Reassessment of Home Oxygen Prescription after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Potential Target for Deimplementation

Supplemental Oxygen Use, Outcomes, and Spending in Patients With COPD in the Medicare Competitive Bidding Program

Importance

The Medicare Competitive Bidding Program (CBP), a policy that reduced durable medical equipment prices, was implemented starting in 2011. Legislation introduced in 2024 aims to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP because of concerns that recent decreases in oxygen prescribing are due to lower prices set by the CBP, which may have decreased supply and, in turn, limited oxygen access for patients with chronic lung diseases. However, low-value prescribing of oxygen is also prevalent in practice, and decreased oxygen prescription rates may not have necessarily caused harm. Little is known about the association of the CBP with patient use, outcomes, or spending.

Objective

To examine the association between the 2011 and 2013 implementation of the CBP and supplemental oxygen use, clinical outcomes, and supplemental oxygen spending among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the association between implementation of the CBP and the outcomes of interest. Patients aged 65 to 100 years with COPD living in CBP areas were compared with those living in areas where the CBP was not yet or never implemented. The study included 100% fee-for-service Medicare data of beneficiaries enrolled between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015. The data analysis was performed between June 6, 2023, and August 16, 2024.

Exposure

The 2011 and 2013 implementation cycles of the Medicare CBP.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were new prescriptions of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD and discontinuation of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD previously prescribed oxygen. Secondary outcomes included switches between oxygen types (gas, liquid, or concentrator), all-cause mortality, all-cause unplanned hospitalizations, COPD hospitalizations, and mean monthly allowed charges (total spending) over a 6-month period. The analysis was performed using the Callaway-Sant'Anna method, a dynamic DID model for policies with staggered implementation.

Results

Among 5 753 308 Medicare beneficiaries with COPD (mean [SD] age, 79.2 [8.4] years; 55.1% female), 25.9% received supplemental oxygen for at least one 6-month period during the study. The CBP was not associated with differential changes in new oxygen prescribing (DID estimate, -0.19 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.45 to 2.08 percentage points) or oxygen discontinuations (DID estimate, -0.77 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.15 to 6.60 percentage points). Similarly, differential changes were not observed in the secondary outcomes of oxygen switches (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.37 percentage points), all-cause mortality (DID estimate, 0.16 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.52 to 7.84 percentage points), all-cause unplanned hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.20 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.94 to 10.53 percentage points), or COPD hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.57 to 2.48 percentage points). Differential changes were observed for mean monthly allowed charges (DID estimate, -$326.22; 95% CI, -$434.76 to -$217.68).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, among beneficiaries with COPD, the Medicare CBP was associated with differentially lower spending but not differential changes in oxygen use or clinical outcomes. This study did not find evidence supporting ongoing policy efforts to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP.

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand clinical practice guideline on adult home oxygen therapy

This Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand Guideline on the provision of home oxygen therapy in adults updates a previous Guideline from 2015. The Guideline is based upon a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature to September 2022 and the strength of recommendations is based on GRADE methodology. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is recommended for its mortality benefit for patients with COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases who have consistent evidence of significant hypoxaemia at rest (PaO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or PaO2 ≤59 mm Hg in the presence of hypoxaemic sequalae) while in a stable state. Evidence does not support the use of LTOT for patients with COPD who have moderate hypoxaemia or isolated nocturnal hypoxaemia. In the absence of hypoxaemia, there is no evidence that oxygen provides greater palliation of breathlessness than air. Evidence does not support the use of supplemental oxygen therapy during pulmonary rehabilitation in those with COPD and exertional desaturation but normal resting arterial blood gases. Both positive and negative effects of LTOT have been described, including on quality of life. Education about how and when to use oxygen therapy in order to maximize its benefits, including the use of different delivery devices, expectations and limitations of therapy and information about hazards and risks associated with its use are key when embarking upon this treatment.

The benefits and drawbacks of home oxygen therapy for COPD: what's next?

