The safety of levetiracetam

Prognostic factors for employment outcomes in patients with a history of childhood-onset drug-resistant epilepsy

Objective

The employment outcomes of childhood-onset drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has not been studied enough. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to investigate the employment outcomes of childhood-onset DRE in June 2022 and identify the risk factors associated with non-employment.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 65 participants ≥18 years of age with a history of childhood-onset DRE. Fifty participants (77%) were salaried employees and 15 participants (23%) were non-employed. Clinical and psychosocial information were evaluated for calculating the relative risk (RR) of non-employment.

Results

Regarding medical factors, lower IQ [RR, 0.645; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.443-0.938; p = 0.022] was positively associated with employment. In contrast, age at follow-up (RR, 1.046; 95% CI, 1.009-1.085; p = 0.014); number of ASMs at follow-up (RR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.081-2.129; p = 0.016); use of medications such as phenobarbital (RR, 3.111; 95% CI, 1.383-6.997; p = 0.006), levetiracetam (RR, 2.471; 95% CI, 1.056-5.782; p = 0.037), and topiramate (RR, 3.576; 95% CI, 1.644-7.780; p = 0.001) were negatively associated with employment. Regarding psychosocial factor, initial workplace at employment support facilities (RR, 0.241; 95% CI, 0.113-0.513; p < 0.001) was positively associated with employment. In contrast, complication of psychiatric disorder symptoms (RR, 6.833; 95% CI, 2.141-21.810; p = 0.001) was negatively associated with employment. Regarding educational factor, graduating schools of special needs education (RR, 0.148; 95% CI, 0.061-0.360; p < 0.001) was positively associated with employment.

Conclusions

Specific medical, psychosocial, and educational factors may influence the employment outcomes of childhood-onset DRE. Paying attention to ASMs' side effects, adequately preventing the complications of psychiatric disorder symptoms, and providing an environment suitable for each patient condition would promote a fine working status for people with childhood-onset DRE.

The efficacy of temozolomide combined with levetiracetam for glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery: a study protocol for a double-blinded and randomized controlled trial

Background

Temozolomide is applied as the standard chemotherapy agent in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery. However, the benefit of this treatment for patients is limited by the invasive growth of gliomas and drug resistance. There are indications from fundamental experimental and retrospective studies that levetiracetam has the potential to improve the survival rate of patients with GBM. However, it has yet to be determined whether the combination of temozolomide and levetiracetam is more effective than standard temozolomide chemotherapy. Therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial to investigate the therapeutic effect of the new combined regime for treating GBM.

Methods/design

This is a double-blind and randomized clinical trial conducted in a single center. One hundred forty-two patients will be recruited and screened for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, eligible participants will be randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group in a 1:1 ratio. Based on the administration of radiation therapy (RT), participants in the experimental group will be prescribed levetiracetam plus temozolomide chemotherapy for 34 weeks while participants in the control group will receive placebo tablets plus temozolomide for the same duration. A 3-year follow-up will be conducted on all patients after intervention. Accordingly, the primary outcome will be progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), the objective response rate (ORR), and adverse event incidence.

Discussion

It is expected that the results of this trial will provide high-level evidence regarding the clinical benefits of levetiracetam and temozolomide combined in the treatment of GBM.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100049941. Registered on 14 August 2021

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06168-1.

The Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Critically Ill Adult Patients: An Intensive Care Unit Clinical Study

The aim of this study was to investigate levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in critically ill adult intensive care patients and to identify pathophysiological factors affecting its kinetics. Fourteen critically ill patients in an intensive care unit were enrolled in the study and received intravenous levetiracetam. Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the levetiracetam pharmacokinetics. Patient characteristics such as renal function, demographics, disease severity, organ dysfunction, and biochemical laboratory tests were evaluated for their influence on the kinetics of levetiracetam. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) had a statistically significant (p = 0.001) effect on levetiracetam clearance. None of the other patient characteristics had a statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics. Simulations of dosing regimens revealed that even typically administered doses of levetiracetam may result in significantly increased concentrations and risk of drug toxicity in patients with impaired renal function. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score differed significantly among the three groups with different epileptic activity (p = 0.034). The same groups also differed in terms of renal function (p = 0.031). Renal dysfunction should be considered when designing levetiracetam dosage. Patients with a low APACHE II score had the lowest risk of experiencing epileptic seizures.

Multifocal myoclonus as a presentation of levetiracetam toxicity

•

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely used antiseizure medication, but LEV toxicity is not commonly reported.

•

We report a patient with chronic kidney disease who developed multifocal myoclonus after treatment with LEV.

•

The findings suggest the possibility of an inverted U-shaped dose–response of the anti-myoclonic effect of LEV.

Background

Levetiracetam (LEV) is widely used for treatment of focal and myoclonic seizures, but reports of LEV toxicity are scarce. Here, we report a rare case of multifocal myoclonus due to LEV toxicity in a patient with chronic renal insufficiency.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old woman with history of chronic kidney disease was admitted to the ICU for sedation and intubation after a cardiac arrest. She developed nonconvulsive status epilepticus that resolved after administration of propofol while receiving LEV 1500 mg twice a day. After holding the propofol infusion, the patient started having multifocal myoclonic jerks, documented on video-EEG recordings with a supratherapeutic level of LEV. After discontinuation of LEV, the myoclonus resolved.

