1
|
Staats P, Deer TR, Hunter C, Li S, Dickerson D, Petersen E, Kapural L, Durbhakula S, Gilligan C, Slavin KV, Pope J, Amirdelfan K, Poree L, Naidu R, Levy RM. Remote Management of Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices for Chronic Pain: Expert Recommendations on Best Practices for Proper Utilization and Future Considerations. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1295-1308. [PMID: 37632517 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Emerging spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remote monitoring and programming technologies provide a unique opportunity to address challenges of in-person visits and improve patient care, although clinical guidance on implementation is needed. The goal of this document is to establish best clinical practices for integration of remote device management into the care of patients with SCS, including remote monitoring and remote programming. MATERIALS AND METHODS A panel of experts in SCS met in July 2022, and additional experts contributed to the development of recommendations after the meeting via survey responses and correspondence. RESULTS Major goals of remote SCS device management were identified, including prompt identification and resolution of SCS-related issues. The panel identified metrics for remote monitoring and classified them into three categories: device-related (eg, stimulation usage); measurable physiologic or disease-related (eg, patient physical activity or pedometry); and patient-reported (eg, sleep quality and pain intensity). Recommendations were made for frequency of reviewing remote monitoring metrics, although providers should tailor follow-up to individual patient needs. Such periodic reviews of remote monitoring metrics would occur separately from automatic monitoring system notifications (if key metrics fall outside an acceptable range). The guidelines were developed in consideration of reimbursement processes, privacy concerns, and the responsibilities of the care team, industry professionals, manufacturers, patients, and caregivers. Both existing and needed clinical evidence were covered, including outcomes of interest for future studies. CONCLUSIONS Given the expansion of SCS device capabilities, this document provides critical guidance on best practices for using remote device management, although medical necessity should drive all remote monitoring decisions, with individualized patient care. The authors also describe the potential of these emerging technologies to improve outcomes for patients with SCS, although more clinical evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Staats
- National Spine and Pain Centers, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | - Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean Li
- Premier Pain Centers (an affiliate of National Spine and Pain Centers), Shrewsbury, NJ, USA
| | - David Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Erika Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Shravani Durbhakula
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Konstantin V Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Neurology Section, Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jason Pope
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA
| | | | - Lawrence Poree
- Neuromodulation Services, Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ramana Naidu
- MarinHealth Spine Institute, a UCSF Affiliate, Larkspur, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schnoor K, Versluis A, Bakema R, van Luenen S, Kooij MJ, van den Heuvel JM, Teichert M, Honkoop PJ, van Boven JFM, Chavannes NH, Aardoom JJ. A Pharmacy-Based eHealth Intervention Promoting Correct Use of Medication in Patients With Asthma and COPD: Nonrandomized Pre-Post Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e32396. [PMID: 35675120 PMCID: PMC9218880 DOI: 10.2196/32396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affect millions of people worldwide. While medication can control and improve disease symptoms, incorrect use of medication is a common problem. The eHealth intervention SARA (Service Apothecary Respiratory Advice) aims to improve participants' correct use of inhalation medication by providing information and as-needed tailored follow-up support by a pharmacist. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SARA on exacerbation rates in participants with asthma and COPD. Secondary aims were to investigate its effects in terms of adherence to maintenance medication and antimycotic treatment. METHODS In this nonrandomized pre-post study, medication dispensing data from 382 Dutch community pharmacies were included. Exacerbation rates were assessed with dispensed short-course oral corticosteroids. Medication adherence between new and chronic users was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered from dispensed inhalation maintenance medication. Antimycotic treatment was investigated from dispensed oral antimycotics in participants who were also dispensed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Outcomes were assessed 1 year before and 1 year after implementation of SARA and were compared between SARA participants and control participants. More specifically, for exacerbation rates and medication adherence, a difference score was calculated (ie, 1 year after SARA minus 1 year before SARA) and was subsequently compared between the study groups with independent-samples t tests. For antimycotics, the relative number of participants who were dispensed antimycotics was calculated and subsequently analyzed with a mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS The study population comprised 9452 participants, of whom 2400 (25.39%) were SARA participants. The mean age of the population was 60.8 (15.0) years, and approximately two-thirds (n=5677, 60.06%) were female. The results showed an increase in mean exacerbation rates over time for both study groups (SARA: 0.05; control: 0.15). However, this increase in exacerbation rates was significantly lower for SARA participants (t9450=3.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.16; P=.002; Cohen d=0.06). Chronic users of inhalation medication in both study groups showed an increase in mean medication adherence over time (SARA: 6.73; control: 4.48); however, this increase was significantly higher for SARA participants (t5886=-2.74, 95% CI -3.86 to -0.84; P=.01; Cohen d=-0.07). Among new users of inhalation medication, results showed no significant difference in medication adherence between SARA and control participants in the year after implementation of SARA (t1434=-1.85, 95% CI -5.60 to 0.16; P=.06; Cohen d=-0.10). Among ICS users, no significant differences between the study groups were found over time in terms of the proportion of participants who were dispensed antimycotics (t5654=0.29, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.54; P=.76; Cohen d=0). CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence that the SARA eHealth intervention might have the potential to decrease exacerbation rates and improve medication adherence among patients with asthma and COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyma Schnoor
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anke Versluis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Robbert Bakema
- Nederlandse Service Apotheek Beheer, 's Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Sanne van Luenen
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - J Maurik van den Heuvel
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martina Teichert
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Persijn J Honkoop
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jiska J Aardoom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Bona D, Crimi C, D'Uggento AM, Benfante A, Caiaffa MF, Calabrese C, Campisi R, Carpagnano GE, Ciotta D, D'Amato M, Pelaia C, Pelaia G, Pellegrino S, Scichilone N, Scioscia G, Ribecco N, Spadaro G, Valenti G, Vatrella A, Crimi N, Macchia L. Effectiveness of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: Distinct sub-phenotypes of response identified by cluster analysis. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 52:312-323. [PMID: 34608696 PMCID: PMC9293293 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benralizumab is effective in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), but suboptimal responses are observed in some patients. Although several factors have been associated with benralizumab response, no cluster analysis has yet been undertaken to identify different responsiveness sub-phenotypes. OBJECTIVE To identify SEA sub-phenotypes with differential responsiveness to benralizumab. METHODS One hundred and five patients diagnosed with SEA who had completed 6 months of benralizumab treatment were included in a hierarchical cluster analysis based on a set of clinical variables that can be easily collected in routine practice (age, age at disease onset, disease length, allergen sensitization status, blood eosinophil count, IgE levels, FEV1 % predicted, nasal polyposis, bronchiectasis). RESULTS Four clusters were identified: Clusters 2 and 3 included patients with high levels of both IgE and eosinophils (type-2 biomarkers high), whereas Clusters 1 and 4 included patients with only one type-2 biomarker at a high level: IgE in Cluster 1 and eosinophils in Cluster 4. Clusters 2 and 3 (both type-2 biomarkers high) showed the highest response rate to benralizumab in terms of elimination of exacerbations (79% and 80% respectively) compared to Clusters 1 and 4 (52% and 60% respectively). When super-response (the absence of exacerbation without oral corticosteroid use) was assessed, Cluster 2, including patients with more preserved lung function than the other clusters, but comparable exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid use and symptom severity, was the most responsive cluster (87.5% of patients). CONCLUSIONS Our cluster analysis identified benralizumab differential response sub-phenotypes in SEA, with the potential of improving disease treatment and precision management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari - Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudia Crimi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Alida Benfante
- Department of Biomedicine and Internal and Specialistic Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Cecilia Calabrese
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Raffaele Campisi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Section of Respiratory Disease, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Domenico Ciotta
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Maria D'Amato
- Division of Pneumology, "V. Monaldi" University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Corrado Pelaia
- Department of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Girolamo Pelaia
- Department of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Simona Pellegrino
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Nicola Scichilone
- Department of Biomedicine and Internal and Specialistic Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulia Scioscia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Nunziata Ribecco
- Department of Economics and Finance, University of Bari - Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spadaro
- Allergology and Immunology Unit, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Valenti
- Allergology and Pulmonology Unit, Provincial Outpatient Center of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vatrella
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Nunzio Crimi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Luigi Macchia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari - Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niu C, Xu Y, Schuler CL, Gu L, Arora K, Huang Y, Naren AP, Durrani SR, Hossain MM, Guilbert TW. Evaluation of Risk Scores to Predict Pediatric Severe Asthma Exacerbations. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4393-4401.e8. [PMID: 34506966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma exacerbations commonly lead to unplanned health care utilization and are costly. Early identification of children at increased risk of asthma exacerbations would allow a proactive management approach. OBJECTIVE We evaluated common asthma risk factors to predict the probability of exacerbation for individual children aged 0-21 years using data from the electronic medical record (EMR). METHODS We analyzed longitudinal EMR data for over 3000 participants with asthma seen at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center over a 7-year period. The study population was divided into 3 age groups: 0-4, 5-11, and 12-21 years. Each age group was divided into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort, which were used to build a risk score model. We predicted risk of exacerbation in the next 12 months, validated the scores by risk stratum, and developed a clinical tool to determine the risk level based on this model. RESULTS Risk model results were confirmed with validation cohorts by calendar year and age groups. Race, allergic sensitization, and smoke exposure were each important risk factors in the 0-4 age group. Abnormal spirometry and obesity were more sensitive predictors of exacerbation in children >12 years. For each age group, a higher expanded score was associated with a higher predicted probability of an asthma exacerbation in the subsequent year. CONCLUSION This asthma exacerbation prediction model, and the associated clinical tool, may assist clinicians in identifying children at high risk for exacerbation that may benefit from more aggressive management and targeted risk mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Niu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuanfang Xu
- Division of Oncology, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ
| | - Christine L Schuler
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lijuan Gu
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kavisha Arora
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Yunjie Huang
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Anjaparavanda P Naren
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Sandy R Durrani
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Md M Hossain
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Theresa W Guilbert
- Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanamori R, Yamane S, Seto T. Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Thyrotropin Alfa in Japanese Patients: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study. Adv Ther 2021; 38:4949-4960. [PMID: 34386895 PMCID: PMC8408065 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01866-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-world evidence of the safety and effectiveness of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH; thyrotropin alfa) in Japanese patients is lacking. METHODS This was a post-marketing surveillance study that included all Japanese patients who received thyrotropin alfa, either as a supporting diagnostic from January 2009 to December 2016, or as adjunctive treatment for ablation from May 2012 to October 2018. Information was collected on patient demographics, thyroid cancer characteristics, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), scintigraphy, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) testing, and hypothyroidism symptoms. RESULTS A total of 9268 patients were included in the safety analysis and 9031 in the effectiveness analysis. In the safety analysis set, 3444 patients received thyrotropin alfa as a diagnostic and 5822 received it as treatment. ADRs occurred in 7.1% (n = 660) of patients, including 9.4% (n = 324) of patients who received thyrotropin alfa as a diagnostic and 5.8% (n = 336) of patients who received it as treatment. Nausea was the most common ADR (4.0% of overall safety population). Among patients who received thyrotropin alfa as a diagnostic (n = 1835), the Tg test was positive in 53.6% after the second dose. The scintigram was rated as "readable" in 3023 of the 3054 patients included in this analysis (99.0%). Of the 765 patients who were included in the assessment of response to ablation at 6 months to 1 year after the procedure, 621 (81.2%) were considered to have had "treatment success". There were no significant differences in the proportions of patients who had hypothyroidism symptoms before the first and after the second dose of thyrotropin alfa. CONCLUSION In this large post-marketing surveillance study, thyrotropin alfa was well tolerated and showed effectiveness that was comparable to that observed in randomised, controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rie Kanamori
- Sanofi Genzyme Medical, Oncology Medical, Sanofi K.K., Tokyo Opera City Tower, 3-20-2 Nishi Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-1488, Japan.
