The molecular characteristics of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, representing approximately 10 % of all Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. While most pNENs are sporadic, a subset is associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). pNENs are further classified into functioning and non-functioning tumors, with distinct clinical behaviors, prognoses, and treatment approaches. This review explores genetic and environmental biomarkers that influence the risk, prognosis, and therapeutic responses in pNENs. The epidemiology of pNENs reveals an increasing incidence, primarily due to advancements in imaging techniques. Genetic factors play a pivotal role, with germline mutations in MEN1, VHL, and other genes contributing to familial pNENs. Somatic mutations, including alterations in the mTOR pathway and DNA maintenance genes such as DAXX and ATRX, are critical in sporadic pNENs. These mutations, along with epigenetic dysregulation and transcriptomic alterations, underpin the diverse clinical and molecular phenotypes of pNENs. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation profiles, can stratify pNEN subtypes and predict disease progression. Environmental and lifestyle factors, such as diabetes, smoking, and chronic pancreatitis, have been linked to an increased risk of sporadic pNENs. While the association between these factors and tumor progression is still under investigation, their potential role in influencing therapeutic outcomes warrants further study. Advances in systemic therapies, including somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have improved disease management. Biomarkers such as Ki-67, somatostatin receptor expression, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status are being evaluated for their predictive value. Novel approaches, including the use of circulating biomarkers (NETest, circulating tumor cells, and ctDNA) and polygenic risk scores, offer promising avenues for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the need for large, well-annotated datasets and validated biomarkers. Future research should integrate multi-omics approaches and leverage liquid biopsy technologies to refine diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Interdisciplinary collaborations and global consortia are crucial for overcoming current limitations and translating research findings into clinical practice. These insights hold promise for improving prevention, early detection, and tailored treatments, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Basic science and translational implications of current knowledge on neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of malignancies that can occur in various organs, with a notable prevalence in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract, which are the focus of this Review. Although NETs are rare in individual organs, their incidence has increased over recent decades, highlighting the urgent need for current classification systems to evolve by incorporating recent advances in the understanding of NET biology. Several omics studies have revealed molecular subtypes, which, when integrated into existing classification frameworks, may provide more clinically relevant insights for patients with NETs. This Review examines recent progress in elucidating the biology of NETs, with a particular emphasis on the tumor microenvironment and cells of origin. The existence of different cells of origin, which may contribute to distinct molecular groups, along with profiles of immune infiltration - despite being generally low - could explain the emergence of more aggressive cases and the potential for metastatic progression. Given the molecular heterogeneity of NETs and the diversity of their microenvironments and different cells of origin, there is an urgent need to develop morphomolecular classification systems. Such systems would make it possible to better characterize tumor progression, identify new therapeutic targets, and, ultimately, guide the development of personalized therapies.

Activity and Safety of Avelumab in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Progressive after Chemotherapy (AveNEC Trial)

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms grade 3 (NEN G3) are rare tumors with poor prognosis and no established second-line therapy. The role of immune checkpoint blockade in these aggressive tumors remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The phase II AveNEC study evaluated the effect of avelumab (AVE, 10 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks) in 60 patients with well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (N = 22) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (N = 38) progressing after ≥1 prior chemotherapy (excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer).

RESULTS

The best overall response according to immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) was partial response (PR) in three (5%) and stable disease (SD) in nine (15%) patients, with a disease control rate at 16 weeks of 15% (3 PRs; 6 SDs) and a median duration of response of 4.3 months. Six (10%) patients achieved SD or PR for >6 months and two for >1 year. Response rates were similar regardless of differentiation, Ki-67 expression, or primary localization. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and the overall survival was 6.6 months. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, only four (7%) patients were still alive; 1- and 2-year survival rates were 33% and 17%, respectively. Responders had a significantly longer overall survival of 30.2 months compared with 4.8 months in nonresponders. AVE was well tolerated, with few treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events, and the quality of life remained stable during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with progressive high-grade NEN G3, AVE was well tolerated and provided disease control with significant clinical benefit in 15% of heavily pretreated patients.

PRRT in high-grade digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET G3 and NEC)

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been primarily studied in low and intermediate-grade digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NET G1-G2). The documentation of a similar benefit for high-grade digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) has been limited. This review evaluates the use of PRRT for high-grade digestive NEN (well-differentiated NET G3 and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas [NEC]). We identified one phase III trial and seven retrospective studies reporting specifically on PRRT outcome of >10 digestive high-grade NEN patients. The retrospective single-arm studies indicate a benefit for PRRT in NET G3. The randomized phase III NETTER-2 trial demonstrates major PFS superiority of PRRT versus somatostatin analog therapy as the first-line treatment for the NET G3 subgroup. PRRT can now be considered a potential first-line treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive NET G3 patients, but whether it should be the first-line standard of care for all NET G3 patients is still not clarified. For NEC, scarce data are available, and pathologic distinction between NEC and NET G3 can be difficult when Ki-67 is below 55%. PRRT could be considered as a treatment for refractory NEC in very selected cases when there is a high uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging, Ki-67 is below 55%, and there is no rapid tumor progression.

[Neuroendocrine tumors]

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of neoplasms that originate from neuroendocrine cells throughout the body. Diagnosing NETs presents unique challenges due to their varied presentation, morphology, and biological behavior. This article provides an overview of the key diagnostic principles relevant to general pathologists, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical data. The emergence of new markers as well as recent advances in molecular pathology and the application of grading systems are discussed, highlighting their impact on prognosis and therapeutic strategies.

Conditional Activation of c-MYC in Distinct Catecholaminergic Cells Drives Development of Neuroblastoma or Somatostatinoma

c-MYC is an important driver of high-risk neuroblastoma. A lack of c-MYC-driven genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) has hampered the ability to better understand mechanisms of neuroblastoma oncogenesis and to develop effective therapies. In this study, we showed that conditional c-MYC induction via Cre recombinase driven by a tyrosine hydroxylase promoter led to a preponderance of PDX1+ somatostatinoma, a type of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. However, c-MYC activation via an improved Cre recombinase driven by a dopamine β-hydroxylase promoter resulted in neuroblastoma development. The c-MYC murine neuroblastoma tumors recapitulated the pathologic and genetic features of human neuroblastoma and responded to anti-GD2 immunotherapy and difluoromethylornithine, an FDA-approved inhibitor targeting the MYC transcriptional target ODC1. Thus, c-MYC overexpression results in different but related tumor types depending on the targeted cell. The GEMMs represent valuable tools for testing immunotherapies and targeted therapies for these diseases. Significance: The development of c-MYC-driven genetically engineered neuroblastoma and somatostatinoma mouse models provides useful tools for understanding the tumor cell origin and investigating treatment strategies.

