Secular and Regional Trends among Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trial Participants

Novel Liver Injury Phenotypes and Outcomes in Clinical Trial Participants with Pulmonary Hypertension

Rationale: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) cause right ventricular dysfunction, which can impact other solid organs. However, the profiles and consequences of hepatic injury resulting from PAH and CTEPH have not been well studied. Objectives: We aimed to identify underlying patterns of liver injury in a cohort of patients with PAH and CTEPH enrolled in 15 randomized clinical trials conducted between 1998 and 2014. Methods: We used unsupervised machine learning to identify liver injury clusters in 13 trials and validated the findings in two additional trials. We then determined whether these liver injury clusters were associated with clinical outcomes or treatment effect heterogeneity. Measurements and Main Results: Our training dataset included 4,219 patients and our validation dataset included 1,756 patients with serum total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and albumin data. Using k-means clustering, we identified phenotypes with no liver injury, hepatocellular injury, cholestatic injury, and combined injury patterns. Patients in the cholestatic injury liver cluster had the shortest time to clinical worsening and the highest risk of mortality. The cholestatic injury group also experienced the greatest placebo-corrected treatment effect on 6-minute-walk distance. Randomization to the experimental arm transitioned patients to a healthier liver status. Conclusions: Liver injury was associated with adverse outcomes in patients with PAH and CTEPH. Randomization to active treatment had beneficial effects on liver health compared with placebo. The role of liver disease (often subclinical) in determining outcomes warrants prospective studies.

Clinical trial design, end-points, and emerging therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have led to the approval of several effective treatments that improve symptoms, exercise capacity and clinical outcomes. In phase 3 clinical trials, primary end-points must reflect how a patient "feels, functions or survives". In a rare disease like PAH, with an ever-growing number of treatment options and numerous candidate therapies being studied, future clinical trials are now faced with challenges related to sample size requirements, efficiency and demonstration of incremental benefit on traditional end-points in patients receiving background therapy with multiple drugs. Novel clinical trial end-points, innovative trial designs and statistical approaches and new technologies may be potential solutions to tackle the challenges facing future PAH trials, but these must be acceptable to patients and regulatory bodies while preserving methodological rigour. In this World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension task force article, we address emerging trial end-points and designs, biomarkers and surrogate end-point validation, the concept of disease modification, challenges and opportunities to address diversity and representativeness, and the use of new technologies such as artificial intelligence in PAH clinical trials.

Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Their Association with Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Rationale: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with manifestations including right atrial enlargement, right ventricular dysfunction, dilation, and hypertrophy. Electrocardiography (ECG) is a noninvasive, inexpensive test that is routinely performed in clinical settings. Prior studies have described separate abnormal findings in the electrocardiograms of patients with PAH. However, the role of composite ECG findings reflective of right heart disease (RHD) for risk stratification, clinical trial enrichment, and management of patients with PAH has not been explored. Objectives: To describe a pattern of RHD on ECG in patients with PAH and to investigate the association of this pattern with clinical measures of disease severity and outcomes. Methods: We harmonized individual participant data from 18 phase III randomized clinical trials of therapies for PAH (1998-2013) submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. RHD was defined as the presence of right ventricular hypertrophy, right axis deviation, right atrial enlargement, or right bundle branch block on ECG. Random effects linear regression, multilevel ordinal regression (cumulative link model), and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of RHD by ECG with 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) functional class, and clinical worsening after a priori adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and PAH etiology. Effect modification of treatment and ECG abnormalities was assessed by including an interaction term. Results: A total of 4,439 patients had baseline ECG, and 68% of patients had evidence of RHD. RHD on ECG was associated with higher pulmonary vascular resistance (P < 0.001) and higher mean pulmonary artery pressures (P < 0.001). Patients with RHD on ECG had 10 meters shorter 6MWD (P = 0.005) and worse WHO functional class (P < 0.001) at baseline. RHD on baseline ECG was associated with increased risk of clinical worsening (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval; 1.21, 1.67; P < 0.001). Patients with RHD had greater treatment effect in terms of 6MWD, WHO functional class, and time to clinical worsening than those without (P for interaction = 0.03, 0.001, and 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: RHD by ECG may be associated with worse outcomes and potentially greater treatment effect. Electrocardiograms could be an inexpensive, widely available noninvasive method to enrich clinical trial populations in PAH.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment: an individual participant data network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Effective therapies that target three main signalling pathways are approved to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, there are few large patient-level studies that compare the effectiveness of these pathways. The aim of this analysis was to compare the effectiveness of the treatment pathways in PAH and to assess treatment heterogeneity.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was performed using individual participant data of 6811 PAH patients from 20 Phase III randomized clinical trials of therapy for PAH that were submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration. Individual drugs were grouped by the following treatment pathways: endothelin, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin pathways.

