Is there really a link between benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia?

The Role of the Neural Exposome as a Novel Strategy to Identify and Mitigate Health Inequities in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

With the continuous increase of the elderly population, there is an urgency to understand and develop relevant treatments for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). In tandem with this, the prevalence of health inequities continues to rise as disadvantaged communities fail to be included in mainstream research. The neural exposome poses as a relevant mechanistic approach and tool for investigating ADRD onset, progression, and pathology as it accounts for several different factors: exogenous, endogenous, and behavioral. Consequently, through the neural exposome, health inequities can be addressed in ADRD research. In this paper, we address how the neural exposome relates to ADRD by contributing to the discourse through defining how the neural exposome can be developed as a tool in accordance with machine learning. Through this, machine learning can allow for developing a greater insight into the application of transferring and making sense of experimental mouse models exposed to health inequities and potentially relate it to humans. The overall goal moving beyond this paper is to define a multitude of potential factors that can increase the risk of ADRD onset and integrate them to create an interdisciplinary approach to the study of ADRD and subsequently translate the findings to clinical research.

Benzodiazepine use in relation to long-term dementia risk and imaging markers of neurodegeneration: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine use is common, particularly in older adults. Benzodiazepines have well-established acute adverse effects on cognition, but long-term effects on neurodegeneration and dementia risk remain uncertain.

METHODS

We included 5443 cognitively healthy (MMSE ≥ 26) participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (57.4% women, mean age 70.6 years). Benzodiazepine use from 1991 until baseline (2005-2008) was derived from pharmacy dispensing records, from which we determined drug type and cumulative dose. Benzodiazepine use was defined as prescription of anxiolytics (ATC-code: N05BA) or sedative-hypnotics (ATC-code: N05CD) between inception of pharmacy records and study baseline. Cumulative dose was calculated as the sum of the defined daily doses for all prescriptions. We determined the association with dementia risk until 2020 using Cox regression. Among 4836 participants with repeated brain MRI, we further determined the association of benzodiazepine use with changes in neuroimaging markers using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Of all 5443 participants, 2697 (49.5%) had used benzodiazepines at any time in the 15 years preceding baseline, of whom 1263 (46.8%) used anxiolytics, 530 (19.7%) sedative-hypnotics, and 904 (33.5%) used both; 345 (12.8%) participants were still using at baseline assessment. During a mean follow-up of 11.2 years, 726 participants (13.3%) developed dementia. Overall, use of benzodiazepines was not associated with dementia risk compared to never use (HR [95% CI]: 1.06 [0.90-1.25]), irrespective of cumulative dose. Risk estimates were somewhat higher for any use of anxiolytics than for sedative-hypnotics (HR 1.17 [0.96-1.41] vs 0.92 [0.70-1.21]), with strongest associations for high cumulative dose of anxiolytics (HR [95% CI] 1.33 [1.04-1.71]). In imaging analyses, current use of benzodiazepine was associated cross-sectionally with lower brain volumes of the hippocampus, amygdala, and thalamus and longitudinally with accelerated volume loss of the hippocampus and to a lesser extent amygdala. However, imaging findings did not differ by type of benzodiazepines or cumulative dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based sample of cognitively healthy adults, overall use of benzodiazepines was not associated with increased dementia risk, but potential class-dependent adverse effects and associations with subclinical markers of neurodegeneration may warrant further investigation.

Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia: A Mini Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.

METHODS

Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).

RESULTS

The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.

Elevated prevalence and treatment of sleep disorders from 2011 to 2020: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Korea

OBJECTIVES

This study used National Health Insurance claims data from Korea to report the prevalence of sleep disorders and treatment status, including traditional Korean medicine, in the last 10 years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in Korea. All diagnosis and prescription data, including herbal medicine claims, from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed. Prevalence estimation, direct medical expenses and prescribed amounts for sleep disorders were recorded.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sleep disorders increased from 3 867 975 (7.62%) in 2011 to 7 446 846 (14.41%) in 2020, nearly doubling over 10 years. Insomnia was observed in 91.44% (n=9 011 692) of the patients. The mean number of hospital visits per patient for sleep disorders was 11.5 (±26.62). Benzodiazepines are the most commonly prescribed medications for sleep disorders, and gamma-isoyosan is the most frequently prescribed herbal medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disorders are continuously increasing, as is the use of medical services-personal and social medical expenses are also increasing accordingly. Sleep disorders should be recognised as a significant health problem that needs to be actively addressed to improve quality of life.

Benzodiazepine Use and the Risk of Dementia in the Elderly Population: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses

The prevalence of dementia among the elderly is high, and it is the leading cause of death globally. However, the relationship between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk has produced inconsistent results, necessitating an updated review of the evidence. To address this, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses to summarize the available evidence on the association between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk and evaluate its credibility. We systematically evaluated the meta-analyses of observational studies that examined the connection between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk. For each meta-analysis, we collected the overall effect size, heterogeneity, risk of bias, and year of the most recent article and graded the evidence based on pre-specified criteria. We also used AMSTAR, a measurement tool to evaluate systematic reviews, to assess the methodological quality of each study. Our review included five meta-analyses encompassing 30 studies, and the effect size of the association between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk ranged from 1.38 to 1.78. Nonetheless, the evidence supporting this relationship was weak, and the methodological quality of the studies included was low. In conclusion, our findings revealed limited evidence of a link between benzodiazepine use and dementia risk, and more research is required to determine a causal connection. Physicians should only prescribe benzodiazepine for appropriate indications.

Global trends in the consumption of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in 67 countries and regions from 2008 to 2018: a sales data analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To investigate the trends in the consumption of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs at global, regional, and national levels from 2008 to 2018, across 67 countries and regions.

METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study investigated the consumption of BZDs and Z-drugs analyzed by global pharmaceutical sales data from the IQVIA-Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System database between 2008 and 2018. Consumption was measured in defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID). The global, regional, and national trends were estimated using linear mixed models. Additional analyses were conducted by grouping countries by income level. The association between consumption and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the prevalence of different medical conditions was explored in univariable linear models.

RESULTS

BZD consumption decreased annually by -1.88% (95% CI: -2.27%, -1.48%), and Z-drugs increased by + 3.28% (+2.55%, +4.01%). In 2008, the top ten countries for BZD and Z-drug consumption were all European, ranging from 63.69 to 128.24 DDD/TID. Very low levels were found in Russia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, French West Africa, and the Philippines, with DDD/TID < 1. The consumption in high-income countries was much higher than in middle-income countries. The results showed that increased consumption of BZDs and Z-drugs was statistically associated (p < 0.05) with higher GDP and increased prevalence of anxiety, self-harm, neurological disorders, chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct differences in consumption and trends of BZDs and Z-drugs were found across different countries and regions. Further exploration is needed to understand the association and safety of the use of BZDs and Z-drugs in patients with comorbidities.

Trajectories of Benzodiazepine Use among Older Adults from a Concordance-with-Guidelines Perspective: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines (including zolpidem and zopiclone) are often associated with higher-than-recommended intake and durations of use, especially in older adults. The objective of this study was to characterize trajectories of benzodiazepine use according to recommended patterns in older adults, and to assess predictors of the risk of developing each of these trajectories.

