Pharmacotherapy of heparin- induced thrombocytopenia

Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews

The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.

Choosing the Appropriate Antithrombotic Agent for the Prevention and Treatment of VTE: A Case-Based Approach

Objective:

To review the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in various patient populations and evaluate the agents available for the prevention and treatment of VTE using a case-based approach.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1995–July 2006) was conducted to identify relevant literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles related to the prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and medically ill patients, as well as the treatment of VTE, were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Pharmacologic options for the prevention and treatment of VTE include warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), and fondaparinux. Current guidelines support the use of warfarin, LMWH, or fondaparinux for VTE prophylaxis following lower limb major orthopedic surgery. For VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients or patients undergoing general surgery, use of UFH and LMWH is supported; however, recent data on fondaparinux suggest that it is also effective in these patient populations. The use of UFH or LMWH (both in conjunction with warfarin) for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or nonmassive pulmonary embolism is recommended. Recent data suggest that fondaparinux (in conjunction with warfarin) is also effective for the treatment of VTE. A variety of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacoeconomic factors differentiate each agent for the various indications.

Conclusions:

Currently, a “one-size-fits-all” anticoagulant is not available for treatment of VTE. A variety of patient factors, including type of surgery, medical indication, thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and a variety of comorbid conditions can affect the safety, efficacy, and selection of appropriate VTE therapy.

Neonatal portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis and management

Neonatal portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognized event. Patients are generally asymptomatic in the neonatal period. The diagnosis is made with Doppler ultrasound. Umbilical catheterization, exchange transfusion and sepsis are risk factors for neonatal PVT. Thrombophilia is possibly a contributing risk factor. Although there are potential serious acute complications such as hepatic necrosis, the outcome is good in the majority of cases, followed up to 8 years of age. Thrombus resolution occurs in 30-70% in days to months. Liver lobe atrophy may occur following PVT, and does not appear to be associated with any impairment of liver function. Non-occlusive thrombosis is more likely to resolve than non-occlusive thrombosis. A subset of patients without resolution is at risk for developing portal hypertension over the next decade of life. There are no current defining features present during the neonatal period to enable identification of neonates at risk for portal hypertension. There is no evidence that anticoagulation therapy improves time to resolution or decreases the likelihood of portal hypertension. Anticoagulation therapy may be considered. A management algorithm is proposed.

Functional divergence between 2 chemokines is conferred by single amino acid change

CXCL4 and CXCL4L1 are 2 closely related CXC chemokines that exhibit potent antiangiogenic activity. Because interactions with glycosaminoglycans play a crucial role in chemokines activity, we determined the binding parameters of CXCL4 and CXCL4L1 for heparin, heparan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate B. We further demonstrated that the Leu67/His67 substitution is critical for the decrease in glycan binding of CXCL4L1 but also for the increase of its angiostatic activities. Using a set of mutants, we show that glycan affinity and angiostatic properties are not completely related. These data are reinforced using a monoclonal antibody that specifically recognizes structural modifications in CXCL4L1 due to the presence of His67 and that blocks its biologic activity. In vivo, half-life and diffusibility of CXCL4L1 compared with CXCL4 is strongly increased. As opposed to CXCL4L1, CXCL4 is preferentially retained at its site of expression. These findings establish that, despite small differences in the primary structure, CXCL4L1 is highly distinct from CXCL4. These observations are not only of great significance for the antiangiogenic activity of CXCL4L1 and for its potential use in clinical development but also for other biologic processes such as inflammation, thrombosis or tissue repair.

Anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic complications are much higher in pregnancy due to procoagulant changes. Heparin does not cross the placenta and the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the current established practice in prophylaxis and treatment for thromboembolism in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapies for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. The anticoagulant drugs included are UFH, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (March 2010) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing any combination of warfarin, UFH, LMWH and placebo in pregnant women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbooks for Systemic Reviews of Interventions for assessing the eligibility of studies identified by the search strategy. A minimum of two review authors independently assessed each study.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any eligible studies for inclusion in the review.We identified three potential studies; after assessing eligibility, we excluded all three as they did not meet the prespecified inclusion criteria. One study compared LMWH and UFH in pregnant women with previous thromboembolic events and, for most of these women, anticoagulants were used as thromboprophylaxis. There were only three women who had a thromboembolic event during the current pregnancy and it was unclear whether the anticoagulant was used as therapy or prophylaxis. We excluded one study because it included only women undergoing caesarean birth. The third study was not a randomised trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. Further studies are required.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A contemporary clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Thrombocytopenia following heparin administration can be associated with an immune reaction, now referred to as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is essentially a prothrombotic disorder mediated by an IgG antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody, which induces platelet, endothelial cell, monocyte, and other cellular activation, leading to thrombin generation and thrombotic complications. Indeed, HIT can also be regarded as a serious adverse drug effect. Importantly, HIT can be a life-threatening and limb-threatening condition frequently associated with characteristically severe and extensive thromboembolism (both venous and arterial) rather than with bleeding. This article provides an overview of HIT, with an emphasis on the clinical diagnosis and management.

