Giant prolactinomas in women

Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: male-specific differences in pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment

Prolactinomas (PRLomas) constitute approximately half of all pituitary adenomas and approximately one-fifth of them are diagnosed in males. The clinical presentation of PRLomas results from direct prolactin (PRL) action, duration and severity of hyperprolactinemia, and tumor mass effect. Male PRLomas, compared to females, tend to be larger and more invasive, are associated with higher PRL concentration at diagnosis, present higher proliferative potential, are more frequently resistant to standard pharmacotherapy, and thus may require multimodal approach, including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and alternative medical agents. Therefore, the management of PRLomas in men is challenging in many cases. Additionally, hyperprolactinemia is associated with a significant negative impact on men's health, including sexual function and fertility potential, bone health, cardiovascular and metabolic complications, leading to decreased quality of life. In this review, we highlight the differences in pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of PRLomas concerning the male sex.

Giant prolactinoma in Asian-Indians: A single-center experience from Western India

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinomas (GP) are rare tumors accounting for 4.3% of prolactinomas, with paucity of literature from India. We aim to describe clinical, biochemical, radiological, and treatment outcomes in a large series of Asian-Indian patients with GP.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of GPs (n=84), age-based (adults: 66 versus pediatric: 18) and gender-based (males: 64 versus females: 20) comparison was done.

RESULTS

The mean age at presentation was 34.1±13years, and 64 (76.2%) were males. Males were younger at presentation (32.1±12.2 versus 40.1±13.8years, P: 0.01). The majority presented with mass-effect-related manifestations (visual disturbances: 91.6%, headache: 84.5%) and/or hypogonadism (98.7%). At baseline, largest tumor dimension was 5.3±1.0cm, and serum prolactin was 8343 (3865.5-12,306) ng/mL; most (94.6%) had gonadal axis involvement. Dopamine-agonist (DA) as first-line therapy (45/67, 67.2%) achieved normoprolactinemia (maximum cabergoline dose: 2.0±1.2mg/week) in 36/45 (80%) and tumor response (≥50% reduction) in 36/37 (97.3%) patients at the last follow-up (median duration: 33 [14.5-53.5]months). Notably, gonadal axis recovery was poor (6/30, 20%) despite normoprolactinemia post-DA monotherapy. At latest follow-up, secondary hypothyroidism (32.5% versus 82.6%, P: 0.001) and central hypocortisolism (5.6% versus 42.9%, P: 0.007) were less frequent in DA monotherapy (n=43) than in multimodal therapy group (n=23). The proportion of males (94.4% versus 71.2%, P: 0.04) was higher in the pediatric age group, with DA-induced (first-line) normoprolactinemia observed in 66.7% of them.

CONCLUSION

GP has male predominance, DA as first-line therapy normalized prolactin in four-fifths of patients with better preservation of HPT and HPA axes in patients with DA monotherapy.

Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas-A Swedish Nationwide Study

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in a nationwide cohort of patients with giant prolactinomas.

METHODS

Register-based study of patients with giant prolactinomas [serum prolactin (PRL) > 1000 µg/L, tumor diameter ≥40 mm] identified in the Swedish Pituitary Register 1991-2018.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients [mean age 47 (SD ±16) years, 89% men] were included in the study. At diagnosis, the median PRL was 6305 µg/L (range 1450-253 000), the median tumor diameter was 47 mm (range 40-85), 84% of the patients had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and 71% visual field defects. All patients were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) at some point. Twenty-three (27%) received 1 or more additional therapies, including surgery (n = 19), radiotherapy (n = 6), other medical treatments (n = 4), and chemotherapy (n = 2). Ki-67 was ≥10% in 4/14 tumors. At the last follow-up [median 9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4-15)], the median PRL was 12 µg/L (IQR 4-126), and the median tumor diameter was 22 mm (IQR 3-40). Normalized PRL was achieved in 55%, significant tumor reduction in 69%, and combined response (normalized PRL and significant tumor reduction) in 43%. In the primary DA-treated patients (n = 79), the reduction in PRL or tumor size after the first year predicted the combined response at the last follow-up (P < .001 and P = .012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

DAs effectively reduced PRL and tumor size, but approximately 1 patient out of 4 needed multimodal treatment. Our results suggest that the response to DA after 1 year is useful for identifying patients who need more careful monitoring and, in some cases, additional treatment.

Giant prolactinomas, a detailed analysis of 196 adult cases

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinomas are a rare entity, representing approximately 5% of all prolactinomas. A systematic review of 196 adult cases was performed. A comparison of the clinical, biochemical and radiological characteristics, management and therapeutic outcomes in men versus women is made.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted using the term 'giant prolactinoma'. Following inclusion criteria were used: diameter ≥ 40 mm, prolactin levels > 1000 ng/ml and no concomitant GH/ ACTH secretion.

RESULTS

196 cases were included [age: 38 (28-50) years, F/M ratio: 1/3.6]. Median tumor diameter was 53 (43-69) mm. Pituitary deficiency was present in 91% of cases, with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism being the most frequent. Most common presenting symptoms were visual impairment (73%) and headache (50%) in men and amenorrhea (58%) in women. 82% of cases were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment which led to normoprolactinemia, tumor shrinkage and visual improvement in 51%, 88% and 85% of cases, respectively. Surgery was performed in 29% of cases and all showed tumor remnant and persistent hyperprolactinemia. Women had a lower prolactin level and a smaller tumor diameter at diagnosis but pituitary deficiencies were more frequent and outcome was worse.

CONCLUSION

Giant prolactinomas are rare and have a male predominance. Visual impairment is the most frequent presenting symptom in men and amenorrhea in women. The gender-related difference in tumor size and level of prolactin was confirmed in this analysis where men had a larger diameter and a higher baseline prolactin level. DAs are the treatment of choice, irrespective of tumor size and presence of visual impairment. As only half of the cases achieved normoprolactinemia we do not, in contrast to previous literature, state giant prolactinomas to be exquisitely sensitive to DAs. Patient characteristics associated with persistent hyperprolactinemia after treatment with a DA were female gender, higher baseline prolactin and larger tumor size . This analysis did show TSH- and ACTH-deficiency to be more frequent after surgery which was not seen for LH/FSH deficiency.

De Novo Psychiatric Disorders in a Woman With Giant Prolactinoma Treated With Cabergoline

Dopamine agonists are the first-line treatment of prolactinomas. The risk of developing de novo psychiatric symptoms during dopamine agonist therapy is low. Herein, we report the case of a 42-year-old woman with a giant prolactinoma who developed a psychiatric disorder after 1 day of cabergoline therapy initiation. She presented with amenorrhea, galactorrhea, headaches, and disturbed vision. Biological investigations revealed hyperprolactinemia (2975 ng/ml) with gonadotropin deficiency. Pituitary MRI showed a giant pituitary adenoma. The patient was treated with cabergoline at the dose of 1 mg twice weekly. One day after the treatment initiation, she developed acute delirium with temporospatial disorientation and compulsive medication use. These symptoms disappeared 1 week after the reduction of the dose of cabergoline. Patients with hyperprolactinemia receiving an initial high dose of cabergoline may develop changes in mood and behavior regardless of prior psychiatric history.

An update on, and genetics of refractory adenomas of childhood

Pituitary adenomas in childhood tend to be more frequently due to germline genetic changes and are often diagnosed at late stages due to delayed recognition by pediatricians and other caretakers who are not familiar with this rare disease in childhood. As a result, often, pediatric pituitary adenomas are aggressive or remain refractory to treatment. In this review, we discuss germline genetic defects that account for the most common pediatric pituitary adenomas that are refractory to treatment. We also discuss some somatic genetic events, such as chromosomal copy number changes that characterize some of the most aggressive pituitary adenomas in childhood that end up being refractory to treatment.

Surgical Management of Giant Prolactinomas: A Descriptive Study

Introduction

Giant prolactinoma (GP) is a rare pituitary lactotropic cell tumor larger than 4 cm in its widest dimension, and is less likely than a smaller prolactinoma to achieve prolactin normalization on dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy. There is a paucity of data on the circumstances and outcomes of second-line management of GP with surgery. Herein, our institution's experience with the surgical management of GPs is described.

Methods

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent surgery for giant prolactinoma from 2003 to 2018. A chart review was conducted for demographic data, clinical features, laboratory and radiographic findings, operative and pathology reports, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes in follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results

Of 79 prolactinoma cases, 8 patients had GP with a median age of 38 years (range 20-53), 75% (6/8) were male, with a median largest tumor dimension of 6 cm (range 4.6-7.7), and a median prolactin level of 2,500 μg/L (range 100->13,000). Six patients had transsphenoidal surgery for dopamine agonist (DA) resistance or intolerance. Two patients had a craniotomy for a missed diagnosis; one was due to the hook effect. No tumor resections were complete by either surgical approach; all had persistent hyperprolactinemia requiring postoperative DA therapy, and two patients had an additional craniotomy procedure for further tumor debulking. There was no recovery of pituitary axes and postoperative deficits were common. Remission as defined by prolactin normalization occurred in 63% (5/8) at a median time of 36 months (range 14-63 months) on DA therapy after surgery with a follow-up of 3-13 years.

Conclusions

GPs infrequently require surgical resection, which is generally incomplete and requires adjuvant therapy. Given the rarity of surgery for GPs, multi-institutional or registry studies would yield clearer guidance on optimal management.

Giant prolactinoma in children and adolescents: a single-center experience and systematic review

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinoma (GP) in childhood and adolescence is a rare entity with scarce literature. We aimed to describe clinical features, biochemistry, radiology, genetics, management, and outcome in pediatric (≤ 20 years) GP.

METHODS

Retrospective record review of 18 pediatric GP patients from our center and systematic review including these and 77 from the literature (total cohort: 95).

RESULTS

GP constituted 20% of our pediatric prolactinoma cohort. In the total cohort (age: 15.4 ± 3.5 years), the majority (77, 82.8%) were males. Mass effect symptoms (88.6%), and pubertal delay/arrest in males (82.1%) were frequent. Median basal prolactin was 8649 (3246-17,532) ng/ml and the maximum tumor dimension was 5.5 ± 1.5 cm. MEN1 and AIP mutations were noted in 7 (21.9%) and 6 (18.8%) patients, respectively. Males with central hypogonadism had baseline bi-testicular volume of 20.2 ± 8.4 cc, lower LH than FSH (-2.04 ± 0.9 vs. -0.7 ± 1.6 SDS, p = 0.0075), and mostly, normal inhibin B. Majority (49/76, 64.5%) received dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment with additional therapy in 35% (17/49). DA monotherapy arm had less frequent central hypothyroidism (42.9% vs 87.1%, p = 0.002) and central adrenal insufficiency (7.1% vs 66.7%, p = 0.0003) than multimodal therapy. A smaller tumor dimension (4.7 vs. 5.7 cm, p = 0.04) was associated with normoprolactinemia on DA monotherapy and AIP mutations (33.3% vs. nil, p = 0.02) with multimodal therapy.

CONCLUSION

GP is characterized by male predominance with frequent delay/arrest of puberty (82%), but relative sparing of the FSH-inhibin B axis in boys. DA monotherapy may be preferred as the first-line therapy in pediatric GP.

Prolactinomas

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

Hyperprolactinemia in the postmenopause: versions and contraversions

The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia in postmenopausal women is unknown and has been estimated as infrequent by many studies. Prolactinomas found after menopause are usually macroadenomas and remain unrecognized for a long time due to atypical clinical signs or their absence. The growth potential of prolactinomas persists after menopause, most of them are invasive and accompanied by high prolactin levels. Treatment with dopamine agonists is usually long-term, the goals of which are to reduce tumor size, normalize prolactin levels and the negative effects of hyperprolactinemia. Treatment with cabergoline makes it possible to achieve remission of the disease in the first years after discontinuation, however, the proportion of relapses in postmenopausal women increases 5 years after discontinuation of the drug. Remission of prolactinomas is not evident in postmenopausal women. The modern management of patients with prolactinoma and/or hyperprolactinemia does not have clear positions in the postmenopausal period. Controversial issues remain: an ambiguous relationship between prolactin levels and breast cancer, there are no convincing conclusions on the improvement of bone mineral density and/or a decrease in the risk of fractures with normalization of prolactin levels, there are no data on metabolic parameters after the end of treatment with dopamine agonists, conflicting information about the relationship of prolactin levels and the severity of the manifold manifestations of the climacteric syndrome. The use of estrogen-progestin drugs in women with hyperprolactinemia/prolactinomas is also not well understood. Thus, the problem of hyperprolactinemia in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal period is underestimated and requires additional research, as well as the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for potential benefits in terms of weight loss, improving insulin sensitivity, reducing the risk of fractures, maintaining sexuality and psycho-emotional well-being.

Pituitary apoplexy of a giant prolactinoma during pregnancy

AIMS AND METHODS

Prolactinomas are a common cause of sexual dysfunction and infertility. We aimed, through this case report, to illustrate the difficulties of management of women with giant prolactinoma, especially in cases of desire of pregnancy.

RESULTS

A 30-year-old woman was referred to our department for secondary amenorrhea. Investigations showed a prolactin level of 5168 ng/mL and giant pituitary adenoma of 4 cm in diameter. Cytoreductive surgery was performed after failure to normalize prolactin levels during three years with medical treatment by cabergoline. After seven months, menstrual cycles have resumed, and after 13 months, the patient became pregnant. At 22nd week of gestation, she was admitted in our hospital for pituitary apoplexy. Medical treatment with bromocriptine was chosen. The vaginal premature delivery at 28 weeks gave birth to twins weighing 1 Kg each who died on the 7th day of life.

CONCLUSION

This is a relevant clinical case that illustrates the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery in case of insufficient response to dopamine agonists to restore gonadal function. The possibility of a pregnancy should be considered in these patients since it can be associated with high maternal and fetal risks.

Comparison of the effects of medical and surgical treatments in giant prolactinoma: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

Giant prolactinomas, which have extremely large sizes and high prolactin (PRL) values, are rarely seen. Although medical therapy is effective, surgical treatment is more frequently applied due to slightly lower response rates and compression symptoms. This study aimed to compare the medical and surgical treatment results in giant prolactinomas.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients who were followed up in our center for giant prolactinoma were included in the study, and the response rates of the patients were evaluated after the medical and surgical treatments. The treatment responses were compared in terms of tumor volume, PRL level, visual field, and pituitary function.

RESULTS

The outcomes of the 66 treatment periods (medical n = 42; surgical n = 24) in 39 patients (mean age, 47.2 years; men, 89.7%) were evaluated. The most common presentations were hypogonadism and visual defects. The mean longest tumor diameter at diagnosis was 52.2 ± 11.8 mm, and the median PRL levels were 5000 ng/mL. PRL level normalization was achieved in 69% with medical therapy, and a curative response was obtained in only two patients with surgery. Tumor volume reduction was 67% (no cure) in the medical and 75% (13% cure) in the surgical groups (p = 0.39). Improvement of visual field was 70.8% in the medical and 84.2% in the surgical group (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

In our study, it was observed that medical therapy was effective and safe in patients with giant prolactinomas. The use of surgical treatment should be limited to prolactinomas with compression or post-resistance to medical treatment in serious cases.

Autophagy inhibition enhances anti-pituitary adenoma effect of tetrandrine

Pituitary adenoma (PA) is a benign intracranial neoplasm originated from pituitary gland. Surgery is the first-line therapy for most of PAs, but lead to unsatisfactory prognosis in some cases. Tetrandrine (Tet) has anticancer effect on some cancers. However, growth inhibition effect on PA is unknown. To elucidate the inhibitory effect of Tet on the growth of PA and its potential mechanisms, we validated the in vitro and in vivo anti-PA effect of Tet and illustrated the cellular and molecular alterations by confocal microscopy observation, flow cytometry, and RNA interference. Tet inhibited PA cell growth in vitro and tumor progression in vivo. Tet induced autophagy and apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Low dosage (1.25 μM) of Tet induced PA cell autophagy by down-regulation of MAPK/STAT3 signal. While, higher dosage (5.0 μM) of Tet partially induced PA cell death through caspase-dependent apoptosis. Autophagy inhibitors enhanced Tet-induced caspase activity and apoptotic cell death. These findings demonstrated that Tet has anti-PA effect by inducing autophagy and apoptosis through MAPK/STAT3 signaling pathway attenuation and autophagy inhibition might enhance its anti-PA effect, indicating that Tet (or combined with autophagy inhibitor) is a potential therapeutic regimen for PAs.

Clinical Features, Therapeutic Trends, and Outcome of Giant Prolactinomas: A Single-Center Experience Over a 12-Year Period

Background:

Management of giant prolactinomas presents a different challenge than the management of traditional prolactinomas.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to report the largest long-term single-center study of giant prolactinomas to analyze their clinical features; define epidemiological characteristics, comorbidities, complications, treatment outcomes; and to demonstrate our experience with long-term cabergoline (CAB) treatment of these giant tumors.

Methods:

A retrospective case study and clinical review of patients presenting with giant prolactinomas in the pituitary clinic at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in the period between 2006 and 2018 were included in the study. Of the charts reviewed, 33 patients (24 men; 9 women) with age of diagnosis between 18 and 63 years (mean = 37.21 years) met the selection criteria for giant prolactinomas.

Result:

The most common presenting features include headache (87.8%), visual defects (69.7%), and hypogonadism (51.5%). The baseline means serum prolactin (PRL) level was extremely high for both sexes (95 615.03 nmol/L), which eventually decreased by as much as 95.4% after CAB treatment. Serum PRL concentrations completely normalized in 11 patients and significantly reduced in 22 patients. The mean tumor volume at baseline was 42.87 cm³, whereas the mean posttreatment tumor volume was 3.42 cm³ (no residual tumor in 2 patients, while in others, it ranged from 0.11 to 16.7 cm³) at the last follow-up visit. The mean change in tumor volume was 88.84%. Tumor volume decreased by an average of 92% for men and 80.4% for women. One patient had no tumor size change with CAB (3.5 mg thrice a week) or radiotherapy and required surgery. The response rate (remission after medical therapy alone) in this series was 84.84%.

Conclusions:

Findings reinforce results from our previous study that CAB provides dramatic clinical improvements with an excellent safety profile. The CAB should, therefore, be considered as the primary therapy for giant prolactinomas.

Aggressive pituitary tumors in the young and elderly

Aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) represent rare pituitary adenomas (PAs) with local invasion of surrounding tissues, increased risk for multiple recurrence, rapid tumor growth, or resistance to standard therapies. The most common APTs in children and adolescents are giant prolactinomas and somatotropinomas. Few cases of Crooke's cell adenomas, silent corticotroph adenomas and pituitary carcinomas have also been reported in the literature. Pediatric patients with APTs have higher risk of harboring germline genetic defects, most commonly in the MEN1 and AIP genes. Since certain genetic defects confer a more aggressive behavior to PAs, genetic testing should be considered in tumors with young onset and positive family history. The management of pediatric APTs involves usually a combination of standard therapies (surgical, medical, radiation). Newer agents, such as temozolomide, have been used in few cases of pediatric pituitary tumors with promising results. In the elderly, PAs are more commonly non-functioning. Their management often poses dilemmas given the coexistence of age-related comorbidities. However, standard surgical treatment and temozolomide seem to be safe and well tolerated in elderly patients.

How to Classify the Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET)s in 2020

Adenohypophyseal tumors, which were recently renamed pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), are mostly benign, but may present various behaviors: invasive, “aggressive” and malignant with metastases. They are classified into seven morphofunctional types and three lineages: lactotroph, somatotroph and thyrotroph (PIT1 lineage), corticotroph (TPIT lineage) or gonadotroph (SF1 lineage), null cell or immunonegative tumor and plurihormonal tumors. The WHO 2017 classification suggested that subtypes, such as male lactotroph, silent corticotroph and Crooke cell, sparsely granulated somatotroph, and silent plurihormonal PIT1 positive tumors, should be considered as “high risk” tumors. However, the prognostic impact of these subtypes and of each morphologic type remains controversial. In contrast, the French five-tiered classification, taking into account the invasion, the immuno-histochemical (IHC) type, and the proliferative markers (Ki-67 index, mitotic count, p53 positivity), has a prognostic value validated by statistical analysis in 4 independent cohorts. A standardized report for the diagnosis of pituitary tumors, integrating all these parameters, has been proposed by the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG). In 2020, the pituitary pathologist must be considered as a member of the multidisciplinary pituitary team. The pathological diagnosis may help the clinician to adapt the post-operative management, including appropriate follow-up and early recognition and treatment of potentially aggressive forms.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas; a review of the evidence

PURPOSE

This review aimed to evaluate data on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas.

METHODS

Recent literature about prolactinoma behavior and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas is reviewed.

RESULTS

A review of evidence regarding prolactinoma pituitary MRI follow-up; techniques and sequences, recent data on possible gadolinium retention, the role and a review of T2-weighted images in the identification of prolactinomas and frequently encountered clinical scenarios, as well as MRI correlation with prolactin secretion, tumor growth and prediction of response to medical therapy are presented.

CONCLUSION

The underlying decision to perform serial imaging in prolactinoma patients should be individualized on a case-by-case basis. Future studies should focus on alternative imaging methods and/or contract agents.

Giant Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma: Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Outcomes

Background Giant pituitary adenoma (≥4 cm) is a rare tumor whose clinical features and prognosis are not well known.

Aim To evaluate the clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of giant non-functioning PA (gNFPA).

Patients and Methods A retrospective multicenter study of gNFPA patients diagnosed in a 12-year period was performed. In each patient, clinical data and therapeutic outcomes were registered.

Results Forty patients (24 men, age 54.2 ± 16.2 years) were studied. The maximum tumor diameter [median (interquartile range)] was 4.6 cm (4.1–5.1). Women had larger tumors [4.8 cm (4.2–5.4) vs. 4.5 cm (4.0–4.9); p=0.048]. Hypopituitarism [partial (n=22, 55%) or complete (n=9, 22.5%)] at diagnosis was present in 77.5% of the patients. Visual field defects were found in 90.9%. The most used surgical technique was endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal (EET) surgery (n=31, 77.5%). Radiotherapy was used in 11 (27.5%) patients (median dose 50.4 Gy, range 50–54). Thirty-seven patients were followed for 36 months (10–67 months). Although more than half of these patients showed tumor persistence (n=25, 67.6%), tumor size was significantly reduced [0.8 cm (0–2.5); p<0.001]. At last visit, 12 patients (32.4%) showed absence of tumor on MRI. Hypopituitarism rate was similar (75.0%), although with significant changes (p<0.001) in the distribution of the type of hypopituitarism. The absence of tumor at the last visit was positively associated with positive immunohistochemical staining for FSH (p=0.01) and LH (p=0.006) and negatively with female sex (p=0.011), cavernous sinus invasion (p=0.005) and the presence of Knosp grade 4 (p=0.013).

Conclusion gNFPAs are more frequent in men but tumors are larger in women. Surgical treatment is followed by a complete tumor resection rate of approximately 30%. Positive immunostaining for gonadotropins is associated with tumor absence at last revision, while female sex and invasion of the cavernous sinuses with tumor persistence.

Clinical management of difficult to treat macroprolactinomas

INTRODUCTION

Prolactinomas represent the most common pituitary adenomas encountered in the clinic. While a majority of these tumors will be successfully treated by dopamine agonist (DA) such as cabergoline, their management becomes problematic since a resistance to DA can occur and/or if the tumor displays features of aggressiveness, two conditions that are closely related.

AREAS COVERED

Epidemiology and medical treatment of prolactinomas; resistance to DA and molecular basis of DA-resistance; therapeutical alternatives in case of DA-resistant Prolactinomas and therapies in development; summarizing conclusions.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of DA-resistant prolactinomas requires a multidisciplinary approach by an expert team. Along with discussions about surgery with or without gamma knife radiosurgery, genetic screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome is actively discussed in a case-by-case approach. In case of surgery, a careful analysis of the tumor sample can provide information about its aggressivity potential according to recent criteria. Ultimately, temozolomide can be indicated if the tumor is rapidly growing and/or threatening for the patient.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF GIANT PROLACTINOMA: A SERIES OF 71 PATIENTS

Objective: To describe outcomes of patients with giant prolactinoma (≥4 cm) and identify predictors of therapeutic response. Methods: In this retrospective study, complete biochemical and structural response were defined as prolactin (PRL) ≤25 ng/mL and no visible tumor at follow-up, respectively. Results: Giant prolactinoma (median size, 4.8 cm [range, 4 to 9.8 cm]; median PRL, 5,927 ng/mL [range, 120 to 100,000 ng/mL]) was diagnosed in 71 patients. Treatments included: dopamine agonists (DAs) (n = 70, 99%), surgery (n = 30, 42%), radiation (n = 10, 14%), and somatostatin analogs (n = 2, 3%). Patients treated with DA monotherapy were older compared with those who received subsequent therapies (47 years vs. 28 years; P = .003) but had similar initial PRL and tumor size. Surgically managed patients were younger compared with the nonsurgical group (35 years vs. 46 years; P = .02) and had lower initial PRL (3,121 ng/mL vs. 6,920 ng/mL; P = .02), yet they had similar tumor response. Hypopituitarism was more common following surgery compared to medical management: adrenal insufficiency (69% vs. 27%; P<.001), hypothyroidism (67% vs. 38%; P = .02), growth hormone deficiency (24% vs. 6%; P = .04), and diabetes insipidus (17% vs. 3%; P = .04). Therapeutic response did not correlate with sex, age, initial PRL, tumor size, or first-line therapy mode. At median follow-up of 4.8 years, the median PRL was 18.3 ng/mL (range, 0.6 to 12,680 ng/mL), and final volume was 0.9 cm³ (range, 0 to 43.0 cm³). In those with available data, 36/65 (55%) patients achieved PRL normalization, and 16/61 (26%) had no visible tumor at follow-up. Conclusion: Most patients with giant prolactinoma have excellent response to DA. Sex, age, initial PRL, and tumor size do not predict therapeutic response. Abbreviations: BRC = bromocriptine; CAB = cabergoline; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; DA = dopamine agonist; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PRL = prolactin.

Giant Prolactinoma Causing Hydrocephalus and Intracranial Hypertension as First Manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Context: Overall, giant prolactinomas are rare tumors (4%), especially those larger than 60 mm (1%). Despite the predominance of macroadenoma documented in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-related prolactinoma, only three giant prolactinoma cases were described so far (size > 40 mm and prolactin > 1,000 ng/mL). None of them was larger than 60 mm or presented hydrocephalus or intracranial hypertension (ICH) as initial manifestation of MEN1. Case Description: A 21-years-old man presented with ICH as the first clinical manifestation of MEN1. He harbored a MEN1 germline mutation but refused periodic vigilance after normal hormonal screening at age 14 years. During investigation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the skull showed an expansive sellar/parasellar lesion (75 × 44 × 36 mm) with moderate to severe supratentorial obstructive hydrocephalus and an extremely high serum prolactin (PRL) of 10,800 ng/mL, without combined hypersecretion of other pituitary hormones. He was diagnosed with giant prolactinoma, and cabergoline was initiated. The patient evolved with early improvement of clinical complaints for hydrocephalus and ICH and PRL reached normal values (11 ng/mL) in association with significant tumoral shrinkage after 18 months on cabergoline. After 2 months of cabergoline, cerebrospinal fluid leakage was diagnosed and corrective surgery was provided. The mean dose of cabergoline was 3 mg/week throughout treatment. Conclusion: We reported the first case with hydrocephalus and ICH as the initial clinical manifestation of a giant prolactinoma in MEN1. From our knowledge, this is the largest MEN1-related prolactinoma reported so far. Notably, all four MEN1-related giant prolactinomas cases reported were younger than 21 years strengthening the importance to routine MEN1 genetic testing for prolactinoma in this age group. Also, they all had initial effective response with dopamine agonist ensuring this drug as first-line treatment for MEN1-related giant prolactinoma. However, the scarce number of treated patients and progression of cabergoline resistance in two of them suggest strict surveillance.

Hyperprolactinemia/Prolactinomas in the Postmenopausal Period: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

Hyperprolactinemia is not a common finding in postmenopausal women. Prolactinomas detected after menopause are usually macroadenomas. Due to atypical clinical features they may remain unrecognized for a long period of time. Interestingly the growth potential of prolactinomas remains after menopause. Most tumors are invasive and present with high prolactin levels. They respond to medical treatment with dopamine agonists in terms of prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and improvement in pituitary function. Treatment with dopamine agonists is usually long term. Reducing doses of cabergoline to the lowest that keeps prolactin levels normal prior to withdrawal is proposed to patients with macroprolactinomas who normalize prolactin after > 5 years of treatment and who do not have cavernous sinus invasion. Cabergoline can achieve a high percentage of remission maintenance in the first years after withdrawal. However, the percentage of relapse-free patients 5 years after withdrawal is significantly lower. Besides recurrent hyper-prolactinemia in a subgroup of macroprolactinomas after a long-interval tumor regrowth may be detected. Menopause cannot ensure remission of the tumor so long-term surveillance is suggested. In patients with microadenomas data on long-term remission rates (normalization of prolactin and disappearance of the tumor) after suspension of treatment with dopamine agonists are highly variable. The current strategy for microprolactinomas is not to treat hyperprolactinemia in menopause if it recurrs after discontinuation of dopamine agonists. This is based on: (1) reports that elevated prolactin levels may normalize in some women after menopause, (2) the fact that the association between prolactin levels and breast cancer is inconsistent in postmenopausal women, (3) the lack of clinical evidence that normalization of prolactin levels in postmenopausal women improves bone mineral density or reduces the risk of fracture, and (4) the fact that, concerning the metabolic syndrome, no data are available on metabolic parameters after suspension of treatment with dopamine agonists. For a change in strategy, i.e., for the potential benefits from treatment of hyperprolactinemia in the postmenopausal period with dopamine agonists concerning weight loss, improved insulin sensitivity, decreased fracture risk, and improved sexuality, more evidence is needed.

Giant Prolactinomas

Prolactin-secreting adenomas (prolactinomas) are the most common secreting adenomas of the pituitary. Microprolactinomas (diameter <10 mm) are frequently diagnosed in women, whereas macroprolactinomas (maximum diameter ≥10 mm) are generally seen in men. Most macroprolactinomas measure between 10 and 40 mm. Giant prolactinomas, measuring >40 mm, are rare, accounting for only 1-5% of all prolactinomas. Although generally benign, giant prolactinomas are aggressive and invasive, extending into the suprasellar region and also involving the cavernous sinuses. The optic chiasm is frequently involved, which leads to visual damage, and patients occasionally suffer from ophthalmoplegia. Long-term (usually lifetime) therapy with high-dose dopamine agonists (cabergoline or bromocriptine), together with pituitary surgery in some cases and radiotherapy if required, can achieve biochemical remission, tumor control, and clinical improvement in most patients.

Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Factors of Aggressiveness in Lactotroph Tumours

The behaviour of lactotroph tumours varies between benign tumours, those cured by treatment, and that of aggressive tumours, and carcinomas with metastasis. Identification of clinical, pathological and molecular factors is essential for the early identification of patients that may have such aggressive tumours. Plasma prolactin levels and tumour size and invasion, per se, are not prognostic factors. However, tumours appearing at a young age (<20 years), especially in boys, and the presence of genetic predisposition have a poorer prognosis. In addition, lactotroph tumours in men differ from those in women, being larger, more often invasive, and resistant to dopamine agonists. They are also more often high-grade with a high risk of recurrence and malignancy. The expression of estrogen receptor α is lower than in women and is closely correlated to aggressiveness. Proliferation markers (Ki-67 expression: ≥3%, mitotic count n > 2) are correlated to invasion and proliferation, but, taken alone, their prognostic value is debatable. Based on a 5-tiered clinicopathological classification, and taking into account invasion and proliferation, a grade 2b (aggressive) lactotroph tumour has a 20× risk of progression compared to a grade 1a (benign) tumour. Moreover, lactotroph tumours are the second-most frequent aggressive and malignant tumour. Other factors, such as the expression of growth factors (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and epidermal growth factor [EGF]), the genes regulating invasion, differentiation and proliferation, adhesion molecules (E-cadherin), matrix metalloproteinase 9, and chromosome abnormalities (chromosomes 11, 19, and 1), have also been correlated with aggressiveness. Currently, clinical signs, a prognostic classification, and molecular and genetic markers may all help the clinician in the early identification of aggressive lactotroph tumours and enable stratification of their management.

Medically induced CSF rhinorrhea following treatment of macroprolactinoma: case series and literature review

PURPOSE

Although several reports have addressed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist (DA) therapy of macroprolactinomas, further study is warranted for this relatively uncommon entity. Toward this aim, our retrospective series and review of literature further clarifies recommendations in treatment of this rare problem.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all macroprolactinoma cases in our hospital for a 15-year period. Our systematic search of PubMed identified original articles and reviews of all macroprolactinoma cases with an associated medication-induced CSF leak.

RESULTS

Five patients with drug-induced CSF leak were identified; four of these patients received cabergoline therapy an average of 6 weeks before the onset of rhinorrhea and then underwent surgical repair of the CSF leak. Of 35 published studies included, we identified 60 patients with medication-induced CSF leak. Medical therapy included bromocriptine in 34 patients, cabergoline in 21 patients, and use of both DAs in two patients. Three cases did include complete diagnostic and treatment data. Median time from initiation of the DA treatment to occurrence of rhinorrhea was 6 weeks. For CSF rhinorrhea, 49 patients underwent surgical repair (38 by the transnasal approach) and seven patients were treated nonoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Baseline skull base erosion in macroprolactinomas in combination with subsequent tumor shrinkage induced by DA therapy may result in spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea. Therefore, such patients should be advised about and monitored for this potential setback. Once CSF leak is diagnosed, prompt treatment must be carried out to avoid infectious complications. Transnasal surgery appears the most effective therapeutic approach.

Is receptor profiling useful for predicting pituitary therapy?

Medical treatment of pituitary tumours may present important challenges in the presence of resistance to first line therapy. In this setting, the availability of specific markers of responsiveness/resistance could be helpful to provide tailored patients' treatment. Pituitary receptor profiling has emerged as a potentially useful tool for predicting the response to specific pituitary-directed medical therapy, mainly somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists. However, its utility is not always straightforward. In fact, agonist-receptor coupling to the consequent biological response is complex and sometimes jeopardizes the understanding of the molecular basis of pharmacological resistance. Defective expression of pituitary receptors, genetic alterations, truncated variants, impaired signal transduction or involvement of other proteins, such as cytoskeleton proteins or the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein amongst others, have been linked to differential tumour phenotype or treatment responsiveness with conflicting results, keeping the debate on the utility of pituitary receptor profiling open. Why does this occur? How can we overcome the difficulties? Is there a true role for pituitary receptor profiling in the near future? All authors of this debate article agree on the need of prospective studies using standardized methods in order to assess the efficacy of receptor profiling as a reliable clinical predictive factor.

Giant Prolactinoma of Young Onset: A Clue to Diagnosis of MEN-1 Syndrome

Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in MEN1 gene, characterized by tumours in endocrine and nonendocrine organs. Giant prolactinoma is defined as tumours larger than 40mm with very high prolactin secretion. We report two unrelated Sri Lankan patients (8-year-old boy and a 20-year-old female) who presented with giant prolactinomas with mass effects of the tumours. The female patient showed complete response to medical therapy, while the boy developed recurrent resistant prolactinoma needing surgery and radiotherapy. During follow-up, both developed pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Genetic analysis revealed that one was heterozygous for a nonsense mutation and other for missense mutation in MEN1 gene. Screening confirmed familial MEN-1 syndrome in their families. High clinical suspicion upon unusual clinical presentation prompted genetic evaluation in these patients and detection of MEN1 gene mutation. Pituitary adenomas in children with MEN-1 syndrome are larger tumours with higher rates of treatment resistance. This report emphasizes importance of screening young patients with giant prolactinoma for MEN-1 syndrome and arranging long-term follow-up for them expecting variable treatment outcomes. Sri Lanka requires further studies to describe the genotypic-phenotypic variability of MEN-1 syndrome in this population.

Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches

Giant pituitary adenomas comprise about 6-10% of all pituitary tumors. They are mostly clinically non-functioning adenomas and occur predominantly in males. The presenting symptoms are usually secondary to compression of neighboring structures, but also due to partial or total hypopituitarism. Functioning adenomas give rise to specific symptoms of hormonal hypersecretion. The use of dopamine agonists is considered a first-line treatment in patients with giant macroprolactinomas. Somatostatin analogs can also be used as primary treatment in cases of growth hormone and thyrotropin producing giant adenomas, although remission of the disease is not achieved in the vast majority of these patients. Neurosurgical treatment, either through transsphenoidal or transcranial surgery, continues to be the treatment of choice in the majority of patients with giant pituitary adenomas. The intrinsic complexity of these tumors requires the use of different therapies in a combined or sequential way. A multimodal approach and a therapeutic strategy involving a multidisciplinary team of expert professionals form the basis of the therapeutic success in these patients.

Controversial issues in the management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas - An overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenomas (approximately 40% of cases), and they represent an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility in both sexes. The magnitude of prolactin (PRL) elevation can be useful in determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia. Indeed, PRL levels > 250 ng/mL are highly suggestive of the presence of a prolactinoma. In contrast, most patients with stalk dysfunction, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia or systemic diseases present with PRL levels < 100 ng/mL. However, exceptions to these rules are not rare. On the other hand, among patients with macroprolactinomas (MACs), artificially low PRL levels may result from the so-called "hook effect". Patients harboring cystic MACs may also present with a mild PRL elevation. The screening for macroprolactin is mostly indicated for asymptomatic patients and those with apparent idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas, particularly cabergoline, which is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. After 2 years of successful treatment, DA withdrawal should be considered in all cases of microprolactinomas and in selected cases of MACs. In this publication, the goal of the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) is to provide a review of the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas, emphasizing controversial issues regarding these topics. This review is based on data published in the literature and the authors' experience.

Cabergoline versus bromocriptine for the treatment of giant prolactinomas: A quantitative and systematic review

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of bromocriptine (BRC) versus cabergoline (CAB) in patients with giant prolactinomas. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Clinical Trials.gov for studies dated before March 1st, 2016, that used BRC or CAB for the treatment of patients with giant prolactinomas. Specific eligibility criteria were set to identify articles and cases. The selected articles were reviewed, and the data were extracted for analysis. The compared outcomes included tumor shrinkage, tumor response, normalization of prolactin (PRL) level, and visual field defect (VFD) improvement. Gender differences were also considered. Differences between the groups were assessed using Student's t test and the chi-square test. Two hundred and forty-five records were identified, and 10 articles and 104 cases met the inclusion criteria. Based on our analysis, CAB is significantly better than BRC in normalizing PRL levels in patients, especially males, with giant prolactinomas (69.4% versus 31.7%, p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of tumor shrinkage, tumor response and VFD improvement (p > 0.05) in male or female patients. CAB exhibits significantly better efficacy than BRC in the normalization of PRL levels in male patients with giant prolactinomas. Regarding tumor reduction and VFD improvement, both drugs are comparably effective for patients of both genders. This quantitative and systematic review provides preliminary evidence in favor of CAB as a medical therapy for treating giant prolactinomas in male patients, especially those with extremely high PRL levels.

European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Pituitary tumours are common and easily treated by surgery or medical treatment in most cases. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours does not respond to standard medical treatment and presents with multiple local recurrences (aggressive pituitary tumours) and in rare occasion with metastases (pituitary carcinoma). The present European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) guideline aims to provide clinical guidance on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.

METHODS

We decided upfront, while acknowledging that literature on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas is scarce, to systematically review the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The review focused primarily on first- and second-line treatment in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. We included 14 single-arm cohort studies (total number of patients = 116) most on temozolomide treatment (n = 11 studies, total number of patients = 106). A positive treatment effect was seen in 47% (95% CI: 36-58%) of temozolomide treated. Data from the recently performed ESE survey on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas (165 patients) were also used as backbone for the guideline. SELECTED RECOMMENDATION: (i) Patients with aggressive pituitary tumours should be managed by a multidisciplinary expert team. (ii) Histopathological analyses including pituitary hormones and proliferative markers are needed for correct tumour classification. (iii) Temozolomide monotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas after failure of standard therapies; treatment evaluation after 3 cycles allows identification of responder and non-responder patients. (iv) In patients responding to first-line temozolomide, we suggest continuing treatment for at least 6 months in total. Furthermore, the guideline offers recommendations for patients who recurred after temozolomide treatment, for those who did not respond to temozolomide and for patients with systemic metastasis.

Prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period: Clinical phenotype and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Most prolactinomas in females are diagnosed during the reproductive age, and the majority are microadenomas. Prolactinomas detected in the postmenopausal period are less common with limited published data on their presentation and prognosis. Our objective was to assess the presenting clinical, biochemical and imaging findings, as well as the outcomes of women diagnosed with a prolactinoma in the postmenopausal period.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We undertook a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with prolactinoma after menopause and followed up in a large UK pituitary centre. Information on presentation, management and outcomes was collected.

RESULTS

Seventeen women with a median age at diagnosis of 63 years (range 52-78) were identified. Headaches and/or visual deterioration were the most commonly reported complaints at detection of the adenoma (47%). Acute pituitary apoplexy was diagnosed at presentation or during follow-up in 18% of the cases. The median serum prolactin was 12 364 mU/L (range 2533-238 479). Macroprolactinomas comprised 94% of the tumours, and 88% of them had supra/parasellar extension. All patients with macroprolactinoma were offered dopamine agonist, and normal prolactin was achieved in 94% of them (median follow-up 91.5 months). Adenoma shrinkage was observed in all women. Improvement or resolution of visual disturbances documented at presentation was observed in 86% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical phenotype of prolactinomas diagnosed in the postmenopausal period is characterized by dominance of macroadenomas, with frequent supra/parasellar extension and a relative high rate of acute pituitary apoplexy. In this group of patients, the response of the macroadenomas to dopamine agonists is good.

Long-term outcome of multimodal therapy for giant prolactinomas

Giant prolactinomas are rare tumors characterized by their large size, compressive symptoms, and extremely high prolactin secretion. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with a series of 16 giant prolactinomas cases in terms of clinical presentation, therapeutic decisions, and final outcomes. Retrospective analysis of adult patients diagnosed with giant prolactinomas at the endocrine departments of three university tertiary hospitals. We included 16 patients (43.7 % women); mean age at diagnosis: 42.1 ± 21 years. The most frequent presentation was compressive symptoms. The delay in diagnosis was higher in women (median of 150 months vs. 12 in men; p = 0.09). The mean maximum tumor diameter at diagnosis was 56.9 ± 15.5 mm, and mean prolactin levels were 10,995.9 ± 12,157.8 ng/mL. Dopamine agonists were the first-line treatment in 11 patients (mean maximum dose: 3.9 ± 3.2 mg/week). Surgery was the initial treatment in five patients and the second-line treatment in six. Radiotherapy was used in four cases. All patients but one, are still with dopamine agonists. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, prolactin normalized in 7/16 patients (43.7 %) and 13 patients (81 %) reached prolactin levels lower than twice the upper limit of normal. Mean prolactin level at last visit: 79.5 ± 143 ng/mL. Tumor volume was decreased by 93.8 ± 11.3 %, and final maximum tumor diameter was 18.4 ± 18.8 mm. Three patients are actually tumor free. Giant prolactinomas are characterized by a large tumor volume and extreme prolactin hypersecretion. Multimodal treatment is frequently required to obtain biochemical and tumor control.

Epidemiology and radiological geometric assessment of pituitary macroadenomas: population-based study

CONTEXT

Pituitary adenomas are relatively common tumours with diverse clinical features. Epidemiological data are important to help quantify health burden.

OBJECTIVE

To provide in-depth epidemiological data on macroadenomas and radiologically characterize macroadenomas.

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective analysis, Prevalence as at 2014; Incidence based on data from 2000 to 2014, Retrospective analysis of baseline MRI.

SETTING

The Maltese islands.

PATIENTS

173/136 patients with macroadenomas for prevalence/incidence estimates respectively, 122 baseline MRI for radiological characterization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence rates, Standardized Incidence rates (SIR), MRI findings.

RESULTS

The prevalence for macroadenomas was 40·67/100 000 people and the SIR was 1·90/100 000/year. Giant pituitary adenomas (>40 mm) constituted 4·8% of the whole cohort of PAs and the SIR was 0·18/100 000/year. Giant prolactinomas constituted 4·7% of all the prolactinomas and the SIR was 0·07/100 000/year, while giant NFPA constituted 6·0% of all NFPA and the SIR was 0·12/100 000/year. There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of suprasellar extension (P < 0·001) and infrasellar extension (P = 0·028) between the different macroadenoma subtypes and in the vertical extension indices (median vertical extension index NFPA 3·0 mm; PRLoma -7·7 mm; GH-secreting PA -1·7 mm; P < 0·001). Pituitary macroadenomas with cavernous sinus invasion were statistically significantly larger than those without cavernous sinus invasion (P < 0·001). NFPA had predominantly a superior extension into the cavernous sinus (63·6%) compared to the functional PAs which had predominantly an inferior extension into the cavernous sinus (59·1%) (P = 0·032).

CONCLUSIONS

The various macroadenoma subtypes' epidemiological data are presented and differences between growth patterns among the various subtypes are highlighted.

Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVES

Prolactin (PRL)-secreting macroadenomas usually measure between 10 and 40 mm. Giant (adenoma size ≥40 mm) PRL-tumors are not common, and larger prolactinomas (maximal diameter ≥60 mm) are rare, and their management outcomes have not been well characterized.

METHODS

We have identified 18 subjects (16 men, 2 females) with giant PRL-adenomas (size ≥60 mm; PRL > 1000 ng/ml) and summarized their characteristics and response to treatment.

RESULTS

Mean age was 36.3 ± 13.5 years (range 12-59 years). Mean adenoma size was 71.8 ± 10.2 mm (60-92 mm). Complaints at presentation included headaches in 11 patients, visual deterioration in 9, sexual dysfunction in 9 males, and behavioral changes in two. Fourteen (78 %) had visual field defects. Mean PRL at presentation was 28,465 ng/ml (range 1300-270,000). All patients were treated with cabergoline (3.9 ± 2.0 mg/week), except for one who received bromocriptine. Treatment achieved PRL normalization in 11/18 patients within a median interval of 20 months. Visual improvement occurred in 12/14 patients with pre-treatment visual abnormalities. Nine patients underwent surgery (transsphenoidal, 7; transcranial, 2). None of the seven patients with elevated PRL before surgery achieved remission post-operatively. After a follow-up of 7.8 ± 5.1 years, 15/18 patients had significant adenoma shrinkage. Eleven patients are normoprolactinemic, 3 are partially controlled (PRL < 3 × ULN), and 4 remain with significantly elevated PRL. Most patients reported disappearance or improvement of their complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

These enormous PRL-adenomas are invasive but respond fairly well to medical treatment. Long-term therapy with high dose cabergoline together with a pituitary surgery in some patients was the key for their successful management, achieving biochemical and clinical remission in most patients.

Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas?

Giant prolactinomas (gPRLomas) are rare tumors of the lactotroph defined by an unusually large size (>4 cm) and serum PRL levels >1000 ng/mL. The purpose of this study is to characterize the clinical spectrum of gPRLomas comparing them with non-giant prolactinomas. This is a retrospective study at a large referral center. Data from patients harboring gPRLomas and macroprolactinomas were retrieved from medical records of the Prolactinoma Clinic. Analysis was focused on clinical, biochemical, and tumor volume characteristics, as well as on the response to treatment with dopamine agonists. Among 292 patients with prolactinomas followed between 2008 and 2015, 47 (16 %) met the diagnostic criteria for gPRLomas (42 males). The most common complaint was a visual field defect; headache was reported by 79 % and sexual dysfunction was present in over half of the patients. Median basal PRL level and tumor volume were 6667 ng/mL (3750-10,000) and 32 cm(3) (20-50), respectively; hypogonadotropic hypogonadism was documented in 87 %. Cabergoline treatment resulted in the normalization of PRL levels in 68 % and in the reduction of >50 % in tumor volume in 87 % of the gPRLoma patients. The composite goal of PRL normalization and >50 % tumor reduction was achieved by 55 % (n = 26) of patients with gPRL and by 66 % (n = 100) of patients with no giant macroprolactinomas (p = 0.19). Recovery of hypogonadism and improvement of visual fields defects occurred in 32 % and 68 % of the patients, respectively. Cabergoline treatment was equally effective in patients with gPRLoma and those with macroprolactinomas in regard of achieving treatment goals, although the median CBG dose was slightly higher in the gPRLoma group (2 vs. 1.5 mg/w). Six patients required surgery. Beyond their impressive dimensions and the huge amount of PRL they secrete, the clinical behavior of gPRLoma is not different from macroprolactinomas. These tumors are highly responsive to cabergoline treatment, and pituitary surgery is seldom required.

Gender differences in macroprolactinomas: a single centre experience

Macroprolactinomas are the most common functional pituitary tumours. Hypotheses proposed to explain predominance of large tumours in males are: i) diagnostic delay, as hyperprolactinaemia remains under recognised in males and ii) gender-specific difference in tumour proliferation indices. Our study objectives are to compare gender differences in clinical, biochemical, radiological features, management outcomes and cabergoline responsiveness in macroprolactinomas. Drug resistance was defined as failure to achieve prolactin normalisation and >50% reduction in tumour volume with cabergoline (3.5 mg/week dose for minimum 6 months duration). The baseline characteristics of 100 patients (56 females and 44 males) with macroprolactinoma were analysed. Drug responsiveness was analysed in 88 treatment naive patients, excluding 12 post-primary trans-sphenoidal surgery cases. We found that females (30.29±10.39 years) presented at younger mean age than males (35.23±9.91 years) (P<0.01). The most common presenting symptom was hypogonadism (oligo-amenorrhoea/infertility) in females (96.15%) and symptoms of mass effect (headache and visual field defects) in males (93.18%). Baseline mean prolactin levels were significantly lower in females (3094.36±6863.01 ng/ml) than males (7927.07±16 748.1 ng/ml) (P<0.001). Maximal tumour dimension in females (2.49±1.48 cm) was smaller than males (3.93±1.53 cm) (P<0.001). In 88 treatment naïve patients, 27.77% females and 35.29% males had resistant tumours (P=0.48). On subgrouping as per maximum tumour dimension (1.1-2 cm, 2.1-4 cm and >4 cm), gender difference in response rate was insignificant. In conclusion, macroprolactinomas are equally prevalent in both sexes. Macroprolactinomas in males predominantly present with symptoms of mass effects, as against females who present with symptoms of hypogonadism. Males harbor larger tumours but are equally cabergoline responsive as those in females.

Management of macroprolactinomas

Prolactin (PRL) secreting tumors are the most common functional neoplasms of the pituitary and are commonly subdivided into microprolactinomas (<10 mm) and macroprolactinomas (≥10 mm) according to their baseline diameter. Patients with prolactinoma present with symptoms evolving from hyperprolactinemia and with those caused by pressure of the expanding mass on surrounding tissues, including the optic chiasm and the cavernous sinuses. We hereby describe the possible complications of macroprolactinomas, including mass effects, hypopituitarism, CSF leak and apoplexy and discuss their relevant management.

In general, all patients harboring macroprolactinomas should be treated, the objectives being to achieve normal or near normal PRL levels, to reduce or stabilize adenoma size and to recover altered pituitary axes. Medical therapy with dopamine agonists (DA) is the preferred initial treatment for the vast majority of patients harboring prolactinomas. Pituitary surgery is indicated in patients who cannot tolerate or are resistant to therapy with DAs, patients that seek fertility and harbor adenomas that impinge on the optic chiasm, psychiatric patients with contraindication to DA treatment and patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy or a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. In addition, in this review, several patient populations with unique clinical characteristics will be discussed separately namely postmenopausal women, the elderly, children and patients with pituitary carcinoma.

Expression of estrogen receptor alpha is associated with prolactin pituitary tumor prognosis and supports the sex-related difference in tumor growth

CONTEXT

A sex difference in the progression of prolactin (PRL) tumors has been disputed for years.

OBJECTIVE

To compare tumor characteristics and postoperative clinical course between men and women, and correlate data with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα (ESR1)) expression status.

DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients (59 women and 30 men) operated on for a prolactinoma and followed for at least 5 years were selected. Tumors were classified into five grades according to their size, invasion, and proliferation characteristics. The ERα expression was detected by immunohistochemistry and a score (0-12) calculated as the product of the percentage of positive nuclei and the staining intensity.

RESULTS

We found a significant preponderance of high-grade tumors among men and a lower surgical cure rate in men (23%) than in women (71%). Patients resistant to medical treatment were mainly men (7/8), six of whom showed tumor progression despite postoperative medical treatment, which led to multiple therapies and eventually death in three. The median score for ERα expression was 1 in men (range, 0-8) and 8 in women (range, 0-12) (P<0.0001). The expression of ERα was inversely correlated with tumor size (r=-0.59; P<0.0001) and proliferative activity. All dopamine agonist-resistant tumors and all grade 2b (invasive and proliferative) tumors (from ten men and four women) were characterized by low ERα expression.

CONCLUSIONS

PRL tumors in men are characterized by lower ERα expression, which is related to higher tumor grades, resistance to treatment, and an overall worse prognosis.

Neurological, psychiatric, ophthalmological, and endocrine complications in giant male prolactinomas: An observational study in Algerian population

INTRODUCTION

Prolactinomas are less frequent, but more invasive in males. Giant ones (≥4 cm) are extremely rare in literature. Their neurological, psychiatric and endocrine complications are life threatening. Our aim was to report the largest mono center series in order to analyze their frequency, their characteristics, and their complications.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All patients had clinical examination, hormonal, ophthalmological, and radiological assessment based on computed tomography scan and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. Positive diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, high prolactin ± immunohistochemy study. Mixed adenomas were excluded by hormonal exploration and immunohistochemy. For those who received medical treatment only, a reduction in tumor size was considered a supplementary positive point for the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 154 male prolactinomas seen between 1987 and 2013, we observed 44 giant tumors (28.5%). Median age = 36 years, and 38.3% were under 30. Median tumor height = 53.95 mm (40-130) and median prolactin = 15,715 ng/ml (n < 20). Solid and cystic aspect ± calcifications was observed in 25%. 42 had cavernous sinuses invasion. Other invasions were: Posterior= 65.9%, anterior= 63.6%, temporal= 15.9% and frontal = 9%. For endocrine complications: Hypogonadism = 98.4%, thyrotroph and corticotroph deficits were seen in respectively 34%, and 32%. Posterior pituitary insufficiency was observed in one case. For ophthalmological complications: Optic atrophy = 46%, Ptosis = 6.8%, diplopia/strabismus = 4.5%. Neurological complications were: Memory loss and/or unconsciousness = 18.2%, epilepsy = 15.9%, frontal syndrome = 9% and obstructive hydrocephalus = 6.8%.

CONCLUSION

Giant prolactinomas account for 28% in our population. Severe neurological complications are frequent. But, obstructive hydrocephalus is rare, which argues for a slow progression.

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia in post-menopausal women: pros

The incidence of hyperprolactinemia in women peaks during the 3rd-4th decade and then greatly decreases after the menopause. Apart from the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, prolactin can act directly on bone metabolism. Hyperprolactinemia is a recognized cause of secondary osteoporosis, and treatment with dopamine agonists can lead to improved BMD. Moreover, hyperprolactinemia has been linked to weight gain and insulin resistance, which can be ameliorated following medical treatment. Although relatively rare, prolactinomas can be observed in post-menopausal women and are frequently large and invasive; dopamine agonists appear to be as effective in these patients as in younger women to induce reduction of prolactin levels and tumour shrinkage. Here, we review data potentially favouring medical treatment with dopamine agonists in post-menopausal women diagnosed with hyperprolactinemia.

Women with prolactinomas presented at the postmenopausal period

In women, prolactinomas (mainly microprolactinomas) are commonly diagnosed between 20-40-year old. In postmenopausal women, prolactinomas are rarely encountered and usually do not present with hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms as these are dependent on intact ovarian function. Therefore, the true incidence of prolactin (PRL)-secreting adenomas in postmenopausal woman is unknown. Our study objective was to characterize these rare and unique pituitary tumors. A retrospective study including a consecutive group of postmenopausal women followed and treated at 3 Endocrine academic clinics. Baseline clinical characteristics (PRL and gonadotropins levels, other pituitary hormones, adenoma size and invasiveness, visual fields) and response to treatment are reported. The cohort included 14 postmenopausal women with prolactinomas (mean age at diagnosis, 63.6 ± 7.1 years; range, 54-75 years). Mean adenoma size at presentation was 25.6 ± 12.4 mm (range, 8-50 mm). Six out of the 14 women had significant visual fields damage. Mean baseline PRL level was 1,783 ng/ml, and median PRL was 827 ng/ml (range, 85-6,732 ng/ml). Medical treatment with cabergoline was given to twelve of the patients. Cabergoline normalized/near-normalized PRL in eleven women; one woman was dopamine agonist-resistant. Five of the six subjects with visual disturbances normalized or improved their vision, and a pre-treatment diplopia in another patient disappeared. Two large pituitary tumors disappeared on MRI following long-term dopamine agonist therapy. All other treated prolactinomas, except the resistant adenoma, shrank following medical treatment. Prolactinomas are rarely diagnosed in postmenopausal women. These women usually harbor large and invasive macroadenomas, secreting high PRL levels, and usually respond to dopamine agonist treatment.

Therapy of endocrine disease: the challenges in managing giant prolactinomas

Giant prolactinomas are rare tumours, representing only 2-3% of all prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumours and raising special diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Based on several considerations developed in this review, their definition should be restricted to pituitary adenomas with a diameter of 40  mm or more, significant extrasellar extension, very high PRL concentrations (usually above 1000  μg/l) and no concomitant GH or ACTH secretion. Giant prolactinomas are much more frequent in young to middle-aged men than in women, with a male to female ratio of about 9:1. Endocrine symptoms are often present but overlooked for a long period of time, and diagnosis is eventually made when neurologic complications arise from massive extension into the surrounding structures, leading to cranial nerve palsies, hydrocephalus, temporal epilepsy or exophthalmos. PRL concentrations are usually in the range of 1000-100,000  μg/l, but may be underestimated by the so-called 'high-dose hook effect'. As in every prolactinoma, dopamine agonists are the first-line treatment allowing rapid alleviation of neurologic symptoms in the majority of the cases, a significant reduction in tumour size in three-fourths of the patients and PRL normalization in 60-70%. These extensive tumours are usually not completely resectable and neurosurgery has significant morbidity and mortality. It should therefore be restricted to acute complications such as apoplexy or leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (often induced by medical treatment) or to patients with insufficient tumoural response or progression. Irradiation and temozolomide are useful adjuvant therapies in a subset of patients with aggressive/invasive tumours, which are not controlled despite combined medical and surgical treatments. Because of these various challenges, we advocate a multidisciplinary management of these giant tumours in expert centres.