The burden of second hip fractures: provincial surgical hospitalizations over 15 years

Outcomes and Risks Associated With Subsequent Contralateral Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures constitute a major public health problem for older individuals. They are associated with functional deterioration, limited mobility, and increased mortality, while contributing to economic and social hardships that are compounded by a second hip fracture. With the aging US population and increasing rates of hip fractures, it is essential to understand factors surrounding subsequent contralateral hip fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive study was a retrospective review of patients 60 years and older who were identified in the institutional geriatric hip fracture database as having had an initial and subsequent contra-lateral hip fracture, with the second treated at our tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

The incidence of subsequent hip fracture was 13.2%. The mean time to second hip fracture was 3.5 years after the initial injury. The first fracture tended to be a femoral neck fracture, whereas the second injury was more likely to have an intertrochanteric pattern. There was a higher complication rate after a subsequent hip fracture. Patients taking osteoporosis and adjuvant medication prior to admission for the second fracture tended to have a lower 90-day mortality rate. Patients with a history of any fracture prior to the first hip fracture, with cancer, and with osteopenia had shorter intervals to the subsequent event.

CONCLUSION

Subsequent hip fractures carry high morbidity and mortality rates. Steps should be taken after the initial injury to optimize outcomes in the case of a subsequent event. Patients discharged after initial hip fracture should be maintained with osteoporosis medication. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

The efficacy of femoral augmentation for hip fracture prevention using ceramic-based cements: A preliminary experimentally-driven finite element investigation

Femoral fractures due to sideways falls continue to be a major cause of concern for the elderly. Existing approaches for the prevention of these injuries have limited efficacy. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems, particularly those involving the injection of ceramic-based bone cements, are gaining more attention as a potential alternative preventative approach. We evaluated the mechanical effectiveness of three variations of a bone cement injection pattern (basic ellipsoid, hollow ellipsoid, small ellipsoid) utilizing finite element simulations of sideways fall impacts. The basic augmentation pattern was tested with both high- and low-strength ceramic-based cements. The cement patterns were added to the finite element models (FEMs) of five cadaveric femurs, which were then subject to simulated sideways falls at seven impact velocities ranging from 1.0 m/s to 4.0 m/s. Peak impact forces and peak acetabular forces were examined, and failure was evaluated using a strain-based criterion. We found that the basic HA ellipsoid provided the highest increases in both the force at the acetabulum of the impacted femur ("acetabular force", 55.0% ± 22.0%) and at the force plate ("impact force", 37.4% ± 15.8%). Changing the cement to a weaker material, brushite, resulted in reduced strengthening of the femur (45.2% ± 19.4% acetabular and 30.4% ± 13.0% impact). Using a hollow version of the ellipsoid appeared to have no effect on the fracture outcome and only a minor effect on the other metrics (54.1% ± 22.3% acetabular force increase and 35.3% ± 16.0% impact force increase). However, when the outer two layers of the ellipsoid were removed (small ellipsoid), the force increases that were achieved were only 9.8% ± 5.5% acetabular force and 8.2% ± 4.1% impact force. These results demonstrate the importance of supporting the femoral neck cortex to prevent femoral fractures in a sideways fall, and provide plausible options for prophylactic femoral augmentation. As this is a preliminary study, the surgical technique, the possible effects of trabecular bone damage during the augmentation process, and the effect on the blood supply to the femoral head must be assessed further.

Morbidity and Mortality After Second Hip Fracture With and Without Nursing Care Program

Background

Hip fractures are an increasingly common injury among older people who usually experience significantly worse mobility, independence in function, health, quality of life, and high rates of institutionalization. Studies have shown that only 40-60% of participants recover their pre-fracture level of mobility and ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living, while for those who are independent in self-care prior to the fracture, 20-60% still require assistance for various tasks one or two years after the fracture. As the cumulative incidence of a second hip fracture has been estimated to reach 8.4%, prevention of the second hip fracture is a major concern of the health system and the society focused mainly on lifestyle modifications, osteoporotic treatment, and fall-prevention strategies. The aim of the present study was to compare morbidity/mortality, functional results, and type of recovery between the first and second hip fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

Patients with a contralateral hip fracture were prospectively recruited during a three-year period (2016-2019). Level of independence, gait aids, type of rehabilitation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scale were evaluated at admission for the second fracture and at the last reexamination.

Results

Twenty-seven out of 33 patients, aged 87.93±6.6, underwent surgery for contralateral hip fracture and followed up for 42.52±16.46 months; the mean interval between the two fractures was 39.63 months. The HHS averaged 86.19±12.18 and 59.01±32.83 and the WOMAC 86.37±12.09 and 68.22±26.18 before and after the second fracture, respectively. The mortality rate was 37.03%, 14.8±12.93 months after the second operation, with a significant relationship between the mortality time and the interval between fractures (p=0.028). Twelve and 14 of the patients received geriatric nursing care after the first and second fracture, respectively, without significant improvement in their functional results compared to home care. Mobility of nursing care patients after the second fracture was significantly improved (p=0.019).

