Metformin Is Associated With Reduced Odds for Colorectal Cancer Among Persons With Diabetes

Metformin's role in lowering colorectal cancer risk among individuals with diabetes from the Southern Community Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Metformin, utilized to manage hyperglycemia, has been linked to a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) among individuals with diabetes. However, evidence is lacking for non-Hispanic Black individuals and those with lower socioeconomic status (SES), who face elevated risk for both diabetes and CRC. In this study, we investigated the association between metformin use and incident CRC risk within the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), a racially- and SES-diverse prospective cohort.

METHODS

Participants reported their diabetes diagnosis and medications, including metformin, upon enrollment (2002-2009) and during follow-up surveys approximately every five years. Incident cases of CRC were identified through state cancer registries and the National Death Index. Proportional hazards models were employed to explore the relationship between metformin use and CRC risk, adjusted for cancer risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 25,992 participants with diabetes were included in the analysis, among whom 10,095 were taking metformin. Of these participants, 76% identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 60% reported household incomes <$15,000/year. Metformin use was associated with a significantly lower CRC risk (HR [95% CI]: 0.71 [0.55-0.93]), with consistent results for both colon (0.80 [0.59-1.07]) and rectal cancers (0.49 [0.28-0.86]). The protective association appeared to be stronger among non-Hispanic White individuals (0.51 [0.31-0.85]) compared to non-Hispanic Black participants (0.80 [0.59-1.08], p-interaction =.13). Additionally, a protective association was observed among obese individuals (BMI ≥30 kg/m2, 0.59 [0.43-0.82] but not among non-obese participants (0.99 [0.65-1.51], p-interaction =.05) CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that metformin use is associated with a reduced risk of CRC in individuals with diabetes, including among those from predominantly low SES backgrounds. These results support previous epidemiological findings, and demonstrate that the protective association for metformin in relation to incident CRC likely generalizes to populations with higher underlying risk.

Metformin Does not Affect Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy and Resection

INTRODUCTION

There is emerging evidence that metformin may have a protective effect in patients with cancer. However, its current evidence in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is inconclusive. We aim to assess the effect of metformin on long-term outcomes in patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 324 patients with nonmetastatic LARC who received neoadjuvant therapy and major surgical resection from 2004 to 2018. There were 27 patients who received metformin before surgery and 297 patients who did not receive metformin.

RESULTS

Metformin users were associated with a significantly higher age, BMI, ASA score, and 30-day readmissions (P < .05). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, P = .18) or disease-free survival (DFS, P = .33) between the two groups. On Cox regression, metformin intake did not predict OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.4-1.77) when controlled for age (HR 1.04, 1.02-1.06), sex (HR 1.13, 0.69-1.85), BMI (HR 0.97, 0.92-1.02), ASA score (HR: 1.7, 1.06-2.73), TNT (HR 0.31, 0.1-0.92), pathological Stage III disease (HR 2.55, 1.51-4.32), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (HR 3.06, 1.7-5.5), and adjuvant therapy (HR 0.1, 0.04-0.27 for <25 months OS and HR 0.3, 0.15-0.59 for ≥25 months). Disease-free survival showed a similar trend with no significant effect of metformin (HR 0.77, 0.39-1.52) when controlled for age, sex, BMI, ASA, TNT, Stage III disease, EMVI, and adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Metformin does not affect long-term survival in LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the findings further.

Metformin, Statin Use, and Female Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan

In the last few years, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in women has gradually increased. However, epidemiological studies on the relationship between type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and female CRC and the effect of metformin or statins on female CRC are insufficient. To determine their association, we conducted a population-based cohort study on women in Taiwan. We collected data on a total of 396,521 women aged 40 to 64 years old from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009 from the National Health Insurance Research Database. We followed up on all participants in the cohort until the occurrence of CRC, the date for all death, or 31 December 2015. Full development of CRC was identified using the International Classification of Disease (ICD), 9th Revision, code 153. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazards model. Both metformin (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.934–1.335, p = 0.227) and statin (aHR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.906–1.172, p = 0.645) use showed no association with female CRC in a multivariate analysis. The findings indicate that metformin and statin use showed no protective effect against female colorectal cancer (CRC). An additional randomized trial is necessary to investigate the effect of metformin and statin use in CRC prevention.