| | - Shiho Yamane
- Medical Affairs, Post-Authorization Regulatory Studies, Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Seto
- Medical Affairs, Post-Authorization Regulatory Studies, Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prens LM, Bouwman K, Aarts P, Arends S, van Straalen KR, Dudink K, Horváth B, Prens EP. Adalimumab and infliximab survival in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a daily practice cohort study. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:177-184. [PMID: 33544917 PMCID: PMC8360014 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologics are often required for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, data on the drug survival of biologics in daily practice are currently lacking. OBJECTIVES To assess the drug survival of antitumour necrosis factor biologics in a daily practice cohort of patients with HS and to identify predictors for drug survival. METHODS A retrospective multicentre study was performed in two academic dermatology centres in the Netherlands. Adult patients with HS using biologics between 2008 and 2020 were included. Drug survival was analysed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and predictors of survival with univariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The overall drug survival of adalimumab (n = 104) at 12 and 24 months was 56·3% and 30·5%, respectively, which was predominantly determined by infectiveness. Older age (P = 0·02) and longer disease duration (P < 0·01) were associated with longer survival time. For infliximab (n = 44), overall drug survival was 58·3% and 48·6% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, and was predominantly determined by infectiveness and side-effects. Surgery during treatment was associated with a longer survival time (P = 0·01). CONCLUSIONS Survival rates were comparable for adalimumab and infliximab at 12 months, and were mainly determined by ineffectiveness. Age, disease duration (adalimumab) and surgery (infliximab) are predictors for longer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Prens
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K Bouwman
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - P Aarts
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Dermatology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Arends
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K R van Straalen
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Dermatology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Dudink
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Dermatology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Horváth
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - E P Prens
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Dermatology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka S, Mizutani H, Tsuruya E, Fukuda R, Kuge K, Okubo N. Long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: 3-year post-marketing surveillance study. J Bone Miner Metab 2021; 39:463-473. [PMID: 33387064 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-020-01180-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Denosumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan in 2013. This study aimed to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS This 3-year, prospective, observational, post-marketing study included patients who initiated treatment with denosumab (60 mg/6 months) for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Key endpoints were adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), occurrence of osteoporotic fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors of hypocalcaemia and percent change in BMD. RESULTS Overall, 3534 patients were assessed (mean 75.7 years; 89.8% women). In total, 298 patients (8.4%) developed ADRs; the most common was hypocalcaemia (3.9%). Hypocalcaemia risk was significantly increased in patients with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, no prior use of bisphosphonates, prior use of calcium and vitamin D preparations, baseline serum calcium < 8.5 mg/dL, and no concomitant use of calcium or vitamin D preparations. Six patients had adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Lumbar spine BMD increased significantly from baseline (mean percent change: 11.4% at 36 months). All bone turnover markers decreased significantly from baseline. Over 3 years, 3.3% of patients developed a new osteoporotic fracture. CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed the long-term safety and effectiveness of denosumab in Japanese patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice. No new safety signals were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakae Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hideki Mizutani
- Post Marketing Study Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1, Nihonbashi Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8426, Japan.
| | - Eri Tsuruya
- Post Marketing Study Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1, Nihonbashi Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8426, Japan
| | - Ryoko Fukuda
- Post Marketing Study Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1, Nihonbashi Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8426, Japan
| | - Kiyoka Kuge
- Post Marketing Study Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1, Nihonbashi Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8426, Japan
| | - Naoki Okubo
- Biostatistics and Data Management Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baranidharan G, Edgar D, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Lalkhen AG, Fritz AK, Vajramani G. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Real-World Retrospective Studies. Biomedicines 2021; 9:180. [PMID: 33670252 PMCID: PMC7918133 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly utilized globally to treat chronic pain syndromes. Real-world evidence complementing randomized controlled trials supporting its use, has accumulated over the last decade. This systematic review aims to summarize the retrospective literature with reference to the efficacy and safety of 10 kHz SCS. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed between 1 January 2009 and 21 August 2020 for English-language retrospective studies of ≥3 human subjects implanted with a Senza® 10 kHz SCS system and followed-up for ≥3 months. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts of 327 studies and 46 full-text manuscripts. In total, 16 articles were eligible for inclusion; 15 reported effectiveness outcomes and 11 presented safety outcomes. Follow-up duration ranged from 6-34 months. Mean pain relief was >50% in most studies, regardless of follow-up duration. Responder rates ranged from 67-100% at ≤12 months follow-up, and from 46-76% thereafter. 32-71% of patients decreased opioid or nonopioid analgesia intake. Complication incidence rates were consistent with other published SCS literature. Findings suggest 10 kHz SCS provides safe and durable pain relief in pragmatic populations of chronic pain patients. Furthermore, it may decrease opioid requirements, highlighting the key role 10 kHz SCS can play in the medium-term management of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesan Baranidharan
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | - Beatrice Bretherton
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tracey Crowther
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK; (B.B.); (T.C.)
| | | | - Ann-Katrin Fritz
- Pain Management Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK;
| | - Girish Vajramani
- Centre for Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vestbo J, Janson C, Nuevo J, Price D. Observational studies assessing the pharmacological treatment of obstructive lung disease: strengths, challenges and considerations for study design. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6:00044-2020. [PMID: 33083435 PMCID: PMC7553106 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00044-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating treatment efficacy in patients with obstructive lung disease. However, due to strict inclusion criteria and the conditions required for ascertaining statistical significance, the patients included typically represent as little as 5% of the general obstructive lung disease population. Thus, studies in broader patient populations are becoming increasingly important. These can be randomised effectiveness trials or observational studies providing data on real-world treatment effectiveness and safety data that complement efficacy RCTs. In this review we describe the features associated with the diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the real-world clinical practice setting. We also discuss how RCTs and observational studies have reported opposing outcomes with several treatments and inhaler devices due to differences in study design and the variations in patients recruited by different study types. Whilst observational studies are not without weaknesses, we outline recently developed tools for defining markers of quality of observational studies. We also examine how observational studies are capable of providing valuable insights into disease mechanisms and management and how they are a vital component of research into obstructive lung disease. As we move into an era of personalised medicine, recent observational studies, such as the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY), have the capacity to provide a greater understanding of the value of a personalised healthcare approach in patients in clinical practice by focussing on standardised outcome measures of patient-reported outcomes, physician assessments, airway physiology, and blood and airway biomarkers across both primary and specialist care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørgen Vestbo
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christer Janson
- Dept of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hassanein M, Amod A, Khunti K, Lee MK, Mohan V. Introduction: Real-World Evidence in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:29-32. [PMID: 32440834 PMCID: PMC7415044 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00832-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Hassanein
- United Arab Emirates Department of Endocrinology, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Aslam Amod
- Life Chatsmed Garden Hospital and Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, South Africa
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Moon-Kyu Lee
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Gumi, Kyungsangbuk-do, 39371, South Korea
| | - Viswanathan Mohan
- Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sayed D, Salmon J, Khan TW, Sack AM, Braun T, Barnard A, Rotte A. Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Outcomes of 10 kHz SCS in Patients with Upper Limb and Neck Pain. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1441-1448. [PMID: 32606910 PMCID: PMC7304671 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s257071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients living with chronic upper limb and neck (ULN) pain are reliant on often ineffective therapies as they face limited options for effective long-term treatment. OBJECTIVE Prospective clinical studies have demonstrated that high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz (10 kHz SCS) is effective in treating chronic pain in multiple etiologies including ULN pain. This study aimed at validating the findings from clinical studies on ULN in a real-world cohort. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective, observational review. SETTING A multicenter review between April 2016 and August 2019. PATIENTS AND METHODS Anonymized data were extracted from a real-world database of 47 consecutive patients aged ≥18 years of age with chronic upper limb and/or neck pain who were trialed and permanently implanted with 10 kHz SCS. Patient-reported pain relief, quality of life, function, sleep and medication use were extracted from anonymised patient records where available. Responder rates, defined as the proportion of patients with at least 50% pain relief at the end of trial and the last visit after implantation, were calculated. RESULTS All patients reported successful response (≥50% pain relief) at the end of trial and >75% patients continued to respond to the therapy at the last follow-up period. Majority (72%) of patients reported improvement in function, about half of the patients (53%) reported improvement in sleep and one-third of the patients (36%) reported reducing their medication at last follow-up. CONCLUSION 10 kHz SCS provides durable pain relief to patients with chronic upper limb and neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawood Sayed
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - John Salmon
- PainCare Perth, Parkland House, Cottesloe, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Talal W Khan
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrew M Sack
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Ted Braun
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Real-world efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Korean patients with hypertension from the BENEFIT KOREA study. J Hypertens 2020; 38:527-535. [DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Nieber K, Raskopf E, Möller J, Kelber O, Fürst R, Shah-Hosseini K, Singh J, Kraft K, Mösgens R. Pharmaco-epidemiological research on herbal medicinal products in the paediatric population: data from the PhytoVIS study. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179:507-512. [PMID: 31823076 PMCID: PMC7028796 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03532-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
In paediatrics, clinical study data are limited, especially on herbal medicinal products. To address this gap, 2063 datasets from the paediatric population were evaluated in the PhytoVIS data base. By screening for paediatric data, information on indication, gender, treatment, co-medication and tolerability were evaluated. The majority of patients was treated because of common cold, fever, digestive complaints, skin diseases, sleep disturbances and anxiety. The perceived effect of the therapy was rated in 84% of the patients as very good or good without adverse events. The data shed light on a still neglected field of phyto-pharmacotherapy by giving information on the use of herbal medicines in an unselected cohort of paediatric patients. The results confirm the good clinical effects and safety of herbal medicinal products in this patient population and show that they are widely used in Germany.What is Known:• In Germany, about 85% of children receive one or more herbal medicinal products per year.• Despite international initiatives to promote clinical research in paediatrics, there are still many gaps of knowledge in the use of drugs in paediatrics.What is New:• The PhytoVIS project evaluated 2063 data sets from the paediatric population using herbal medicinal products.• The majority of patients was treated because of common cold, fever, digestive complaints, skin diseases, sleep disturbances and anxiety, and 84% of the patients rated the therapy as very good or good without adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Nieber
- Institute of Pharmacy, University of Leipzig, Brüderstr. 34, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. .,Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Str. 218, 53173, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Esther Raskopf
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,ClinNovis GmbH, Genter Str. 7, 50672 Cologne, Germany
| | - Johanna Möller
- Bayer Consumer Health, Research & Development, Phytomedicines Supply and Development Center, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH, Havelstr. 5, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Olaf Kelber
- Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Str. 218, 53173 Bonn, Germany ,ClinNovis GmbH, Genter Str. 7, 50672 Cologne, Germany
| | - Robert Fürst
- Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Str. 218, 53173 Bonn, Germany ,grid.7839.50000 0004 1936 9721Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Str. 218, 53173 Bonn, Germany
| | - Jaswinder Singh
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,ClinNovis GmbH, Genter Str. 7, 50672 Cologne, Germany
| | - Karin Kraft
- Kooperation Phytopharmaka GbR, Plittersdorfer Str. 218, 53173 Bonn, Germany ,grid.10493.3f0000000121858338Chair of Naturopathy, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Ralph Mösgens
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany ,ClinNovis GmbH, Genter Str. 7, 50672 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Screening for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Reasons for Not Receiving Interventional Treatment. Lung 2019; 198:221-228. [PMID: 31832749 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-019-00303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is based on phase 2 studies and small randomized controlled trials with in- and exclusion criteria defining a therapeutic window and contraindications. Little is known about the applicability in routine clinical practice. AIM Which percentage of patients with severe emphysema referred to a specialized treatment center for BLVR is ultimately suitable for interventional bronchoscopic treatment? What is the relevance of the different contraindications? METHODS Retrospective evaluation of emphysema patients referred to Asklepios Fachkliniken Munich-Gauting for BLVR between January 2014 and June 2015. RESULTS 138 patients were referred for evaluation of BLVR. 38 patients (27.5%) underwent BLVR procedures (valves n = 18; coils n = 18; thermal vapor ablation n = 2). 100 patients (72.5%) were deemed not eligible for BLVR based on the following contraindications: 34% emphysema morphology and emphysema-related findings (severe homogeneous emphysema, extensive pleuropulmonary adhesions, postinflammatory scaring with natural volume reduction, giant bullae), 16% active smoking; 9% pulmonary function not within indication range; 8% unexpected CT findings (nodules, cancer, interstitial disease); 8% chronic ventilatory failure; 8% patient refused BLVR; 5% relevant comorbidity; 5% frequent exacerbations, 3% preserved quality of life, 4% other. CONCLUSION BLVR is a therapeutic option for highly selected patients. In our cohort, one in four could be treated. These data highlight the limitations of BLVR under real-life conditions.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Togias A, Schünemann HJ, Ansotegui I, Papadopoulos NG, Tsiligianni I, Agache I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Bedbrook A, Bergmann K, Bosnic‐Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brozek J, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Casale T, Cecchi L, Chu D, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham SR, Du Toit G, Dykewicz M, Ebisawa M, Fauquert JL, Fernandez‐Rivas M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca J, Fontaine J, Gerth van Wijk R, Haahtela T, Halken S, Hellings PW, Ierodiakonou D, Iinuma T, Ivancevich JC, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Kalayci O, Kleine Tebbe J, Klimek L, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, La Grutta S, Larenas‐Linemann D, Lau S, Laune D, Le L, Lodrup Carlsen K, Lourenço O, Malling H, Marien G, Menditto E, Mercier G, Mullol J, Muraro A, O’Hehir R, Okamoto Y, Pajno GB, Park H, Panzner P, Passalacqua G, Pham‐Thi N, Roberts G, Pawankar R, Rolland C, Rosario N, Ryan D, Samolinski B, Sanchez‐Borges M, Scadding G, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Sturm GJ, Todo Bom A, Toppila‐Salmi S, Valentin‐Rostan M, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Ventura M, Wahn U, Walker S, Wallace D, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. 2019 ARIA Care pathways for allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2019; 74:2087-2102. [PMID: 30955224 DOI: 10.1111/all.13805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a proven therapeutic option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. Many guidelines or national practice guidelines have been produced but the evidence-based method varies, many are complex and none propose care pathways. This paper reviews care pathways for AIT using strict criteria and provides simple recommendations that can be used by all stakeholders including healthcare professionals. The decision to prescribe AIT for the patient should be individualized and based on the relevance of the allergens, the persistence of symptoms despite appropriate medications according to guidelines as well as the availability of good-quality and efficacious extracts. Allergen extracts cannot be regarded as generics. Immunotherapy is selected by specialists for stratified patients. There are no currently available validated biomarkers that can predict AIT success. In adolescents and adults, AIT should be reserved for patients with moderate/severe rhinitis or for those with moderate asthma who, despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and adherence, continue to exhibit exacerbations that appear to be related to allergen exposure, except in some specific cases. Immunotherapy may be even more advantageous in patients with multimorbidity. In children, AIT may prevent asthma onset in patients with rhinitis. mHealth tools are promising for the stratification and follow-up of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA‐France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR Montpellier France
- INSERM U 1168, VIMA : Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches Villejuif France
- UMR‐S 1168 Université Versailles St‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines Montigny le Bretonneux France
- Euforea Brussels Belgium
- Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH Bethesda Maryland
| | - Holger J. Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | | | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou” University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Crete and International Primary Care Respiratory Group Crete Greece
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Romania
| | - Josep M. Anto
- Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL) ISGlobAL Barcelona Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) Barcelona Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Barcelona Spain
| | - Claus Bachert
- ENT Department, Upper Airways Research Laboratory Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA‐France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA‐LR Montpellier France
| | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Centre, Member of GALEN, Humboldt‐Uniersität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Sinthia Bosnic‐Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Local Health District University of Sydney Glebe New South Wales Australia
| | | | - Jan Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Moises A. Calderon
- Imperial College London ‐ National Heart and Lung Institute Royal Brompton Hospital NHS London UK
| | - Giorgio W. Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Clinic Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Research Hospital Humanitas University Milan Italy
| | - Luigi Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research University of Cartagena, Campus de Zaragocilla Cartagena Colombia
- Foundation for the Development of Medical and Biological Sciences (Fundemeb) Cartagena Colombia
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Vall d'Hebron & ARADyAL Research Network Barcelona Spain
| | - Thomas Casale
- Division of Allergy/Immunology University of South Florida Tampa Florida
| | - Lorenzo Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology USL Toscana Centro Prato Italy
| | - Derek Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Elisio Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (AgeUPNetWork) University of Porto Porto Portugal
| | - Alvaro A. Cruz
- ProAR – Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma Federal University of Bahia Salvador Brazil
- WHO GARD Planning Group Salvador Brazil
| | | | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Section, National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - George Du Toit
- Guy's and st Thomas' NHS Trust, Kings College London London UK
| | - Mark Dykewicz
- Section of Allergy and Immunology Saint Louis University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology Sagamihara National Hospital Sagamihara Japan
| | - Jean Luc Fauquert
- Unité de pneumo‐allergologie de l'enfant, pôle pédiatrique CHU de Clermont‐Ferrand‐Estaing Clermont‐Ferrand France
| | | | - Wytske J. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Centres Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - João Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technology and Information Systems Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal
- Medida, Lda Porto Portugal
| | | | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Allergology Erasmus MC Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Peter W. Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Despo Ierodiakonou
- Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Crete and International Primary Care Respiratory Group Crete Greece
| | - Tomohisa Iinuma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan
| | | | | | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
| | - Igor Kaidashev
- Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy Poltava Ukraine
| | - Musa Khaitov
- Institute of Immunology, Federal Medicobiological Agency, Laboratory of Molecular immunology National Research Center Moscow Russian Federation
| | - Omer Kalayci
- Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Unit Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Marek L. Kowalski
- Department of Immunology and Allergy, Healthy Ageing Research Center Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
- Sach's Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
| | - Violeta Kvedariene
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases and Allergology Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - Stefania La Grutta
- Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology (IBIM) National Research Council (CNR) Palermo Italy
| | - Désirée Larenas‐Linemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital México City Mexico
| | - Susanne Lau
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany
| | | | - Lan Le
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hochiminh City Vietnam
| | - Karin Lodrup Carlsen
- Department of Paediatrics Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - Olga Lourenço
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS – UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre University of Beira Interior Covilhã Portugal
| | | | | | - Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Gregoire Mercier
- Département de l’Information Médicale, Unité Médico‐Economie University Hospital Montpellier France
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department Hospital Clínic Barcelona Spain
- Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health Padua General University Hospital Padua Italy
| | - Robyn O’Hehir
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan
| | - Giovanni B. Pajno
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit University of Messina Messina Italy
| | - Hae‐Sim Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Ajou University School of Medicine Suwon South Korea
| | - Petr Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University in Prague Pilsen Czech Republic
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases Ospedale Policlino San Martino ‐University of Genoa Genoa Italy
| | | | - Graham Roberts
- David Hide Centre, St Mary's Hospital Isle of Wight and University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Department of Pediatrics Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | | | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Medical School, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - Bolesław Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
| | - Mario Sanchez‐Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department Centro Medico‐Docente La Trinidad Caracas Venezuela
| | - Glenis Scadding
- The Royal National TNE Hospital University College London London UK
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group Imperial College London London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Imperial College London London UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - Gunter J. Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Outpatient Allergy Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - Ana Todo Bom
- Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra and Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
| | - Sanna Toppila‐Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | | | - Arunas Valiulis
- Clinic of Children's Diseases Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine Vilnius Lithuania
- Department of Public Health Institute of Health Sciences Vilnius Lithuania
- European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS‐SP) Brussels Belgium
| | - Erkka Valovirta
- Department of Lung Diseases and Clinical Immunology, Terveystalo Allergy Clinic University of Turku Turku Finland
| | - Maria‐Teresa Ventura
- Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology University of Bari Medical School Bari Italy
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Pediatric Department Charité, Berlin Germany
| | | | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale Florida
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergy McMaster University Hamilton Ontario
| | - Arzu Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Celal Bayar University Manisa Turkey
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Centre, Member of GALEN, Humboldt‐Uniersität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
A systematic review of complementary and alternative medicine in oncology: Psychological and physical effects of manipulative and body-based practices. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223564. [PMID: 31622362 PMCID: PMC6797104 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) are widely used by cancer patients, despite limited evidence of efficacy. Manipulative and body-based practices are some of the most commonly used CAM. This systematic review evaluates their benefits in oncology. Method A systematic literature review was carried out with no restriction of language, time, cancer location or type. PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycArticle, PsychInfo, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and SOCindex were queried. Inclusion criteria were adult cancer patients and randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing manipulative and body-based complementary practices on psychological and symptom outcomes. Effect size was calculated when applicable. Results Of 1624 articles retrieved, 41 articles were included: massage (24), reflexology (11), acupressure (6). Overall, 25 studies showed positive and significant effects on symptom outcomes (versus 9 that did not), especially pain and fatigue. Mixed outcomes were found for quality of life (8 papers finding a significant effect vs. 10 which did not) and mood (14 papers vs. 13). In most studies, there was a high risk of bias with a mean Jadad score of 2, making interpretation of results difficult. Conclusion These results seem to indicate that manipulative CAM may be effective on symptom management in cancer. However, more robust methodologies are needed. The methodological requirements of randomized controlled trials are challenging, and more informative results may be provided by more pragmatic study design.