RESULTS

The mean (±standard deviation) age of the sample was 49.2 (±15.4) years; 78.4% were female, 59.7% had idiopathic PAH, and 36.5% were on background PAH therapy. After covariate adjustment, targeting the endothelin + nitric oxide pathway {β: 43.7 m [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.9, 54.4]}, nitric oxide pathway [β: 29.4 m (95% CI: 22.6, 36.3)], endothelin pathway [β: 25.3 m (95% CI: 19.8, 30.8)], and prostacyclin pathway [oral/inhaled β: 19.1 m (95% CI: 14.2, 24.0), intravenous/subcutaneous β: 24.4 m (95% CI: 15.1, 33.7)] significantly increased 6 min walk distance at 12 or 16 weeks compared with placebo. Treatments also significantly reduced the likelihood of having clinical worsening events. There was significant heterogeneity of treatment effects by age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs targeting the three traditional treatment pathways significantly improve outcomes in PAH, with significant treatment heterogeneity in patients with some comorbidities. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to identify the most effective treatment strategies in a personalized approach.

Extrapulmonary manifestations of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Extrapulmonary manifestations of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may play a critical pathobiological role and a deeper understanding will advance insight into mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. This manuscript reviews our understanding of extrapulmonary manifestations of PAH.

AREAS COVERED

A group of experts was assembled and a complimentary PubMed search performed (October 2023 - March 2024). Inflammation is observed throughout the central nervous system and attempts at manipulation are an encouraging step toward novel therapeutics. Retinal vascular imaging holds promise as a noninvasive method of detecting early disease and monitoring treatment responses. PAH patients have gut flora alterations and dysbiosis likely plays a role in systemic inflammation. Despite inconsistent observations, the roles of obesity, insulin resistance and dysregulated metabolism may be illuminated by deep phenotyping of body composition. Skeletal muscle dysfunction is perpetuated by metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and hypoperfusion, but exercise training shows benefit. Renal, hepatic, and bone marrow abnormalities are observed in PAH and may represent both end-organ damage and disease modifiers.

EXPERT OPINION

Insights into systemic manifestations of PAH will illuminate disease mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. Additional study is needed to understand whether extrapulmonary manifestations are a cause or effect of PAH and how manipulation may affect outcomes.

Is low-risk status a surrogate outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension? An analysis of three randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Targeting short-term improvements in multicomponent risk scores for mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) could result in improved long-term outcomes. We aimed to determine whether PAH risk scores were adequate surrogates for clinical worsening or mortality outcomes in PAH randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis of RCTs selected from PAH trials provided by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We calculated predicted risk using the COMPERA, COMPERA 2.0, non-invasive FPHR, REVEAL 2.0, and REVEAL Lite 2 risk scores. The primary outcome of interest was time to clinical worsening, a composite endpoint composed of any of the following events: all-cause death, hospitalisation for worsening PAH, lung transplantation, atrial septostomy, discontinuation of study treatment (or study withdrawal) for worsening PAH, initiation of parenteral prostacyclin analogue therapy, or decrease of at least 15% in 6-min walk distance from baseline, combined with either worsening of WHO functional class from baseline or the addition of an approved PAH treatment. The secondary outcome of interest was time to all-cause mortality. We assessed the surrogacy of these risk scores, parameterised as attainment of low-risk status by 16 weeks, for improvement in long-term clinical worsening and survival using mediation and meta-analysis frameworks.

FINDINGS

Of 28 trials received from the FDA, three RCTs (AMBITION, GRIPHON, and SERAPHIN; n=2508) had the data necessary to assess long-term surrogacy. The mean age was 49 years (SD 16), 1956 (78%) participants were women, 1704 (68%) were classified as White, and 280 (11%) were Hispanic or Latino. 1388 (55%) of 2503 participants with available data had idiopathic PAH and 776 (31%) of 2503 had PAH associated with connective tissue disease. In a mediation analysis, the proportions of treatment effects explained by attainment of low-risk status ranged only from 7% to 13%. In a meta-analysis of trial-regions, the treatment effects on low-risk status were not predictive of the treatment effects on time to clinical worsening (R2 values 0·01-0·19) nor the treatment effects on time to all-cause mortality (R2 values 0-0·2). A leave-one-out analysis suggested that the use of these risk scores as surrogates might lead to biased inferences regarding the effect of therapies on clinical outcomes in PAH RCTs. Results were similar when using absolute risk scores at 16 weeks as the potential surrogates.

INTERPRETATION

Multicomponent risk scores have utility for the prediction of outcomes in patients with PAH. Clinical surrogacy for long-term outcomes cannot be inferred from observational studies of outcomes. Our analyses of three PAH trials with long-term follow-up suggest that further study is necessary before using these or other scores as surrogate outcomes in PAH RCTs or clinical care.

FUNDING

Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund, US National Institutes of Health.