Clinical experience with the iLA Membrane Ventilator pumpless extracorporeal lung-assist device

Extracorporeal gas exchange by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been established clinically in patients with acute lung failure. The interventional lung-assist (iLA) Membrane Ventilator device (Novalung) is a sophisticated representative of a new generation of pumpless extracorporeal lung-assist devices that are driven by the patient's cardiac output and therefore, do not require extracorporeal pump assistance. The system is characterized by a new membrane gas exchange system with optimized blood flow that is integrated in an arteriovenous bypass established by vascular cannulation. This particular pumpless extracorporeal lung-assist device was applied in 1800 patients for artificial lung assistance with easy use and low cost. This article reviews the present state of clinical Novalung device implementation focusing on encountered limitations and conceivable future developments in the field.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critical care setting: Diagnosis and management^

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a common occurrence in critical illness, reported in up to 41% of patients. Systematic evaluation of thrombocytopenia in critical care is essential to accurate identification and management of the cause. Although sepsis and hemodilution are more common etiologies of thrombocytopenia in critical illness, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one potential etiology that warrants consideration.

OBJECTIVE

This review will summarize the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of HIT, describe the diagnostic process, and review currently available treatment options.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE/PubMed search of all relevant primary and review articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a clinicopathologic syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia (>/=50% from baseline) that typically occurs between days 5 and 14 after initiation of heparin. This temporal profile suggests a possible diagnosis of HIT, which can be supported (or refuted) with a strong positive (or negative) laboratory test for HIT antibodies. When considering the diagnosis of HIT, critical care professionals should monitor platelet counts in patients who are at risk for HIT and carefully evaluate for, a) temporal features of the thrombocytopenia in relation to heparin exposure; b) severity of thrombocytopenia; c) clinical evidence for thrombosis; and d) alternative etiologies of thrombocytopenia. Due to its prothrombotic nature, early recognition of HIT and prompt substitution of heparin with a direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g., argatroban or lepirudin) or the heparinoid danaparoid (where available) reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, some of which may be life-threatening.

Recombinant factor VIIa for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery secondary to anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin

A 56-year-old man with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) received anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and aortic valve replacement. The patient experienced life-threatening refractory bleeding that was successfully treated with recombinant factor VIIa. He had a history of infective endocarditis that resulted in severe aortic insufficiency, three-vessel coronary artery disease, and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The patient was transferred from another hospital for the emergency surgery, but before his transfer, he developed HITTS secondary to therapeutic heparin for a deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. The presence of HITTS, the urgent nature of the case, and the availability of the direct thrombin inhibitor led the surgical team to select lepirudin for anticoagulation to facilitate cardiopulmonary bypass. After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, the patient was in a coagulopathic state due to the inability to reverse the lepirudin and the slowed elimination of the drug secondary to inadequate renal function. As a result, the patient experienced excessive generalized oozing that was unresponsive to traditional therapies and blood product transfusions. Recombinant factor VIIa 35 microg/kg was given as rescue therapy. The bleeding slowed, which allowed placement of chest tubes and closing of the sternum. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition with no evidence of thrombosis in the freshly placed bypass grafts or on the bioprosthetic valve. Recombinant factor VIIa appears to be a suitable option as salvage therapy in patients with refractory bleeding secondary to anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor during cardiac surgery.

Argatroban Dosing of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and an Elevated aPTT Due to Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

Objective:

To describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITTS) or without thrombosis (HIT) who also had an elevated baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) due to antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS).