Collapse
|
17
|
Solidoro P, Patrucco F, Bagnasco D. Comparing a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol with other inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting beta-agonist combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 13:1087-1094. [DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1665514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Solidoro
- Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, SC Pneumologia U, Città della Salute e della Scienza (Molinette) University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo Patrucco
- Department of Translational Medicine, Pneumology Unit U, University of Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Diego Bagnasco
- Allergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bousquet J, Pham-Thi N, Bedbrook A, Agache I, Annesi-Maesano I, Ansotegui I, Anto JM, Bachert C, Benveniste S, Bewick M, Billo N, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bosse I, Brusselle G, Calderon MA, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Carriazo AM, Cash E, Cecchi L, Chu DK, Colgan E, Costa E, Cruz AA, Czarlewski W, Durham S, Ebisawa M, Erhola M, Fauquert JL, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Guldemond N, Iinuma T, Illario M, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linneman D, Laune D, Le LTT, Lourenço O, Malva JO, Marien G, Menditto E, Mullol J, Münter L, Okamoto Y, Onorato GL, Papadopoulos NG, Perala M, Pfaar O, Phillips A, Phillips J, Pinnock H, Portejoie F, Quinones-Delgado P, Rolland C, Rodts U, Samolinski B, Sanchez-Borges M, Schünemann HJ, Shamji M, Somekh D, Togias A, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Walker S, Wallace D, Valiulis A, Van der Kleij R, Ventura MT, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Next-generation care pathways for allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity: a model for multimorbid non-communicable diseases-Meeting Report (Part 2). J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:4072-4084. [PMID: 31656683 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France.,INSERM U1168, VIMA, Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, Villejuif, France.,Université Versailles St-Quentin-en Yvelines, UMR-S 1168, Montigny le Bretonneux, France.,Euforea, Brussels, Belgium.,Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany.,EUFOREA, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nhân Pham-Thi
- Allergy Department, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Isabella Annesi-Maesano
- Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases, Department Institute Pierre Louis of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM and Sorbonne Universités, Medical School Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Ignacio Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quirónsalud Bizkaia, Erandio, Spain
| | - Josep M Anto
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Samuel Benveniste
- National Center of Expertise in Cognitive Stimulation (CEN STIMCO), Broca Hospital, Paris, France.,Mines ParisTech CRI - PSL Research University, Fontainebleau, France
| | | | - Nils Billo
- Independent Consultant, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney and Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Moïses A Calderon
- Imperial College London-National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Clinic Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Campus de Zaragocilla, Edificio Biblioteca Primer piso, Cartagena, Colombia, and Foundation for the Development of Medical and Biological Sciences (Fundemeb), Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron & ARADyAL research network, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Eugene Cash
- College of Psychology, Nova Southeastern University and School-related Psychological Assessments and Clinical Interventions Clinic, Ft Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elaine Colgan
- Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, Northern Ireland, Belfast, UK
| | - Elisio Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (AgeUPNetWork), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Alvaro A Cruz
- ProAR-Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma, Federal University of Bahia, Brasil and WHO GARD Executive Committee, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Stephen Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Marina Erhola
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jean-Luc Fauquert
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Unité d'Allergologie de l'Enfant, Pôle Pédiatrique, Hôpital Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- EUFOREA, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joao A Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technology and Information Systems, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; and Medida, Lda Porto, Portugal
| | - Nick Guldemond
- Institute of Health Policy and Management iBMG, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tomohisa Iinuma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Maddalena Illario
- Division for Health Innovation, Campania Region and Federico II University Hospital Naples (R&D and DISMET), Naples, Italy
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Violeta Kvedariene
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Désirée Larenas-Linneman
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | | | - Lan T T Le
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
| | - Olga Lourenço
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS-UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Joao O Malva
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, and Ageing@Coimbra EIP-AHA Reference Site, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic; Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lars Münter
- Danish Committee for Health Education, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Nikos G Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou", University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maritta Perala
- University of Oulu, Faculty of Medicine, Oulun Yliopisto, Finland
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Phillipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
| | - Abigail Phillips
- Department of Health and Social Services, Welsh Government, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jim Phillips
- Director, Centre For Empowering Patients and Communities, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Pablo Quinones-Delgado
- Agency for Social Services and Dependency, Regional Government for Equality, Social Policies and Conciliation of Andalucia, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | - Boleslaw Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mario Sanchez-Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Medico-Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela
| | | | - Mohamed Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Imperial College London, and Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Somekh
- European Health Futures Forum (EHFF), Dromahair, Ireland
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sanna Toppila-Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Health Planning Unit, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece and International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London & Royal Brompton Hospital, Airways Disease Section, London, UK
| | | | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Arunas Valiulis
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine & Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rianne Van der Kleij
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Teresa Ventura
- University of Bari Medical School, Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, Bari, Italy
| | - Sian Williams
- International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Arzu Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Uniersität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy-Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Member of GA2LEN, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vermeulen FM, Gerbens LAA, Bosma AL, Apfelbacher CJ, Irvine AD, Arents BWM, Barbarot S, Deleuran M, Eichenfield LF, Manca A, Schmitt J, Vestergaard C, Wall D, Weidinger S, Middelkamp-Hup MA, Spuls PI, Flohr C. TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: consensus on how and when to measure the core dataset for atopic eczema treatment research registries. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:492-504. [PMID: 30719709 PMCID: PMC6771812 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Comparative, real‐life and long‐term evidence on the effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in moderate‐to‐severe atopic eczema (AE) is limited. Such data must come from well‐designed prospective patient registries. Standardization of data collection is needed for direct comparisons and data pooling. Objectives To reach a consensus on how and when to measure the previously defined domain items of the TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce core dataset for research registries for paediatric and adult patients with AE. Methods Proposals for the measurement instruments were based on recommendations of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative, the existing AE database of TREATgermany, systematic reviews of the literature and expert opinions. The proposals were discussed at three face‐to‐face consensus meetings, one teleconference and via e‐mail. The frequency of follow‐up visits was determined by an expert survey. Results A total of 16 experts from seven countries participated in the ‘how to measure’ consensus process and 12 external experts were consulted. A consensus was reached for all domain items on how they should be measured by assigning measurement instruments. A minimum follow‐up frequency of initially 4 weeks after commencing treatment, then every 3 months while on treatment and every 6 months while off treatment was defined. Conclusions This core dataset for national AE research registries will aid in the comparability and pooling of data across centres and country borders, and enables international collaboration to assess the long‐term effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy used in patients with AE. What's already known about this topic? Comparable, real‐life and long‐term data on the effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in patients with atopic eczema (AE) are needed. There is a high diversity of outcomes and instruments used in AE research, which require harmonization to enhance comparability and allow data pooling.
What does this study add? Our taskforce has reached international consensus on how and when to measure core domain items for national AE research registries. This core dataset is now available for use by researchers worldwide and will aid in the collection of unified data.
What are the clinical implications of this work? The data collected through this core dataset will help to gain better insights into the long‐term effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in AE and will provide important information for clinical practice. Standardization of such data collection at the national level will also allow direct data comparisons and pooling across country borders (e.g. in the analysis of treatment‐related adverse events that require large patient numbers).