The University of Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor Clinic

The Iowa Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET) Clinic was founded and developed by two remarkable physicians, Thomas and Sue O'Dorisio. Tom was an Endocrinologist and close friend and colleague of Aaron Vinik. Both men were pioneers in studies of gastrointestinal hormones and the management of patients with NETs. Sue was a Pediatric Oncologist and research scientist with great expertise in new drug development and clinical trials. She and Tom were leaders in bringing somatostatin analogs and somatostatin-conjugated radioligands to the clinic for the therapy and diagnosis of NETs. All three physicians received lifetime achievement awards for their contributions to the field of NETs. This is the story of how the Iowa NET Clinic developed over the years to become a model for the multidisciplinary mantagement of patients with NETs, culminating in its designation as a European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society NET Center of Excellence, and the receipt of a Specialized Project of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant for the study of NETs from the National Institutes of Health.

Maintenance therapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A literature review

Neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and aggressive malignancies, often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to poor prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas; however after achieving response no consensus exists on maintenance therapies and the results are inconsistent. This review examines the role of maintenance therapy following response to first-line chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. We identified limited supporting evidence, primarily from phase II trials and case reports, that suggested maintenance therapy could be considered for prolonging progression-free survival, balancing toxicity, and maintaining quality of life. Nevertheless, prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical efficacy.

FBXW7 in gastrointestinal cancers: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic prospects

F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7 (FBXW7), formerly known as hCdc4, hAGO Fbw7, or SEL10, plays a specific recognition function in SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligases. FBXW7 is a well-established cancer suppressor gene that specifically controls proteasomal degradation and destruction of many key oncogenic substrates. The FBXW7 gene is frequently abnormal in human malignancies especially in gastrointestinal cancers. Accumulating evidence reveals that mutations and deletions of FBXW7 are participating in the occurrence, progression and treatment resistance of human gastrointestinal cancers. Considering the current therapeutic challenges faced by gastrointestinal cancers, elucidating the biological function and molecular mechanism of FBXW7 can provide new perspectives and references for future personalized treatment strategies. In this review, we elucidate the key molecular mechanisms by which FBXW7 and its substrates are involved in gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, we discuss the consequences of FBXW7 loss or dysfunction in tumor progression and underscore its potential as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker. Lastly, we propose potential therapeutic strategies targeting FBXW7 to guide the precision treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

Diagnostic relevance of p53 and Rb status in neuroendocrine tumors G3 from different organs: an immunohistochemical study of 465 high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms

The double inactivation of TP53 and RB1 is considered typical of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) but is assumed to be rare in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The immunohistochemical determination of the p53 and Rb status has therefore been proposed as a diagnostic tool. We studied this status in a large series of high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms, from multiple origins, in order to (a) assess the patterns observed in the different histopathological categories, (b) compare them between the various anatomic sites, and (c) evaluate their possible diagnostic relevance. Four hundred sixty-five cases from 9 organ systems (142 high-grade NETs -NET-G3-, 162 large-cell NECs -LCNEC-, 144 small-cell NECs -SCNEC-) and 60 cases of NET G1/G2 were included. The expression of both proteins was normal in 96.7% of NET G1/G2, 76.7% of NET-G3, and 5.8% of all NECs. p53 expression was abnormal in 12.7% of NET-G3 and 91.5% of NECs. Rb expression was lost in 10.6% of NET-G3 and 68.3% of NECs. Rb loss was significantly less frequent in LCNEC than in SCNEC (57.3% versus 80.6%); abnormal p53 expression was comparable in the two categories. Patterns were comparable between primary sites, except for head and neck NECs. For diagnostic purposes, taking into account, Rb status improved, but only marginally, the performances of p53 status. In conclusion, our study underlines the molecular heterogeneity of NET-G3 and LCNEC, irrespectively of the primary, and provides further insight on the diagnostic relevance of p53/Rb immunodetection in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Clinicopathological Features of Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Analysis of Twenty-Two Cases

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-positive neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare neoplasm with limited histopathological and therapeutic data. This report presents 22 cases of EBV-positive NEC, analyzing age distribution, morphology, and immunophenotype. The median patient age was 47 years (range: 27-67 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 17:5. Most cases (86%, 19/22) were localized to the nasal cavity or nasopharynx, while the remaining three (14%, 3/22) involved the lung, eyelid, and chest wall. Tumors were identified as small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) based on cellular morphology. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positivity for at least one, but generally, two neuroendocrine markers and INI1, while negativity for NUT and squamous cell carcinoma markers, such as p63, p40, and CK5/6. In situ hybridization consistently revealed EBV early RNAs (EBERs) in all cases. Notably, eight patients benefited from chemoradiotherapy. Recognizing this rare tumor is essential for optimizing treatment strategies.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor brain Metastases: Systematic review and Illustrative case presentation

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) brain metastases (BM) are rare malignancies which frequently bear a poor prognosis and have the potential to secrete hormones. The optimal treatment approach for these metastases remains unclear, with significant heterogeneity occurring both across and within primary tumor types, and outcome data are limited. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) BM may be particularly aggressive. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for other NET BM has previously been described, no report has specifically investigated SRS for management of pNET BM.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Search terms included ("neuroendocrine tumor" OR "neuroendocrine neoplasm" OR "neuroendocrine carcinoma" OR "NET") AND ("brain metastasis" OR "brain metastases" OR "intracranial metastases") AND ("stereotactic radiosurgery" OR "stereotactic body" OR "CyberKnife" OR "GammaKnife").

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 230 articles. After screening, a total of 16 articles with 256 patients were identified. Number of patients per study cohort ranged from 1 to 101 (mean = 16). Ten articles were single case reports. The most commonly investigated primary site was lung (5 studies), followed by skin (2 case reports), and uterine cervix (2 case reports). Median survival post-SRS ranged from 5 to 42 months. Median tumor volume ranged from 0.08 cm3 to 33.62 cm3. Local control rate was provided in 3 of 6 of the reviewed retrospective analyses. A pulmonary cohort of 101 patients reported a recurrence rate of 13.8 % at 12 months. A pulmonary case series similarly reported local progression in only 1 of 8 patients. The mixed primary cohort (33 patients) had a long-term local failure rate of 16.7 %. In addition, we describe a first reported individual case of pNET BM treated with SRS. Nearly 6-years after initial pNET diagnosis, multiple intracranial enhancing lesions were found, which were subsequently treated with SRS. Follow-up imaging demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in lesion diameter (p < 0.001), with none of the 18 BM progressing.

CONCLUSION

Given the recently increase in age-adjusted incidence of NET BM, determining an optimal treatment approach for these malignancies is of growing importance. Prognosis generally remains poor, with BM being a significant predictor of overall survival. Our review indicated large variability in outcomes both between and within primary tumor types, suggesting a need for further investigation of predictive molecular biomarkers. In addition, to the authors' knowledge, this represents the first reported case of pNET BM successfully treated with SRS.

