Race-Specific Interpretation of Spirometry: Impact on the Lung Allocation Score

Application of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Spirometry Standards and Race-Neutral Equations in the COPDGene Study

Rationale: For spirometry interpretation, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommend using z-scores, and the ATS has recommended using Global Lung Initiative (GLI) "Global" race-neutral reference equations. However, these recommendations have been variably implemented, and the impact has not been widely assessed in clinical or research settings. Objectives: To evaluate the ERS/ATS classification of airflow obstruction severity. Methods: In COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of COPD Study) (N = 10,108), airflow obstruction has been defined by an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70, with spirometric severity graded from class 1 to class 4 based on race-specific percent predicted (pp) FEV1 cutoff points as recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). We compared the GOLD approach, using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III race-specific equations, versus the application of GLI Global equations using the ERS/ATS definition of airflow obstruction as an FEV1/FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal and z-score-based FEV1 cutoff points of -1.645, -2.5, and -4 ("zGLI Global"). We tested the four-tier severity scheme for association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes. Measurements and Main Results: The lowest agreement between ERS/ATS with zGLI Global and the GOLD classification was observed in individuals with milder disease (56.9% and 42.5% in GOLD stages 1 and 2, respectively), and race was a major determinant of redistribution. After adjustment for relevant covariates, zGLI Global distinguished all-cause mortality risk between normal spirometry and the first grade of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.44; P = 0.014) and showed a linear increase in exacerbation rates with increasing disease severity in comparison with GOLD. Conclusions: The zGLI Global severity classification outperformed the GOLD criteria in the discrimination of survival, exacerbations, and imaging characteristics.

Use of Race-Specific Equations in Pulmonary Function Tests Impedes Potential Eligibility for Care and Treatment of Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: The use of race-specific reference values to evaluate pulmonary function has long been embedded into clinical practice; however, there is a growing consensus that this practice may be inappropriate and that the use of race-neutral equations should be adopted to improve access to health care. Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of race-neutral equations to assess percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%pred) impacts eligibility for clinical trials, antifibrotic therapy, and referral for lung transplantation in Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: FVC%pred values for patients from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry were calculated using race-specific (Hankinson and colleagues, 1999), race-agnostic (Global Lung Function Initiative [GLI]-2012), and race-neutral (GLI-2022 or GLI-Global) equations. Eligibility for ILD clinical trials (FVC%pred >45% and <90%), antifibrotic therapy (FVC%pred >55% and <82%), and lung transplantation referral (FVC%pred <70%) based on GLI-2022 and GLI-2012 equations were compared with those based on the Hankinson 1999 equation. Results: Baseline characteristics were available for 1,882 patients (Black, n = 104; Hispanic/Latino, n = 103; White, n = 1,675), and outcomes were evaluated in 1,531 patients with FVC%pred within ±90 days of registry enrollment (Black, n = 78; Hispanic/Latino, n = 72; White, n = 1,381). Black patients were younger at the time of consent and more likely to be female compared with Hispanic/Latino or White patients. Compared with GLI-2022, the Hankinson 1999 equation misclassified 22% of Black patients, 14% of Hispanic/Latino patients, and 12% of White patients for ILD clinical trial eligibility; 21% of Black patients, 17% of Hispanic/Latino patients, and 19% of White patients for antifibrotic therapy eligibility; and 6% of Black patients, 14% of Hispanic/Latino patients, and 12% of White patients for lung transplantation referral. Similar trends were observed when comparing the GLI-2012 and Hankinson 1999 equations. Conclusions: Misclassification of patients for critical interventions is highly prevalent when using the Hankinson 1999 equation and highlights the need to consider adopting the race-neutral GLI-2022 equation for enhanced accuracy and more equitable representation in pulmonary health care. Our results make a compelling case for reevaluating the use of race as a physiological variable and emphasize the pressing need for continuous innovation to ensure equal and optimal care for all patients regardless of their race or ethnicity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02758808).

