The impact of biologic response modifiers on hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Associated With Therapeutic Interventions

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation associated with various therapeutic interventions is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or resolved HBV infection. Because no curative treatment for HBV infection is yet available, there are many individuals at risk for HBV reactivation in the general population. Populations at risk for HBV reactivation include patients who are currently infected with HBV or who have been exposed to HBV in the past. HBV reactivation and its potential consequences is a concern when these populations are exposed to anti-cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies for the management of various malignancies, rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, or solid-organ or hematologic stem cell transplantation. Accordingly, it has become important to understand the basics of HBV reactivation and the mechanisms by which certain therapies are more susceptible to HBV reactivation. This review aims to raise the awareness of HBV reactivation and to understand the mechanisms and the risks of HBV reactivation in various clinical settings.

Vaccines: Considerations for pediatric dermatology patients on immunosuppressive agents

Pediatric dermatologists should be aware of immunization schedules and special recommendations for patients on immunosuppressive agents due to the increased risk of vaccine-preventable infections. Prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapy, pediatric dermatologists should review a vaccine history and administer any necessary age-appropriate or catch-up vaccines. Live vaccines are typically contraindicated while on immunosuppressive therapy, while inactivated vaccines are generally safe to administer.

Hepatitis B vaccination response of treatment-naive patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

To evaluate the vaccine response of treatment-naive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients who were fully vaccinated against Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and then compare their antibody status with healthy controls. In this multicenter study, initial visit hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) and anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-Hbs) titers of 262 treatment-naive JIA patients who were followed up regularly between May 2015 and October 2019 were evaluated retrospectively from patients' medical records and compared with 276 healthy peers. Both HbsAg and anti-Hbs antibody titers were tested by the ELISA technique. Anti-HBs titers ≥ 10 IU/L were considered as reactive indicating seroprotection against HBV. In the JIA group, seropositivity rate was 59.1% while 72.9% of the control group were immune against HBV (p = 0.002). The median titer for anti-Hbs was 14 (range: 0-1000) IU/L in the patient group and 43.3 (range: 0-1000) IU/L in the control group (p = 0.01). Neither JIA patients nor healthy controls were positive for HbsAg. Patients with JIA vaccinated according to the national vaccination schedule were evaluated at their first visit in pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinics for anti-Hbs presence and it was found that they have lesser seroprotectivity than their age and sex-matched routinely vaccinated, healthy peers. So, to complete missing vaccines and booster vaccine doses, assessing the immune status of the patients at the time of diagnosis against HBV should be in the check-list of physicians dealing with pediatric rheumatic diseases.

From mother to baby: antenatal exposure to monoclonal antibody biologics

INTRODUCTION

More women with autoimmune and inflammatory conditions are being treated with monoclonal antibody biologics (mAbs) during their pregnancy, to maintain clinical remission. The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents in pregnancy appears to be safe but less is known regarding other mAbs, such as anti-integrins and anti-cytokine agents. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines on how to manage the exposed infants. Areas covered: We review recent literature to assess the impact of mAbs on birth and early infant outcomes, including what is currently known about maternal and infant drug levels at birth and drug clearance in the infant. We describe the potential risks of infections and reported hematological and immunological effects of antenatal mAbs exposure on the infant and provide guidance on the management of the exposed infant. Expert opinion: Exposed infants should be monitored closely. Certain mAb exposures require specific testing and management. Safety monitoring should be done in a multidisciplinary approach and should include pediatric care providers. The current clinical experience with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pregnancy cannot be extrapolated to other mAbs. Long-term observational studies and a multicenter international registry are needed to better appreciate the impact of exposure, especially to newer mAbs.

Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus Replication Due to Cytotoxic Therapy: A Five-Year Prospective Study

Background and aims

In hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers receiving chemotherapy, the risk of reactivation is high, particularly if rituximab is given alone or in combination with steroids. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, prevalence, and clinical course of HBV infection in a cohort of patients with hematological malignancies receiving cytotoxic therapy as well as to propose a strategy for managing HBV reactivation.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study. All consecutive patients with hematological malignancies receiving intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy between October 2005 and June 2010 and followed up for at least six months were enrolled in the study. Viral hepatitis markers and liver function indexes were monitored prospectively.

Results

We enrolled 478 patients, including 263 males (55%) and 465 (97.3%) Italians. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was the most frequent diagnosis (66%). At least one HBV marker was positive in 96 patients (20%): 21 (4.4%) patients were HBsAg positive, 17 (3.5%) were anti-HBc positive, and 58 (12.1%) were anti-HBc/anti-HBs positive. All but one HBsAg-positive patient received therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs prior to chemotherapy. All but three reached complete virological suppression at six months from the start of treatment. Of the 17 HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, three (18%) had reactivation with seroreversion. All three obtained viral suppression with adefovir. Regarding the 58 anti-HBc/anti-HBs-positive patients, two (3.4%) experienced seroreversion and were treated successfully with nucleoside analogs; both were taking rituximab. No severe ALT flares were observed during or after antiviral therapy.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that pre-treatment screening of patients at risk of viral reactivation yields benefit and therefore should be practiced by clinicians treating patients with malignancies.

