for the selection of fitting anti-inflammatory treatments in UC patients and summarize the principles of the different therapeutic strategies for UC.

A practical approach to positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis

The therapeutic landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) has undergone significant change over the last 2 decades. While there are multiple new therapies for the management of UC, long-term remission rates remain low, and this may be in part due to the difficulty of navigating a successful treatment strategy. In this review, we propose a rational framework for treatment selection, sequencing, and optimization in patients with UC. We outline treatment goals and targets for UC, followed by a discussion of the challenges in treatment selection and considerations to help guide a sequencing strategy. These include an assessment of a therapy's efficacy and safety, the convenience in the delivery of the therapy, ease of access, and patient-related factors. We then provide an overview of the currently approved therapies for UC, with an in-depth analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we conclude with future directions in the management of UC, which include the use of naturopathic therapies, faecal microbiota therapy, the use of precision medicine, and other strategies such as combination therapy.

Inflammatory bowel disease in south Asia: a scoping review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising at an alarming rate in south Asia and there is a paucity of data on IBD in this region. For this scoping review, we conducted a systematic search to identify all observational and interventional studies on IBD in south Asia. Of 14 924 potentially eligible studies, 524 were included in this scoping review and summarised under the domains of epidemiology, natural history, phenotype and comorbid conditions, therapeutics, and psychosocial health. According to the literature, IBD incidence and prevalence are rising in south Asia and among south Asian immigrants, and the diagnostic rate is higher in men than in women. Genetic predisposition is an important risk factor in south Asia, whereas environmental risk factors are less clear. Delay in diagnosis, although possibly decreasing over time, is common in south Asia and is associated with worse outcomes. There are no clear differences in IBD phenotype and severity in south Asia relative to Europe and North America. Corticosteroids and immunomodulators are the mainstay of treatment in south Asia whereas the use of biologics is less common. Mental health disorders, malnutrition, and reduced quality of life are prevalent in patients with IBD in south Asia, and the use of complementary and alternative medicines among patients is an important consideration. Key knowledge gaps include the paucity of data from countries other than India, prospective, long-term, follow-up studies, and clinical drug trials in south Asia. IBD is a growing challenge in this region and warrants urgent clinical interventions, research, resource allocation, and health policy implementation.

Natural products for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: focus on the JAK/STAT pathway

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an autoimmune disease with an incompletely understood pathogenesis. The Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway plays a key role in immune response and inflammation. More and more studies demonstrated that JAK/STAT signaling pathway is associated with the pathogenesis of UC. The JAK/STAT pathway affects UC in multiple ways by regulating intestinal inflammatory response, affecting intestinal mucosal barrier, modulating T cell homeostasis, and regulating macrophages. Encouragingly, natural products are promising candidates for the treatment of UC. Natural products have the advantage of being multi-targeted and rich in therapeutic modalities. This review summarized the research progress of JAK/STAT pathway-mediated UC. Furthermore, the latest studies on natural products targeting the JAK/STAT pathway for the treatment of UC were systematically summarized, including active ingredients such as arbutin, aloe polysaccharide, berberine, matrine, curcumin, Ginsenoside Rh2, and so on. The aim of this paper is to provide new ideas for drug development to regulate JAK/STAT signaling for treating UC.

Small Molecules in the Treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Review of Current Evidence

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease in which one-quarter of patients are at risk of developing a severe form of the disease known as acute severe UC (ASUC). This condition exposes patients to serious complications, including toxic megacolon, surgical intervention, and even death. The current therapeutic strategy relies on time-dependent, multi-step algorithms that integrate systemic corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and biologic agents (specifically infliximab) as medical therapy aimed at avoiding colectomy. Despite this approach, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to either corticosteroids or infliximab and may require alternative therapeutic options if there is no urgent surgical necessity. These alternatives include other biologics or emerging small molecules, although the evidence supporting these treatments remains extremely low, even considering their well-documented and promising efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe UC. Conversely, it is necessary to investigate whether infliximab can be effectively replaced or surpassed by other approved biological agents and small molecules as first-line therapy after steroid resistance. This review aims to summarise the available evidence on small molecules, specifically Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators.