Biomarkers to Inform Prognosis and Treatment for Unresectable or Metastatic GEP-NENs

Importance

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

Objective

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

Methods

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

Findings

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

Progression of Low-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) to High-Grade Neoplasms Harboring the NEC-Like Co-alteration of RB1 and TP53

High-grade or grade 3 epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 NEN) are now divided into grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (G3 NET) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), both defined by Ki-67 > 20% and/or > 20 mitoses per 2 mm2. NET and NEC are thought to be distinct tumors with different genetic profiles: NEC classically harbors co-alteration of TP53 and RB1, whereas NET genetics are site-dependent with frequent alterations in MEN1, ATRX, DAXX, and TSC1/2 in pancreatic NETs. Progression from NET to NEC is considered rare and is not well described. While both TP53 and RB1 alterations were initially thought to be rare in NET, recent work has demonstrated the former in up to 35% of high-grade G3 NET and the latter in rare high-grade NEN that progressed from NET. Here, we describe the clinical, pathologic, and molecular features associated with tumor evolution in a series of five patients that had low-grade NET that progressed to high-grade NEN with co-alteration of RB1 and TP53, similar to NEC. Morphology of the high-grade neoplasms remained well-differentiated in some cases despite RB1/TP53 co-alteration and had some NEC-like features in other cases. All five patients died of disease, with a mean overall survival of 41 months from the first metastatic disease and 12 months from acquisition of RB1/TP53 co-alteration. Our data demonstrate that low-grade NET can progress via the acquisition of both TP53 and RB1 alteration, similar to NEC, but whether this represents a transformation from NET to NEC remains unclear.

NETest in advanced high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Molecular blood biomarkers are lacking for high-grade (HG) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). To histologically distinguish between neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NET G3), adenocarcinoma and MINEN is often challenging. The mRNA-based NETest has diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value in neuroendocrine tumors G1-2 but has not been studied in HG GEP-NEN. Patients with advanced HG GEP-NEN were prospectively included in an observational study. A blood sample was collected before the start of chemotherapy and pseudonymised before NETest was performed. NETest results are expressed as an activity index (NETest score) from 0 to 100. The normal score cut-off is 20. Histological sections were pseudonymised before centralized pathological re-evaluation. Samples from 60 patients were evaluable with the NETest. Main primary tumor sites were colon (14), rectum (12), pancreas (11) and esophagus (7). Re-classification: 30 NEC, 12 NET G3, 3 HG-NEN ambiguous morphology, 8 MiNEN, 3 adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation (ADNE), 3 adenocarcinomas and 1 NET G2. Elevated NETest (>20) was seen in 38/45 (84%) HG GEP-NEN, all 17 large-cell NEC (100%), 11/13 (85%) small-cell NEC, all ambiguous cases and 7/12 (64%) NET G3. NETest was elevated in 5/8 (63%) MiNEN, 2/3 ADNE, however not in 3 adenocarcinomas. Median survival was 10.2 months (9.6-10.8 95%CI) for evaluable HG GEP-NEN treated with palliative chemotherapy (n = 39), and survival was significantly shorter in patients with NETest >60 with an OS of only 6.5 months. This is the first study to evaluate use of the NETest in advanced HG GEP-NEN. The NETest was almost always elevated in GEP-NEC and in all large-cell NEC. The NETest was also frequently elevated in NET G3 and MiNEN, however cases were limited. Baseline NETest was not predictive for benefit of chemotherapy, however a NETest >60 was prognostic with a shorter survival for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Clinicopathological correlations in 38 cases of gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms

Objective

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-HG-NENs), particularly G3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) relies on histopathological morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biological markers, which are lacking especially in cases with ambiguous histomorphology. In this study to contribute to the development of more targeted treatment strategies, we examined various immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and their association with clinicopathological features in GEP-HG-NENs.

Methods

We included 38 patients with GEP-HG-NENs in this study, with their retrospective follow-up data. The expression of tumour protein p53 (TP53), RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1), somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), clusterin (CLU), and marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67) was immunohistochemically analysed. KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E expression was evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The relationships between immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and clinicopathological characteristics were examined using a Cox risk regression model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

Results

SSTR2, RB, TP53, and CLU expression differed between NET G3 and NECs, with variations among the NET G3 and small- and large-cell NEC (SCNEC and LCNEC, respectively) groups (p < 0.05). The median MKI67 proliferative index was approximately 40% and 70% in G3 NETs and NECs, respectively. The NET G3 group exhibited a median survival of 25 months, indicating a relatively better prognosis than that of the NECs group (median survival, 11 months). Both Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox risk regression model indicated a statistical correlation among treatment methods, CLU expression, and prognosis (p < 0.05). The BRAF V600E mutation rate was 32.4% in G3 NETs and SCNEC, demonstrating a significant difference between both types (p = 0.0086). Furthermore, ROC curve analysis highlighted the diagnostic significance of the positive expression of the immunohistochemical markers CLU, SSTR2, and RB in identifying NET G3.

Conclusion

To guide more suitable treatment strategies, it is essential to develop and apply valuable and more targeted immunohistochemical and molecular pathological markers for a comprehensive analysis.

Opposing Effects of Cannabidiol in Patient-derived Neuroendocrine Tumor, Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Primary Cultures

CONTEXT

Treatment options for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are still limited. In recent years, antitumor effects of cannabinoids have been reported; however, there are only very limited data available in NETs or PPGLs.

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on patient-derived human NET/PPGL primary cultures and on NET/PPGL cell lines.

METHODS

We established primary cultures derived from 46 different patients with PPGLs (n = 35) or NETs (n = 11) who underwent tumor resection at 2 centers. Treatment of patient primary cultures with clinically relevant doses (5 µM) and slightly higher doses (10 µM) of CBD was performed.

RESULTS

We found opposing effects of 5 µM CBD: significant antitumor effects in 5/35 (14%) and significant tumor-promoting effects in 6/35 (17%) of PPGL primary cultures. In terms of antitumor effects, cluster 2-related PPGLs showed significantly stronger responsivity to CBD compared to cluster 1-related PPGLs (P = .042). Of the cluster 2-related tumors, NF1 PPGLs showed the strongest responsivity (4/5 PPGL primary cultures with a significant decrease in cell viability were NF1-mutated). We also found opposing effects of 10 µM CBD in PPGLs and NETs: significant antitumor effects in 9/33 of PPGL (27%) and 3/11 of NET (27%) primary cultures and significant tumor-promoting effects in 6/33 of PPGL (18%) and 2/11 of NET (18%) primary cultures.

CONCLUSION

We suggest a potential novel treatment option for some NETs/PPGLs but also provide evidence for caution when applying cannabinoids as supportive therapy for pain or appetite management to cancer patients and possibly as health supplements.