Plain language summary available online Respond to this article
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L A A Gerbens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A L Bosma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - A D Irvine
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,National Children's Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B W M Arents
- Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, the Netherlands
| | - S Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - M Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L F Eichenfield
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A
| | - A Manca
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, U.K
| | - J Schmitt
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,University Allergy Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - C Vestergaard
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - D Wall
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.,Irish Skin Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S Weidinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - M A Middelkamp-Hup
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P I Spuls
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roche N, Campbell JD, Krishnan JA, Brusselle G, Chisholm A, Bjermer L, Thomas M, van Ganse E, van den Berge M, Christoff G, Quint J, Papadopoulos NG, Price D. Quality standards in respiratory real-life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force. Clin Transl Allergy 2019; 9:20. [PMID: 30962875 PMCID: PMC6436229 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-019-0255-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A Task Force was commissioned jointly by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) to develop a quality assessment tool for real-life observational research to identify high-quality real-life asthma studies that could be considered within future guideline development. METHODS The resulting REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was achieved through an extensive analysis of existing initiatives in this area. The first version was piloted among 9 raters across 6 articles; the revised, interim, version underwent extensive testing by 22 reviewers from the EAACI membership and REG collaborator group, leading to further revisions and tool finalisation. RELEVANT was validated through an analysis of real-life effectiveness studies identified via systematic review of Medline and Embase databases and relating to topics for which real-life studies may offer valuable evidence complementary to that from randomised controlled trials. The topics were selected through a vote among Task Force members and related to the influence of adherence, smoking, inhaler device and particle size on asthma treatment effectiveness. RESULTS Although highlighting a general lack of high-quality real-life effectiveness observational research on these clinically important topics, the analysis provided insights into how identified observational studies might inform asthma guidelines developers and clinicians. Overall, RELEVANT appeared reliable and easy to use by expert reviewers. CONCLUSIONS Using such quality appraisal tools is mandatory to assess whether specific observational real-life effectiveness studies can be used to inform guideline development and/or decision-making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Roche
- Pneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jonathan D. Campbell
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Reasearch, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | | | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Leif Bjermer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skane University Hospital, 221, 85 Lund, Sweden
| | - Mike Thomas
- University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Eric van Ganse
- Claude-Bernard Lyon1 University, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - George Christoff
- Medical University - Sofia, Faculty of Public Health, 8 “Bialo more” str, 1527, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Jennifer Quint
- Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | | | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, 60 Paya Lebar Road, Paya Lebar Square, #05-33/34, Singapore, 409051 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stauss T, El Majdoub F, Sayed D, Surges G, Rosenberg WS, Kapural L, Bundschu R, Lalkhen A, Patel N, Gliner B, Subbaroyan J, Rotte A, Edgar DR, Bettag M, Maarouf M. A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6:496-507. [PMID: 30911573 PMCID: PMC6414485 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) at 10 kHz has proven to be efficacious in the treatment of chronic back and leg pain in a randomized, controlled, trial (SENZA-RCT). However, large observational studies have yet to be published. Therefore, we performed a real-world, multicenter, retrospective, review of therapy efficacy in 1660 patients with chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Methods Data were collected in a real-world environment and retrospectively sourced from a global database. Included patients were trialed and/or permanently implanted with HF-SCS at 10 kHz between April 2014 and January 2018. We evaluated responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months post-implantation. Response was defined as ≥50% pain relief from baseline. A last visit analysis included responder rate along with overall change in function, sleep, quality of life, and medication intake versus baseline. Results Eighty-four percent of our HF-SCS-treated patients had both chronic back and leg pain. At least 70% of patients reported response to therapy throughout 12 months of follow-up. This sustained responder rate was corroborated by the last visit value (74.1%). Most patients reported concomitant improvements in function (72.3%), sleep (68.0%), and quality of life (90.3%) at their last visit versus baseline. Thirty-two percent of patients reported decreased medication intake at their last visit. Interpretation Sustained and effective pain relief was experienced by >70% of our HF-SCS-treated patients, consistent with the findings of a previously published randomized, controlled, trial. Our review provides complementary evidence to support the treatment of chronic back and leg pain with this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Faycal El Majdoub
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryCologne Merheim Medical CenterUniversity of Witten/HerdeckeCologneGermany
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansas
| | | | | | | | | | - Abdul Lalkhen
- The Manchester and Salford Pain CentreSalfordUnited Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mohammad Maarouf
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryCologne Merheim Medical CenterUniversity of Witten/HerdeckeCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Comparison of adverse events associated with different spacers used with non-extrafine beclometasone dipropionate for asthma. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2019; 29:3. [PMID: 30737400 PMCID: PMC6368625 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-019-0115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Co-prescription of Aerochamber® spacer with non-extrafine beclometasone diproprionate (non-EF BDP) is common but unlicensed. We report a comparison of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-related adverse events between patients co-prescribed Aerochamber compared to the licensed Volumatic® spacer. We utilised two historical cohorts: questionnaire-based and electronic medical record (EMR)-based, to assess patient-reported and EMR-recorded adverse events in patients with asthma prescribed non-EF BDP. Marginal effect estimate (MEE) was calculated to determine non-inferiority of Aerochamber compared to Volumatic in terms of patient-reported oral thrush and hoarseness with margin of 0.13. Other patient-reported adverse events (sore throat, bruising, weight gain, and coughing), and EMR-recorded adverse events were also assessed. Rate of patient-reported oral adverse events were non-inferior in 385 patients prescribed Aerochamber compared to 155 patients prescribed Volumatic (27.7 vs 29.9%; MEE, −0.043; 95% CI, −0.133 to 0.047). Total patient-reported adverse events did not differ significantly between Aerochamber and Volumatic (53.3 vs 49.7% with ≥1 adverse event). The EMR-based study of 1471 matched pairs of subjects did not show significantly different number of EMR-recorded adverse events between Aerochamber and Volumatic (12.5 vs 12.8% with ≥1 adverse events). Co-prescribing Aerochamber with non-EF BDP does not increase the risk for patient-reported and EMR-recorded ICS-related adverse events compared to co-prescribing Volumatic. A study of spacer devices for use with asthma inhalers shows no significant difference in the incidence of side-effects between licensed and unlicensed spacers. Spacers offer a way of improving the dose inhaled, particularly in children and those adults who struggle to use asthma inhalers correctly. However, non-extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate (like Clenil Modulite) inhalers are frequently co-prescribed with unlicensed Aerochamber spacers rather than the Volumatic spacer which is licensed for this drug. David Price at the University of Aberdeen, UK, and co-workers analysed data from two historical studies to verify whether Aerochamber use enhanced the risk of unpleasant side effects for patients, such as oral thrush or hoarseness. They found no significant difference between licensed and unlicensed spacers and the chances of adverse events, suggesting both are suitable for use with non-extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate inhalers.
Collapse
|
23
|
Webster J, Smith BD. The Case for Real-world Evidence in the Future of Clinical Research on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Ther 2019; 41:336-349. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
24
|
Reddel HK, Gerhardsson de Verdier M, Agustí A, Anderson G, Beasley R, Bel EH, Janson C, Make B, Martin RJ, Pavord I, Price D, Keen C, Gardev A, Rennard S, Sveréus A, Bansal AT, Brannman L, Karlsson N, Nuevo J, Nyberg F, Young SS, Vestbo J. Prospective observational study in patients with obstructive lung disease: NOVELTY design. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00036-2018. [PMID: 30723727 PMCID: PMC6355976 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00036-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have overlapping clinical features and share pathobiological mechanisms but are often considered distinct disorders. Prospective, observational studies across asthma, COPD and asthma–COPD overlap are limited. NOVELTY is a global, prospective observational 3-year study enrolling ∼12 000 patients ≥12 years of age from primary and specialist clinical practices in 19 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760329). NOVELTY's primary objectives are to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and disease burden over time, and to identify phenotypes and molecular endotypes associated with differential outcomes over time in patients with a diagnosis/suspected diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD. NOVELTY aims to recruit real-world patients, unlike clinical studies with restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data collected at yearly intervals include clinical assessments, spirometry, biospecimens, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare utilisation (HCU). PROs and HCU will also be collected 3-monthly via internet/telephone. Data will be used to identify phenotypes and endotypes associated with different trajectories for symptom burden, clinical progression or remission and HCU. Results may allow patient classification across obstructive lung disease by clinical outcomes and biomarker profile, rather than by conventional diagnostic labels and severity categories. NOVELTY will provide a rich data source on obstructive lung disease, to help improve patient outcomes and aid novel drug development. NOVELTY is a global study to characterise patients with asthma and/or COPD and identify novel phenotypes and endotypeshttp://ow.ly/QFiH30n3IBF
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen K Reddel
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Alvar Agustí
- Respiratory Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gary Anderson
- Lung Health Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Beasley
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Elisabeth H Bel
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christer Janson
- Dept of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Barry Make
- National Jewish Health and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Richard J Martin
- National Jewish Health and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Ian Pavord
- Nuffield Dept of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore and Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Christina Keen
- Early Clinical Development IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | - Stephen Rennard
- Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alecka Sveréus
- Respiratory TA, Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | | | - Niklas Karlsson
- Patient Reported Outcomes, Medical Evidence and Observational Research, Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Javier Nuevo
- Respiratory TA, Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fredrik Nyberg
- Medical Evidence and Observational Research, Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Simon S Young
- Precision Medicine and Genomics, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jørgen Vestbo
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grigg J, Nibber A, Paton JY, Chisholm A, Guilbert TW, Kaplan A, Turner S, Roche N, Hillyer EV, Price DB. Matched cohort study of therapeutic strategies to prevent preschool wheezing/asthma attacks. J Asthma Allergy 2018; 11:309-321. [PMID: 30588038 PMCID: PMC6294169 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s178531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) may prevent wheezing/asthma attacks in preschoolers with recurrent wheeze when added to short-acting β-agonist (SABA). Objective The aim of this historical matched cohort study was to assess the effectiveness of these treatments for preventing wheezing/asthma attacks. Methods Electronic medical records from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database were used to characterize a UK preschool population (1–5 years old) with two or more episodes of wheezing during 1 baseline year before first prescription (index date) of ICS or LTRA, or repeat prescription of SABA. Children initiating ICS or LTRA on the index date were matched 1:4 to those prescribed only SABA for age, sex, year of index prescription, mean baseline SABA dose, baseline attacks, baseline antibiotic prescriptions, and eczema diagnosis. Wheezing/asthma attacks (defined as asthma-related emergency attendance, hospital admission, or acute oral corticosteroid prescription) during 1 outcome year were compared using conditional logistic regression. Results Matched ICS and SABA cohorts included 990 and 3,960 children, respectively (61% male; mean [SD] age 3.2 [1.3] years), and matched LTRA and SABA cohorts included 259 and 1,036 children, respectively (65% male; mean [SD] age 2.6 [1.2] years). We observed no significant difference between matched cohorts in the odds of a wheezing/asthma attack: ICS vs SABA, OR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.85–1.19) and LTRA vs SABA, OR (95% CI) 1.28 (0.96–1.72). Conclusion We found no evidence that initiation of ICS or LTRA therapy is associated with fewer attacks during 1 outcome year than SABA alone for a heterogeneous group of preschool children with recurrent wheeze in the real-life clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Grigg