Conclusion

This is a unique manifestation of LEV toxicity, which has been scarce in the literature. It suggests an inverted U-shaped dose–response of the antimyoclonic effect of LEV.

Neuroprotective Efficacy of Prophylactic Antiepileptic Therapies in Busulfan Conditioning Regimen

Busulfan (BU) is commonly used in the anticancer treatment and bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (BM/HSCT) conditioning regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the neuroprotective efficacy of antiepileptic therapies in the BU conditioning regimen. Patients who underwent BM/HSCT between January 1, 2009, and January 1, 2014, were evaluated retrospectively. Diagnosis, demographic characteristics, neurological side effects, electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities, and antiepileptic drugs were determined. Levetiracetam was given to 49% and phenytoin to 23% of patients as antiepileptic prophylaxis. After BU treatment, seizures developed in three patients, posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy in two patients, and peripheral neuropathy in two patients. Forty-five patients who underwent EEG before and after BU treatment were identified. The effects of antiepileptic prophylaxis over the electroencephalographic abnormalities after the BU conditioning regimen were found to be not different (p = 0.491). Neurological side effects and electroencephalographic abnormalities following BU conditioning regimen under antiepileptic prophylaxis are comparable.

Patient Preference for Antiepileptic Drugs Treatment in China: Evidence From the Discrete Choice Experiment

Objective: Explore Chinese patients' risk-benefit preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) treatment through the discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Method: Six attributes including the efficacy of AEDs, adverse reactions (digestive system, neuropsychic systems, and the effects on the fetus), dosing frequency and drug costs (to estimate patient WTP) were included in the DCE questionnaire based on results collected from literature reviews, expert consultation, and patient survey. The alternative-specific conditional logit model was used to analyze patient preference and WTP for each attribute and its level and to assess the sociodemographic impact and clinical characteristics.

Results: A total of 151 valid questionnaires were collected. The result shows that five out of the six attributes are significant, except the dosing frequency. Among the six attributes, the efficacy of AEDs (10.0; 95% CI 8.9–11.1) is mostly concerned by patients, followed by the effects of AEDs on the fetus (8.9; 95% CI 7.7–10.1), duration of side effects in the neuropsychic system (4.9; 95% CI 3.7–6.0) and adverse reactions of the digestive system (3.2; 95% CI 1.5–4.2). The patients surveyed are willing to spend ¥ 1,246 (95% CI, ¥ 632- ¥ 1,861) per month to ensure 100% seizure control, and ¥ 1,112 (95% CI, ¥ 586–¥ 1,658) to reduce the risk of the drug affecting the fetus to 3%. Besides, it was found that personal characteristics including the intention for conception and AEDs treatment regimens have statistical significance.

Conclusion: Improving the drug's efficacy and reducing its side effects are predominant considerations for patients with epilepsy in China, especially for those who are concerned about the seizure control and the drug effect on the fetus. This finding is useful to physicians and can encourage shared decision-making between the patients and their doctors in the clinic.

Drug Repurposing in Neurological Disorders: Implications for Neurotherapy in Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant leading cause of death and disability among adults and children globally. To date, there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs that can substantially attenuate the sequelae of TBI. The innumerable challenges faced by the conventional de novo discovery of new pharmacological agents led to the emergence of alternative paradigm, which is drug repurposing. Repurposing of existing drugs with well-characterized mechanisms of action and human safety profiles is believed to be a promising strategy for novel drug use. Compared to the conventional discovery pathways, drug repurposing is less costly, relatively rapid, and poses minimal risk of the adverse outcomes to study on participants. In recent years, drug repurposing has covered a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases and neurological disorders including brain injury. This review highlights the advances in drug repurposing and presents some of the promising candidate drugs for potential TBI treatment along with their possible mechanisms of neuroprotection. Edaravone, glyburide, ceftriaxone, levetiracetam, and progesterone have been selected due to their potential role as putative TBI neurotherapeutic agents. These drugs are Food and Drug Administration-approved for purposes other than brain injuries; however, preclinical and clinical studies have shown their efficacy in ameliorating the various detrimental outcomes of TBI.

Behavioral Changes Under Levetiracetam Treatment in Dogs

In veterinary medicine levetiracetam (LEV) is a well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) with only mild to moderate side effects. Behavioral changes are rarely reported in animals. In contrast, in human medicine the impact of LEV on behavior has frequently been described. Since in the Clinic for Small Animals at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover single canine patients were observed with behavioral abnormalities after LEV treatment, it was hypothesized that levetiracetam induces behavioral changes or causes an intensifying of pre-existing behavioral abnormalities in dogs with epileptic seizures. This monocentric retrospective study evaluated the incidence of behavioral changes in epileptic dogs treated with the antiepileptic drug LEV based on information obtained in a questionnaire completed by dog owners. Eighty-four client-owned dogs with recurrent seizures receiving LEV as monotherapy, add on treatment or pulse therapy met inclusion criteria. Approximately half of the dogs in the study population were reported to have preexisting behavioral changes before treatment with LEV, and some of these dogs were reported to experience a worsening of behavioral changes (14/44) or the emergence of new behaviors after initiation of LEV therapy (4/44). One quarter of the dogs without pre-existing behavioral abnormalities developed behavioral changes associated with the administration of LEV (10/40). Based on these results, the authors conclude that behavioral changes can occur in dogs being administered LEV, and this should be taken into consideration when discussing treatment options with owners.