Case Summary:

Four patients with HIT/HITTS and an elevated baseline aPTT due to APS were identified. Two patients had venous thrombosis, 1 had limb ischemia, and 1 had isolated HIT. All 4 were managed with a weight-based fixed dose of argatroban without laboratory monitoring. None of the patients had thrombotic or bleeding complications once therapy was initiated.

Discussion:

Management of patients with HIT/HITTS and an abnormal baseline aPTT due to APS is problematic. We review alternative management strategies, such as monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors with the ecarin clotting time or thrombin inhibition time or using an alternative anticoagulant, such as fondaparinux. As of March 13, 2006, none of these management strategies has been evaluated in a clinical trial for this patient population. We report the successful use of weight-based, fixed-dose argatroban without laboratory monitoring in patients with APS.

Conclusions:

Use of a fixed-dose argatroban regimen without laboratory monitoring is a potential management strategy for patients with HIT/HITTS and an elevated baseline aPTT due to APS.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: clinical manifestations and management strategies

Thrombocytopenia is a relatively frequent and usually benign clinical complication of heparin therapy. However, some patients receiving heparin and heparin-based products experience an immune-mediated reaction due to the development of heparin-induced antibodies. This reaction leads to a highly specific and paradoxical form of thrombocytopenia, known as type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unlike other types of drug-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT promotes thrombosis rather than bleeding; therefore HIT should be suspected in patients who experience thrombotic events despite adequate anticoagulation therapy. Early identification and treatment of HIT can prevent more serious complications associated with this disorder (e.g., exacerbation of venous thromboembolism, limb gangrene, and skin necrosis). Both arterial and venous thrombosis can arise from a single episode of HIT. Routine assessment of platelet counts is necessary with heparin therapy, as a decreased platelet level is usually the only indication of HIT. Although compared with unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin therapy is less likely to result in HIT, the use of these agents is contraindicated in HIT patients. Concomitant warfarin therapy is not contraindicated in such patients but must be carefully monitored. Treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor, such as lepirudin or argatroban, is an effective strategy in reversing the thrombocytopenia associated with HIT and reducing its complications. This article discusses the clinical syndrome of HIT, including pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, clinical presentations, and current available management strategies in the context of 2 case studies.

Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution

Interventional radiology techniques made possible by the antithrombotic properties of heparin have revolutionized treatment for a myriad of disorders. Newer low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) offer several advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially in chronic settings. They are increasing in popularity for use during vascular procedures. However, LMWH shares limitations with UFH such as heterogeneity, nonspecificity, and induction of thrombocytopenia. These drawbacks have led to a search for the next generation of antithrombotic agents. Homogeneous drugs targeting specific coagulation cascade molecules are now available. The number of alternative anticoagulant drug combinations presents clinicians with a confusing array of choices. The strengths and weaknesses of UFH, LMWH, and direct antithrombin agents are presented. The promising future of LMWH and hirudins is discussed.

Is INR between 2.0 and 3.0 the optimal level for Chinese patients on warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation?

AIM

To examine the optimal range of International Normalized Ratio (INR) for Chinese patients receiving warfarin for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the ambulatory setting of a 1400-bed public teaching hospital in Hong Kong. The INR measurements and occurrence of serious or life-threatening haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events among patients newly started on warfarin from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2001 for indications with target INR 2-3 were analysed. The INR-specific incidence of bleeding and thromboembolism were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients were included, contributing to 453 patient-years of observation period. Forty-seven of the 491 patients experienced 25 haemorrhagic events (5.5 per 100 patient-years) and 27 thromboembolic events (6.0 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient-time spent within therapeutic INR range (2-3), INR <2 and INR >3 were 50, 44 and 6%, respectively. The incidence of either haemorrhagic or thromboembolic events was lowest (< or =4 events per 100 patient-years) at INR values between 1.8 and 2.4.

