Comparison of iohexol plasma clearance formulas vs. inulin urinary clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate

Creatinine-based formulas are not ideal to estimate glomerular filtration rate in selected pediatric patients: data from a tertiary pediatric nephrology center

BACKGROUND

Evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains challenging in pediatrics; new formulas were developed to increase performance of GFR estimation (eGFR). We aimed to evaluate the recently published formulas as applied to another pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of 307 patients with a "kidney risk" (mean age 12.1 ± 4.5 years, sex ratio 1/1) assessed in a tertiary pediatric nephrology center and a mean measured GFR (mGFR) using plasma iohexol clearance of 85.5 ± 25.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; creatinine levels were measured by IDMS-standardized enzymatic method and cystatin C by immunonephelometry. The following eGFRs were calculated: Schwartz2009, Schwartz-Lyon, CKiDU25creat, and EKFC for eGFR using creatinine (eGFR-creat), CKiDU25cys and FAScys for eGFR using cystatin (eGFR-cys) as well as combined SchwartzCreat-Cys, average (CKiDU25creat-CKiDU25cys), and average (EKFC-FAScys) for eGFR using both biomarkers. The performance of the different formulas was evaluated compared to mGFR by absolute bias measurement and accuracy (p10%, p30%). Results are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Creatinine-based formulas and especially the new CKiDU25 and EKFC overestimate GFR, even in children with normal kidney function. However, the bias is constant with these two formulas whatever the age group or gender, contrary to the previously published formulas. In contrast, cystatin C-based equations and combined formulas showed good performance in all age groups and all medical conditions with an acceptable bias and p30%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our pediatric population, the performance of all creatinine-based formulas is inadequate with significant GFR overestimation, mainly in subjects with mGFR > 75 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, cystatin C-based or combined formulas have acceptable performance in patients followed in a tertiary pediatric nephrology unit.

Iohexol plasma clearance measurement protocol standardization for adults: a consensus paper of the European Kidney Function Consortium

International consensus supports the development of standardized protocols for measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) to facilitate the integration of mGFR testing in both clinical and research settings. To this end, the European Kidney Function Consortium convened an international group of experts with relevant experience in mGFR. The working group performed an extensive literature search to inform the development of recommendations for mGFR determination using 1-compartment plasma clearance models and iohexol as the exogenous filtration marker. Iohexol was selected as it is non-radio labeled, inexpensive, and safe, can be assayed at a central laboratory, and the other commonly used non-radio-labeled tracers have been (inulin) or are soon to be (iothalamate) discontinued. A plasma clearance model was selected over urine clearance as it requires no urine collection. A 1 compartment was preferred to 2 compartments as it requires fewer samples. The recommendations are based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. The consensus paper covers practical advice for patients and health professionals, preparation, administration, and safety aspects of iohexol, laboratory analysis, blood sample collection and sampling times using both multiple and single-sample protocols, description of the mGFR mathematical calculations, as well as implementation strategies. Supplementary materials include patient and provider information sheets, standard operating procedures, a study protocol template, and support for mGFR calculation.

Accuracy of Shorter Iohexol GFR Measurement Protocols in Individuals with Preserved Kidney Function

Key Points

Shorter measured GFR protocols are accurate and precise compared with the reference standard measured GFR protocol in patients with preserved GFR. These shorter protocols can potentially improve the adoption of GFR measurement more widely by reducing procedural time and cost.

Background

Measured GFR (mGFR) using exogenous tracers is recommended in a number of settings. Plasma one-compartment multisample protocols (MSPs) are the most commonly used, with iohexol being the dominant tracer. The accuracy of MSPs has mostly been evaluated in the setting of reduced GFR where delayed initial and final samples are recommended. Much less is known about MSPs when GFR is not decreased, and the default protocol tends to include initial sampling at 120 minutes and final sampling at 240 minutes after iohexol injection. The recent Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD includes research recommendations for the development of shorter more efficient mGFR protocols. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of shorter MSPs with earlier initial (60 and 90 minutes) and final (150, 180, and 210 minutes) sampling times in individuals with preserved GFR. Reference mGFR (R-mGFR) was calculated using five samples collected between 120 and 240 minutes.

Methods

Four different combinations of shorter sampling strategies were investigated. Performance was evaluated using measurements of bias, precision, and accuracy (P2, P5, and mean absolute error).

Results

The mean R-mGFR of the 43 participants was 102.3±13.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2. All shorter mGFRs had biases <1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and mean absolute error <1.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2. All shorter mGFRs were within 5% of the R-mGFR, and the majority were within 2%.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that shortening the mGFR procedure in individuals with preserved GFR provides similar results to the current standard while significantly decreasing procedure time.

Optimal assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in older chinese patients using the equations of the Berlin Initiative Study

AIM

To evaluate the performances of the various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), and the Full Age Spectrum (FAS) in older Chinese.

METHODS

This study enrolled Chinese adults aged ≥ 65 years who underwent GFR measurements (via 99Tcm-DTPA renal dynamic imaging) in our hospital from 2011 to 2022. Using the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) as the reference, we derived the bias, precision, accuracy, and consistency of each equation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 519 participants, comprising 155 with mGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 364 with mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. In the total patients, the BIS equation based on creatinine and cystatin C (BIScr-cys) exhibited the lowest bias [median (95% confidence interval): 1.61 (0.77-2.18)], highest precision [interquartile range 11.82 (10.32-13.70)], highest accuracy (P30: 81.12%), and best consistency (95% limit of agreement: 101.5 mL/min/1.73 m2). In the mGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup, the BIScr-cys and FAS equation based on creatinine and cystatin C (FAScr-cys) performed better than the other equations; in the mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup, all equations exhibited relatively large deviations from the mGFR. Of all eight equations, the BIScr-cys performed the best.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no equation was fully accurate in the mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroup, the BIScr-cys (of the eight equations) assessed the eGFRs of the entire population best. A new equation is urgently required for older Chinese and even East Asians, especially those with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency.