Systematic review: severe endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy and biopsy are the standard tools for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the assessment of treatment response. Severe endoscopic lesions (SEL) are commonly observed in IBD, but have been poorly described in the literature. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current understanding and gaps in knowledge about these lesions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies of SEL in patients with IBD. A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in July 2024. Studies were eligible if they investigated SEL, its involvement in the disease, its evolution with treatment, and its prognostic implications.

RESULTS

We found 1172 articles in the Pubmed database and 46 were included. Of the various definitions of SEL used in the literature, most of them are based on the most severe endoscopic items from existing endoscopic scores, but none have been validated. Despite the paucity of literature, the prevalence of SEL is estimated to be 33%-75% in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and 22.5%-87% in Crohn's disease (CD). In terms of prognosis, SEL are associated with steroid refractoriness in ASUC and do not affect response to infliximab or ciclosporin. In CD, the response to biologics, especially anti-TNF, is not affected by the presence of SEL.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no validated definition of SEL in IBD. When present, they are associated with steroid failure in the setting of ASUC, but do not affect response to anti-TNF in either CD or ASUC.

Janus kinase inhibitors in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

One-third of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are steroid-refractory. Cyclosporine and infliximab are currently the mainstays of salvage therapy. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) could play a role in the treatment of ASUC.

AIM

To review the evidence on JAKi in the management of ASUC.

METHODS

We performed a bibliographic search to identify studies focusing on the treatment of ASUC with JAKi.

RESULTS

Potential advantages of JAKi for the management of ASUC include their oral administration, rapid onset of action, short half-life, lack of immunogenicity, and effectiveness in patients with prior biologic exposure. Thirty studies (including 373 patients) have evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib in ASUC, with a response rate (avoidance of colectomy) ranging between 43% and 100%, with a weighted mean of 82%. Experience with upadacitinib is more limited (only 10 studies and 74 patients are available) but also encouraging: mean colectomy-free rate ranging between 67% and 100%, with a weighted mean of 79%. However, experience with filgotinib in ASUC is currently nonexistent. Regarding safety, the available data does not reveal any new safety concerns when JAKi are used in ASUC, although follow-up periods are still short.

CONCLUSION

JAKi seems to be a promising treatment option for ASUC, with both tofacitinib and upadacitinib achieving colectomy-free rates of approximately 80%. Further studies are essential to define whether JAKi can replace cyclosporine/infliximab as second-line therapy for the medical management of ASUC, or whether they can even be used as initial treatment in place of intravenous corticosteroids.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Stroke: Exploring Hidden Vascular Risks

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is primarily known for its gastrointestinal manifestations. However, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between IBD and an increased risk of stroke, likely mediated by chronic systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic state. Despite this growing recognition, the exact mechanisms and extent of this association remain unclear, highlighting a critical knowledge gap. This review aims to systematically analyze the association between IBD and stroke, exploring the underlying vascular mechanisms and identifying potential risk factors contributing to cerebrovascular events in IBD patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using keywords such as "IBD," "Stroke," "Chronic inflammation," "Cerebrovascular risk," and "Gut-brain axis." After screening 150 studies and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, six studies were included in the final synthesis. The findings suggest that chronic inflammation in IBD plays a key role in increasing stroke risk through endothelial dysfunction and a heightened prothrombotic state, with additional risk factors such as atrial fibrillation during active IBD flares further contributing to cerebrovascular events. While biologic therapies, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors, are effective in reducing systemic inflammation, their impact on mitigating stroke risk remains inconclusive. Given the potential role of IBD as an independent risk factor for stroke, a multidisciplinary approach to management is crucial. Addressing modifiable risk factors through pharmacologic interventions such as biologics, statins, and antiplatelet agents, alongside lifestyle modifications, could help reduce cerebrovascular complications in IBD patients. Further research is needed to explore personalized therapeutic strategies and establish clearer preventive guidelines for this at-risk population.