CONCLUSIONS

An INR of 1.8-2.4 appeared to be associated with the lowest incidence rate of major bleeding or thromboembolic events in a cohort of Hong Kong Chinese patients receiving warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

Pharmacoeconomics of low-molecular-weight heparins: limitations of studies comparing them to unfractionated heparin

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) entered medical usage in the 1930s and was the mainstay of acute anticoagulation until the 1980s, when low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) became available. At this time, the acquisition cost of LMWHs, being greater than that of UFH, was a significant barrier to their use even though there was evidence that this was offset by savings in monitoring and other areas. Evidence of the superiority of LMWHs over UFH in many clinical settings has been accumulating and, along with economic analyses that have demonstrated overall cost savings when LMWH is compared to UFH, has resulted in rapidly expanding sales of LMWH, whereas sales of UFH, are in decline. In addition to being more effective than UFH, LMWHs may cause less bleeding, are less likely to cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and exhibit less inter-patient variability. In addition to the savings from reduced monitoring, the greater acquisition costs for LMWHs are also offset by reduced costs of treating adverse effects and unprevented venous thromboembolism. LMWHs are usually administered once daily via the subcutaneous route, and this often allows treatment to be undertaken in the community rather than in hospitals, thereby saving considerable sums on inpatient costs. Pharmacoeconomic analyses are limited by a variety of factors including geographical and temporal variability in cost inputs, cost shifting, cost inputs that are omitted and payer perspective. Some of these limitations, including the economic impact of HIT and the savings in hospital costs, will be discussed. The effect of changes in acquisition costs since their introduction and the potential impact of medicolegal costs, will also be explored. Settings where evidence of benefit of LMWH over UFH is lacking will also be discussed.

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in neonates and children

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a well-known side effect of heparin therapy, occurs with an incidence of 1-2% in certain pediatric patient groups. In affected children, HIT markedly increases the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. The use of alternative anticoagulation with danaparoid, lepirudin and argatroban in adults and children has demonstrated to be safe and could reduce morbidity and mortality also in affected pediatric patients. Thus, in children and neonates, an early diagnosis and accurate management is crucial to avoid the deleterious consequences of HIT. This review article will focus on the presentation of HIT in neonates and children. It reviews the pathophysiology of HIT and it summarizes epidemiological data. Finally important diagnostic and therapeutic issues are discussed.

Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy

Understanding the frequency, risk factors, and management of anticoagulant-induced adverse events will assist clinicians in optimizing patient outcomes. The most frequent adverse event of all anticoagulants is major bleeding. Risk factors for major bleeding have been identified with the heparin compounds, the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), fondaparinux, and warfarin therapy. Understanding these risk factors can help prevent bleeding events. For cases of clinically significant bleeding, reversal agents exist primarily for heparin and warfarin. Although less common, nonbleeding adverse events of anticoagulant therapy can also be life threatening. The heparin compounds are associated with the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. HIT can result in life-threatening thrombosis and is usually managed with a DTI. Nonbleeding adverse events with warfarin therapy include skin reactions and the development of venous limb gangrene. Appropriate initiation of warfarin therapy may decrease the risk of venous limb gangrene.

Ximelagatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), and to review available comparative clinical trial data evaluating its efficacy and safety relative to other antithrombotic agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases (1995-August 2004), supplemented by a manual search of article bibliographies, conference abstracts, and data on file from the manufacturer, was conducted. Key search terms were ximelagatran, melagatran, H376/95, and direct thrombin inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from available clinical trials, including study design, patient demographics, dosing regimens, anticoagulant comparators, methods for evaluating effectiveness, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ximelagatran is an orally administered DTI under development for use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), long-term prevention of a second VTE event, stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation, prevention of VTE after orthopedic procedures, and recurrent ischemic events after acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ximelagatran, in twice-daily doses of 24 or 36 mg, is an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins or warfarin in thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic knee replacement, atrial fibrillation, or initial treatment of VTE. Improved outcomes versus placebo were seen in the long-term prevention of VTE in patients who completed an initial 6 months of treatment. Liver-related effects need further clarification.

Comparing Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Using aPTT, Ecarin Clotting Times, and Thrombin Inhibitor Management Testing

BACKGROUND:

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis may be acutely anticoagulated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). The anticoagulation is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or ecarin clotting time (ECT).

OBJECTIVE:

To compare 14 methods for measuring aPTT, as well as ECT and thrombin inhibitor management test (TIM), in samples containing DTIs.

METHODS:

DTIs were added to pooled normal plasma to achieve low (0.1–1.2 μg/mL) and high (1.5–8.0 μg/mL) drug concentrations. Each low-concentration DTI sample was tested using all aPTT reagents, while each low- and high-concentration DTI was tested using the ECT and TIM.