Effect of metformin use on the risk and prognosis of colorectal cancer in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether metformin is a protective factor of colorectal cancer (CRC) among CRC patients is still not entirely clear. Thus, we conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive review of associations between metformin therapy and CRC risk or survival outcomes for clinical decisions.

METHODS

Articles published before July 2021 were searched in databases (PubMed and Web of Science). Odds ratio (OR)/risk ratio (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) and their confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using STATA 12.0 software. Q test and I2 were conducted to explore heterogeneities between studies.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis showed that metformin use was associated with decreased risk and lower all-cause mortality of CRC in diabetes mellitus (DM) with random-effects models (risk: OR/RR = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.64-0.80, I2 = 89.3%, P < 0.001; all-cause mortality: HR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.62-0.83, I2 = 60.1%, P = 0.014). In addition, the study showed that metformin use was associated with a lower CRC-specific mortality in DM in cohort studies with a fixed-effects model (HR = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.70-0.92, I2 = 34.7%, P = 0.190).

CONCLUSION

Overall, in this meta-analysis, we found that metformin may be a protective factor for CRC risk and prognosis in patients with DM. Further well-designed, large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of our findings and more preclinical experiments are needed to reveal the underlying mechanism of metformin.

Medication use and risk of proximal colon cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Evidence of differences in the etiology of, and poorer survival from, proximal colon compared to the distal colorectum, necessitates research into its risk factors. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on medication use and proximal colon cancer risk.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for prospective studies investigating nine medication groups, namely non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), exogenous hormones, i.e., hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or oral contraceptives (OCs), statins, proton pump inhibitors, anti-hypertensives, metformin (an antidiabetic), antidiarrheals or laxatives, and the risk of proximal colon cancer. Narrative synthesis and meta-analyses, using random effects models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty nine publications investigating NSAIDs (n = 13), exogenous hormones [HRT (n = 9) or OCs (n = 4)] statins (n = 5), anti-hypertensives (n = 1), and metformin (n = 1) were included. Summary RRs reported a protective effect of aspirin use (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89) but no associations between HRT (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02), OC (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.98-1.14) or statin use (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67-1.31), and proximal colon cancer incidence compared to never/non-use. One study on metformin and one on anti-hypertensives reported no association. Sources of between-study heterogeneity included study design, period of exposure ascertainment, exposure source, and exposure comparison, but this exploration was hindered by the small numbers of studies.

CONCLUSION

Despite some studies on NSAID or HRT use, evidence on the impact of a range of medications on proximal colon cancer risk is limited. This highlights the need for more research to inform chemoprevention strategies.

Is Metformin Associated With Improved Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

Efforts to determine whether metformin can increase the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer have increased in recent years. However, retrospective studies have yielded inconclusive results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes and survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer taking metformin versus in those not taking metformin.

METHODS

This study analyzed 423 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery between January 2010 and May 2020; of these, 59 were taking metformin and 364 were not taking metformin.

RESULTS

Patients taking metformin had a lower proportion of tumor regression (6.8% versus 22.0%, P = 0.012) as well as a lower proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response (6.8% versus 20.6%, P = 0.011). In the multivariate analysis, independent predictors of pathologic complete response were not taking metformin (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 1.12-24.85, P= 0.035) and cT2 stage (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.10-11.07, P= 0.034); the interval was also an independent predictor of tumor regression (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.06-2.96, P= 0.028). No differences were observed in survival between groups.

CONCLUSION

Metformin was not associated with better tumor responses or survival after neoadjuvant treatment.

Resectable Colorectal Cancer: Current Perceptions on the Correlation of Recurrence Risk, Microbiota and Detection of Genetic Mutations in Liquid Biopsies

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a highly lethal malignancy, although considerable progress has resulted from molecular alterations in guiding optimal use of available treatments. CRC recurrence remains a great barrier in the disease management. Hence, the spotlight turns to newly mapped fields concerning recurrence risk factors in patients with resectable CRC with a focus on genetic mutations, microbiota remodeling and liquid biopsies. There is an urgent need for novel biomarkers to address disease recurrence since specific genetic signatures can identify a higher or lower recurrence risk (RR) and, thus, be used both as biomarkers and treatment targets. To a large extent, CRC is mediated by the immune and inflammatory interplay of microbiota, through intestinal dysbiosis. Clarification of these mechanisms will yield new opportunities, leading not only to the appropriate stratification policies, but also to more precise, personalized monitoring and treatment navigation. Under this perspective, early detection of post-operative CRC recurrence is of utmost importance. Ongoing trials, focusing on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and, even more, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), seem to pave the way to a promising, minimally invasive but accurate and life-saving monitoring, not only supporting personalized treatment but favoring patients' quality of life, as well.

