1
|
Sharaf SE, Alsanosi S, Alzahrani AR, Al-Ghamdi SS, Sharaf SE, Ayoub N. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Bee Venom Acupuncture Therapy on Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Patients in Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:1171-1183. [PMID: 35153508 PMCID: PMC8827632 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s351315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Bee venom acupuncture therapy (BVT) is an alternative therapy used worldwide by patients with different chronic diseases due to its therapeutic effects on conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous studies have illustrated the clinical effects of BVT on RA, but such a study has yet to be performed in Saudi Arabia (SA). It is important to evaluate BVT awareness among citizens of SA to measure the feasibility of conducting clinical trials of BVT in patients with RA in SA. This study aims to measure the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of BVT on RA and other chronic diseases in SA. This will help determine whether patients with RA have sufficient knowledge to be enrolled in clinical trials. Patients and Methods A cross-sectional study of 180 patients with RA in SA was conducted using a KAP questionnaire on BVT. Individuals completed an online questionnaire using the Survey Monkey website. Data were obtained by self-completion of the online KAP questionnaire regarding BVT. Results A total of 180 patients with RA and other chronic diseases, with a mean age of 45 years (18–70 years), participated in the study. The results of the questionnaire showed that 55% of the participants demonstrated a good knowledge of BVT treatment; however, they also reported a poor attitude (55%) and practice (55%). Participants with RA demonstrated higher severity of disease (80%) than those with other chronic diseases. Participants with RA showed better KAP responses towards BVT than those with other chronic diseases. Participants with school education only and those who were beekeepers demonstrated significantly better KAP responses (P < 0.05) compared to participants who had received university education and those who were not beekeepers, respectively. Conclusion Participants with strong RA knowledge may prove that patients from SA can be enrolled in BVT clinical trials. The participants’ poor attitudes and practices may be due to BVT being expensive and unavailable in many cities in SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahd E Sharaf
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Toxicology Society, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Safaa Alsanosi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah R Alzahrani
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Toxicology Society, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed S Al-Ghamdi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Toxicology Society, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sharaf E Sharaf
- Saudi Toxicology Society, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Clinical Research Administration, Executive Administration of Research and Innovation, King Abdullah Medical City in the Holy Capital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: Sharaf E Sharaf, Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966532660411, Email
| | - Nahla Ayoub
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Toxicology Society, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macpherson K, Aiyegbusi OL, Elston L, Myles S, Washington J, Sungum N, Briggs M, Newsome P, Calvert M. A scoping review of patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies. Regen Med 2021; 16:1005-1017. [PMID: 34553606 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The development and introduction of cell and gene therapies presents complex social and economic issues. Fully addressing these challenges requires engagement with patients and the public. Materials & methods: A systematically conducted scoping review was undertaken to gauge current patient and public knowledge and perspectives, and as such inform requirements for future research, education and engagement activities. Results: A heterogeneous collection of 35 studies were identified. Levels of knowledge among patients and the public were extremely variable. Studies indicated general acceptance of therapies. Conclusion: The review identified the need for tailored educational activities, and in particular the importance of addressing misconceptions. There is also a need for robust qualitative research considering perspectives on current and forthcoming licensed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Susan Myles
- Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, CF10 4PL, UK
| | | | - Nisha Sungum
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Mark Briggs
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Nantgarw, Cardiff, CF15 7QZ, UK
| | - Philip Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction & Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Macpherson K, Elston L, Myles S, Washington J, Sungum N, Briggs M, Newsome PN, Calvert MJ. Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6265. [PMID: 33293538 PMCID: PMC7722871 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell and gene therapies offer opportunities for treating disease with potential to restore function, and cure disease. However, they are not without risk and pose complex logistical, economic, ethical and social challenges for health systems. Here we report our systematic review of the current evidence on patient and public knowledge and perspectives of cell and gene therapies, to inform future research, education and awareness raising activities. We screened 10,735 titles and abstracts, and evaluated the full texts of 151 publications. The final selection was 35 publications. Four themes were generated from the narrative synthesis of the study findings namely: (1) Knowledge and understanding of cell and gene therapies, (2) Acceptance of cell and gene therapies (3) Understanding of risk and benefits of therapy, and (4) Information needs and current sources of information. As potential funders or future recipients, it is important that the public and patients are aware of these therapies, understand the issues involved, and can contribute to the debate. This review highlights the need for appropriate patient and public education on the various aspects of cell and gene therapies. High quality studies exploring patient and public opinions and experiences of cell and gene therapy are required. Patient and public perceptions of these therapies, alongside evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness, will be central to their uptake and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Nisha Sungum
