An assessment of zonisamide as an anti-epileptic drug

Pretreatment with Zonisamide Mitigates Oxaliplatin-Induced Toxicity in Rat DRG Neurons and DRG Neuron–Schwann Cell Co-Cultures

Oxaliplatin (OHP) is a platinum-based agent that can cause peripheral neuropathy, an adverse effect in which the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons are targeted. Zonisamide has exhibited neuroprotective activities toward adult rat DRG neurons in vitro and therefore, we aimed to assess its potential efficacy against OHP-induced neurotoxicity. Pretreatment with zonisamide (100 μM) alleviated the DRG neuronal death caused by OHP (75 μM) and the protective effects were attenuated by a co-incubation with 25 μM of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; MEK/ERK) inhibitor, U0126, or the phosphatidyl inositol-3′-phosphate-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002. Pretreatment with zonisamide also suppressed the OHP-induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation in lined DRG neurons, ND7/23, while the OHP-induced DRG neuronal death was alleviated by pretreatment with the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB239063 (25 μM). Although zonisamide failed to protect the immortalized rat Schwann cells IFRS1 from OHP-induced cell death, it prevented neurite degeneration and demyelination-like changes, as well as the reduction of the serine/threonine-specific protein kinase (AKT) phosphorylation in DRG neuron–IFRS1 co-cultures exposed to OHP. Zonisamide’s neuroprotection against the OHP-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy is possibly mediated by a stimulation of the MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways and suppression of the p38 MAPK pathway in DRG neurons. Future studies will allow us to solidify zonisamide as a promising remedy against the neurotoxic adverse effects of OHP.

Zonisamide enhances neurite outgrowth from adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons, but not proliferation or migration of Schwann cells

Zonisamide, an anti-epileptic and anti-Parkinson’s disease drug, displays neurotrophic activity on cultured motor neurons and facilitates axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in mice, but its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, zonisamide enhanced neurite outgrowth from cultured adult rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in a concentration-dependent manner (1 μM < 10 μM < 100 μM), and its activity was significantly attenuated by co-treatment with a phosphatidyl inositol-3′-phosphate-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor LY294002 or a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor U0126. In agreement with these findings, 100 μM zonisamide for 1 h induced phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2, key molecules of PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways, respectively in mouse neuroblastoma × rat DRG neuron hybrid cells ND7/23. In contrast, zonisamide failed to promote proliferation or migration of immortalized Fischer rat Schwann cells 1 (IFRS1). These findings suggest that the beneficial effects of zonisamide on peripheral nerve regeneration may be attributable to its direct actions on neurons through PI3K and MAPK pathways, rather than the stimulation of Schwann cells.

The adverse event profile of zonisamide: a meta-analysis

The first aim of our study was to analyze the adverse events statistically significantly associated with zonisamide, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). The second aim was to compare these results with those obtained from an analysis of non-RCTs and observational studies. Randomized controlled trials were identified using Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL, from 1990 to September 2012. RevMan version 5.1 and OpenMeta[Analyst] were used for analyses of RCT and non-RCTs, respectively. Six eligible studies with 1184 patients between 12 and 80 years of age were included in RCTs analysis. Fifteen adverse events were investigated. In this first part of the analysis, no adverse events were statistically significantly associated with zonisamide. In the non-RCT analysis, a high incidence of weight loss and headache was found. In RCTs, zonisamide was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse event-related study withdrawals [RR (99% CI) = 1.81 (1.07-3.08)]. Although our study revealed no statistically significantly associated adverse effects (AEs) with zonisamide, this is very likely a consequence of the small numbers in the RCTs available. The limited data available from the studies appear to reveal no major safety concerns related to zonisamide. However, the high incidence of weight loss and headache in the non-RCTs suggests that these AEs could be of clinical significance.

Weight-reducing side effects of the antiepileptic agents topiramate and zonisamide

Drug-induced weight alteration can be a serious side effect that applies to several therapeutic agents and must be referred to in the respective approved labeling texts. The side effect may become health threatening in case of significant weight change in either direction. Several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are associated with weight gain such as gabapentin, pregabalin, valproic acid, and vigabatrin and to some extent carbamazepine. Others are weight neutral such as lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and phenytoin or associated with slight weight loss as, e.g., felbamate. The focus of this chapter is on the two AEDs causing strong weight loss: topiramate and zonisamide. For both drugs, several molecular mechanisms of actions are published. We provide a review of these potential mechanisms, some of which are based on in vivo studies in animal models for obesity, and of clinical studies exploring these two drugs as single entities or in combinations with other agents.

