Meta-analysis reveals protective effects of vitamin B on stroke patients

Mean platelet volume modifies the contribution of homocysteine to cardiovascular disease: A real-world study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effect of reductions in homocysteine (Hcy) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) was suggested to be modified by platelet activation, but the interaction between Hcy and platelet activation on CVD events is not well studied. Here, we aimed to examine the interaction between Hcy and platelet activation on CVD in a large, real-world population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 27,234 patients with hypertension (mean 63 years, 48% male) who were registered in Taicang city and free of CVD were prospectively followed up for new CVD events from 2017 to 2020. Hcy and platelet indices including mean platelet volume (MPV) were assayed at baseline. A total of 1063 CVD events were recorded during follow-up. Hcy at baseline was significantly associated with a higher risk of CVD (HR = 1.85, P < 0.001 for log-transformed Hcy). MPV showed a significant interaction effect with Hcy on CVD (HR = 1.20, P = 0.030 for the interaction term). The association between Hcy and CVD was significantly stronger in participants with a large (vs. small) MPV (HR = 2.71 vs. 1.32, P = 0.029 for log-transformed Hcy). For participants with both elevated Hcy and a large MPV, the attributable proportion of CVD events due to their interaction was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.06-0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between Hcy and CVD was significantly stronger in patients with hypertension with a larger MPV. MPV may modify the contribution of Hcy to CVD events through synergistic interactions with Hcy. These findings suggest that MPV could be monitored and controlled in the prevention of CVD.

The Influence of Gut Dysbiosis in the Pathogenesis and Management of Ischemic Stroke

Recent research on the gut microbiome has revealed the influence of gut microbiota (GM) on ischemic stroke pathogenesis and treatment outcomes. Alterations in the diversity, abundance, and functions of the gut microbiome, termed gut dysbiosis, results in dysregulated gut–brain signaling, which induces intestinal barrier changes, endotoxemia, systemic inflammation, and infection, affecting post-stroke outcomes. Gut–brain interactions are bidirectional, and the signals from the gut to the brain are mediated by microbially derived metabolites, such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs); bacterial components, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS); immune cells, such as T helper cells; and bacterial translocation via hormonal, immune, and neural pathways. Ischemic stroke affects gut microbial composition via neural and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) pathways, which can contribute to post-stroke outcomes. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that the restoration of the gut microbiome usually improves stroke treatment outcomes by regulating metabolic, immune, and inflammatory responses via the gut–brain axis (GBA). Therefore, restoring healthy microbial ecology in the gut may be a key therapeutic target for the effective management and treatment of ischemic stroke.

Mechanistic Insight on Autophagy Modulated Molecular Pathways in Cerebral Ischemic Injury: From Preclinical to Clinical Perspective

Cerebral ischemia is one of the most devastating brain injuries and a primary cause of acquired and persistent disability worldwide. Despite ongoing therapeutic interventions at both the experimental and clinical levels, options for stroke-related brain injury are still limited. Several evidence suggests that autophagy is triggered in response to cerebral ischemia, therefore targeting autophagy-related signaling pathways can provide a new direction for the therapeutic implications in the ischemic injury. Autophagy is a highly conserved lysosomal-dependent pathway that degrades and recycles damaged or non-essential cellular components to maintain neuronal homeostasis. But, whether autophagy activation promotes cell survival against ischemic injury or, on the contrary, causes neuronal death is still under debate. We performed an extensive literature search from PubMed, Bentham and Elsevier for various aspects related to molecular mechanisms and pathobiology involved in autophagy and several pre-clinical studies justifiable further in the clinical trials. Autophagy modulates various downstream molecular cascades, i.e., mTOR, NF-κB, HIF-1, PPAR-γ, MAPK, UPR, and ROS pathways in cerebral ischemic injury. In this review, the various approaches and their implementation in the translational research in ischemic injury into practices has been covered. It will assist researchers in finding a way to cross the unbridgeable chasm between the pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Therapeutic potential of nutraceuticals to protect brain after stroke

Stroke leads to significant neuronal death and long-term neurological disability due to synergistic pathogenic mechanisms. Stroke induces a change in eating habits and in many cases, leads to undernutrition that aggravates the post-stroke pathology. Proper nutritional regimen remains a major strategy to control the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases including stroke. Studies indicate that nutraceuticals (isolated and concentrated form of high-potency natural bioactive substances present in dietary nutritional components) can act as prophylactic as well as adjuvant therapeutic agents to prevent stroke risk, to promote ischemic tolerance and to reduce post-stroke consequences. Nutraceuticals are also thought to regulate blood pressure, delay neurodegeneration and improve overall vascular health. Nutraceuticals potentially mediate these effects by their powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This review discusses the studies that have highlighted the translational potential of nutraceuticals as stroke therapies.

