1
|
Mohindroo C, McAllister F, De Jesus-Acosta A. Genetics of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:1033-1051. [PMID: 36154786 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) represent a relatively rare disease; however, the incidence has been increasing during the last 2 decades. Next generation sequencing has greatly increased our understanding of driver mutations in pNETs. Sporadic pNETs have consistently presented with mutations in MEN1, DAXX/ATRX, and genes related to the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Inherited pNETs have traditionally been associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1, and tuberous sclerosis complex. The current review expands on the existing knowledge and the relevant updates on the genetics of pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirayu Mohindroo
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1360, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2435 W. Belvedere Ave, Ste 56, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA
| | - Florencia McAllister
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1360, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana De Jesus-Acosta
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, CRB1, 1650 Orleans Street, CRB1 Rm 409, Baltimore, MD 21287.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Modica R, Liccardi A, Minotta R, Cannavale G, Benevento E, Colao A. Therapeutic strategies for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: current perspectives. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2022; 17:389-403. [PMID: 35822906 DOI: 10.1080/17446651.2022.2099840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies mainly arising in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary systems, with steadily increasing incidence. The therapeutic landscape has widened and the therapeutic strategy should be based on new sequences and combinations, still debated. AREAS COVERED Herein, we provide an overview of current approved pharmacological treatments in patients with NENs, with the aim to summarize evidence of efficacy of the main different options in GEP and pulmonary NENs, principally focusing on somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapy with everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and chemotherapy. We discuss biological rationale and toxicities, including current indications according to differentiation and placement in the therapeutic algorithm, clinical trials, and combinations. Furthermore, we recommend areas for further research. EXPERT OPINION Therapeutic management of patients with NENs represents a challenge for clinicians and the identification of effective sequences and combinations is of utmost importance. Major efforts should be directed to early identify and overcome resistance and to limit toxicity. The progress in the therapeutic management of NENs grows faster and the choice of the best approach should be based on randomized clinical trials, as well as on long-term, real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Modica
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Liccardi
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Minotta
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cannavale
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Elio Benevento
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Endocrinology, Diabetology and Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- UNESCO Chair, Education for Health and Sustainable Development, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
La néoplasie endocrinienne multiple de type 1 : mise au point après le congrès de l’ENETS 2019. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2020; 80 Suppl 1:S19-S28. [PMID: 31606058 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4266(19)30113-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (NEM1) is related to mutations of the menin gene. It is an autosomal dominant disease. Its prevalence is about 1/30 000 with a hugh penetrance. There is no genotype-phenotype correlation. This hereditary syndrome is characterized by the presence of tumors of the endocrine system (parathyroid, endocrine pancreas, pituitary and adrenal gland). Other disorders have also been described (bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumor, breast cancer, skin lesions). Management must take into account the specificities of these pathologies in NEM1 compared to sporadic forms (young age at diagnosis, multiple lesions within the same gland, multi-focal disease). © 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Les Must de l'Endocrinologie 2019 réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Ipsen-Pharma.
