1
|
McPeake J, Iwashyna TJ, MacTavish P, Devine H, Henderson P, Quasim T, Shaw M. Could an integrated model of health and social care after critical illness reduce socioeconomic disparities in outcomes? A Bayesian analysis. BJA OPEN 2024; 9:100259. [PMID: 38322488 PMCID: PMC10844938 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Background There is limited evidence to understand what impact, if any, recovery services might have for patients across the socioeconomic spectrum after critical illness. We analysed data from a multicentre critical care recovery programme to understand the impact of this programme across the socioeconomic spectrum. Methods The setting for this pre-planned secondary analysis was a critical care rehabilitation programme-Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment. Data were collected from five hospital sites running this programme. We utilised a Bayesian approach to analysis and explore any possible effect of the InS:PIRE intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) across the socioeconomic gradient. A Bayesian quantile, non-linear mixed effects regression model, using a compound symmetry covariance structure, accounting for multiple timepoints was utilised. The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) was used to measure socioeconomic status and HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L. Results In the initial baseline cohort of 182 patients, 55% of patients were male, the median age was 58 yr (inter-quartile range: 50-66 yr) and 129 (79%) patients had two or more comorbidities at ICU admission. Using the neutral prior, there was an overall probability of intervention benefit of 100% (β=0.71, 95% credible interval: 0.34-1.09) over 12 months to those in the SIMD≤3 cohort, and an 98.6% (β=-1.38, 95% credible interval: -2.62 to -0.16) probability of greater benefit (i.e. a steeper increase in improvement) at 12 months in the SIMD≤3 vs SIMD≥4 cohort in the EQ-visual analogue scale. Conclusions Using multicentre data, this re-analysis suggests, but does not prove, that an integrated health and social care intervention is likely to improve outcomes across the socioeconomic gradient after critical illness, with a potentially greater benefit for those from deprived communities. Future research designed to prospectively analyse how critical care recovery programmes could potentially improve outcomes across the socioeconomic gradient is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne McPeake
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Pamela MacTavish
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Devine
- Crosshouse University Teaching Hospital, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Phil Henderson
- Royal Alexandria Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tara Quasim
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK
| | - Martin Shaw
- University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, Glasgow, UK
- Clinical Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eaton TL, Lincoln TE, Lewis A, Davis BC, Sevin CM, Valley TS, Donovan HS, Seaman J, Iwashyna TJ, Alexander S, Scheunemann LP. Palliative Care in Survivors of Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study of Post-Intensive Care Unit Program Clinicians. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1644-1653. [PMID: 37831930 PMCID: PMC10771886 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Survivors of critical illness experience high rates of serious health-related suffering. The delivery of palliative care may assist in decreasing this burden for survivors and their families. Objectives: To understand beliefs, attitudes, and experiences of post-intensive care unit (ICU) program clinicians regarding palliative care and explore barriers and facilitators to incorporating palliative care into critical illness survivorship care. Design: Qualitative inquiry using semistructured interviews and framework analysis. Results were mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Setting/Subjects: We interviewed 29 international members (United States, United Kingdom, Canada) of the Critical and Acute Illness Recovery Organization post-ICU clinic collaborative. Results: All interprofessional clinicians described components of palliative care as essential to post-ICU clinic practice, including symptom management, patient/family support, facilitation of goal-concordant care, expectation management and anticipatory guidance, spiritual support, and discussion of future health care wishes and advance care planning. Facilitators promoting palliative care strategies were clinician level, including first-hand experience, perceived value, and a positive attitude regarding palliative care. Clinician-level barriers were reciprocals and included insufficient palliative care knowledge, lack of self-efficacy, and a perceived need to protect ICU survivors from interventions the clinician felt may adversely affect recovery or change the care trajectory. System-level barriers included time constraints, cost, and lack of specialty palliative care services. Conclusion: Palliative care may be an essential element of post-ICU clinic care. Implementation efforts focused on tailoring strategies to improve post-ICU program clinicians' palliative care knowledge and self-efficacy could be a key to enhanced care delivery for survivors of critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy L. Eaton
- National Clinician Scholars Program (NCSP), VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, and School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Taylor E. Lincoln
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, and Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna Lewis
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Clinical Care Coordination and Discharge Planning, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian C. Davis
- Kline School of Law, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carla M. Sevin
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas S. Valley
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Heidi S. Donovan
- Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Seaman
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, and School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sheila Alexander
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, and School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, and Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leslie P. Scheunemann
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eaton TL, Gersten RA, Iwashyna TJ. It Is Feasible to Relieve Distressing Symptoms after the ICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 208:1151-1153. [PMID: 37878817 PMCID: PMC10868363 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1768ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy L Eaton
- Department of Internal Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Center for Clinical Management Research Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vogel G, Forinder U, Sandgren A, Svensen C, Joelsson-Alm E. The distorted memories of patients treated in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2023; 79:103522. [PMID: 37598502 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients cared for in the intensive care unit were exposed to many risk factors for developing delirium and subsequent distorted memories. Further, seeing healthcare professionals who have been dressed in personal protective equipment and face masks could have affected the patients' memories. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore memories and how they are experienced and managed by former patients who have been treated for COVID-19 in an intensive care unit. METHODS Sixteen former patients treated for COVID-19 at a large emergency hospital in Sweden were interviewed 3-8 months after discharge from the intensive care unit. The data were interpreted using thematic analysis. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed in the reporting of the study. FINDINGS Participants' descriptions of their memories of treatment in the intensive care unit for COVID-19 generated three themes: 'Distorted truth' the content in the memories which implied facing death in an unreal distorted environment. 'Captive,' was the experience and feelings linked to memories with a feeling of being exposed and alone, and 'Coping with memories' explained how participants managed the implications of the memories using a mixture of strategies. CONCLUSIONS For former patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit after a diagnosis of COVID-19, memories caused considerable distress, which were similar to other intensive care patientś experiences, before the pandemic. Emotion-focused and problem-focused strategies could be used to cope with these memories. Healthcare professionals wearing protective equipment gave the patient a distant feeling, but more important was to be treated with attention/care and respect. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Awareness of the impact of distorted memories on patients who are severely ill and their needs and strategies to cope with these memories can form the basis for early interventions that promotes well-being during care and recovery. Healthcare professionals have an important task to inform patients and their family members about the existence of distorted memories, and talk about the patients' experience of them, to facilitate their recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisela Vogel
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken 10, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Ulla Forinder
- Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden.
| | - Anna Sandgren
- Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Universitetsplatsen 1, SE-352 52 Växjö, Sweden.
| | - Christer Svensen
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken 10, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Eva Joelsson-Alm
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Sjukhusbacken 10, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leggett AN, Robinson-Lane SG, Oxford G, Leonard N, Carmichael AG, Baker E, Paratore J, Blok AC, Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Gonzalez R. Barriers to and Facilitators of Family Caregiving of Patients With COVID-19 Early in the Pandemic. Am J Crit Care 2023; 32:431-439. [PMID: 37907378 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2023364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, many family members were thrust into the role of caregiving for a relative with COVID-19 with little preparation, training, or understanding of the disease and its symptoms. OBJECTIVES To explore the barriers to and facilitators of caregiving experienced by family caregivers of patients with COVID-19 who had been in intensive care in the pandemic's earliest months. METHODS In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted by web conference with 16 adults recovering at home after intubation for COVID-19 in an intensive care unit at a major academic medical center and their primary caregivers from March to August 2020 (N = 32). Thematic qualitative analysis was done using Watkins' rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique with MAXQDA software. RESULTS Seven themes emerged regarding factors that facilitated or posed barriers to care: other health conditions that increased complexity of care, interactions and experiences in the health care system, COVID-19's proliferation into other areas of life, the psychological well-being of the patient-caregiver dyad, experience of support from the dyad's network, the role of caregiving in the dyad, and contextual circumstances of the dyad. The themes often included both barriers and facilitators, depending on the experience of the dyad (eg, feeling encouraged vs fatigued by their support network). CONCLUSIONS Understanding how patients with COVID-19 and their caregivers experience illness management across the recovery journey can help clarify the COVID-19 care-giving process and identify intervention targets to improve overall health and well-being of the care dyad.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Leggett