A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate

In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, it is not uncommon for the actual sample time to deviate from the optimal one. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of parameter estimations to such deviations in an LSS. A previously developed 4-point LSS for estimation of serum iohexol clearance (i.e., dose/AUC) was used to exemplify the effect of sample time deviations. Two parallel strategies were used: (a) shifting the exact sampling time by an empirical amount of time for each of the four individual sample points, and (b) introducing a random error across all sample points. The investigated iohexol LSS appeared robust to deviations from optimal sample times, both across individual and multiple sample points. The proportion of individuals with a relative error greater than 15% (P15) was 5.3% in the reference run with optimally timed sampling, which increased to a maximum of 8.3% following the introduction of random error in sample time across all four time points. We propose to apply the present method for the validation of LSS developed for clinical use.

Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate in White and Black populations in Europe, Brazil and Africa

BACKGROUND

A new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation without the race variable has been recently proposed (CKD-EPIAS). This equation has neither been validated outside USA nor compared with the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) and Lund-Malmö Revised (LMREV) equations, developed in European cohorts.

METHODS

Standardized creatinine and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the European EKFC cohorts (n = 13 856 including 6031 individuals in the external validation cohort), from France (n = 4429, including 964 Black Europeans), from Brazil (n = 100) and from Africa (n = 508) were used to test the performances of the equations. A matched analysis between White Europeans and Black Africans or Black Europeans was performed.

RESULTS

In White Europeans (n = 9496), both the EKFC and LMREV equations outperformed CKD-EPIAS (bias of -0.6 and -3.2, respectively versus 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m², and accuracy within 30% of 86.9 and 87.4, respectively, versus 80.9%). In Black Europeans and Black Africans, the best performance was observed with the EKFC equation using a specific Q-value (= concentration of serum creatinine in healthy males and females). These results were confirmed in matched analyses, which showed that serum creatinine concentrations were different in White Europeans, Black Europeans and Black Africans for the same measured GFR, age, sex and body mass index. Creatinine differences were more relevant in males.

CONCLUSION

In a European and African cohort, the performances of CKD-EPIAS remain suboptimal. The EKFC equation, using usual or dedicated population-specific Q-values, presents the best performance in the whole age range in the European and African populations included in this study.

Age-adapted percentiles of measured glomerular filtration in healthy individuals: extrapolation to living kidney donors over 65 years

OBJECTIVES

Most data on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) originate from subjects <65 years old, complicating decision-making in elderly living kidney donors. In this retrospective multi-center study, we calculated percentiles of measured GFR (mGFR) in donors <65 years old and extrapolated these to donors ≥65 years old.

METHODS

mGFR percentiles were calculated from a development cohort of French/Belgian living kidney donors <65 years (n=1,983), using quantiles modeled as cubic splines (two linear parts joining at 40 years). Percentiles were extrapolated and validated in an internal cohort of donors ≥65 years (n=147, France) and external cohort of donors and healthy subjects ≥65 years (n=329, Germany, Sweden, Norway, France, The Netherlands) by calculating percentages within the extrapolated 5th-95th percentile (P5-P95).

RESULTS

Individuals in the development cohort had a higher mGFR (99.9 ± 16.4 vs. 86.4 ± 14 and 82.7 ± 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m²) compared to the individuals in the validation cohorts. In the internal validation cohort, none (0%) had mGFR below the extrapolated P5, 12 (8.2%) above P95 and 135 (91.8%) between P5-P95. In the external validation cohort, five subjects had mGFR below the extrapolated P5 (1.5%), 25 above P95 (7.6%) and 299 (90.9%) between P5-P95.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that extrapolation of mGFR from younger donors is possible and might aid with decision-making in elderly donors.

Comparison of Plasma Clearance With Early-Compartment Correction Equations and Urinary Clearance in High GFR Ranges

Introduction

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is measured from the late plasma disappearance curve of an exogenous tracer, after correction for the early decay—corresponding to the distribution of the tracer—using various equations. These equations display the highest discrepancies in the GFR range above 90 ml/min per 1.73 m², and their respective performances against a reference, urinary GFR measurement are unclear.

Methods

In patients with mGFR >90 ml/min per 1.73 m² from 6 different cohorts, we compared GFR obtained from the plasma clearance of iohexol or ⁵¹Cr-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), after correction using Chantler (C), Bröchner-Mortensen (BM), Fleming (F), Jodal-Bröchner-Mortensen (JBM), and Ng (N) equations, with urinary clearance of the same tracers or inulin.

Results

In 438 participants (median age 41 [39–42] years, 43% women), the median urinary clearance was 100.8 (94.7–112.6) ml/min per 1.73 m². Plasma clearances using the correction equations were 105.7 (96.8–119.2), 102.4 (95.2–112.9), 100.7 (93.6–111.1), 102.6 (95.2–113.4), and 106.0 (98.2–117.6) ml/min per 1.73 m² for C, BM, F, JBM, and N, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficients between plasma and urinary clearances were poor for all equations. Compared with urinary clearances, BM, F, and JBM displayed the best accuracy within 10% (73%, 72%, and 71%, respectively, vs. 63% and 66% for C and N), whereas BM and JBM had the lowest median biases. Accuracy of all equations was especially low in the hyperfiltration range (urinary clearance >130 ml/min per 1.73 m²).

Conclusion

The BM and JBM equations displayed the best overall performances to correct for the early disappearance curve. Results of these equations should be interpreted with caution, especially in the highest GFR range.