RESULTS:

All aPTT reagents had a significant dose-dependent correlation with drug concentration. Only Actin FSL and APTT-S demonstrated equivalent aPTT ratios obtained from any DTI. The TAS-aPTT was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to argatroban, with the aPTT ranging from 52.7 to 121.2 seconds corresponding to 0.1 to 1.2 μg/mL of drug concentration. The TAS-aPTT and Pathromtin were the most sensitive aPTT reagents to bivalirudin, with aPTTs of 87.4 seconds and 101.5 seconds, respectively, at 1.2 μg/mL of drug. Pathromtin was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to lepirudin, with a maximum aPTT of 108.9 seconds at 1.2 μg/mL of drug. There was no statistically significant difference between the TIM and ECT clotting times for each DTI. Lepirudin and bivalirudin ECT and TIM clotting times were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are unique differences between reagent manufacturers in the monitoring of DTIs. Acceptable alternatives to aPTT monitoring of DTI anticoagulation include the ECT and TIM.

Special Considerations with Fondaparinux Therapy: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Wound Healing

Multiple options for anticoagulation therapy are now available, placing an additional responsibility on health care workers for choosing the optimal therapy for each patient. The heparins carry a risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune-mediated reaction to heparin that may lead to pulmonary embolism and death. Fondaparinux, a new, synthetic pentasaccharide, binds to antithrombin III and potentiates antithrombin III's inhibition of factor Xa. Fondaparinux does not bind to platelet factor 4 and thus is theoretically unable to cause immunoallergic HIT. Unlike low-molecular-weight heparins, fondaparinux does not cross-react in vitro with sera from patients with clinical cases of HIT. These findings suggest that fondaparinux would not lead to formation of HIT antibodies and would not provoke clinical thrombosis in patients who had HIT antibodies because of previous exposure to heparins. To date, no cases of immunoallergic HIT have been associated with fondaparinux use in clinical trials. Anecdotal evidence suggests that fondaparinux eventually may prove to be valuable for preventing and treating thrombosis in patients with HIT. The effect of anticoagulants on wound healing is another consideration when choosing a thromboprophylactic strategy after major surgery. There is evidence that thrombin plays a role in wound healing, but fondaparinux is too small to enable antithrombin III to inhibit thrombin. Thus, fondaparinux may be less likely than a low-molecular-weight heparin to interfere with wound healing.

Reversal of Direct Thrombin Inhibition After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

We treated persistent hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass in a heart transplant recipient who had received anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin by a combination therapy aimed at reducing the plasma concentration of the thrombin antagonist (hemodialysis and modified ultrafiltration), increasing the concentration of thrombin at bleeding sites (recombinant factor VIIa), and increasing the plasma concentration of other coagulation factors (fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate). The bleeding was controlled, and there was no thrombotic complication.

IMPLICATIONS

A combination of modified ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, and the administration of recombinant factor VIIa, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate may reverse the anticoagulant effect of bivalirudin.

Lepirudin in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of intermediate-probability suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) treated with lepirudin in a patient requiring continuous extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO).

CASE SUMMARY

A 17-year-old girl was admitted with multiple traumatic injuries including severe bilateral pulmonary contusions. Within 48 hours, she developed progressive pulmonary failure despite mechanical ventilation, and was placed on ECMO. Anticoagulation of the ECMO circuit was facilitated by unfractionated heparin (UFH). The platelet count of 116 × 103/mm3 after initiation of ECMO gradually decreased over 5 days to 44 × 103/mm3. On ECMO day 5, a highly positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HIT antibodies was reported, and the UFH infusion was discontinued. Lepirudin was immediately started with a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.12 mg/kg/h, with a target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio approximately 2 times control. The ECMO circuit was maintained without any unexpected bleeding complications or thrombosis for 6 additional days until the patient died secondary to pulmonary failure after ECMO was removed.

DISCUSSION

Use of ECMO typically requires continuous infusion of UFH to keep the circuit from clotting. In patients with HIT, alternative anticoagulation using a direct thrombin inhibitor may be warranted. Lepirudin was effectively used to maintain the circuit despite continued presence of heparin molecules impregnated into the ECMO circuit tubing. The aPTT was successfully used to monitor and adjust the lepirudin infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients requiring ECMO in the presence of HIT, anticoagulation of the ECMO circuit may be accomplished using a continuous infusion of a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndromes

OBJECTIVES

To review the role of antithrombotic therapy for treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the hospital setting.

