Differences in Outcomes between Heart Failure Phenotypes in Patients with Coexistent COPD: A Cohort Study

Respiratory Specialist Visits Before Admissions with COPD Exacerbation are Linked to Improved Management and Outcomes

Purpose

Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) significantly impact disease progression and mortality. Visiting a respiratory specialist (RS) in proximity to the exacerbation may lead to prompt treatment and improved outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the association between an RS visit 30-days before admission and exacerbation outcomes.

Patients and methods

The prospective study included subjects that were hospitalized with ECOPD between 2017 and 2019 in 13 medical centers. Pre-admission, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes were assessed and compared between patients with and without a 30-day RS visit, using propensity score matching. A sub-group analysis was performed based on the reason for the RS visit (emergent vs regular follow-up).

Results

Three hundred and forty-four subjects were included, and 105 (31%) had pre-admission RS visit (RS group). Before matching, indicators of severe COPD were prevalent in the RS group, while after matching there were no differences. RS visits were associated with pre-hospital initiation of short acting bronchodilators (50% vs 36%), antibiotics (30% vs 17%), and systemic steroids (38% vs 22%). The RS group had longer duration between first symptoms to hospital arrival (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.01) and shorter hospital length-of-stay (median 4 vs 5 days, p = 0.04). In-hospital and 30-days outcomes were similar between the groups. However, a non-emergent pre-hospital RS visit was associated with improved in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.

Conclusion

Routine RS visits could lead to correct and early treatment for ECOPD with a potential for improved outcomes. These findings highlight the need for available specialists and higher awareness.

A Research Agenda to Improve Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often at risk for or have comorbid cardiovascular disease and are likely to die of cardiovascular-related causes. Objectives: To prioritize a list of research topics related to the diagnosis and management of patients with COPD and comorbid cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, atherosclerotic vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation) by summarizing existing evidence and using consensus-based methods. Methods: A literature search was performed. References were reviewed by committee co-chairs. An international, multidisciplinary committee, including a patient advocate, met virtually to review evidence and identify research topics. A modified Delphi approach was used to prioritize topics in real time on the basis of their potential for advancing the field. Results: Gaps spanned the translational science spectrum from basic science to implementation: 1) disease mechanisms; 2) epidemiology; 3) subphenotyping; 4) diagnosis and management; 5) clinical trials; 6) care delivery; 7) medication access, adherence, and side effects; 8) risk factor mitigation; 9) cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation; and 10) health equity. Seventeen experts participated, and quorum was achieved for all votes (>80%). Of 17 topics, ≥70% agreement was achieved for 12 topics after two rounds of voting. The range of summative Likert scores was -15 to 25. The highest priority was "Conduct pragmatic clinical trials with patient-centered outcomes that collect both pulmonary and cardiac data elements." Health equity was identified as an important topic that should be embedded within all research. Conclusions: We propose a prioritized research agenda with the purpose of stimulating high-impact research that will hopefully improve outcomes among people with COPD and cardiovascular disease.

Characteristics, Treatment, and Prognosis of Heart Failure Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA)

The impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on heart failure (HF) has yet to be well assessed in the Latin American population. This study aimed to analyze the impact of COPD on HF patients from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to assess the impact of COPD on mortality. From the total of 2528 patients in the registry, 2514 patients had information regarding COPD diagnosis. COPD diagnosis was associated with a worse functional class and higher use of diuretics than non-COPD patients (p < 0.001). Patients with this comorbidity had a significantly better ejection fraction (median ejection fraction 35% vs. 32% in non-COPD patients; p = 0.004), with a higher occurrence of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the COPD group (p = 0.000). Finally, patients with COPD had a significantly higher risk of mortality in the multivariate regression model (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.02, 2.11). COPD is a prevalent comorbidity among patients with HF in Colombia, showing a different clinical profile and a worse functional class than patients without this condition. Patients with COPD and HFpEF have a high mortality risk according to our results.

Prognostic impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma in patients with heart failure

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma on therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Analysis of the information collected in a clinical registry of patients referred to a specialized HF unit from January-2010 to June-2012. Clinical profile, treatment and prognosis of patients was evaluated, according to the presence of COPD or asthma. Survival analyses were conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier and Cox's methods. Median follow-up was 1493 days.

