Drug-induced urticaria

Covid-19 Vaccination and Chronic Urticaria: A Paradigm Study

Background

Multiple vaccines were introduced during 2020-2021 to combat Covid-19 pandemic, being one of the successful vaccine programmes in the present era. Very few studies are available on status of chronic urticaria (CU) post Covid-19 vaccination.

Aim

The aim of this study was to study effect of Covid-19 vaccination on our urticaria cohort.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, case records of CU patients registered in urticaria clinic, who had received any type of Covid-19 vaccine during the interval of March 2021-2022 were retrieved. Patients were classified as 'vaccine induced urticaria' (VIU) when CU developed for first time post-vaccination and 'vaccine exacerbated urticaria' (VEU) when administration of vaccine exacerbated disease activity in previously diagnosed CU.

Results

Overall, 353 CU patients registered with us during this period, 265 had received atleast one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, of which 12 reported VEU (ten of whom had received adenovirus vector vaccine), and three patients were diagnosed with VIU (all had received inactivated virus vaccine). Mean vitamin D3 levels were significantly higher in patients who had VEU as compared to those CU patients without exacerbation (p = 0.003). Significant correlation was observed between level of concern regarding adverse effects of vaccination, pre-vaccination, and post-vaccination urticaria activity score (UAS-7), (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.66, P = 0.007) in both VEU and VIU. Urticaria symptoms were controlled in 75% and 66.6% patients, respectively, of VEU and VIU, after one month of initiating standard antihistamine treatment.

Conclusion

Hence, we conclude that though Covid-19 vaccines can trigger CU, standard treatment protocols control disease activity in most patients.

How Infection and Vaccination Are Linked to Acute and Chronic Urticaria: A Special Focus on COVID-19

Since more than a century ago, there has been awareness of the connection between viral infections and the onset and exacerbation of urticaria. Our knowledge about the role of viral infection and vaccination in acute and chronic urticaria improved as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic but it has also highlighted knowledge gaps. Viral infections, especially respiratory tract infections like COVID-19, can trigger the onset of acute urticaria (AU) and the exacerbation of chronic urticaria (CU). Less frequently, vaccination against viruses including SARS-CoV-2 can also lead to new onset urticaria as well as worsening of CU in minority. Here, with a particular focus on COVID-19, we review what is known about the role of viral infections and vaccinations as triggers and causes of acute and chronic urticaria. We also discuss possible mechanistic pathways and outline the unmet needs in our knowledge. Although the underlying mechanisms are not clearly understood, it is believed that viral signals, medications, and stress can activate skin mast cells (MCs). Further studies are needed to fully understand the relevance of viral infections and vaccinations in acute and chronic urticaria and to better clarify causal pathways.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria after BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccination against SARS-CoV-2

Background: The factors that trigger and exacerbate chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are well known, but it is not unclear whether messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can trigger new cases of CSU or a relapse of CSU after long-term remission. Objective: To study the clinical cases of patients with new-onset CSU and CSU in remission who relapsed within 3 months after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. Methods: All patients with a CSU diagnosis within 12 weeks of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination were retrospectively identified and included in the new-onset CSU and the relapsed CSU groups. The first control group (CSU control group) retrospectively consisted of patients diagnosed with CSU in complete clinical remission for ≥ 6 months, with no CSU relapse after vaccination. The second control group (healthy control group) consisted of subjects who were fully vaccinated and without CSU, matched 1:2 for age and sex with patients with CSU. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in the relapsed CSU group, 32 patients in the new-onset CSU group, 179 patients in the CSU control group, and 476 subjects in the healthy control group. The relapsed CSU and new-onset CSU groups had more allergic comorbidities overall (19 [70.4%] and 13 [40.6%], respectively) than the CSU control group and the healthy control group (50 [27.9%] and 110 [23.1%], respectively; p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a positive autologous serum skin test result, overall allergic comorbidities, and basopenia were positively associated with the probability of CSU relapse within 3 months after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 5.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.36-13.02], p < 0.001); OR 6.13 [95% CI, 2.52-14.89], p = 0.001; and OR 2.81 [95% CI, 1.17-6.72, p = 0.020, respectively). Conclusion: It is possible that BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination serves as a provoking and/or relapsing factor of CSU in individuals with allergic diseases and/or predisposed autoimmunity.

Triggers of Exacerbation in Chronic Urticaria and Recurrent Angioedema-Prevalence and Relevance

Patients with urticaria and angioedema often have triggers that cause an outbreak or a swelling episode or worsen their chronic condition. Exploring these factors with each patient may result in better understanding and control of their disease. Patients should be advised to avoid known triggers, if feasible, or prepare to prevent or control an exacerbation with appropriate pretreatment if avoidance is not possible. In this review, we describe and discuss a variety of factors for which there is evidence that they cause or exacerbate chronic spontaneous urticaria and angioedema. These potentially exacerbating factors include drugs, food additives, and naturally occurring pseudoallergens, mental stress, and trauma.