Collapse
|
4
|
Zanini S, Renzi S, Giovinazzo F, Bermano G. mTOR Pathway in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (GEP-NETs). Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:562505. [PMID: 33304317 PMCID: PMC7701056 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.562505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) originate from neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract. They are heterogeneous, and though initially considered rare tumors, the incidence of GEP-NENs has increased in the last few decades. Therapeutic approaches for the metastatic disease include surgery, radiological intervention by chemoembolisation, radiofrequency ablation, biological therapy in addition to somatostatin analogs, and PRRT therapy (177Lu-DOTATATE). The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is essential in the regulation of protein translation, cell growth, and metabolism. Evidence suggests that the mTOR pathway is involved in malignant progression and resistance to treatment through over-activation of several mechanisms. PI3K, one of the main downstream of the Akt-mTOR axis, is mainly involved in the neoplastic process. This pathway is frequently deregulated in human tumors, making it a central target in the development of new anti-cancer treatments. Recent molecular studies identify potential targets within the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in GEP-NENs. However, the use of target therapy has been known to lead to resistance due to several mechanisms such as feedback activation of alternative pathways, inactivation of protein kinases, and deregulation of the downstream mTOR components. Therefore, the specific role of targeted drugs for the management of GEP-NENs is yet to be well-defined. The variable clinical presentation of advanced neuroendocrine tumors is a significant challenge for designing studies. This review aims to highlight the role of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in the development of neuroendocrine tumors and further specify its potential as a therapeutic target in advanced stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Zanini
- Centre for Obesity Research and Education (CORE), School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Serena Renzi
- School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Department of Surgery -Transplantation Service, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Francesco Giovinazzo
| | - Giovanna Bermano
- Centre for Obesity Research and Education (CORE), School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Giovanna Bermano
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Variable somatostatin receptor subtype expression in 151 primary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Hum Pathol 2018; 86:66-75. [PMID: 30529752 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are neuroendocrine tumors that express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), a phenomenon that constitutes a basis for tumor imaging and treatment with somatostatin analogues and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of SSTR1-5 in 151 primary tumors, including 14 metastasized and 16 SDHB-deficient tumors. SSTR2 and SSTR3 were most abundantly present in these tumors, whereas the tumors were mostly negative for SSTR1, SSTR4, and SSTR5. All metastasized PGLs (9/9), but only one metastasized PHEO (1/5), were strongly SSTR2 positive. SSTR3 expression was lower in metastatic tumors and tumors with a high proliferation rate (MIB1 ≥ 5%), but tumors had variable individual SSTR profiles. No correlation was found between SDHB status and SSTR expression. Our results suggest that new SSTR analogues with affinity for several SSTRs could be relevant for a subgroup of patients with these tumors. Better knowledge of tumor SSTR profiles could open the door for personalized imaging and treatment in the future. Because SSTR profiles vary in PHEOs and PGLs, individual analysis is required for each tumor.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vitale G, Dicitore A, Sciammarella C, Di Molfetta S, Rubino M, Faggiano A, Colao A. Pasireotide in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of the literature. Endocr Relat Cancer 2018; 25:R351-R364. [PMID: 29643113 DOI: 10.1530/erc-18-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Somatostatin analogs have an important role in the medical therapy of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Octreotide and lanreotide, both somatostatin analogs binding with high affinity for the somatostatin receptor (SSTR)2, can control symptoms in functional NETs. In addition, these compounds, because of their antiproliferative effects, can stabilize growth of well-differentiated NETs. Pasireotide is a novel multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with high affinity for SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5. This review provides an overview of the state of the art of pasireotide in the treatment of NETs, with the aim of addressing clinical relevance and future perspectives for this molecule in the management of NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Vitale
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health (DISCCO)University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Geriatric and Oncologic Neuroendocrinology ResearchIstituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Dicitore
- Laboratory of Geriatric and Oncologic Neuroendocrinology ResearchIstituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Concetta Sciammarella
- Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Di Molfetta
- Department of Emergency and Organ TransplantationSection of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Manila Rubino
- Unit of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine TumorsEuropean Institute of Oncology, IEO, Milan, Italy