INTRODUCTION

Home oxygen therapy is one of the few interventions that can improve survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered appropriately, although it may cause side effects and be an unnecessary burden for some patients.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes the current literature on the assessment of hypoxemia, different types of home oxygen therapy, potential beneficial and adverse effects, and emerging research on home oxygen therapy in COPD. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE up to January 2024, with additional articles being identified through clinical guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Hypoxemia is common in patients with more severe COPD. Long-term oxygen therapy is established to prolong survival in patients with chronic severe resting hypoxemia. Conversely, in the absence of chronic severe resting hypoxemia, home oxygen therapy has an unclear or conflicting evidence base, including for palliation of breathlessness, and is generally not recommended. However, beneficial effects in some patients cannot be precluded. Evidence is emerging on the optimal daily duration of oxygen use, the role of high-flow and auto-titrated oxygen therapy, improved informed decision-making, and telemonitoring. Further research is needed to validate novel oxygen delivery systems and monitoring tools and establish long-term effects of ambulatory oxygen therapy in COPD.

The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Quality has been a persistent challenge in the healthcare system, particularly in resource-limited settings. As a result, the utilization of innovative approaches is required to help countries in their efforts to enhance the quality of healthcare. The positive deviance (PD) approach is an innovative approach that can be utilized to improve healthcare quality. The approach assumes that solutions to problems are already available within the community and identifying and sharing those solutions can help others to resolve existing issues. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the use of the PD approach in healthcare system service delivery and quality improvement programs.

METHODS

Articles were retrieved from six international databases. The last date for article search was June 02, 2023, and no date restriction was applied. All articles were assessed for inclusion through a title and/or abstract read. Then, articles that passed the title and abstract review were screened by reading their full texts. In case of duplication, only the full-text published articles were retained. A descriptive mapping and evidence synthesis was done to present data with the guide of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and the results are presented in text, table, and figure formats.

RESULTS

A total of 125 articles were included in this scoping review. More than half, 66 (52.8%), of the articles were from the United States, 11(8.8%) from multinational studies, 10 (8%) from Canada, 8 (6.4%) from the United Kingdom and the remaining, 30 (24%) are from other nations around the world. The scoping review indicates that several types of study designs can be applied in utilizing the PD approach for healthcare service and quality improvement programs. However, although validated performance measures are utilized to identify positive deviants (PDs) in many of the articles, some of the selection criteria utilized by authors lack clarity and are subject to potential bias. In addition, several limitations have been mentioned in the articles including issues in operationalizing PD, focus on leaders and senior managers and limited staff involvement, bias, lack of comparison, limited setting, and issues in generalizability/transferability of results from prospects perspective. Nevertheless, the limitations identified are potentially manageable and can be contextually resolved depending on the nature of the study. Furthermore, PD has been successfully employed in healthcare service and quality improvement programs including in increasing surgical care quality, hand hygiene practice, and reducing healthcare-associated infections.

CONCLUSION

The scoping review findings have indicated that healthcare systems have been able to enhance quality, reduce errors, and improve patient outcomes by identifying lessons from those who exhibit exceptional practices and implementing successful strategies in their practice. All the outcomes of PD-based research, however, are dependent on the first step of identifying true PDs. Hence, it is critical that PDs are identified using objective and validated measures of performance as failure to identify true PDs can subsequently lead to failure in identifying best practices for learning and dissemination to other contextually similar settings.

Home Oxygen After Hospitalization for COVID-19: Results From the Multi-Center OXFORD Study

BACKGROUND

In the first months of the pandemic, prior to the introduction of proven-effective treatments, 15-37% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were discharged on home oxygen. After proven-effective treatments for acute COVID-19 were established by evidence-based guidelines, little remains known about home oxygen requirements following hospitalization for COVID-19.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of subjects hospitalized for COVID-19 between October 2020-September 2021 at 3 academic health centers. Information was abstracted from electronic health records at the index hospitalization and for 60 d after discharge. The World Health Organization COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale score was used to identify patients with severe COVID-19.

RESULTS

Of 517 subjects (mean age 58 y, 47% female, 42% Black, 36% Hispanic, 22% with severe COVID-19), 81% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 61% with remdesivir, and 2.5% with tocilizumab. About one quarter of subjects were discharged on home oxygen (26% [95% CI 22-29]). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02 per 5 y [95% CI 1.02-1.02]), higher body mass index (aOR 1.02 per kg/m2 [1.00-1.04]), diabetes (yes vs no, aOR 1.73 [1.46-2.02]), severe COVID-19 (vs moderate, aOR 3.19 [2.19-4.64]), and treatment with systemic corticosteroids (yes vs no, aOR 30.63 [4.51-208.17]) were associated with an increased odds of discharge on home oxygen. Comorbid hypertension (yes vs no, aOR 0.71 [0.66-0.77) was associated with a decreased odds of home oxygen. Within 60 d of hospital discharge, 50% had documentation of pulse oximetry; in this group, home oxygen was discontinued in 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

About one in 4 subjects were prescribed home oxygen after hospitalization for COVID-19, even after guidelines established proven-effective treatments for acute illness. Evidence-based strategies to reduce the requirement for home oxygen in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 are needed.