RESULTS

We studied 2577 patients, of which 251 (9.7%) presented COPD and 96 (3.7%) bronchial asthma. Significant differences among study groups were observed regarding to the prescription of beta-blockers (COPD=89.6%; asthma=87.5%; no bronchopathy=94.1%; p=0.002) and SGLT2 inhibitors (COPD=35.1%; asthma=50%; no bronchopathy=38.3%; p=0.036). Also, patients with bronchial disease received less frequently a defibrillator (COPD=20.3%; asthma=20.8%; no broncopathy=29%; p=0.004). COPD was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.64; 95% CI 1.33-2.02), all-cause death or HF admission (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.22-1.76) and cardiovascular death or heart transplantation (HR=1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.79) as compared with patients with no bronchopathy. Bronchial asthma was not significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD, but not asthma, is an adverse independent prognostic factor in patients with HF.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease: mechanistic links and implications for practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are both significant burdens on the healthcare system and often coexist. Mechanistic links between the two conditions and their clinical impact are increasingly understood.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies demonstrate multiple mechanisms by which the pathobiology of COPD may have negative effects on the cardiovascular system. These include extrapulmonary consequences of the COPD inflammatory state, cardiac autonomic dysfunction, which has been recently implicated in worsening respiratory symptoms and exacerbation risk, and mechanical effects of lung hyperinflation on left ventricular diastolic function.Clinical studies have consistently shown a high prevalence of CVD in COPD patients and worsened outcomes (and vice versa ). Exacerbations of COPD have also been demonstrated to dramatically increase the risk of cardiovascular events. While some safety concerns exist, medications for COPD and cardiovascular disease should be used in accordance with respective guidelines. However, real-world data show suboptimal management for patients with COPD and CVD.

SUMMARY

COPD and cardiovascular disease have complicated interrelationships. Further mechanistic studies may lead to defining better targets for interventions. Education for medical professionals and implementation of novel screening protocols should be encouraged to fill in the gaps in clinical care for these patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of undiagnosed major cardiac comorbidities in COPD

Background

It is often stated that heart disease is underdiagnosed in COPD. Evidence for this statement comes from primary studies, but these have not been synthesised to provide a robust estimate of the burden of undiagnosed heart disease.

Methods

A systematic review of studies using active diagnostic techniques to establish the prevalence of undiagnosed major cardiac comorbidities in patients with COPD was carried out. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for terms relating to heart failure (specifically, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation), relevant diagnostic techniques and COPD. Studies published since 1980, reporting diagnosis rates using recognised diagnostic criteria in representative COPD populations not known to have heart disease were included. Studies were classified by condition diagnosed, diagnostic threshold used and whether participants had stable or exacerbated COPD. Random-effects meta-analysis of prevalence was conducted where appropriate.

Results

In general, prevalence estimates for undiagnosed cardiac comorbidities in COPD had broad confidence intervals, with significant study heterogeneity. Most notably, a prevalence of undiagnosed LVSD of 15.8% (11.1-21.1%) was obtained when defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. Undiagnosed CAD was found in 2.3-18.0% of COPD patients and atrial fibrillation in 1.4% (0.3-3.5%).

Conclusion

Further studies using recent diagnostic advances, and investigating therapeutic interventions for patients with COPD and heart disease are needed.

Clinical features and outcomes of elderly hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure or both

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) mutually increase the risk of being present in the same patient, especially if older. Whether or not this coexistence may be associated with a worse prognosis is debated. Therefore, employing data derived from the REPOSI register, we evaluated the clinical features and outcomes in a population of elderly patients admitted to internal medicine wards and having COPD, HF or COPD + HF.

METHODS

We measured socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics, severity and prevalence of comorbidities, clinical and laboratory features during hospitalization, mood disorders, functional independence, drug prescriptions and discharge destination. The primary study outcome was the risk of death.

RESULTS

We considered 2,343 elderly hospitalized patients (median age 81 years), of whom 1,154 (49%) had COPD, 813 (35%) HF, and 376 (16%) COPD + HF. Patients with COPD + HF had different characteristics than those with COPD or HF, such as a higher prevalence of previous hospitalizations, comorbidities (especially chronic kidney disease), higher respiratory rate at admission and number of prescribed drugs. Patients with COPD + HF (hazard ratio HR 1.74, 95% confidence intervals CI 1.16-2.61) and patients with dementia (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.06-2.90) had a higher risk of death at one year. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a higher mortality risk in the group of patients with COPD + HF for all causes (p = 0.010), respiratory causes (p = 0.006), cardiovascular causes (p = 0.046) and respiratory plus cardiovascular causes (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

In this real-life cohort of hospitalized elderly patients, the coexistence of COPD and HF significantly worsened prognosis at one year. This finding may help to better define the care needs of this population.

Defining the Phenotypes for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) imposes a significant burden on society and healthcare. The lack in efficacious therapies is likely due to the significant heterogeneity of HFpEF. In this review, we define various phenotypes based on underlying comorbidities or etiologies, discuss phenotypes arrived at by novel methods, and explore therapeutic targets.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few studies have used machine learning methods to uncover sub-phenotypes within HFpEF in an unbiased manner based on clinical features, echocardiographic findings, and biomarker levels. We synthesized the literature and propose three broad phenotypes: (1) young, with few comorbidities, usually obese and with low natriuretic peptide levels, (2) obese with substantive cardiometabolic burden and comorbidities and impaired ventricular relaxation, (3) old, multimorbid, with high rates of atrial fibrillation, renal and coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy. We also propose potential therapeutic strategies for these phenotypes.