Changes in Spirometry Interpretative Strategies: Implications for Classifying COPD and Predicting Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines for spirometry interpretation recommend both race-neutral reference equations and use of z score thresholds to define severity of airflow obstruction.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does the transition from race-specific to race-neutral equations impact severity classifications for patients with COPD when using % predicted vs z score thresholds, and do changes in severity correspond to clinical risk?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included Black and White patients with COPD and available spirometry from the Johns Hopkins Health System. Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 (race-specific) equations and GLI Global (race-neutral) equations were used to determine FEV1 % predicted and z score values. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe disease according to % predicted or z score thresholds. Associations between a change in severity classification from race-specific to race-neutral with COPD exacerbations and all-cause hospitalizations were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

This cohort included 13,324 patients, of whom 9,232 patients (69.3%) were White (mean age, 65.7 years) and 4,092 patients (30.7%) were Black (mean age, 61.1 years). More Black than White patients showed a change in severity classification between approaches when using % predicted thresholds (20.2% vs 6.1%; P < .001), but not with z score thresholds (12.6% vs 12.3%; P = .68). An increased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with increased risk of exacerbation when using z score thresholds (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.51-3.63), but not when using % predicted thresholds (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.61-1.93). A decreased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with lower risk of exacerbation with both % predicted (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87) and z score (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) thresholds.

INTERPRETATION

The proportions of Black and White individuals reclassified were similar with z score thresholds, and changes in severity corresponded to clinical risk with z scores. These results support recent recommendations for use of race-neutral equations and z score thresholds for spirometry interpretation.

Implications of Race Adjustment in Lung-Function Equations

BACKGROUND

Adjustment for race is discouraged in lung-function testing, but the implications of adopting race-neutral equations have not been comprehensively quantified.

METHODS

We obtained longitudinal data from 369,077 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, U.K. Biobank, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Using these data, we compared the race-based 2012 Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) equations with race-neutral equations introduced in 2022 (GLI-Global). Evaluated outcomes included national projections of clinical, occupational, and financial reclassifications; individual lung-allocation scores for transplantation priority; and concordance statistics (C statistics) for clinical prediction tasks.

RESULTS

Among the 249 million persons in the United States between 6 and 79 years of age who are able to produce high-quality spirometric results, the use of GLI-Global equations may reclassify ventilatory impairment for 12.5 million persons, medical impairment ratings for 8.16 million, occupational eligibility for 2.28 million, grading of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 2.05 million, and military disability compensation for 413,000. These potential changes differed according to race; for example, classifications of nonobstructive ventilatory impairment may change dramatically, increasing 141% (95% confidence interval [CI], 113 to 169) among Black persons and decreasing 69% (95% CI, 63 to 74) among White persons. Annual disability payments may increase by more than $1 billion among Black veterans and decrease by $0.5 billion among White veterans. GLI-2012 and GLI-Global equations had similar discriminative accuracy with regard to respiratory symptoms, health care utilization, new-onset disease, death from any cause, death related to respiratory disease, and death among persons on a transplant waiting list, with differences in C statistics ranging from -0.008 to 0.011.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of race-based and race-neutral equations generated similarly accurate predictions of respiratory outcomes but assigned different disease classifications, occupational eligibility, and disability compensation for millions of persons, with effects diverging according to race. (Funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.).

Discussing and Teaching About Race and Health Inequities

Health inequities are prevalent in our medical institutions and result in unfair access to and delivery of health care. Some of the most profound health disparities are related to race, which has erroneously been used to make biological inferences to explain disease states in medicine. Our profession continues to shift away from such race-based medical narratives, which do not examine how social determinants of health, social injustice, systemic racism, and existing power structures shape health outcomes toward a health equity mindset and race-conscious medicine. Clinician educators are responsible for teaching and engaging with learners around issues of inequity in medicine, although many may feel they lack the knowledge or skills to do so. Opportunities for conversations on health equity abound, either as a response to statements made by clinical peers or patients, or through direct clinical care of affected populations. In this paper, we focus our discussion of health equity around the topic of race corrections in spirometry, which is one of several salient areas of conversation in the field of pulmonary medicine undergoing reconciliation. We review basic definitions and concepts in health equity and apply three strategies to engage in conversations around equity with colleagues and learners: actively learning and reflecting on health inequities, recognizing and naming inequities, and consciously role-modeling equity-conscious language and care. We also will summarize strategies for implementing health equity concepts into the continuum of medical education and our clinical learning environments.