Update in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a diverse group of neoplasms that can occur in various areas throughout the body. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) most often arise in the gastrointestinal tract, termed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Although GEP-NETs are still uncommon, their incidence and prevalence have been steadily increasing over the past decades. The primary treatment for GEP-NETs is surgery, which offers the best chance for a cure. However, because GEP-NETs are often slow-growing and do not cause symptoms until they have spread widely, curative surgery is not always an option. Significant advances have been made in systemic and locoregional treatment options in recent years, including peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy with α and β emitters, somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and targeted molecular therapies.

Genomic Landscape of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Implications for Clinical Practice

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are the second most prevalent neoplasms of the pancreas with variable prognosis and clinical course. Our knowledge of the genetic alterations in patients with pNETs has expanded in the past decade with the availability of whole-genome sequencing and germline testing. This review will focus on potential clinical applications of the genetic testing in patients with pNETs. For somatic testing, we discuss the commonly prevalent somatic mutations and their impact on prognosis and treatment of patients with pNET. We also highlight the relevant genomic biomarkers that predict response to specific treatments. Previously, germline testing was only recommended for high-risk patients with syndromic features (MEN1, VHL, TSC, and NF1), we review the evolving paradigm of germline testing in pNETs as recent studies have now shown that sporadic-appearing pNETs can also harbor germline variants.

Treatment outcome according to genetic tumour alterations and clinical characteristics in digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy has limited efficacy in advanced digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) and prognosis is dismal. Predictive markers for palliative chemotherapy are lacking, and prognostic markers are limited.

METHODS

Digestive HG-NEN patients (n = 229) were prospectively included 2013-2017. Pathological re-assessment revealed 188 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 41 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Tumour-DNA was sequenced across 360 cancer-related genes, assessing mutations (mut) and copy number alterations. We linked sequencing results to clinical information and explored potential markers for first-line chemotherapy efficacy and survival.

RESULTS

In NEC given cis/carboplatin and etoposide (PE), TP53mut predicted inferior response rate in multivariate analyses (p = 0.009) and no BRAFmut NEC showed response. In overall assessment of PE-treated NEC, no genetic alterations were prognostic for OS. For small-cell NEC, TP53mut were associated with longer OS (p = 0.011) and RB1 deletions predicted lack of immediate-progression (p = 0.003). In non-small cell NEC, APC mut were associated with immediate-progression and shorter PFS (p = 0.008/p = 0.004). For NET G3, ATRXmut, ARID1A- and ERS1 deletions were associated with shorter PFS.

CONCLUSION

Correlations between genetic alterations and response/immediate-progression to PE were frequent in NEC but affected PFS or OS only when subdividing for cell-type. The classification of digestive NEC into large- and small-cell seems therefore molecularly and clinically relevant.

PCDHGC3 hypermethylation as a potential biomarker of intestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in various organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, adrenal gland, and paraganglia. Despite advancements, accurately predicting the aggressiveness of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs based solely on pathological data remains challenging, thereby limiting optimal clinical management. Our previous research unveiled a crucial link between hypermethylation of the protocadherin PCDHGC3 gene and neuroendocrine tumors originating from the paraganglia and adrenal medulla. This epigenetic alteration was associated with increased metastatic potential and succinate dehydrogenase complex (SDH) dysfunction. Expanding upon this discovery, the current study explored PCDHGC3 gene methylation within the context of GEP-NENs in a cohort comprising 34 cases. We uncovered promoter hypermethylation of PCDHGC3 in 29% of GEP-NENs, with a significantly higher prevalence in gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) compared with both pancreatic (Pan) NECs and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of GI and Pan origin. Importantly, these findings were validated in one of the largest multi-center GEP-NEN cohorts. Mechanistic analysis revealed that PCDHGC3 hypermethylation was not associated with SDH mutations or protein loss, indicating an SDH-independent epigenetic mechanism. Clinically, PCDHGC3 hypermethylation emerged as a significant prognostic factor, correlating with reduced overall survival rates in both patient cohorts. Significantly, whereas PCDHGC3 hypermethylation exhibited a strong correlation with TP53 somatic mutations, a hallmark of NEC, its predictive value surpassed that of TP53 mutations, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI 0.83-1.0) for discriminating GI-NECs from GI-NETs, highlighting its superior predictive performance. In conclusion, our findings position PCDHGC3 methylation status as a promising molecular biomarker for effectively stratifying patients with GI-NENs. This discovery has the potential to advance patient care by enabling more precise risk assessments and tailored treatment strategies. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Germline variants in patients diagnosed with pediatric soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

While soft tissue sarcomas affect younger patients, few studies have assessed the distribution of underlying pathogenic germline variants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all pediatric and young adult patients (0-22 years) at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway (1981-2019), through clinical and pathological records. We identified n = 46 eligible patients. From these 46 patients, adequate material representing normal tissue was available for n = 41 cases (n = 24 diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma, 9 with synovial sarcomas, 2 with Ewing sarcomas, and 6 without further classification), with matching tumor tissue for n = 40. Normal tissue samples were analyzed for germline pathogenic variants (PVs) by targeted sequencing of 360 cancer genes.

RESULTS

Out of the 41 analyzed cases, we found PVs or likely PVs in 7 (17%). These variants were found in TP53, MUTYH, FANCC, DICER1, FANCA, MYO3A, and MYO5B. Supporting the causality of these PVs, four cases revealed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele in the tumor tissue, one patient with a PV in DICER1 had a second somatic variant in DICER1, and a patient with a PV in TP53 had the altered allele amplified in the tumor. For three out of five with available family history, a history of other cancers in relatives was recorded. Among genes with variants of uncertain significance, CHD1L was of particular interest, revealing a stop-gain and a missense variant.

INTERPRETATION

A high fraction of young patients with soft tissue sarcoma harbor PVs. Among the genes affected, we substantiate a potential role of MYO5B and propose a potential role for MYO3A.

Immunotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Diamond to Cut

A raise in the incidence of NENs is expected. Therefore, the identification of new therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, remains crucial. To date, immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy have shown modest activity in unselected NENs. Although immunotherapy combos (plus another immune agents or chemotherapy, among others) are potentially more active than single agents, this has not been uniformly confirmed, even in high-grade NENs. Other immunotherapeutic strategies under development include bispecific antibodies, targeting specific tumor antigens like DLL3, and cell therapy. Currently, no predictive immune biomarkers are available to guide clinical decisions. A comprehensive tumor molecular profiling approach needs to be developed for the selection of patients with NEN who could potentially benefit from immunotherapy. Ideally, clinical trials should incorporate this tumor molecular profiling to identify predictive biomarkers and improve efficacy. Achieving this goal requires an international collaborative effort.

Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization of high-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

High-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms (HG GEP-NENs) can be stratified according to their morphology and Ki-67 values into three prognostic classes: neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NETs G3), neuroendocrine carcinomas with Ki-67 < 55% (NECs <55) and NECs with Ki-67 ≥ 55% (NECs ≥55).

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of 49 HG GEP-NENs by targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (TrueSight Oncology 500), RNA-seq, and immunohistochemistry for p53, Rb1, SSTR-2A, and PD-L1.