Modified Diet Supplementation With Group B Vitamins Changes Antioxidant Defense Activity Of Brain

The research aimed at effect of modified diet and supplementation with synthetic B vitamins on brain antioxidant status evaluation. Forty male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups (n = 10); group I - fed Basic Diet (BD), groups II-IV - Modified Diet (MD), where wheat flour replaced 83.5 % wheat and sucrose replaced 50 % maize. Groups I-II received only water, while group III (MD + AS) was given an aqueous vitamins solution supplementing deficiency from diet modification (MD + Adequate Supplementation: B₁-0.94, B₂-0.48, B₆-0.5, niacin-1.9 mg); group IV (MD + ES) received a solution in order to supplement deficiency resulting from the change in diet and recommended prophylactic dose of vitamins (MD + Excessive Supplementation: B₁-3.1, B₂-2.3, B₆-2.4, niacin-6.65 mg). The experimental phase lasted 6 weeks. Blood serum was examined, to determine glucose and iron concentration; determination of FRAP in plasma, in brain tissue the activities of GST, GPx, CAT, SOD, SH content, and FRAP. It was found that MD and MD + AS did not influence cereal antioxidant status. In brain tissue, MD + ES group exhibited an increased glycaemia (7.49 mmol×l^-1 p = 0.038) and increased activity of antioxidant enzymes activity (GST 0,099 U/mg protein p = 0.005; GPx 0,039 U/mg protein p = 0.007). Brain tissue of rats also exhibited larger content of protein bond SH in comparison to BD, MD and MD + AS groups (SH 414.6 mmol/g wet weight p < 0.001; p < 0.005). These findings suggest that, an excessive supplementation with vitamins B and niacin, in sucrose rich diet, may lead to enhancing activity of cellular antioxidant defense in brain tissue of rats.

Homocysteine-lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease, which includes coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease, is a leading cause of death worldwide. Homocysteine is an amino acid with biological functions in methionine metabolism. A postulated risk factor for cardiovascular disease is an elevated circulating total homocysteine level. The impact of homocysteine-lowering interventions, given to patients in the form of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 supplements, on cardiovascular events has been investigated. This is an update of a review previously published in 2009, 2013, and 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether homocysteine-lowering interventions, provided to patients with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease are effective in preventing cardiovascular events, as well as reducing all-cause mortality, and to evaluate their safety.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1946 to 1 June 2017), Embase (1980 to 2017 week 22) and LILACS (1986 to 1 June 2017). We also searched Web of Science (1970 to 1 June 2017). We handsearched the reference lists of included papers. We also contacted researchers in the field. There was no language restriction in the search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of homocysteine-lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events with a follow-up period of one year or longer. We considered myocardial infarction and stroke as the primary outcomes. We excluded studies in patients with end-stage renal disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction in duplicate. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB). We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. We used a random-effects model. We conducted trial sequential analyses, Bayes factor, and fragility indices where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

In this third update, we identified three new randomised controlled trials, for a total of 15 randomised controlled trials involving 71,422 participants. Nine trials (60%) had low risk of bias, length of follow-up ranged from one to 7.3 years. Compared with placebo, there were no differences in effects of homocysteine-lowering interventions on myocardial infarction (homocysteine-lowering = 7.1% versus placebo = 6.0%; RR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.10, I2 = 0%, 12 trials; N = 46,699; Bayes factor 1.04, high-quality evidence), death from any cause (homocysteine-lowering = 11.7% versus placebo = 12.3%, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06, I2 = 0%, 11 trials, N = 44,817; Bayes factor = 1.05, high-quality evidence), or serious adverse events (homocysteine-lowering = 8.3% versus comparator = 8.5%, RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.14, I2 = 0%, eight trials, N = 35,788; high-quality evidence). Compared with placebo, homocysteine-lowering interventions were associated with reduced stroke outcome (homocysteine-lowering = 4.3% versus comparator = 5.1%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, I2 = 8%, 10 trials, N = 44,224; high-quality evidence). Compared with low doses, there were uncertain effects of high doses of homocysteine-lowering interventions on stroke (high = 10.8% versus low = 11.2%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.22, I2 = 72%, two trials, N = 3929; very low-quality evidence).We found no evidence of publication bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this third update of the Cochrane review, there were no differences in effects of homocysteine-lowering interventions in the form of supplements of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 given alone or in combination comparing with placebo on myocardial infarction, death from any cause or adverse events. In terms of stroke, this review found a small difference in effect favouring to homocysteine-lowering interventions in the form of supplements of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 given alone or in combination comparing with placebo.There were uncertain effects of enalapril plus folic acid compared with enalapril on stroke; approximately 143 (95% CI 85 to 428) people would need to be treated for 5.4 years to prevent 1 stroke, this evidence emerged from one mega-trial.Trial sequential analyses showed that additional trials are unlikely to increase the certainty about the findings of this issue regarding homocysteine-lowering interventions versus placebo. There is a need for additional trials comparing homocysteine-lowering interventions combined with antihypertensive medication versus antihypertensive medication, and homocysteine-lowering interventions at high doses versus homocysteine-lowering interventions at low doses. Potential trials should be large and co-operative.