Growth stimulating antibody, as another predisposing factor of Graves' disease (GD): analysis using monoclonal TSH receptor antibodies derived from patients with GD

TSH/IGF-1 Receptor Cross Talk in Graves' Ophthalmopathy Pathogenesis

CONTEXT

The TSH receptor (TSHR) is considered the main target of stimulatory autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO); however, it has been suggested that stimulatory IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) autoantibodies also play a role.

OBJECTIVE

We previously demonstrated that a monoclonal stimulatory TSHR antibody, M22, activates TSHR/IGF-1R cross talk in orbital fibroblasts/preadipocytes obtained from patients with GO (GO fibroblasts [GOFs]). We show that cross talk between TSHR and IGF-1R, not direct IGF-1R activation, is involved in the mediation of GO pathogenesis stimulated by Graves' autoantibodies.

DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Immunoglobulins were purified from the sera of 57 GO patients (GO-Igs) and tested for their ability to activate TSHR and/or IGF-1R directly and TSHR/IGF-1R cross talk in primary cultures of GOFs. Cells were treated with M22 or GO-Igs with or without IGF-1R inhibitory antibodies or linsitinib, an IGF-1R kinase inhibitor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid [HA]) secretion was measured as a major biological response for GOF stimulation. IGF-1R autophosphorylation was used as a measure of direct IGF-1R activation. TSHR activation was determined through cAMP production.

RESULTS

A total of 42 out of 57 GO-Ig samples stimulated HA secretion. None of the GO-Ig samples exhibited evidence for IGF-1R autophosphorylation. Both anti-IGF-1R antibodies completely inhibited IGF-1 stimulation of HA secretion. By contrast, only 1 IGF-1R antibody partially blocked HA secretion stimulated by M22 or GO-Igs in a manner similar to linsitinib, whereas the other IGF-1R antibody had no effect on M22 or GO-Ig stimulation. These findings show that the IGF-1R is involved in GO-Igs stimulation of HA secretion without direct activation of IGF-1R.

CONCLUSIONS

IGF-1R activation by GO-Igs occurs via TSHR/IGF-1R cross talk rather than direct binding to IGF-1R, and this cross talk is important in the pathogenesis of GO.

Bioassays for TSH Receptor Autoantibodies, from FRTL-5 Cells to TSH Receptor-LH/CG Receptor Chimeras: The Contribution of Leonard D. Kohn

Since the discovery 60 years ago of the "long-acting thyroid stimulator" by Adams and Purves, great progress has been made in the detection of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAbs) in Graves' disease. Today, commercial assays are available that can detect TRAbs with high accuracy and provide diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with Graves' disease. The present review focuses on the development of TRAbs bioassays, and particularly on the role that Leonard D. Kohn had in this. Indeed, 30 years ago, the Kohn group developed a bioassay based on the use of FRTL-5 cells that was characterized by high reproducibility, feasibility, and diagnostic accuracy. Using this FRTL-5 bioassay, Kohn and his colleagues were the first to develop monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) against the TSHR. Furthermore, they demonstrated the multifaceted functional nature of TRAbs in patients with Graves' disease, with the identification of stimulating and blocking TRAbs, and even antibodies that activated pathways other than cAMP. After the cloning of the TSHR, the Kohn laboratory constructed human TSHR-rat luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor chimeras. This paved the way to a new bioassay based on the use of non-thyroid cells transfected with the Mc4 chimera. The new Mc4 bioassay is characterized by high diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, greater than for other assays. The availability of a commercial kit based on the Mc4 chimera is spreading the use of this assay worldwide, indicating its benefits for these patients with Graves' disease. This review also describes the main contributions made by other researchers in TSHR molecular biology and TRAbs assay, especially with the development of highly potent moAbs. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the main TRAbs assays, as both immunoassays and bioassays, is also provided.