METHODS

Using the French Health Insurance database, we constituted a cohort of adults aged ≥ 65 years who initiated benzodiazepines in 2007 and were followed for up to 8 years. Concordance with benzodiazepine use guidelines was assessed on a quarterly basis according to a "concordance-with-guideline score" with values 1-5. Group-based trajectory modeling was then applied as implemented in the Proc Traj procedure in SAS to define guideline-concordant trajectories based on seven baseline patient-centered characteristics: sex, complementary health insurance coverage, treated alcohol and tobacco use disorder, polypharmacy, hospital stay, and registered chronic diseases.

RESULTS

Among 5080 new users (64.1% women, median age 74 years), six trajectories of benzodiazepine use were identified. Three, representing 70% of users, were concordant with guidelines, whereas three implied non-concordant benzodiazepine use for part or all of the benzodiazepine use follow-up. Polymedicated patients were more prone to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant initially guideline-concordant use, whereas those with a history of long-term disease and hospitalization were more likely to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant use. The number of prescribers during the first quarter, number of daily defined doses, use of loperamide, and use of psychostimulants were associated with a higher risk of developing an initial and persistent non-guideline-concordant use. Treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, initial use of World Health Organization (WHO) step-2 opioids and non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics or sedatives were associated with a higher risk of late non-guideline-concordant use.

CONCLUSIONS

Concordance with guidelines varied over time during benzodiazepine use in older adults. A third of these adults will hypothetically follow one of the identified non-guideline-concordant trajectories, consisting of initial and/or late non-guideline concordance. This was associated with modifiable and nonmodifiable factors that clinicians should be aware of for tailoring the monitoring of patients.

Benzodiazepines and Sleep Architecture: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Insomnia, defined as a difficulty in initiating or maintaining sleep, is a relevant medical issue. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly prescribed to treat insomnia. Two phases characterize human sleep structure: sleep with Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) and sleep with Rapid Eye Movement (REM). Physiological sleep includes NREM and REM phases in a continuous cycle known as "Sleep Architecture."

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review summarizes the studies that have investigated effects of BZDs on Sleep Architecture.

METHODS

The articles selection included human clinical trials (in English, Portuguese, or Spanish) only, specifically focused on BZDs effects on sleep architecture. PubMed, BVS, and Google Scholar databases were searched.

RESULTS

Findings on BZDs effects on sleep architecture confirm an increase in stage 2 of NREM sleep and a decrease in time of stages 3 and 4 of NREM sleep with a reduction in time of REM sleep during the nocturnal sleep.

CONCLUSION

Variations in NREM and REM sleep may lead to deficits in concentration and working memory and weight gain. The increase in stage 2 of NREM sleep may lead to a subjective improvement of sleep quality with no awakenings. BZDz should be prescribed with zeal and professional judgment. These patients should be closely monitored for possible long-term side effects.

Evolution of benzodiazepine receptor agonist prescriptions in general practice: A registry-based study

Background

Contrary to most European guidelines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRA) are often used continuously at a low dosage, being the most common form of long-term use. In Belgium, BZRA use is monitored by analyzing self-report data about medication use in the last 24 h. This method provides insufficient insight into the terms of use of these psychoactive drugs.

Aim

To describe trends in BZRA prescribing in Flanders, Belgium, between 2000 and 2019.

Design and setting

Population-based trend analysis and a case-control study for the year 2019 were done with data from a morbidity registry in general practice.

Methods

Repeated cross-sectional and joinpoint regression analyses revealed trends in sex- and age-standardized prescription rates among adult patients (18+).

Results

Overall, BZRA prescriptions increased. The highest overall increase was found among male patients 18-44 years old, with an average annual percentage change of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 4.3). Among 65+ female patients, a decrease was found since 2006, with an annual percentage change of -0.7 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.1). In 2019, 12% of registered patients received minimally one prescription, long-term use was observed in 5%, back pain was the most common morbidity significantly associated with a rise in BZRA prescriptions, and zolpidem was the most prescribed BZRA (22%).

Conclusion

Despite some statistically significant decreasing trends, an overall increase in BZRA prescriptions was observed throughout the 19-year study period, especially among long-term users of 18-44 years and 65-plus. Zolpidem became the most prescribed BZRA and warrants more attention.

Benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia

Introduction

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly prescribed for anxiety and agitations, which are early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). It is unclear whether BZDs causally affect ADRD risk or are prescribed in response to early symptoms of dementia.

Methods

We replicate prior case-control studies using longitudinal Medicare claims. To mitigate bias from prodromal use, we compare rates of ADRD diagnosis for beneficiaries exposed and unexposed to BZDs for cervical/lumbar pain, stenosis, and sciatica, none of which are associated with dementia.

Results

Approximately 8% of Medicare beneficiaries used a BZD in 2007, increasing to nearly 13% by 2013. Estimates from case-control designs are sensitive to duration of look-back period, health histories, medication use, and exclusion of decedents. Incident BZD use is not associated with an increased risk of dementia in an "uncontaminated" sample of beneficiaries prescribed a BZD for pain (odds ratios (ORs) of 1.007 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.885, 1.146] and 0.986 [95% CI = 0.877, 1.108], respectively, in the 2013 and 2013 to 2015 pooled samples). Higher levels of BZD exposure (>365 days over a 2-year period) are associated with increased odds of a dementia diagnosis, but the results are not statistically significant at the 5% or 10% levels (1.190 [95% CI = 0.925, 1.531] and 1.167 [95% CI = 0.919, 1.483]).

Discussion

We find little evidence of a causal relation between BZD use and dementia risk. Nonetheless, providers should limit the extended use in elderly populations.

Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy to Improve Sleep Quality in Older Adults with Insomnia

There is a high prevalence of insomnia in older adults, which has negative consequences for their well-being and quality of life. The recommendation for first-line treatments is to administer non-pharmacological interventions. The objective of this research was to verify the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in older adults with subclinical and moderate insomnia, studying its impact on sleep quality. One hundred and six older adults participated and were assigned to the subclinical insomnia (n = 50) or moderate insomnia (n = 56) groups; subsequently, they were randomly assigned to the control and intervention groups. Subjects were evaluated at two times with the Insomnia Severity Index and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Significant results were obtained on both scales, with a reduction in insomnia symptoms in the subclinical and moderate intervention groups. The administration of a treatment that combines mindfulness and cognitive therapy is effective for treating insomnia in older adults.

Entrapment of Binaural Auditory Beats in Subjects with Symptoms of Insomnia

Binaural beat (BB) stimulation, which has two different frequencies for each ear, is reportedly effective in reducing anxiety and controlling mood. This study aimed to evaluate the brain wave entrainment effect of binaural beats and to propose an effective and safe supplementary therapy for relieving the symptoms of insomnia. Subjects between 20 and 59 years of age with subclinical symptoms of insomnia were recruited from the community. Quantitative electroencephalography was measured twice, before and two weeks after the BB intervention. Participants used the apparatus with or without 6 Hz BB for 30 min before going to bed for two weeks. When music with BB was played, the relative theta power increased (occipital, p = 0.009). After two weeks of intervention with music, the theta power increased when listening to music with BB (parietal, p = 0.009). After listening to music with BB for two weeks, the decrease in the beta power was more noticeable than after using music-only devices when participants listened to music in the laboratory (occipital, p = 0.035). When BB were played, the entrapment of the theta wave appeared. Therefore, exposure to music with BB is likely to reduce the hyper-arousal state and contribute to sleep induction.