Standards for the care of people with cystic fibrosis (CF); Planning for a longer life

This is the final of four papers updating standards for the care of people with CF. That this paper "Planning a longer life" was considered necessary, highlights how much CF care has progressed over the past decade. Several factors underpin this progress, notably increased numbers of people with CF with access to CFTR modulator therapy. As the landscape for CF changes, so do the hopes and aspirations of people with CF and their families. This paper reflects the need to consider people with CF not as a "problem" to be solved, but as a success, a potential and a voice to be heard. People with CF and the wider CF community have driven this approach, reflecting many of the topics in this paper. This exercise involved wide stakeholder engagement. People with CF are keen to contribute to research priorities and be involved in all stages of research. People with CF want healthcare professionals to respect them as individuals and consider the impact of our actions on the world around us. Navigating life presents challenges to all, but for people with CF these challenges are heightened and complex. In this paper we highlight the concerns and life moments that impact people with CF, and events that the CF team should aim to support, including the challenges around having a family. People with CF and their care teams must embrace the updated standards outlined in these four papers to enjoy the full potential for a healthier life.

Racial Disparities in Waiting List Outcomes of Patients Listed for Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The Lung Allocation Score, implemented in 2005, prioritized lung transplant candidates by medical urgency rather than waiting list time and was expected to improve racial disparities in transplant allocation. We evaluated whether racial disparities in lung transplant persisted after 2005.

METHODS

We identified all wait-listed adult lung transplant candidates in the United States from 2005 through 2021 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We evaluated the association between race and receipt of a transplant by using a multivariable competing risk regression model adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, Lung Allocation Score, clinical measures, and time. We evaluated interactions between race and age, sex, socioeconomic status, and Lung Allocation Score.

RESULTS

We identified 33,158 candidates on the lung transplant waiting list between 2005 and 2021: 27,074 White (82%), 3350 African American (10%), and 2734 Hispanic (8%). White candidates were older, had higher education levels, and had lower Lung Allocation Scores (P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, African American and Hispanic candidates were less likely to receive lung transplants than White candidates (African American: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91; Hispanic: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87). Lung transplant was significantly less common among Hispanic candidates aged >65 years (P = .003) and non-White candidates from higher-poverty communities (African-American: P = .013; Hispanic: P =.0036).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite implementation of the Lung Allocation Score, racial disparities persisted for wait-listed African American and Hispanic lung transplant candidates and differed by age and poverty status. Targeted interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to this life-saving intervention.

Testing Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in Black Populations

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency (AATD) is an under-recognized hereditary disorder and a significant cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a disease that contributes to global mortality. AAT is encoded by the SERPINA1 gene, and severe mutation variants of this gene increase the risk of developing COPD. AATD is more frequently screened for in non-Hispanic White populations. However, AATD is also observed in other ethnic groups and very few studies have documented the mutation frequency in these other ethnic populations. Here, we review the current literature on AATD and allele frequency primarily in Black populations and discuss the possible clinical outcomes of low screening rates in a population that experiences poor health outcomes and whether the low frequency of AATD is related to a lack of screening in this population or a truly low frequency of mutations causing AATD. This review also outlines the harmful SERPINA1 variants, the current epidemiology knowledge of AATD, health inequity in Black populations, AATD prevalence in Black populations, the clinical implications of low screening of AATD in this population, and the possible dangers of not diagnosing or treating AATD.