Conclusions

Mortality is higher in the second year after the second hip fracture and strongly correlated with the time interval between fractures. A higher possibility to return in previous mobility status occurs after geriatric nursing care. 

Prophylactic augmentation implants in the proximal femur for hip fracture prevention: An in silico investigation of simulated sideways fall impacts

Femoral fractures from sideways falls in the elderly are associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Approaches to prevent these catastrophic injuries include pharmacological treatments, which have limited efficacy. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems are a promising alternative that are gaining prominence by addressing the most debilitating osteoporosis-related fracture. We have developed finite element models (FEMs) of a novel experimental sideways fall simulator for cadavers. By virtue of the range of specimens and injury outcomes, these FEMs are well-suited to the evaluation of such implants. The purpose of this study was to use the FEMs to evaluate the mechanical effectiveness of three different prophylactic femoral augmentation systems. Models of the Y-Strut® (Hyprevention®, Pessac, France), Gamma Nail® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA), and a simple lag screw femoral fracture implant systems were placed into FEMs of five cadaveric pelvis-femur constructs embedded in a soft tissue surrogate, which were then subject to simulated sideways falls at seven impact velocities. Femur-only FEMs were also evaluated. Peak impact forces and peak acetabular forces were examined, and failure was evaluated using a strain-based criterion. We found that the femoral augmentation systems increased the peak forces prior to fracture, but were unable to prevent fracture for severe impacts. The Gamma Nail® system consistently produced the largest strength increases relative to the unaugmented femur for all five specimens in both the pendulum-drop FEMs and the femur-only simulations. In some cases, the same implant appeared to cause fractures in the acetabulum. The femur-only FEMs showed larger force increases than the pendulum-drop simulations, which suggests that the results of the femur-only simulations may not represent sideways falls as accurately as the soft tissue-embedded pendulum-drop simulations. The results from this study demonstrate the ability to simulate a high energy phenomenon and the effect of implants in an in silico environment. The results also suggest that implants could increase the force applied to the proximal femur during impact. Fracture outcomes from the tested implants can be used to inform the design of future devices, which reaffirms the value of modelling with biofidelic considerations in the implant design process. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper to use more complex biofidelic FEMs to assess prophylactic femoral augmentation methods.

Preventing hip fractures with multidisciplinary teams: a Canadian perspective

Fragility fractures (FFs) are low-energy trauma fractures that occur at or below standing height. Among FFs, hip fractures are associated with the greatest morbidity, mortality and cost to Canadian health care systems. This review highlights the current state of medical care for hip fractures in Canada, with specific focus on the role of the multidisciplinary team. Gaps in care exist, as FFs represent a unique challenge requiring both acute and chronic management. Furthermore, there is a lack of ownership of FFs by a medical specialty. These gaps can be addressed through the use of multidisciplinary teams, which have been shown to be efficacious and cost-effective. This model of care also addresses numerous patient-identified barriers to treatment, including inadequate patient counselling. However, there is still room for improvement in both the identification of patients at risk for hip fracture and patient adherence to therapy.

A multi-site review of second hip fractures across 6 Dublin teaching hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Fragility hip fractures are common and costly. Secondary fracture prevention is a treatment goal following hip fracture; however, the number of those that proceed to fracture their contralateral hip in Ireland is unknown. There are plans to introduce a Fracture Liaison Service Database in Ireland which will aim to prevent secondary fractures. To establish a baseline figure for secondary hip fractures, the injury radiographs of 1284 patients from 6 teaching hospitals over a 1-year period were reviewed.

METHODS

Irish Hip Fracture Datasheets and corresponding injury radiographs were reviewed locally for all hip fractures within each respective teaching hospital for a 1-year period (2019).

RESULTS

A total of 8.7% of all fragility hip fractures across the 6 hospitals were secondary hip fractures (range 4.9-11.5%). 46% occurred within years 1 to 3 following index hip fracture. Forty-eight per cent of patients were started on bone protection medications following their second hip fracture.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 11 hip fractures treated across the 6 teaching hospitals assessed in 2019 was a patient's second hip fracture. We advocate for the widespread availability of Fracture Liaison Services to patients throughout Ireland to assist secondary fracture prevention.

Contralateral non-simultaneous proximal femoral fractures in patients over 65 years old

Purpose

Epidemiological and clinical parameters according to the Parker-Palmer Index (PPI) have not been specifically studied as predictors of re-fracture time in patients over 65 years old with contralateral hip fracture. The main purpose of this study was to assess whether these parameters could represent a prognostic factor in this population.

Methods

This retrospective study included all consecutive patients older than 65 years that suffered from a proximal femoral fracture, 31 according to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, treated at our unit between Feb 1st 2019 and Feb 1st 2020.