The risk of dementia in patients using psychotropic drugs: Antidepressants, mood stabilizers or antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

The risk of dementia associated with the use of psychotropic drugs is not fully understood. A nested case-control study was carried out to assess the risk of dementia broadly defined or Alzheimer's disease associated with antidepressants, mood stabilizers or antipsychotics.

METHODS

A cohort was formed from healthcare claim databases including all patients aged 50 and over with a first dispensing of the psychotropic drugs concerned between 2006 and 2017. Patients who developed dementia over the study period were considered as cases. The association between drug exposure prior to a five-year lag time and diagnosis of dementia was assessed by conditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

No association was found between dementia, either broadly defined or Alzheimer disease, and antidepressant or mood stabilizers. Findings were conflicting with regard to antipsychotics. First- and second-generation antipsychotics (FGA and SGA) were not associated with Alzheimer disease. SGA treatments of more than 3 months were associated with a higher risk of dementia broadly defined than no use of antipsychotics (Odds ratio [OR] 2.00; 95%CI 1.06-3.79; p = 0.03). In a sensitivity analysis using a lag time of 3 years, ever use of SGA and SGA treatments of more than 3 months were associated with a higher risk of dementia broadly defined than no use of antipsychotics (OR 1.71; 1.10-2.67; p = 0.02 and OR 1.84; 1.03-3.32; p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The association between antipsychotics and dementia should be further investigated to establish patients, specific drugs, and patterns of treatment at risk. Prescribers should remain cautious when prescribing them.

Benzodiazepine and Z-Drug Use and the Risk of Developing Dementia

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (BZDRs) are among the most prescribed medications for anxiety and insomnia, especially among older adults. Our objective was to investigate the association between the use of BZDRs and the risk of dementia.

METHODS

A community-based retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the data available from 2002 to 2015 in Catalan Health Service. This cohort included all BZDR users (N = 83 138) and nonusers (N = 84 652) older than 45 years. A minimum 5-year lag window and an adjustment for psychiatric problems were applied for the data analysis.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio (HR) for the risk of incident dementia among BZDR users was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.15 to 1.31). This risk was not significant after adjusting the data confounding factors (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.08). We observed a higher risk with short-to-intermediate half-life BZDs (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.20) and Z-drugs (HR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.33) than for intermediate-to-long half-life BZDs (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.08). We demonstrated a higher risk of incident dementia (HR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.41 and odds ratio = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.50, respectively) in patients who received 91 to 180 defined daily doses (DDDs) and >180 DDDs compared with patients who received <90 DDD. Regarding patient sex, the risk of dementia was higher in women than in men.

CONCLUSION

We found that the incidence of dementia was not higher among all BZDR users. Short half-life BZDs and Z-drugs increased the risk of dementia at the highest doses, especially in female patients, showing a dose-response relationship.

Is there a link between the use of benzodiazepines and related drugs and dementia? A systematic review of reviews

PURPOSE

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and related drugs (BZRDs) are commonly used to treat diverse psychiatric disorders due to their anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative properties, despite their known associated side effects, including acute consequences on cognition. Recently, some studies have also suggested that long-term cognitive effects may coexist, as the increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. This review aims to appraise and summarise published synthesis studies on the risk of dementia development due to BZDs/BZRDs use.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases. Grey literature and hand search of the studies' reference lists were undertaken. Meta-analysis, systematic and non-systematic reviews were included. Neither language nor date restrictions were applied. Search results other than synthesis studies were excluded. The methodological quality of the included reviews was analysed with AMSTAR-2 and SANRA tools.

RESULTS

Overall, 877 records were initially retrieved and 15 complied with the inclusion criteria. From these, five were systematic reviews with meta-analysis, two were systematic reviews and eight were non-systematic reviews. Most of the primary studies included in the analysed reviews found an association between BZDs/BZRDs use and subsequent dementia, with meta-analysis studies reporting an increased risk for users (ORs ranging from 1.38 to 1.78). However, the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the primary studies makes it difficult to establish a causal relationship.

CONCLUSION

Although hampered by the heterogeneity between the studies, the present findings suggest an association between BZDs/BZRDs use and increased risk of dementia in older adults.

Transtornos de Ansiedade em Idosos

Objetivos: descrever a prevalência de transtornos de ansiedade e avaliar o perfil e os fatores associados em uma amostra de idosos atendidos no ambulatório de psiquiatria geriátrica de um hospital de Porto Alegre, Brasil.Métodos: trata-se de um estudo transversal que avaliou 69 idosos com diagnóstico de transtornos de ansiedade, atendidos no ambulatório de psiquiatria geriátrica, no período de 2014 a 2019.Resultados: a prevalência de transtornos de ansiedade foi de 21,9% e a média de idade 73,4±8,7 anos. Houve predomínio de indivíduos do sexo feminino (81,2%), com 5 a 8 anos de estudo (33,8%), casados (47,7%) e residentes de Porto Alegre (65,2%). Em relação a variáveis clínicas, a maior frequência dos idosos não apresentaram histórico familiar de doença ou de internação psiquiátrica. Do total, 92,6% relataram ter alguma comorbidade clínica, sendo a mais frequente as doenças cardiovasculares (69,8%). Os principais psicofármacos utilizados foram os antidepressivos (66,7%) e os benzodiazepínicos (44,9%).Conclusões: os transtornos de ansiedade são frequentes entre os idosos. Dessa forma, são necessários mais estudos na população geriátrica e padronizações das ferramentas de avaliação.

Age-Specific Prevalence and Incidence of Dementia Diagnoses Among Older US Adults With Schizophrenia

IMPORTANCE

People with schizophrenia are at high risk of receiving a diagnosis of dementia. Understanding the magnitude and timing of this increased risk has important implications for practice and policy.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the age-specific incidence and prevalence of dementia diagnoses among older US adults with schizophrenia and in a comparison group without serious mental illness (SMI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used a 50% random national sample of Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older with fee-for-service plans and Part D prescription drug coverage from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. The cohort with schizophrenia included adults with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D and at least 2 outpatient claims or at least 1 inpatient claim for schizophrenia during the qualifying years. The comparison group included adults with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D and without a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or recurrent major depressive disorder during the qualifying year. Data were analyzed from January 1 to July 31, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Dementia was defined using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse diagnosis codes for Alzheimer disease and related disorders or senile dementia. Incident diagnoses were defined by at least 12 consecutive eligible months without a qualifying code before meeting dementia criteria.