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Department of Clinical Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen RT. Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:909-928. [PMID: 29757017 PMCID: PMC6064188 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the initial approval of everolimus in 2011, there have been a number of important changes in therapeutic/diagnostic modalities as well as classification/staging systems of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which can significantly impact the use of everolimus in patients with advanced NETs. Areas covered: The efficacy of everolimus monotherapy and combination therapy demonstrated in clinical studies involving patients with advanced NETs are reviewed. Several factors affecting everolimus use are described including: the development and routine use of NET classification/staging systems; widespread use of molecular imaging modalities; side effects; drug resistance; and the availability of other treatment options. Furthermore, the current position of everolimus in the treatment approach is discussed, taking into account the recommendations from the recent guidelines. Expert opinion: Although everolimus demonstrated its high efficacy and tolerability in the RADIANT trials and other clinical studies, there still remain a number of controversies related to everolimus treatment in the management of NETs. The synergistic anti-growth effect of other agents in combination with everolimus or its effect on overall survival have not been established. The appropriate order of the use of everolimus in the treatment of advanced NETs still remains unclear, which needs to be defined in further studies and will be addressed in the new guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- a Digestive Diseases Branch , National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , MD , USA
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- b Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre , Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare , Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Robert T Jensen
- a Digestive Diseases Branch , National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gallo M, Ruggeri RM, Muscogiuri G, Pizza G, Faggiano A, Colao A. Diabetes and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Which interplays, if any? Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 67:1-9. [PMID: 29746922 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) represent an uncommon type of pancreatic neoplasm, whose incidence is increasing worldwide. As per exocrine pancreatic cancer, a relationship seems to exist between PanNETs and glycaemic alterations. Diabetes mellitus (DM) or impaired glucose tolerance often occurs in PanNET patients as a consequence of hormonal hypersecretion by the tumour, specifically affecting glucose metabolism, or due to tumour mass effects. On the other hand, pre-existing DM may represent a risk factor for developing PanNETs and is likely to worsen the prognosis of such patients. Moreover, the surgical and/or pharmacological treatment of the tumour itself may impair glucose tolerance, as well as antidiabetic therapies may impact tumour behaviour and patients outcome. Differently from exocrine pancreatic tumours, few data are available for PanNETs as yet on this issue. In the present review, the bidirectional association between glycaemic disorders and PanNETs has been extensively examined, since the co-existence of both diseases in the same individual represents a further challenge for the clinical management of PanNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gallo
- Oncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
| | - Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Messina, Italy
| | | | - Genoveffa Pizza
- Unit of Internal Medicine, Landolfi Hospital, Solofra, Avellino, Italy
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) might occur as a non-familial isolated endocrinopathy or as part of a complex hereditary syndrome, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of PNETs with tumours of the parathyroids and anterior pituitary. Treatments for primary PNETs include surgery. Treatments for non-resectable PNETs and metastases include biotherapy (for example, somatostatin analogues, inhibitors of receptors and monoclonal antibodies), chemotherapy and radiological therapy. All these treatments are effective for PNETs in patients without MEN1; however, there is a scarcity of clinical trials reporting the efficacy of the same treatments of PNETs in patients with MEN1. Treatment of PNETs in patients with MEN1 is challenging owing to the concomitant development of other tumours, which might have metastasized. In recent years, preclinical studies have identified potential new therapeutic targets for treating MEN1-associated neuroendocrine tumours (including PNETs), and these include epigenetic modification, the β-catenin-wingless (WNT) pathway, Hedgehog signalling, somatostatin receptors and MEN1 gene replacement therapy. This Review discusses these advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Frost
- Academic Endocrine Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, OX3 7LJ. United Kingdom
- Endocrine Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, 5000, Denmark
| | - Kate E Lines
- Academic Endocrine Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, OX3 7LJ. United Kingdom
| | - Rajesh V Thakker
- Academic Endocrine Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, OX3 7LJ. United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim HS, Shaib WL, Zhang C, Nagaraju GP, Wu C, Alese OB, Chen Z, Brutcher E, Renfroe M, El-Rayes BF. Phase 1b study of pasireotide, everolimus, and selective internal radioembolization therapy for unresectable neuroendocrine tumors with hepatic metastases. Cancer 2018; 124:1992-2000. [PMID: 29451701 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) metastasize to the liver. Everolimus and selective internal radioembolization (SIRT) are approved treatments. Pasireotide is a somatostatin analogue with an affinity for somatostatin receptors 1, 2, 3, and 5. Everolimus and pasireotide may potentiate SIRT radiosensitization and inhibit rebound angiogenesis. This study evaluated the safety of pasireotide, everolimus, and SIRT. METHODS This 3 + 3 phase 1 trial evaluated 3 dose levels of everolimus (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/day), pasireotide (600 μg twice daily), and SIRT (SIR-Spheres dose on days 9 and 37). Eligibility criteria included well or moderately differentiated NETs, bilobar liver metastases, and progression on long-acting octreotide. Toxicities and responses were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the first 28 days. Correlative markers-angiopoietin 1, angiopoietin 2, basic fibroblast growth factor, collagen V, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, interleukin 8, M30, M65, placenta growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-were assessed. The Norfolk Quality of Life-Neuroendocrine Tumor Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life (QOL). RESULTS Thirteen patients were enrolled; 1 was not evaluable for the primary endpoint. Eleven patients had well-differentiated tumors. The primary sites included small bowel (4), pancreas (3), lung (2), colon (1), gastric (1), and unknown primary (2) were unknown. Four had liver-only disease; 12 completed the planned treatment. No DLTs were observed. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most common toxicity was hyperglycemia. Clinically significant liver toxicity was not observed. One patient had liver progression. QOL improved on treatment. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 18.6 and 46.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The recommended phase 2 dose of everolimus is 10 mg daily in combination with pasireotide and SIRT. The regimen is well tolerated. Preliminary activity appears promising. Cancer 2018;124:1992-2000. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Walid L Shaib
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Christina Wu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Olatunji B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zhengjia Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Edith Brutcher
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Meredith Renfroe
- Clinical Trials Office, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferolla P, Brizzi MP, Meyer T, Mansoor W, Mazieres J, Do Cao C, Léna H, Berruti A, Damiano V, Buikhuisen W, Grønbæk H, Lombard-Bohas C, Grohé C, Minotti V, Tiseo M, De Castro J, Reed N, Gislimberti G, Singh N, Stankovic M, Öberg K, Baudin E. Efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide or everolimus alone or in combination in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung and thymus (LUNA): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1652-1664. [PMID: 29074099 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30681-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no data from prospective studies focused exclusively on patients with advanced lung and thymic carcinoids. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide and everolimus, administered alone or in combination, in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung or thymus. METHODS LUNA was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial of adult patients (aged >18 years) with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), well differentiated carcinoid tumours of the lung or thymus, with radiological progression within 12 months before randomisation, and a WHO performance status of 0-2. At each centre, the investigator or their designee registered each patient using an interactive voice recognition system into one of the three treatment groups. The randomisation allocation sequence was generated by an external company; patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive treatment with long-acting pasireotide (60 mg intramuscularly every 28 days), everolimus (10 mg orally once daily), or both in combination, for the core 12-month treatment period. Patients were stratified by carcinoid type (typical vs atypical) and line of study treatment (first line vs others). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients progression-free at month 9, defined as the proportion of patients with overall lesion assessment at month 9 showing a complete response, partial response, or stable disease according to local Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01563354. The extension phase of the study is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Aug 16, 2013, and Sept 30, 2014, 124 patients were enrolled from 36 centres in nine countries: 41 were allocated to the long-acting pasireotide group, 42 to the everolimus group, and 41 to the combination group. At month 9, the proportion of patients with an overall lesion assessment of complete response, partial response, or stable disease was 16 of 41 patients (39·0%, 95% CI 24·2-55·5) in the long-acting pasireotide group, 14 of 42 patients (33·3%, 19·6-49·5) in the everolimus group, and 24 of 41 patients (58·5%, 42·1-73·7) in the combination group. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were diarrhoea (15 [37%] of 41), hyperglycaemia (17 [41%]), and weight loss (8 [20%]); those with a suspected association with everolimus monotherapy were stomatitis (26 [62%] of 42) and diarrhoea (16 [38%]); and those suspected to be associated with combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (27 [66%] of 41]), diarrhoea (19 [46%]), and asthenia (8 [20%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were γ-glutamyltransferase increased (four [10%] of 41 patients), diarrhoea (three [7%]), and hyperglycaemia (three [7%]); those for everolimus were hyperglycaemia (seven [17%] of 42 patients), stomatitis (four [10%]), and diarrhoea (three [7%]); those for combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (nine [22%] of 41 patients) and diarrhoea (four [10%]). 