Modern Advanced Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Practical Considerations and Positioning

The therapeutic armamentarium for management of inflammatory bowel diseases has expanded dramatically in the last 5 years, with the introduction of several medications with different mechanisms of action. These include the oral small molecule drugs Janus kinase inhibitors (including upadacitinib, approved for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [UC], and tofacitinib, approved for UC) and sphingosphine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (ozanimod and etrasimod, both approved for UC), and biologic agents, such as selective interleukin-23 antagonists (risankizumab approved for Crohn's disease, and mirikizumab approved for UC). The efficacy and safety of these therapies vary. In this review, we discuss practical use of these newer advanced therapies focusing on real-world effectiveness and safety data, dosing and monitoring considerations, and special situations for their use, such as pregnancy, comorbid immune-mediated disease, use in hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, and in the perioperative setting. We also propose our approach to positioning these therapies in clinical practice, relying on careful integration of the medication's comparative effectiveness and safety in the context of an individual patient's risk of disease- and treatment-related complications and preferences.

Small Molecules, Big Results: How JAK Inhibitors Have Transformed the Treatment of Patients with IBD

Small molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have revolutionized the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) through their low immunogenicity, safety, and consistent pharmacologic response that are superior to existing therapeutic options. In this perspective, we highlight existing evidence supporting the use of currently approved JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and filgotinib) for UC or CD, additionally emphasizing the evidence for their use in related autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies. Our perspective concludes with a review of the existing comparative effectiveness literature, which positions JAK inhibitors, particularly upadacitinib, favorably compared with other biologic therapies. This perspective is paired with a companion publication highlighting the origins and development of JAK inhibitors and a more in-depth review of their pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Comprehensive care of ulcerative colitis: new treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon driven by aberrant immune activation. Although advanced medical therapies form the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis management, unmet needs include failure to induce and sustain remission in a substantial proportion of patients and in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis. We review new treatment strategies that might improve patient outcomes in the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, including studies published from inception to October 2024, selected for their relevance. Recognizing current limitations, this article reviews strategies to improve treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis using advanced therapies. These approaches include early treatment initiation, dose optimization, positioning newer agents as first-line therapies, combination therapy, targeting novel therapeutic endpoints, and the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

EXPERT OPINION

The strategies discussed may contribute to establishing new standards of care aimed at achieving long-term remission and enhancing patient outcomes. Personalized therapy, which tailors treatment based on individual disease characteristics and risk factors, is anticipated to become a critical aspect of delivering more effective care in the future.

Combining Advanced Targeted Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Practice and Future Directions

Background/Objectives: Despite the increasing number of available medications, a significant proportion of IBD patients fail to achieve the current therapeutic targets. Uncontrolled IBD has a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on overall costs for the healthcare system. Given the complex pathophysiology of IBD, Combined Advanced Targeted Therapy (CATT), involving the combination of biologics/small molecules, appears to have biological plausibility and is gaining increasing interest. The aim of this narrative review is to provide the current evidence regarding CATT in IBD and propose future developments in this field. Methods: Relevant literature evidence was searched with pertinent MeSH terms in the most important database. Results: Available evidence of CATT in IBD provides encouraging results in terms of efficacy and effectiveness, with an acceptable safety profile. CATT may represent a therapeutic solution for patients with "difficult-to-treat" IBD or with concomitant immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, current data are restricted by an overall low level of evidence and by the short follow-up. Conclusions: There are no data concluding the superiority of one combination therapy over another. Various therapeutic schemes could be applied in the near future. Further studies are needed to provide recommendations and integrate this therapeutic strategy into everyday clinical practice.

Tofacitinib for Hospitalized Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Management (The TRIUMPH Study)

Background

Tofacitinib is a rapidly acting Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with increasing evidence of effectiveness in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, there are scarce prospective data analyzing the efficacy and rapidity of action in hospitalized ASUC.