RESULTS

The study population of 8 011 773 adults 66 years or older (63.4% women; mean [SD] age, 74.0 [8.2] years) included 74 170 individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (56.6% women) and 7 937 603 without an SMI diagnosis (63.5% women) who contributed 336 814 and 55 499 543 person-years of follow-up, respectively. At 66 years of age, the prevalence of diagnosed dementia was 27.9% (17 640 of 63 287) among individuals with schizophrenia compared with 1.3% (31 295 of 2 389 512) in the group without SMI. By 80 years of age, the prevalence of dementia diagnoses was 70.2% (2011 of 2866) in the group with schizophrenia and 11.3% (242 094 of 2 134 602) in the group without SMI. The annual incidence of dementia diagnoses per 1000 person-years at 66 years of age was 52.5 (95% CI, 50.1-54.9) among individuals with schizophrenia and 4.5 (95% CI, 4.4-4.6) among individuals without SMI and increased to 216.2 (95% CI, 179.9-252.6) and 32.3 (95% CI, 32.0-32.6), respectively, by 80 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, compared with older adults without SMI, those with schizophrenia had increased risk of receiving a diagnosis of dementia across a wide age range, possibly because of cognitive and functional deterioration related to schizophrenia or factors contributing to other types of dementia. High rates of dementia among adults with schizophrenia have implications for the course of illness, treatment, and service use.

Benzodiazepines and antidepressants: Effects on cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia

OBJECTIVES

We aim to study the effects of the prescription of benzodiazepines and antidepressants on cognitive and functional decline in older adults living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD) over a 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal analysis of a Norwegian cohort study entitled "The Dementia Study of Western Norway" (DemVest). We included 196 patients newly diagnosed with AD (n = 111) and LBD (n = 85), followed annually for 5 years. Three prescription groups were defined: only benzodiazepines (BZD), only antidepressants (ADep), and the combination of benzodiazepines and antidepressants (BZD-ADep). Linear mixed-effects models were conducted to analyze the effect of the defined groups on the outcomes. The outcomes were functional decline, measured by the Rapid Disability Rating Scale-2, and cognition measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination.

RESULTS

Prescription of the combination of benzodiazepines and antidepressants in LBD was associated with faster functional decline. In AD, the prescription of BZD and BZD-ADep was associated with greater functional deterioration. ADep alone did not show positive or negative significant associations with the studied outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

BZD and especially the combination of BZD and ADep are associated with functional decline in AD and LBD and should be used cautiously.

Opioid painkiller dependence in a sample of elderly medical inpatients

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, there has been a growing concern about prescription opioid misuse and dependence in the elderly. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of previous and current prescription opioid dependence among elderly medical inpatients recruited from a large German hospital.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed a cohort of inpatients aged 65 years and older who were assessed with a structured clinical interview. Levels of past and current dependence on opioids benzodiazepines, hypnotics, and non-opioid analgesics were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 2108 elderly inpatients admitted to the hospital during a 6-month period, 400 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate to the survey. Among these 400 subjects, 43 (10.8%) presented with a dependence on opioid analgesics, including 41 with current dependence and 22 (51.2%) with a de novo condition. Addiction severity was considered mild in 65.1% of cases and severe in 11.6% of cases. Tilidine and oxycodone were the most typically reported molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is warranted, to better understand the possible risk factors of prescription drug misuse, abuse, and addiction in this vulnerable population. Clinicians should be updated and informed regarding both prescription medication misuse potential and safe prescribing practices in the elderly.

Korean Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Insomnia in Adults

OBJECTIVE

We aim to present a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia in adults by reviewing and integrating existing clinical guidelines. The purpose of this guideline is to assist clinicians who perform evidence-based insomnia treatment.

METHODS

We selected literature that may be appropriate for use in guideline development from evidence-based practice guidelines that have been issued by an academic or governmental institution within the last five years. The core question of this guideline was made in sentence form including Patient/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) elements. After searching PubMed, EMBASE, and medical guideline issuing agencies, three guidelines were judged to be the most appropriately reviewed, up-to-date, and from trusted sources.

RESULTS

The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool was used to evaluate the quality of the three clinical guidelines. The final outcome of the guideline development process is a total of 15 recommendations that report the strength of the recommendation, the quality of evidence, a summary of content, and considerations in applying the recommendation.

CONCLUSION

It is vital for clinical guidelines for insomnia to be developed and continually updated in order to provide more accurate evidence-based treatments to patients.

Impact of benzodiazepine consumption reduction on future burden of dementia

Dementia is a major public health issue worldwide and chronic use of benzodiazepine, which is very frequent in northern countries, was found to be a risk factor of dementia. This work aims at evaluating the impact of a reduction in chronic use of benzodiazepine on the future burden of dementia in France. Using estimations of dementia incidence and of benzodiazepine use and nation-wide projections of mortality and population sizes, a Monte Carlo approach based on an illness-death model provided projections of several indicators of dementia burden. With no change in benzodiazepine consumption, the prevalence of dementia between age 65 and 99 in France in 2040 was estimated at 2.16 millions (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93-2.38), with a life expectancy without dementia at 65 years equal to 25.0 years (24.7-25.3) for women and 23.8 years (23.5-24.2) for men. Assuming a disappearance of chronic use of benzodiazepine in 2020, the prevalence would be reduced by about 6.6% in 2040 and the life expectancy without dementia would increase by 0.99 (0.93-1.06) year among women and 0.56 (0.50-0.62) among men. To conclude, a modest but significant reduction in future dementia burden could be obtained by applying current recommendation for duration of benzodiazepine use.

Benzodiazépines et risque de démence chez les sujets âgés

Plusieurs études ont conclu à une augmentation du risque de démence chez les personnes âgées ayant utilisé des benzodiazépines . Ces médicaments méritent une attention particulière du fait de :

– leur utilisation trop systématique et le plus souvent chronique contrairement aux recommandations d’usage ;

– leurs effets délétères sur la cognition, mal évalués à long terme.

Un biais protopathique pouvait cependant, en partie du moins, avoir expliqué ces résultats : la prescription de benzodiazépines pouvait avoir été motivée par des prodromes souvent observés au cours des années précédant le diagnostic de la maladie. Afin de mieux prendre en considération ce biais, le projet BENZODEM a utilisé les ressources de la cohorte PAQUID (3777 sujets ≥ 65 ans tirés au sort sur les listes électorales de Dordogne et Gironde bénéficiant d’un suivi de plus de 20 ans). Ce projet, combinant deux études de cohorte et une étude cas-témoins, a conclu à un risque de démence augmenté de 46 à 62 % chez les utilisateurs de benzodiazépines et retardé de 5 à 15 ans par rapport à l’initiation du traitement . Un second programme (BENZODEM2) a consisté en une étude cas-témoins conduite sur un large échantillon de sujets de plus de 65 ans enregistrés sur la base de données de la régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Ce programme a permis :

– de valider les précédents résultats (risque augmenté de 30 à 80 % en fonction de la dose, la durée du traitement et la nature des molécules) ;

– d’identifier les profils de consommation associés à un excès de risque : consommateurs de plus de 3 mois avec une relation dose–effet marquée et molécules à longue demi-vie d’élimination .

Des explorations complémentaires ont permis de conclure que cet excès de risque n’était pas expliqué par une mortalité différentielle entre groupes comparés ni par la prescription d’autres médicaments psychotropes.