Safety of Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis With Serologic Evidence of Past or Present Hepatitis B Virus Infection

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with concomitant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection represents a therapeutic challenge due to the risk of HBV reactivation under immunosuppressive treatment. To date there are few data coming from anecdotal case reports that concern HBV reactivation following treatment with abatacept. This observational retrospective study was aimed to assess the safety profile of abatacept in this particular clinical setting.

METHODS

Eleven Italian rheumatologic centers provided data from patients with RA and positive HBV serology treated with intravenous abatacept. HBV markers and clinical and laboratory data were checked at followup visits every 3 months.

RESULTS

In total, 72 patients were included in the study: 47 inactive carriers, 21 occult carriers, and 4 chronic active carriers for HBV. At baseline all of the patients had normal liver function tests and low or undetectable HBV DNA levels, except for those with chronic active hepatitis. Thirteen patients received prophylaxis with lamivudine, and 4 received treatment with adefovir or tenofovir. At the end of the 24-month followup period, 49 patients were being treated. Data from 316 followup visits showed that abatacept was safe. No patients experienced reactivation of hepatitis B. Treatment withdrawals (23 patients) were due to lack of efficacy, subject decision/lost at followup, or adverse events not related to HBV infection.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides reassuring data about the safety profile of abatacept in RA with concomitant HBV infection without universal antiviral prophylaxis. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Infectious Complications With the Use of Biologic Response Modifiers in Infants and Children

Biologic response modifiers (BRMs) are substances that interact with and modify the host immune system. BRMs that dampen the immune system are used to treat conditions such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or inflammatory bowel disease and often in combination with other immunosuppressive agents, such as methotrexate and corticosteroids. Cytokines that are targeted include tumor necrosis factor α; interleukins (ILs) 6, 12, and 23; and the receptors for IL-1α (IL-1A) and IL-1β (IL-1B) as well as other molecules. Although the risk varies with the class of BRM, patients receiving immune-dampening BRMs generally are at increased risk of infection or reactivation with mycobacterial infections (Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria), some viral (herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B) and fungal (histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis) infections, as well as other opportunistic infections. The use of BRMs warrants careful determination of infectious risk on the basis of history (including exposure, residence, and travel and immunization history) and selected baseline screening test results. Routine immunizations should be given at least 2 weeks (inactivated or subunit vaccines) or 4 weeks (live vaccines) before initiation of BRMs whenever feasible, and inactivated influenza vaccine should be given annually. Inactivated and subunit vaccines should be given when needed while taking BRMs, but live vaccines should be avoided unless under special circumstances in consultation with an infectious diseases specialist. If the patient develops a febrile or serious respiratory illness during BRM therapy, consideration should be given to stopping the BRM while actively searching for and treating possible infectious causes.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with antirheumatic therapy: Risk and prophylaxis recommendations

Accompanying the increased use of biological and non-biological antirheumatic drugs, a greater number of cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers and also in HBsAg-negative patients who have resolved HBV infection. The prevalence of resolved infection varies in rheumatic disease patients, ranging from 7.3% to 66%. Through an electronic search of the PubMed database, we found that among 712 patients with resolved infection in 17 observational cohort studies, 12 experienced HBV reactivation (1.7%) during biological antirheumatic therapy. Reactivation rates were 2.4% for etanercept therapy, 0.6% for adalimumab, 0% for infliximab, 8.6% for tocilizumab, and 3.3% for rituximab. Regarding non-biological antirheumatic drugs, HBV reactivation was observed in 10 out of 327 patients with resolved infection from five cohort studies (3.2%). Most of these patients received steroids concomitantly. Outcomes were favorable in rheumatic disease patients. A number of recommendations have been established, but most of the supporting evidence was derived from the oncology and transplantation fields. Compared with patients in these fields, rheumatic disease patients continue treatment with multiple immunosuppressants for longer periods. Optimal frequency and duration of HBV-DNA monitoring and reliable markers for discontinuation of nucleoside analogues should be clarified for rheumatic disease patients with resolved HBV infection.

Subcutaneous formulation of tocilizumab for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor that is indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Castleman's disease. TCZ was developed as an intravenous (IV) formulation and approved for RA treatment in Japan (2008), the EU (2009) and the USA (2010). Recently, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of TCZ was developed and approved for RA treatment. Efficacy and safety of TCZ-SC were reported through three randomized trials: MUSASHI, SUMMACTA and BREVACTA. Clinical efficacy and overall safety of TCZ-SC was comparable to that of TCZ-IV. However TCZ-SC, which is provided in a fixed dose, the efficacy was affected by patient weight. The frequencies of injection site reactions and anti-TCZ antibodies were increased with TCZ-SC compared with TCZ-IV, although differences were minimal and at a negligible level for daily clinical practice. This review highlights the potential of TCZ-SC in RA treatment.