11 patients died during the core 12-month treatment phase or up to 56 days after the last study treatment exposure date: two (5%) of 41 in the long-acting pasireotide group, six (14%) of 42 in the everolimus group, and three (7%) of 41 in the combination group. No deaths were suspected to be related to long-acting pasireotide treatment. One death in the everolimus group (acute kidney injury associated with diarrhoea), and two deaths in the combination group (diarrhoea and urinary sepsis in one patient, and acute renal failure and respiratory failure in one patient) were suspected to be related to everolimus treatment. In the latter patient, acute renal failure was not suspected to be related to everolimus treatment, but respiratory failure was suspected to be related. INTERPRETATION The study met the primary endpoint in all three treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. Further studies are needed to confirm the antitumour efficacy of the combination of a somatostatin analogue with everolimus in lung and thymic carcinoids. FUNDING Novartis Pharma AG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Ferolla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary NET Group, Umbria Regional Cancer Network and University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | - Tim Meyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital and University College London, London, UK
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Pneumologie, CHU Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Hervé Léna
- Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes, France
| | | | - Vincenzo Damiano
- Molecular Cancer Therapy, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Wieneke Buikhuisen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henning Grønbæk
- Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Grohé
- Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin, Thoracic Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Minotti
- Department of Medical Oncology, SM Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Nicholas Reed
- Clinical Oncology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Neha Singh
- Cognizant Technology Solutions, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Kjell Öberg
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eric Baudin
- Endocrine Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Custodio A, Grande E, Capdevila J, López C, Teule A, Garcia-Carbonero R. Optimizing Somatostatin Analog Use in Well or Moderately Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:72. [PMID: 28920153 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0633-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin analogues, aiming to control tumor secretion or growth, constitute the most attractive therapeutic option for patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art knowledge gaps and potential opportunities for future development and optimization of this therapeutic modality. METHOD A contextualized systematic review with a narrative component was conducted using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Titles were screened, and non-English, duplicate, or irrelevant entries were excluded. Selection criteria for articles included the following: publication in English between 1995 and 2016, patients with GEP-NETs, analysis of efficacy, safety, practical management considerations, predictive factors, and/or strategies for overcoming resistance, concerning somatostatin analogs. RESULTS Ninety-seven studies out of 2771 screened publications met the inclusion criteria (16 randomized clinical trials, 27 phase II trials, 3 phase I trials, 3 subgroup analyses of clinical trials, 1 open-label extension of a randomized trial, 1 phase IV trial, 32 observational studies, and 14 basic research articles). The nature and scope of literature was diverse with most articles dedicated to drug efficacy or indications of use (n = 49), pharmacological issues (n = 8), assessment or predictors of response (n = 4), practical management (n = 11), combination therapy or other means to overcome resistance (n = 19), receptors and signaling pathways (n = 3), and subgroup analyses (n = 3). CONCLUSION In this appraisal, we have found some practical aspects that can help to the optimization of somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in patients with well-differentiated GEP-NETs. We have also identified areas of uncertainty in an effort to guide clinical research in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Calle Marqués de los Vélez, s/n, CP 30008, Murcia, Spain.
| | | | - Ana Custodio
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall D'Hebrón University Hospital, Vall D'Hebrón Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, center affiliated with the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC), Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos López
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Alex Teule
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, center affiliated with the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC), Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío Garcia-Carbonero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, center affiliated with the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer (RTICC), Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gajate P, Martínez-Sáez O, Alonso-Gordoa T, Grande E. Emerging use of everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:215-224. [PMID: 28684922 PMCID: PMC5484559 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s113382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a diverse family of malignancies, which are derived from neuroendocrine cells, most commonly originating from the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract or the bronchopulmonary system. In general, NETs are more indolent than epithelial tumors, with median survival rates of longer than 30 months. The upregulation of mTOR pathway has been shown to play a pivotal role in NET pathogenesis. Inhibition of mTOR protein with everolimus represents a progress in the treatment of advanced NETs. Everolimus has shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and nonfunctional GEP and lung NETs in the Phase III RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors (RADIANT)-3 and RADIANT-4 studies, respectively. In addition, the combination of everolimus with octreotide showed a clinically significant improvement versus octreotide alone in functional NETs in the RADIANT-2 trial. These studies led to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Agency (EMA) approval of everolimus. Safety profile of everolimus is generally acceptable. The most common adverse events are stomatitis, diarrhea, rash and fatigue. There is a growing range of novel treatment options in the setting of NETs, but there are no data comparing the activity of different treatment strategies. Thus, treatment decisions are based on different aspects, such as clinical course, patient symptomatology, primary tumor site, tumor functionality, rate of progression and burden of disease. Further research is required to clarify the treatment sequencing to achieve the maximum prolongation in survival and maintenance of quality of life. Future research should concentrate on identification of predictive biomarkers for benefit from different therapies, and studies should also include quality of life as an important measurement in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Gajate