Methods

The TRIUMPH study is a prospective open-label interventional trial of tofacitinib in hospitalized patients with ASUC conducted in 5 hospitals across Canada (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04925973). Eligible participants included biologic-naïve and experienced patients with ASUC refractory to 3 days of intravenous (IV) corticosteroids (Modified Truelove-Witts Severity Index [MTWSI] > 10 despite steroids). Participants were treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily and assessed daily while in hospital. The primary outcome was day 7 clinical response (MTWSI reduction of > 3 from baseline and ≤ 10).

Results

Among 24 subjects, 33.3% (8/24) had previous anti-TNF failure. Day 7 clinical response was achieved in 58.3% (14/24). The mean number of days to achieve clinical response was 2.4 (SD 1.3). Marked reduction in C-reactive protein was observed in responders within the first two days after tofacitinib initiation compared to nonresponders. Colectomy occurred in 25% (6/24) by 6 months, with no additional colectomy beyond this time point. Five participants reported a total of 13 adverse events.

Conclusions

Tofacitinib is an effective rescue therapy in hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ASUC. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare JAK inhibitors with other rescue therapies, including infliximab in steroid-refractory ASUC (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04925973).

Drug-Induced Acne in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Practical Guide for the Gastroenterologist

Drug-induced acne is a common side effect to a wide array of pharmacological therapies and is characterized by a monomorphic, papulopustular eruption typically affecting the face, scalp, and the upper thorax. Corticosteroids and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are commonly used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are known to aggravate a prior tendency to acne or trigger the development of new acneiform eruptions. Recent attention on managing drug-induced acne has been driven by the increasing use of JAKi, an expanding therapeutic class in IBD and several other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Both randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have identified acne as one of the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in JAKi. Left untreated, this common skin reaction can significantly affect patient self-esteem and quality of life leading to poor treatment adherence and suboptimal IBD control. This review examines the characteristics of drug-induced acne in IBD treatments, provides a practical guide for gastroenterologists to manage mild-to-moderate occurrences, and highlights when to seek specialist dermatology advice. Such approaches enable early treatment of a common and often distressing adverse event and optimize the management of IBD by preventing the premature discontinuation or dose reduction of efficacious IBD drugs.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis: defining the precise moment for colectomy

INTRODUCTION

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a critical manifestation of ulcerative colitis (UC), often necessitating colectomy when medical management fails. Despite advancements in therapeutic interventions such as corticosteroids, biologics, and JAK inhibitors, a significant proportion of patients require surgery, with colectomy rates ranging from 10% to 15%.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the factors influencing the timing and necessity of colectomy in ASUC management, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making involving gastroenterologists and surgeons.

EXPERT OPINION

Key surgical indications include failure of medical therapy, toxic megacolon, perforation, uncontrolled bleeding, and systemic deterioration. Delays in surgery can result in higher morbidity and mortality rates, making timely intervention essential. This review highlights surgical techniques, including total colectomy and end ileostomy, and discusses potential complications, urging a balanced approach to optimize patient outcomes.

Filgotinib to Treat Acute Severe Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a serious complication affecting 9%-15% of patients with UC within 3 months of diagnosis and up to 28% of patients during the course of the disease. Despite the use of infliximab and calcineurin inhibitors, the rate of colectomy remains high both during the hospitalization and in the 5 years after an acute episode. We present a case of ASUC that was unresponsive to conventional therapies but was successfully treated with filgotinib.

Case Presentation

A 21-year-old male with a recent diagnosis of UC presented to our hospital with a severe flare. He received rescue therapy of high-dose intravenous steroids and 10 mg/kg infliximab. We observed little clinical and biochemical benefits. The patient declined the surgical option. Therefore, we decided to start a second rescue therapy with a new and rapid-acting Janus kinase inhibitor, filgotinib, due to its characteristics and pharmacokinetic profile of rapid absorption and metabolism. The patient showed an immediate clinical and biochemical response at 48 h, an endoscopic response at week 3, and an endoscopic remission at week 10. No recurrence was observed after 12 months of follow-up. The patient is in clinical remission with a good quality of life.

Conclusion

Filgotinib may be an effective second-line therapy in an emergency setting such as ASUC in patients unresponsive to conventional therapy.