Zonisamide for migraine prophylaxis in refractory patients

Zonisamide is a new antiepileptic drug with multiple mechanisms of action and a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Preliminary data suggest that zonisamide may be effective in migraine prophylaxis. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide for migraine prophylaxis in refractory patients. We reviewed the charts of adult patients with International Headache Society-defined episodic migraine (EM) or with transformed migraine (TM) according to the Silberstein-Lipton criteria, who had been treated with zonisamide at our out-patient clinic for at least 60 days. Demographic data, zonisamide dosage and duration of treatment were collected and analysed. Headache frequency, attack duration, headache severity and headache-related disability before and after treatment initiation with zonisamide were compared. Thirty-three patients were included in the study (average age 43.9 +/- 8.4 years; 23 (70%) with TM and 10 (30%) with EM). The patients had failed an average of 6.2 migraine prophylactic drugs prior to zonisamide. The average zonisamide daily dose was 337.9 +/- 146.3 mg and the average duration of treatment was 186.4 +/- 174.0 days. The average number of days with headache per month was reduced in the entire study population from 20.7 +/- 9.5 before zonisamide treatment to 18.0 +/- 11.3 after its initiation (P = 0.06) [in TM from 24.7 +/- 7.3 to 21.0 +/- 10.7 (P = 0.06); in EM from 11.6 +/- 7.6 to 11.0 +/- 9.7 (P = NS)]. No significant changes in other headache parameters were found. Fourteen patients (42.4%) reported adverse events (AEs), the most common of which was fatigue. Most patients (12/14, 85.7%) rated AEs as mild or moderate. In this group of refractory migraine patients, zonisamide therapy did not result in a statistically significant beneficial effect on headache or on associated symptoms.

Lithium differs from anticonvulsant mood stabilizers in prefrontal cortical and accumbal dopamine release: role of 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism

Anticonvulsant mood stabilizers, e.g., valproic acid and carbamazepine, and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), e.g., clozapine, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, have been reported to preferentially increase dopamine (DA) release in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), an effect partially or fully inhibited by WAY100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) antagonist. These atypical APDs have themselves been reported to be effective mood stabilizers, although the importance of increased cortical DA release to mood stabilization has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether zonisamide, another anticonvulsant mood stabilizer, as well as lithium, a mood stabilizer without anticonvulsant properties, also increases prefrontal cortical DA release and, if so, whether this release is also inhibited by 5-HT(1A) antagonism. As with valproic acid and carbamazepine, zonisamide (12.5 and 25 mg/kg) increased DA release in the mPFC, but not the NAC, an increase abolished by WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg). However, lithium (100 and 250 mg/kg) decreased DA release in the NAC, an effect also attenuated by WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg). Lithium itself had no effect in the mPFC but the combination of WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg) and lithium (100 and 250 mg/kg) markedly increased DA release in the mPFC. Furthermore, M100907 (0.1 mg/kg), a selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist, abolished this increase in DA release in the mPFC. These results indicate that not all mood-stabilizing agents but only those, which have anticonvulsant mood-stabilizing properties, increase DA release in the cortex, and that the effect is dependent upon 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation. However, the combination of lithium and 5-HT(1A) blockade may result in excessive 5-HT(2A) receptor stimulation, relative to 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation, both of which can increase prefrontal cortical DA release.

Dose-dependent Safety and Efficacy of Zonisamide: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Patients with Refractory Partial Seizures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (> or =50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of "all seizures" and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose-response relation was observed (p < 0.0001). The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase.

CONCLUSIONS

ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.

New drugs for the treatment of epilepsy: a practical approach

The availability of new antiepileptic drugs has broadened the spectrum of medical treatment options in epilepsy. The new agents, together with established drugs, offer substantial choice for doctors treating patients with focal or generalised epilepsy. The newer antiepileptic drugs are not necessarily more effective but usually better tolerated than the traditional agents, mainly because of favourable pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer interactions. Because treatment options have increased, drug therapy can now be tailored to the requirements of individual patients. Nevertheless, significant safety and efficacy issues continue to exist and there is a need for the development of even better agents. This review describes the clinical use of the new antiepileptic drugs, but focuses in particular on monotherapy, the treatment of generalised seizures, teratogenicity, and the cognitive side effect profile of the newer compounds.

Calcium-independent inhibition of glucose transport in PC-12 and L6 cells by calcium channel antagonists

The goal of these studies was to determine whether different calcium channel antagonists affect glucose transport in a neuronal cell line. Rat pheochromocytoma (PC-12) cells were treated with L-, T-, and N-type calcium channel antagonists before measurement of accumulation of 2-[(3)H]deoxyglucose (2-[(3)H]DG). The L-type channel antagonists nimodipine, nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem all inhibited glucose transport in a dose-dependent manner (2-150 microM) with nimodipine being the most potent and diltiazem only moderately inhibiting transport. T- and N-type channel antagonists had no effect on transport. The L-type channel agonist l-BAY K 8644 also inhibited uptake of 2-[(3)H]DG. The ability of these drugs to inhibit glucose transport was significantly diminished by the presence of unlabeled 2-DG in the uptake medium. Some experiments were performed in the presence of EDTA (4 mM) or in uptake buffer without calcium. The absence of calcium in the uptake medium had no effect on inhibition of glucose transport by nimodipine or verapamil. To examine the effects of these drugs on a cell model of a peripheral tissue, we studied rat L6 muscle cells. The drugs inhibited glucose transport in L6 myoblasts in a dose-dependent manner that was independent of calcium in the uptake medium. These studies suggest that the calcium channel antagonists inhibit glucose transport in cells through mechanisms other than the antagonism of calcium channels, perhaps by acting directly on glucose transporters.