DATA SOURCES

Recent (1995-2003) published scientific literature, as identified by the authors through Medline searches, using the terms acute coronary syndromes, antithrombotic, antiplatelet, clinical trials, and reviews on treatment.

STUDY SELECTION

Recent systematic English-language review articles and reports of controlled randomized clinical trials were screened for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

For the patient with ST-segment elevation (STE) ACS, nonenteric-coated aspirin should be initiated immediately, if possible before arrival at the emergency department. In-hospital treatment is aimed at rapidly re-establishing coronary patency by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolysis, preventing cardiac complications, and improving survival. Patients undergoing primary PCI should receive a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and clopidogrel (Plavix--Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership) if bypass surgery is not urgently indicated; those undergoing thrombolysis should receive UFH. For the patient with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS, beta-blockers, nitrates (also indicated for STE myocardial infarction), antiplatelet agents, and antithrombin therapy (UFH or low-molecular-weight heparin) are provided in standard care. Aspirin should be commenced immediately and continued indefinitely; in addition, clopidogrel is recommended for patients who are medically managed and those undergoing PCI. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (tirofiban [Aggrastat--Guilford Pharmaceuticals], eptifibatide [Integrilin--Millennium Pharmaceuticals], and abciximab [ReoPro--Lilly]) are of benefit in reducing ischemic complications in patients undergoing PCI.

CONCLUSION

Early reperfusion with thrombolytics or primary PCI is required in patients presenting with STE ACS. Early invasive management is recommended for high-risk patients with NSTE ACS; for lower-risk patients, either early invasive or early conservative therapy is recommended.

Anticoagulation of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The hazards of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery are increasingly being appreciated. Decision-making in favor of an alternative anticoagulation strategy in the complex perioperative setting of cardiac surgery, however, remains a predicament. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current strategies for the treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in this setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the introduction of the direct thrombin inhibitors, approved alternative anticoagulants for pre- and postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis are available. Regarding intraoperative anticoagulation, convincing evidence suggests that, if no heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are present, anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass can be safely performed with unfractionated heparins when the administration of heparin is restricted to the short period of cardiopulmonary bypass. If antibodies are present and surgery cannot be postponed, however, an alternative anticoagulation strategy must be employed. All the currently used strategies, such as administration of direct thrombin inhibitors or the combination of unfractionated heparin with antiplatelet agents, involve three problems: (1) strategies are 'off-label' in this indication; (2) no antidote is available, implying the potential risk of severe hemorrhagic complications; and (3) assays for point-of-care monitoring are not approved or available.

SUMMARY

If possible, surgery should be delayed until antibody titers are negative. However, if antibodies are present and surgery cannot be postponed, in a synoptic approach, the anticoagulation protocol and the surgical strategy must be adjusted to the condition of the patient and the experience of the center in order to reduce the risk of these 'off-label' strategies.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin–Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Child

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of probable acute venous thrombosis caused by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a pediatric patient with a normal platelet count after prolonged enoxaparin therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

An 11-year-old African American female with Crohn's disease developed extensive vena cava thrombosis. Her deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin followed by extended outpatient warfarin therapy. Four months later, the warfarin was stopped and subcutaneous enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg once daily was substituted prior to an elective colonoscopy. She was readmitted 6 weeks later with acute DVT with a platelet count of 233 × 10 3 /mm 3 , significantly lower than the count of 550–700 × 10 3 /mm 3 5 months previously and the count of 433 × 10 3 /mm 3 3 months earlier. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies was strongly positive and a d-dimer was elevated at 2.9 mg/L (normal <1.5). She was treated with lepirudin followed by warfarin when repeat d-dimer on day 3 was normal. An ultrasound at that time showed no clot extension, and the platelet count had risen to >300 × 10 3 /mm 3 . Over the next 4 months, there was no further thrombosis.

DISCUSSION

HIT appears to be rare in the pediatric population, and only a few cases treated with a direct thrombin inhibitor have been reported. This is the first case report to our knowledge of a pediatric patient developing HIT secondary to enoxaparin. An interesting feature of this case is the development of HIT in the face of a normal platelet count, which is rare but has been reported in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin are still at risk for developing HIT. Treatment of HIT should involve the initial use of a direct thrombin inhibitor to manage thrombosis until the platelet count returns to higher values. Once the platelet count returns, warfarin can be used for long-term thrombosis management.