Risk factors predisposing to psychotic symptoms during levetiracetam therapy: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

While levetiracetam (LEV) usage is a known risk factor for psychosis in epilepsy, the modulating effect of certain patient and treatment characteristics on the risk of psychosis has yet to be fully elucidated.

METHODS

In our tertiary epilepsy center, 84 patients with psychotic symptoms during LEV usage and 100 controls without psychotic symptoms during LEV usage were selected. Patient records were reviewed including demographics, medical history, antiepileptic drug use, and cognitive abilities. Univariate comparisons were performed, and variables with p < 0.1 were selected for binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The total incidence of psychosis during LEV therapy in our population was 3.7%. The timing of psychotic symptoms was classified as postictal in 20 (19.8%), interictal in 14 (15.4%), postepilepsy surgery in 1 (1.1%), and unknown in 18 cases (19.8%). In 31 cases (34.1%), psychotic symptoms were classified as an antiepileptic drug-induced psychotic disorder (AIPD) as a result of LEV. In 7 cases (7.7%), AIPD occurred as a result of a different antiepileptic drug. A significant association was found between the experience of psychotic symptoms and status epilepticus (p = 0.002), a history of psychotic symptoms (p < 0.000), a history of psychiatric illness other than psychosis (p = 0.010), and concomitant phenytoin (PHT) usage (p = 0.044). Cotherapy with lamotrigine (LTG) was protective (p = 0.042). A separate analysis of controls and exclusively the 31 cases with LEV-induced AIPD yielded comparable results; a significant association was confirmed with status epilepticus (p = 0.021) and history of psychotic symptoms (p = 0.018), as well as with female gender (p = 0.047) and intellectual disability (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study found that psychotic symptoms during LEV therapy were significantly associated with status epilepticus, a history of psychotic symptoms, a history of psychiatric illness other than psychosis, and concomitant PHT usage, whereas concomitant LTG usage was protective. Psychotic symptoms specifically as an adverse drug reaction to LEV were significantly associated with female gender, intellectual disability, status epilepticus, and a history of psychotic symptoms.

B cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia associated with levetiracetam

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second-generation antiepileptic drug approved for the treatment of several types of epilepsy. We report a 45-year-old female who developed hypogammaglobulinemia and B cell aplasia during LEV treatment. The Naranjo probability score for an adverse drug reaction was 6. After LEV discontinuation, the number of B cells gradually increased and reached normal levels within two months. This case suggests that monitoring of immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte subsets analysis is important in patients treated with LEV, especially in cases of prolonged infections.

SIMILAR CASES PUBLISHED

1.

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are common, undesirable effects associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) use. The objective of the study was to compare the PBSE profiles of older and newer AEDs in a large specialty practice-based sample of patients diagnosed with epilepsy.

METHODS

As part of the Columbia and Yale AED Database Project, we reviewed patient records including demographics, medical history, AED use, and side effects for 4085 adult patients (age: 18 years) newly started on an AED regimen. Psychiatric and behavioral side effects were determined by patient or physician report in the medical record, which included depressive mood, psychosis, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, irritability, aggression, and tantrum. Significant non-AED predictors of PBSE rate were first determined from 83 variables using logistic regression. Predictors were then controlled for in the comparison analysis of the rate of PBSEs and intolerable PBSEs (PBSEs that led to dosage reduction or discontinuation) between 18 AEDs.

RESULTS

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occurred in 17.2% of patients and led to intolerability in 13.8% of patients. History of psychiatric condition(s), secondary generalized seizures, absence seizures, and intractable epilepsy were associated with increased incidence of PBSE. Levetiracetam (LEV) had the greatest PBSE rate (22.1%). This was statistically significant when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs (P<0.001, OR=6.87). Levetiracetam was also significantly (P<0.001) associated with higher intolerability rate (17.7%), dose decreased rate (9.4%), and complete cessation rate (8.3%), when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs. Zonisamide (ZNS) was also significantly associated with a higher rate of PBSE (9.7%) and IPBSE (7.9%, all P<0.001). On the other hand, carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA) were significantly associated with a decreased PBSE rates (P<0.001). Carbamazepine, GBP, LTG, PHT, and VPA were also associated with lower IPBSE rates when compared individually with the aggregate of other AEDs. All other AEDs were found to have intermediate rates that were not either increased or decreased compared with other AEDs. When each AED was compared to LTG, only CBZ had a significantly lower PBSE rate. The main limitations of this study were that the study design was retrospective and not blinded, and the AEDs were not randomly assigned to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occur more frequently in patients taking LEV and ZNS than any other AED and led to higher rates of intolerability. Lower PBSE rates were seen in patients taking CBZ, CLB, GBP, LTG, OXC, PHT, and VPA. Our findings may help facilitate the AED selection process.