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK,
| | | | - James Y Paton
- School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary, and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Theresa W Guilbert
- Pulmonary Division, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alan Kaplan
- Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steve Turner
- Department of Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory Medicine, Cochin Hospital Group, AP-HP, University of Paris Descartes (EA2511), Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth V Hillyer
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.,Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Colice G, Chisholm A, Dima AL, Reddel HK, Burden A, Martin RJ, Brusselle G, Popov TA, von Ziegenweidt J, Price DB. Performance of database-derived severe exacerbations and asthma control measures in asthma: responsiveness and predictive utility in a UK primary care database with linked questionnaire data. Pragmat Obs Res 2018; 9:29-42. [PMID: 30127653 PMCID: PMC6092127 DOI: 10.2147/por.s151615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational research is essential to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of asthma treatments and can now make use of outcomes derived from electronic medical records. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of several database outcome measures in asthma. METHODS This study identified cohorts of patients with active asthma from a UK primary care database - Optimum Patient Care Research Database - approximately 10% of which was prospectively supplemented with questionnaire data. The "Questionnaire cohort" included patients aged 18-60 years with valid questionnaire data and 1 year of continuous primary care data. Separate "ICS initiation" and "ICS step-up" cohorts included patients aged 5-60 years initiated on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), who had 1 year of continuous primary care data before, and after, this index visit. Database measures of asthma symptom control and exacerbations were identified in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and cross-tabulated with corresponding patient-reported (questionnaire) data. Responsiveness of the database outcomes was analyzed, using McNemar's and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests, and Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between database outcomes and future risk of database exacerbations, in the ICS initiation cohort. RESULTS The final study included 2,366 Questionnaire cohort patients and 51,404 ICS initiation patients. Agreement between patient-reported and database-recorded exacerbations was fair (kappa 0.35). Following the initiation of ICS, database risk domain asthma control (based on exacerbations) improved (proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma decreased from 24.9% to 18.6%; P<0.001) and mean number of database exacerbations decreased from 0.09 to 0.08 per patient per year (P=0.001). However, another measure of asthma control which includes short-acting beta-agonist prescription as part of the definition did not show this improvement. Patients with prior exacerbations had a higher risk of future exacerbation (rate ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.23 [3.03-3.57]). CONCLUSION Asthma control and exacerbations derived from primary care databases were responsive, with the exception of short-acting beta-agonist prescriptions, and useful for risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gene Colice
- Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | - Alexandra L Dima
- Health Services and Performance Research EA 7425 HESPER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Helen K Reddel
- Clinical Management Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Annie Burden
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Richard J Martin
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Todor A Popov
- Department Allergology, University Hospital "Sv. Ivan Rilski", Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore,
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kuršumović A, Rath SA. Effectiveness of an annular closure device in a "real-world" population: stratification of registry data using screening criteria from a randomized controlled trial. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2018; 11:193-200. [PMID: 29922099 PMCID: PMC5995288 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s167381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Increased focus has been put on the use of “‘real-world” data to support randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence for clinical decision-making. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of an annular closure device (ACD) after stratifying a consecutive series of “real-world” patients by the screening criteria of an ongoing RCT. Materials and methods This was a single-center registry analysis of 164 subjects who underwent limited discectomy combined with ACD for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Patients were stratified into two groups using the selection criteria of a pivotal RCT on the same device: Trial (met inclusion; n=44) or non-Trial (did not meet inclusion; n=120). Patient-reported outcomes, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and adverse events were collected from baseline to last follow-up (mean: Trial – 15.6 months; non-Trial – 14.6 months). Statistical analyses were performed with significance set at p<0.05. Results Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between groups at last (p≥0.15) and clinical success (≥15-point improvement in ODI score; ≥20-point improvement in VAS scores) was achieved in both the groups. Three non-Trial (2.5%) and three Trial (6.8%) patients experienced symptomatic reherniation (p=0.34). Rates of reoperation, ACD mesh dislocation/separation, and other radiographic findings were similar between groups (p=1.00). Conclusion Outcomes with the ACD appeared advantageous in both the groups, particularly in comparison with historical reherniation rates reported in the same high-risk, large annular defect population. Stratification of this “real-world” series on the basis of RCT screening criteria did not result in significant between-group differences. These findings suggest that the efficacy of the ACD extends beyond the strictly defined patient population being studied in the RCT of this device. Furthermore, reducing the reherniation rate following lumbar discectomy has positive clinical and economic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adisa Kuršumović
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spinal Surgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Stefan A Rath
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spinal Surgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Peer-review publication is a critical step to the translation and dissemination of research results into clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessment (HTA) and payment policies, and clinical care. The objective of this study was to examine current views of journal editors regarding: (i) The value of real-world evidence (RWE) and how it compares with other types of studies; (ii) Education and/or resources journal editors provide to their peer reviewers or perceive as needed for authors, reviewers, and editors related to RWE. METHODS Journal editors' views on the value of RWE and editorial procedures for RWE manuscripts were obtained through telephone interviews, a survey, and in-person, roundtable discussion. RESULTS In total, seventy-nine journals were approached, resulting in fifteen telephone interviews, seventeen survey responses and eight roundtable participants. RWE was considered valuable by all interviewed editors (n = 15). Characteristics of high-quality RWE manuscripts included: novelty/relevance, rigorous methodology, and alignment of data to research question. Editors experience challenges finding peer reviewers; however, these challenges persist across all study designs. Journals generally do not provide guidance, assistance, or training for reviewers, including for RWE studies. Health policy/health services research (HSR) editors were more likely than specialty or general medicine editors to participate in this study, potentially indicating that HSR researchers are more comfortable/interested in RWE. CONCLUSIONS Editors report favorable views of RWE studies provided studies examine important questions and are methodologically rigorous. Improving peer-review processes across all study designs, has the potential to improve the evidence base for decision making, including HTA.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali SA, Kloseck M, Lee K, Walsh KE, MacDermid JC, Fitzsimmons D. Evaluating the design and reporting of pragmatic trials in osteoarthritis research. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018; 57:59-63. [PMID: 28371879 PMCID: PMC5850497 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Among the challenges in health research is translating interventions from controlled experimental settings to clinical and community settings where chronic disease is managed daily. Pragmatic trials offer a method for testing interventions in real-world settings but are seldom used in OA research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the literature on pragmatic trials in OA research up to August 2016 in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in the design and reporting of these trials. Methods We used established guidelines to assess the degree to which 61 OA studies complied with pragmatic trial design and reporting. We assessed design according to the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary and reporting according to the pragmatic trials extension of the CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Results None of the pragmatic trials met all 11 criteria evaluated and most of the trials met between 5 and 8 of the criteria. Criteria most often unmet pertained to practitioner expertise (by requiring specialists) and criteria most often met pertained to primary outcome analysis (by using intention-to-treat analysis). Conclusion Our results suggest a lack of highly pragmatic trials in OA research. We identify this as a point of opportunity to improve research translation, since optimizing the design and reporting of pragmatic trials can facilitate implementation of evidence-based interventions for OA care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Joy C MacDermid
- Faculty of Health Sciences
- Hand and Upper Limb Centre Clinical Research Laboratory, St. Joseph’s Health Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Deborah Fitzsimmons
- Faculty of Health Sciences
- School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Burden A, Roche N, Miglio C, Hillyer EV, Postma DS, Herings RM, Overbeek JA, Khalid JM, van Eickels D, Price DB. An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Pragmat Obs Res 2017; 8:15-30. [PMID: 28356782 PMCID: PMC5367458 DOI: 10.2147/por.s122563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cohort matching and regression modeling are used in observational studies to control for confounding factors when estimating treatment effects. Our objective was to evaluate exact matching and propensity score methods by applying them in a 1-year pre–post historical database study to investigate asthma-related outcomes by treatment. Methods We drew on longitudinal medical record data in the PHARMO database for asthma patients prescribed the treatments to be compared (ciclesonide and fine-particle inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]). Propensity score methods that we evaluated were propensity score matching (PSM) using two different algorithms, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), covariate adjustment using the propensity score, and propensity score stratification. We defined balance, using standardized differences, as differences of <10% between cohorts. Results Of 4064 eligible patients, 1382 (34%) were prescribed ciclesonide and 2682 (66%) fine-particle ICS. The IPTW and propensity score-based methods retained more patients (96%–100%) than exact matching (90%); exact matching selected less severe patients. Standardized differences were >10% for four variables in the exact-matched dataset and <10% for both PSM algorithms and the weighted pseudo-dataset used in the IPTW method. With all methods, ciclesonide was associated with better 1-year asthma-related outcomes, at one-third the prescribed dose, than fine-particle ICS; results varied slightly by method, but direction and statistical significance remained the same. Conclusion We found that each method has its particular strengths, and we recommend at least two methods be applied for each matched cohort study to evaluate the robustness of the findings. Balance diagnostics should be applied with all methods to check the balance of confounders between treatment cohorts. If exact matching is used, the calculation of a propensity score could be useful to identify variables that require balancing, thereby informing the choice of matching criteria together with clinical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Burden
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Nicolas Roche
- University Paris Descartes (EA2511), Cochin Hospital Group (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Cristiana Miglio
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | | | - Dirkje S Postma
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - Ron Mc Herings
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrech, the Netherlands
| | - Jetty A Overbeek