Association Between the Use of Non-benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Cognitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Purpose of Review

Adverse effects of sedative-hypnotic medications on cognition are concerning. Past studies have examined benzodiazepine (BZD) use and cognitive outcomes; however, few studies have examined newer non-BZD hypnotic agents (nBHs; e.g. zolpidem). This systematic review examined observational studies assessing the association between nBH use and cognitive outcomes.

Recent Findings

Five studies met eligibility requirements and were included in the review. Most studies did not find an association between nBH use and dementia diagnosis; however, we found no studies assessing other cognitive outcomes such as cognitive performance (e.g., word recall tasks). Characterization of nBH use mostly consisted of incident new use; one study assessed nBH dosing; none examined duration of use. Studies included were of strong quality.

Summary

This review found no association between nBH use and dementia diagnosis, although there is a need for more research on more cognitive outcomes and nBH use patterns.

Polypharmacy in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder characterized by a heterogeneous symptom profile which comprises a clinical platform for widespread use of polypharmacy even though antipsychotic monotherapy is the recommended treatment regimen. This narrative review provides a summary of the current gap between evidence and practice for use of antipsychotic combination therapy in patients with schizophrenia. Antipsychotic polypharmacy is frequently prescribed instead of following international consensus of clozapine monotherapy in treatment-resistant patients. Antipsychotic-benzodiazepine combination therapy clearly has a role in the treatment of acute agitation whereas there is no evidence to support an effect on core schizophrenia symptoms when chronically prescribed. Antidepressants are typically added to antipsychotic treatment in case of persistent negative symptoms. Available evidence suggests that antidepressants may improve negative symptom control in schizophrenia. Combining an antipsychotic with an antiepileptic is not supported by any firm evidence, but individual mood stabilizers have come out positively in single trials. Generally, the evidence base for polypharmacy in schizophrenia maintenance treatment is sparse but may be warranted in certain clinical situations. Therapeutic benefits and side effects should be carefully monitored and considered to ensure a beneficial risk-benefit ratio if prescribing polypharmacy for specific clinical indications.

Misuse of benzodiazepines: Prevalence and impact in an inpatient population with psychiatric disorders

AIMS

Use and misuse of benzodiazepine might be very prevalent in patients with acute psychiatric symptoms, whereas they might be associated with specific adverse events in this population. The study investigated their prevalence in these patients. Secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for misuse of benzodiazepines, and its impact.

METHODS

A cohort study was based on the hospital's electronic patient records and conducted in patients aged 18 years and over and admitted to a psychiatric hospital. They were followed up for 84 days or until the end of hospitalisation. Four variables of misuse were built: excessive duration of treatment, type of product, excessive dosage and concomitant benzodiazepines. Backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for each misuse criterion, on the 1 hand, and impact of benzodiazepine misuse, on the other.

RESULTS

In total, 511 psychiatric inpatients were included with 89.0% of them exposed to benzodiazepine. Discharge prescription included no benzodiazepine or a dosage lower than the maximum dosage prescribed during hospitalisation for 78.2% of patients exposed to benzodiazepine during their stay. Of benzodiazepine treatments, 31.4% were associated with at least 1 misuse criterion. Excessive dosage was associated with age ≥65 years (OR 11.57; 95% confidence interval 4.92-27.17), substance/alcohol use disorders (3.35; 95% confidence interval 1.70-6.62) and parenthood (0.49; 0.25-0.97). Some criteria of benzodiazepine misuse were associated with a higher frequency of adverse events occurring after treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Misuse of benzodiazepines is very common in inpatients with psychiatric disorders. These findings should alert clinicians to comply with clinical recommendations.

Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs as a Risk Factor in Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs are compounds widely prescribed in medical practice due to their anxiolytic, hypnotic, and muscle relaxant properties. Yet, their chronic use is associated with cases of abuse, dependence, and relapse in many patients. Furthermore, elderly people are susceptible to alterations in pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics as well as to drug interaction due to polypharmacy. These situations increase the risk for the appearance of cognitive affectations and the development of pathologies like Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present work, there is a summary of some clinical studies that have evaluated the effect of BZDs and Z-drugs in the adult population with and without AD, focusing on the relationship between their use and the loss of cognitive function. Additionally, there is an assessment of preclinical studies focused on finding molecular proof on the pathways by which these drugs could be involved in AD pathogenesis. Moreover, available data (1990-2019) on BZD and Z-drug use among elderly patients, with and without AD, was compiled in this work. Finally, the relationship between the use of BZD and Z-drugs for the treatment of insomnia and the appearance of AD biomarkers was analyzed. Results pointed to a vicious circle that would worsen the condition of patients over time. Likewise, it put into relevance the need for close monitoring of those patients using BZDs that also suffer from AD. Consequently, future studies should focus on optimizing strategies for insomnia treatment in the elderly by using other substances like melatonin agonists, which is described to have a much more significant safety profile.

The Effects of Benzodiazepine Use and Abuse on Cognition in the Elders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines (BZD) are one of the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. However, the cognitive effects of benzodiazepines in the elderly are highly debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the following two questions in the elderly population: (i) Do BZD lead to any impairments in cognitive functions in elderly users? and (ii) Which specific cognitive domains are most affected by BZD use and abuse?

METHODS

First, we performed a literature search following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until May 14^th, 2020. After selecting the relevant articles, we integrated the results of the selected studies with a standardized cognitive classification method. Next, we performed meta-analyses with the random-effects model on the cognitive results. Finally, we specifically examined the cognitive impairments of BZD in the abuse subgroup.

RESULTS

Of the included studies, eight of the thirteen had meta-analyzable data. Compared to the controls, elderly BZD users had significantly lower digital symbol test scores (n=253; SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -0.91 to 0.31, I² = 0%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in Mini-Mental State Examination, Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Stroop Color and Word Test scores between BZD users and controls. According to the subgroup analyses, BZD abusers performed significantly worse than controls in Mini-Mental State Examination (n=7726; SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.03, I² = 86%, p = 0.02), while there was no significant difference between the regular BZD users and the controls (n=1536; SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.48, I² = 92%, p =0.85).

CONCLUSION

In the elderly population, the processing speed (digital symbol test scores) was significantly impaired in BZD users; global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination scores) was significantly impaired in BZD abusers but not in BZD regular users. This study provides insight into the factors that interact with BZD cognitive effects, such as aging, testing tools, and abuse. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing BZD for the elderly.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019124711.