Future of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis-A Narrative Review

While corticosteroids have led to significant reduction in ASUC mortality over the last few decades, they are associated with significant side effects and up to 30% of patients have steroid refractory ASUC, which means we require safer and better therapies for patients with ASUC. Several salvage therapies have been proposed in guidelines; however, we lack high quality head-to-head randomised controlled trials to assess effectiveness and safety of these agents. Furthermore, the role of newer novel agents in ASUC management is unclear. We aim to present an up to date review and envisage future treatment of ASUC without steroids based on current trials and data. In summary, we conclude that ASUC treatment still heavily relies on corticosteroids despite the side effect profile. While infliximab and cyclosporine have extensive data, there are no prospective studies comparing them with corticosteroids as initial therapy. Novel therapies open up the possibility of oral options but require prospective data before any conclusion can be made.

Recent Advances in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis is a medical emergency requiring inpatient treatment with intravenous steroids. Approximately one-third of patients do not respond to steroids sufficiently and require medical rescue therapy. Infliximab and cyclosporine are equally effective rescue agents, though infliximab is often preferred by clinicians for ease of use and greater familiarity. The use of cyclosporine is becoming more frequent, however, in patients previously exposed to infliximab. Those patients not exhibiting an adequate response to rescue therapy require colectomy. There is increasing interest in modified medical treatment to rescue the need for surgery. Janus kinase inhibitors may provide benefits when used alongside steroids from admission or as a rescue agent, but further randomised trials are needed to clearly establish their role. Intensified dosing of infliximab when used as a rescue therapy has shown mixed results but seems sensible in patients with low albumin and high disease burden. In this review, we describe the current established treatment pathways and report newer developments and evolving concepts that may in the future improve the care of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Clinical Trial Design Considerations for Hospitalised Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Flares and Application to Study Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the NIDDK HBOT-UC Consortium

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are hospitalised for acute severe flares represent a high-risk orphan population.

AIM

To provide guidance for clinical trial design methodology in these patients.

METHODS

We created a multi-centre consortium to design and conduct a clinical trial for a novel therapeutic intervention (hyperbaric oxygen therapy) in patients with UC hospitalised for moderate-severe flares. During planning, we identified and addressed specific gaps for inclusion/exclusion criteria; disease activity measures; pragmatic trial design considerations within care pathways for hospitalised patients; standardisation of care delivery; primary and secondary outcomes; and sample size and statistical analysis approaches.

RESULTS

The Truelove-Witt criteria should not be used in isolation. Endoscopy is critical for defining eligible populations. Patient-reported outcomes should include rectal bleeding and stool frequency, with secondary measurement of urgency and nocturnal bowel movements. Trial design needs to be tailored to care pathways, with early intervention focused on replacing and/or optimising responsiveness to steroids and later interventions focused on testing novel rescue agents or strategies. The PRECIS-2 framework offers a means of tailoring to local populations. We provide standardisation of baseline testing, venous thromboprophylaxis, steroid dosing, discharge criteria and post-discharge follow-up to avoid confounding by usual care variability. Statistical considerations are provided given the small clinical trial nature of this population.

CONCLUSION

We provide an outline for framework decisions made for the hyperbaric oxygen trial in patients hospitalised for UC flares. Future research should focus on the remaining gaps identified.

Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase-Inhibitors in Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Janus kinase-inhibitors (JAK-i) have recently been approved for treating patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC); therefore, further information is needed, particularly regarding efficacy and safety. Objectives: To provide a comprehensive review regarding the efficacy and safety of currently available JAK-i in UC. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus databases were considered, searching for 'JAK', 'JAK-inhibitor', 'Janus Kinases', 'Tofacitinib', 'Filgotinib', 'Upadacitinib', individually or in combination with 'IBD', 'Ulcerative Colitis', 'safety', 'efficacy', 'study' and 'trial'. The search was focused on full-text papers published in English, with no publication date restrictions. Results: The efficacy and safety of JAK-i approved for treating patients with UC have been summarized. These included Tofacitinib, Filgotinib and Upadacitinib. Findings from both clinical trials and real-life studies in UC were reported, with particular regard to their efficacy in inducing clinical response and remission, steroid-free remission and endoscopic and histological healing. Overall, JAK-i proved to be effective and safe in selected subgroups of patients with UC. The rapid onset of action and the oral route of administration represent the most relevant characteristics of these drugs. Safety concerns using Tofacitinib in subgroups of patients (infections, hypercholesterolemia, venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular events) were initially raised. More recently, all JAK-i for UC showed an overall satisfactory safety profile. However, indication should be carefully given. Conclusions: The use of JAK-i UC is promising, although no predictive markers of response are currently available. Optimizing their use, as monotherapy or combined with other immunomodulators, may increase their efficacy in appropriately selected subgroups of patients with UC.

