1
|
Lyu X, Cui Y, Kong Y, Yang M, Shen H, Liao S, Li S, An C, Wang H, Zhang Z, Ong J, Li Y, Du P. A transient transcriptional activation governs unpolarized-to-polarized morphogenesis during embryo implantation. Mol Cell 2024; 84:2665-2681.e13. [PMID: 38955180 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
During implantation, embryos undergo an unpolarized-to-polarized transition to initiate postimplantation morphogenesis. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is unknown. Here, we identify a transient transcriptional activation governing embryonic morphogenesis and pluripotency transition during implantation. In naive pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which represent preimplantation embryos, we find that the microprocessor component DGCR8 can recognize stem-loop structures within nascent mRNAs to sequester transcriptional coactivator FLII to suppress transcription directly. When mESCs exit from naive pluripotency, the ERK/RSK/P70S6K pathway rapidly activates, leading to FLII phosphorylation and disruption of DGCR8/FLII interaction. Phosphorylated FLII can bind to transcription factor JUN, activating cell migration-related genes to establish poised pluripotency akin to implanting embryos. Resequestration of FLII by DGCR8 drives poised ESCs into formative pluripotency. In summary, we identify a DGCR8/FLII/JUN-mediated transient transcriptional activation mechanism. Disruption of this mechanism inhibits naive-poised-formative pluripotency transition and the corresponding unpolarized-to-polarized transition during embryo implantation, which are conserved in mice and humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehui Lyu
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yingzi Cui
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yinfei Kong
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Min Yang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Hui Shen
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Shuyun Liao
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Shiyu Li
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Chenrui An
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Haoyi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jennie Ong
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yan Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Peng Du
- MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Advanced Center of RNA Biology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laosuntisuk K, Vennapusa A, Somayanda IM, Leman AR, Jagadish SK, Doherty CJ. A normalization method that controls for total RNA abundance affects the identification of differentially expressed genes, revealing bias toward morning-expressed responses. THE PLANT JOURNAL : FOR CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2024; 118:1241-1257. [PMID: 38289828 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
RNA-Sequencing is widely used to investigate changes in gene expression at the transcription level in plants. Most plant RNA-Seq analysis pipelines base the normalization approaches on the assumption that total transcript levels do not vary between samples. However, this assumption has not been demonstrated. In fact, many common experimental treatments and genetic alterations affect transcription efficiency or RNA stability, resulting in unequal transcript abundance. The addition of synthetic RNA controls is a simple correction that controls for variation in total mRNA levels. However, adding spike-ins appropriately is challenging with complex plant tissue, and carefully considering how they are added is essential to their successful use. We demonstrate that adding external RNA spike-ins as a normalization control produces differences in RNA-Seq analysis compared to traditional normalization methods, even between two times of day in untreated plants. We illustrate the use of RNA spike-ins with 3' RNA-Seq and present a normalization pipeline that accounts for differences in total transcriptional levels. We evaluate the effect of normalization methods on identifying differentially expressed genes in the context of identifying the effect of the time of day on gene expression and response to chilling stress in sorghum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanjana Laosuntisuk
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amaranatha Vennapusa
- Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Delaware State University, Dover, Delaware, USA
| | - Impa M Somayanda
- Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 79410, USA
| | - Adam R Leman
- Department of Science and Technology, The Good Food Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, 20090, USA
| | - Sv Krishna Jagadish
- Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 79410, USA
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506, USA
| | - Colleen J Doherty
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wille CK, Zhang X, Haws SA, Denu JM, Sridharan R. DOT1L is a barrier to histone acetylation during reprogramming to pluripotency. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadf3980. [PMID: 37976354 PMCID: PMC10656071 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have transcriptionally permissive chromatin enriched for gene activation-associated histone modifications. A striking exception is DOT1L-mediated H3K79 dimethylation (H3K79me2) that is considered a positive regulator of transcription. We find that ESCs are depleted for H3K79me2 at shared locations of enrichment with somatic cells, which are highly and ubiquitously expressed housekeeping genes, and have lower RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) at the transcription start site (TSS) despite greater nascent transcription. Inhibiting DOT1L increases the efficiency of reprogramming of somatic to induced pluripotent stem cells, enables an ESC-like RNAPII pattern at the TSS, and functionally compensates for enforced RNAPII pausing. DOT1L inhibition increases H3K27 methylation and RNAPII elongation-enhancing histone acetylation without changing the expression of the causal histone-modifying enzymes. Only the maintenance of elevated histone acetylation is essential for enhanced reprogramming and occurs at loci that are depleted for H3K79me2. Thus, DOT1L inhibition promotes the hyperacetylation and hypertranscription pluripotent properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coral K. Wille
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
| | - Xiaoya Zhang
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
- Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Spencer A. Haws
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - John M. Denu
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Rupa Sridharan
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santana JF, Collins GS, Parida M, Luse DS, Price D. Differential dependencies of human RNA polymerase II promoters on TBP, TAF1, TFIIB and XPB. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:9127-9148. [PMID: 35947745 PMCID: PMC9458433 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of rapid acute depletion of components of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) general transcription factors (GTFs) that are thought to be critical for formation of preinitiation complexes (PICs) and initiation in vitro were quantified in HAP1 cells using precision nuclear run-on sequencing (PRO-Seq). The average dependencies for each factor across >70 000 promoters varied widely even though levels of depletions were similar. Some of the effects could be attributed to the presence or absence of core promoter elements such as the upstream TBP-specificity motif or downstream G-rich sequences, but some dependencies anti-correlated with such sequences. While depletion of TBP had a large effect on most Pol III promoters only a small fraction of Pol II promoters were similarly affected. TFIIB depletion had the largest general effect on Pol II and also correlated with apparent termination defects downstream of genes. Our results demonstrate that promoter activity is combinatorially influenced by recruitment of TFIID and sequence-specific transcription factors. They also suggest that interaction of the preinitiation complex (PIC) with nucleosomes can affect activity and that recruitment of TFIID containing TBP only plays a positive role at a subset of promoters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan F Santana
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Geoffrey S Collins
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Mrutyunjaya Parida
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Donal S Luse
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|