Evaluation and management of hepatitis B virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: before and after transplantation

HBV infection remains a major global health problem and continues to be a common cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed individuals. Reactivation of HBV is a serious complication of chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy in patients with HBV infection. In this article, we aim to describe the diagnosis, prevention and management of HBV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant candidates, from the pre- to post-transplant period. The data currently available suggest that all individuals with hemato-/onco-logical malignancies who undergo chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy should be screened for hepatotropic viruses such as HBV and HCV. HBV surface antigen-positive individuals who receive chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy are at considerable risk of HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis prevents HBV reactivation, decreases reactivation-related morbidity and mortality, and prevents interruptions in chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy in such individuals. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains to be elucidated. The vaccination of HBV-naive recipients and their donors against HBV infection prior to transplantation plays an important role in preventing acquired HBV infection. The presence of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity is not an absolute contraindication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Consensus statement on blocking the effects of interleukin-6 and in particular by interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions

BACKGROUND

Since approval of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway inhibition was evaluated in trials of TCZ and other agents targeting the IL-6 receptor and ligand in various RA populations and other inflammatory diseases. This consensus document informs on interference with the IL-6 pathway based on evidence and expert opinion.

METHODS

Preparation of this document involved international experts in RA treatment and RA patients. A systematic literature search was performed that focused on TCZ and other IL6-pathway inhibitors in RA and other diseases. Subsequently, incorporating available published evidence and expert opinion, the steering committee and a broader expert committee (both including RA patients) formulated the current consensus statement.

RESULTS

The consensus statement covers use of TCZ as combination- or monotherapy in various RA populations and includes clinical, functional and structural aspects. The statement also addresses the second approved indication in Europe JIA and non-approved indications. Also early phase trials involving additional agents that target the IL-6 receptor or IL-6 were evaluated. Safety concerns, including haematological, hepatic and metabolic issues as well as infections, are addressed likewise.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus statement identifies points to consider when using TCZ, regarding indications, contraindications, screening, dose, comedication, response evaluation and safety. The document is aimed at supporting clinicians and informing patients, administrators and payers on opportunities and limitations of IL-6 pathway inhibition.

[Immunologic changes in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas after rituximab-CHOP treatment: own data and review of the literature]

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab treatment may induce a long-term B-cell depletion, which can be accompanied with an increased infection risk.

AIMS

To examine the changes of the white blood cell, CD19+ B-cell and CD4+ T-cell counts and the levels of immunoglobulin G, A, M after rituximab containing chemotherapy and to explore the infectious complications in our patients and review of the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients were examined, who were treated with rituximab-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxoribicine-prednisolone (R-CHOP). The B- and T-cell populations were analyzed with flow-cytometry while the immunoglobulin levels were measured by nephelometry.

RESULTS

CD19+ B-lymphocytes were undetectable after the treatment and their count only increased from the post-therapeutic 12th month. Infection did not occur in this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab induced B-cell depletion was appreciable also in this group of patients, while serious or unexpected infection did not occur. Increased infectious risk primarily can be observed after long-term, maintenance rituximab treatment.

Should we routinely treat patients with autoimmune/rheumatic diseases and chronic hepatitis B virus infection starting biologic therapies with antiviral agents? NO

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects a large part of the world population. Different virological HBV categories have been identified and managing strategies for immunosuppressed patients with serological signs of current or past HBV infection has been proposed. Those strategies developed to manage patients in the haematology setting are based on strong evidence. Instead, management of such patients in the rheumatologic setting, especially those treated with biologic response modifiers, is mainly based on data derived by case reports and expert opinions. More data are needed to better manage these patients in case of signs of current or past HBV infection.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation by immunosuppressive therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases: risk analysis in Hepatitis B surface antigen-negative cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) by immunosuppressive therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with autoimmune diseases were included in our study; all were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and antibody against hepatitis B core antigen-positive. They were followed for 8-124 weeks and clinical outcomes were analyzed, including serum levels of HBV-DNA and aminotransferase every 4 weeks during their immunosuppressive therapy for underlying autoimmune diseases. If HBV-DNA was detected during the immunosuppressive therapy, HBsAg, antibody against HBsAg (anti-HBs), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and antibody against HBeAg were also monitored every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

HBV-DNA was detected in 6 out of 35 patients. Anti-HBs titer was significantly lower in the patients in whom HBV-DNA was detected compared with the others at baseline: 2.83 (range 0.24-168.50) mIU/ml vs 99.94 (range 0.00-5342.98) mIU/ml, respectively (p = 0.036). Outcomes of the 6 patients with HBV reactivation were as follows: HBV-DNA turned negative in 2 patients without nucleic acid analog (NAA) and 1 with NAA; 2 died due to bacterial sepsis; and 1 died due to autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Significant elevation of aminotransferase was found in only 1 patient, but HBsAg converted to positive in 2 patients and HBeAg converted to positive in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Reactivation of resolved HBV can occur during standard immunosuppressive therapy for autoimmune diseases. The low titer of baseline anti-HBs may carry its risk.