Novel Liver Injury Phenotypes and Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are disorders of the pulmonary vasculature that cause right ventricular dysfunction. Systemic consequences of right ventricular dysfunction include damage to other solid organs, such as the liver. However, the profiles and consequences of hepatic injury due to PAH and CTEPH have not been well-studied.

Methods

We aimed to identify underlying patterns of liver injury in a cohort of PAH and CTEPH patients enrolled in 15 randomized clinical trials conducted between 1998 and 2012. We used unsupervised machine learning to identify liver injury clusters in 13 trials and validated the findings in two additional trials. We then determined whether these liver injury clusters were associated with clinical outcomes or treatment effect heterogeneity.

Results

Our training dataset included 4,219 patients and our validation dataset included 1,756 patients with complete liver laboratory panels (serum total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and albumin). Using k-means clustering paired with factor analysis, we identified four unique liver phenotypes (no liver injury, hepatocellular injury, cholestatic injury, and combined injury patterns). Patients in the cholestatic injury liver cluster had the shortest time to clinical worsening and highest chance of worsening World Health Organization functional class. Randomization to the experimental arm was associated with a transition to healthier liver clusters compared to randomization to the control arm. The cholestatic injury group experienced the greatest placebo-corrected treatment benefit in terms of six-minute walk distance.

Conclusions

Liver injury patterns were associated with adverse outcomes in patients with PAH and CTEPH. Randomization to active treatment of pulmonary hypertension in these clinical trials had beneficial effects on liver health compared to placebo. The independent role of liver disease (often subclinical) in determining outcomes warrants prospective studies of the clinical utility of liver phenotyping for PAH prognosis and contribution to clinical disease.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: recent progress and a look to the future

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe but treatable form of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension caused by pulmonary vascular remodelling. As a result of basic science discoveries, randomised controlled trials, studies of real-world data, and the development of clinical practice guidelines, considerable progress has been made in the treatment options and outcomes for patients with PAH, underscoring the importance of seamless translation of information from bench to bedside and, ultimately, to patients. However, PAH still carries a high mortality rate, which emphasises the urgent need for transformative innovations in the field. In this Series paper, written by a group of clinicians, researchers, and a patient with PAH, we review therapeutic approaches and treatment options for PAH. We summarise current knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of PAH, with an emphasis on emerging treatable pathways and optimisation of current management strategies. In considering future directions for the field, our ambition is to identify therapies with the potential to stall or reverse pulmonary vascular remodelling. We highlight novel therapeutic approaches, the important role of patients as partners in research, and innovative approaches to PAH clinical trials.

Health Care Disparities in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The current approach for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) relies on data gathered from clinical trials and large registries. However, there is concern that minorities including Black, Indigenous, and People of Color are underrepresented in these trials and registries, making current data not generalizable to these groups of patients. Hence, it is important to discuss the significance of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic factors in patients with PAH. Here, we review the current knowledge on health care disparities in PAH. We also propose future steps in the global task of assuring justice and equality in access to pulmonary hypertension health care.

Heterogeneity of treatment effects by risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

It is currently unknown if disease severity modifies response to therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We aimed to explore if disease severity, as defined by established risk-prediction algorithms, modified response to therapy in randomised clinical trials in PAH.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis using individual participant data from 18 randomised clinical trials of therapy for PAH submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration to determine if predicted risk of 1-year mortality at randomisation modified the treatment effect on three outcomes: change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), clinical worsening at 12 weeks and time to clinical worsening.

RESULTS

Of 6561 patients with a baseline US Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL 2.0) score, we found that individuals with higher baseline risk had higher probabilities of clinical worsening but no difference in change in 6MWD. We detected a significant interaction of REVEAL 2.0 risk and treatment assignment on change in 6MWD. For every 3-point increase in REVEAL 2.0 score, there was a 12.49 m (95% CI 5.86-19.12 m; p=0.001) greater treatment effect in change in 6MWD. We did not detect a significant risk by treatment interaction on clinical worsening with most of the risk-prediction algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that predicted risk of 1-year mortality in PAH modified treatment effect as measured by 6MWD, but not clinical worsening. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying sources of treatment heterogeneity by predicted risk to tailor studies to patients most likely to have the greatest treatment response.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the 6-minute-walk Distance for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Rationale: The 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) is an important clinical and research metric in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, there is no consensus about what minimal change in 6MWD is clinically significant. Objectives: We aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference in the 6MWD. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis using individual participant data from eight randomized clinical trials of therapy for PAH submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to derive minimal clinically important differences in the 6MWD. The estimates were externally validated using the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry. We anchored the change in 6MWD to the change in the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form physical component score. Measurements and Main Results: The derivation (clinical trial) and validation (Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry) samples were comprised of 2,404 and 537 adult patients with PAH, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation age of the derivation sample was 50.5 ± 15.2 years, and 1,849 (77%) were female, similar to the validation sample. The minimal clinically important difference in the derivation sample was 33 meters (95% confidence interval, 27-38), which was almost identical to that in the validation sample (36 m [95% confidence interval, 29-43]). The minimal clinically important difference did not differ by age, sex, race, pulmonary hypertension etiology, body mass index, use of background therapy, or World Health Organization functional class. Conclusions: We estimated a 6MWD minimal clinically important difference of approximately 33 meters for adults with PAH. Our findings can be applied to the design of clinical trials of therapies for PAH.