Corticosteroids combined with infliximab vs. corticosteroids sequential infliximab for acute severe ulcerative colitis with mucosal deficiency: a retrospective study

Introduction

Mucosal deficiency is one of the most challenging conditions in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Intravenous corticosteroids (CS) are the first-line treatment, with infliximab (IFX) used as a rescue therapy. However, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory. We investigated whether CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy would improve outcomes in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center. The primary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, and endoscopic remission at week 14. The secondary outcomes included the colectomy rate within 90 days and durable clinical remission.

Results

A total of 43 patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency were included in the analysis (25 in the CS combined with the IFX group and 18 in the CS sequential IFX group). At week 14, endoscopic improvement was observed in 21 of 25 patients (84.0%) receiving the CS combined with the IFX regimen, compared to 9 of 18 (50.0%) patients receiving the CS sequential IFX regimen (p = 0.017). Durable clinical remission rates were significantly higher in the combined group than in the sequential group (85.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical and endoscopic remission at week 14 or colectomy rate within 90 days. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the CS combined with the IFX regimen was an independent predictive factor for a higher endoscopic improvement rate at week 14 (odds ratio (OR) 8.428, 95%confidence interval (CI) 1.539-46.153, p = 0.014) and a higher durable clinical remission rate (OR 10.800, 95%CI 2.095-55.666, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

CS combined with IFX as first-line therapy may be an effective induction strategy in patients with ASUC with mucosal deficiency. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are needed.

Review article: Novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease - An update for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Several new treatments including small molecules and biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in recent years. Clinicians and patients now have a wide variety of therapeutic options to choose from and these novel therapies provide several advantages including oral administration, lower immunogenicity, better selectivity and arguably better safety profiles. An increase in treatment options has increased the complexity of decision-making. Both patients and clinicians have had to become rapidly familiar with efficacy of new medications balanced against a range of pre-initiation requirements, dosing schedules and adverse event profiles.

AIMS

To provide a simple guide to practising clinicians on recently approved and emerging therapies and address key challenges around treatment strategies such as optimal sequencing and timing of treatment.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the published literature and major conference abstracts to identify phase III placebo-controlled and active comparator trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Data for recently approved therapies including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1 receptor modulators and p19 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improved patient outcomes in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Further comparative head-to-head studies have improved our understanding of when and how to optimally use newer therapies, specifically for IL-23 inhibitors. Data for emerging treatment options and novel treatment strategies such as early effective treatment, combinations of treatments and implications for sequencing are continuing to transform IBD care continually.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently approved novel therapies have expanded the range of medical options available to treat IBD. However, further data from long-term extension studies, real-world studies and head-to-head trials are warranted to better inform the long-term safety and optimal sequencing of treatments for patients living with IBD.

What to do when traditional rescue therapies fail in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies.