Application of RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of cetirizine in the presence of quinolones

Background

Present work describes a fast, simple, and sensitive procedure for the simultaneous determination of cetirizine in the presence of quinolones using diclofenac sodium as an internal standard. The present work was designed to analyze these compounds in pharmaceutical and clinical labs being economical for use.

Results

The mobile phase consisted of the simple composition of methanol, acetonitrile, and water in a ratio of 50:20:30 with a pH adjusted to 3.1 at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The UV detection was performed at 225 nm. The linearity was assessed over the range of 2.5–50 μg mL−1 for all drugs. The parameters such as accuracy, precision, linearity (>0.999), and sensitivity were satisfactory.

Conclusion

The method was equally applicable for formulation and human serum with recovery values between 95 and 105%. The results of the method were validated statistically according to ICH guidelines.

Spontaneous cutaneous adverse drug reaction reports-An analysis of a 10-year dataset in Singapore

We analyzed the spontaneous adverse event database in Singapore to determine the types of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) and causative drugs reported. We selected 10 CADRs-of-interest, and identified the suspected drugs and the characteristics of the at-risk population. ADR reports received from 2006 to 2015 of the system organ class "Skin and Appendages Disorders" were analyzed based on patient demographics, the types of CADRs, suspected drugs, outcome, and latency period. Of the 104 372 reports analyzed, 56.2% involved females and 72.5% involved Chinese patients. The mean age was 41.1 years old. The top CADRs reported were rash (including nonspecified rash, follicular rash, maculopapular rash, and vesicular rash) (67.2%) and angioedema (13.9%). The drugs frequently associated with the CADRs-of-interest include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and antibiotics with angioedema, iohexol with urticaria, and antiepileptics and allopurinol with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). A subgroup analysis based on age, sex, and race on the 10 CADRs-of-interest showed the following trends in reporting: Alopecia (reported more in females), drug hypersensitivity syndrome (more in males), angioedema (more in younger patients), and photosensitivity (more in older patients). In general, the racial distribution across each CADR-of-interest was consistent with that of Singapore's population, with slight deviations observed for SJS/TEN, photosensitivity and skin discoloration. We analyzed CADR reports from Singapore over 10 years, and identified the types of CADRs reported, and their associated drugs, latency periods and patient characteristics. Such information could add value to healthcare professionals as they assess CADR cases and evaluate suspected drugs.

Adverse Drug Reactions in the Intensive Care Unit

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are undesirable effects of medications used in normal doses [1]. ADRs can occur during treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU) or result in ICU admissions. A meta-analysis of 4139 studies suggests the incidence of ADRs among hospitalized patients is 17% [2]. Because of underreporting and misdiagnosis, the incidence of ADRs may be much higher and has been reported to be as high as 36% [3]. Critically ill patients are at especially high risk because of medical complexity, numerous high-alert medications, complex and often challenging drug dosing and medication regimens, and opportunity for error related to the distractions of the ICU environment [4]. Table 1 summarizes the ADRs included in this chapter.

Clinical similarities among bradykinin-mediated and mast cell-mediated subtypes of non-hereditary angioedema: a retrospective study

Background

Non-hereditary angioedema (non-HAE) is characterized by local swelling due to self-limiting, subcutaneous or submucosal extravasation of fluid, and can be divided into three subtypes. These subtypes are believed to have different pathophysiological backgrounds and are referred to in recent guidelines as bradykinin-mediated (e.g. caused by angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors), mast cell-mediated (e.g. angioedema with wheals) or idiopathic (cause unknown). Bradykinin-mediated subtypes are more closely related to hereditary angioedema than the other forms. Because clinical features of these non-HAE subtypes have not been studied in detail, we have looked at the clinical characteristics of symptoms and potential differences in clinical presentation of bradykinin-mediated and mast cell-mediated angioedema (AE) subtypes.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent to patients presenting with AE at our tertiary outpatient clinic to document clinical characteristics, potential triggers and location of AE. The severity of AE attacks was analysed using visual analogue scales (VAS).

Results

The questionnaire was returned by 106 patients, of which 104 were included in the analysis. AE with wheals, idiopathic AE, and drug-associated AE occurred in 64 (62%), 25 (24%) and 15 patients (14%) respectively. Most patients (62%) reported prodromal symptoms while 63% reported multiple locations for an attack. Face and oropharynx were the main locations of AE attacks of any subtype while swelling was the symptom most frequently reported as severe. Overall severity of the last attack was indicated as severe by 68% of the patients. There were no differences between the subgroups.