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands-Wales Advanced Therapy Treatment Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Briggs
- Welsh Blood Service, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philip N Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kane PB, Benjamin DM, Barker RA, Lang AE, Sherer T, Kimmelman J. Comparison of Patient and Expert Perceptions of the Attainment of Research Milestones in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2020; 36:171-177. [PMID: 33002259 PMCID: PMC7891331 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Commentators suggest that patients have unrealistic expectations about the pace of research advances and that such expectations interfere with patient decision‐making. Objective The objective of this study was to compare expert expectations about the timing of research milestone attainment with those of patients who follow Parkinson's disease (PD) research. Methods Patients with PD and experts were asked to provide forecasts about 11 milestones in PD research in an online survey. PD experts were identified from a Michael J. Fox Foundation database, highly ranked neurology centers in the United States and Canada, and corresponding authors of articles on PD in top medical journals. Patients with PD were recruited through the Michael J. Fox Foundation. We tested whether patient forecasts differed on average from expert forecasts. We also tested whether differences between patient forecasts and the average expert forecasts were associated with any demographic factors. Results A total of 256 patients and 249 PD experts completed the survey. For 9 of the 11 milestones, patients' forecasts were on average higher than those of experts. Only exercise therapy met our 10% difference threshold for practical significance. Education was the only demographic that predicted patient deviations from expert forecasts on milestone forecasts. Patients offered significantly higher forecasts than experts that the clinical trials used in milestone queries would report positive primary outcomes. Conclusions Differences between patient and expert expectations about research milestones were generally minor, suggesting that there is little cause for concern that patients who follow PD research are unduly swayed by inaccurate representations of research advancement in the media or elsewhere. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Bodilly Kane
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM) Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel M Benjamin
- Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA
| | - Roger A Barker
- John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council (WT/MRC) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony E Lang
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and the Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd Sherer
- The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Kimmelman
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM) Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin TY, Hsieh CL. Clinical Applications of Bee Venom Acupoint Injection. Toxins (Basel) 2020; 12:toxins12100618. [PMID: 32992601 PMCID: PMC7601520 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12100618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Bee venom is a complex natural mixture with various pharmaceutical properties. Among these properties, its peptides and enzymes have potential medical therapy for pain relief and inflammation. In clinical settings, this therapy has been used widely to treat diseases by injecting into acupoints. In this article, we have conducted various research from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Key from inception of July 2020. The results revealed that bee venom therapy has been reported effective in anti-inflammatory, antiapoptosis, and analgesic effects. Moreover, bee venom acupuncture has been commonly used for clinical disorders such as Parkinson disease, neuropathic pain, Alzheimer disease, intervertebral disc disease, spinal cord injury, musculoskeletal pain, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, skin disease and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Yen Lin
- Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan;
| | - Ching-Liang Hsieh
- Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2205-3366-3128
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aked J, Delavaran H, Lindvall O, Norrving B, Kokaia Z, Lindgren A. Attitudes to Stem Cell Therapy Among Ischemic Stroke Survivors in the Lund Stroke Recovery Study. Stem Cells Dev 2017; 26:566-572. [PMID: 28142330 DOI: 10.1089/scd.2016.0343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Preclinical studies suggest that stem cell therapy (SCT) may improve poststroke recovery, and clinical trials investigating safety are ongoing. However, knowledge about patients' attitudes to SCT in stroke is limited. We evaluated the knowledge and attitudes to this therapeutic approach as well as possible factors influencing this among stroke patients potentially suitable for SCT. Consecutive first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients aged 20-75 years with NIH stroke scale scores 1-18 were included. Exclusion criteria were severe comorbidities or infratentorial stroke. Clinical follow-up after 3-5 years assessed severity of residual stroke symptoms, cognitive function, functional