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrech, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore; Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Guilbert TW, Colice G, Grigg J, van Aalderen W, Martin RJ, Israel E, Postma DS, Roche N, Phipatanakul W, Hillyer EV, Evans JM, Dolovich MB, Price DB. Real-Life Outcomes for Patients with Asthma Prescribed Spacers for Use with Either Extrafine- or Fine-Particle Inhaled Corticosteroids. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:1040-1049.e4. [PMID: 28110057 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spacers are often used with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) to eliminate the need for coordinating inhalation with actuation. OBJECTIVE To investigate the real-life effectiveness of spacers prescribed for use with either extrafine- or fine-particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). METHODS This historical matched cohort study examined anonymous medical record data over 2 years (1-year baseline, 1-year outcome) for patients with asthma aged 12 to 80 years initiating ICSs by pMDI with or without prescribed spacer. We compared outcomes for spacer versus no-spacer arms, matched for key baseline and asthma-related characteristics, within 2 ICS cohorts: (1) extrafine-particle ICS (beclomethasone) and (2) fine-particle ICS (fluticasone). Effectiveness end points were compared using conditional regression methods. RESULTS Matched spacer and no-spacer arms of the extrafine-particle ICS cohort each included 2090 patients (69% females; median age, 46-47 years) and the 2 arms of the fine-particle ICS cohort each included 444 patients (67% females; median age, 45 years). With extrafine-particle ICS, we observed no significant difference between spacer and no-spacer arms in severe exacerbation rate (primary end point): adjusted rate ratio, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.83-1.23). With fine-particle ICS, the severe exacerbation rate ratio with spacers was 0.77 (0.47-1.25). Oropharyngeal candidiasis incidence was low and similar in spacer and no-spacer arms for both ICS cohorts. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that prescribed spacer devices are associated with improved asthma outcomes for extrafine- or fine-particle ICS administered by pMDI. These findings challenge long-standing assumptions that spacers should improve pMDI effectiveness and indicate the need for pragmatic trials of spacers in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gene Colice
- Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md
| | - Jonathan Grigg
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wim van Aalderen
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Richard J Martin
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colo
| | - Elliot Israel
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Dirkje S Postma
- University of Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Cochin Hospital Group, AP-HP, University of Paris Descartes (EA2511), Paris, France
| | | | | | - Jennifer M Evans
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Myrna B Dolovich
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore; Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Postma DS, Dekhuijzen R, van der Molen T, Martin RJ, van Aalderen W, Roche N, Guilbert TW, Israel E, van Eickels D, Khalid JM, Herings RMC, Overbeek JA, Miglio C, Thomas V, Hutton C, Hillyer EV, Price DB. Asthma-Related Outcomes in Patients Initiating Extrafine Ciclesonide or Fine-Particle Inhaled Corticosteroids. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2017; 9:116-125. [PMID: 28102056 PMCID: PMC5266109 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.2.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Extrafine-particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have greater small airway deposition than standard fine-particle ICS. We sought to compare asthma-related outcomes after patients initiated extrafine-particle ciclesonide or fine-particle ICS (fluticasone propionate or non-extrafine beclomethasone). Methods This historical, matched cohort study included patients aged 12-60 years prescribed their first ICS as ciclesonide or fine-particle ICS. The 2 cohorts were matched 1:1 for key demographic and clinical characteristics over the baseline year. Co-primary endpoints were 1-year severe exacerbation rates, risk-domain asthma control, and overall asthma control; secondary endpoints included therapy change. Results Each cohort included 1,244 patients (median age 45 years; 65% women). Patients in the ciclesonide cohort were comparable to those in the fine-particle ICS cohort apart from higher baseline prevalence of hospitalization, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and rhinitis. Median (interquartile range) prescribed doses of ciclesonide and fine-particle ICS were 160 (160-160) µg/day and 500 (250-500) µg/day, respectively (P<0.001). During the outcome year, patients prescribed ciclesonide experienced lower severe exacerbation rates (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI], 0.69 [0.53-0.89]), and higher odds of risk-domain asthma control (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 1.62 [1.27-2.06]) and of overall asthma control (2.08 [1.68-2.57]) than those prescribed fine-particle ICS. The odds of therapy change were 0.70 (0.59-0.83) with ciclesonide. Conclusions In this matched cohort analysis, we observed that initiation of ICS with ciclesonide was associated with better 1-year asthma outcomes and fewer changes to therapy, despite data suggesting more difficult-to-control asthma. The median prescribed dose of ciclesonide was one-third that of fine-particle ICS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirkje S Postma
- University of Groningen, Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thys van der Molen
- University of Groningen, Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard J Martin
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Roche
- University Paris Descartes (EA2511), Cochin Hospital Group (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | | | - Elliot Israel
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ron M C Herings
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David B Price
- Research in Real Life, Cambridge, UK.,Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bosnic-Anticevich S, Chrystyn H, Costello RW, Dolovich MB, Fletcher MJ, Lavorini F, Rodríguez-Roisin R, Ryan D, Wan Yau Ming S, Price DB. The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 12:59-71. [PMID: 28053517 PMCID: PMC5191843 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s117196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques. Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique. Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known. AIMS To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques. METHODS A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a "similar-devices cohort" and a "mixed-devices cohort". COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts. A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA). RESULTS The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57% males, 37% current smokers). Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.51-0.57). CONCLUSION COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Henry Chrystyn
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Richard W Costello
- RCSI Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons; RCSI Education & Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Myrna B Dolovich
- Department of Medicine, Respirology, McMaster University, ON, Canada
| | | | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge; Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| | | | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd, Singapore; Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Marcello C, Carlo L. Asthma phenotypes: the intriguing selective intervention with Montelukast. Asthma Res Pract 2016; 2:11. [PMID: 27965779 PMCID: PMC5142440 DOI: 10.1186/s40733-016-0026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation and a variable course associated with various underlying mechanisms that can differ between individuals. Patients with asthma can therefore exhibit different phenotypes, a term used to define the observable characteristics of an organism resulting from the interaction between its genetic makeup and the environment. The heterogeneity of asthma has received a large amount of attention in the last few years in order to better tailor treatment according to the different clinical and biological phenotypes of the disease. Specific asthma phenotypes may require an approach to treatment sometimes different from that recommended by current guidelines, so a personalized approach to asthma pharmacotherapy is recommended. Growing evidence suggests that leukotrienes play an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. The mechanisms of action of leukotriene-receptor antagonists theoretically predict a good response in some asthma “phenotypes”.In this article we have performed an analysis of the recent literature (controlled clinical trials and real-life studies) about a possible selective intervention with Montelukast in specific asthma phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lombardi Carlo
- Departmental Unit of Allergology, Immunology & Pulmonary Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, 57, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Roche N, Colice G, Israel E, Martin RJ, Dorinsky PM, Postma DS, Guilbert TW, Grigg J, van Aalderen WMC, Barion F, Hillyer EV, Thomas V, Burden A, Brett McQueen R, Price DB. Cost-Effectiveness of Asthma Step-Up Therapy as an Increased Dose of Extrafine-Particle Inhaled Corticosteroid or Add-On Long-Acting Beta2-Agonist. Pulm Ther 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s41030-016-0014-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
36
|
Type-2 diabetes primary prevention program implemented in routine primary care: a process evaluation study. Trials 2016; 17:254. [PMID: 27206733 PMCID: PMC4875717 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1379-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Process evaluation studies are recommended to improve our understanding of underlying mechanisms related to clinicians, patients, context and intervention delivery that may impact on trial or program results and on their potential transferability to practice. This paper aims to document the translation of a type-2 diabetes (T2D) prevention program into the routine context of several primary care centers, assessing process indicators related to clinician adoption, patient recruitment, exposure to the intervention components and baseline characteristics. Methods An observational descriptive process evaluation study was conducted of the 2.5-year implementation of the Prevention of Diabetes in Euskadi cluster randomized trial in 14 primary care centers of the Basque Health Service (Osakidetza). The clinical intervention consisted of three components: (1) risk screening, (2) an educational intervention promoting healthy lifestyles, and (3) remote support (follow-up). A passive dissemination strategy of providing training and materials was used to translate the intervention into practice. All non-diabetic patients aged 45 to 70 years who were identified as being at high risk of developing T2D were eligible for study inclusion. The RE-AIM framework guided the process evaluation. Results Overall, 31.4 % of family physicians and 57.6 % of nurses participated in the study, while 4170 out of 67,293 (6.2 %) targeted patients who attended the centers during the implementation period were reached through the screening. Around half of the screened patients were identified as being at high risk of developing T2D (FINDRISC score ≥14). The rate of refusal to participate and the proportion of women were higher in the intervention group. Finally, 634 and 454 non-diabetic 45- to 70-year-old patients who were at high risk of T2D were included in the control and intervention group centers (intervention reach = 48 %). Significant variability in most process indicators was observed at center level. Conclusion The passive dissemination strategy has produced modest process indicators related to the adoption, reach and implementation of the intervention program, and reduced the possibility of its standardized application in heterogeneous contexts. The resulting different procedures and strategies used by the centers were associated with process outcomes. Context-specific variability and possible confounding will require rigorous procedures for analysis of the intervention effects. Trial registration The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01365013). Registered on June 2011. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1379-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bosnic-Anticevich SZ. Asthma management in primary care: caring, sharing and working together. Eur Respir J 2016; 47:1043-6. [DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00240-2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
38
|
Klimek L, Demoly P, Price D. Effectiveness of allergic rhinitis treatments in real-life with a focus on MP-AzeFlu. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2016; 9:705-14. [PMID: 26839083 DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2016.1148598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
For any allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment, it is crucial to provide evidence not only of efficacy (assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) but also of effectiveness in real-life. Observational studies provide valuable data on the use and results associated with interventions prescribed in real-life. However, real-life evidence supporting available AR treatment options is sparse with effectiveness only established for oral antihistamines (desloratadine, ebastine), intranasal corticosteroids (mometasone furoate, fluticasone propionate (FP)), allergen immunotherapy and omalizumab. A novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and FP in a single spray (MP-AzeFlu) shows great promise, with the effectiveness observed in real-life exceeding that noted in RCTs. This review summarises real-life data on MP-AzeFlu, which provides rapid and sustained symptom control irrespective of patient age, AR phenotype or disease severity. We call for high quality real-life research in addition to RCTs to inform future AR treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Klimek
- a Center for Rhinology and Allergology , Wiesbaden , Germany
| | - Pascal Demoly
- b Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie , University Hospital of Montpellier , Montpellier , France
| | - David Price
- c Division of Applied Health Sciences , University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
One-Legged Cycle Training for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Pragmatic Study of Implementation to Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12:1490-7. [DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201504-231oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
40
|
