How safe is infliximab therapy during pregnancy and lactation in inflammatory bowel disease?

The safety of drugs for inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and breastfeeding: the DUMBO registry study protocol of GETECCU

BACKGROUND

Active disease during conception and pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. The use of IBD treatments during pregnancy should be weighed against their adverse effects on the neonate, but longer-term safety data and data on serious infection rates and malignancies postnatally are lacking, particularly for newer drugs, such as tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab.

METHODS

This ongoing, prospective registry study being conducted at 70 centres in Spain is enrolling pregnant women who are ⩾18 years, are at any point in pregnancy up to the end of the second trimester and have a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or unclassified IBD. Patients will receive treatment decided independently by their IBD specialist. Each incident gestation will be followed up through pregnancy and the first 4 years postnatally. Three cohorts will be compared: biologicals exposed, immunomodulatory exposed and non-exposed. The primary endpoint is the risk of severe infection in newborns postnatally up to 4 years of age; other endpoints include serious adverse events (SAEs) such as pregnancy and delivery complications, neonatal SAEs, development [Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ3)], and malignancy incidence, up to 4 years of age. IBD specialists will collect maternal data (baseline/end of each trimester/1 month post-delivery), neonatal birth data, and the SAE and ASQ3 data in children exposed during pregnancy, reported every 3 months by the mother. Statistical analysis will include summary statistics for quantitative variables, comparisons of qualitative variables with significance set at p < 0.025 and a binary logistic regression model to determine the risk factors for severe infections.

RESULTS

Enrolment began in September 2019 and study completion is expected in September 2028.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, controlled study will provide evidence on the long-term safety profile in children after intrauterine and lactation exposure to biological and immunomodulatory IBD treatments, including data on postnatal severe infections, development and malignancies.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03894228.

Safety of New Biologics (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) and Small Molecules (Tofacitinib) During Pregnancy: A Review

Two new biological drugs (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and one small molecule (tofacitinib) have been recently approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, we must be familiar with the safety of these "new" drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. In the present article, we critically review available data on the safety of new biologics (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with special focus on women with inflammatory bowel disease. Bibliographical searches (MEDLINE) up to April 2020 were performed. The timing and mechanisms of placental transfer of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are expected to be similar to anti-TNF agents. Animal studies show no evidence of adverse effects on pre- or post-natal development after administration of vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Just a few studies including patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab during pregnancy have been published, reporting uneventful pregnancies in most cases. The clinical programme of both drugs and post-marketing studies showed no new safety concerns. Due to the expected safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab during pregnancy, it may be recommended to plan the final pregnancy dose approximately 8 or 12 weeks, respectively, before the estimated date of delivery. Live vaccines should be avoided for up to a year in children exposed in utero to vedolizumab or ustekinumab unless drug elimination has been documented. Miniscule amounts of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are transferred to breast milk, so breastfeeding is probably safe. There is no evidence of adverse effect of vedolizumab or ustekinumab paternal exposure. Regarding tofacitinib, it is reasonable to assume that this molecule crosses the placenta from the beginning of pregnancy. In animal studies, tofacitinib was feticidal and teratogenic in rats and rabbits, although at exposures many times greater than the standard human dose. Reported outcomes of pregnancy cases identified from tofacitinib randomised controlled trials, post-approval and non-interventional studies, and spontaneous adverse-event reporting appear similar to those observed in the general population. Nevertheless, at present, the use of tofacitinib during pregnancy should be avoided. Although no human studies have reported outcomes of breastfeeding with small molecules such as tofacitinib, this drug is present in lactating rat milk so, at present, breastfeeding should be avoided. Pregnancy among patients with paternal exposure to tofacitinib appears to be safe. In summary, we can conclude that new biologic agents (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) should be used during pregnancy only if the benefits to the mother outweigh the risks to the mother and unborn child.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Maternal Immune Dysregulation: What We Know So Far

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an obstetric complication that affects approximately 5-10% of all pregnancies worldwide. GDM is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy, and is characterized by exaggerated insulin resistance, a condition which is already pronounced in healthy pregnancies. Maternal hyperglycaemia ensues, instigating a 'glucose stress' response and concurrent systemic inflammation. Previous findings have proposed that both placental and visceral adipose tissue play a part in instigating and mediating this low-grade inflammatory response which involves altered infiltration, differentiation and activation of maternal innate and adaptive immune cells. The resulting maternal immune dysregulation is responsible for exacerbation of the condition and a further reduction in maternal insulin sensitivity. GDM pathology results in maternal and foetal adverse outcomes such as increased susceptibility to diabetes mellitus development and foetal neurological conditions. A clearer understanding of how these pathways originate and evolve will improve therapeutic targeting. In this review, we will explore the existing findings describing maternal immunological adaption in GDM in an attempt to highlight our current understanding of GDM-mediated immune dysregulation and identify areas where further research is required.