Phenotypes, Etiotypes, and Endotypes of Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major health problem with a high prevalence, a rising incidence, and substantial morbidity and mortality. Its course is punctuated by acute episodes of increased respiratory symptoms, termed exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD). ECOPD are important events in the natural history of the disease, as they are associated with lung function decline and prolonged negative effects on quality of life. The present-day therapy for ECOPD with short courses of antibiotics and steroids and escalation of bronchodilators has resulted in only modest improvements in outcomes. Recent data indicate that ECOPD are heterogeneous, raising the need to identify distinct etioendophenotypes, incorporating traits of the acute event and of patients who experience recurrent events, to develop novel and targeted therapies. These characterizations can provide a complete clinical picture, the severity of which will dictate acute pharmacological treatment, and may also indicate whether a change in maintenance therapy is needed to reduce the risk of future exacerbations. In this review we discuss the latest knowledge of ECOPD types on the basis of clinical presentation, etiology, natural history, frequency, severity, and biomarkers in an attempt to characterize these events.

Clinical Practices Surrounding the Prescription of Home Oxygen in Patients With COPD and Desaturation

Purpose

While home oxygen therapy increases survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have severe resting hypoxemia, recent evidence suggests that there is no survival benefit of home oxygen for patients with COPD who have isolated exertional desaturation. We aimed to understand clinician practice patterns surrounding the prescription of home oxygen for patients with COPD.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews via videoconference with 15 physicians and 3 nurse practitioners who provide care for patients with COPD. Clinicians were recruited through the American Lung Association Airways Clinical Research Centers. Interview guides were created with the assistance of patient investigators and included questions regarding clinician practices surrounding the prescription of oxygen for patients with COPD and the use of clinical guidelines. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes.

Results

Of the 18 clinician interviewees, one-third were women, with most participants (n=11) being < 50 years old. Results of the semi-structured interviews suggested research evidence, clinical experience, and patient preferences contributed to clinician decision-making. Most clinicians described a shared decision-making process for prescribing home oxygen for patients, including discussion of risks and benefits, and developing an understanding of patient values and preferences. Clinicians did not use a structured tool to conduct these conversations.

Conclusions

Clinicians consider a number of patient and clinical factors when prescribing home oxygen therapy, often using a shared decision-making process. Tools to support shared decision-making about the use of home oxygen are needed.

Evaluation of Over-the-Counter Portable Oxygen Concentrators Utilizing a Metabolic Simulator

BACKGROUND

Supplemental oxygen is designed to raise alveolar PO2 to facilitate diffusion into arterial blood. Oxygen is generally delivered by nasal cannula either by continuous or pulsatile flow. Battery-powered portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) facilitate ambulation in patients experiencing exertional hypoxemia. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clears these devices to be sold by physician prescription. Recently, however, lower-cost devices described as POCs have been advertised by online retailers. These devices lack FDA clearance and are obtained over the counter (OTC) without prescription. This study determined whether a selected group of OTC POCs have oxygen delivery characteristics suitable for use by hypoxemic patients.

METHODS

A metabolic simulator, capable of simulating a range of metabolic rates and minute ventilations, determined effects of oxygen supplementation delivered by a variety of devices on alveolar PO2 . Devices tested included 3 OTC POCs, an FDA-cleared POC, and continuous-flow oxygen from a compressed oxygen cylinder. End-tidal PETO2 , a surrogate of alveolar PO2 , was determined at each of each device's flow settings at 3 metabolic rates.

RESULTS

Continuous-flow tank oxygen yielded a linear PETO2 increase as flow increased, with progressively lower slope of increase for higher metabolic rate. The prescription POC device yielded similar PETO2 elevations, though with somewhat smaller elevations in pulse-dose operation. One OTC POC was only technically portable (no on-board battery); it provided only modest PETO2 elevation that failed to increase as flow setting was incremented. A second OTC POC produced only minimal PETO2 elevation. A third OTC POC, a pulsed-dose device, produced meaningful PETO2 increases, though not as great as the prescription device.