Drug interactions with dementia-related pathophysiological pathways worsen or prevent dementia

Many risk factors are known to induce or precipitate dementia. Drugs acting via different mechanisms can modulate cognitive performance and exert either beneficial or deleterious effects on cognition through functional or neuropathological mechanisms. This review discusses the association between several classes of drugs and cognitive impairment and dementia risk. These drugs can be divided into drugs targeting CNS disorders (e.g., anticholinergic drugs, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and opioids) and drugs targeting non‐CNS disorders (e.g., antidiabetics, antihypertensives, proton pump inhibitors, and statins). Furthermore, we sought to highlight the pharmacological mechanisms underlying their possible detrimental or beneficial effects on cognition. Anticholinergic and antiepileptic drugs were excluded from this review because their effects on cognition are well known. Studies investigating benzodiazepines have revealed an increased risk of dementia. Conclusions on dementia risk or cognitive impairment regarding opioids and antipsychotic drugs are difficult to draw. These different classes appear to impair cognition not by a single clear mechanism of action specific to each class but by several relatively interdependent and interconnected mechanisms (e.g., impaired neurotransmission, neuroinflammation, neuronal death, oxidative stress, or interactions with dementia‐related pathways). The dementia risk initially associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors might have been overestimated. In contrast, statins, antihypertensive medications, and antidiabetics could potentially decrease the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment by acting in ways opposite to the mechanisms cited above.

Linked Articles

This article is part of a themed section on Therapeutics for Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: New Directions for Precision Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.18/issuetoc

Making DEEP Sense of Lifestyle Risk and Resilience

To effectively promote life-long health and resilience against – for example – neurodegenerative diseases, evidence-based recommendations must acknowledge the complex multidimensionality not only of the diseases but also of personal lifestyle. In a straightforward descriptive and heuristic framework, more than 50 potential lifestyle factors cluster around diet (D), education (E), exercise (E), and purpose (P), unveiling their many relationships across domains and scales. The resulting systematics and its visualization might be a small but helpful step toward the development of more comprehensive, interdisciplinary models of lifestyle-dependent risk and resilience and a means to explain the opportunities and limitations of preventive measures to the public and other stakeholders. Most importantly, this perspective onto the subject implies that not all lifestyle factors are created equal but that there is a hierarchy of values and needs that influences the success of lifestyle-based interventions.

Health-Promoting Strategies for the Aging Brain

As the world's population ages and people live longer, the changes in the aging brain present substantial challenges to our health and society. With greater longevity come age-related diseases, many of which have direct and indirect influences on the health of the brain. Although there is some degree of predictable decline in brain functioning with aging, meaningful cognitive decline is not inevitable and is perhaps preventable. In this review, we present the case that the course of aging-related brain disease and dysfunction can be modified. We present the evidence for conditions and risk factors that may contribute to cognitive decline and dementia and for interventions that may mitigate their impact on cognitive functioning later in life, or even prevent them and their cognitive sequelae from developing. Although much work remains to be done to meet the challenges of the aging brain, strategies to promote its health have been demonstrated and offer much promise, which can only be realized if we mount a vigorous public health effort to implement these strategies.

Sedative-hypnotic initiation and renewal at discharge in hospitalized older patients: an observational study

Background

Sedative-hypnotics (SHs) are widely used in France but there are no available data addressing their prescription specifically in hospitalized older patients. The objective is thus to determine the cumulative incidence of sedative-hypnotic (SH) medications initialized during a hospital stay of older patients, the proportion of SH renewal at discharge among these patients and to study associated risk factors.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study in six internal medicine units and six acute geriatric units in eight hospitals (France). We included 1194 inpatients aged 65 and older without SH medications prior to hospitalization. Data were obtained from patients’ electronic pharmaceutical records. Primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of SH initiation in the study units. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of SH renewal at discharge and risk factors for SH initiation and renewal at discharge (patient characteristics, hospital organization). A Cox regression model was used to study risk factors for SH initiation. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to study risk factors for SH renewal at discharge.

Results

SH initiation occurred in 21.5% of participants 20 days after admission. SH renewal at discharge occurred in 38.7% of patients who had initiated it during their stay and were discharged home and in 56.0% of patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities. Neither patients’ characteristics nor hospital organization patterns was associated with SH initiation. SH initiation after the first six days after admission was associated with a lower risk of SH renewal in patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: [0.04–0.80]).

Conclusions

Hospitalization is a period at risk for SH initiation. The implementation of interventions promoting good use of SHs is thus of first importance in hospitals. Specific attention should be paid to patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Benzodiazepine use and the risk for dementia

Emerging evidence indicates that the use of benzodiazepines among older adults may increase the risk of development of dementia. A review of the literature identified 13 studies investigating this link. Eight studies found a positive association between the use of benzodiazepines and development of dementia. Two studies found no such association, two had mixed results and one study found that benzodiazepine use reduced the incidence of dementia. As none of these studies were controlled prospective studies, causality could not be ascertained. The association identified between the use of benzodiazepines and the development of dementia is a cause for concern among older adults.

Deprescribing Benzodiazepines in Older Patients: Impact of Interventions Targeting Physicians, Pharmacists, and Patients

Benzodiazepines (BZDs; including the related Z-drugs) are frequently targets for deprescribing; long-term use in older people is harmful and often not beneficial. BZDs can result in significant harms, including falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, car crashes and a significant financial and legal burden to society. Deprescribing BZDs is problematic due to a complex interaction of drug, patient, physician and systematic barriers, including concern about a potentially distressing but rarely fatal withdrawal syndrome. Multiple studies have trialled interventions to deprescribe BZDs in older people and are discussed in this narrative review. Reported success rates of deprescribing BZD interventions range between 27 and 80%, and this variability can be attributed to heterogeneity of methodological approaches and limited generalisability to cognitively impaired patients. Interventions targeting the patient and/or carer include raising awareness (direct-to-consumer education, minimal interventions, and 'one-off' geriatrician counselling) and resourcing the patient (gradual dose reduction [GDR] with or without cognitive behavioural therapy, teaching relaxation techniques, and sleep hygiene). These are effective if the patient is motivated to cease and is not significantly cognitively impaired. Interventions targeted to physicians include prescribing interventions by audit, algorithm or medication review, and providing supervised GDR in combination with medication substitution. Pharmacists have less frequently been the targets for studies, but have key roles in several multifaceted interventions. Interventions are evaluated according to the Behaviour Change Wheel. Research supports trialling a stepwise approach in the cognitively intact older person, but having a low threshold to use less-consultative methods in patients with dementia. Several resources are available to support deprescribing of BZDs in clinical practice, including online protocols.

Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs: An Updated Review of Major Adverse Outcomes Reported on in Epidemiologic Research

Various adverse events resulting from, or associated with, benzodiazepine and/or Z-drug use have been extensively reported on and discussed in great detail within the biomedical literature. It is widely accepted that motor vehicle accidents and falls leading to fractures in older adults are major adverse events that have been shown to occur more frequently in users of sedative-hypnotic medication, especially of the benzodiazepine and related Z-drug variety. However, the last few years have seen increasing reports in the literature raising the issue of benzodiazepine and Z-drug exposure in the development of other serious medical issues including dementia, infections, respiratory disease exacerbation, pancreatitis, and cancer. This article provides an overview and interpretation on the current state of evidence regarding each of these associations and proposes what gaps in the evidence for drug-exposure–harm associations need to be addressed in the future for the purpose of evaluating causality of harm as it relates to these drugs.