- Amanda N. Leggett is an assistant professor in the Institute of Gerontology at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, and an adjunct assistant professor, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Sheria G Robinson-Lane
- Sheria G. Robinson-Lane is an assistant professor, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Grace Oxford
- Grace Oxford is a research assistant, Biosocial Methods Collaborative, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Natalie Leonard
- Natalie Leonard is a research technician, Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Alicia G Carmichael
- Alicia G. Carmichael is a research process manager, Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Elaina Baker
- Elaina Baker is a research assistant, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Janeann Paratore
- Janeann Paratore is a research assistant, Biosocial Methods Collaborative, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
| | - Amanda C Blok
- Amanda C. Blok is a research assistant professor, Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, School of Nursing, University of Michigan and a research health scientist, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Hallie C. Prescott is an associate professor, Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan and a research investigator, VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System
| | - Theodore J Iwashyna
- Theodore J. Iwashyna is the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Social Science and Justice in Medicine and professor of medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Gonzalez
- Richard Gonzalez is the Amos N. Tversky Professor, Psychology and Statistics and director, Research Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eaton TL, Taylor SP. Health system approaches to providing posthospital care for survivors of sepsis and critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29:513-518. [PMID: 37641522 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the current review, we highlight developing strategies taken by healthcare systems to improve posthospital outcomes for sepsis and critical illness. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies conducted in the adult population over the last 18 months have advanced current knowledge on postdischarge care after sepsis and critical illness. Effective interventions are complex and multicomponent, targeting the multilevel challenges that survivors face. Health systems can leverage existing care models such as primary care or invest in specialty programs to deliver postdischarge care. Qualitative and implementation science studies provide insights into important contextual factors for program success. Several studies demonstrate successful application of telehealth to improve reach of postdischarge support. Research is beginning to identify subtypes of survivors that may respond to tailored intervention strategies. SUMMARY Several successful critical illness survivor models of care have been implemented and knowledge about effectiveness, cost, and implementation factors of these strategies is growing. Further innovation is needed in intervention development and evaluation to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy L Eaton
- National Clinician Scholars Program (NCSP); VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, University of Michigan Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing
| | - Stephanie Parks Taylor
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Michigan Medicine; & Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boehm LM, Danesh V, Eaton TL, McPeake J, Pena MA, Bonnet KR, Stollings JL, Jones AC, Schlundt DG, Sevin CM. Multidisciplinary ICU Recovery Clinic Visits: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Provider Dialogues. Chest 2023; 163:843-854. [PMID: 36243061 PMCID: PMC10258431 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research confirms the heterogeneous nature of patient challenges during recovery from the ICU and supports the need for modifying care experiences, but few data are available to guide clinicians seeking to support patients' individual recovery trajectories. RESEARCH QUESTION What is the content of patient-provider dialogues in a telemedicine multidisciplinary ICU recovery clinic (ICU-RC)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study in a telemedicine multidisciplinary ICU-RC at a tertiary academic medical center in the southeastern United States. The sample included 19 patients and 13 caregivers (≥ 18 years of age) attending a telemedicine ICU-RC visit after critical illness resulting from septic shock or ARDS. Patients and caregivers met with an ICU pharmacist, ICU physician, and a psychologist via a secure web-conferencing platform for 33 ICU-RC visits within 12 weeks of hospital discharge. Telemedicine ICU-RC visits were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. A coding system was developed using iterative inductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS Two themes were identified from the patient-provider dialogue: (1) problem identification and (2) problem-solving strategies. We identified five subthemes that capture the types of problems identified: health status, mental health and cognition, medication management, health-care access and navigation, and quality of life. Problem-solving subthemes included facilitating care coordination and transitions, providing education, and giving constructive feedback and guidance. INTERPRETATION Patients surviving a critical illness experience a complexity of problems that may be addressed best by a multidisciplinary ICU-RC. Through analysis of our telemedicine ICU-RC dialogues, we were able to identify problems and solutions to address challenges during a critical transitional phase of ICU recovery. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03926533; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne M Boehm
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, Survivorship Center, Nashville, TN.