Price D, Smith P, Hellings P, Papadopoulos N, Fokkens W, Muraro A, Murray R, Chisholm A, Demoly P, Scadding G, Mullol J, Lieberman P, Bachert C, Mösges R, Ryan D, Bousquet J. Current controversies and challenges in allergic rhinitis management. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 11:1205-17. [PMID: 26325631 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2015.1081814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
There are many obstacles in the path of effective allergy management, in general, and allergic rhinitis (AR) control, in particular. Chief among them are: insufficient symptom relief in some patients provided by some currently considered first-line AR treatments in real life; an over-reliance on randomized controlled trials to direct AR guideline recommendations; the need for a broader interpretation of the AR evidence base (to include randomized controlled trials and real-life studies); poorly designed and interpreted studies; and lack of an AR control concept and common language of control. These controversies are fully reviewed here and challenging solutions have been presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- a 1 Research in Real Life, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pete Smith
- b 2 Department of Clinical Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Peter Hellings
- c 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nikos Papadopoulos
- d 4 Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Wytske Fokkens
- e 5 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center (AMC) Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antonella Muraro
- f 6 Food Allergy Referral Centre, Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Ruth Murray
- g 7 Medscript (Scientific & Medical Affairs), Dundalk, Ireland
| | | | - Pascal Demoly
- i 9 Department of Pulmonology - Division of Allergy, University Hospital of Montpellier, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, France
| | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- k 11 Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Phil Lieberman
- l 12 University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis, USA
| | - Claus Bachert
- m 13 Upper Airways Research Laboratory (URL), University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ralph Mösges
- n 14 Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dermot Ryan
- o 15 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jean Bousquet
- p 16 University Hospital, Montpellier, France.,q 17 MACVIA-LR, Contre les Maladies Chronique spour un Vieillissement Actif en Languedoc Roussilon, European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site, France.,r 18 INSERM, VIMA: Ageing and chronic diseases. Epidemiological and public health approaches, U1168, Paris, and UVSQ, UMR-S 1168, Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Aalderen WMC, Grigg J, Guilbert TW, Roche N, Israel E, Martin RJ, Colice G, Postma DS, Hillyer EV, Burden A, Thomas V, von Ziegenweidt J, Price D. Small-particle Inhaled Corticosteroid as First-line or Step-up Controller Therapy in Childhood Asthma. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2015; 3:721-31.e16. [PMID: 26032474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Revised: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because randomized controlled trials of established pediatric asthma therapies are expensive and difficult to perform, observational studies may fill gaps in the evidence base. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of representative small-particle inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with that of standard size-particle ICS for children initiating or stepping up ICS therapy for asthma (analysis 1) and to compare the effectiveness of ICS dose step-up using small-particle ICS with adding long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) to the ICS (analysis 2). METHODS These historical matched cohort analyses drew on electronic medical records of children with asthma aged 5 to 11 years. Variables measured during 2 consecutive years (1 baseline year for confounder definition and 1 outcome year) included risk-domain asthma control (no hospital attendance for asthma, acute oral corticosteroids, or lower respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotics) and rate of severe exacerbations (asthma-related emergency, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroids). RESULTS In the initiation population (n = 797 in each cohort), children prescribed small-particle ICS versus standard size-particle ICS experienced greater odds of asthma control (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.02) and lower severe exacerbation rate (adjusted rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88). Step-up outcomes (n = 206 in each cohort) were also significantly better for small-particle ICS, with asthma control adjusted odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI, 1.23-4.03) and exacerbations adjusted rate ratio of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.89). The number needed to treat with small-particle ICS to achieve 1 additional child with asthma control was 17 (95% CI, 9-107) for the initiation population and 5 (95% CI, 3-78) for the step-up population. Outcomes were not significantly different for stepped-up small-particle ICS dose versus ICS/LABA combination (n = 185 in each cohort). CONCLUSIONS Initiating or stepping up the ICS dose with small-particle ICS rather than with standard size-particle ICS is more effective and shows similar effectiveness to add-on LABA in childhood asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem M C van Aalderen
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Grigg
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | - Nicolas Roche
- Cochin Hospital Group, AP-HP, University of Paris Descartes (EA2511), Paris, France
| | - Elliot Israel
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Richard J Martin
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colo
| | - Gene Colice
- Washington Hospital Center and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Dirkje S Postma
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - David Price
- Research in Real Life, Ltd, Cambridge, UK; Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Battaglia S, Basile M, Spatafora M, Scichilone N. Are asthmatics enrolled in randomized trials representative of real-life outpatients? Respiration 2015; 89:383-9. [PMID: 25791779 DOI: 10.1159/000375314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study was aimed at exploring to what extent populations enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of inhalation combination treatment for mild/moderate asthma in adults are fully representative of 'real-life' populations. The following is a retrospective analysis of the clinical records of outpatient subjects with an ascertained diagnosis of asthma. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed. Stable conditions, such as smoking habit and chronic diseases other than asthma, were identified as exclusion criteria for RCTs. The selected criteria were then applied to asthmatic outpatients, yielding a population that was potentially eligible for RCTs. RESULTS Out of 1,909 subjects, 824 (43.2%) met at least one of the exclusion criteria for RCTs. Cigarette smoking (occurring in 34.3% of the entire population), lung diseases other than asthma (5.0%), anxiety and depression (3.3%), arrhythmias (2.3%), and coronary artery disease (1.2%) would have been the most frequent causes for exclusion from RCTs. The proportion of patients excluded from RCTs appears to increase with age, reaching 57.1% in patients aged >85 years. CONCLUSIONS In a real-life setting, >40% of subjects with mild/moderate asthma are currently treated by protocols based on the results of RCTs for which they would not have been eligible. This proportion increases in elderly patients with comorbidities. These findings limit the generalizability of RCTs and advocate that complementary pragmatic studies be conducted. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Battaglia
- Sezione di Malattie Cardio-Respiratorie ed Endocrino-Metaboliche, Dipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Seshia SS, Makhinson M, Young GB. Evidence-informed person-centred health care (part II): are 'cognitive biases plus' underlying the EBM paradigm responsible for undermining the quality of evidence? J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20:748-58. [PMID: 25494630 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently, some leaders of the evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement drew attention to the "unintended" negative consequences associated with EBM. The term 'cognitive biases plus' was introduced in part I to encompass cognitive biases, conflicts of interests, fallacies and certain behaviours. HYPOTHESIS 'Cognitive biases plus' in those closely involved in creating and promoting the EBM paradigm are responsible for their (1) inability to anticipate and then recognize flaws in the tenets of EBM; (2) discounting alternative views; and (3) delaying reform. METHODS A narrative review style was used, with methods as in part I. APPRAISAL OF LITERATURE Over the past two decades there has been mounting qualitative and quantitative methodological evidence to suggest that the faith placed in (1) the EBM hierarchy with randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews at the summit; (2) the reliability of biostatistical methods to quantitate data; and (3) the primacy of sources of pre-appraised evidence, is seriously misplaced. Consequently, the evidence that informs person-centred care is compromised. DISCUSSION Arguments focusing on 'cognitive biases plus' are offered to support our hypothesis. To the best of our knowledge, EBM proponents have not provided an explanation. CONCLUSIONS Reform is urgently needed to minimize continuing risks to patients. If our hypothesis is correct, then in addition to the suggestions made in part I, deficiencies in the paradigm must be corrected. Meaningful solutions are only possible if the biases of scientific inbreeding and groupthink are minimized by collaboration between EBM leaders and those who have been sounding warning bells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashi S Seshia
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Postma DS, Roche N, Colice G, Israel E, Martin RJ, van Aalderen WM, Grigg J, Burden A, Hillyer EV, von Ziegenweidt J, Gopalan G, Price D. Comparing the effectiveness of small-particle versus large-particle inhaled corticosteroid in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014; 9:1163-86. [PMID: 25378918 PMCID: PMC4207569 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s68289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Small airway changes and dysfunction contribute importantly to airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is currently treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting bronchodilators at Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 2–4. This retrospective matched cohort analysis compared effectiveness of a representative small-particle ICS (extrafine beclomethasone) and larger-particle ICS (fluticasone) in primary care patients with COPD. Patients and methods Smokers and ex-smokers with COPD ≥40 years old initiating or stepping-up their dose of extrafine beclomethasone or fluticasone were matched 1:1 for demographic characteristics, index prescription year, concomitant therapies, and disease severity during 1 baseline year. During 2 subsequent years, we evaluated treatment change and COPD exacerbations, defined as emergency care/hospitalization for COPD, acute oral corticosteroids, or antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection. Results Mean patient age was 67 years, 57%–60% being male. For both initiation (n=334:334) and step-up (n=189:189) patients, exacerbation rates were comparable between extrafine beclomethasone and fluticasone cohorts during the 2 year outcome period. Odds of treatment stability (no exacerbation or treatment change) were significantly greater for patients initiating extrafine beclomethasone compared with fluticasone (adjusted odds ratio 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–4.73). Median ICS dose exposure during 2 outcome years was significantly lower (P<0.001) for extrafine beclomethasone than fluticasone cohorts (315 μg/day versus 436 μg/day for initiation, 438 μg/day versus 534 μg/day for step-up patients). Conclusion We observed that small-particle ICS at significantly lower doses had comparable effects on exacerbation rates as larger-particle ICS at higher doses, whereas initiation of small-particle ICS was associated with better odds of treatment stability during 2-years’ follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirkje S Postma
- University of Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Cochin Hospital Group, APHP, Paris-Descartes University (EA2511), Paris, France
| | - Gene Colice
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Respiratory Services, Washington Hospital Center and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
| | - Elliot Israel
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Willem Mc van Aalderen
- Dept of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Grigg
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Gokul Gopalan
- Respiratory, Global Scientific Affairs, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Frazer, PA, USA
| | - David Price
- Research in Real Life, Ltd, Cambridge, UK ; Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Price D, Hillyer EV. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate in fixed-dose combination for the treatment of asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2014; 8:275-91. [PMID: 24802285 DOI: 10.1586/17476348.2014.905914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
A new combination inhaler containing fluticasone, a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and formoterol, a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) with rapid onset and sustained bronchodilator effect, has been approved for treatment of persistent asthma in patients ≥12 years of age requiring combination ICS-LABA therapy. The fluticasone/formoterol combination, delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and available in three dose strengths, has demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile in trials of up to 1 year. The efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol is greater than that of fluticasone or formoterol alone and noninferior to that of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol in tightly controlled 8-12-week clinical trials. Advantages of the fluticasone/formoterol combination aerosol include rapid onset of bronchodilation, an attribute preferred by patients, and emission of a high fine-particle fraction that is consistent at different flow rates, which may aid consistency of delivery (given patient variability in inhalation maneuvers) and provide real-life benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|