status, patient-reported outcome, and comorbidity, and after receiving standardized information, the participants also completed an eight-item questionnaire on knowledge and attitudes about SCT. The relationships between clinical variables and positive attitude to SCT were assessed with logistic regression analyses. Of 108 patients included at baseline, 84 participated at follow-up and completed the questionnaire. In total, 12% had prior knowledge of SCT. When informed, 63% were positive toward it and 36% reported willingness to participate in SCT trials. Only 5%-8% expressed ethical considerations regarding different stem cell sources. Positive attitudes to SCT were associated with male gender (OR: 3.74; 95% CI: 1.45-9.61; P < 0.01) and better patient-reported outcome (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04; P < 0.05). In conclusion, stroke patients had limited prior knowledge of SCT, yet attitudes were positive among the majority after receiving standardized and neutral information. Gender and degree of stroke recovery may influence attitudes to SCT, indicating a need for targeted information to improve knowledge about SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Aked
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,2 Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden
| | - Hossein Delavaran
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,2 Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden
| | - Olle Lindvall
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,2 Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden .,3 Laboratory of Stem Cells and Restorative Neurology, Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University , Lund, Sweden
| | - Bo Norrving
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,2 Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden
| | - Zaal Kokaia
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,3 Laboratory of Stem Cells and Restorative Neurology, Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University , Lund, Sweden
| | - Arne Lindgren
- 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University , Lund, Sweden .,2 Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital , Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jitkritsadakul O, Boonrod N, Bhidayasiri R. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional survey of Asian patients. J Neurol Sci 2016; 374:69-74. [PMID: 28104234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.12.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A knowledge gap about Parkinson's disease (PD) often exists amongst PD patients, the level and accuracy of which can influence their attitude and perceptions about the disease. Increased awareness of this information deficit can help physicians identify interventions that will improve patient's knowledge and perceptions about PD. OBJECTIVES To evaluate general understanding of PD and identify knowledge gaps amongst PD patients using a validated PD knowledge questionnaire. METHODS A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted in 108 PD patients (34 working; 74 retired). The questionnaire covers three domains of PD, including diagnosis, therapeutic options, and disease course with a total knowledge score ranging from 0 to 26. Subjects with dementia were excluded. RESULTS Patient misconceptions were reflected in the mean (SD) total, diagnosis, therapeutic options, and disease course scores: 14.64 (3.32), 7.76 (1.93), 3.85 (1.28), and 3.03 (1.41) respectively. The working age subgroup had significantly higher knowledge scores than the retired age group for the whole questionnaire (p=0.004), as well as the diagnosis (p=0.001) and therapeutic sections (p=0.023). Three dependent variables, including younger age at recruitment (<60years old), female gender, and higher disease duration (≥4years), were identified as predictors of a higher level of PD knowledge amongst PD patients. CONCLUSION Significant knowledge gaps were identified amongst PD patients in all three aspects of the questionnaire. Timely identification of patients with inaccurate or insufficient disease-related knowledge could help healthcare professionals choose more suitable multimodal educational interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onanong Jitkritsadakul
- Chulalongkorn Center of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Nonglak Boonrod
- Chulalongkorn Center of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Roongroj Bhidayasiri
- Chulalongkorn Center of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim HJ, Jeon B, Chung SJ. Professional ethics in complementary and alternative medicines in management of Parkinson's disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2016; 6:675-683. [PMID: 27589539 PMCID: PMC5088405 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-160890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The practice of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is not, at present, considered an integral part of conventional medicine. As the popularity of CAM grows and access to information about CAM increases through the media and internet where CAMs are often promoted, patients are at risk of exposure unvalidated information. Therefore, there is a need for physicians to examine objectively the efficacy and safety of CAM, compare it with current medications, and become actively involved in the CAM treatment with patients. In accordance with these needs, this manuscript reviews the utility, scientific evidence, safety and cost-effectiveness of CAM in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). We also address the ethical issues of CAM practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Jin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Parkinson Disease Study Group, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Beomseok Jeon
- Parkinson Disease Study Group, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Neurology and Movement Disorder Center, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sun Ju Chung
- Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|