The influence of levetiracetam on psychosocial and behavioral functioning in children: A case-control and follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam, a widely used antiepileptic drug in children, has been associated with psychosocial and behavioral problems, which are also influenced by epilepsy variables, including duration or seizure frequency.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to investigate the frequency and timing of treatment-emergent psychosocial and behavioral problems in children receiving levetiracetam, irrespective of seizure variables which are possible confounders.

METHODS

A prospective, case-control study with a 3-month follow-up was conducted. Consecutive children aged 6 to 16years with new-onset partial seizures were included in case of starting treatment with either levetiracetam or valproic acid. Psychosocial and behavioral functioning were assessed using a set of standardized questionnaires including Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) at baseline, 1 and 3-month follow-up. Patients' baseline scores were compared to healthy subjects. The difference in the follow-up SDQ and CDI scores was evaluated in patients receiving levetiracetam and valproic acid.

RESULTS

A total of 101 participants were analyzed; 32 patients in levetiracetam group, 19 patients in valproic acid group and 50 healthy controls. Baseline SDQ and CDI scores were not statistically different between patients and healthy subjects (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in CDI, total and subscale SDQ scores between patients receiving levetiracetam or valproic acid during the study period (p>0.05). A girl aged 15years receiving levetiracetam had a CDI score of 18 without suicidal ideation at baseline. She developed suicidal ideation and depression, which resolved after switching of levetiracetam to valproic acid, at the 1-month follow-up. No other psychiatric or behavioral side-effects were observed in other patients.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial and behavioral side-effects of levetiracetam treatment are not frequent and they don't emerge in most of children at lower doses. At this dose, and after 3months, using these specific instruments, we did not observe any difference between the valproic acid and levetiracetam treatment groups.

Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Ligands in the Treatment of Epilepsy and Beyond

The synaptic vesicle glycoprotein SV2A belongs to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of transporters and is an integral constituent of synaptic vesicle membranes. SV2A has been demonstrated to be involved in vesicle trafficking and exocytosis, processes crucial for neurotransmission. The anti-seizure drug levetiracetam was the first ligand to target SV2A and displays a broad spectrum of anti-seizure activity in various preclinical models. Several lines of preclinical and clinical evidence, including genetics and protein expression changes, support an important role of SV2A in epilepsy pathophysiology. While the functional consequences of SV2A ligand binding are not fully elucidated, studies suggest that subsequent SV2A conformational changes may contribute to seizure protection. Conversely, the recently discovered negative SV2A modulators, such as UCB0255, counteract the anti-seizure effect of levetiracetam and display procognitive properties in preclinical models. More broadly, dysfunction of SV2A may also be involved in Alzheimer's disease and other types of cognitive impairment, suggesting potential novel therapies for levetiracetam and its congeners. Furthermore, emerging data indicate that there may be important roles for two other SV2 isoforms (SV2B and SV2C) in the pathogenesis of epilepsy, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases. Utilization of recently developed SV2A positron emission tomography ligands will strengthen and reinforce the pharmacological evidence that SV2A is a druggable target, and will provide a better understanding of its role in epilepsy and other neurological diseases, aiding in further defining the full therapeutic potential of SV2A modulation.

Does pyridoxine control behavioral symptoms in adult patients treated with levetiracetam? Case series from UAE

Behavioral symptoms are known side effects of levetiracetam. Previous case series in children and adolescents have demonstrated the potential effect of pyridoxine in ameliorating these symptoms. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 51 patients treated with pyridoxine to control agitation and irritability following the introduction of levetiracetam. These symptoms were relieved in 34 patients (66.6%). Seventeen patients did not appear to benefit from this supplementation. This preliminary study suggests that pyridoxine might be an effective option across all ages for patients suffering from levetiracetam-induced behavioral side effects.

Levetiracetam-induced pancytopenia

Pancytopenia is a rare side effect of levetiracetam (LEV) that is associated with severe morbidity that requires hospitalization. Here, we report a patient with a right temporoparietal tumor who underwent a temporal craniotomy with resection of the mass and was started on LEV for seizure prophylaxis per the neurosurgery local protocol. The patient developed LEV-induced pancytopenia, which was successfully managed by discontinuation of this medication. Our report aims to increase awareness of this rare cause of pancytopenia among clinicians.

Tardive dyskinesia (syndrome): Current concept and modern approaches to its management

Tardive dyskinesia is a serious, disabling and potentially permanent, neurological hyperkinetic movement disorder that occurs after months or years of taking psychotropic drugs. The pathophysiology of tardive dyskinesia is complex, multifactorial and still not fully understood. A number of drugs were tried for the management of this motor disturbance, yet until now no effective and standard treatment has been found. It is very disappointing to realize that the introduction of antipsychotics from the second generation has not significantly decreased the prevalence and incidence of tardive dyskinesia. Therefore, the management of this motor disturbance remains an actual topic as well as a challenge for clinicians. This review summarizes recent relevant publications concerning the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

Levetiracetam results in increased and decreased alcohol drinking with different access procedures in C57BL/6J mice