RESULTS

Frequent genomic alterations affected TP53 (26%), APC (20%), KRAS and MEN1 (both 11%) genes. NET G3 were enriched in MEN1 (p = 0.02) mutations, while both NECs groups were enriched in TP53 (p = 0.001), APC (p = 0.002) and KRAS (p = 0.02) mutations and tumors with TMB ≥ 10 muts/Mb (p = 0.01). No differentially expressed (DE) gene was found between NECs <55% and NECs ≥55%, while 1129 DE genes were identified between NET G3 and NECs. A slight enrichment of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in NECs and of cancer-associated fibroblasts and macrophages (M2-like) in NET G3. Multivariate analysis identified histologic type and Rb1 loss as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that GEP-NET G3 and GEP-NECs exhibit clear genomic and transcriptomic differences, differently from GEP-NECs <55% and GEP-NECs ≥55%, and provided molecular findings with prognostic and potentially predictive value.

Efficacy of first-line chemotherapy based on primary site of tumor versus etoposide-platinum in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) constitute a rare and aggressive group of malignancies usually with widespread disease. There are limited studies on GEP-NECs, and therefore, we aim to acquire more information on the clinical features, treatment regimens, and prognosis.

Methods

Data from advanced GEP-NECs patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2010 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. Relationships between clinical-pathological features, treatment regimens, and prognosis were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models.

Results

A total of fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 65.5 years and 79.6% were male. At diagnosis, 51.9% and 3.7% of patients developed liver and brain metastasis respectively. Sixteen (29.6%) patients received chemotherapy according to primary site of tumor (PST), while thirty-eight (70.4%) were treated with etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen, which based on the first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). No significant differences on progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were observed between these two groups. Univariate survival analysis showed that liver metastasis, elevated baseline serum carcinoembryonic antigen, elevated baseline serum neuron-specific enolase, elevated baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated baseline serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with shorter PFS. After multivariate analysis, elevated NLR was the only factor that remained significantly associated with shorter PFS (P=0.01).

Conclusions

GEP-NECs are aggressive neoplasms, of which elevated NLR is proven to be an independent negative predictor. Treatment regimens based on PST are not inferior to regiments based on SCLC (EP) for GEP-NECs patients. Large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials are required to establish the standard of care.

Molecular Classification of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Are We Ready for That?

In the last two decades, the increasing availability of technologies for molecular analyses has allowed an insight in the genomic alterations of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. This knowledge has confirmed, supported, and informed the pathological classification of NEN, clarifying the differences between neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and helping to define the G3 NET category. At the same time, the identification genomic alterations, in terms of gene mutation, structural abnormalities, and epigenetic changes differentially involved in the pathogenesis of NEC and NET has identified potential molecular targets for precision therapy. This review critically recapitulates the available molecular features of digestive NEC and NET, highlighting their correlates with pathological aspects and clinical characteristics of these neoplasms and revising their role as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy. In this context, the feasibility and applicability of a molecular classification of gastrointestinal and pancreatic NEN will be explored.

Well-differentiated G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis of published expanded DNA sequencing data

Introduction

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) can be non-functional or functional, e.g. insulinoma and glucagonoma. The majority of PNETs are sporadic, but PNETs also occur in hereditary syndromes, primarily multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). The Knudson hypothesis stated a second, somatic hit in MEN1 as the cause of PNETs of MEN1 syndrome. In the recent years, reports on genetic somatic events in both sporadic and hereditary PNETs have emerged, providing a basis for a more detailed molecular understanding of the pathophysiology. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we made a collation and statistical analysis of aggregated frequent genetic alterations and potential driver events in human grade G1/G2 PNETs.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines of 2020. A search in Pubmed for published studies using whole exome, whole genome, or targeted gene panel (+400 genes) sequencing of human G1/G2 PNETs was conducted at the 25th of September 2023. Fourteen datasets from published studies were included with data on 221 patients and 225 G1/G2 PNETs, which were divided into sporadic tumors, and hereditary tumors with pre-disposing germline variants, and tumors with unknown germline status. Further, non-functioning and functioning PNETs were distinguished into two groups for pathway evaluation. The collated genetical analyses were conducted using the 'maftools' R-package.

Results

Sporadic PNETs accounted 72.0% (162/225), hereditary PNETs 13.3% (30/225), unknown germline status 14.7% (33/225). The most frequently altered gene was MEN1, with somatic variants and copy number variations in overall 42% (95/225); hereditary PNETs (germline variations in MEN1, VHL, CHEK2, BRCA2, PTEN, CDKN1B, and/or MUTYH) 57% (16/30); sporadic PNETs 36% (58/162); unknown germline status 64% (21/33). The MEN1 point mutations/indels were distributed throughout MEN1. Overall, DAXX (16%, 37/225) and ATRX-variants (12%, 27/225) were also abundant with missense mutations clustered in mutational hotspots associated with histone binding, and translocase activity, respectively. DAXX mutations occurred more frequently in PNETs with MEN1 mutations, p<0.05. While functioning PNETs shared few variated genes, non-functioning PNETs had more recurrent variations in genes associated with the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase, Wnt, NOTCH, and Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Ras signaling onco-pathways.

Discussion

The somatic genetic alterations in G1/G2 PNETs are diverse, but with distinct differences between sporadic vs. hereditary, and functional vs. non-functional PNETs. Increased understanding of the genetic alterations may lead to identification of more drivers and driver hotspots in the tumorigenesis in well-differentiated PNETs, potentially giving a basis for the identification of new drug targets. (Funded by Novo Nordisk Foundation, grant number NNF19OC0057915).

Predictive Nomogram and Propensity Score Matching in Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Tubular Gastrointestinal Tract: A US Population-Based Clinical Outcome Study

Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the tubular gastrointestinal tract (GI-NECs) are rare and associated with worse clinical outcomes. This population-based study aims to highlight key demographics, clinicopathological factors, and survival outcomes in the US population. Methods: Data from 10,387 patients with GI-NECs were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020. Results: Most patients were >40 years old at the time of presentation with a median age of 63 years old, with almost equal ethnic distribution per US population data. The most common primary tumor site was the small intestine (33.6%). The metastatic spread was localized in 34.8%, regional in 27.8%, and distant in 37.3% of cases, and the liver was the most common site of metastasis (19.9%) in known cases of metastases. Most NEC patients underwent surgery, presenting the highest 5-year overall survival of 73.2% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI 72.0-74.4%), while chemotherapy alone had the lowest 5-year survival of 8.0% (95% CI 6.4-10.0%). Compared to men, women had a superior 5-year survival rate of 59.0% (95% CI 57.6-60.5%). On multivariate analysis, age > 65 (HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.36-2.54%, p ≤ 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.52-2.62%, p ≤ 0.001), tumor size > 4 mm (HR 1.98, 95%, CI 1.70-2.31%, p ≤ 0.001), esophageal (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.86-2.58%, p ≤ 0.001), transverse colon (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.33%, p ≤ 0.01), descending colon (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12, 3.97%, p = 0.02) anorectal sites, and liver or lung metastases were associated with worse survival. Surgical intervention and tumors located in the small intestine or appendix showed a better prognosis. Conclusion: GI-NECs are a group of rare malignancies associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, epidemiological studies analyzing national databases may be the best alternative to have a more comprehensive understanding of this condition, assess the impact of current practices, and generate prognosis tools.