Addictive potential of novel treatments for refractory depression and anxiety

Treatment-resistant mood disorders and anxiety disorders require intensive treatment, but treatment options should balance benefits and adverse effects or other potential detrimental effects on patients, including the risk of developing prescription medication addiction. Some of the newer treatment modalities for mood and anxiety disorders may have similar properties to benzodiazepines. The goal of this review was to identify the potential for developing dependence on the novel treatment approaches to treatment-resistant depression and refractory anxiety disorders. PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Ketamine is effective in improving symptoms of major depressive disorder, but with no sustained benefits. Long-term use of oral or intranasal ketamine formulations may be associated with the risk of developing dependence. Augmentation of stimulant medication is usually effective for residual symptoms of depression, but the effects are usually short lasting and there is a potential for abuse. Synthetic cannabinoids and medicinal cannabis are increasingly being prescribed for a number of medical conditions, including anxiety disorders, without enough evidence about their efficacy and with the risk of patients developing dependence. In summary, benzodiazepines, ketamine, stimulant medications, and cannabinoids have some common characteristics, including short-lasting benefits and the risk of developing prescription medication addiction with longer use. All of these treatments may raise ethical dilemmas about the appropriateness of prescribing these medications in the long run for patients with depression and anxiety disorders.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Risk of Dementia Associated with Benzodiazepine Use, After Controlling for Protopathic Bias

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine use is highly prevalent in elderly and late middle-aged populations and may be associated with an increased risk of dementia. Observational studies have suggested that benzodiazepine use may increase the risk of dementia, however there have been significant concerns regarding protopathic bias in these studies, precluding conclusive findings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate the risk of dementia associated with the use of benzodiazepines in elderly patients, after controlling for protopathic bias.

METHODS

We identified observational studies with more than 50 cases, adequate assessment of benzodiazepine exposure, and reliable dementia diagnosis ascertainment, from the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and CENTRAL electronic databases through to 5 June 2018, with no language limits. The association of any current or former use of short- or long-acting benzodiazepines with incident dementia was analysed. A subgroup analysis was performed by the introduction of lag time to assess the effect of protopathic bias. We also performed analyses considering the effect of higher benzodiazepine cumulative doses and adjustment for psychiatric covariates. Study quality was investigated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

We identified 15 studies reported in 14 articles, involving 159,090 cases. Ever use of benzodiazepines was associated with a significantly increased risk of dementia [odds ratio (OR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.59]. Those studies that implemented the longest lag times of ≥ 5 years, and hence most likely to overcome protopathic bias, found a risk estimate that was marginally attenuated, but still significant (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.48). Long-acting benzodiazepines were associated with a marginally higher magnitude risk (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.49) than short-acting benzodiazepines (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26), although the former failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the association between benzodiazepine use and dementia incidence is not purely an artefact due to protopathic bias. Reduction of inappropriate benzodiazepine prescription is likely to attenuate dementia risk.

Trajectories in hypnotic use and approaching death: a register linked case-control study

PURPOSE

Whether the association between hypnotic and increased mortality risk is created by causation or confounding, has been long debated. We further examined the possibility of confounding by indication with a comprehensive approach.

METHODS

The National FINRISK Study cohorts of 1997, 2002, and 2007 (25,436 participants aged 25-74) were followed up until July 2012. There were 1822 deaths, and at least one gender, baseline age and cohort matched 'control' was found for 1728 'cases' yielding a final analytical sample of 3955 individuals. An index age, equivalent to the age at death of their respective cases' was set for each control. Hypnotic drug purchases were followed from the Finnish nationwide register during a 36-month run-up period before the date of death/index date. The prevalence and incidence of hypnotic purchases were compared between cases and matched controls. Moreover, latent developmental trajectories of purchases were modelled and their relations with specific and all-cause death risks were analysed.

RESULTS

An increasing difference between cases and controls was observed as regards the use of hypnotic drugs. During the last 30 months before the date of death/index date, the rate ratio of incident purchases between cases and controls was 2.37 (95% CL, 1.79-3.12) among older and 3.61 (95% CL, 2.37-5.89) among younger individuals. The developmental trajectories of hypnotic drug purchases were differently and by interpretation plausibly associated with specific mortality risks.

CONCLUSIONS

In most cases the association between hypnotics and mortality risk is created by symptomatic treatment when death is approaching.

Benzodiazepines Withdrawal: Initial Outcomes and Long-Term Impact on Falls in a French Nursing Home

Long-term use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) is known to induce tolerance and dependence, and increase the risk of falls-related injuries in older adults. We present a study carried out in a French nursing home that concerns the implementation of a BZD withdrawal program reassessed at one year. BZD deprescription was achieved by gradual cessation of doses. A secondary benefit of this program was assessed by comparing the number of falls among residents before and after withdrawal. The number of falls was recorded over a six-month period prior to the onset of withdrawal (T1) and then over a six-month period after reassessment at one year (T2). At the beginning, 31 (28.7%) of the patients were under BZD. Total deprescription was obtained for 11 patients. The number of falls per patient over the T1 period was not different between the two groups (future non-withdrawn and withdrawn patients in BZD): 2.1 ± 1.3 and 2.3 ± 0.6 falls per resident, respectively. Conversely, the number of falls per patient was significantly decreased in the population completely withdrawn in BZD between the T1 and T2 periods (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 falls, p = 0.01). The results show that BZD deprescription, through a gradual reduction of doses, is possible to achieve.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Dementia: Physiopathological Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, mainly encompassing cognitive decline in subjects aged ≥65 years. Further, AD is characterized by selective synaptic and neuronal degeneration, vascular dysfunction, and two histopathological features: extracellular amyloid plaques composed of amyloid beta peptide (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles formed by hyperphosphorylated tau protein. Dementia and AD are chronic neurodegenerative conditions with a complex physiopathology involving both genetic and environmental factors. Recent clinical studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with risk of dementia, including AD. However, a recent case-control study reported decreased risk of dementia. PPIs are a widely indicated class of drugs for gastric acid-related disorders, although most older adult users are not treated for the correct indication. Although neurological side effects secondary to PPIs are rare, several preclinical reports indicate that PPIs might increase Aβ levels, interact with tau protein, and affect the neuronal microenvironment through several mechanisms. Considering the controversy between PPI use and dementia risk, as well as both cognitive and neuroprotective effects, the aim of this review is to examine the relationship between PPI use and brain effects from a neurobiological and clinical perspective.

Regular Benzodiazepine and Z-Substance Use and Risk of Dementia: An Analysis of German Claims Data

BACKGROUND

While acute detrimental effects of benzodiazepine (BDZ), and BDZ and related z-substance (BDZR) use on cognition and memory are known, the association of BDZR use and risk of dementia in the elderly is controversially discussed. Previous studies on cohort or claims data mostly show an increased risk for dementia with the use of BDZs or BDZRs. For Germany, analyses on large population-based data sets are missing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between regular BDZR use and incident any dementia in a large German claims data set.

METHODS

Using longitudinal German public health insurance data from 2004 to 2011 we analyzed the association between regular BDZR use (versus no BDZR use) and incident dementia in a case-control design. We examined patient samples aged≥60 years that were free of dementia at baseline. To address potential protopathic bias we introduced a lag time between BDZR prescription and dementia diagnosis. Odds ratios were calculated applying conditional logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounding factors such as comorbidities and polypharmacy.