Latin American Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis SOLAPSO - Sociedad Latinoamericana de Psoriasis (Latin American Psoriasis Society)

This Clinical Practice Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis includes the recommendations elaborated by a panel of experts from the Latin American Psoriasis Society SOLAPSO, who assessed the quality of the available evidence using the GRADE system and the PICO process to guide the literature search. To answer each question, the experts discussed the results of randomized controlled trials, observational studies and metanalysis evaluating the interventions identified (non-biologics, biologics and phototherapy) in different populations of patients with moderate to severe plaque-psoriasis, which was summarized in Tables ad-hoc. The main end-points considered to assess efficacy were PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100, PGA 0-1 and significant improvement of health-related quality of life. Specific adverse events, either severe or leading to treatment interruption, were also evaluated. The 31 recommendations included in this CPG follow the structure proposed by GRADE: direction (for or against) and strength (strong or weak). The goal of this CPG is to improve the management of patients with psoriasis by recommending interventions of proved benefit and providing a reference standard for the treating physician. Adhering to the contents of this CPG does not guarantee therapeutic success. The final decision on the specific treatment is the responsibility of the physician based on the individual circumstances and considering the values, the preferences and the opinions of the patient or caregivers.

Use of synthetic and biologic DMARDs during pregnancy

Introduction: Since most of the autoimmune diseases (AID) affect mostly women in their fertile years, and fertility is in general preserved, the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during conception, pregnancy, and lactation has been a matter of concern in the treatment of women affected by AID. Areas covered: We performed a comprehensive review of the latest and most relevant research papers published in the field and discussed different aspects related to the use of synthetic and biologic DMARDs and immunosuppressants in the preconceptional period, during pregnancy and lactation in AID patients, both in males and females. Expert commentary: Active AID impose an increased risk for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, such as preeclampsia, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity, low birth weight, and stillbirth. Family planning with proper contraception and shared decision-making on the ideal time to conceive with treatment adjustment must be a rule. One of the main challenges when counseling and/or adjusting treatment of patients that are planning a pregnancy is to provide a medication that is at the same time efficacious and safe at the conceptional period and to developing the fetus.

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation Topical Review on Treatment Withdrawal ['Exit Strategies'] in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Clinically effective therapies now exist for remission maintenance in both ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]. For each major class of IBD medications [5-aminosalicyclates, immunomodulators, and biologic agents], used alone or in combination, there is a risk of relapse following reduction or cessation of treatment. A consensus expert panel convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] reviewed the published literature and agreed a series of consensus practice points. The objective of the expert consensus is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice so that physicians can make informed decisions in partnership with their patients. The likelihood of relapse with stopping each class of IBD medication is reviewed. Factors associated with an altered risk of relapse with withdrawal are evaluated, and strategies to monitor and allow early identification of relapse are considered. In general, patients in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission are more likely to remain well when treatments are stopped. Reintroduction of the same treatment is usually, but not always, successful. The decision to stop a treatment needs to be individualized, and shared decision making with the patient should take place.

A safety assessment of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for treatment of Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy has revolutionized the medical treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, anti-TNF-α therapy has been associated with serious adverse events (SAE) raising safety concerns. This review focuses on the safety profile of anti-TNF-α agents in CD.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search until August 2015 to collect safety data on infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol monotherapy or combined with immunomodulators (IMM). We have mainly focused on infections and malignancies. Safety in pregnancy, the elderly and children are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Available data in CD suggest that anti-TNF-α monotherapy or in combination with IMM is relatively safe, although it may be associated with an elevated risk of serious infections, skin cancer and lymphoma. However, as this data derive mainly from cohort studies, post-marketing registries, and meta-analyses of RCTs, often characterized by inherited methodological weaknesses that may hinder their validity, data from large, statistically powered, prospective studies of sufficient follow up are required to define the actual risk of SAE during anti-TNF-α therapy in IBD. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting and preventing SAE awaits confirmation.

Systematic review: factors associated with relapse of inflammatory bowel disease after discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy

BACKGROUND

The discontinuation of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in remission could be considered.

AIM

To evaluate the factors associated with relapse of IBD after discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

Electronic (PubMed/Embase) and manual search up to January 2015.

RESULTS

The overall risk of relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNFs (27 studies) was 44% for Crohn's disease (CD; follow-up range: 6-125 months) and 38% for ulcerative colitis (follow-up range: 6-24 months). Several factors were investigated to identify patients who are more likely to achieve long-lasting remission after anti-TNF discontinuation. The factors associated with a higher risk of relapse are younger age, smoking, longer disease duration, and fistulising perianal CD. Laboratory markers such as low haemoglobin levels, high C-reactive protein levels and high faecal calprotectin seem to increase the risk of relapse. On the other hand, low serum anti-TNF levels seem to be associated with a lower risk of flare-up. Mucosal healing seems to decrease the risk of relapse after anti-TNF discontinuation (overall, this risk is 26% at 1 year with mucosal healing and 42% without), although this observation has not been confirmed by some authors. In patients receiving escalated anti-TNF doses or receiving anti-TNFs for the prevention of post-operative CD recurrence, the risk of relapse after discontinuation is high (>75%). Re-administration of the drug in those who relapsed after stopping treatment is effective and safe.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients with IBD relapse after discontinuation of anti-TNF treatment. As available data are insufficient to make strong recommendations on when anti-TNF therapy could be stopped, decisions should be taken on an individual basis.