Understanding the Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Hospital: A Qualitative Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-treating presentation of ulcerative colitis (UC) that requires prompt initiation of treatment to avoid complication. Unfortunately, outcomes for ASUC are suboptimal, with as many as 20-30% of patients requiring colectomy. This can be challenging for patients and highlights the need to understand patient experiences and perspectives navigating ASUC.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study utilizing semi-structured interviews was conducted to understand perspectives and experiences of patients navigating ASUC. Adult patients hospitalized for ASUC between January 2017 and March 2024 were eligible. Interviews were conducted both retrospectively among patients with a recent hospitalization and prospectively among patients within 24 h of hospitalization for ASUC. Interviews were analyzed using a well-established hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (44.2% response rate) hospitalized for ASUC were interviewed. Hybrid thematic analysis uncovered five major themes: (1) the pervasive impact of UC on QoL and mental health, (2) challenges associated with navigating uncertainty, (3) prioritizing colon preservation, (4) bridging the divide between outpatient expectations and inpatient realities, and (5) balancing rapid symptom improvement with steroid safety. Our findings advocate for transparent approach to care, emphasizing the need for effective communication, education, and better alignment with patient values and expectations.

CONCLUSION

Five key themes were identified, each with significant implications for developing a more patient-centered approach to ASUC care. These themes captured meaningful insight into patient perceptions and experiences, identifying multiple areas for actionable interventions to improve care.

Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis patients from single Chinese IBD Center: a monocentric study

Upadacitinib is an oral new selective JAK1 inhibitor that has been approved for treating adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. However, a growing number of studies are needed on the effectiveness of upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis. This study was mainly aimed to describe the clinical and endoscopic effectiveness of upadacitinib 45 mg in Chinese acute severe ulcerative colitis patients following eight weeks of treatment. In this study, we examined all patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis from Xijing IBD Center, Xi'an, China, with acute severe ulcerative colitis. All patients were initially given oral upadacitinib 45 mg. Clinical indicators, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates were collected. Clinical response and clinical remission were assessed using modified Mayo. Endoscopic evaluation was performed carried out using the Mayo Endoscopic Score and Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity score. A total of 14 patients who received upadacitinib were included in the study period. All patients exhibited a clinical response to 45 mg upadacitinib initially. All patients completed the 8-week induction. The clinical remission rate was 28.6% after eight weeks. Two patients revealed endoscopic remission at 14.3%. The pathology improved in 50.0% of patients. The 8-week surgical resection rate was 7.1%, with the 16-week surgical resection rate being 14.3%. Adverse events included herpes simplex virus infection and increased thrombin time. The results of our study support the short-term effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis, providing new choices for patients' treatment. However, more extended investigation needs to be performed on the long-term effectiveness and safety.

Game changer: How Janus kinase inhibitors are reshaping the landscape of ulcerative colitis management

Recent advancements in the treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) have ushered in a new era of possibilities, particularly with the introduction of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibitors. These novel agents offer a paradigm shift in UC management by targeting key signaling pathways involved in inflammatory processes. With approved JAK inhibitors (JAKis), such as tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, clinicians now have powerful tools to modulate immune responses and gene expression, potentially revolutionizing the treatment algorithm for UC. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of JAKis in inducing and maintaining remission, presenting viable options for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Real-world data support the use of JAKis not only as first-line treatments but also in subsequent lines of therapy, particularly in patients with aggressive disease phenotypes or refractory to biologic agents. The rapid onset of action and potency of JAKis have broadened the possibilities in the management strategies of UC, offering timely relief for patients with active disease and facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite safety concerns, including cardiovascular risks and infections, ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will continue to refine our understanding of the risk-benefit profile of JAKis in UC management.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis trials: the past, the present and the future

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), characterised by bloody diarrhoea and systemic inflammation, is associated with a significant risk of colectomy and a small risk of mortality. The landmark trial of cortisone in 1955 was pivotal for two reasons: first, for establishing the efficacy of a drug that remains a first-line therapy today and, second, for producing the first set of disease severity criteria and clinical trial endpoints that shaped the subsequent ASUC trial landscape. Trials in the 1990s and at the turn of the millennium established the efficacy of infliximab and ciclosporin, but since then, there has been little progress in drug development for this high-risk population. This systematic review evaluates all interventional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients hospitalised with severe UC. It provides an overview of the efficacy of treatments from past to present and assesses the evolution of trial characteristics with respect to study populations, eligibility criteria and study designs over time. This review details ongoing RCTs in this field and provides a perspective on the challenges for future clinical trial programmes and how these can be overcome to help deliver novel ASUC therapies.

