Molecular characterization and clinical utility of circulating tumor cells in the treatment of prostate cancer

The ternary complex factor protein ELK1 is an independent prognosticator of disease recurrence in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Both hormone-sensitive and castration- and enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancers (PCa) depend on the ternary complex factor (TCF) protein ELK1 to serve as a tethering protein for the androgen receptor (AR) to activate a critical set of growth genes. The two sites in ELK1 required for AR binding are conserved in other members of the TCF subfamily, ELK3 and ELK4. Here we examine the potential utility of the three proteins as prognosticators of disease recurrence in PCa.

METHODS

Transcriptional activity assays; Retrospective analysis of PCa recurrence using data on 501 patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database; Unpaired Wilcoxon rank-sum test and multiple comparison correction using the Holm's method; Spearman's correlations; Kaplan-Meier methods; Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses; LASSO-based penalized Cox regression models; Time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

ELK4 but not ELK3 was coactivated by AR similar to ELK1. Tumor expression of neither ELK3 nor ELK4 was associated with disease-free survival (DFS). ELK1 was associated with higher clinical T-stage, pathology T-stage, Gleason score, prognostic grade, and positive lymph node status. ELK1 was a negative prognosticator of DFS, independent of ELK3, ELK4, clinical T-stage, pathology T-stage, prognostic grade, lymph node status, age, and race. Inclusion of ELK1 increased the abilities of the Oncotype DX and Prolaris gene panels to predict disease recurrence, correctly predicting disease recurrence in a unique subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ELK1 is a strong, independent prognosticator of disease recurrence in PCa, underscoring its unique role in PCa growth. Inclusion of ELK1 may enhance the utility of currently used prognosticators for clinical decision making in prostate cancer.

Circulating tumor DNA in advanced prostate cancer: transitioning from discovery to a clinically implemented test

The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) differs from that of the primary tumor and is dynamic during tumor progression. The real-time and repeated characterization of this process via conventional solid tumor biopsies is challenging. Alternatively, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) containing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be obtained from patient plasma using minimally disruptive blood draws and is amenable to sequential analysis. ctDNA has high overlap with the genomic sequences of biopsies from metastases and has the advantage of being representative of multiple metastases. The availability of techniques with high sensitivity and specificity, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR, has greatly contributed to the development of the cfDNA field and enabled the detection of genomic alterations at low ctDNA fractions. In mCRPC, a number of clinically relevant genomic alterations have been tracked in ctDNA, including androgen receptor (AR) aberrations, which have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome to novel antiandrogen therapies, and alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, which have been associated with a response to PARP inhibitors. Several clinical applications have been proposed for cfDNA analysis, including its use as a prognostic tool, as a predictive biomarker, to monitor tumor response and to identify novel mechanisms of resistance. To date, the cfDNA analysis has provided interesting results, but there is an urgent need for these findings to be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

New biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of localized prostate cancer

The diagnostics and management of localized prostate cancer is complicated because of cancer heterogeneity and differentiated progression in various subgroups of patients. As a prostate cancer biomarker, FDA-approved detection assay for serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and its derivatives are not potent enough to diagnose prostate cancer, especially high-grade disease (Gleason ≥7). To date, a collection of new biomarkers was developed. Some of these markers are superior for primary screening while others are particularly helpful for cancer risk stratification, detection of high-grade cancer, and prediction of adverse events. Two of those markers such as proPSA (a part of the Prostate Health Index (PHI)) and prostate specific antigen 3 (PCA3) (a part of the PCA3 Progensa test) were recently approved by FDA for clinical use. Other markers are not PDA-approved yet but are available from Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA)-certified clinical laboratories. In this review, we characterize diagnostic performance of these markers and their diagnostic and prognostic utility for prostate cancer.

Succinct workflows for circulating tumor cells after enrichment: From systematic counting to mutational profiling

Purpose

This study aims to establish a highly adaptable workflow downstream of microfluidic enrichment for facilitating systematic CTC enumeration and genetic discovery.

Methods

To facilitate CTC enumeration, we established a CK/EPCAM-combined immunostaining strategy and an automated CTC analytical pipeline using an open-source image analyzer. By virtue of this workflow, we conducted a pilot study of 56 cancer patients and 21 healthy individuals using a high-throughput spiral microfluidic chip system. To facilitate genetic discovery of somatic mutations in CTCs, we integrated the CTC enumeration into next-generation sequencing and established a straightforward amplicon library comprising diversifier random sequences to sequence CTC samples.