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Olga Martínez-Sáez
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Enrique Grande
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kulke MH, Ruszniewski P, Van Cutsem E, Lombard-Bohas C, Valle JW, De Herder WW, Pavel M, Degtyarev E, Brase JC, Bubuteishvili-Pacaud L, Voi M, Salazar R, Borbath I, Fazio N, Smith D, Capdevila J, Riechelmann RP, Yao JC. A randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of everolimus in combination with pasireotide LAR or everolimus alone in advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: COOPERATE-2 trial. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1309-1315. [PMID: 28327907 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies have demonstrated the antitumor activity of first-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs), primarily targeting somatostatin receptor (sstr) subtypes 2 and 5, in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Pasireotide, a second-generation SSA, targets multiple sstr subtypes. We compared the efficacy and safety of pasireotide plus everolimus to everolimus alone in patients with advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic NET. Patients and methods Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive a combination of everolimus (10 mg/day, orally) and pasireotide long-acting release (60 mg/28 days, intramuscularly) or everolimus alone (10 mg/day, orally); stratified by prior SSA use, and baseline serum chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. Biomarker response was evaluated in an exploratory analysis. Results Of 160 patients enrolled, 79 were randomized to the combination arm and 81 to the everolimus arm. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. No significant difference was observed in PFS: 16.8 months in combination arm versus 16.6 months in everolimus arm (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.54). Partial responses were observed in 20.3% versus 6.2% of patients in combination arm versus everolimus arm; however, overall disease control rate was similar (77.2% versus 82.7%, respectively). No significant improvement was observed in median overall survival. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of both the drugs; grade 3 or 4 fasting hyperglycemia was seen in 37% versus 11% of patients, respectively. Conclusions The addition of pasireotide to everolimus was not associated with the improvement in PFS compared with everolimus alone in this study. Further studies to delineate mechanisms by which SSAs slow tumor growth in NET are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Kulke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - P Ruszniewski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology University of Paris VII and Beaujon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Lombard-Bohas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester/The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - W W De Herder
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Pavel
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Degtyarev
- Department of Oncology, Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J C Brase
- Department of Oncology, Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - M Voi
- Department of Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA
| | - R Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - N Fazio
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - D Smith
- Department of Oncology, St. Andrew Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R P Riechelmann
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J C Yao
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Flaum N, Valle JW, Mansoor W, McNamara MG. Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the respiratory and gastroenteropancreatic systems. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2561-2578. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.16.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare diverse group of malignancies occurring most commonly in the gastroenteropancreatic system and the lungs. The incidence of NETs is increasing worldwide; median survival for patients with metastatic NETs is 5–65 months. A growing body of evidence shows survival benefit in patients with advanced NETs (gastroenteropancreatic and lung) treated with mTOR inhibitor everolimus, with improvement in survival being demonstrated in the clinical trial and real-world setting. Everolimus has been shown to have a manageable safety profile, with the most common adverse events being stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue and infections. Due to the rarity of the condition, there are challenges in conducting clinical trials in these patients. Further research is required to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy, treatment sequencing and the use of multimodality treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mairéad G McNamara
