Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation

Pleiotropic effects of antiarrhythmic agents: dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation remains the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dronedarone is an amiodarone derivative developed to reduce the number of extracardiovascular side effects. Dronedarone has undergone extensive experimental and clinical testing during the last decade. On the aggregate, these studies have highlighted a complex set of pleiotropic actions that may contribute to dronedarone's antiarrhythmic effects. In this review, we summarize the clinical studies that have evaluated dronedarone and provide an overview of dronedarone's electrophysiological and nonelectrophysiological pleiotropic actions.

Comparison of electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of vernakalant, ranolazine, and sotalol in canine pulmonary vein sleeve preparations

BACKGROUND

Vernakalant (VER) is a relatively atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drug capable of blocking potassium and sodium currents in a frequency- and voltage-dependent manner. Ranolazine (RAN) is a sodium-channel blocker shown to exert antiarrhythmic effects in pulmonary vein (PV) sleeves. dl-Sotalol (SOT) is a β-blocker commonly used in the rhythm-control treatment of atrial fibrillation. This study evaluated the electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of VER, RAN, and SOT in canine PV sleeve preparations in a blinded fashion.

METHODS

Transmembrane action potentials were recorded from canine superfused PV sleeve preparations exposed to VER (n = 6), RAN (n = 6), and SOT (n = 6). Delayed afterdepolarizations were induced in the presence of isoproterenol and high-calcium concentrations by periods of rapid pacing.

RESULTS

In PV sleeves, VER, RAN, and SOT (3-30 μM) produced small (10-15 ms) increases in action potential duration. The effective refractory period, diastolic threshold of excitation, and the shortest S(1)-S(1) cycle length permitting 1:1 activation were significantly increased by VER and RAN in a rate- and concentration-dependent manner. VER and RAN significantly reduced V(max) in a concentration- and rate-dependent manner. SOT did not significantly affect the effective refractory period, V(max), diastolic threshold of excitation, or the shortest S(1)-S(1) cycle length permitting 1:1 activation. All 3 agents (3-30 μM) suppressed delayed afterdepolarization-mediated triggered activity induced by isoproterenol and high calcium.

CONCLUSIONS

In canine PV sleeves, the effects of VER and RAN were similar and largely characterized by concentration- and rate-dependent depression of sodium-channel-mediated parameters, which were largely unaffected by SOT. All 3 agents demonstrated an ability to effectively suppress delayed afterdepolarization-induced triggers of atrial arrhythmia.