Conclusion

This similarity in clinical presentation raises the possibility that ACEi-induced, mast cell-mediated and idiopathic AE share common pathways.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13601-015-0049-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recent advances in drug-induced angioedema

Angioedema is the end result of deep dermal, subcutaneous and/or mucosal swelling, and is potentially a life-threatening condition in cases where the pharynx or larynx is involved. Drug-induced angioedema has been reported to occur in response to a wide range of drugs and vaccines. Drug-induced angioedema, like other cutaneous drug reactions, has been reported to be most frequently elicited by beta-lactam antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, although reliable data from epidemiologic studies are scarce. Recent reports suggested an increasing role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in the causation of life-threatening angioedema. ACEI-related angioedema is never accompanied by urticaria and occurs via a kinin-dependent mechanism. ACEI-related angioedema not only can start years after beginning the treatment, but it can then recur irregularly while under that treatment. Furthermore, allergy tests are unreliable for the diagnosis of ACEI-related angioedema, and so the relationship between angioedema and ACEIs is often missed and consequently quite underestimated. Accordingly, better understanding of the kinin-dependent mechanism, which is particular to angioedema, is necessary for the appropriate management of drug-induced angioedema.

[Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in childhood and adolescence]

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) occur in nearly 10% of hospitalized children and in about 1.5% of ambulatory pediatric patients. The skin is the most frequently affected target organ in drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions, which account for 20% of all ADR. Due to its pathophysiological heterogeneity and the ensuing morphological diversity, DH often represents a clinical and therapeutic challenge. Urticarial and maculopapular eruptions are usually restricted to the skin and rarely require systemic treatment or hospital admission once the culprit drug has been withdrawn. However, extracutaneous affections should be ruled out promptly in individuals with polymorphous rashes accompanied by fever and lymphadenopathy as well as in patients with bullous skin lesions. Children affected by severe drug reactions usually require in-hospital surveillance and interdisciplinary supportive therapy.

Role of epidermal dendritic cells in drug-induced cutaneous adverse reactions

Drug-induced adverse reactions (ADR) include any undesirable pharmacological effect that occurs following drug administration at therapeutic doses. The appearance of ADR significantly limits the use of drugs in as much as their clinical symptoms may range from very mild discomfort such as cutaneous rash, up to very severe, or even fatal tissue necrolysis such as the Stevens Johnson syndrome.One of the most frequently involved organ during ADR is the skin. Drug-induced cutaneous reactions (CDR) incidence is variable but they may appear in 2-3% of ambulatory patients, and it may increase to 10-15% when patients are hospitalized, or even be as high as 60% when co morbidity includes the presence of virus, bacteria, or parasites.Due to the fact that skin is one of the organs most frequently involved in ADR, in this work we analyze and propose a mechanism by which epidermal dendritic cells operating as the sentinels of the skin neuro-immune-endocrine system may contribute to CDR via either immunogenic or tolerogenic immune responses towards drugs, whenever they are administered topic or systemically.

Safety of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and a basic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in Japanese patients with NSAID-induced urticaria and/or angioedema: Comparison of meloxicam, etodolac and tiaramide

The identification of a safe and reliable alternative for patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced urticaria/angioedema is a frequent problem for dermatologists and other practitioners. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been reported to be safe for NSAID-intolerant patients from the US and Europe but not all of them have yet been approved for use in Japan. It was our objective to investigate the clinical manifestations of oral NSAID challenges in Japanese patients with histories of urticaria and/or angioedema after the intake of NSAIDs and to find safe alternative drugs, including COX-2 inhibitors and a basic anti-inflammatory drug. Twenty subjects suspected NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema from histories were included in a double-blind or single-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenge protocol using NSAIDs. Skin prick tests using NSAIDs, which were dissolved in saline, were conducted. The mean age of the patients was 37.3 years; 14 patients were female. The results of other challenge tests showed that the most frequently intolerated drugs was loxoprofen (100%), followed by acetyl salicylic (94.4%), etodolac (53.3%), dicrofenac (50%), acetaminophen (38.5%), meloxicam (33%), and tiaramide (21.4%). Urticaria and angioedema were induced after aspirin intake in 83.3% and 22.2% of patients, respectively, whereas an asthmatic response was seen in 5.6%. Skin prick tests with NSAIDs were 100% negative. This study showed that among the NSAIDs that are available in Japan and that were investigated in this study, tiaramide, which does not inhibit COX, is the relatively safe alternative drug for Japanese patients with NSAID-induced urtiacaria and/or angioedema. Furthermore, meloxicam seems to be better tolerated than etodolac between two selective COX-2 inhibitors.