CONCLUSIONS

Only one of 3 OTC POCs tested was potentially of use by patients requiring ambulatory oxygen. Physicians and respiratory therapists should inform patients requiring portable oxygen that OTC devices may not meet their oxygenation requirements.

Supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation

The respiratory system attempts to maintain normal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide. However, airflow limitation, parenchymal abnormalities and dysfunction of the respiratory pump may be compromised in individuals with advanced COPD, eventually leading to respiratory failure, with reduced arterial oxygen tension (hypoxaemia) and/or increased arterial carbon dioxide tension (P aCO2 ; hypercapnia). Hypoxaemia may persist in individuals with severe COPD despite smoking cessation and optimisation of pharmacotherapy. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) can improve survival in those with severe daytime hypoxaemia, whereas those with less severe hypoxaemia may only have improved exercise capacity and dyspnoea. Changes in respiratory physiology that occur during sleep further predispose to hypoxaemia, particularly in individuals with COPD. However, the major cause of hypoxaemia is hypoventilation. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may reduce mortality and need for intubation in individuals with COPD and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. However, NIV may also improve survival and quality of life in individuals with stable, chronic hypercapnia and is now suggested for those with prolonged hypercapnia (e.g. P aCO2 >55 mmHg 2-6 weeks after hospital discharge) when clinically stable and after optimisation of medical therapy including LTOT if indicated. Many questions remain about the optimal mode, settings and goal of NIV therapy.

Short-Term Oxygen Therapy Outcomes in COPD

Rationale

Short-term oxygen therapy (STOT) is often prescribed to allow patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to be discharged safely from hospital following an acute illness. This practice is widely accepted without being based on evidence.

Purpose

Our objective was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COPD who received STOT.

Patients and Methods

The study was a secondary analysis of the INOX trial, a 4-year randomised trial of nocturnal oxygen in COPD. The trial indicated that nocturnal oxygen has no significant effect on survival or progression to LTOT, allowing our merging of patients who received nocturnal oxygen and those who received placebo into a single cohort to study the predictors and outcomes of STOT regardless of the treatment received during the trial.

Results

Among the 243 participants in the trial, 60 required STOT on at least one occasion during follow-up. Patients requiring STOT had more severe dyspnoea and lung function impairment, and lower PaO₂ at baseline than those who did not. STOT was associated with subsequent LTOT requirement (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98–7.07) and mortality (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.15–3.24). The association between STOT and mortality was confounded by age, disease severity and comorbidities. Periods of STOT of more than one month and/or repeated prescriptions of STOT increased the probability of progression to LTOT (OR: 5.07; 95% CI: 1.48–18.8).

Conclusion

Following an acute respiratory illness in COPD, persistent hypoxaemia requiring STOT is a marker of disease progression towards the requirement for LTOT.

Association of Patient and Primary Care Provider Factors with Outpatient COPD Care Quality

RATIONALE

Large gaps exist between guideline-recommended outpatient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care and clinical practice. Seeking to design effective interventions, we identified patient and primary care provider (PCP) characteristics associated with receiving evidence-based COPD care.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of adults aged ≥ 40 years with clinically diagnosed COPD who received care at 2 University of Washington-affiliated primary care clinics between June 1, 2011, and June 1, 2013. Our primary outcome was the proportion of evidence-based outpatient COPD quality measures received through primary or pulmonary care. Among all patients, we assessed spirometry completion, respiratory symptom identification, smoking status ascertainment, oxygen saturation measurement, and guideline-concordant inhaled therapy prescription. We also determined confirmation of airflow obstruction, oxygen prescription, smoking cessation intervention, and pulmonary rehabilitation referral if eligible. We used multivariable mixed effects linear regression to estimate the association of patient and PCP characteristics with the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 641 patients, 382 were male (59.6%) with mean age 63.6 (standard deviation [SD] 10.6) years. Most patients currently smoked (N=386, 60.2%). Patients saw 150 unique PCPs during 5.3 (SD 3.2) PCP visits, with 107 completing pulmonary referrals (16.7%). Patients received 67.5% (SD 18.4%) of eligible (median 7 [interquartile range 6-7]) evidence-based quality measures. After adjustment, pulmonary referral was associated with a higher receipt of outpatient quality measures (ß₁17.7%, 95% confidence interval: 12.6%, 22.7%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and PCP identity/characteristics were not associated with outpatient care quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of outpatient COPD care was suboptimal. Future studies should investigate if engaging pulmonologists in COPD management improves care quality.