| | - Valerie Danesh
- Center for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - Tammy L Eaton
- National Clinician Scholars Program, VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Joanne McPeake
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Maria A Pena
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kemberlee R Bonnet
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Joanna L Stollings
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, Survivorship Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - David G Schlundt
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Carla M Sevin
- Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, Survivorship Center, Nashville, TN; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thomas-Purcell K, Davenport R, Ayala V, Purcell D, Ownby RL. Chronic Disease Self-Management of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Among Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:607-617. [PMID: 37082741 PMCID: PMC10112475 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s393732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Approximately 20-30% of individuals who contract acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection develop longer term complications of their initial infection, referred to as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). PASC is characterized by chronic, varying symptomatology. Methods Using a mixed methods study design, we aimed to gain insight into individuals' experience with PASC, including cognitive issues, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. We explored whether our previously developed application (app), aimed at improving self-management skills among individuals with chronic diseases, is relevant for individuals with PASC and gained information to adapt the app for individuals with PASC. The study included 19 individuals, aged 40 years and older, recruited from our research participant database, Nova Southeastern University clinics, and community locations. We included this age range because older adults are more likely to have comorbid conditions, allowing us to better understand the impact of COVID-19 infection in these individuals. Participants completed seven standardized self-report questionnaires online, and an individual semi-structured interview via videoconferencing. Quantitative data were assessed using descriptive statistics and calculating individuals' scores in relation to norms. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Triangulation of the data was accomplished by calculating correlations between participants' responses on self-report scales and themes found in semi-structured interviews. Results Themes included disruption of everyday life, diverse physical symptoms, and cognitive problems including brain fog, fatigue, coping, and emotional upset. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that participants experienced high levels of fatigue, negative mood, cognitive problems, and overall reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Correlation analyses revealed that individual interview responses were related to participants' self-report of symptoms on standard questionnaires. Discussion Findings indicate that self-report questionnaires may reflect the experience of individuals with PASC and its impact. Additionally, further efforts to expand our prior mobile app are warranted among individuals with PASC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rosemary Davenport
- Department of Psychiatry, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Victoria Ayala
- Department of Psychiatry, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Donrie Purcell
- Satcher Health Leadership Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Raymond L Ownby
- Department of Psychiatry, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Correspondence: Raymond L Ownby, Nova Southeastern University, Center for Collaborative Research Suite 430, 3301 College Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 33314, USA, Tel +1-954-608-4846, Email
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hope AA, McPeake J. Healthcare delivery and recovery after critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2022; 28:566-571. [PMID: 35975964 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize improvements and innovations in healthcare delivery which could be implemented to improve the recovery experience after critical illness for adult survivors and their families. RECENT FINDINGS For survivors of critical illness, the transitions in care during their recovery journey are points of heightened vulnerability associated with adverse events. Survivors of critical illness often have errors in the management of their medications during the recovery period. A multicomponent intervention delivered for 30 days that focused on four key principles of improved recovery care after sepsis care was associated with a durable effect on 12-month rehospitalization and mortality compared with usual care. A recent multicentre study which piloted integrating health and social care for critical care survivors demonstrated improvements in health-related quality of life and self-efficacy at 12 months. Multiple qualitative studies provide insights into how peer support programmes could potentially benefit survivors of critical illness by providing them mechanism to share their experiences, to give back to other patients, and to set more realistic expectations for recovery. SUMMARY Future research could focus on exploring safety outcomes as primary endpoints and finding ways to develop and test implementation strategies to improve the recovery after critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aluko A Hope
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Joanne McPeake
- The Institute of Healthcare Improvement Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
- The Improvement Hub, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|