Results

The CTC staining and enumeration workflow achieved 80.4% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity (AUC = 0.87, p = 0.004, power = 0.985), as evaluated by ROC analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis verified that the CTC (CK/EpCAM⁺CD45⁻), but not other cell populations, is a significant and independent biomarker for cancer patients (p < 0.01). Serial CTC monitoring of the patients revealed reduction in CTC numbers after treatments, suggesting its clinical utility in pharmacodynamic studies. Deep sequencing of CTC samples revealed somatic mutations in TP53 and ESR1.

Conclusions

The significance of this report is to demonstrate a systematic and adaptable workflow to bridge the gap between the microfluidic enrichment and CTC analyses, which fosters broader applications of CTCs in both clinical settings and academic studies.

The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common form of cancer in men worldwide. Biomarkers have emerged as essential tools for treatment and assessment since the variability of disease behavior, the cost and diversity of treatments, and the related impairment of quality of life have given rise to a need for a personalized approach. High-throughput technology platforms in proteomics and genomics have accelerated the development of biomarkers. Furthermore, recent successes of several new agents in PC, including immunotherapy, have stimulated the search for predictors of response and resistance and have improved the understanding of the biological mechanisms at work. This review provides an overview of currently established biomarkers in PC, as well as a selection of the most promising biomarkers within these particular fields of development.

Do circulating tumor cells have a role in deciding on adjuvant chemotherapy after radical cystectomy?

Radical cystectomy (RC) with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without perioperative chemotherapy is the golden standard treatment in muscle invasive and recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Despite treatment with curative intent, up to 50% of patients develop metastasis and die from UCB due to micro-metastatic disease undetectable for current staging techniques prior to definitive therapy. Tumor cell dissemination is a crucial step in the natural history of the metastatic cascade. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are malignant epithelial cells detectable in the peripheral blood of patients with various malignancies. In UCB, CTC are detectable in a significant number of patients prior to RC and associated with inferior outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current literature regarding CTC in UCB, discussing their potential on clinical decision-making regarding multimodal treatment and implications on the application of novel targeted therapies in the future. There is reliable evidence that presence of CTC in clinically non-metastatic UCB patients treated with RC are a powerful predictor for unfavorable outcomes and may be useful for adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making and monitoring. However, currently, the evidence is limited, and thus, integration of CTC in future UCB clinical trials is strongly recommended to shed more light on the potential of this promising biomarker.

The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology

KEY POINTS

Several aspects of phase I trials have evolved in the current era of molecular targeted agents to adapt to the changing nature of anticancer therapy and to increase the efficiency of drug development.

Current phase I designs are increasingly integrating novel dose-escalation approaches and biomarker-driven selection of patients, as well as expanding study objectives to include the evaluation of efficacy and pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics in addition to safety.

Changes to the regulatory approval process have helped to expedite drug development, particularly for novel agents with a strong biologic rationale and proof of concept, validated predictive biomarker, and clear evidence of efficacy in early trials.

As a result of the substantial changes in phase I trial goals and conduct, there is a parallel shift toward multi-institutional trials and central study management by clinical research organizations.

The use of multi-institutional trials has a significant impact on the structure of phase I programs and the experience of investigators, particularly because of limited patient enrollment at each site.

Circulating Tumor Cells: Who is the Killer?

This article is a critical note on the subject of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC). It takes into account the tumor identity of Circulating Tumor Cells as cancer seeds in transit from primary to secondary soils, rather than as a “biomarker”, and considers the help this field could bring to cancer patients. It is not meant to duplicate information already available in a large number of reviews, but to stimulate considerations, further studies and development helping the clinical use of tumor cells isolated from blood as a modern personalized, non-invasive, predictive test to improve cancer patients’ life. The analysis of CTC challenges, methodological bias and critical issues points out to the need of referring to tumor cells extracted from blood without any bias and identified by cytopathological diagnosis as Circulating Cancer Cells (CCC). Finally, this article highlights recent developments and identifies burning questions which should be addressed to improve our understanding of the domain of CCC and their potential to change the clinical practice.