Navigating treatment resistance: Janus kinase inhibitors for ulcerative colitis

The management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and acute severe UC (ASUC) is challenging due to the lack of standardized approaches in cases resistant to multiple treatments. In this editorial, I investigate the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors, particularly upadacitinib and tofacitinib, in controlling severe and refractory disease. I highlight a notable case report by Xu et al, which explores the case of a patient with primary nonresponse to two classes of biologics and two fecal microbiota transplants who exhibited a remarkable response to upadacitinib. Furthermore, I discuss the use of tofacitinib in refractory UC and ASUC, either as monotherapy or in combination with biologics, which has shown promising response rates. Additionally, emerging evidence of upadacitinib efficacy in ASUC is presented. Overall, these cases emphasize the complex nature of managing refractory ASUC and the potential of small-molecule therapies to achieve remission. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies for patients with treatment-resistant UC.

Predicting Outcome after Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Contemporary Review and Areas for Future Research

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis relapse which requires hospitalization and intensive medical intervention to avoid colectomy. The timely recognition of patients at risk of corticosteroid failure and the early initiation of medical rescue therapy are paramount in the management of ASUC. The choice of medical rescue therapy is influenced by multiple factors, especially patient's prior treatment history. This decision should involve the patient and ideally a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, including gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and enterostomal therapists. Although several predictive models have been developed to predict corticosteroid failure in ASUC, there is no single validated tool that is universally utilized. At present, infliximab and cyclosporine are the only agents systematically evaluated and recommended for medical rescue therapy, with recent reports of off-label utilization of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in small case series. The available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these oral small molecules for ASUC is insufficient to provide definitive recommendations. Early decision-making to assess the response to medical rescue therapy is essential, and the decision to pursue surgery in the case of treatment failure should not be delayed.

Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by alternating periods of inflammation and remission. Although UC incidence is lower in Taiwan than in Western countries, its impact remains considerable, demanding updated guidelines for addressing local healthcare challenges and patient needs. The revised guidelines employ international standards and recent research, emphasizing practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system. Since the inception of the guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has acknowledged the need for ongoing revisions to incorporate emerging therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. This updated guideline aims to align UC management with local contexts, ensuring comprehensive and context-specific recommendations, thereby raising the standard of care for UC patients in Taiwan. By adapting and optimizing international protocols for local relevance, these efforts seek to enhance health outcomes for patients with UC.

Letter: Third-line therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis, exploring the uncertainty and unanswered questions

This article is linked to García et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17938 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18104.

Letter: Third-line therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis, exploring the uncertainty and unanswered questions-Authors' reply

This article is linked to García et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17938 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18056.

Editorial: Sequencing rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis-Ready for revision?

This article is linked to García et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17938 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17993

Comprehensive overview of novel chemical drugs for ulcerative colitis: focusing on phase 3 and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Despite the growing number of highly efficacious biologics and chemical drugs for ulcerative colitis (UC), steroid-free disease control is still difficult to achieve in subgroups of patients due to refractoriness, adverse events, primary or secondary failure. New treatments are therefore still required in order to optimize clinical management of patients with UC.

AREAS COVERED

The efficacy and safety of both currently available and newly developed small molecules have been summarized. The PubMed database and clinicaltrials.gov were considered in order to search for phase 2b and 3 trials on new chemical drugs for UC. The study drugs reviewed included Janus kinases (JAK) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1Pr) inhibitors, α4 integrin antagonist, and micro-RNA-124 upregulators.

EXPERT OPINION

Rapidity of onset, low immunogenicity, and safety are the main characteristics of small molecules currently available or under evaluation for treatment patients with UC. Among the currently available chemical drugs, the selective JAK and the S1Pr inhibitors are characterized by a good safety profile combined with the ability to induce clinical remission in UC. A relatively low frequency of endoscopic improvement and healing currently appears associated with their use, being higher in UC patients treated with S1Pr inhibitor Etrasimod. Overall, additional new safe and effective drugs are still required in order to optimize disease control in a larger majority of UC patients.