Results

This study enrolled 387 patients. Thirty-seven of them had already incurred a contralateral hip fracture: seven males and 30 females. The median time between the first and second hip fractures was 3.5 years. This study revealed that increasing age (p = 0.003), male sex (p = 0.029) and a PPI value ≥ 5 between the first and second hip fracture (p = 0.015) are risk factors associated with a contralateral hip fracture in the first three years after the first episode. There were no statistically significant differences regarding anti-osteoporotic therapy and the anatomic site of the first hip fracture episode.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that several risk factors have a crucial role in hip re-fracture time in patients over 65 years old.

The impact of second hip fracture on rehospitalization and mortality in older adults

PURPOSE

Although a second hip fracture is not uncommon in the older population, the extent to which such an event may affect health-related outcomes has not been fully clarified. We aimed to evaluate the risk of new falls, functional decline, rehospitalization, institutionalization and mortality in older patients admitted for a second vs. a first hip fracture.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 288 older patients admitted to the Orthogeriatric Unit of Bolzano Hospital (northern Italy) and surgically treated for a hip fracture from June 2016 to June 2017. Socio-demographic data and hospitalization-related information were collected and a multidimensional assessment was made upon admission and during the hospital stay. Fifteen months after discharge, data on mobility level, functional status, institutionalization, and new falls were obtained from personal or structured phone interviews. Information on rehospitalization and mortality was obtained from local hospital registers.

RESULTS

One out of six patients (14.6 %) admitted was suffering a second hip fracture, of which only 16.7 % were on antiresorptive therapies. At the 15-month follow-up, individuals who had been treated for a second hip fracture were more likely than those treated for their first to have low mobility levels (OR = 4.13, 95 %CI:1.23-13.84), to be rehospitalized (OR = 2.57, 95 %CI:1.12-5.90), and to have a higher mortality (HR = 1.81, 95 %CI:1.05-3.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of a second hip fracture may further affect the clinical vulnerability and mortality of older adults. These results highlight the need to implement preventive action to minimize the risk of re-fracture after the first event.

Clinical practice and nursing management of pre-operative skin or skeletal traction for hip fractures in elderly patients: a cross-sectional three-institution study

BACKGROUND

Femoral fractures are a major healthcare problem worldwide. One of the most difficult issues is their preoperative care, which is still managed by either skeletal or skin traction in some countries, including Italy. These issues are discussed and compared with the contemporary literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyse the distribution of these treatment options within the orthopaedic community and the reasons for their use, as well as to identify how this may impact nursing care in terms of pain management, hygiene care, venous thromboembolism (VTE)prophylaxis and prevention of pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

For this cross-sectional study, a 12-item survey was administered to the nursing staff, consultants and residents of the Orthopaedic Units in three different hospitals in NorthEastern Italy. The questionnaire investigated the routine use of skeletal or skin traction for the preoperative management of hip fractures in those settings.

FINDINGS

136 surveys were completed, providing a response rate of 87.74%. Preoperative traction for hip fractures was still in use in the three hospitals, mainly applied by experienced surgeons for subtrochanteric fractures. Pain management, VTE and pressure ulcer prevention were perceived as worse only with skeletal traction, while hygiene was described as more difficult with both skeletal and skin traction.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the data and the literature revision, skin or skeletal traction for patients with proximal femoral fractures should be discouraged as standard practice. This is supported widely in the international literature, and consideration of knowledge translation strategies should be made to refine current practice in these settings.

Comparison of functional outcome of bipolar hip arthroplasty and total hip replacement in displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly in a developing country: a 2-year prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term functional outcome between bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) and total hip replacement (THR) in displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in a developing country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted which included a total of 42 patients of age more than 60 years with closed displaced femoral neck fractures, and the patients were randomized into two groups of 21 patients each and their outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

At 24-month follow-up, patients in BHA group had a mean modified Harris hip score of 83.85 ± 6.62 and patients in THR group had a mean modified Harris hip score of 88.00 ± 5.76 (p value = 0.067). Seven (35%) patients in BHA group and 11 (55%) patients in THR group had hip scores from 91 to 100 (excellent), 9 (45%) patients in BHA and seven patients (35%) in THR had hip scores 81-90 (fair) and 4 (20%) patients in BHA group and 2 (10%) patients in THR group were rated 71-80 (good) and none was found in poor category. Total amount of blood  loss while performing BHA was 238.15 ± 20.43 ml compared to 336.85 ± 23.56 ml in THR (p < 0.0001). Mean of total duration of surgery was found to be 51.80 ± 8.70 min in BHA group which was significantly lesser than 119.10 ± 16.75 min of THR group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

BHA being comparable to THR in terms of functional outcome by modified Harris hip scoring with significantly less blood loss during surgery, less duration of surgery, more cost-effective can be recommended as first line of surgical management in elderly patients with displaced femur neck fractures in developing countries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial.