Effect of corticotrophin-releasing hormone administration on growth hormone levels in acromegaly: in vivo and in vitro studies

Clinical Characteristics of Acromegalic Patients With Paradoxical GH Response to Oral Glucose Load

CONTEXT

A paradoxical GH response to oral glucose (OG) is often found in acromegaly. However, the clinical characteristics of patients with acromegaly and a paradoxical GH response to OG (OG responders) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to define the clinical characteristics of OG responders with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Hospitalized care at Osaka University Hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 63 patients with acromegaly admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to January 2017, 19 were classified as OG responders and 44 as nonresponders. The clinical characteristics of these groups were compared.

RESULTS

Before surgery, OG responders had substantially greater IGF-1 SD scores than nonresponders (P < 0.05), although no difference was found in basal GH levels between the two groups (P = 0.46). Regarding glucose metabolism, 120-minute plasma glucose and immunoreactive insulin after OG administration and hemoglobin A1c were significantly greater in OG responders than in nonresponders (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively). GH levels during octreotide or bromocriptine testing were decreased more significantly in OG responders than in nonresponders (P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively). The proportion of pituitary tumors with hypointensity on T2-weighted MRI was significantly greater in OG responders than in nonresponders (P < 0.05). The difference in IGF-1 and parameters of glucose metabolism described disappeared between the two groups after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The paradoxical GH response reflected the clinical characteristics, especially IGF-I level, glucose metabolism, and drug efficacy in acromegaly. A paradoxical GH response, in addition to the nadir GH levels, to OG load is potentially useful for evaluation of the clinical characteristics of acromegaly.

Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly

In the vast majority of cases, basal serum GH and IGF-1 levels are markedly increased in patients with obvious clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is useful for diagnosis in the minority of patients who have weak GH hypersecretion. The cutoff for a "normal" GH nadir in the OGTT remains to be agreed. The type of GH assay, its sensitivity, the type of standard used by the manufacturer, the patient's age and especially gender, must all be taken into account. Recent studies using new highly sensitive assays suggest an upper normal GH nadir of 0.71 microg/l for female healthy patients, but no "universal" cut-off has yet been defined for healthy males (from 0.057 to 0.25 microg/l). The 1 microg/l cutoff proposed for the diagnosis of acromegaly in a 2000 consensus should be abandoned in favor of a 0.30 microg/l cutoff. Clinicians should know which assay is used, together with its sensitivity and the standard, before making therapeutic decisions. A more pragmatic view should probably be adopted when assessing the treatment response. Indeed, if "cure" is defined not with the <1 microg/l GH nadir but on the basis of healthy control values, many patients will not be considered controlled. However, the clinical relevance of such goal (e.g. achieving GH nadir <0.4 microg/l rather than <1 microg/l) in terms of prognosis and prediction of outcome on long term is not firmly established. Thus, from a pragmatic point of view, achieving a normal age-adjusted IGF-1 level and a GH nadir below 1 microg/l during OGTT will probably remain relevant for defining remission and good disease control in terms of morbidity and mortality in acromegaly.

In vivo and in vitro effects of octreotide, quinagolide and cabergoline in four hyperprolactinaemic acromegalics: correlation with somatostatin and dopamine D2 receptor scintigraphy

OBJECTIVE

GH and PRL cosecretion frequently occurs in acromegaly and the sensitivity of both hormones to somatostatin analogs (SA) and dopamine agonists (DA) alone or in combination, is still debated. This study was designed to evaluate the in vivo and in vitro sensitivity to SA and/or DA and correlate the response in terms of hormone suppression to the results of in vivo somatostatin and dopamine receptor scintigraphy and to the immunohistochemical findings.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Scintigraphy using 111In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT (111In-OCT) and 123I-methoxybenzamide (123I-IBZM) was performed in four patients with acromegaly and high circulating GH, PRL and IGF-I levels. The results were correlated with the response to long-term treatment with octreotide (OCT), quinagolide (QN) and/or cabergoline (CAB), to the in vitro hormone suppression by OCT and DA in primary cultures from the pituitary tumors and to the immunohistochemical findings.

RESULTS

The first patient showed high tumour uptake of 111In-OCT and 123I-IBZM, the second high uptake of only 111In-OCT, while the third one showed faint tumour uptake of only 123I-IBZM, and the fourth a faint uptake of 111In-OCT. In the first and in the fourth patients OCT or CAB administered alone failed to normalize hormone levels while the combined treatment induced circulating GH, IGF-I and PRL normalization. In the second patient OCT administered alone normalized hormone levels while QN reduced PRL levels only. In the third patient both OCT and QN, alone or in combination, failed to normalize hormone levels. However, in this patient GH and PRL suppression was significantly greater after QN than OCT treatment. After medical therapy, all the patients were operated on. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse GH and focal PRL staining in the first patient, while diffuse GH and PRL staining in the remaining three. In vitro, OCT significantly suppressed GH secretion in the four primary pituitary tumor cultures, while PRL secretion was significantly suppressed only in the second and the fourth cases. Dopamine agonists (DA) significantly suppressed PRL release in all the cultures, while GH secretion was significantly suppressed in three out of four.

CONCLUSIONS

These four acromegalics, presenting similar clinical findings and comparable peripheral hormone levels, showed different responsiveness to SA and DA. Moreover, during the in vitro study on primary tumor cell cultures, OCT and DA displayed an inhibiting activity on GH and PRL secretion positively correlated with the response observed in vivo. This evidence together with the in vivo receptor imaging study suggest the existence of somatostatin and/or dopamine D2 receptor heterogeneity in this class of pituitary tumors. The new potent DA might be primarily considered in the medical treatment of hyperprolactinemic acromegalics, while SA alone or in combination with DA in case of ineffective hormone suppression.

Absence of mutations in the growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone receptor gene in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a potent stimulator of somatotroph cell proliferation and GH secretion. GHRH acts via binding to a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) (GHRH-R), that activates adenylyl cyclase (AC) and increases growth and function of somatotroph cells. Indeed, a subset (30--40%) of somatotrophic adenomas contain somatic mutations of the GNAS1 gene that encodes the alpha subunit of the G-protein (G(s)alpha) that stimulates AC. As activating mutations of other GPCRs cause development of endocrine tumours, we hypothesized that somatic activating mutations of the GHRH-R might provide the molecular basis for somatotroph cell proliferation in a subset of human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

DESIGN

We analysed genomic DNA isolated from 26 somatotrophinomas, 17 of which lacked activating mutations in the GNAS1 gene. We individually amplified via polymerase chain reaction all 13 coding exons and the exon-intron boundaries of the GHRH-R gene. We used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to search for abnormalities in exons 1 through 11. Abnormally migrating bands were subjected to direct sequencing. Exons 12 and 13, encoding for the intracellular C-terminal domain, were subjected to direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Mutations were not detected in any of the tumours, but a rare polymorphism in codon 225 corresponding to the third transmembrane domain (V225I) was discovered.

CONCLUSIONS

GHRH-R mutations are absent or rare in somatotrophinomas, and other mechanisms must explain the somatotroph cell proliferation in the adenomas that lack activating mutations in the GNAS1 gene.

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with acromegaly

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity was measured in nine acromegalic patients (age, 35 +/- 4 yr; body mass index, 28 +/- 2 kg/m2) and eight healthy subjects (age, 32 +/- 3 yr; body mass index, 25 +/- 2 kg/m2) by combining the forearm arterial-venous difference technique with the tracer method [infusion of tritiated norepinephrine (NE)]. Muscle NE release was quantified both at rest and during physiological hyperinsulinemia while maintaining euglycemia (approximately 90 mg/dL) by means of the euglycemic clamp. Arterial plasma NE was similar in the two groups at rest (197 +/- 28 and 200 +/- 27 pg/mL (-1) and slightly increased during insulin infusion. Forearm NE release was 2.33 +/- 0.55 ng x liter(-1) x min(-1) in healthy subjects and 2.67 +/- 0.61 ng x liter(-1) x min(-1) in acromegalic subjects in the basal state and increased to a similar extent during insulin infusion in both groups (3.13 +/- 0.71 and 3.32 +/- 0.75 ng x L(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.05 vs. basal), indicating a normal stimulatory effect of insulin on muscle sympathetic activity. In contrast, insulin-stimulated forearm glucose uptake was markedly lower in acromegalic patients (2.3 +/- 0.4 mg x L(-1) x min(-1)) than in control subjects (7.9 +/- 1.3 mg x L(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.001), indicating the presence of severe insulin resistance involving glucose metabolism. Our data demonstrate that patients with long-term acromegaly have normal sympathetic activity in the skeletal muscle in the basal, postabsorptive state and normal increments in NE spillover in response to the sympatho-excitatory effect of insulin. Thus, the presence of severe insulin resistance in acromegaly is not accounted for by adrenergic mechanisms.