The Relationship Between Gene Mutations and the Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer

Current treatments for gastric cancer (GC) are suboptimal. Potential therapeutic targets for GC were screened using next-generation sequencing. We examined many mutation genes linked to GC, including TP53 (60%), PIK3CA (19%), LRP1B (13%), and ERBB2 (12%), ARID1A (9%), KMT2C (9%), and KRAS (7%). The KMT2C, KRAS, CDK6, and ARID1A wild-type genes were dominant in diffuse-type GC (P < .05), but mutations did not influence prognosis. Patients with APC (6%) and CDH1 (8%) wild-type GC presented with vascular invasion (P < .05). Patients with ATR (2%) wild-type GC were prone to lymph node metastasis (P < .05). Patients with ARID1A (9%) wild-type GC had reduced programmed death ligand 1 expression (<1, P < .05). We found that patients who received chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those who did not (although there was no statistical difference), with platinum-based group having better prognosis and uracil combined with paclitaxel group having worse prognosis.

Genetics-guided therapy in neuroendocrine carcinoma: response to BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors

Background

Metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is associated with short survival. Other than platinum-based chemotherapy, there is no clear standard regimen. Current guidelines suggest that combination treatment with BRAF-inhibitors should be considered for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated NEC. However, since only eight such patients have been reported in the literature, our object was to confirm the validity of this recommendation.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at Uppsala University Hospital. The included patients 1) had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of NEC, 2) were diagnosed between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2023, 3) had tumor tissue genetically screened by a broad next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, and 4) showed a tumor mutation for which there is a currently available targeted therapy.

Results

We screened 48 patients diagnosed with NEC between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2023. Twelve had been analyzed with a broad NGS-panel, and two had a targetable mutation. Both these patients harbored a BRAF V600E-mutated colon-NEC and were treated with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib in second-line. At first radiological evaluation (RECIST 1.1), both patients had a reduction of tumor size, which decreased by 31 and 40%. Both had short response periods, and their overall survival was 12 and 9 months.

Conclusions

BRAF-mutated NEC is sensitive to treatment with BRAF- and MEK-inhibitor combination. These results further support that DNA sequencing should be considered as standard of care in NECs to screen for potential treatment targets.

Expression and clinical value of CXCR4 in high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is associated with the progression and metastasis of numerous malignant tumors. However, its relationship with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grade 3 (GEP-NENs G3) is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of CXCR4 in GEP-NENS and to explore the clinical and prognostic value of CXCR4.

Methods

This study retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data from patients with GEP-NENs who receiving surgery in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2013 to April 2021, and obtained the overall survival of the patients based on follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pathological paraffin sections to observe CXCR4 staining. Groups were made according to pathological findings. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve was used to evaluate prognosis. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

100 GEP-NENs G3 patients were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in primary sites (P=0.002), Ki-67 index (P<0.001), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) elevation (P=0.008) between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). CXCR4 was highly expressed only in tumors, low or no expressed in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). The expression level of CXCR4 in NEC was significantly higher than that in NET G3 (P=0.038). The K-M curves showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with high CXCR4 expression and patients with low CXCR4 expression, either in GEP-NEN G3 or NEC (P=0.920, P=0.842. respectively).

Conclusion

Differential expression of CXCR4 was found between tumor and adjacent tissues and between NET G3 and NEC. Our results demonstrated that CXCR4 can be served as a new IHC diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of GEP-NENs G3. Further studies with multi-center, large sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the correlation between CXCR4 expression level and prognosis.

Patient derived tumoroids of high grade neuroendocrine neoplasms for more personalized therapies

There are no therapeutic predictive biomarkers or representative preclinical models for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN), a highly aggressive, fatal, and heterogeneous malignancy. We established patient-derived (PD) tumoroids from biobanked tissue samples of advanced high-grade GEP-NEN patients and applied this model for targeted rapid ex vivo pharmacotyping, next-generation sequencing, and perturbational profiling. We used tissue-matched PD tumoroids to profile individual patients, compared ex vivo drug response to patients' clinical response to chemotherapy, and investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses.PD tumoroids recapitulated biological key features of high-grade GEP-NEN and mimicked clinical response to cisplatin and temozolomide ex vivo. When we investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses in PD tumoroids in silico, we discovered and functionally validated Lysine demethylase 5 A and interferon-beta, which act synergistically in combination with cisplatin. Since ex vivo drug response in PD tumoroids matched clinical patient responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics for GEP-NEN, our rapid and functional precision oncology approach could expand personalized therapeutic options for patients with advanced high-grade GEP-NEN.

Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas

Objective

There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.

Methods

We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.

Results

We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, KRAS, RB1, TERT, IL7R, and CTNNB1 were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( TERT amplification), colorectal NEC ( KRAS mutation), and bile tract NEC ( ARID1A mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were KEAP1 and CDH1. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested RB1, APC, and KRAS as significant genes. The TP53/ RB1 mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months vs. 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].

Conclusions

This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.

[Practical application of immunohistochemistry in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms : Tips and pitfalls]

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN) are rather rare entities. Morphology, combined with immunohistochemistry, allows typing and grading, thereby leading therapeutic decisions. Depending on tumor stage and differential diagnosis, a broad diagnostic panel may be required. The present work summarizes the minimal diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers in PanNEN.Markers of choice for defining a neuroendocrine phenotype are synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and INSM1. The proliferation fraction Ki67 is indispensable for grading, while p53 and Rb1 can help in the differentiation from neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Transcription factors, such as cdx2, TTF‑1, and Islet‑1, can indicate the site of a primary tumor in the setting of a cancer of unknown primary (CUP). DAXX/ATRX immunohistochemistry has mainly prognostic value. Molecular pathology studies currently have little practical value in the diagnosis of PanNEN.An important pitfall in routine diagnostics is the wide spectrum of differential diagnoses mimicking neuroendocrine neoplasms. An expanded immunohistochemical panel is strongly recommended in case of doubt.

Treatment modalities favoring outcome in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3

Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in multiple organs. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G3 encompass a small subgroup accounting for less than 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. In contrast to NET G1 and G2 as well as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), in NET G3 data on treatment and patient outcomes are still limited. Especially in a metastasized tumor stage, the role of surgery, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy is not clearly defined.

Methods

In this real-life cohort, we consecutively analyzed clinical outcome in NET G3 patients receiving different diagnostic and treatment.