Narrative review of the influence of diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia on colorectal cancer risk and oncological outcomes

•

Diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia significantly affect the incidence and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

•

Evidence of the effects of metformin remain controversial in cancer prognosis.

•

Potential molecular mechanisms by which DM and hyperglycemia affects cancer risk.

•

Potential roles of glucose modulation in CRC therapy.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperglycemia have been shown to have significant effects on the incidence, chemoresistance, and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as the outcomes of localized and metastatic CRC. Inflammation and endocrine effects may act as central mechanisms of DM and cancer and stimulate the insulin‐like growth factor 1–phosphoinositide 3-kinase–Akt–mammalian target of rapamycin (IGF-1–PI3K–AKT–mTOR) pathway. Dysregulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway leads to metabolic imbalance and indicates cancer risk. The use of metformin for chemoprevention has been shown to reduce CRC and adenoma incidence through the upregulation of AMPK, which causes cell cycle arrest in the Gap 1–S (G1–S) phase and inhibits the mTOR pathway, even potentially reversing the epithelial–mesenchymal transition. However, evidence of the effects of metformin remain controversial in cancer prognosis. Several genes, such as transcription factor 7-like 2(TCF7L2), tumor protein P53 inducible nuclear protein 1(TP53INP1), gremlin 1 (GREM1), and potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1(KCNQ1), are pleiotropically related to DM as well as cancer risk and prognosis. Epigenetic modification of members of the Let-7 family such as miR-497, miR-486, and miR-223 is strongly associated with impaired glucose tolerance and CRC risk. Herein we review the pathophysiological and epidemiological evidence as well as potential underlying molecular mechanisms by which DM and hyperglycemia affect CRC risk. We also suggest potential roles of glucose modulation in CRC therapy and propose an agenda for future research and clinical practice.

Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History

While there are various kinds of drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus at present, in this review article, we focus on metformin which is an insulin sensitizer and is often used as a first-choice drug worldwide. Metformin mainly activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the liver which leads to suppression of fatty acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis. Metformin activates AMPK in skeletal muscle as well, which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. Further, metformin suppresses glucagon signaling in the liver by suppressing adenylate cyclase which leads to suppression of gluconeogenesis. In addition, metformin reduces autophagy failure observed in pancreatic β-cells under diabetic conditions. Furthermore, it is known that metformin alters the gut microbiome and facilitates the transport of glucose from the circulation into excrement. It is also known that metformin reduces food intake and lowers body weight by increasing circulating levels of the peptide hormone growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). Furthermore, much attention has been drawn to the fact that the frequency of various cancers is lower in subjects taking metformin. Metformin suppresses the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells, which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. It has been shown recently that metformin consumption potentially influences the mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19). Taken together, metformin is an old drug, but multifaceted mechanisms of action of metformin have been unraveled one after another in its long history.

Role of gut microbiome in regulating the effectiveness of metformin in reducing colorectal cancer in type 2 diabetes

The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally. It is rarely noticed that the incidence of CRC is higher in patients with T2DM. What needs to be mentioned is that metformin, a commonly used clinical drug for T2DM, attracts scholars’ attention because of its benefits in lowering the risk of developing CRC. Hence, we try to find the common grounds of initiation of T2DM and CRC and the reason why metformin reduces the risk of CRC in patients with T2DM. We noticed consistent changes of gut microbiota, such as elevated Bacteroides, Prevotella and Bifidobacterium and depressed Firmicutes and Lactobacillus. Furthermore, many studies in recent years have proved that the efficacy of metformin, such as improving blood glucose, depends on the gut microbiota. Coincidentally, the progression of CRC is inseparable from the contributions of gut microbiota. Therefore, we first proposed the concept of the metformin-gut microbiota–CRC (in T2DM) axis to explain the effect of metformin in reducing CRC in patients with T2DM. In this review, we elaborated the new concept and its potential clinical application value.