Long-term impact of add-on sequential triple combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: real world experience

BACKGROUND

Sequential triple combination therapy is recommended for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients who are not at therapeutic goal on dual therapy, but long-term data on efficacy and safety is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term impact of sequential triple combination therapy in patients with PAH who are not at goal on dual combination therapy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study in a racially/ethnically diverse cohort of consecutive PAH patients on a stable dual therapy regimen who remained in intermediate- or high-risk category and were subsequently initiated on sequential triple combination therapy. We studied interval change in functional, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters, REVEAL 2.0 risk category and ERS/ESC 2022 simplified four-strata risk category. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of successful risk reduction (achievement or maintenance of REVEAL 2.0 low-risk category). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created to assess the effect of risk reduction on survival.

RESULTS

Out of 414 PAH patients seen in our program, 55 patients received add-on sequential triple combination regimen and had follow-up hemodynamic data. The mean age was 57 years, with 85% women. The most common etiology of PAH was idiopathic/heritable (41.8%). Most patients were WHO functional class III (76.4%), and 34.5% of patients were in high-risk category (REVEAL 2.0). On a median follow-up of 68 weeks, there was a significant improvement in WHO Functional Class (p < 0.001), six-minute walk distance (35 m) with 61.8% of patients achieving low-risk status by REVEAL 2.0, and a 28% of patients' improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance. Female gender was identified as a strong predictor of successful risk reduction, whereas Hispanic ethnicity estimated right atrial pressure on echocardiogram and pericardial effusion predicted lower probability of risk reduction. Patients who achieved or maintained low-risk status had significantly improved survival.

CONCLUSION

Add-on sequential triple combination therapy significantly increased functional, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters with improvement in risk category and survival.

Medications for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the most effective treatments of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Our objective was to compare effects of medications for PAH.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to December 2021. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis on all included trials. We rated the certainty of the evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 53 randomised controlled trials with 10 670 patients. Combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) plus phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) reduced clinical worsening (120.7 fewer events per 1000, 95% CI 136.8-93.4 fewer; high certainty) and was superior to either ERA or PDE5i alone, both of which reduced clinical worsening, as did riociguat monotherapy (all high certainty). PDE5i (24.9 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 35.2 fewer to 2.1 more); intravenous/subcutaneous prostanoids (18.3 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 28.6 fewer deaths to 0) and riociguat (29.1 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 38.6 fewer to 8.7 more) probably reduce mortality as compared to placebo (all moderate certainty). Combination therapy with ERA+PDE5i (49.9 m, 95% CI 25.9-73.8 m) and riociguat (49.5 m, 95% CI 17.3-81.7 m) probably increase 6-min walk distance as compared to placebo (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSION

Current PAH treatments improve clinically important outcomes, although the degree and certainty of benefit vary between treatments.

BMI and Treatment Response in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is increasingly prevalent in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but is associated with improved survival, creating an "obesity paradox" in PAH. It is unknown if the improved outcomes could be attributable to obese patients deriving a greater benefit from PAH therapies.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does BMI modify treatment effectiveness in PAH?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using individual participant data, a meta-analysis was conducted of phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of treatments for PAH submitted for approval to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from 2000 to 2015. Primary outcomes were change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and World Health Organization (WHO) functional class.

RESULTS

A total of 5,440 participants from 17 trials were included. Patients with overweight and obesity had lower baseline 6MWD and were more likely to be WHO functional class III or IV. Treatment was associated with a 27.01-m increase in 6MWD (95% CI, 21.58-32.45; P < .001) and lower odds of worse WHO functional class (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.70; P < .001). For every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, 6MWD was reduced by 0.66 m (P = .07); there was no significant effect modification of treatment response in 6MWD according to BMI (P for interaction = .34). Higher BMI was not associated with odds of WHO functional class at end of follow-up; however, higher BMI attenuated the treatment response such that every 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI increased odds of worse WHO functional class by 3% (OR, 1.03; P for interaction = .06).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with overweight and obesity had lower baseline 6MWD and worse WHO functional class than patients with normal weight with PAH. Higher BMI did not modify the treatment response for change in 6MWD, but it attenuated the treatment response for WHO functional class. PAH trials should include participants representative of all weight groups to allow for assessment of treatment heterogeneity and mechanisms.