The antiepileptic levetiracetam (LEV) has been investigated for the treatment of alcohol abuse. However, little is known about how LEV alters the behavioral effects of alcohol in laboratory animals. The acute effects of LEV on alcohol drinking by male C57BL/6J mice were investigated using two different drinking procedures, limited access [drinking-in-the-dark (DID)] and intermittent access (IA) drinking. In the first experiment (DID), mice had access to a single bottle containing alcohol or sucrose for 4 h every other day. In the second experiment (IA), mice had IA to two bottles, one containing alcohol or sucrose and one containing water, for 24 h on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. In both experiments, mice were administered LEV (0.3-100 mg/kg intraperitoneally) or vehicle 30 min before access to the drinking solutions. In the DID mice, LEV increased alcohol intake from 4.3 to 5.4 g/kg, whereas in the IA mice LEV decreased alcohol intake from 4.8 to 3.0 g/kg in the first 4 h of access and decreased 24 h alcohol intake from 20 to ∼15 g/kg. These effects appear specific to alcohol, as LEV did not affect sucrose intake in either experiment. LEV appears to differentially affect drinking in animal models of moderate and heavier alcohol consumption.

Efficacy of levetiracetam in electrical status epilepticus during sleep of children: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Electrical status epilepticus during sleep is characterized by epilepsy, a specific electroencephalographic pattern, and neuropsychological impairment. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in treating children with electrical status epilepticus during sleep.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, open-label study enrolled 73 children (mean age: 8 years) affected by electrical status epilepticus during sleep. The efficacy was rated according to the seizure frequency and electroencephalography response.

RESULTS

After a mean treatment period of 19 months (range: 6 to 24 months), 33 (63.5%) of 52 patients became seizure-free or had experienced remarkable reduction in seizures. The electrical status epilepticus of 41 (56.2%) of 73 patients disappeared off their electroencephalography. The electroencephalography efficacy of levetiracetam treatment was noted in the monotherapy (61.9%) and add-on (53.9%) groups. The clinical (67.7%) and electroencephalography (64.3%) response rates of the idiopathic group were better than those of the symptomatic group (57.1% and 45.2%, respectively). No patient discontinued the trial because of intolerability of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam is effective in individuals with electrical status epilepticus during sleep with tolerable side effects.

The adverse effects profile of levetiracetam in epilepsy: a more detailed look

The adverse effects profile of levetiracetam in epilepsy is still being fully described. We recently published a Cochrane Review evaluating the effectiveness of levetiracetam, added on to usual care, in treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The five most common adverse effects were reported and analysed with no scope for reporting any less common adverse effects than those. Here, we report and analyse the remaining adverse effects (including the five most common). These were (in decreasing order of frequency) somnolence; headache; asthenia; accidental injury; dizziness; infection; pharyngitis; pain; rhinitis; abdominal pain; flu syndrome; vomiting; diarrhoea; convulsion; nausea; increased cough; anorexia; upper respiratory tract infection; hostility; personality disorder; urinary tract infection; nervousness; depression; aggression; back pain; agitation; emotional liability; psychomotor hyperactivity; pyrexia; rash; ECG abnormalities; decreased appetite; nasal congestion; irritability; abnormal behaviour; epistaxis; insomnia; altered mood; anxiety; bloody urine; diplopia; dissociation; memory impairment; pruritis; increased appetite; acne; and stomach discomfort. Only somnolence and infection were significantly associated with levetiracetam. When adverse effects pertaining to infection were combined, these affected 19.7% and 15.1% of participants on levetiracetam and placebo (relative risk 1.16, CI 0.89-1.50, Chi(2) heterogeneity p = 0.13). Somnolence and infection further retained significance in adults while no single adverse effect was significant in children. This review updates the adverse effects profile data on levetiracetam use by empirically reporting its common and uncommon adverse effects and analysing their relative importance statistically using data from a group of trials that possess low Risk of Bias and high Quality of Evidence GRADE scores.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

Childhood epilepsy continues to be intractable in more than 25% of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The introduction of new anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) provides more options for treatment of children with epilepsy. We review the safety and tolerability of seven new AEDs (levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide) focusing on their side effect profiles and safety in children and adolescents. Many considerations that are specific for children such as the impact of AEDs on the developing brain are not addressed during the development of new AEDs. They are usually approved as adjunctive therapies based upon clinical trials involving adult patients with partial epilepsy. However, 2 of the AEDs reviewed here (rufinamide and vigabatrin) have FDA approval in the U.S. for specific Pediatric epilepsy syndromes, which are discussed below. The Pediatrician or Neurologists decision on the use of a new AED is an evolutionary process largely dependent on the patient characteristics, personal/peer experiences and literature about efficacy and safety profiles of these medications. Evidence based guidelines are limited due to a lack of randomized controlled trials involving pediatric patients for many of these new AEDs.