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Faggiano A, Malandrino P, Modica R, Agrimi D, Aversano M, Bassi V, Giordano EA, Guarnotta V, Logoluso FA, Messina E, Nicastro V, Nuzzo V, Sciaraffia M, Colao A. Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Extrapancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Comprehensive Review of Literature. Oncologist 2016; 21:875-86. [PMID: 27053503 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Everolimus, an oral mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, is currently approved for the treatment of progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although promising, only scattered data, often from nondedicated studies, are available for extrapancreatic NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS A systematic review of the published data was performed concerning the use of everolimus in extrapancreatic NET, with the aim of summarizing the current knowledge on its efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, the usefulness of everolimus was evaluated according to the different sites of the primary. RESULTS The present study included 22 different publications, including 874 patients and 456 extrapancreatic NETs treated with everolimus. Nine different primary sites of extrapancreatic NETs were found. The median progression-free survival ranged from 12.0 to 29.9 months. The median time to progression was not reached in a phase II prospective study, and the interval to progression ranged from 12 to 36 months in 5 clinical cases. Objective responses were observed in 7 prospective studies, 2 retrospective studies, and 2 case reports. Stabilization of the disease was obtained in a high rate of patients, ranging from 67.4% to 100%. The toxicity of everolimus in extrapancreatic NETs is consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. Most adverse events were either grade 1 or 2 and easy manageable with a dose reduction or temporary interruption and only rarely requiring discontinuation. CONCLUSION Treatment with everolimus in patients with extrapancreatic NETs appears to be a promising strategy that is safe and well tolerated. The use of this emerging opportunity needs to be validated with clinical trials specifically designed on this topic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The present study reviewed all the available published data concerning the use of everolimus in 456 extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and summarized the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of this drug, not yet approved except for pancreatic NETs. The progression-free survival rates and some objective responses seem promising and support the extension of the use of this drug. The site-by-site analysis seems to suggest that some subtypes of NETs, such as colorectal, could be more sensitive to everolimus than other primary NETs. No severe adverse events were usually reported and discontinuation was rarely required; thus, everolimus should be considered a valid therapeutic option for extrapancreatic NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antongiulio Faggiano
- Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale" - IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Modica
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Agrimi
- District Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Maurizio Aversano
- Endocrinology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 3, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bassi
- Unit of Internal Medicine, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernesto A Giordano
- Endocrinology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarnotta
- Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialist Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco A Logoluso
- Endocrinology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Messina
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Nuzzo
- Unit of Internal Medicine, San Gennaro Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Annamaria Colao
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Duluc C, Moatassim-Billah S, Chalabi-Dchar M, Perraud A, Samain R, Breibach F, Gayral M, Cordelier P, Delisle MB, Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Tomasini R, Schmid H, Mathonnet M, Pyronnet S, Martineau Y, Bousquet C. Pharmacological targeting of the protein synthesis mTOR/4E-BP1 pathway in cancer-associated fibroblasts abrogates pancreatic tumour chemoresistance. EMBO Mol Med 2016; 7:735-53. [PMID: 25834145 PMCID: PMC4459815 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201404346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is extremely stroma-rich. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) secrete proteins that activate survival and promote chemoresistance of cancer cells. Our results demonstrate that CAF secretome-triggered chemoresistance is abolished upon inhibition of the protein synthesis mTOR/4E-BP1 regulatory pathway which we found highly activated in primary cultures of α-SMA-positive CAFs, isolated from human PDAC resections. CAFs selectively express the sst1 somatostatin receptor. The SOM230 analogue (Pasireotide) activates the sst1 receptor and inhibits the mTOR/4E-BP1 pathway and the resultant synthesis of secreted proteins including IL-6. Consequently, tumour growth and chemoresistance in nude mice xenografted with pancreatic cancer cells and CAFs, or with pieces of resected human PDACs, are reduced when chemotherapy (gemcitabine) is combined with SOM230 treatment. While gemcitabine alone has marginal effects, SOM230 is permissive to gemcitabine-induced cancer cell apoptosis and acts as an antifibrotic agent. We propose that selective inhibition of CAF protein synthesis with sst1-directed pharmacological compounds represents an anti-stromal-targeted therapy with promising chemosensitization potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Duluc
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Siham Moatassim-Billah
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France Biochemistry-Immunology Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Rabat, University Mohammed V - Agdal, Agdal, Morocco
| | - Mounira Chalabi-Dchar
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Aurélie Perraud
- EA 3842 Laboratory, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculties, Limoges University, Limoges, France