RESULTS

The regular use of BDZRs was associated with a significant increased risk of incident dementia for patients aged≥60 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.29). The association was slightly stronger for long-acting substances than for short-acting ones. A trend for increased risk for dementia with higher exposure was observed.

CONCLUSION

The restricted use of BDZRs may contribute to dementia prevention in the elderly.

A systematic review of regulatory and educational interventions to reduce the burden associated with the prescriptions of sedative-hypnotics in adults treated for sleep disorders

BACKGROUND

The burden of Sedative-Hypnotics (SHs) has been known since the 1980s. Yet, their consumption remains high. A systematic review of the literature should help to assess efficient interventions to improve the appropriate use of SHs in sleep disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess regulatory and educational interventions designed to improve the appropriate use of SHs for insomnia treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search covering the period 1980-2015 was carried out in Medline, Web of Science, Embase and PsycInfo. We included studies reporting the implementation of regulatory or educational strategies directed towards patients and/or healthcare professionals to improve the appropriate use of SHs to treat insomnia in the community, hospitals and nursing homes.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included: 23 assessed educational interventions (recommendations by mail/email, computer alerts, meetings, mass media campaigns, prescription profile), 8 assessed regulatory interventions (prescription rule restriction, end of reimbursement). The most recent was implemented in 2009. Restrictive prescription rules were effective to reduce the consumption of targeted SHs but led to a switch to other non-recommended SHs. Among educational interventions, only 3 studies out of 7 reported positive results of mono-faceted interventions; whereas, 13 out of the 16 multi-faceted interventions were reported as efficient: particularly, the active involvement of healthcare professionals and patients and the spread of information through mass media were successful. The risk of bias was high for 24 studies (mainly due to the design), moderate for 3 studies and weak for 4 studies.

CONCLUSION

Educational multifaceted studies are presented as the most efficient. But further better designed studies are needed to make evidence-based results more generalizable.

Association between high cumulative dose of benzodiazepine in Chinese patients and risk of dementia: a preliminary retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Evidence describing the association between high-dose benzodiazepine use and dementia has been conflicting. Most previous studies involved Caucasian populations, with only limited data on Chinese subjects. Possible differences exist between Chinese and Caucasian populations with regard to metabolism and prescription practice. This study aimed to assess the association between high-dose benzodiazepine use and dementia in a Chinese population.

METHOD

A retrospective case-control study was carried out in all public hospitals under the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster between 2000 and 2015. The study recruited 273 Chinese adults (91 cases, 182 controls) aged 75 and over, with at least 6 years of follow-up data. Each dementia case was matched with two controls according to sex, age group, and duration of follow-up. The number of patients with benzodiazepine ever-use and the exposure density based on the prescribed daily doses were assessed. Prescribed daily doses were categorized as either <1096 or ≥1096. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The difference in exposure density between the dementia and control groups was statistically significant between prescribed daily doses <1096 and ≥1096 (P = 0.02). There were two multivariate analyses models; one factored in depression (model 1), and the other (model 2) did not. Model 2 showed a statistically significant association (odds ratio = 1.71, 95% confidence intervals = 1.02-2.89, P = 0.04) between benzodiazepine exposure density and dementia.

CONCLUSION

High-dose benzodiazepine use may be associated with dementia in the Chinese population. Prospective studies are required.

Prevalence of and factors associated with benzodiazepine use in community-resident elderly persons

Abstract Objective: to assess the prevalence of and factors associated with the use of benzodiazepines in elderly persons living in the community. Method: a cross-sectional study was conducted through a household survey of 423 elderly persons from Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil. To analyze the factors associated with the outcome, the Poisson regression model was used, based on the theoretical model of determination with hierarchical blocks. The variables were adjusted within each block, with those with a 5% significance level remaining in the final model. Result: The prevalence of benzodiazepine use was 18.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 21.6). Most benzodiazepines used had a long-elimination half-life (59.2%) and use was considered long in 85.5% of users. Among benzodiazepine users 38.4% also used antidepressants. The use of these drugs was associated with the presence of self-reported mental and behavioral disorders, polypharmacy and medical visits in the last three months. Conclusion: The use of benzodiazepines was considered high among the elderly. The reduction in the prescription of these drugs should be assessed individually, considering the physiological alterations of the elderly and the adverse effects of drugs, in order to minimize incorrect prescriptions.

False-positive results in pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance

False-positive constitute an important issue in scientific research. In the domain of drug evaluation, it affects all phases of drug development and assessment, from the very early preclinical studies to the late post-marketing evaluations. The core concern associated with this false-positive is the lack of replicability of the results. Aside from fraud or misconducts, false-positive is often envisioned from the statistical angle, which considers them as a price to pay for type I error in statistical testing, and its inflation in the context of multiple testing. If envisioning this problematic in the context of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance however, that both evaluate drugs in an observational settings, information brought by statistical testing and the significance of such should only be considered as additional to the estimates provided and their confidence interval, in a context where differences have to be a clinically meaningful upon everything, and the results appear robust to the biases likely to have affected the studies. In the following article, we consequently illustrate these biases and their consequences in generating false-positive results, through studies and associations between drug use and health outcomes that have been widely disputed.

Substance Abuse in Older Psychiatric Inpatients

Abstract. Aim: This study investigates the characteristics of older patients with substance abuse disorders admitted to a psychiatric department serving about 250.000 inhabitants. Methods: The clinical diagnoses were made according to ICD-10. The data of the patients with substance abuse were compared to a matched sample of psychiatric inpatients without substance abuse as well as to a group of former substance abusers with long-term abstinence. Results: 19.3 % of the 941 patients aged > 65 years showed current substance abuse, 9.4 % consumed alcohol, 7.9 % took benzodiazepines or z-drugs (zolpidem and zopiclone), and 7.0 % smoked tobacco. Multiple substance abuse was rather common (30.8 %). About 85 % of the substance abusers had psychiatric comorbidity, and about 30 % showed severe withdrawal symptoms. As with the rest of the patients, somatic multimorbidity was present in about 70 % of the substance abusers. Remarkable was the lower rate of dementia in current substance abusers. Conclusion: These results underscore that substance abuse is still a challenge in the psychiatric inpatient treatment of older people.

Anxiety

Anxiety disorders (separation anxiety disorder, selective mutism, specific phobias, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and generalised anxiety disorder) are common and disabling conditions that mostly begin during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood. They differ from developmentally normative or stress-induced transient anxiety by being marked (ie, out of proportion to the actual threat present) and persistent, and by impairing daily functioning. Most anxiety disorders affect almost twice as many women as men. They often co-occur with major depression, alcohol and other substance-use disorders, and personality disorders. Differential diagnosis from physical conditions-including thyroid, cardiac, and respiratory disorders, and substance intoxication and withdrawal-is imperative. If untreated, anxiety disorders tend to recur chronically. Psychological treatments, particularly cognitive behavioural therapy, and pharmacological treatments, particularly selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-noradrenaline-reuptake inhibitors, are effective, and their combination could be more effective than is treatment with either individually. More research is needed to increase access to and to develop personalised treatments.