Motor symptoms of schizophrenia: is tardive dyskinesia a symptom or side effect? A modern treatment

Abnormal involuntary dyskinetic movements in schizophrenia patients have been documented for more than 140 years. Clinicians should distinguish between two kinds of disturbances-spontaneous dyskinetic movements and movements induced by psychotropic medications-which may look familiar clinically. As a modern term, tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially permanent neurological hyperkinetic movement disorder that occurs after months or years of taking psychotropic drugs. Several distinct forms of TD exist, specifically tardive akathisia, tardive blepharospasm, tardive dystonia, tardive gait, tardive myoclonus, tardive tremor, and tardive tics, and they have different pathophysiologies and treatment. The pathogenesis of TD remains unclear, and the pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial. Moreover, there is solid evidence of a genetic predisposition to TD. This article summarizes recent relevant publications concerning TD and the most recent studies regarding treatment of this disorder with antioxidative agents.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in pediatric epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Levetiracetam (LEV) as an adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with different generalized epilepsies.

DESIGN

Chart review of 22 consecutive children age 4-19 years who were treated with LEV for at least 1 year was observed retrospectively. The mean dose rang of LEV was from 250 to 2000 mg. Data were collected on epilepsy type, seizure frequency, concomitant antiepileptic drug and adverse effect.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patient reviewed, 13 (59%) were boys and 9 (41%) were girls. Predominant seizure types were generalized tonic-clonic seizures 13 (59%) and tonic seizure 6 (27%). Other seizure types included myoclonic seizures 2 (9%) and focal seizure 3 (5%). The results showed 10 (45%) had become free of seizure for almost 7 months to 1 year. Eight of these 10 patients (80%) had normalized EEG. Seizure frequency was reduced in 9 (41%) patients and 3 (14%) patients still had seizure. No side effects were reported related to LEV treated patients except for 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that LEV may be an effective adjunctive therapy in treatment of childhood epilepsy, especially tonic-clonic seizure, with possible no evident side effect.

Safety of non-therapeutic levetiracetam ingestions--a poison center based study

BACKGROUND

Very limited data is available regarding the safety of levetiracetam in cases of unintentional or intentional ingestions.

METHODS

All cases of single agent ingestions of levetiracetam, excluding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), reported to 61 American poison control centers during 2000-2009 were identified. Demographics, dose, symptoms, and medical outcome were abstracted from each case record.

RESULTS

A total of 222 cases of single agent levetiracetam ingestions were reported during the study period. Median age was 14.0 years (IQR: 2.0 years, 39.0 years) and 51.8% were female. In 207 of 222 cases (93.2%) medical outcome was known. No deaths were reported and only 1 (0.5%) case resulted in a major outcome and 3 (1.4%) cases resulted in moderate outcomes. Minor, minimal, or no effects were reported in 198 (89.2%) cases. In 27 (12.2%) cases, ingestion was intentional and in 192 (86.5%) unintentional. There were no major outcomes and only one case (1.4%) of moderate outcome in 74 children aged 6 years or less. All ingestions in these children were unintentional.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study with a limited number of cases, intentional and unintentional ingestions of levetiracetam were safe in the majority of cases.

Anesthetic management of the patient with epilepsy or prior seizures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epilepsy is a clinical disorder of paroxysmal recurring seizures, the diagnosis excluding alcohol or drug withdrawal seizures or such recurring exogenous events as repeated insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Epilepsy has a profound impact on each individual diagnosed with this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been a major change in the approach to management of patients with epilepsy. These drugs tend to have fewer significant drug interactions and less severe side effects. Nonetheless, first-generation AEDs are still widely used. Propofol and desflurane have reliable anticonvulsant effects, whereas remifentanil in larger doses and sevoflurane appear to support epileptiform activity, although the clinical significance of these observations is unclear.

SUMMARY

The primary concerns for providing anesthesia to the patient with epilepsy are the capacity of anesthetics to modulate or potentiate seizure activity and the interaction of anesthetic drugs with AEDs. Proconvulsant and anticonvulsant properties have been reported for virtually every anesthetic such that these properties become elements of the anesthetic plan in the patient with epilepsy. Moreover, AEDs have many physiologic and pharmacologic effects that can have an impact on an anesthetic.

Intravenous levetiracetam in children with seizures: a prospective safety study

In 2006, intravenous levetiracetam received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures in adults with epilepsy, 16 years or older. We have established the safety, tolerability, and dosage of intravenous levetiracetam in children. This prospective study included 30 children (6 months to <15 years of age). Patients were administered a single dose of intravenous levetiracetam (50 mg/kg, maximal dose 2500 mg) over 15 minutes. A blood level of levetiracetam was performed 10 minutes after the infusion. The treated children's average age was 6.3 years (range 0.5-14.8 years). The mean levetiracetam level was 83.3 microg/mL (range 47-128 microg/mL). There were no serious adverse reactions. Minor reactions included sleepiness, fatigue, and restlessness. An apparent decrease in seizure frequency across all seizure types was noted. The dose of 50 mg/kg was well tolerated by the patients and is a safe, appropriate loading dose.