| | - Rémi Samain
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Marion Gayral
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Cordelier
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Marie-Pierre Bousquet-Dubouch
- CNRS UMR-5089, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie structurale (IPBS), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Richard Tomasini
- CRCM, INSERM, U1068; Paoli-Calmettes Institute; Aix-Marseille University, UM105; CNRS, UMR7258, Marseille, France
| | | | - Muriel Mathonnet
- EA 3842 Laboratory, Medicine and Pharmacy Faculties, Limoges University, Limoges, France
| | - Stéphane Pyronnet
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Yvan Martineau
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Corinne Bousquet
- INSERM UMR-1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer and Laboratoire d'Excellence Toulouse Cancer (TOUCAN), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abdel-Rahman O, Fouad M. Everolimus-based combination for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): biological rationale and critical review of published data. Tumour Biol 2015; 36:467-78. [DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3064-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
19
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although the somatostatin analog octreotide (OCT) has been used for uncontrollable insulinoma, the mechanism involved is still unknown. The aim of this study was to elucidate the therapeutic effect of OCT for insulinoma. METHODS Mouse insulinoma cell line MIN6 cells were cultured with OCT to clarify its antiproliferative effects, the expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes, cell cycle, p27 expression, and cdc2 kinase activity. The changes of the messenger RNA expression profiles were examined by microarray analysis. Intraperitoneal OCT treatment was given to insulinoma model IT6 mice for 4 weeks. RESULTS MIN6 cells expressed somatostatin receptor 2A, 3, and 5 under the OCT treatment. Octreotide showed a dose-dependent antiproliferative effect on MIN6 cells but not on the other cell lines. p27 expression and cdc2 kinase activity in MIN6 cells became prominent with OCT treatment. At the messenger RNA level, several molecules in the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway were downregulated. The sizes of the individual tumors tended to be smaller in the OCT-treated group. p27 expression was seen in the tumor tissue, but no apoptotic marker was detected. CONCLUSION Octreotide acted through a cytostatic mechanism and could be an effective therapy for insulinoma.
Collapse
|
20
|
Theodoropoulou M, Stalla GK. Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice. Front Neuroendocrinol 2013; 34:228-52. [PMID: 23872332 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Revised: 06/13/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Somatostatin is a peptide with a potent and broad antisecretory action, which makes it an invaluable drug target for the pharmacological management of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1, 2A and B, 3, 4 and 5) belong to the G protein coupled receptor family and have a wide expression pattern in both normal tissues and solid tumors. Investigating the function of each SSTR in several tumor types has provided a wealth of information about the common but also distinct signaling cascades that suppress tumor cell proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. This provided the rationale for developing multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogs and combination therapies with signaling-targeted agents such as inhibitors of the mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR). The ability of SSTR to internalize and the development of rabiolabeled somatostatin analogs have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marily Theodoropoulou
- Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstrasse 10, 80804 Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a long-acting release (LAR) formulation of pasireotide (SOM230) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results from a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase I study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2013; 72:387-95. [PMID: 23765178 PMCID: PMC3719006 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-013-2202-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pasireotide (SOM230), a novel multireceptor ligand somatostatin analog (SSA), binds with high affinity to four of the five somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1-3, 5). This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics profiles of pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) formulation in patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP NET) refractory to other SSAs. METHODS In this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients with biopsy-proven primary or metastatic GEP NET refractory to available SSAs were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pasireotide LAR by deep intragluteal injection at a dose of 20, 40, or 60 mg once every 28 days for 3 months. RESULTS Forty-two patients received pasireotide LAR. Adverse events were reported by 34 (81 %) patients, with the most frequently reported including diarrhea, fatigue, abdominal pain, and nausea. Mean fasting glucose levels were increased compared with baseline at all points throughout the study. After the third injection of pasireotide LAR, the median trough plasma concentrations on day 84 were 4.82, 12.0, and 19.7 ng/mL in the 20-, 40-, and 60-mg treatment groups, respectively. Drug accumulation was limited for each dose based on the increase in trough concentrations after the first to third injections (accumulation ratios were approximately 1 from all dose levels). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that a new, once-monthly, intramuscular LAR formulation of pasireotide was well tolerated in patients with advanced GEP NET. Steady state levels of plasma pasireotide were achieved after three injections.
Collapse
|