Results and discussion

We found that even metastasized NET G3 patients undergoing surgery, or receiving radiation, somatostatin analogues (SSA), and PRRT showed a clear survival benefit. Interestingly, all treatment regimen were superior to classical chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET-CT, FDG PET-CT, and repetitive biopsies were shown to be useful diagnostic and prognostic tools in NET G3. Our study demonstrates that patients with highly proliferative NET G3 might benefit from less aggressive treatment modalities commonly used in low proliferative NEN.

Current understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms in neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that important advances in research on neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have been made, consistent data about their pathogenetic mechanism are still lacking. Furthermore, different primary sites may recognize different pathogenetic mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the possible biological and molecular mechanisms that may lead to NEN onset and progression in different organs. Through extensive research of the literature, risk factors including hypercholesterolemia, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic atrophic gastritis are evaluated as potential pathogenetic mechanisms. Consistent evidence is available regarding sporadic gastric NENs and MEN1 related duodenopancreatic NENs precursor lesions, and genetic-epigenetic mutations may play a pivotal role in tumor development and bone metastases onset. In lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), diffuse proliferation of neuroendocrine cells on the bronchial wall (DIPNECH) has been proposed as a premalignant lesion, while in lung neuroendocrine carcinoma nicotine and smoke could be responsible for carcinogenic processes. Also, rare primary NENs such as thymic (T-NENs) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have been analyzed, finding different possible pathogenetic mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

New technologies in genomics and epigenomics are bringing new light to the pathogenetic landscape of NENs, but further studies are needed to improve both prevention and treatment in these heterogeneous neoplasms.

Differentially expressed microRNA in prognosis of gastric cancer with Lauren classification

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common tumors. There were several classifications of GC recently. The value of Lauren classification in evaluating the prognosis after radical gastrectomy was still unclear and the prognosis of gastric cancer remained relatively poor in the absence of prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to explore microRNA (miRNA) in the prognosis of GC with different Lauren classification.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1144 patients was performed in this study. Quantificational reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to examine the expression of miRNAs. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate prognosis value of Lauren classification.

RESULTS

Total 1144 GC patients were recruited in this cohort, including 302 diffuse type (26.4%), 436 intestinal type (38.1%) and 406 mixed type (35.5%) GC. Multivariate analysis showed that Lauren classification, patients' age, tumor size, tumor infiltrating depth, vascular nerve infiltrating and metastatic lymph nodes ration were significantly correlated with GC patients' OS and DFS. The miR-141-3p, miR-200b-3p and miR-133a-5p were significantly down-regulated in diffuse type compared to intestinal type GC tissues, the miR-105-5p had significant lower expression in diffuse type compared with intestinal type and mixed type GC tissues. As a consequence of univariate analysis, low miR-141-3p in diffuse type GC showed significant worse OS and DFS than high miR-141-3p.

CONCLUSIONS

Lauren classification was an independent prognostic factor in GC. MiR-141-3p was an independent prognostic factor and a promising prognostic biomarker in Lauren classification GC.

Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Current Management and Future Perspectives

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly differentiated and highly aggressive epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. The most common primary site is the lung, but they may arise in every organ. Approximately 37% of extrapulmonary NECs (EP-NECs) occur in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract, followed by the genitourinary (GU) system and gynecological tract. As a result of their rarity, there is scant evidence to guide treatment recommendations, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential for the management of such patients. Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents the standard of care for EP-NECs of any site, mirroring the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but further approaches are still under investigation. Indeed, ongoing trials evaluating targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and radionuclide therapy could provide potentially breakthrough therapeutic options. Given the relative dearth of evidence-based literature on these orphan diseases, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pathology and current treatment options, as well as to shed light on the most pressing unmet needs in the field.

Phase II study of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment in metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms when Ki-67 ≤55% is unknown. A prospective multi-centre phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment for these patients.

METHODS

Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily continuously and temozolomide 150 mg/m2 for 7 days every 2 weeks. Endpoints included response, survival, safety and quality of life (QoL). Histopathological re-evaluation according to the 2019 WHO classification was performed.

RESULTS

For 37 eligible patients, the primary endpoint with 65% disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months (m) was reached. The response rate was 30%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) 26.4 months. Considering 26 NET G3 patients, 6 months DCR was 77% vs. 22% among nine NEC patients (p = 0.006). PFS was superior for NET G3 vs. NEC (12.6 months vs. 3.4 months, Log-rank-test: p = 0.133, Breslow-test: p < 0.001). OS was significantly better for NET G3 (31.4 months vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 43% and 38%. QoL remained stable during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Everolimus and temozolomide may be a treatment option for selected GEP-NET G3 patients including careful monitoring. Toxicity did not compromise QoL.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC02248012).

Metabolism of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: what can omics tell us?

Introduction

Reprogramming of cellular metabolism is now a hallmark of tumorigenesis. In recent years, research on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) has focused on genetic and epigenetic modifications and related signaling pathways, but few studies have been devoted to characterizing the metabolic profile of these tumors. In this review, we thoroughly investigate the metabolic pathways in pNETs by analyzing the transcriptomic and metabolomic data available in the literature.

Methodology

We retrieved and downloaded gene expression profiles from all publicly available gene set enrichments (GSE43797, GSE73338, and GSE117851) to compare the differences in expressed genes based on both the stage and MEN1 mutational status. In addition, we conducted a systematic review of metabolomic data in NETs.

Results

By combining transcriptomic and metabolomic approaches, we have identified a distinctive metabolism in pNETs compared with controls without pNETs. Our analysis showed dysregulations in the one-carbon, glutathione, and polyamine metabolisms, fatty acid biosynthesis, and branched-chain amino acid catabolism, which supply the tricarboxylic acid cycle. These targets are implicated in pNET cell proliferation and metastasis and could also have a prognostic impact. When analyzing the profiles of patients with or without metastasis, or with or without MEN1 mutation, we observed only a few differences due to the scarcity of published clinical data in the existing research. Consequently, further studies are now necessary to validate our data and investigate these potential targets as biomarkers or therapeutic solutions, with a specific focus on pNETs.

Managing Metastatic Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma After First-Line Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that can arise from any organ and frequently presents with distant metastases. Advanced disease has a poor prognosis with median overall survival (OS) rarely exceeding 1 year even with systemic therapy. The management paradigm of advanced/metastatic EP-NEC has been extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and commonly consists of 1st line therapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by alternative cytotoxic regimens at the time of progression. Only a minority of patients are able to receive 2nd line therapy, and cytotoxics derived from the SCLC paradigm such as topotecan or lurbinectedin have very limited activity. We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic options in the 2nd and later lines and survey potential future developments in this space.