Experience with intravenous levetiracetam in status epilepticus: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is a medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with the use of intravenous (IV) levetiracetam in patients with status epilepticus who had not responded to IV benzodiazepines.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the clinical charts of patients with status epilepticus who were treated with IV levetiracetam from July 2007 to July 2008 in our department was performed. Data on demographics, epileptic syndrome, aetiology, treatment dosage and adverse effects were analysed. IV levetiracetam was administered over a period of 15-30 minutes; each 500 mg of levetiracetam was diluted in 100 mL of normal saline.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (19 men and 15 women, 11-90 years old) with status epilepticus were treated with IV levetiracetam. Six patients (18%) had primarily generalized status epilepticus and 28 (82%) had focal status epilepticus. The aetiologies were: vascular (47%), cryptogenic (24%), tumours (12%), metabolic (12%) and brain anoxia (6%). The indications for administering IV levetiracetam were: no response to IV phenytoin and/or IV valproic acid (53% of patients) or to avoid adverse effects, contraindications or potential interactions (47% of patients). The median loading dose of IV levetiracetam was 1000 mg and the maintenance dosage ranged from 500 to 1500 mg/12 hours (median 1000 mg/12 hours). Status epilepticus stopped in a clear temporal relationship with IV levetiracetam in 71% of patients. IV levetiracetam was especially effective in older patients with vascular status epilepticus, while cryptogenic status epilepticus, primarily generalized status epilepticus, previous therapy with IV phenytoin and/or valproic acid and status epilepticus due to brain anoxia were associated with a poor response. There were no serious adverse events documented in the patients' charts.

CONCLUSIONS

While waiting for large, controlled studies, our data suggest that IV levetiracetam might be an alternative for the treatment of status epilepticus, especially in elderly patients with vascular status epilepticus and concomitant medical conditions.

Levetiracetam for managing neurologic and psychiatric disorders

PURPOSE

The role of levetiracetam in different epileptic, nonepileptic, neurologic, and psychiatric disorders is discussed.

SUMMARY

Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug (AED), was first approved as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial epilepsy in adults. It is currently being used in the treatment of multiple seizure disorders, including generalized tonic-clonic; absence; myoclonic, especially juvenile myoclonic; Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; and refractory epilepsy in children and adults. Data are emerging on possible uses of levetiracetam outside the realm of epilepsy because of its unique mechanisms of action. There is preliminary evidence about the efficacy of levetiracetam in the treatment of different psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, panic, stress, mood and bipolar, autism, and Tourette's syndrome. The most serious adverse effects associated with levetiracetam use are behavioral in nature and might be more common in patients with a history of psychiatric and neurobehavioral problems.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam is an effective AED with potential benefits in other neurologic and psychiatric disorders. The benefit-risk ratio in an individual patient with a specific condition should be used to determine its optimal use. Levetiracetam's use in nonepileptic conditions is not recommended until more data become available from larger trials.

Levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy: lack of correlation between plasma concentration and efficacy

PURPOSE

The goals of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as add-on therapy in children with refractory epilepsies and to determine the value of LEV blood level monitoring in this population.

METHODS

Sixty-nine children (39 males and 30 females) treated with LEV between 2006 and 2007 were selected. Their medical files were reviewed for LEV efficacy and tolerability. In a subgroup of children currently taking LEV, plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography by ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) method and correlated with the given dose per kilo as well as clinical response.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (74%) had a more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency with 16 patients (23%) becoming seizure free on LEV. Eighteen (26%) patients had a less than 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Adverse events due to LEV ranged from mild to moderate in only 18 patients (26%). The most frequently observed were drowsiness, behavioral difficulties, increase in seizure frequency and headaches. The majority (60.5%) of the responders received doses between 10 and 50mg/kg/day and had a plasma concentration (PC) between 5 and 40microg/ml. However, we found no clear correlation between PC and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam given twice a day in children with refractory epilepsy reduces seizure frequency in all types of epilepsy. In children, LEV is a broad spectrum anticonvulsant with a favourable safety profile.

Effects of levetiracetam on generalized discharges monitored with ambulatory EEG in epileptic patients

PURPOSE

Quantitative analysis of epileptiform discharges (EDs) before and after the initiation of an antiepileptic treatment is a useful tool to objectively documentate the efficacy of an antiepileptic drug (AED). Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of levetiracetam (LEV) on EDs, monitored with ambulatory EEG (A/EEG), in a limited series of patients with generalized epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed 24h A/EEG recording in basal condition and at follow-up after LEV therapy in 21 adult epileptic patients. Eleven received LEV as monotherapy and 10 as add-on. For each patient we quantified total epileptic activity considering the following parameters: total number, total duration, maximal duration and median duration of EDs. Self-reported information on the effect of LEV on clinical seizures was also collected, to determine the electro-clinical correlation.

RESULTS

A high variability of the response to LEV was observed in the monotherapy group, without statistical differences for all the parameters investigated. A significant reduction of the total number of seizures (113.6 vs. 41.2; p=.01) was observed in patients in add-on therapy. The modifications of epileptiform EEG abnormalities did not necessarily correlate with the self-reported clinical impressions.

DISCUSSION

The quantification of EDs monitored by A/EEG provides a useful objective support for evaluating the neurophysiologic profile and the real efficacy of an antiepileptic treatment. In our patients LEV was able to significantly reduce the EDs only in add-on therapy. Further larger studies are necessary to clarify the effects of LEV on electro-clinical features of generalized epilepsy.

