Efficacy and short-term side effects of sitagliptin, vildagliptin and saxagliptin in Chinese diabetes: a randomized clinical trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Astragalus as an Adjuvant Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the beneficial and potential adverse effects of Astragalus in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The authors searched for randomized controlled trials of Astragalus treatment for patients with T2DM in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), Wanfang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database (CQVIP), and SinoMed. Two reviewers conducted independent selection of studies, data extraction, and coding, as well as the assessment of risk of bias in the studies included. Standard meta-analysis and, if appropriate, meta-regression were performed using the STATA, v.15.1, software. Results: This meta-analysis encompasses 20 studies and a total of 953 participants. Compared to the control group (CG), the observation group (OG) decreased fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD = -0.67, 95% CI: -1.13∼-0.20, P = 0.005), 2 hours postprandial plasma glucose (2hPG) (WMD = -0.67 (95% CI: -1.13∼-0.20, P=0.005), glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (WMD = -0.93, 95% CI: -1.22∼-0.64, P = 0.000), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (WMD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.99∼0.99, P = 0.104), insulin sensitive index (WMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.13-0.72, P = 0.004). The total effective ratio of the OG is more effective than CG (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.26-1.40, P = 0.000), the significant effective ratio (RR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.48-1.93, P = 0.000). Conclusions: Astragalus may provide specific benefits for T2DM patients as an adjuvant treatment. Nonetheless, the certainty of the evidence and risk of bias fell short of optimal performance, indicating the need for additional clinical research to ascertain potential effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022338491.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring as an Additional Tool in Early Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes Monitoring and in Evaluation of Short-Term Sitagliptin Response

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a complication associated with a negative prognosis in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the widely recommended screening test for CFRD diagnosis, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly considered a useful and easy-to-perform test for diagnosis and follow-up in clinical practice. Regarding CFRD treatment, although insulin is the classic approved pharmacological option, incretins could also be a helpful alternative in early stages. CGM could be also a useful tool to measure the early response to this therapy.

METHODS

We studied 25 CF patients with abnormal OGTT results and compared glucose and insulin levels during the OGTTs with CGM results as a tool for early CFRD diagnosis. In addition, we evaluated glycaemic control with CGM before and after treatment with sitagliptin.

RESULTS

A correlation was found between lower plasma insulin levels during the OGTTs and higher average sensor glucose (p = 0.009) and hyperglycaemic excursions (p = 0.017). The CGM data on sitagliptin treatment (n = 25) showed an average glycaemic improvement from 124.2 to 117.2 mg/dL (p = 0.002) with a 5.6-point standard deviation of glucose decrease (p < 0.001). Hyperglycaemic excursions ≥200 mg/dL diminished 57.1% (p = 0.021). Both time in range and time above 180 mg/dL improved during treatment (p = 0.036 and p = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CGM is a useful tool that offers valuable information for both the diagnosis and the management of CFRD. Lower plasma insulin levels during OGTTs are associated with a poor ambulatory glucose profile in CGM. Sitagliptin could play an important role in the treatment of the early stages of CFRD.

Effect of Sitagliptin Versus Glibenclamide on Glycemic Markers, Lipid Profile Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Factors in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives:Diabetes mellitus is leading to chronic complications, including cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of Sitagliptin and Glibenclamide on glycemic markers, lipid profile inflammatory, and oxidative stress factors in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=54). The treatment group (27 patients) received 100 mg of Sitagliptin once daily + 500 mg Metformin twice daily, orally, for 12 weeks, and the control group (27 patients) was given 5 mg of Glibenclamide once daily + 500 mg Metformin twice daily, also orally, for 12 weeks. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lipid profile [cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG)], fasting blood sugar (FBS) and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index (BMI) were measured before and after the study. Results:In both groups, the FBS level was significantly reduced from baseline (P=0.03 in the Sitagliptin group and P=0.02 in the Glibenclamide one). The percent of HbA1c was also significantly reduced from baseline in both the Sitagliptin group (P=0.01) and the Glibenclamide one (P=0.008). However, comparing the groups, these changes were not different. In the Sitagliptin group, IL-6 was significantly reduced from baseline (P=0.01) as well as in comparison with the Glibenclamide group (P=0.001). The TG level was significantly lower than the baseline in the Sitagliptin group (P=0.03), so changes between groups were significant (P=0.04). Weight and BMI were significantly increased from baseline in the Glibenclamide group (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), and their changes between the two groups were also significant (P=0.001). Conclusion:These finding support the favorable effects of Sitagliptin on cardiovascular risks beyond its advantages on insulin-glucose hemostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Vildagliptin alleviates liver fibrosis in NASH diabetic rats via modulation of insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and inflammatory cascades

AIMS

This study investigates the therapeutic potential of Vilda in a NASH model with liver fibrosis and elucidates the underlying molecular mechanisms.

MAIN METHODS

To induce NASH, male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a high-fat diet for 24 weeks with a single dose of STZ (40 mg/kg, IP). Vilda was orally administered at two doses (10 and 20 mg/kg) for 20 weeks.

KEY FINDINGS

The induction of NASH was validated by abnormalities in hepatotoxicity indices, lipid profile, oxidative stress markers, and pathologically by marked fat deposition in hepatic tissues together with severe inflammatory cell infiltration. Moreover, NASH-affected rats demonstrated reduced insulin sensitivity manifested as elevated fasting blood glucose levels and disrupted homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance. Vilda, at both doses, effectively abrogated all these pathological features of NASH. Mechanistically, these hepatoprotective properties of Vilda can be attributed to its antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory effects (by inhibiting the TNF-α, NF-κB, JNK, and JAK/STAT pathways), and insulin-sensitizing effect (by upregulating the IRS-1/PI3K/Akt pathway). Besides, Vilda successfully counteracted NASH-associated liver fibrosis by downregulating the TGF-β1 pathway.

SIGNIFICANCE

The hepatoprotective and antifibrotic effects of Vilda were mostly dose-dependent. Collectively, this study offered a promising therapeutic avenue for Vilda as a novel strategy for counteracting the pathological progression of NASH and associated liver fibrosis.

Citrus Flavanone Narirutin, In Vitro and In Silico Mechanistic Antidiabetic Potential

Citrus fruits and juices have been studied extensively for their potential involvement in the prevention of various diseases. Flavanones, the characteristic polyphenols of citrus species, are the primarily compounds responsible for these studied health benefits. Using in silico and in vitro methods, we are exploring the possible antidiabetic action of narirutin, a flavanone family member. The goal of the in silico research was to anticipate how narirutin would interact with eight distinct receptors implicated in diabetes control and complications, namely, dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4), protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1), aldose reductase (AldR), glycogen phosphorylase (GP), alpha-amylase (AAM), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), alpha-glucosidase (AGL), while the in vitro study looked into narirutin’s possible inhibitory impact on alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase. The results indicate that the studied citrus flavanone interacted remarkably with most of the receptors and had an excellent inhibitory activity during the in vitro tests suggesting its potent role among the different constituent of the citrus compounds in the management of diabetes and also its complications.

Efficacy and safety profile of Sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and metformin in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects

Type-2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic and progressive disease that requires long-term management. Thus, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4) need more investigations about their efficacy and safety profile as there is still no evidence of whether DPP-4 inhibitors can be used as 1st line option for type2 diabetes drug naïve patients. In this randomized case-controlled study, 60 drug-naïve type 2 diabetic subjects were randomized into 3 groups, each group comprising 20 subjects. Group 1 was given sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, Group 2 was given vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily, and Group 3 served as the control group and was given Metformin 1gm twice daily. Efficacy endpoints included changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hr postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and the secondary endpoints were related to safety profile were the assessment of liver and kidney function tests and complete blood count (CBC). All treatment regimens had comparable efficacy and safety profiles with the non-significant relative superiority of vildagliptin in lowering HbA1c more than sitagliptin but significant (p=0.011) regarding FPG reduction, vildagliptin significantly decreased HbA1c by -1.02 % (P< 0.001), sitagliptin significantly decreased HbA1c by -0.96% (P< 0.001), and control significantly decreased HbA1c by -0.90% (P< 0.001) compared with baseline. The studied drugs showed moderate efficacy in lowering HbA1c levels with the non-significant relative higher efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors and metformin showed favorable effects on improving metabolic syndrome by decreasing blood pressure, serum triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol, and increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL), plus their positive impacts on weight. As a final conclusion, the three medications are highly comparable.

Effect of Add-On Therapy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on Adipokines in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Excess adiposity is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease due to metabolic changes in the body. Visceral obesity increases the risk of diabetes mellitus through adipocytokines and hence the effective targeting therapies are essential to control obesity in high-risk individuals. The study's main objective was to evaluate the effect of add-on therapy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on visceral fat-associated serum adipokines.

Methods

The study included 90 subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The blood samples were taken before starting first-line therapy with metformin, 12 weeks after starting metformin therapy and 12 weeks after starting add-on therapy. Serum adipokines were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was estimated with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The biochemical variables were measured using Cobas^® 6000 analyzer.

Results

The mean adiponectin level was significantly elevated with add-on therapy using SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors (P < 0.001). The mean retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and visfatin levels were reduced considerably (P < 0.001). The SGLT2 inhibitors are more effective on serum FABP4 in patients with type 2 diabetes (P = 0.038). The mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) and HbA1c levels were reduced significantly with add-on therapy (P < 0.001). Lipid profile was also altered significantly with this add-on therapy (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results indicate that add-on therapy exerts a beneficial effect in type 2 diabetic patients insufficiently controlled with metformin only by altering the visceral fat-associated adipokine levels and controlling the metabolic activities.

Cardiovascular risk of sitagliptin in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a very high risk of cardiovascular related events, and reducing complications is an important evaluation criterion of efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic drugs. Previous studies have shown that the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (DPP4i), such as sitagliptin, might reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin remains controversial, especially the safety for cardiovascular related events. Here, a systematic review was conducted to assess the cardiovascular safety of sitagliptin in T2DM patients. The literature research dating up to October 2018 was performed in the electronic database. The clinical trials about sitagliptin for T2DM patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the MACE, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Finally, 32 clinical trials composed of 16082 T2DM patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that: there was no significant difference between sitagliptin group and the control group on MACE (odds ratio (OR) = 0.85, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.63–1.15), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.38–1.16), stroke (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44–1.54) and mortality (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.26–1.07). These results demonstrated that sitagliptin did not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.