RECENT FINDINGS

After a long period of stagnation in treatment options and outcomes, more promising regimens are gradually being utilized in the 2nd line setting including systemic therapy combinations such as FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, modified FOLFIRINOX, CAPTEM, and, more recently, novel checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. Simultaneously, advances in the understanding of disease biology are helping to refine patient selection and identify commonalities between NEC and their sites of origin which may eventually lead to additional targeted therapy options. While many questions remain, contemporary developments give grounds for optimism that improved outcomes for EP-NEC will soon be within reach.

Equivalent Survival between Gastric Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Gastric Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

According to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms, gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) can be further divided into gastric large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GLNEC) and gastric small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GSNEC). Whether the prognoses of the two types have a discrepancy has long been disputed.

METHOD

We collected patients diagnosed with GLNEC or GSNEC in the National Cancer Center of China between January 2000 and December 2020. The characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. We further verified our conclusion using the SEER dataset.

RESULTS

A total of 114 GNEC patients, including 82 patients with GLNEC and 32 patients with GSNEC, have completed treatment in our hospital. Clinicopathologic differences were not observed between patients with GSNEC and GLNEC concerning the sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor location, tumor size, stage, treatment received, the expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, Chromogranin A, synaptophysin), and score on the Ki-67 index. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of GLNEC and GSNEC were 89.0%, 60.5%, and 52.4%, and 93.8%, 56.3%, and 52.7%, which showed no statistically significant differences. This result was confirmed further by using the SEER dataset after the inverse probability of treatment weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although with different cell morphology, the comparison of prognosis between the GLNEC and GSNEC has no significant statistical difference.

Patterns of Treatment Failure After Selective Rearranged During Transfection (RET) Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) harbors frequent mutations in RET oncogene. Selective RET inhibitors (RETi) have emerged as effective treatments. However, resistance almost invariably occurs.

METHODS

MTC patients who were initiated on RETi between 2018 and 2022 were included. Baseline characteristics, RET mutational status, RETi response, available tumor tissue and molecular profiles sampled pre- and post-RETi were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 46 MTC patients on RETi during the study period, 26 patients had discontinued at data cut-off because of progression (n = 16), death (n = 4), and toxicity (n = 6). The most frequent RET mutations at baseline were p.M918T (n = 29), and p.C634X (n = 6). Pre- and post-RETi molecular profiles were available in 14 patients. There was no primary resistance on pre-RETi samples. Post-RETi profiles revealed a bypass mechanism of resistance in 75% of the cases including RAS genes mutations (50%), FGFR2 and ALK fusions and and MYC p.P44L. RET solvent from and hinge region mutations was the only resistance mechanisms in 25% of the cases. Tumor samples from initial thyroidectomy, pre- and post-RETi, from six patients, showed an increase of the mean Ki 67-index of 7%, 17% and 40% respectively (P = 0.037) and a more aggressive poorly differentiated histology in three patients.

DISCUSSION

Bypass resistance may be the most frequent mechanism of progression under RETi. A more aggressive histology may arise following RETi and warrants further investigation.

Updates in histopathological classification and tissue biomarkers of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: What the clinician should know

Histopathological classifications of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) change regularly and the latest WHO classification published in 2022, which concerns all NEN in the body, attempts to standardize classifications in the different locations. Differentiation and proliferation mainly assessed by Ki-67 index are still the cornerstone of those classifications. However, many markers are now used for diagnostic (to check neuroendocrine differentiation, to identify the site of origin of a metastasis, to help separating high-grade neuroendocrine tumors/NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma/NEC), prognostic or theranostic purposes. NENs are often heterogeneous and this can lead to difficulties in classifications, biomarker and prognostic assessment. These different points are discussed successively in this review, insisting especially on the frequent digestive, gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) localizations.

Whole-exome sequencing of rectal neuroendocrine tumors

The genetic characteristics of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) were poorly understood. Depicting the genetic characteristics may provide a biological basis for prognosis prediction and novel treatment development. Tissues of 18 R-NET patients were analyzed using whole-exome sequencing. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were 1.15 Muts/MB (range, 0.03-23.28) and 0.36 (range, 0.00-10.97), respectively. Genes involved in P53 signaling, PI3K-AKT signaling, DNA damage repair, WNT signaling, etc. were frequently altered. Higher TMB (P = 0.078), higher CNV (P = 0.110), somatic mutation of CCDC168 (P = 0.049), HMCN1 (P = 0.040), MYO10 (P = 0.007), and amplification of ZC3H13 (P < 0.001) were associated with shorter OS. Potentially targetable gene alterations (PTGAs) were seen in 72% of the patients. FGFR1 amplification (22%) was the most common PTGA followed by BARD1 and BRCA2 mutation (each 17%). As for gene variations associated with the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), FAT1 alteration (39%) and PTEN depletion (28%) were commonly observed. In conclusion, frequently altered oncogenic pathways might contribute to the development and progression of R-NETs. Gene alterations significantly associated with prognosis might be potential novel targets. Targeted therapy might be a promising strategy as targetable alterations were prevalent in R-NETs. FAT1 alteration and PTEN depletion might be the main genetic alterations influencing the response to ICB besides overall low TMB and MSI in R-NETs.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), which are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation, can arise in various organs. NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphological differentiation, each of which has a distinct etiology, molecular profile, and clinicopathological features. While the majority of NECs originate in the pulmonary organs, extrapulmonary NECs occur most predominantly in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic GEP-NEC patients, the clinical benefits are limited and associated with a poor prognosis, indicating the clinically urgent need for effective therapeutic agents. The clinical development of molecular-targeted therapies has been hampered due to the rarity of GEP-NECs and the paucity of knowledge on their biology. In this review, we summarize the biology, current treatments, and molecular profiles of GEP-NECs based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses; we also highlight potent therapeutic targets for future precision medicine based on the most recent results of clinical trials.

Deep and Repeated Response to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in a Patient With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Brain Metastases: A Case Report

Metastatic CUP is complex, especially NCUP. Precision oncology is crucial for rare, aggressive cancers. A 54-year-old had HER2+ neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown origin. T-DXd treatment, response, re-challenge show importance of genomics and caution.

Precision medicine in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Where are we in 2023?

Precision medicine describes a target-related approach to tailoring diagnosis and treatment of the individual patient. While this personalized approach is revoluzionizing many areas of oncology, it is quite late in the field of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), in which there are few molecular alterations to be therapeutically targeted. We critically reviewed the current evidence about precision medicine in GEP NENs, focusing on potential clinically relevant actionable targets for GEP NENs, such as the mTOR pathway, MGMT, hypoxia markers, RET, DLL-3, and some general agnostic targets. We analysed the main investigational approaches with solid and liquid biopsies. Furthermore, we reviewed a model of precision medicine more specific for NENs that is the theragnostic use of radionuclides. Overall, currently no true predictive factors for therapy have been validated so far in GEP NENs, and the personalized approach is based more on clinical thinking within a NEN-dedicated multidisciplinary team. However, there is a robust background to suppose that precision medicine, with the theragnostic model will yield new insights in this context soon.

Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.