Pyridoxine supplementation for the treatment of levetiracetam-induced behavior side effects in children: preliminary results

Behavioral side effects related to the use of levetiracetam (LEV) in epilepsy are increasingly being recognized. Patients followed in our center have reported improvement of these side effects after starting pyridoxine (vitamin B(6)) supplements. Using mailed questionnaires, retrospective chart reviews, and phone call follow-ups, we analyzed 42 pediatric patients who had been treated with LEV and pyridoxine. Twenty-two patients started pyridoxine after being on LEV, and significant behavioral improvement was observed in nine (41%), no effect in eight (36%), deterioration in four (18%), and an uncertain effect in one. The effects of pyridoxine supplementation were observed during the first week. The remaining patients (20) were already on pyridoxine before LEV was started, started pyridoxine and LEV at the same time, or took pyridoxine intermittently. Pyridoxine is an easily available, inexpensive, and safe therapeutic option. Given these preliminary results, we plan to conduct a placebo-controlled cross-over study to better characterize these observations.

Cognitive fMRI and soluble telencephalin assessment in patients with localization-related epilepsy

Objectives - The use of telencephalin as a possible marker for altered cortical function as demonstrated by functional MRI was investigated in a pilot study with 16 patients with localization-related epilepsy and secondarily generalized seizures. Materials and methods - Functional MRI of verbal working memory performance (Sternberg paradigm) and self-regulatory control processes (Stroop paradigm) was used to examine cortical activation in 16 patients with localization-related epilepsy and secondarily generalized seizures. Additionally, blood serum concentrations of soluble telencephalin (marker for neuronal damage) were determined. Results - In three patients (one temporal and two frontal focus), telencephalin was detected. All three patients had lower functional MRI activation in the frontotemporal region (P = 0.04), but not in other regions (P > 0.35) compared with patients without detectable telencephalin. Additionally, an association of levetiracetam and frontotemporal activation was observed. Conclusions - These preliminary data in a heterogeneous group suggest an association between decreased frontotemporal activation on fMRI and both detectable telencephalin serum levels and levetiracetam use. Future longitudinal studies with larger patient groups are required to confirm these observations. It is hypothesized that altered local function of the frontotemporal cortex in localization-related epilepsy might be better predicted by the biochemical marker telencephalin than epilepsy characteristics such as seizure focus.

Intravenous levetiracetam: treatment experience with the first 50 critically ill patients

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug with no known interactions and a favorable profile of adverse events. These properties make it a good candidate for use in critically ill patients. An intravenous formulation of LEV was recently approved. The present study retrospectively assesses the safety and efficacy of LEV in the first 50 critically ill patients treated with intravenous LEV. Indications for use were seizure prophylaxis, acute symptomatic seizures, and all forms of status epilepticus. There were no major adverse effects, although less prominent changes may have been masked by the already severely compromised condition of these patients. Two patients (4%) had transiently lowered platelet counts (55,000 and 82,000, respectively). Efficacy, defined as cessation of seizure activity or prevention of its recurrence, was observed in 41 of 50 patients (82%). Antiepileptic treatment of critically ill patients with LEV seems to be effective and safe according to the data for this small cohort, but this observation warrants further prospective investigation in a larger number of patients.

Levetiracetam inhibits both ryanodine and IP3 receptor activated calcium induced calcium release in hippocampal neurons in culture

Epilepsy affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide, and there is a pressing need to develop new anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) and understand their mechanisms of action. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a novel AED and despite its increasingly widespread clinical use, its mechanism of action is as yet undetermined. Intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) regulation by both inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptors (IP3R) and ryanodine receptors (RyR) has been implicated in epileptogenesis and the maintenance of epilepsy. To this end, we investigated the effect of LEV on RyR and IP3R activated calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) in hippocampal neuronal cultures. RyR-mediated CICR was stimulated using the well-characterized RyR activator, caffeine. Caffeine (10mM) caused a significant increase in [Ca2+]i in hippocampal neurons. Treatment with LEV (33 microM) prior to stimulation of RyR-mediated CICR by caffeine led to a 61% decrease in the caffeine induced peak height of [Ca2+]i when compared to the control. Bradykinin stimulates IP3R-activated CICR-to test the effect of LEV on IP3R-mediated CICR, bradykinin (1 microM) was used to stimulate cells pre-treated with LEV (100 microM). The data showed that LEV caused a 74% decrease in IP3R-mediated CICR compared to the control. In previous studies we have shown that altered Ca2+ homeostatic mechanisms play a role in seizure activity and the development of spontaneous recurrent epileptiform discharges (SREDs). Elevations in [Ca2+]i mediated by CICR systems have been associated with neurotoxicity, changes in neuronal plasticity, and the development of AE. Thus, the ability of LEV to modulate the two major CICR systems demonstrates an important molecular effect of this agent on a major second messenger system in neurons.

Common problems in critically ill obstetric patients, with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy

Pharmacological treatment of critically ill obstetric patients can be especially challenging due to the complexity of caring for 2 patients, with a paucity of research to support practice. This review will provide practitioners with primary recommendations for management of the critical illnesses most commonly encountered in pregnancy and will discuss the scientific and clinical merit of these recommendations.