Metformin use and the Risk of Gastrointestinal Malignancies in Diabetic Populations: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Metformin use has been associated with a decreased risk of cancer and improvement in overall cancer survival rates. However, scant data available regarding metformin's role in the risk of Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies in patients with type II diabetes. Our study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the association of metformin use and GI cancer risk.

METHODS

We conducted electronic search by two independent investigators using the PubMed and Cochrane library databases. Studies were assessed for design and quality, and a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of metformin on the odds of developing specific GI malignancies. The final papers that met our prespecified inclusion criteria included 4 case-control studies that address metformin's effect on pancreatic cancer, and 4 case-control studies that address metformin's effect on colorectal cancer in patients with type II DM.

RESULTS

Of 2258 articles screened, 8 eligible studies were identified comprising 483,561 participants diagnosed with DM. Our analysis showed that metformin use was not associated with a significant effect on the odds of developing pancreatic cancer (OR .98; 95% CI 0.82-1.17, P=0. 83). Metformin use was associated with significantly lower odds of having Colorectal Cancer (CRC); (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.81-0.87, p < 0.01). Sufficient data were not available to conduct analyses on the impact of metformin dose and duration.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that metformin could be a useful neoadjuvant agent for CRC cancer and as a possible preventive therapy for other inflammatory conditions related to colorectal pathologies such as adenomatous polyps and inflammatory bowel disease. Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of metformin on the risk of developing pancreatic cancer, given the complex nature of the organ's regulation on insulin production.

Metformin and colorectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

PURPOSE

Metformin may have a role in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and improving survival outcome. This meta-analysis explored the effect of metformin use on colorectal adenoma and cancer incidence, and colorectal oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A database search was conducted on Medline, Embase and CNKI for studies comparing metformin vs. non-metformin users, metformin users vs. non-diabetics and metformin users vs. diabetics with diet-only treatment. Meta-analysis was done with DerSimonian and Laird with risk ratios (RR), and hazard ratios (HR) for survival outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 58 studies and summarized incidences of colorectal adenoma and cancer, as well as cancer survival outcomes. Metformin users had a significant lower incidence of colorectal adenoma (RR 0.77, CI 0.67-0.88, p < 0.001), advanced adenoma (0.61, CI 0.42-0.88, p = 0.008) and CRC (RR 0.76, CI 0.69-0.84, p < 0.001) respectively compared with non-metformin users. Overall survival (HR 0.6, CI 0.53-0.67, p < 0.001) and CRC-specific survival (HR 0.66, CI 0.59-0.74, p < 0.001) were higher among metformin users compared with non-metformin users. Further analysis on overall survival of metastatic CRC patients revealed significantly higher survival rates in metformin users (HR 0.77, CI 0.68-0.87, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that metformin use significantly reduces colorectal adenoma and cancer incidence and improves colorectal cancer outcomes.

Metformin reduces HGF-induced resistance to alectinib via the inhibition of Gab1

Alectinib is a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that has sufficient clinical efficacy and satisfactory safety in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with or without brain metastasis. Alectinib has now become an important drug in the first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC; however, resistance is almost inevitable. The increased expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its physiological receptor tyrosine kinase MET have been shown to be linked to acquired resistance to various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and this phenomenon has been observed in some ALK-positive NSCLC tumour tissues. In this study, we found that HGF levels in the culture supernatant of an ALK-positive cell line tended to increase with time and could be further increased by alectinib in a time-dependent manner. Exogenous or endogenous HGF did not cause resistance to the ALK/MET double-targeted small molecule inhibitor crizotinib, but it was an important cause of alectinib resistance. Furthermore, Gab1 was a key effector in the HGF/MET signal transduction pathway that mediated alectinib resistance. The antidiabetic drug metformin combined with alectinib overcame alectinib resistance triggered by HGF/MET through disrupting the complex between MET and Gab1, thereby inhibiting Gab1 phosphorylation and the activation of downstream signal transduction pathways. These results suggest that metformin combined with alectinib may be useful for overcoming alectinib resistance induced by the activation of the HGF/MET signalling pathway and improving the efficacy of alectinib.